#Legal Services Procurement

[industrynewsupdates]

Legal Services Procurement Intelligence: A Comprehensive Guide

The legal services category is expected to grow at a CAGR of 5.3% from 2023 to 2030. The legal industry has undergone a transformation transformed due to the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI-powered software has become crucial in enabling law firms and lawyers to streamline their processes, saving valuable time. Automation tools enhance the efficiency of document creation and review, while collaborative platforms further simplify documentation procedures. These technological innovations help attorneys reduce costs and enhance convenience.

A growing number of law firms are using chatbots to improve their operational efficiency, ultimately saving them and their client’s time and money. These chatbots are capable of aiding legal companies in tasks such as digitizing data, searching for lawyer-specific documents, and handling various other activities. Additionally, they can assist in tasks like following up with unresponsive clients and gathering crucial information through automated conversations.

With the onset of AI, the current hierarchical structure of legal firms is expected to flatten due to the imminent demise of billable hours. Additionally, tTraditional firms will are expected to face increased competition from AI-driven tech companies acting as Alternative Legal Service Providers (ALSPs). Law firms might transform into tech-oriented entities, creating their own AI tools to provide AIaaS (Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS). This evolution in the industry, driven by AI, offers substantial opportunities and challenges in the industry. Firms that harness these advanced tools stand to enhance efficiency and accuracy, while significantly broadening their range of services.

Order your copy of the Legal Services Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030, published by Grand View Research, to get more details regarding day one, quick wins, portfolio analysis, key negotiation strategies of key suppliers, and low-cost/best-cost sourcing analysis

With the ongoing advancement of in technology, the prevalence of cyber threats has increased, giving rise to a new trend in the industry. Lawyers now face fresh challenges related to cybersecurity, emphasizing the need for expertise in this area. As technology and cyber threats continue to grow in complexity, lawyers play a vital role in tackling cybersecurity concerns. Their understanding of legal frameworks, risk management, compliance, litigation, and due diligence is essential in addressing these evolving challenges.

In recent years, in-house law departments have expanded both in scale and in influence, managing a larger volume of intricate tasks that were previously outsourced to law firms. Nowadays, many in-house departments adopt a business-oriented approach to legal services, involving professionals from various fields such as business, IT, and procurement to assess external service providers.

Law firms must establish their identity as service providers capable of utilizing AI tools effectively while also delivering unique human skills that AI cannot mimic. These human abilities will remain essential to the value proposition of human lawyers in the future.

Legal Services Sourcing Intelligence Highlights

• The legal service category has a high barrier to entry due to factors such as stringent regulations, the need for extensive expertise, and license requirements.

• The category is fragmented due to the presence of numerous players and the rise of ALSPs providing services at lower costs. Law firms try to differentiate by case resolution time, win rate, and client satisfaction.

• Consultant salaries and licenses, office rent/lease, office equipment, insurance, utilities, and othersare some of the costs incurred in providing services.

List of Key Suppliers in the Legal Services Category

• FindLaw

• Avvo

• LegalZoom

• Baker McKenzie

• Baker Hostetler

• Goodwin Procter

• LegalShield

• Rally

• Deloitte

• PwC

Browse through Grand View Research’s collection of procurement intelligence studies:

• Tax Advisory Services Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030 (Revenue Forecast, Supplier Ranking & Matrix, Emerging Technologies, Pricing Models, Cost Structure, Engagement & Operating Model, Competitive Landscape)

• Insurance Services Procurement Intelligence Report, 2023 - 2030 (Revenue Forecast, Supplier Ranking & Matrix, Emerging Technologies, Pricing Models, Cost Structure, Engagement & Operating Model, Competitive Landscape)

Legal Services Procurement Intelligence Report Scope

• Legal Services Category Growth Rate: CAGR of 5.3% from 2023 to 2030

• Pricing growth Growth Outlook: 2% - 3% (Annually)

• Pricing Models: Value-based pricing, service-based pricing, competition-based pricing

• Supplier Selection Scope: Cost and pricing, past engagements, productivity, geographical presence

• Supplier selection Selection Criteria: Diversified types of cases handled, win rate, experience in the field, case resolution time, transaction support, global reach, regulatory compliance, technical specifications, operational capabilities, quality measures, certifications, data privacy regulations, and others

• Report Coverage: Revenue forecast, supplier ranking, supplier positioning matrix, emerging technology, pricing models, cost structure, competitive landscape, growth factors, trends, engagement, and operating model

Brief about Pipeline by Grand View Research:

A smart and effective supply chain is essential for growth in any organization. Pipeline division at Grand View Research provides detailed insights on every aspect of supply chain, which helps in efficient procurement decisions.

Our services include (not limited to):

• Market Intelligence involving – market size and forecast, growth factors, and driving trends

• Price and Cost Intelligence – pricing models adopted for the category, total cost of ownerships

• Supplier Intelligence – rich insight on supplier landscape, and identifies suppliers who are dominating, emerging, lounging, and specializing

• Sourcing / Procurement Intelligence – best practices followed in the industry, identifying standard KPIs and SLAs, peer analysis, negotiation strategies to be utilized with the suppliers, and best suited countries for sourcing to minimize supply chain disruptions

[mostlysignssomeportents]

The Sacklers woulda gotten away with it if it wasn't for those darned meddling feds

The saga of the Sacklers, a multigenerational billionaire crime family of mass-murdering dope-peddlers, is an enraging parable about how the wealthy, the courts, and sadistic high-powered lawyers collude to destroy the lives of millions, profit handsomely, and evade justice.

But there's an unexpected twist to this tale. After the Sacklers procured a sham bankruptcy that denied their victims the right to sue while leaving their fortune largely intact, the Supreme Court – yes, this Supreme Court – saw through the scam and froze the process, pending a full hearing:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/10/us/supreme-court-purdue-pharma-opioid-settlement.html

The Sacklers basically invented modern, legal dope peddling. Arthur Sackler, the family's original crime-boss, revived the practice of direct-to-consumer drug marketing, dormant since the death of the medicine show, to peddle Valium. An aggressive and shrewd lobbyist, Arthur built the family fortune and, more importantly, its connections:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/how-the-sackler-family-built-a-pharma-dynasty-and-fueled-an-american-calamity/

A generation later, the family's business company created Oxycontin, and procured misleading and false research about the drug's safety kickstarting the opioid epidemic, whose American body-count is closing in on a million dead. Armed with inflated claims about opioid safety, the Sacklers' pharma reps bribed, cajoled and tricked doctors into writing millions of prescriptions for oxy.

This scam had a natural best-before date. As ODs flooded America's ERs and bodies piled up in America's morgues, it became increasingly clear that something was rotten. The Sacklers pursued a multipronged campaign to keep the truth from coming to light, and to keep the billions flowing.

On the one hand, they hired McKinsey to find novel ways to encourage doctors to keep writing prescriptions and to convince pharmacists to turn a blind eye to abuse. McKinsey had all kinds of great ideas here, including paying pharma distributors cash bonuses for every overdose death in their territory:

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/03/business/mckinsey-opioids-settlement.html

When the issue of these deaths came up in public, the Sacklers blamed "criminal addicts" for their own misery, stigmatizing both people who desperately needed pain relief and the people who'd been deliberately hooked on the Sacklers' products. The legacy of this smear campaign is still with us, both in the contempt for people struggling with addiction and in the cruel barriers placed between people in unbearable agony and medical relief.

But mostly, the Sacklers kept their names out of it. They laundered their reputations by donating a homeopathic fraction of their vast drug fortune to art galleries and museums in a bid to make their names synonymous with good deeds.

The Sacklers didn't invent this trick. Think of the way that history's great monsters – Carnegie, Mellon, Rockefeller, Ford – are remembered today for the foundations and charities that bear their names, not for the untold misery they inflicted on their workers, their crimes against their customers, and the corruption of governments.

But the Sacklers made those Gilded Age barons seem like amateurs. They invented a modern elite philanthropy playbook that Anand Giridharadas documents in his must-read Winners Take All, about the charity-industrial complex that washes away an ocean of blood with a trickle of money:

https://memex.craphound.com/2018/11/10/winners-take-all-modern-philanthropy-means-that-giving-some-away-is-more-important-than-how-you-got-it/

As part of this PR exercise, the individual Sacklers kept their names and images out of the public eye. For years, there were virtually no news-service photos of individual Sacklers. When journalists dared to criticize the family, they used vicious attack-lawyers to intimidate them into retractions and silence (I was threatened by the Sacklers' lawyers).

They also worked their media mogul pals, like Mike Bloomberg, who added their names to the "Friends of Mike" list that Bloomberg reporters were required to consult before writing negative coverage:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/02/29/friends-of-mike-enemies-of-the-people/#sacklerbergs

But Stein's Law says that "anything that can't go on forever will eventually stop." As lawsuits mounted, the Sacklers found themselves increasingly synonymous with death, not charitable works. But like any canny criminal, the Sacklers had a getaway plan.

First, they extracted vast sums from Purdue and shifted it into offshore financial secrecy havens:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-purduepharma-bankruptcy/sacklers-reaped-up-to-13-billion-from-oxycontin-maker-u-s-states-say-idUSKBN1WJ19V

Even as this money was disappearing into legal black holes, the Sacklers demanded – and received – extraordinary protection from the courts, who aggressively sealed testimony and materials presented through discovery:

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-courts-secrecy-judges/

When this gambit finally failed, the Sacklers insisted that were down to their last $4 billion, and, with trillions in claims pending against them, they declared bankruptcy.

When a normal person declares bankruptcy, they are required to divest themselves of nearly everything of value they possess, and then still find themselves hounded by cruel arm-breakers who deluge them with threatening calls and letters:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/05/19/zombie-debt/#damnation

But for the richest people in America, bankruptcy is merely a way to cleanse one's balance sheet of liabilities for any atrocity you may have committed on the way, without giving up your fortune.

The Sacklers are a case-study in how a corrupt bankruptcy can be conducted.

Purdue Pharma presents a maddening case-study in the corrupt benefits of bankruptcy. When it was announced in March, many were outraged to learn that the Sacklers were going to walk away with billions, while their victims got stiffed.

First, they converted their victims' right to compensation into "property" that the Sacklers themselves owned. This transferred jurisdiction over these claims from the regular court system to the bankruptcy court. A bankruptcy judge – not a jury – would decide how much each of these claims was worth, and then what how much of that worth these victims (now recast as creditors) would be entitled to through the bankruptcy.

Thus tens of thousands of claims were nonconsensually settled without a trial, by an administrative judge with no criminal jurisdiction, not a federal judge who'd undergone Senate confirmation:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/03/31/vaccine-for-the-global-south/#claims-extinguished

These "coercive restructuring techniques" are not available to everyday people who are drowning in student debt or credit-card bills – these are the exclusive purview of the wealthiest Americans, who enjoy a completely different bankruptcy system that is rigged in their favor.

Three judges – David Jones and Marvin Isgur of Houston and Bob Drain of New York – hear 96% of the country's large corporate bankruptcies:

https://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2021/05/judge-shopping-in-bankruptcy.html

These judges are unbelievably horny for corporations, embracing a legal theory "that casts the invention of the limited liability corporation alongside that of the steam engine as a paradigmatic development in the pursuit of prosperity":

https://prospect.org/justice/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-the-sacklers-purdue-pharma-bankruptcy/

Now there are more than three bankruptcy judges in America, so how do the nation's biggest companies get their cases heard by these three enthusiastic Renfields for corporate vampirism?

They cheat.

For example: when GM was facing bankruptcy, it argued that it was a New York company on the basis that it owned a single Chevy dealership in Harlem, and got in front of Judge Drain.

The Sacklers were – characteristically – even more brazen. They really wanted to get their case in front of Judge Drain, the nation's most enthusiastic supporter of "third party releases," through which bankrupt billionaires can wipe the slate clean, securing dismissals of all claims by the people they wronged.

Drain is also uniquely hostile to independent examiners, "an independent third-party appointed by the court to investigate 'fraud, dishonesty, incompetence, misconduct, mismanagement, or irregularity…by current or former management of the debtor."

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3851339

If you're the Sacklers, hoping to keep two thirds of your billions and extinguish all claims by your victims, there is no better helpmeet than Judge Robert Drain of the Southern District of New York.

So, 192 days before filing for bankruptcy, the Sacklers opened an office in White Plains, New York (a company may claim jurisdiction in a specific court once they've operated a business there for 180 days).

Then they filed a bankruptcy in which they altered the metadata on their casefile, inserting the code for a Westchester county hearing into the machine-readable, human-invisible parts of the documents they uploaded to the federal Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system (they also captioned the case with "RDD, for "Robert D Drain").

They chose their judge, and the judge obliged. UCLA Law's Lynn LoPucki is one of the leading scholars of these bankruptcy "megacases," and has written extensively on why these three judges are so deferential to corporate criminals seeking to flense themselves of culpability. She sees judges like Drain motivated by "personal aggrandizement and celebrity and ability to indirectly channel to the local bankruptcy bar. The judge is the star and the ringmaster of a megacase – very appealing to certain personalities."

Thus, these judges are "willing and eager to cater to debtors to attract business…[an] assurance to debtors that…these judges will not transfer out cases with improper venue or rule against the debtor…"

https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/02870w66d

This kind of judge-shopping goes beyond the Sacklers; the cases that Drain and co preside over make a mockery of the idea of America as a land of equal justice. "Prepack" and "drive-through" bankruptcies are reliable get-out-of-jail-free cards for capitalism's worst monsters: private equity firms.

Whether PE murdered your grandmother by buying her care-home and putting each worker in charge of 30 seniors:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/portopiccolo-nursing-homes-maryland/2020/12/21/a1ffb2a6-292b-11eb-9b14-ad872157ebc9_story.html

or poisoned your kids by filling your neighborhood with carcinogens:

https://www.webmd.com/special-reports/ethylene-oxide/20190719/residents-unaware-of-cancer-causing-toxin-in-air

limited liability wipes the slate clean.

30% of America's bankruptcies are private equity companies using the bankruptcy system to wipe away claims for their misdeeds, while keeping a fortune, thanks to the shield of limited liability.

Take Millennium Health, JamesS lattery's fake drug-testing company, which promised to help nursing homes figure out whether seniors were abusing (or selling) their meds by testing their piss for angel dust and other drugs. Slattery defrauded Medicare and Medicaid for millions, borrowed $1.8 billion (Slattery got $1.3 billion of that). He eventually walked away from this fraud after paying a mere $256m to settle all claims, and kept a fortune in assets, including the 40 vintage planes his private company ("Pissed Away LLC" – I am not making this up) owned:

https://prospect.org/justice/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-the-sacklers-purdue-pharma-bankruptcy/

For the wealthy, bankruptcy is the sport of kings, a way to skip out on consequences. For the poor, bankruptcy is an anchor – or a noose. This is by design: judges who preside over elite bankruptcies speak of their protagonists as heroic "risk takers" and tiptoe around any consequences, lest these titans be chained to a mortal's fate, costing us all the benefits of their entrepreneurial genius.

PE companies helped the Sacklers design their own bankruptcy strategy, and it was a standout, even by the standards of Bob Drain and his kangaroo bankruptcy court. But now, the Supreme Court has pumped the brakes on the whole enterprise.

The judges ruled that the exceptions the Sacklers took advantage of were intended for bankrupts in "financial distress" – not billionaires with vast fortunes hidden overseas. In so doing, the court threatens all manner of corrupt arrangements, from "the Boy Scouts, wildfires and allegations of sexual abuse in the church diocese — where third parties get a benefit from a bankruptcy they themselves aren’t going through.”

The case was brought by the DoJ's US Trustee Program, which lost in the Second Circuit when it tried to halt the Purdue bankruptcy and argued that the Sacklers themselves had to declare bankruptcy to discharge the claims against them.

Now the Supremes have hit pause on the bankruptcy the Second Circuit approved, and will hear the case themselves. It's only one step on a long road, but it's an unprecedented one. Some of the country's filthiest fortunes are riding on the outcome.

Going to Defcon this weekend? I’m giving a keynote, “An Audacious Plan to Halt the Internet’s Enshittification and Throw it Into Reverse,” tomorrow (Aug 12) at 12:30pm, followed by a book signing at the No Starch Press booth at 2:30pm!

https://info.defcon.org/event/?id=50826

I’m kickstarting the audiobook for “The Internet Con: How To Seize the Means of Computation,” a Big Tech disassembly manual to disenshittify the web and bring back the old, good internet. It’s a DRM-free book, which means Audible won’t carry it, so this crowdfunder is essential. Back now to get the audio, Verso hardcover and ebook:

http://seizethemeansofcomputation.org

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/08/11/justice-delayed/#justice-redeemed

Image: Edwardx (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serpentine_Sackler_Gallery,_June_2016_05.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[snapmite1998]

Darth Maul's ambitious plan to leverage the chaos from the aftermath of the Clone Wars has led to suffering of refugees and the forgotten inhabitants in the Galactic Underworld is a calculated strategy to build power and influence from the shadows of Coruscant. Here’s how he could orchestrate the operation with Dryden Vos and Crimson Dawn:

Step 1: Establishing the Humanitarian Front

1.1. Employing the service of Dryden Vos:

Maul has Dryden Vos, a cunning and ruthless leader of Crimson Dawn, to manage the operation. Vos’s experience with the criminal underworld allows him to navigate the complex networks of power and resources.

1.2. Creating a Cover Story:

To gain the trust of the public and the underworld, Vos crafts a narrative that Crimson Dawn is a humanitarian organization aimed at alleviating the suffering caused by the Clone Wars. This includes distributing food, medicine, and financial aid to refugees in the Undercity.

Step 2: Mobilizing Resources

2.1. Gathering Supplies:

Crimson Dawn uses its vast resources to acquire supplies through both legal and illegal means. This could involve negotiating with sympathetic suppliers, stealing from warehouses, or even using bounty hunters to procure goods.

2.2. Distributing Aid:

Vos sets up distribution points throughout the Undercity, staffed by Crimson Dawn operatives disguised as charity workers. This provides a façade of legitimacy and allows for the gathering of intelligence on local populations and potential recruits.

Step 3: Building a Network of Support

3.1. Community Engagement:

Crimson Dawn engages with local leaders and influential figures in the Undercity, providing aid in exchange for loyalty and support. By positioning themselves as benefactors, they begin to build a network of allies among the downtrodden.

3.2. Recruitment of Disenfranchised Individuals:

As the humanitarian efforts continue, Crimson Dawn identifies individuals with skills, such as former soldiers, mechanics, and navigators, who are desperate for work and a sense of purpose. These individuals are offered roles within Crimson Dawn, often with promises of wealth and protection.

Step 4: Covert Military Training

4.1. Training Recruits:

Under the guise of providing vocational training, Crimson Dawn begins to train these recruits in combat and guerrilla tactics. This training is conducted in secret, ensuring that the recruits remain loyal to Maul’s larger goals.

4.2. Establishing Cells:

The recruits are organized into small cells that can operate independently within the Undercity. This decentralized structure allows for flexibility and deniability, making it harder for the Republic or Jedi to trace these activities back to Maul.

Step 5: Strategic Operations

5.1. Sabotage and Disruption:

As the network of recruits grows, Maul directs them to conduct sabotage operations against Republic supply lines and infrastructure, further destabilizing the situation on Coruscant and inciting unrest among the populace.

5.2. Building Public Sentiment:

Crimson Dawn uses propaganda to portray the Jedi and the Republic as oppressors, framing their actions as a necessary rebellion against a corrupt system. This narrative can draw more individuals to their cause.

Step 6: The Endgame

6.1. Coordinating a Large-Scale Uprising:

With a significant force built from the ranks of the disenfranchised, Maul plans a coordinated uprising within the Undercity. This would catch the Republic off guard, leading to chaos that could spread to the surface levels of Coruscant.

6.2. Sacking Coruscant:

The ultimate goal is to create enough unrest and chaos to launch a full-scale attack on key locations within Coruscant, allowing Crimson Dawn to seize control and establish a new order under Maul’s leadership.

Conclusion

Through this multi-faceted strategy, Maul aims to exploit the vulnerabilities exposed by the Clone Wars, using humanitarian efforts as a cover for building a loyal army. By manipulating the suffering of the populace and positioning Crimson Dawn as their savior, Maul seeks not only to gain power but to position himself as a formidable force in the galaxy, ready to strike against the Jedi and the Republic at the opportune moment.

[guitarhappyman]

What the Trump Nominees Have Not Done—And Will Not Do

5 Comments / December 5, 2024

Victor Davis Hanson

American Greatness

Deflated by the resounding November defeat, the left now believes it can magically rebound by destroying Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees.

Many of Trump’s picks are well outside the usual Washington, DC/New York political, media, and corporate nexus.

But that is precisely the point—to insert reformers into a bloated, incompetent, and weaponized government who are not part of it.

Trump’s nominee for FBI director, Kash Patel, is already drawing severe criticism.

His furious enemies cannot go after his resume, since he has spent a lifetime in private, congressional, and executive billets, both in investigations and intelligence.

Instead, they claim he is too vindictive and does not reflect the ethos of the FBI.

But what will Patel not do as the new director?

He will not serially lie under oath to federal investigators as did interim FBI Director Andrew McCabe, a current Patel critic.

He will not forge an FBI court affidavit, as did convicted felon and agency lawyer Kevin Clinesmith.

He will not claim amnesia 245 times under congressional oath to evade embarrassing admissions as did former Director James Comey.

He will not partner with a foreign national to collect dirt and subvert a presidential campaign as the FBI did with Christopher Steele in 2016

He will not use the FBI to draft social media to suppress news unfavorable to a presidential candidate on the eve of an election.

He would not have suppressed FBI knowledge that Hunter Biden’s laptop was genuine—to allow the lie to spread that it was “Russian disinformation” on the eve of the 2020 election.

He will not raid the home of an ex-president with SWAT teams, surveil Catholics, monitor parents at school board meetings, or go after pro-life peaceful protestors.

Decorated combat veteran Pete Hegseth is another controversial nominee for secretary of defense.

What will Hegseth likely not do?

Go AWOL without notifying the president of a serious medical procedure as did current Secretary Lloyd Austin?

Install race and gender criteria for promotion and mandate Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion training?

Insinuate falsely that cabals of white supremacists had infiltrated the military—only to alienate that entire demographic and thus ensure the Pentagon came up 40,000 recruits short?

Oversee the scramble from Kabul that saw $50 billion in U.S. military equipment abandoned to Taliban terrorists?

Watch passively as a Chinese spy balloon traversed the continental United States for a week?

Allow the chairman of the Joint Chiefs to promise his Chinese communist counterpart that the People’s Liberation Army would first be informed if the President of the United States was felt to issue a dangerous order?

Rotate into the Pentagon from a defense contractor boardship and then leave office to rotate back there to leverage procurement decisions?

Oversee the Pentagon’s serial flunking of fiscal audits?

Health and Human Services nominee Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is certainly a maverick. He may earn the most Democratic hits, given his former liberal credentials.

But what will RFK also not do as HHS secretary?

Oversee his agencies circumventing U.S. law by transferring money to communist China to help it produce lethal gain-of-function viruses of the COVID-19 sort—in the manner of Dr. Fauci?

Organize scientists to go after critics of mandatory masking and defame them?

Give pharmaceutical companies near-lifetime exemptions from legal jeopardy for rushing into production mRNA vaccines not traditionally vetted and tested?

Leave office to monetize his HHS expertise and thus make millions from the pharmaceutical companies?

Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, former congressional representative and military veteran Tulsi Gabbard, will soon be defamed in congressional hearings.

But what has Gabbard not done?

Joined “51 former intelligence authorities” to lie on the eve of the 2020 election that the Hunter Biden laptop “had all the hallmarks” of a Russian information/disinformation operation”—in an effort to swing the election to incumbent Joe Biden?

Lied under congressional oath like former DNI James Clapper, who claimed he only gave the “least untruthful answer” in congressional testimony?

Encourage the FBI to monitor a presidential campaign in efforts to discredit it—in the manner of former CIA Director John Brennan, who lied not once but twice under oath?

Fail to foresee the American meltdown in Kabul, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel, or the Houthis takeover of the Red Sea?

We are going to hear some outrageous things in the upcoming congressional confirmation hearings.

But one thing we will not hear about are the crimes, deceptions, and utter incompetence of prior and current government grandees.

The current crew, not their proposed Trump replacements, prompted the sick and tired American people to demand different people.

Voters want novel approaches to reform a government that they not only no longer trust but also now deeply fear.

[zee-man-chatter]

JPMorgan Settles Jeffrey Epstein Case For $75 Million, Avoiding Trial by Tyler Durden - Tuesday, Sep 26, 2023 - 11:25 AM

JPMorgan Chase has agreed to pay the US Virgin Islands (USVI) a scant $75 million to settle a lawsuit alleging that the bank knowingly aided Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex-trafficking operation, ending a legal battle that exposed all sorts of embarrassing ties between the bank and the dead pedophile.

The settlement was reached one month before the sides were scheduled to go to trial in Manhattan, where the USVI sought $190 million from the bank.

JPMorgan admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement.

Earlier this month we learned that JPMorgan flagged over $1 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Epstein, which they claimed to have reported to the US government, according to a filing by the USVI.

"JPMorgan was a full-service bank for Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking," said Mimi Liu, an attorney for the USVI, which said that the enormous sum bolsters key allegations in their legal action against the bank. According to the lawsuit, JPMorgan knowingly benefited from Epstein's wrongdoing, Bloomberg reports, noting that this is the first time in the case that the 'sheer volume of Epstein's financial activity at JPMorgan over a 16-year period has been disclosed.'

The suspicious activity was detailed in a 2019 filing to the US Department of Treasury, according to the lawsuit. The report was made after Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell a month after his arrest on sex trafficking charges. Epstein had been with the bank from the late 1990s through 2013, when they finally cut ties with him.

Epstein notoriously trafficked some of his victims to a private island in the USVI.

JPMorgan denies that it let Epstein's activities slide, and says it reported around 150 cash transactions to a federal regulator between 2002 and 2013.

Last month, the USVI told the judge in the case that the bank facilitated over $1.1 million in payments from Jeffrey Epstein to "girls or women," many of whom had Eastern European surnames.

Over $320,000 of the payments were made to "numerous individuals for whom JPMorgan had no previously identified payments," according to USVI attorney, Linda Singer, who accused the bank of failing to disclose the payments until after the end of discovery - the period in which parties in a lawsuit exchange evidence.

The bank claimed that's irrelevant, because the USVI doesn't have legal standing to claim JPMorgan obstructed a trafficking investigation because it wasn't a victim.

"The only reason that JPMorgan after 16 years reported the $1 billion in suspicious transactions was because he was arrested and then he was dead," singer added.

In June, former PMorgan Chase executive Jes Staley threw CEO Jamie Dimon under the bus over the bank's relationship with Epstein - claiming in legal documents that he and Dimon communicated about the convicted sex offender.

Epstein died in jail following his 2019 arrest on federal sex-trafficking charges. The pedophile, who became a JPMorgan client around 1998 - bringing the bank hundreds of millions of dollars, formed a close bond with Staley, who eventually oversaw JPMorgan's investment bank.

According to the filing, Staley says that he and Dimon communicated when Epstein was arrested in 2006 and 2008 when Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution, and served 13 months in a work-release program. Staley also claims that Dimon communicated with him several times through 2012 about whether to maintain Epstein as a client.

In one July 2010 email exchange between Staley and Epstein, Staley discussed 'Disney princesses' with Epstein.

"That was fun," Staley allegedly wrote to Epstein. "Say hi to Snow White."

To which Epstein replied: "[W]hat character would you like next?"

"Beauty and the Beast."

Epstein also emailed Staley photos of young women in seductive poses, the filing continued, with the USVI alleging that the exchange referred to young women and girls procured by Epstein.

Staley, according to the filing, "visited Epstein’s properties in the Virgin Islands and elsewhere," and "exchanged hundreds of messages with Epstein from his JPMorgan email account in full view of JPMorgan, including some with photos of young women, discussed Epstein’s provision of services to him during his travel on dates that closely corresponded with Epstein’s payments to the same young woman from his JPMorgan accounts, and discussed young women or girls procured by Epstein using the names of Disney princesses."

Epstein and Staley exchanged more than 1,200 emails over several years. Staley - who left JPMorgan to become CEO of Barclays two years later, stepped down from the latter in 2021 following a UK Financial Conduct Authority probe into his relationship with the pedophile financier.

[mariacallous]

Last month, the FBI raided the homes of Scott Ritter, a former United Nations weapons inspector and critic of American foreign policy, and Dimitri Simes, a former think tank executive and an adviser to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. In late August, The New York Times reported that these searches were part of the U.S. Justice Department’s “broad criminal investigation into Americans who have worked with Russia’s state television networks.”

In the past two weeks, U.S. officials have taken numerous measures against Russia Today and its affiliates and accelerated police actions against Russia-based individuals and entities accused of covert influence operations, including money laundering, sanctions violations, and unregistered foreign agent work. For example, the Justice Department announced the seizure of 32 Internet domains used in Russian government-directed foreign malign influence campaigns (colloquially referred to as “Doppelganger”), alleging that Russian companies used online domains to impersonate legitimate news entities and unique media brands to spread Russian government propaganda covertly, violating U.S. laws against money laundering and trademarks. 

That same day, the Justice Department indicted two Russia-based employees of RT for conspiring to commit money laundering and conspiring to violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act in a $10-million scheme to fund and direct a Tennessee-based company to publish and disseminate information “with hidden Russian-government messaging.” A day later, officials charged Dmitri Simes and his wife with participating in a plot to violate U.S. sanctions and launder money obtained from Russian state television.

About a week later, the U.S. State Department issued a special “alert to the world,” declaring that new information obtained over the past year reveals that Russia Today has “moved beyond being simply a media outlet” and has become “an entity with cyber capabilities” that’s “also engaged in information operations, covert influence, and military procurement.” Washington claims that the Russian government embedded within RT in Spring 2023 an entity “with cyber operational capabilities and ties to Russian intelligence.” Based on these allegations, Meta — the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp — soon announced that it had banned Russia Today and its affiliates from all its platforms. 

A day before that big announcement from the State Department, a jury in Tampa, Florida, convicted four American citizens of conspiracy to act as agents of the Russian government. Case evidence first reported by RFE/RL shows that the activists on trial secretly coordinated their activities and received funding from “Anti-Globalization Movement” head Alexander Ionov, who acted on orders from Russia’s Federal Security Service.

To discuss this recent explosion of American police and diplomatic activity targeting RT and Russian covert influence operations in the U.S., The Naked Pravda spoke to RFE/RL journalist Mike Eckel, who coauthored the September 6 report on how Ionov and his FSB handlers “chatted and plotted to sow discord in the United States.”

Timestamps for this episode:

(5:54) The U.S. government’s coordinated campaign against Russian covert influence operations

(7:18) Legal strategies when prosecuting Moscow’s malign activities

(8:37) Alexander Ionov and the FSB

(15:11) American activists and Russian covert operations

(18:52) “Foreign agency” in the U.S. vs. in Russia

(32:12) Dmitri Simes and Channel One

(36:18) Scott Ritter and Russia Today

[chaifootsteps]

RE: https://www.tumblr.com/chaifootsteps/731660318691999744/isnt-it-weird-as-hell-they-announced-a-summer?source=share&ref=_tumblr

I have a feeling they did have a streaming service lined up in the initial contract. You don't just invest ALL that money into making a series like this without having a buyer already on deck otherwise you end up potentially eating the financial costs of making it in the first place.

Considering A24 already has existing contracts with several streaming services for their other projects, this would not have been difficult for them to procure ahead of time. They would simply need to pitch the series and have the buyer sign on.

My guess? Either Viv did something that allowed them to dissolve the original deal or the buyer decided it was worth whatever legal fees they'd have to pay to get out of the deal. This makes the most sense to me from a sheer financial standpoint because otherwise A24 was risking wasting a RIDICULOUS amount of cash on a series that might not ever have a place to air and I just can't see them being that stupid.

Where one mystery ends, three more begin!

[financefatloss]

NJ Attorney for Korean Companies in the USA

Tapping The Services Of a New Jersey legal professional focusing on Korean business and migration requires ensures professional support in navigating USA rules. Whether looking for 뉴저지 변호사, a knowledgeable lawyer may help along with company conformity, visa procurement, and more. For those from South Korea, tailored legal solutions are offered to resolve particular problems in New Jersey.

[masllp]

Company Setup Services by MASLLP – Your Trusted Partner for Business Success

Starting a new business is a dream for many, but navigating through the complexities of company setup can be overwhelming. From registrations and legal compliance to managing documentation, every step requires expert guidance. MASLLP offers comprehensive company setup services to ensure a smooth and hassle-free process, making your business journey seamless and stress-free.

Why is Company Setup Crucial for Your Business? Proper company setup lays the foundation for business success. It establishes a clear legal identity, boosts credibility, and ensures compliance with all regulatory requirements. Whether you are a startup or an established business expanding into new territories, a structured setup process helps avoid legal hassles and positions your business for growth.

Company Setup Services Offered by MASLLP MASLLP specializes in company registration and setup services tailored to your business needs. Here’s how we assist you:

Choosing the Right Business Structure Selecting the right entity type is crucial. MASLLP helps you decide between:

Private Limited Company Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Sole Proprietorship Partnership Firm Public Limited Company We evaluate your business goals and recommend the structure that aligns with your vision.

Company Registration Services We handle end-to-end company registration with precision, including:

Obtaining Digital Signature Certificates (DSC) Acquiring Director Identification Numbers (DIN) Filing applications with the Registrar of Companies (RoC) Procuring the Certificate of Incorporation MASLLP ensures your company is registered efficiently, meeting all compliance requirements.

Compliance and Legal Assistance Our team provides assistance with ongoing legal and regulatory compliance, including:

GST Registration PAN/TAN Registration Filing annual returns and financial statements Ensuring tax compliance

Documentation and Licenses MASLLP simplifies the process of obtaining the necessary licenses and drafting key legal documents, such as:

MOA (Memorandum of Association) and AOA (Articles of Association) Business licenses and approvals specific to your industry

Why Choose MASLLP for Company Setup Services? Expert Team: Our experienced professionals have in-depth knowledge of company laws and business compliance. End-to-End Support: From planning to execution, MASLLP takes care of everything. Customized Solutions: We understand that every business is unique and offer tailored solutions. Time-Efficient: Our streamlined processes save you time and effort. Affordable Packages: High-quality services at competitive prices.

Benefits of Partnering with MASLLP Stress-Free Process: Let the experts handle the complexities while you focus on your business. Compliance Assurance: Avoid legal penalties with proper registrations and timely filings. Growth-Focused Solutions: Build a solid foundation for your business to scale efficiently.

Who Can Benefit from MASLLP’s Services? MASLLP caters to a wide range of businesses, including:

Startups looking for quick and efficient company registration. Entrepreneurs planning to launch a new venture. Small and medium businesses (SMEs) aiming to ensure compliance. Corporates looking to expand operations across India. Start Your Business Journey with MASLLP Today! If you are looking for company setup services in India, MASLLP is your trusted partner for success. With years of experience and a proven track record, we make the entire process simple, efficient, and cost-effective.

Contact MASLLP Today to take the first step towards setting up your dream business!

[madamlaydebug]

SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That when a person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the United States, ha: heretofore or shall hereafter escape into another State or Territory of the United States, the person or persons to whom such service 01 labor may be due, or his, her, or their agent or attorney, duly authorized, by power of attorney, in writing, acknowledged and certified under the seal of some legal officer or court of the State or Territory in which the same may be executed, may pursue and reclaim such fugitive person, either by procuring a warrant from some one of the courts, judges, or commissioners aforesaid, of the proper circuit, district, or county, for the apprehension of such fugitive from service or labor, or by seizing and arresting such fugitive, where the same can be done without process, and by taking, or causing such person to be taken, forthwith before such court, judge, or commissioner, whose duty it shall be to hear and determine the case of such claim a fugitive summary manner; and upon satisfactory proof being made, by deposition or affidavit, in writing, to be taken and certified by such court, judge, or commissioner, or by other satisfactory testimony, duly taken and certified by some court, magistrate, justice of the peace, or other legal officer authorized to administer an oath and take depositions under the laws of the State or Territory from which such person owing service or labor may have escaped, with a certificate of such magistracy or other authority, as aforesaid, with the seal of the proper court or officer thereto attached, which seal shall be sufficient to establish the competency of the proof, and with proof, also by affidavit, of the identity of the person whose service or labor is claimed to be due as aforesaid, that the person so arrested does in fact owe service or labor to the person or persons claiming him or her, in the State or Territory from which such fugitive may have escaped as aforesaid, and that said person escaped, to make out and deliver to such claimant, his or her agent or attorney, a certificate setting forth the substantial facts as to the service or labor due from such fugitive.

[rauthschild]

How to Counteract White Supremacy and Afro-Saxons Attack on DEI...

The solution to the problem in counteracting White Supremacy MEGA Movement's attack against foreign government services corporations and corporate America's DEI employment and procurement practices.

Is quite simple, you just simply use the British Territorial United States and Vatican Municipal United States, and its Federal States, Cities and Counties thereof, Freedom of Information Act and Public Disclosure laws.

The purpose of this is to publicly disclose the actual Titleship/ Ownership controlling interest of the corporations in question, through the FOIA and Public Disclosure laws.

Additionally, your so-called minority legal Scholars should also research and study the 13 Asia Asset Nations Treaties, 1913 Trustee Treaty, 1781-1783- Present Treaty of Versailles, Tripartite Agreements, Conventions, Concordance, United States Treasury Federal ID 8216 and 8217, Five Books, Sixteen Copies, Blue Book, et. al.

You shall be amazed to learn, that the 13 Black British United Colonies debts go back to 1701-1900-Present and White Supremacy wasn't at the signatory table, nor were they the Founding Fathers.

In the year of 1776 the 13 Asia Asset Nations Families signed a Treaty agreeing to Bankroll the 13 Black British Colonies for 300 years (> Contract No. 13579).

Now, keep in mind that North America is Ancient Egypt, and the Pyramid on the One Dollar Bill, is your Seal, i.e. Part and Parcel.

The Cloaked For Secrecy, is that only 7% of the Fortune 500 Companies stocks are publicly traded (This Note Is Legal Tender For All Debts, Public and Private).

So, what you read and hear about in the mainstream media, are merely White Supremacy Propaganda.

Ironically, In the first three months of 2024, more than 600 CEOs left their jobs in the United States, either through retirement, resignation, or being forced out. This is considered a record pace.

Why?

Well, the Asiatic Families (Melanated) own Elon Musk, Rothschild, Rockefellers, Strauss, Dupont, et. al.. Elon himself is unable to write a check for $4 Billion (fiat), without it bouncing across the 🌎.

Again, US History is not American History, and Black History is not, the Autochthonous Black and Brown people of North America, History.

The British Territorial United States and Vatican Municipal United States are foreign corporations and don't own land, and currently living in fear 😨.

These foreign for profit Corporations are mirroring and impersonating you and your government while providing you governmental services, i.e., Department of Education (Miseducation), Department of Health, Department of Defense, Department of Justice etc. while stealing and pledging your global assets.

In other words, the Executive Suites of the CEO, CFO, COO, Chairman, President, Vice President of these corporations are employees, not Titleship/Owners.

Hell, they owe Quadrillions in Dividends and Derivatives to the Autochthonous Ancient Asiatic Families, which may be the real reason why 600 CEOs left their jobs.

In conclusion, White Supremacy and the Gatekeeping Anglo-Saxon Nazi Zionist Jews don't own anything nor control America's Financial and Economic System. North America's financial and economic system is owned by melanated people, by and through, AI, which has been around for decades via the Galactic Federation of Planets.

Intelligence rules the world, Ignorance bears the burden.

Sincerely,

Ernest Rauthschild

SideBar:

Notice the video sightings of so-called UFOs and Aliens appearing on Social Media, why the censorship of Black Aliens that look like U?

I gave you the 🗝️ now unlock the door and take your lawful ownership and executive seats within these Anti-DEI corporations.

[erebusvincent]

A bonkers new Texas bill would ban a bunch of activities related to abortion, including taking abortion pills in other states and facilitating or hosting online speech about procuring abortions. It would also hold all abortion pill manufacturers liable for violations when a specific manufacturer could not be ascertained.

"Wait—that's all constitutional?" you might be wondering. To which I say: Ha! This is clearly a bill unburdened by thoughts of constitutionality.

Texas Rep. Steve Toth (R–The Woodlands) introduced the legislation, which is called the Women and Child Safety Act. "If passed, the law would allow citizens to bring civil suits against internet service providers that don't block [certain] websites," writes the feminist pundit Jessica Valenti on Substack.

The Women and Child Safety Act lists six specific websites that must be blocked, but its intended reach is much, much broader. If it were to become law, it would give all sorts of internet service providers a strong incentive to block all sorts of speech related to abortion—a huge chilling effect on legal expression…

[jowi8597]

Jeanswest statement against the infringement of brand's intellectual rights ‼️

241111 Jeanswest official statement ‼️

Statement

On November 10, our company received consumer feedback and market monitoring information indicating that an unauthorized clothing product was being sold under the JEANSWEST brand name without proper authorization. We immediately launched an internal investigation and have verified the situation. This conduct not only severely infringes on our intellectual property rights but has also caused significant damage to the reputation and market image of the JEANSWEST brand. We hereby issue the following statement:

Our legal and market departments conducted a joint investigation and confirmed that the involved Douyin shop, Qinghe County Jiamian Clothing and Apparel Co., Ltd. (Douyin account name: JEANSWEST Flagship Store), is selling clothing products that are not produced or authorized by the JEANSWEST brand. The merchant engaged in unauthorized procurement and used the JEANSWEST name for sales, constituting an act of infringement. According to the relevant laws and regulations on intellectual property protection in China, this behavior not only violates the trademark rights and exclusive rights of the JEANSWEST brand but also severely disrupts the brand's image and market order.

Since its establishment, JEANSWEST has been committed to providing high-quality products and services to consumers. This infringement incident has not only harmed consumers' legitimate rights but has also caused immeasurable negative effects on the image, credibility, and market reputation of the JEANSWEST brand. We strongly condemn this behavior.

In response to this infringement, JEANSWEST has initiated legal proceedings against the involved merchant, demanding through legal means that the merchant immediately cease the infringement, destroy all infringing products, and compensate for the economic and reputational damage caused to the brand.

We call on consumers, partners, and the public to pay attention and stand against intellectual property infringement. We sincerely welcome public supervision and aim to uphold a fair, just, and orderly market environment.

New Trade (China) Limited Aurora Trading (China) Co., Ltd.

November 11, 2024

It's about the reseller account on Douyin who was noticed to sell clothes with unauthorized graphics - below 👇

[i-identify-tanks-in-posts]

A hypothetical scenario for you.

You have become the newest defense minister of the small nation of Elbonia.

The nation has begun a rearmament program, and you have been tasked with procuring the best main battle tank for the nation.

However, you are secretly a traitor working to sabotage Elbonia from within. Your real goal is to convince the Elbonian Army to accept a tank that will cripple them militarily - but it must be one that will appear good enough to be adopted, so you must be able to justify why it's "good".

There are three scenarios here:

1) during or just after WW2

2) Mid-70s, early-80s, height of the Cold War

3) 2024, present day

What do you pick, why, and how do you sell it while covering up it's flaws?

Ok.

Scenario 1) Panzer V "Panther". On the surface, and on paper, if you don't look too close, the Panther seems like a perfectly servicable medium tank, more than a match for the average medium tank of the time.

However, the transmission and engine are closer to the legal definition of a destructive device than the shells are. (A common problem with German medium and heavy tanks of the time.)

Scenario 2) probably an m551 or a stock T-80. Both seem promising on the face of things, but are really nothing more than hot garbage.

Scenario 3) Challenger 2. While the Challenger 2 is a capable tank, it is a very logistics-heavy tank, and the damned thing is nearly 3 decades old without many meaningful upgrades in its time. For an (assumedly) small nation like Elbonia, the Challenger 2 will prove a massive financial drain, and a logistical nightmare.

[iyenterprise2]

IY Enterprise is a premier agency providing unmatched certificate attestation services in Mumbai with an impeccable track record in UAE embassy attestation, Kuwait embassy attestation, and a robust suite of attestation services catering to the diverse needs of individuals and entities. Recognized for their meticulous Kuwait attestation process and comprehensive Qatar embassy attestation, IY Enterprise sets the standard in legalizing documents for use in the international arena.

The proficiency of IY Enterprise in facilitating Qatar certificate attestation exemplifies their broad spectrum of services, making them the preferred choice for individuals requiring apostille services near them. With a relentless focus on client satisfaction, IY Enterprise delivers on its promise of high-caliber apostille attestation, becoming synonymous with dependable apostille services for personal, educational, and commercial documents.

Located in the bustling heart of Mumbai, IY Enterprise extends its MOFA Attestation in Mumbai to ensure that no stone is left unturned when meeting the legal requirements of certificate authentication. They also specialize in document translation services in India, bridging language barriers with their certified translation services. Their commitment to excellence is evident in their ability to procure a police clearance certificate in Mumbai, thus, facilitating a smoother transition for clients embarking on international endeavors.

The provision of PCC attestation for Bhopal in Mumbai is a testimony to their extensive service outreach, and the MEA Attestation in Mumbai underscores their adeptness in navigating the intricacies of document legalization. With their wide-ranging Document Apostille Services in India, they maintain prolific stature in the realm of document authentication.

IY Enterprise HRD attestation services are critical for validating educational credentials, ensuring they are recognized by foreign authorities. This particular service highlights their keen attention to detail and their understanding of the protocols involved in the authentication process. Moreover, their certificate attestation services in India epitomize their commitment to integrity and excellence, ensuring a smooth and secure experience for all clients.

From the initial consultation to the final delivery of attested documents, IY Enterprise's professional team works tirelessly to provide prompt, accurate, and legally-compliant services. Whether one requires attestation for professional, educational, or personal documents, IY Enterprise stands ready to surpass expectations with their reliable, swift, and hassle-free attestation services, making them a trusted partner in document legalization and a mainstay for anyone seeking certificate attestation Services in Mumbai.

[ukrfeminism]

An unprecedented number of women are being investigated by police on suspicion of illegally ending a pregnancy, the BBC has been told.

Abortion provider MSI says it knows of up to 60 criminal inquiries in England and Wales since 2018, compared with almost zero before.

Some investigations followed natural pregnancy loss, File on 4 found.

Pregnancy loss is investigated only if credible evidence suggests a crime, the National Police Chiefs' Council says.

File on 4 has spoken to women who say that they have been "traumatised" and left feeling "suicidal" following criminal investigations lasting years.

Speaking for the first time, one woman described how she had been placed under investigation after giving birth prematurely, despite maintaining that she had never attempted an abortion.

In England, Scotland and Wales, abortion is legal up to 24 weeks with the approval of two doctors. However, after 10 weeks the procedure must be carried out in an approved clinic or NHS hospital.

Outside of these circumstances, deliberately ending a pregnancy remains a criminal offence in England and Wales under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, which carries a maximum punishment of life in prison.

Dr Jonathan Lord, medical director at MSI, which is one of the UK's main abortion providers, believes the "unprecedented" number of women now falling under investigation may be linked to the police's increased awareness of the availability of the "pills by post" scheme - introduced in England and Wales during the Covid-19 lockdown. Scotland also introduced a similar programme.

These "telemedicine" schemes, which allow pregnancies up to 10 weeks to be terminated at home, remain in effect.

The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), the UK's other main abortion provider, says it has received more than two dozen police requests for the medical records of women who have enquired about an abortion.

In March, MPs are due to vote on an amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill that would fully decriminalise abortion in England and Wales.

'I just froze'

File on 4 spoke to Katie (not her real name), who has been under investigation for several years for illegally procuring an abortion.

She says she believed that she was approximately seven weeks pregnant when she contacted a provider and received abortion pills through the post.

After taking the pills at home, Katie says she went into labour and gave birth to a stillborn baby. She later realised the pregnancy had progressed beyond the 24-week limit.

"After I gave birth I just froze - nothing will ever prepare you for something like that," she says.

"I didn't know what to do. I just kept thinking: 'How did this happen? How did I not know?'"

Katie was taken to hospital, where staff called the police. She was arrested on suspicion of self-inducing an abortion illegally and held in police custody before she was released on bail.

MSI's Dr Lord says criminal investigations and prosecutions further "traumatise" women after abortions, and that women like Katie deserve "compassion" rather than "punishment".

"These women are often vulnerable and in desperate situations - they need help, and prosecuting them is not the way to do that," he says.

Katie could face a prison sentence. She maintains that she had no idea that she was over the legal time limit when she took the pills - she says she was still having regular periods and had not put on any weight.

"Being under investigation, it's such a long process and months go past without you hearing anything," she says.

"I have genuinely felt suicidal at times because of it."

Melanie McDonagh, a journalist who has written widely about abortion and believes abortion should not be fully decriminalised, says the rise in police investigations is a consequence of "pills by post" and called for in-person consultations to be reintroduced at clinics.

"If we return to the situation before telemedicine in 2020, then there would be a guard against most of these cases happening in the first place," she says.

'Outdated law'

Abortion providers say the 1861 law that makes abortion a criminal offence is no longer fit for purpose - and the increase in cases being investigated means they want abortion to be fully decriminalised.

In Scotland, abortion is criminalised under common law. Abortion was fully decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2020.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) says prosecutions under the law are rare: "We carefully consider the personal circumstances of those who end their pregnancy outside the legal parameters and address these as sensitively as possible.

"Our prosecutors have a duty to ensure that laws set by Parliament are properly considered and applied when making difficult charging decisions."

Only four women have gone on to be convicted of procuring an illegal abortion in the past 20 years. One of these women, Carla Foster, was jailed in June last year.

Another woman, Bethany Cox, was cleared of the same charge in January. Since December 2022, four more women in England have appeared in court under the law. Charges were dropped against one and discontinued in another case, while two women face a potential trial.

In some cases, women have been reported to police on suspicion of having an illegal abortion by healthcare workers, including midwives.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) issued new guidance to medical professionals in January, urging them not to report women to police if they suspected they may have illegally ended their pregnancies.

RCOG said it was concerned that "traumatised" women were being prosecuted after abortions.

But abortion providers MSI and BPAS say this does not go far enough, because women can still be subject to criminal investigation if they are reported by someone else.

However, Melanie McDonagh says health professionals should not be discouraged from contacting police and that they have a "responsibility" to both the woman and the foetus.

MPs are set to vote on the amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill that would decriminalise abortion next month. It will become law if approved by both the House of Commons and the Lords,

Those who coerce women into abortions against their will would not be protected from prosecution if it passes.

Labour MP Diana Johnson, who tabled the amendment, says it would bring England and Wales into line with Northern Ireland.

But opponents of the proposed law change say it sets a dangerous precedent.

Melanie McDonagh says changing the law would be "disastrous".

She says: "If abortion was decriminalised, we would have more cases of women having abortions beyond the legal limit.

"We should be doing everything in our power to discourage this, and the law acts as a deterrent."

'Treated like criminals'

File on 4 has also found evidence of women falling under suspicion of illegally ending a pregnancy following a natural pregnancy loss - rather than taking pills - or premature birth.

Sammy, who lives with her husband and teenage son in the north of England, says she decided to have an abortion after falling pregnant last year.

But staff at the abortion clinic told Sammy she was over the legal 24-week time limit.

"I was all over the place, I searched for information about adoption and abortion," she says.

Even though abortion pills would not have been medically safe or legal to take, she says she did at one point put abortion tablets in her online basket and researched information about abortion methods as well as adoption.

She says, though, that she did not go through with the purchase of the tablets, deciding instead to come to terms with continuing the pregnancy.

But six days later, she says she started to feel unwell and realised she was going into premature labour.

Her son was born at home over three months premature, weighing only 1lb 5oz (700g).

"He was blue in colour, he wasn't breathing, so I had to start CPR on him," she says.

While she previously had wanted a termination, "that didn't mean I didn't want him to survive" after he was born, she says - and he did survive.

Sammy's husband called 999 and police and paramedics arrived. After Sammy was taken to hospital, her husband was arrested on suspicion of procuring an illegal abortion. She was told she needed to be interviewed at the police station.

"We were treated like criminals from the get-go, but we'd done nothing wrong," she says.

Sammy's husband was released on bail, but they both remained under police investigation for over a year.

Last month, Sammy was told police were dropping the investigation because of a lack of evidence.

Dr Lord said that in another case, a teenager was investigated by hospital staff after a pregnancy loss because she had previously contacted an abortion provider.

He said: "This is a national scandal, which I think we will look back on in years to come and think, how was this allowed to happen?"

The police force that handled Sammy's case said officers who arrived at her house had identified information to suggest that a crime may have been committed and a "thorough" investigation was required.

It said no-one involved would face any further police action.

Sammy says although she is relieved, she is still dealing with the impact of the investigation on her mental health.

"I still don't sleep properly because I'm still constantly worrying about being taken away," she says.

"I think without the support of my family, I wouldn't still be here."