#Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code

[dbpnews]

Exchanges seek prompt information on companies facing IBC - Times of India

Exchanges seek prompt information on companies facing IBC – Times of India

MUMBAI: Aimed at enhancing information flow about listed companies undergoing corporate resolution under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the bourses on Friday said that all resolution professionals (RPs) must follow Sebi’s disclosure norms applicable to all listed entities. Currently, although RPs (the court-appointed persons who carry out the resolution process) are required to disclose…

[nilnews4]

Ordinance soon: Cabinet OKs proposal to amend IBC New Delhi: The cabinet approved a proposal to amend the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC…

[hummingzone]

Change in IBC paves way for prepack solutions for the MSME sector

Change in IBC paves way for prepack solutions for the MSME sector

India Friday notified changes to the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code framework that paves the way for pre-packs for the MSME sector. The notification was issued after the IBC amendment bill approved by the Parliament received presidential assent. ET looks at the provisions closely WHAT IS PRE-PACK RESOLUTION? Pre-pack is a hybrid corporate rescue process It blends elements & virtues of both formal…

[go-21newstv]

Delhi High Court Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against Anil Ambani Upon SBI’s Claims Anil Ambani is facing bankruptcy proceedings The Delhi High Court on Thursday stayed proceedings in a case under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Anil Ambani in a matter related to a personal guarantee given by him against a loan taken by Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL) from State Bank of India (SBI).

[newstox]

Delhi High Court Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against Anil Ambani Upon SBI’s Claims Anil Ambani is facing bankruptcy proceedings The Delhi High Court on Thursday stayed proceedings in a case under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Anil Ambani in a matter related to a personal guarantee given by him against a loan taken by Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL) from State Bank of India (SBI).

[newzzhub]

Delhi High Court Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against Anil Ambani Upon SBI’s Claims Anil Ambani is facing bankruptcy proceedings The Delhi High Court on Thursday stayed proceedings in a case under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Anil Ambani in a matter related to a personal guarantee given by him against a loan taken by Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL) from State Bank of India (SBI).

[newsupdated]

Delhi High Court Stays Insolvency Proceedings Against Anil Ambani Upon SBI’s Claims Anil Ambani is facing bankruptcy proceedings The Delhi High Court on Thursday stayed proceedings in a case under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Anil Ambani in a matter related to a personal guarantee given by him against a loan taken by Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom) and Reliance Infratel Ltd (RITL) from State Bank of India (SBI).

[meripustak]

Companies Act with Rules (Amendment) Act 2018

Companies Act with Rules (Amendment) Act 2018

Companies Act with Rules (Amendment) Act 2018 Companies Act with Rules (Amendment) Act 2018: As amended by Companies (Amendment) Act 2017 & Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act 2018 With Section-wise Analysis of Companies (Amdt.) Act 2017 Incorporating Annotated Text of Companies Act 2013 [As amended by Companies (Amendment) Act 2017] & Rules framed thereunder Annotated text of Insolvency…

[guptachandanassociates]

Surety’s Right of Subrogation and Insolvency amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Surety’s Right of Subrogation and Insolvency amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016

In the case of State Bank of India Vs.V.Ramakrishnanamp;ors. the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held that there was no bar for a creditor to proceed against a surety for recovery of dues even during the moratorium period declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency amp;Bankruptcy Code,2016 (Code).In the case of State Bank of India Vs.V.Ramakrishnanamp;ors. the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India held…

[releasesoon]

NCLAT seeks details of IL&FS dues to lenders from the newly appointed board

NCLAT seeks details of IL&FS dues to lenders from the newly appointed board

[ad_1]

New Delhi: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on Friday asked the government and the debt-ridden IL&FS to submit details of assets and liabilities of 13 entities of the group.

A two-member bench headed by Chairman Justice S J Mukhopadhaya asked the IL&FS group to submit the details of four ‘amber’ entities — Hazribagh Ranchi…

[advertphoto]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/

[thequeenofqueens-blog]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/

[leaengler]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/

[winniegist]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/

[lewispascual]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/

[disneyprincesspatrickstump]

What is a Fraudulent Transfer in Bankruptcy?

A fraudulent transfer can basically be defined as transferring property out of your name to delay or defraud a creditor. If you “sell” a home worth $1 million to your Uncle Joe for just $1 dollar because a creditor is breathing down your neck, you’ve likely triggered state and federal fraudulent conveyance statutes. In Utah, the statute is 6 years from the date of transfer according to a Bankruptcy attorney.

What is constructive fraud?

There are two types of fraudulent transfers. Actual fraud involves transferring property with the actual intent to defraud creditors. Constructive fraud involves a transfer that is made for grossly inadequate consideration, such as the “sale” to Uncle Joe in the example above, which supplies a presumption of fraud even absent direct proof.

The structure of constructive fraud in bankruptcy includes two parts:

a lack of “reasonably equivalent value” and

a sign of financial distress

Signs of financial distress are being insolvent or rendered insolvent, unreasonably small capital, and incurring debts beyond the ability to pay as they mature.

In Bankruptcy, the Trustee Can Sue to Unwind the Transfer

Once a property transfer is deemed fraudulent, either because there is proof of fraud or the sale price is too low, the trustee may attempt to recover the property, or the value of the property, and make it part of the bankruptcy estate. This is done through filing a lawsuit.

In our example with Uncle Joe, if you transferred your house to Joe for $1 and then filed bankruptcy, the trustee would serve Joe with a complaint seeking to recover the value of the home. If the conveyance is then found to be fraudulent, you’ll lose your right to claim an exemption for the property.

The trustee may recover the property from either the immediate recipient (Joe) or from anyone else to whom the property was subsequently transferred (perhaps a cousin). An exception is the bona fide purchaser rule. A bona fide purchaser is one who acted in good faith to purchase the property without notice of the outstanding rights of others to the property. The bona fide purchaser has the right to retain the property.

The Look Back Period for a Fraudulent Transfer

How long can a trustee look back in time to find a fraudulent conveyance?

Under the Bankruptcy Code, the look back period is two years; however, the trustee may use state law if the allowed look back period is longer. Many states, including Florida and Massachusetts, have adopted the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), which allows creditors to look back four years to find a fraudulent conveyance. Some states implement an older version of UFTA called the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (UFCA).

In any case, if your state is a UFTA state, the trustee will then have a four-year period to try to unwind transfers that appear fraudulent. Note that some states will have longer look back periods. In New York, Minnesota, Michigan, and Maine, the look back period is six years. In Kentucky and Iowa, it’s five years.

The Bottom Line: Seek the Help of a Bankruptcy Attorney

Conveyance laws inside and outside of bankruptcy can be complicated. Seek the help of an experienced bankruptcy attorney before transferring property. If you’ve already transferred property that may be construed as constructive fraud, a bankruptcy lawyer can help you avoid negative consequences — namely, your bankruptcy being denied a discharge — by recovering the asset before you file for bankruptcy.

And remember, fraud — whether it is intentional or not — is not the only way to screw up your bankruptcy discharge. Destroying records, lying under oath, hiding property, and/or not being able to explain why certain property is missing from your bankruptcy estate are other big reasons a bankruptcy can fail. Be smart and be honest with the bankruptcy court. The last thing you want to do is waste your precious time and money filing a bankruptcy case that will be denied — and you certainly don’t want to go to jail for bankruptcy fraud.

Free Consultation with Bankruptcy Lawyer

If you have a bankruptcy question, or need to file a bankruptcy case, call Ascent Law now at (801) 676-5506. Attorneys in our office have filed over a thousand cases. We can help you now. Come in or call in for your free initial consultation.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews

Recent Posts

Can the Bank Take My Home in Bankruptcy?

Legal Representation is Important to Winning Child Custody

Are Out of State Court Decisions Good in Utah Divorce Cases?

Tips for Effectively Using Your Business Lawyer

Bankruptcy on Medical Debt

Bankruptcy from Start to Finish

Source: http://www.ascentlawfirm.com/what-is-a-fraudulent-transfer-in-bankruptcy/