Tumgik
#Gwen Siegel
mars-rnr · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Please read Rogue Sun just for Traumatized Boy and Murderous Mom, or do it for ME
I need to know there are other here who are fascinated by these characters
5 notes · View notes
the-legendaryboi · 16 hours
Text
Gwen was so cynical about being compassionate, even though it is the compassion she tried to teach to her son that makes him desire not to murder his foes but to show mercy.
His best parts are his mother and so are his worse parts. Though we are given a lot of moments between Dylan and his father and the other people from his side of the family. Somehow his mother's influence shines through.
0 notes
lgbtqreads · 6 months
Text
Fave Five: Queer Fiction Set in the Medieval Era, Part I
Gwen and Art are Not in Love by Lex Croucher (YA) Emry Merlin by Robyn Schneider (YA) The Scottish Boy by Alex de Campi The Hild Sequence by Nicola Griffith Solomon’s Crown by Natasha Siegel Bonus: Coming up in 2024, Splinter & Ash by Marieke Nijkamp (MG) and Not for the Faint of Heart by Lex Croucher (YA)
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
24 notes · View notes
byneddiedingo · 1 year
Text
A Lon Chaney Double Feature
Tumblr media
Norma Shearer and Lon Chaney in He Who Gets Slapped
He Who Gets Slapped (Victor Sjöström, 1924)
Cast: Lon Chaney, Norma Shearer, John Gilbert, Ruth King, Marc McDermott, Ford Sterling, Tully Marshall. Screenplay: Carey Wilson, Victor Sjöström; titles: Marian Ainslee; based on a play by Leonid Andreyev. Cinematography: Milton Moore. Art direction: Cedric Gibbons. Film editing: Hugh Wynn.
He Who Gets Slapped is not a film for coulrophobes (people with a fear of clowns). It's crawling with them, performing antics that are supposed to be, to judge from the hilarity they induce in the audiences shown in the film, side-splittingly funny. The film seems to be based on the highly dubious premise that watching someone get slapped repeatedly is one of the funniest things ever. (There may be people who think so, to judge from the perennial popularity of the Three Stooges.) The whole movie is an artificial concoction, anyway, and only the brilliance of Lon Chaney gives it some grounding in real-life feeling. It was one of the films that launched the MGM studios on the road to Hollywood dominance, and the first one to feature Leo the Lion in the credits. It's also a film that contemporary audiences should watch to see the young Norma Shearer, when she was at her freshest and most natural. In He Who Gets Slapped, her love interest is John Gilbert. It was only after the advent of sound that Shearer's husband, MGM's creative director Irving G. Thalberg, decided to make her into a great lady, the cinematic equivalent of Katharine Cornell, putting her into remakes of Broadway hits like The Barretts of Wimpole Street (Sidney Franklin, 1934), which had starred Cornell, or Strange Interlude (Robert Z. Leonard, 1932), which had featured another theatrical diva, Lynn Fontanne. She is barely in her 20s in He Who Gets Slapped, however, and she's delightful, with no trace of the diva to come.
Tumblr media
Lon Chaney and Loretta Young in Laugh, Clown, Laugh
Laugh, Clown, Laugh, Herbert Brenon, 1928
Cast: Lon Chaney, Bernard Siegel, Loretta Young, Cissy Fitzgerald, Nils Asther, Gwen Lee. Screenplay: Elizabeth Meehan; titles: Joseph Farnham; based on a play by David Belasco and Tom Cushing. Cinematography: James Wong Howe. Art direction: Cedric Gibbons. Film editing: Marie Halvey.
Laugh, Clown, Laugh puts him in clown makeup again, but the film is a grand showcase for Chaney, whose reputation as the man of a thousand faces was somewhat misleading. He had one well-worn face that, no matter how much he distorted or disguised it, shone through. Here he's given an opportunity to perform without disguise through much of the film, and the range of expressions available to him is astonishing. The leading lady is 14-year-old Loretta Young. That she often looks her age is one of the more disturbing things about the film, in which she's supposed to be in love with both Chaney, who was 45, and the improbably pretty Nils Asther, who was 31. The cinematography is by James Wong Howe. Laugh, Clown, Laugh was eligible for Oscar nominations in the first year of the Academy Awards, and Chaney should have received one. The closest the film came to an award was the one that Joseph Farnham received for title writing (the one and only time the award was presented). But Farnham's award was for the body of his work over the nomination period, and not for a particular film.
5 notes · View notes
rainingmusic · 5 years
Video
youtube
Madonna - Holiday 
5 notes · View notes
revlyncox · 4 years
Text
Superhero Values (2021)
Whether we have great powers or simply great responsibilities, we return to our values to guide our actions. This talk was revised and expanded for the Washington Ethical Society, February 21, 2021. 
Earlier, you gave some advice to “Human Person” (a fictional superhero who “visited” earlier in the Platform) about compassion, understanding, and commitment, which are easier words to say than to practice. It helps to have role models, even if their stories didn’t happen exactly in the way they are told. It seems to me that mythology, fiction, and maybe even history can supply us with examples of values we can agree on. Stories that have captured our imaginations in the past may remind us of the people we hope to become.
When I was a kid, Batman was the lead character in some of those stories. He showed up in comic books and Pez dispensers, but the most influential form of Batman from my childhood was the Adam West character on television. When I was six or seven years old, the other kids who went to my babysitter and I used to run around the yard chasing super villains, pretending the basement steps were the Bat Cave, and generally doing our part for the good of Gotham City. We all traded roles as the heroes, heroines, and the various arch-nemeses.
I learned a couple of things from the Bat-team. I learned that superheroes have origin stories, events that changed the direction of their lives. You might not be able to tell from looking at them, especially in their secret identities, but every superhero has a past. The Bat-team also taught me that superheroes struggle with power. Whether the super skills come from hard work, cool gadgets, or another planet, heroes have to figure out the most effective and responsible way to use those skills. Finally, I learned that superheroes form coalitions. Batman and Robin and Batgirl worked together, not to mention Commissioner Gordon and Chief O’Hara. Even an independent vigilante needs other people for the toughest problems.
Come to think of it, those same things are true for all of us. Each of us has to decide how to respond to the past. Individually and as a group, we are faced with questions of power and responsibility. Teaming up with other people is a source of strength, in spite of and perhaps because of our differences. I think these characteristics of superheroes call attention to WES’s future as a community.
Heroes Have Origins
First, superheroes have origin stories. Some event from the past sparked the character’s discovery of talents and passions, leading to a new sense of identity and purpose. Those events might be associated with death or separation from a loved one, or with the loss of the character’s pre-heroic dreams.
Superman’s powers come from his extra-planetary birth, but his ideas about truth, justice, and the American way come from Martha and Jonathan Kent. There is some speculation that Superman’s creators (Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster) modeled him after Moses, a baby whose people faced destruction, and was carried in a small vessel to a land where his birth identity had to be concealed.
There is a category of stories in which the characters have qualities that were typical in their place of origin, but something called them to help people in a world similar to our own, where their profound difference turned out to be a gift. Wonder Woman, Black Panther, AquaMan, and Valkyrie fall into this category.
On the other hand, some superheroes start off with an event of pain or trauma, like Peter Parker’s radioactive spider bite to become Spiderman. Batman’s path is a response to trauma. In the Watchmen mini-series on HBO, one of the characters’ commitment to justice came from being a survivor of the 1921 white supremacist attack on Tulsa, Oklahoma. Ms. Marvel’s Kamala Khan is mainly in this category, having gained her powers during an unusual event.
Whatever the story, most extra-human comic book characters have faced a life-changing event that seems to isolate them from important people in their lives. Often, the character will acquire or discover or place new value on a gift or a talent they have during that experience. Picking up these pieces of loss, loneliness, and strength, the character eventually forges a new sense of purpose.
Michael Servetus (Miguel Serveto) is someone from history whose story follows this pattern a bit. He wasn’t always brave, and he wasn’t known for being kind, but he did set himself apart and commit his life to the truth as he saw it. I wouldn’t necessarily call him a Humanist, but he was a free thinker in that he defied the orthodoxy of his time, and his sacrifices made it possible for the people who came after him to do even more questioning of creeds, dogmas, and oppressive religious organizations.
When Servetus read the Bible for himself for the first time as a young student in the 1520s, he was shocked to discover no evidence for the doctrine of the Trinity. In 1531, he published a tract, De Trinitatis Erroribus (On the Errors of the Trinity), seemingly convinced that people would see it his way if only they would listen. That’s not what happened. He was run out of town, his books were confiscated, and the Supreme Council of the Inquisition started looking for him.
This is where the secret identity comes in. Servetus fled to Paris and assumed the name of Michel de Villeneuve. He had a varied career as de Villeneuve, first as an editor and publisher, then as a doctor. He worked on a seven-volume edition of the Bible, adding insightful footnotes. He was the first European to publish about the link between the pulmonary and respiratory systems.
During his time as the personal physician for the Archbishop of Vienne, he secretly worked on his next theological treatise, Christianismi Restitutio (The Restoration of Christianity). He also struck up a correspondence with his old classmate, John Calvin. Servetus was not diplomatic in his criticisms of Calvin’s writing, and Calvin broke off correspondence. Servetus seemed to think that their exchange was illuminating, because he included copies of the letters when he sent an advance copy of the Restitutio to Geneva.  
The publication of the Restitutio in 1553 marked the end of Servetus’ secret identity. Both Protestant and Catholic authorities pursued him as a dangerous heretic. He was burned at the stake on October 27, 1553, by the order of The Council of Geneva. Reportedly, he maintained his beliefs until the end, shouting heretical prayers from the flames. The Catholic Inquisition in France burned Servetus in effigy a few months later. There were a lot of people who didn’t want his ideas to be heard. Luckily for us, a few copies of his books were preserved, and went on to generate new ideas among religious reformers for over 450 years.
Now, I’m not saying Michael Servetus was a superhero. It might be hard to identify with him in some ways. Though he had ideas that were called Unitarian at the time, Unitarian Universalists oday would disagree with most of what he wrote, as would most Ethical Culturists. His creeds don’t match most of our beliefs; though some of his deeds, such as challenging authority and being a medical provider, might resonate. Nevertheless, we can see how a turning point in someone’s life can bring isolation, energy, purpose, abilities, and vulnerabilities, all at the same time. His origins were more like Spiderman than Superman: Being in the right place at the right time, Servetus was bitten by the free thinking bug. He had to adopt an alter ego, but the bug also afforded him the drive and the insight to make great contributions to scholarship and religious freedom.
How often is it the same for those of us who are regular folks? The events that make us who we are may bring a sense of loss or loneliness. These same events may bring a chance for us to develop new talents, or personal connection to the work we aspire to do. Passion and vulnerability can come from a single point in time.
The thing that sets a superhero origin story apart from a villain origin story is how the character translates their past into a future of meaning and purpose. Most of us are not consistently villains or heroes; we have to choose in every moment how to draw from our past to make choices in the present. We can’t control the historical facts of our origin stories. Even if our own choices led to the turning points in our lives, they are in the past now. What we can do is bring our values to the way we understand those turning points, and to our decisions about what to do with the gifts we have now. Let’s do our best to choose to use our origins well.
Heroes Form Coalitions
The very first appearance of Spiderman (in Amazing Fantasy #15 in 1962) saw the teenage Peter Parker misusing his new powers, only to have his negligence contribute to the death of his Uncle Ben, one of his adoptive parents. Peter’s understanding of Ben’s teaching that “With great power there must also come—great responsibility!” shaped his character from then on. The spider counterparts from other universes, heroes like Gwen Stacy and Miles Morales, also have turning points on that theme.
Superhero characters struggling with power and responsibility would have benefitted from reading about James Luther Adams, who was a professor at Harvard during the 1950s and 1960s. Adams had a great deal to say about power and what that meant for the responsibilities of movements for liberation.
Between 1927 and the late 1930s, Adams made several trips to Germany, a country that was renowned for philosophical scholarship. He spoke with religious and academic leaders, was detained for questioning by the Gestapo, and developed a sense of urgency about the political, cultural, moral, and spiritual crisis that went along with the rise of the Nazi party. While Adams developed great respect for the anti-Nazi Confessing Church movement, he noticed that Germany’s churches as a whole were not pushing back against the crisis.
Adams said that individual and organized philosophy should be “examined.” There must be a path for critique, self-correction, and development. Adams wrote, “the achievement of freedom in community requires the power of organization and the organization of power.”
In that same period when Adams was noticing trends of power, organization, and responsibility in Germany, Humanists in the United States were also teaming up. The roots of some of these relationships went back to the Free Religious Association, which was the group where Felix Adler hung around with Ralph Waldo Emerson and the other Transcendentalists. The FRA led to another trend called the “Ethical Basis” group within Unitarianism.
I’m drawing here from The Humanist Way: An Introduction to Ethical Humanist Religion, a book by former WES Senior Leader Ed Ericson. Ericson writes that, by the end of the nineteenth century, the Ethical Basis bloc had successfully advocated that inclusion as either a member or a clergy person in Unitarian congregations be purely on an ethical basis rather than having any doctrinal basis. Ericson continues:
They resisted all attempts to impose any theological requirement, however broadly such a test might be construed. Like Felix Adler’s Ethical Culture, the Ethical Basis Unitarians regarded the dedicated ethical life to be inherently religious without any necessary underpinning of theological belief. This concurrence of views resulted in a close working relationship between the leaders of the Ethical Societies of Chicago and St. Louis and their ministerial counterparts in the Western Unitarian Conference.
(Ericson, The Humanist Way, p. 46-47)
Ericson goes on to say that, while this cohort was concentrated in the midwest, Octavius Brooks Frothingham in New York also largely shared Adler’s philosophy. Ericson also points out that the Ethical Basis cohort provided “a seedbed where organized religious Humanism, under that name, would first put down roots in American soil,” making this development of interest to Ethical Humanism. So, already at the turn of the century, there is some superhero teaming up going on. It gets better!
In 1913, the Unitarian minister John H. Dietrich began using the term “Humanism” to identify his non-theistic philosophy of religion. Dietrich said that he first encountered the term as a religious designation in the text of a lecture delivered to the London Ethical Society (Ericson, p. 61). Ericson writes that “the Ethical Union in Britain had described their movement by the turn of the century.” Ethical Culture in the United States started identifying more closely as a unique expression within the broader Humanist movement a little later, not until after Adler’s death in 1933. At that point, they found a whole league’s worth of Humanists to team up with.
But back to Dietrich, who discovered that his colleague Curtis Reese in Chicago was writing about the same kind of philosophy. Having found each other, they attracted others to the growing Humanist movement. By 1927, they had connected with scientists, philosophers, and journalists, who collectively were turning out what Ericson describes as “a torrent of books, articles, sermons and lectures” (p. 67) that established Humanism as a significant force in American society. In 1933, thirty-four of these prominent figures signed on to The Humanist Manifesto.
Later groups wrote the Humanist Manifesto II of 1973 and the Humanist Manifesto III of 2003. The original 1933 document set a historic precedent, bringing together people from a variety of perspectives and settings. Unitarian and Universalist ministers were well represented, along with V.T. Thayer, Director of the Ethical Culture Schools of New York, plus A. Eustace Haydon and Lester Mondale, who later became Ethical leaders (Ericson, p. 70).
I would suggest that the Washington Ethical Society, by affiliating with both the Unitarian Universalist Association and the American Ethical Union, is living out the spirit of cooperation that has powered the Humanist movement in the United States from its inception. Ethical Humanism is a unique expression and tradition within the larger Humanist movement, and yet that larger movement remains important for understanding who we are and what we are here to do. We come to a deeper understanding of identity and mission when we team up.
In fiction, superheroes seem to gravitate to one another. From the X-Men to the Avengers to the Teen Titans, collections of lead characters become ensembles. They have very different abilities and outlooks. Teaming up isn’t always easy, and it can be risky. Household squabbles may become epic battles if super abilities get out of hand. However, when they combine their gifts in the same direction, they can tackle complex problems that none of them would be able to handle alone.
This is why we form coalitions, too. WES is a community of people who have many differences in your individual lives. Diversity in creed and unity in deed, WES members are able to learn together, make music together, serve the community, and witness for justice, without worrying too much about who is an atheist or an agnostic or a theist or a polytheist. Whether among members, or in coalition with our neighbors across religious or geographic lines, we are able to put differences aside as we work for the benefit of our shared community. It does happen, though, that human beings forget, or retreat into what we think is a bubble of sameness, or narrow our scope of what seems possible.
Let’s build on what is already going well as we resist the shrinking of our horizons. There may be partners in our community that we have yet to meet. There may be institutes for exceptional heroes, or halls of justice, that we have to overcome our internalized hurdles of classism and racism before we can join.
At the very least, we can ensure that we’re making the most of our super team here at WES. Like the superheroes, we can do more and support each other when we come together.
Conclusion
There is a lot that WES has in common with an assembly of superheroes. Each one of us has an origin story, a set of events that shaped our talents, passions, and vulnerabilities. Each one of us has the opportunity to shape that story into a life of meaning and purpose. Like superheroes, it is incumbent on us to come to terms with power. Our collective abilities and assets make us a force to be reckoned with, and it is up to us to do the moral discernment to make sure we’re doing a good job wielding that power. Our honesty with each other and practicing all of our shared values and commitments will help. Like the best superheroes, we form alliances. Within the WES community, we share our specialized powers and support one another to accomplish goals none of us could handle alone. In our coalitions with other groups, we build bridges that support compassion. May all that has been divided be made whole.
May it be so.
3 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
TWELVE DAYS OF CHRISTMAS MIRACLES DAYS ONE & TWO ( BODY SWITCH ): back  again by popular demand it’s a day of body changing. just like always, you’ll have all the memories of your host body. once again we’ve given everyone a new, unique pairing, and like last year we’ve entered open characters into the mix and some swaps aren’t reciprocal. below you’ll find each character listed and the fc used. the arrow will indicate whose body they are in, and that does not mean that person is in theirs. let us know if you have any questions, otherwise, welcome to the whacky world of waking up as someone else.
abigail brand →   jean-paul beaubier ( fc: matthew daddario ) alex summers →  tabitha smith ( fc: hailee steinfeld ) america chavez →  xandra neramani ( fc: kaylee bryant ) amka aliyak → nadia van dyne ( fc: zoey deutch ) betsy braddock → alex summers ( fc: oliver jackson cohen ) billy kaplan → teddy altman ( fc: cody christian ) bobby drake →  jimmy hudson ( fc: liam hemsworth ) bobby drake (older) → older hank mccoy ( fc: karl urban ) bucky barnes → yelena belova ( fc: florence pugh ) bucky barnes (616) → veronica eden ( fc: victoria pedretti ) carol danvers → sam wilson ( fc: anthony mackie ) charles xavier → moira mactaggart ( fc: thandie newton ) clint barton → kate bishop ( fc: camila mendes ) crystalia amaquelin → pietro maximoff ( fc: aaron taylor-johnson ) daken → jeanne-marie beaubier ( fc: phoebe tonkin ) danielle moonstar → rahne sinclair ( fc: sophie skelton ) drax → peter quill ( fc: derek theler ) emma frost → kate pryde ( fc: zoe kravitz ) erik lehnsherr → charles xavier ( fc: idris elba ) felicia hardy → michelle jones ( fc: zendaya ) gamora → mantis ( fc: pom klementieff ) gerry drew → jessica drew ( fc: inbar lavi ) gwenpool → v special body. can’t participate.  gwen stacy → peter parker ( fc: tom holland ) gwen stacy (65) → miles morales ( fc: jordan fisher ) illyana rasputin → older scott summers ( fc: matt bomer ) hank mccoy → bobby drake ( fc: dylan o’brien ) hank mccoy (older) → betsy braddock ( fc: jodie comer ) james rogers → tommy shepherd ( fc: gregg sulkin ) jean grey → hank mccoy ( taron egertonn ) jean grey (older) → logan howlett ( hugh jackman ) jean-paul beaubier → abigail brand ( fc: crystal reed ) jeanne-marie beaubier → daken ( fc: charles melton ) jessica drew → clint barton ( fc: chris pine ) jimmy hudson → laura kinney ( fc: lulu antariksa ) julian keller → lana baumgarter ( fc: danielle rose russell ) kamala khan → scott summers ( fc: steven r mcqueen ) kate bishop → america chavez ( fc: lindsey morgan ) kate pryde → emma frost ( fc: margot robbie ) lana baumgartner → lori baumgartner ( fc: anne hathaway ) laura kinney → julian keller ( fc: noah centineo ) loki laufayson → rosalind solomon ( fc: ana de armas ) lorna dane → rogue ( fc: eiza gonzalez ) michelle jones → gwen stacy ( fc: olivia holt ) miles morales → 65 gwen stacy ( fc: jenny boyd ) moira mactaggert → her body is taken, but moira is nowhere to be found. nadia van dyne → amka aliyak ( fc: anna lambe ) natasha romanoff → bucky barnes ( fc: sebastian stan ) nathan summers → esme cuckoo ( fc: skyler samuels ) peter parker → tony stark ( fc: robert downey jr ) peter quill → gamora ( fc: zoe saldana ) pietro maximoff → crystalia amaquelin ( fc: holland roden ) rahne sinclair → danielle moonstar ( fc: devery jacobs ) remy lebeau → lorna dane ( fc: paulina singer ) ripley ryan → carol danvers ( fc: rebecca rittenhouse ) rogue → remy lebeau ( fc: jack falahee ) rosalind solomon → thor odinson ( fc: chris hemsworth ) sam alexander → tiana toomes ( fc: brittany o’grady ) sam wilson → steve rogers ( fc: chris evans ) scott summers → illyana rasputin ( fc: kristine froseth ) scott summers (older) → older jean grey ( fc: rachel mcadams ) stepford, esme → quentin quire ( fc: dane dehaan ) stephen strange → wanda maximoff ( fc: elizabeth olsen ) steve rogers → natasha romanoff ( fc: scarlet johansson ) susan storm → stephen strange ( fc: benedict cumberbatch ) tabitha smith → nathan summers ( fc: thomas doherty ) theodore altman → billy kaplan ( fc: nick robinson ) thor odinson → rocket raccoon ( fc: raccoon ) tiana toomes → sam alexander ( fc: alberto rosende ) tommy shepherd → james rogers ( fc: dominic sherwood ) tony stark → teenaged morgan stark ( fc: katherine langford ) valkyrie → loki laufayson ( fc: tom hiddleston ) veronica eden → felicia hardy ( fc: emeraude toubia ) wanda maximoff → erik lehnsherr ( fc: giancarlo esposito ) xandra neramani → cal’syee neramani ( fc: kate siegel ) yelena belova → 616 bucky barnes ( fc: richard madden )
5 notes · View notes
maaarine · 5 years
Text
MBTI Typing Index: Names Q-T
Name starts with: A B, C D, E F,  G H, I J K L, M N O P, Q R S T, U V W X Y Z.
Christian QUESADA (ESTJ)
Sara QUIN (ENTP)
Tegan QUIN (ENTP)
Zoë QUINN (INFP)
Daniel RADCLIFFE (ENFP)
Dennis RADER (ISTJ)
Charlotte RAMPLING (INFJ)
Gordon RAMSAY (ESTJ)
Giuliana RANCIC (ESFJ)
Ayn RAND (ISTJ)
Megan RAPINOE (ESTP)
Naval RAVIKANT (INTJ)
Jeremy RENNER (ISTP)
Raphaëlle RICCI (INTJ)
Damien RICE (INFP)
Tim RICE-OXLEY (INFJ)
Keith RICHARDS (ESTP)
Jon RICHARDSON (INTJ)
Alan RICKMAN (INTJ)
Tom RIDGEWELL (ENTP)
Ransom RIGGS (INFP)
Rihanna / Robyn FENTY (ESTP)
Guy RITCHIE (ENTJ)
Joan RIVERS (ESFP)
Robert REDFORD (INFJ)
Vanessa REDGRAVE (INFJ)
Eddie REDMAYNE (INFP)
Norman REEDUS (ISFP)
Keanu REEVES (ISFP)
Ryan REYNOLDS (ENTP)
Trent REZNOR (INFP)
Shonda RHIMES (ENFJ)
Mel ROBBINS (ENTJ)
Michel ROCARD (ENTJ)
Dennis RODMAN (ESTP)
Olivia RODRIGO (ESFJ)
Michelle RODRIGUEZ (ESTP)
Joe ROGAN (ESTP)
Seth ROGEN (ENTP)
Fred ROGERS (INFP)
Maggie ROGERS (INFP)
Cristiano RONALDO (ESTP)
Mark RONSON (ISFP)
Sally ROONEY (INFJ)
Arden ROSE (ENFP)
Tracee Ellis ROSS (ENFP)
Eric ROTH (INFJ)
Philip ROTH (ENTP)
Kristen ROUPENIAN (ENFP)
Mickey ROURKE (ESTP)
Joanne K. ROWLING (INFJ)
Arundhati ROY (INFJ)
Mark RUFFALO (ISFP)
RuPaul / RuPaul CHARLES (ENFP)
Bertrand RUSSELL (ENTP)
Winona RYDER (INFP)
Mark RYLANCE (INFP)
Anna SACCONE JOLY (ISFJ)
Jonathan SACCONE JOLY (ESFP)
Oliver SACKS (INFP)
Sade / Sade ADU (ISFP)
Claire SAFFITZ (ENFJ)
Sebastião SALGADO (INFJ)
Jonas SALK (INTJ)
Sheryl SANDBERG (ENFJ)
Thomas SANDERS (ENFP)
Adam SANDLER (ESTP)
Susan SARANDON (ENFP)
Michel SARDOU (ESTJ)
Anita SARKEESIAN (ENFJ)
Nicolas SARKOZY (ESTJ)
Jean-Paul SARTRE (INTP)
Marjane SATRAPI (ENFP)
Reshma SAUJANI (ENFJ)
Adam SAVAGE (ENTP)
Antonin SCALIA (ESTJ)
Matthias SCHOENAERTS (ISTP)
Amy SCHUMER (ENFP)
Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER (ENTJ)
Andrew SCOTT (INFP)
Ridley SCOTT (ENTJ)
Roy SCRANTON (INTJ)
Roger SCRUTON (INTJ)
John SEARLE (ENTP)
Amy SEDARIS (ENFP)
David SEDARIS (INTP)
Jerry SEINFELD (ENTJ)
Jason SEGEL (ENFP)
Léa SEYDOUX (ISFP)
Elif SHAFAK (INFP)
Faiza SHAHEEN (ENFJ)
Yara SHAHIDI (ENFJ)
Shakira / Shakira RIPOLL (ESFJ)
Tupac SHAKUR (ENFP)
Michael SHANNON (ISTP)
Ben SHAPIRO (ESTJ)
Maria SHARAPOVA (ENTJ)
Robert SHEEHAN (ENFP)
Michael SHEEN (ENFP)
Judith SHEINDLIN (ESTJ)
Dax SHEPARD (ENTP)
Amy SHERMAN-PALLADINO (ENFP)
Kiernan SHIPKA (ESFJ)
David SHRIGLEY (INTP)
SIA / Sia FURLER (ENFP)
Daniel SIEGEL (INFJ)
Jason SILVA (ENFP)
Nate SILVER (INTP)
Sarah SILVERMAN (ENFP)
David SIMON (INFJ)
Paul SIMON (INFP)
Nina SIMONE (INFP)
O.J. SIMPSON (ESTP)
Lily SINGH (ENFP)
Tarsem SINGH (ENFP)
Troye SIVAN (ISFP)
Jojo SIWA (ESFP)
Jenny SLATE (ENFP)
Leïla SLIMANI (INFJ)
Jorja SMITH (ISFP)
Kiki SMITH (INFP)
Patti SMITH (INFP)
Sam SMITH (ESFP)
Will SMITH (ESFP)
Zadie SMITH (INFJ)
Edward SNOWDEN (INTJ)
Timothy SNYDER (INTJ)
Zack SNYDER (ESFP)
Salvador SOBRAL (INFP)
Steven SODERBERGH (ENTJ)
Soko / Stéphanie SOKOLINSKI (ENFP)
Solange / Solange KNOWLES (ISFP)
Rebecca SOLNIT (INFP)
Julien SOLOMITA (ESTP)
Stephen SONDHEIM (INTJ)
Susan SONTAG (INTJ)
Aaron SORKIN (INTP)
Sonia SOTOMAYOR (ENTJ)
Gareth SOUTHGATE (ISTJ)
Kevin SPACEY (ENTJ)
James SPADER (INTP)
Britney SPEARS (ISFJ)
Regina SPEKTOR (INFP)
Tori SPELLING (ISFJ)
Diana SPENCER (ISFP)
Steven SPIELBERG (INFP)
Baruch SPINOZA (INTP)
Bruce SPRINGSTEEN (ISFP)
Cole SPROUSE (ENTP)
St. Vincent / Annie CLARK (INFJ)
Lakeith STANFIELD (ISTP)
Joey STARR (ESTP)
Gwen STEFANI (ESFP)
Gloria STEINEM (ENTJ)
Amandla STENBERG (INFP)
Dan STEVENS (ENFJ)
Michael STEVENS (ENTP)
Sufjan STEVENS (INFJ)
Jon STEWART (ENTP)
Kristen STEWART (ISTP)
Martha STEWART (ENFJ)
Michael STIPE (INFP)
Emma STONE (ENFP)
Stormzy / Michael OMARI (ESFP)
Meryl STREEP (ENFJ)
Donna STRICKLAND (ENTJ)
Jeremy STRONG (INFP)
Bjarne STROUSTRUP (INTP)
Michael STUHLBARG (INFP)
Nicola STURGEON (ENTJ)
Tom STURRIDGE (INFP)
Harry STYLES (ESFP)
Zoe SUGG (ESFJ)
Taylor SWIFT (ESFJ)
Tilda SWINTON (INTP)
Kara SWISHER (ENTJ)
Omar SY (ESFP)
Oli SYKES (ISFP)
Wanda SYKES (ESFP)
Amber TAMBLYN (ENFP)
Tamino / Tamino FOUAD (ISFP)
Terence TAO (INTP)
Quentin TARANTINO (ENTP)
Donna TARTT (INFJ)
Elizabeth TAYLOR (ESFP)
Aaron TAYLOR-JOHNSON (ISFP)
Sam TAYLOR-JOHNSON (ISFP)
Tekashi69 / 6ix9ine / Daniel HERNANDEZ (ESTP)
Miles TELLER (ESTP)
David TENNANT (ENFP)
Nikola TESLA (INTP)
Virgil TEXAS (INTP)
Michelle THALLER (ENTP)
Margaret THATCHER (ESTJ)
The Weeknd / Abel TESFAYE (ISFP)
Charlize THERON (ENTJ)
Louis THEROUX (ENTP)
Peter THIEL (INTP)
Clarence THOMAS (ESTJ)
Kristin Scott THOMAS (ENTJ)
Emma THOMPSON (ENTP)
Maura TIERNEY (ISTP)
Meg TILLY (INFP)
Krista TIPPETT (INFJ)
Lily TOMLIN (ENTP)
Louis TOMLINSON (ENFP)
Giulio TONONI (INTJ)
Meghan TRAINOR (ESFP)
Joachim TRIER (ENFJ)
Donald TRUMP (ESTP)
Ivanka TRUMP (ISFJ)
Alan TUDYK (ENTP)
Cenzo TUIHANI (ISFP)
Alex TURNER (INTP)
Sophie TURNER (ESFP)
Tina TURNER (ESFP)
Jeff TWEEDY (INFP)
Liv TYLER (ISFP)
Name starts with: A B, C D, E F,  G H, I J K L, M N O P, Q R S T, U V W X Y Z.
12 notes · View notes
tabloidtoc · 5 years
Text
In Touch, April 29
Cover: Kim Kardashian and Kanye West -- Baby no. 4 and divorcing 
Tumblr media
Page 1: Contents 
Tumblr media
Page 2: Who Wore It Better? Iskra Lawrence vs. Issa Rae, Lili Reinhart vs. Lily Collins 
Page 3: Please don’t wear feathers, Vanessa Hudgens vs. Emma Roberts 
Page 4: Casting Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman: The Movie -- Judith Light as Felicity, Nick Nolte as William H. Macy, Kylie Jenner as Olivia Jade, John Stamos as Mossimo Giannulli, Candace Cameron Bure as Lori 
Page 5: Drake’s nonstop spending spree, Makeover of the Week -- Demi Lovato in a new bob, Demi Moore’s collection of more than 3000 dolls is worth more than $2 million, Gratitude of the Week -- Kit Harington on nabbing a couple of beers from the executive producers fridge on Game of Thrones, Gripe of the Week -- Stephanie Pratt on her brother Spencer and his wife Heidi Montag 
Page 6: Crib of the Week -- Jessica Alba’s cozy sanctuary in Beverly Hills, Chris Hemsworth sneaks his daughter on to the Tower of Terror ride at Disney
Page 8: Celebrity Shoplifters -- Jax Taylor, Megan Fox, Khloe Kardashian, Kim Richards, Winona Ryder, Lindsay Lohan 
Page 9: Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino’s prison posse, Cardi B and Offset buy half a street near Atlanta, Man Candy of the Week -- Lenny Kravitz, Winner of the Week -- Queer Eye fans raise more than $98,000 to help one of the show’s subjects go back to college, Loser of the Week -- Tarek El Moussa blabs that ex-wife Christina Anstead is having a baby boy
Page 10: Up Close -- Jimmy Fallon and Drew Barrymore 
Page 11: Kaley Cuoco, Blake Shelton and Gwen Stefani, Katy Perry 
Page 12: Busy Philipps and Mandy Moore, Tina Fey, Jude Law in a white Speedo 
Page 13: Jennifer Aniston 
Page 14: David Harbour and Milla Jovovich, Dwayne Wade and Gabrielle Union and Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel, David Hasselhoff 
Page 16: The Avengers on Jimmy Kimmel -- Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth and Paul Rudd 
Page 17: Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan reunite, Ryan Seacrest and Kelly Ripa and Hugh Jackman, Please don’t wear fur 
Page 18: Coachella -- Katy Perry and Zedd, Ariana Grande and 4 of the members of ‘NSync -- Joey Fatone and Lance Bass and JC Chasez and Chris Kirkpatrick, Please try a vegan diet 
Page 19: Kristen Stewart and Sara Dinkin, Selena Gomez and Cardi B, Kendall Jenner
Page 20: John Legend and Chrissy Teigen and kids 
Page 21: Kourtney Kardashian, Whitney Port, Prince Harry 
Page 22: Drinking Games -- Paul “DJ Pauly D” Delvecchio and Vinny Guadagnino, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau and Tim Kash 
Page 23: Mila Kunis, Coco Rocha, Hoda Kotb and Jenna Bush Hager 
Page 24: Cover Story -- Just as baby no. 4 is arriving Kim Kardashian walks out on Kanye West 
Page 28: Fights, money demands and lies cause the Real Housewives to implode 
Page 30: Wendy Williams showdown with the mistress 
Page 32: Gypsy Rose Blanchard was abused by her mother for nearly 24 year then killed her; now she’s getting her happily ever after behind bars 
Page 34: Do They Look Like Who They’re Playing? Taron Egerton as Elton John, Russell Crowe as Roger Ailes, Nicole Kidman as Gretchen Carlson, Charlize Theron as Megyn Kelly 
Page 35: Matt Smith as Robert Mapplethorpe, Zac Efron as Ted Bundy, Margot Robbie as Sharon Tate, Michelle Williams as Gwen Verdon, Cynthia Erivo as Harriet Tubman 
Page 36: Tom Cruise is acting irritable and impatient on the set of Top Gun: Maverick 
Page 37: Networks are clamoring to make a movie about The View, Felicity Huffman’s former assistant tells all, Star Sightings -- Elaine Welteroth, Teresa Giudice, Sophia Bush, Cardi B and G-Eazy, Ryan Cabrera, Blind Item 
Page 38: Why Ben Affleck and Lindsay Shookus split again 
Page 39: Hailey Baldwin thinks Justin Bieber looks too scruffy and shaggy, Katherine Scwarzenegger vetoed signing a prenup with Chris Pratt, Miranda Lambert’s new husband Brendan McLoughlin banned any extra men from being on tour with her and women only as opening acts 
Page 42: Florida socialite Jackie Siegel says her daughter may be gone but she lives on in her heart and will never be forgotten 
Page 44: Plastic surgery shockers -- Nicole Kidman, Khloe Kardashian, Jennifer Lopez 
Page 45: Jennie Garth, Kate Middleton 
Page 46: Style -- Pretty in Pastel -- Alexa Chung, Dakota Fanning, Gigi Hadid, Rita Ora 
Page 47: Miranda Kerr, Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, Karlie Kloss 
Page 48: Sustainable Style 
Page 49: Kate Hudson 
Page 50: Beauty -- Eco-friendly favorites -- Olivia Wilde 
Page 52: Did I Really Do That? Elle Fanning, Carrie Underwood, Gigi Hadid 
Page 54: Sneak Preview -- Chambers 
Page 56: Animal Overload 
Page 57: My dog looks like Milo Ventimiglia 
Page 58: My Night at Home -- Kate del Castillo, Guess Whose Former Roommate -- Lindsay Lohan, Jonah Hill, Lauren Graham, Penn Badgley, Justin Timberlake, Brad Pitt, Ryan Gosling, Jason Priestley, Milo Ventimiglia, Connie Britton, Justin Long, Raven-Symone 
Page 60: Double Take -- Charlize Theron at Disneyland’s Pixar Pier 
Page 62: Horoscope -- Taurus John Cena 
Page 64: Last laughs
1 note · View note
There was so much wrong with this I was compelled to debunk it line by line.
“The biggest successes in the business, character-wise, tend to have more than one axis that they revolve around; take away one, and everything goes wildly off course. ”
This isn’t universally true. Spider-Man for example is defined by power and responsibility. Responsibility can be somewhat broad though and relate to work, family,self-respect, community as well as being a hero so if that’s what you meant then okay. Similarly power can mean more than just super powers. After all Spider-Man’s original sin with the burglar was something he didn’t need super powers to have prevented.
 “Yes, Batman’s very much about Justice, that’s what he teaches us about…but as a character, he’s defined by the idea of Family  from the start, with the deaths of his parents to the various Robins, Alfred and Gordon, and even up to his old, familiar relationship with Gotham itself.”
 This is somewhat debatable given that Batman’s family ties were not present in his first appearance and Alfred was not truly a father figure to him until post-crisis, nearly 5 years after his creation; arguably the same is true of Gordon. But because of his origin and Robin’s and his relationship with Robin okay it does make a lot of sense to say he’s about justice but justice in specific relation to family ties.
 “Superman wants to show us how to hope and work for a better world, but the kink that gives his relationship with humanity weight and definition is his alienation from those he loves so much.  Even if it’s subtle in its presence, stories from All-Star to Birthright have taken that principle to heart in their portrayals of Clark Kent: take that away, and you end up with something like the largely unconflicted, uber-patriotic Man-God of John Byrne’s Man Of Steel (which I know to be many people’s benchmark for the character, but that’s a discussion for another time). ”
This however was your first big misinterpretation.
 That particular interpretation of Superman was absolutely absent from his character until like the Silver Age when, to cash in on the science fiction craze of the time, they leaned harder on his alien origins.
 Post-crisis they went back to him not feeling all that alienated if at all, and outright rejecting said alien heritage, codifying that he is a human first and foremost.
 Some say that these are two equally valid interpretations but the truth is they really aren’t. The entire premise of Superman as originally envisioned by his creators was an immigration allegory combined with a power fantasy. But it wasn’t just any given immigration allegory, it wasn’t as broad as to be anything. It was specifically the allegory of the idealized ultimate American immigrant, the American dream played out in a superhero/science fiction outlet. He wasn’t merely an immigrant, but very much an integrated immigrant who adopted the ideals of his new home and brought with him helpful traits from his place of origin with which to enrichen and help out his new home.
 The idea that he felt alienated and not a part of humanity and that was a great tension between himself and those he loved like his parents or Lois...that was honestly an invention after the fact and a huge betrayal of the fundamental defining point of the character. Practically the opposite.
 It is in truth a MISinterpretation.
 Does that mean Birthright and All-Star Superman and Byrne’s Man of Steel are mutually exclusive?
 I don’t know.
  But it isn’t merely a case of Byrne being the benchmark for many people. Fact is...he got it objectively correct because he was doing what Siegel and Shuster were doing. If Birthright/All-Star are mutually exclusive then I guess yeah, sorry Waid and Morrisson did in fact get it wrong.
 Which shouldn’t be surprising. Waid and Morrisson wanted to effectively reboot Superman BACk to his pre-crisis self circa the 2000s and Morrisson and Waid used said ideas for those stories, with Morisson kinda of rebooting Superman in the Nu52. Cut to 2016 and nu52 Superman was unrebooted back to his post-crisis self (more or less) after the Nu52 (inspired very much by pre-crisis Superman and leaning even harder on the ‘I’m so alienated, let me date this Amazonian demi-godess from an isolated mythic nation’ than pre-crisis itself ever did) utterly failed.
  “Many, if you asked them what Parker’s second irreducible element is, would say that the big idea in play is the experience of being a teenager.”
No it isn’t.
 “And it’s hardly unfounded.”
 Yes it is.
 “Voices throughout the online comics community, from Chris Sims[1][2] to Sequart’s own Colin Smith[3] (R.I.P., TooBusyThinkingAboutMyComics) to David Brothers[4], among many others, put forward that idea to greater or lesser degrees.”
 And those voices are grossly mistaken.
  “And they’re not wrong, not really.”
 Again, yes they are.
 Let’s contextualize things properly.
 Circa the early 1960s the true concept of ‘the teen’ was at best incredibly new and at worst didn’t truly exist. Indeed as originally envisioned by Lee and Ditko Peter was a SENIOR not a 15 year old. He was going on trips out of town on his own within the first 10 issues. Aunt May was talking about him getting married within the first 20 and he considered proposing to Betty before he even hit college.
 In those high school years Peter actually DIDN’T spend most of his civilian time in a high school setting. It happened but he was mostly centred upont he Bugle, a place of work.
 He was working to support himself, Aunt May and generally financially support the household as the man of the house in lieu of Uncle Ben.
 THAT...is the exact opposite of being defined by youth. Even in the early 1960s a teenager wouldn’t have been defined so heavily by their employment, let alone an employment as the breadwinner for the family, the one upon who’s shoulders everything rested.
 That is very much an ADULT responsibility. Which makes sense. Realistically lsing your father and having to adopt that responsibility would cause you to grow up faster in many respects. Couple this with the fact that neither Lee or Ditko were even of the same generation as 1960s teens and from a time period where the teenager truly didn’t exist and you as a youngster had to step up earlier and basically go from child to young adult with little in between and it makes a lot of sense, whereas ‘he’s about youth and being a teenager’ absolutely doesn’t.
 That’s nothing more than a modern idea we project backwards onto those older stories.
 The experience of being a teen had little to do with defining Spider-Man’s character, it just happened to be something relatively different for the time period and indeed Stan Lee stated he called him Spider-MAN in the first place because he intended from the outset for Peter to age into adulthood eventually, and keep going at which point calling himself Spider-BOY made little sense. This is corroborated by the fact that Lee in the stories and in other interviews has repeatedly stated he always intended Peter to eventually marry (a decided adult experience) Gwen Stacy. He equally stated he was pleased in the comics and newspaper strips to see Peter’s character development from teen to married guy and looked forward to him eventually having children.
 If part of the core idea of Spider-Man was his youthfulness then these ideas should’ve been anethma to his co-creator. A character defined by youth and the experiences of being a teen can never age out of that period of his life or be intended to age out of that period without destroying the fundamental core of the character, or at least a huge part of the fundamental core.
 But that didn’t happen. Spider-Man left high school within the first 3-4 years of his existence and it is in fact the ROMITA era in college which until the early 2000s (when USM began being pushed as the definitve Spider-Man ever) was seen as the true blue golden age of Spider-Man.
 There is after all a reason why versions of Spider-man set in high school USE so much stuff from the college era. Few TV shows, movies, video games or alternate universe comics set in Spider-Man’s high school years DON’T feature college era characters like Harry Osborn, Gwen Stacy, Mary Jane, Joe Robertson, Norman Osborn, Black Cat or plot lines relevant from the college years, such as Harry’s drug addiction, Norman being unmasked as the Goblin, the debut of the Rhino, the Shcoker, the Kingpin, Silvermane/other gangsters. Few in fact ever depict Spidey in a relationship with Betty Brant or in a love triangle with her and Liz Allan. Liz herself hasn’t gotten as much play as the above listed college era characters and whenever she does it’s usually in a second fiddle position to said college era characters.
 Indeed in the majority of adaptations prior to 2008 (a mere 10 years ago) placed Spider-Man in college instead of high school or else transitioned him into college very quickly. Sam Raimi’s first movie, which is the single most reverential one to the Ditko run, has Peter transition into college by the halfway point of the film.* In the 1994 Spider-Man cartoon (which had a huge influence upon the Raimi trilogy and Venom over all) Spider-Man was only n high school for one flashback sequence and in college the rest of the time and that show had very direct involvement and consultation from Stan Lee. In the upcoming and highly anticipated Insomniac video game, Spider-Man’s story begins POST-College. In the 1970s Spider-Man newspaper strips by Stan Lee himself, the story begins in college and Spider-Man’s origin is even retold to take place in college. Again that’s by the CREATOR of Spider-Man.
  It’s very obvious that the teenage/high school experience is NOT key or relevant to the character at all.
 Indeed the Ditko issues depicting him in high school don’t place much focus upon his schoolwork, zits, or high school dating and the like. The most it is relevant is being bullied by Flash but that wasn’t in every issue or got half as much panel time as Jameson and the Bugle stuff. Which again, was affiliated with Peter’s work, work being an ADULT aspect of life, not a particularly youthful/high school experience.
 You are correct in your assessment that power/responsibility isn’t the sole axis for Spider-Man’s character.
 But wholly incorrect that ‘youth’ is the other axis. In truth it’s...being a normal guy.
 THAT was the actual point Lee and Ditko had in mind. The Hero who could be YOU! Spider-Man was the everyman hero, the hero with relatable problems. His other axis was that he was ORDINARY relatively speaking, not that he was young.
 This is corroborated by long term (as in began in the 1970s) fan and Spider-Man analyst J.R. Fettinger:
 Peter's appeal was not that he was a loser (although his hard times was a big factor in his popularity), but that he was ordinary. 
I remembered something that one of Hero Realm's co-creators, the "late" George Berryman, told me in the early days of the Realm was that Marvel President Bill Jemas "hates MJ, hates the baby, and wants Spidey to be a kid again."
Hmmm.
For some reason I became hung up on the phrase of wanting Spidey to be a kid again. And finally, I figured out why it was bothering me - and that's because it presumes that Spidey was a kid in the first place. And he wasn't. Not really. At least not the kind of kid the Marvel execs who have been desperate to de-age him think he was.
You doubt?
First of all, we do have to acknowledge that while many of us related to Peter Parker in one way or another (which is the root of his popularity), how many of us are really like him? The second part of that question is how many kids did you know in high school who were like Peter Parker? Let's establish that Peter was 15 at the time of the spider bite (supported by the recent Civil War where Peter tells the media he has been Spider-Man since he was 15 years old). He probably turns 16 before too long and is 17 by Amazing Spider-Man #16 when Matt Murdock, whose radar senses are pretty accurate, estimates his age. Let's look at what kind of "kid" Peter Parker really was in the Lee-Ditko, Lee-Romita, Sr. days:
After     the death of Uncle Ben, Peter becomes the head of the household because     Aunt May becomes too frail and senile to do much of anything (the way she     was written at that time). Although Aunt May cooks him wheatcakes and     worries about him being sick, Peter is the one with the primary source of     income, and he is also her primary caregiver, a very atypical situation     for a 15 or 16 year old.
Speaking     of Peter's employment, I probably really don't need to talk about the     inherent absurdity of a high schooler becoming one of the premier     photographers of that great metropolitan newspaper, the Daily Bugle.
Peter's     (and Spidey's) quick, razor-sharp witticisms tend to be the product of a     more mature, experienced, well-read individual given the topical     references, like maybe a middle-aged writer. Just a guess. There are too     many to mention, but one of my favorite of Peter's overwritten zingers     occurs in Amazing Spider-Man #26, when having had enough of     Flash Thompson's big mouth, he states "I'm in no mood for your     musclebound mirth today! And the same goes for your gang of grinning     hyenas." Hey, I love this stuff, but if Peter were doing this on TV     in one of those typical teen-age oriented shows where the kids have all     the brains and wisdom and the parents are largely ineffectual buffoons,     his character would be pilloried by the critics for being too highbrow,     clever, or simply obnoxious for a teenager. I did know someone in college     who was the quickest with a great comeback as anyone I have ever met     before or since, but he was an English and literature major, not a science     major (he's now an English professor and writer, so there seems to be a     logical connect).
Speaking     of the science major thing, I am probably in the minority opinion on this,     but the extent of Peter's genius leaves me a bit cold. I do like the idea     that he is this brainy guy whom everyone thinks is a nerd, but is really     this terrific superhero. But seriously, an expert in complex polymers by     age 15 (as Roger Stern once illustrated - in order to demonstrate that     Peter was already on the road to the web fluid thing)? And then there's     that anti-magnetic inverter he uses in Amazing #2 to take out the Vulture.     And don't forget how he whipped up an antidote to temporarily cure the     Lizard all in the space of a couple of panels in Amazing #6. I have a     feeling that any kid this smart would not be in the New York City public     school system, or any public school system.
So, ultimately, Peter Parker was never a real kid, not in the sense that real kids are, but he was really an adult in a teenager's body. He had the weight of the world on his shoulders like an adult, and he had true adult responsibilities. In a way, Peter Parker was very much like Charlie Brown of Peanuts fame. Charles Schulz's famous character was never really just a plain kid - he was a neurotic adult in the body of an eight year old (or however old he was). And talk about topical references, Peanuts was loaded with them. However, Schultz's clever writing, wit, and keen understanding of human foibles made this accessible to both young and old. It wouldn't have mattered whether Charlie was five or 15, Schultz's marvelous writing would have carried the message in an entertaining style.
Now, I am not implying that no teenager has ever become head of the household, or held a permanent job before graduation, or had a lightning fast wit, or been a super-genius and still at a public school (but was there ever anyone who was all of those). Nor am I trying to take anyway any of the fun of the early days of Spider-Man, nor ruin any of the fantasy conceits, because that's what it is - fantasy. We recognize that and enjoy it anyway. The point I am making is that for anyone, whether they be a Marvel suit, editor, writer, or someone from Wizard to get hung up on Peter's youth being the core of his popularity, and something that must be repeatedly revisited in order to make the titles popular again, is either blind, in denial, or simply not doing their homework on the character.
    And if you want to handwave his views because he is a fan and observer (like Sims et al listed above) then consider this...Tom DeFalco agrees with him. Tom DeFalco has stated more than once that Spider-Man is about responsibility and NOT youth.
 To get why that is a big deal, Tom DeFalco is also a long time fan. As in began reading in 1962 with Amazing Fantasy #15. He edited Spider-Man for years. He wrote THREE runs on Spider-Man and a 10+ year long run on a pseudo sequel called Spider-Girl. He was EIC of Marvel for a time and wrote a book literally called ‘Spider-Man: the Ultimate Guide’.
 He is infinitely more qualified to discuss Spider-Man than any of the other people listed in this article or in my response sans Stan Lee himself.**
 And he corroborates my and Fettinger’s point, that Spider-Man is definitely NOT about youth/the teenage high school experience.
  “Moreover The high school years, and everything that comes with them, are indisputably at the center of the earliest adventures.”
 Yes and no.
 Spider-Man was in high school for the first 28 issues so yes.
 But high school EXPERIENCES were 100% indisputably NOT the centre of the stories for that time period and again, Spider-Man became MORE popular and his true golden age was defined AFTER high school.
  “ It’s a well people have been going back to for years from the late, lamented Spectacular Spider-Man cartoon; to David Lapham and Tony Harris’s With Great Power; Marvel Adventures Spider-Man; Sean McKeever, Takeshi Miyazawa and David Hahn’s Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane; twice over with Ultimate Spider-Man by Brian Bendis and assorted artists (in my opinion, the most effective comic at recapturing the spirit of the Lee / Ditko years during the first run with Bagley…though again, that’s a topic for another time); and soon enough once more with Dan Slott and Ramon Perez’s “Learning To Crawl”. ”
  And again, notice how all of those within Spider-Man’s 55+ year history only relate to stuff from the last 18. Spider-Man hit 56 years old recently. 18/56 is merely less than 33 percent of all of Spider-Man’s history wherein the high school era is being revisted over and over and over again.
 It has even less weight when you consider the trend merely started because
 a)    USM was popular and USM’s success owed much more to Bagley’s art and the accessibility afforded it by being a singular self-contained narrative with a clear starting point. Read issue one or volume 1 of the trades and then keep going, no need to crossover into Ultimate Spectacular or Ultimate Web of Spider-Man
b)    USM got started up by the disastrous EIC Bill Jemas who ignorantly believed Spider-Man to be defined by youth
c)    The Spec cartoon was set in high school first and foremost to simply differentiate itself from almost every adaptation prior to it which DIDN’T centre things in high school and a desire to try something that had never been done before. The long term plan was for the show to run 5 seasons of high school before transitioning into DVD movies set in college
d)    Spider-Man Loves Mary Jane was aimed as a tweenage all ages audience thus centring things on high school experiences made more sense as that was more directly relating to the age of the audience
e)    Around the same time period Superman’s origins were revisted multiple times because people just LIKE going back to the early years inherently.
 This doesn’t spell out ‘high school is more inherently Spider-Man and better for the character’. It spells out ‘this is something different we’re milking for all it’s worth whilst getting stuck in a rut creatively.
 Hell THAT IS WHY Insomniac are NOT doing high school OR college for their game.
  Additionally USM DID NOT recapture the spirit of the original Ditko stories. People believe they did because they liked it or else because that narrative has been repeated. But a simple analysis of the Ditko High school years to USM reveals countless differences between he two, differences which very seriously alter the spirit of the original stories. Ditko Peter had no real friends and his first romance wasn’t serious at all. He was constantly anxious over May’s health and being a provider for the family. Jameson was a constant source of harassment in and out of costume and a major force impacting his life, with his whole job as a photographer meant to get one over on his harasser. Ditko Peter was over all lonely and on edge a lot emotionally.
 NONE of that applies to Ultimate Spider-Man under Bendis. Peter is more chilled out and whilst not a member of the in-crowd, clearly isn’t lonely having a friendship group. His first romance with MJ isn’t not serious, it’s a very deep committed love that involves her acting as a confidant which was absolutely NOT the case in the original Ditko stories. Jameson is barely there and his smear campaign against Spider-Man is not the most important aspect of their relationship or has a huge impact upon Peter’s life. Gwen Stacy lives with him. Nick Fury has an important presence upon his life and Aunt May is the bread winner, provider and is never a source of worry due to being pretty healthy for her age.
 It is truly NOT a spiritual successor to the Ditko run at all.
 “Those earliest of stories are at the center of everything good about the character…”
 Again, no they aren’t. Mary Jane, Gwen Stacy, Harry Osborn, the Green Goblin and everything awesome about the College era (which I will remind you was MORE popular than the High school era) proves that assessment incorrect.
  “The Parker Luck, in those earliest days? Largely amounted to costumes shrinking in the wash, or misunderstandings with his girlfriend(s… You unmitigated cad), or his aunt just not getting it, man”
 Aunt May not getting it was a college era thing, not prevalent in the high school era.
 “but from any objective standpoint the boy was leading a charmed life. So why the misery? Because he’s a teenager. ”
  No. The misery was because he didn’t lead a charmed life. This is patently obvious from the stories.
 He had no friends.
 His girlfriend Betty Brant was often unreasonable and became insanely jealous whenever Liz like...talked to him!
 His mother figure was often in poor health creating huge financial burdens.
 Jameson verbally abused him and shortchanged him at work.
 The public hated and feared him and believed him to be a criminal.
 He risked his life routinely.
 He was ostracized and bullied at school.
  Oh yeah...and his father figure was dead and he blamed himself for it.
 To dismiss all that and chalk up his misery via ‘he’s a teenager of course he’d be moody’ is a gross misinterpretation of the character and a highly unsympathetic attempt to analyze him.
 I’m not saying his woes weren’t over exaggerated due to his age, but serious and justifiable cause for sadness Peter absolutely had.
  “Because it’s always the end of the world at 16, when in truth the world isn’t set against him (something we’ll be getting back to), but his problems simply result from misunderstandings, from the basic realities of his situation, and from screw-ups entirely on his own part. ”
 Again this is objectively wrong. SOMETIMES yes there are screw ups of his own makings, but Flash’s bullying, Jameson’s smear campaign and May’s illnesses were the biggest sources of woe in his life and none of those were his fault. Those were instances where thw world really was unjustifiably against him. Jameson had no right cause to smear Spider-Man. Flash wasn’t in the right to bully Peter. And May and Peter didn’t deserve to go through May’s frail health.
  “His was a situation entirely relatable, a lonely boy hiding behind a false face and acting as the man he wants to be, getting the strength over time to become that man himself. ”
 No he WAS a man who’d had to grow up in a lot of ways fast just to cope with the burdens of life. See what Fettinger wrote above as well as Amazing Fantasy #16 and ASM #400’s backup story by DeMatteis, both of which have Peter in the past and in hindsight referring to himself as a growing up with the death of uncle Ben.
 You are channelling Sims misinterpretation here.
 Both his and your argument hinges upon Spider-Man being a facade Peter adopts when he becomes Spider-Man like he’s Superman or Batman in reverse.
 But that isn’t the case. Spider-Man isn’t an ACT Peter performs, it’s just him, freed from certain constraints.
 In or out of the costume he is who he is.
 “A kid who refuses to tell the people closest to him about himself, in theory for their own good, but deep down because he’s terrified of being rejected the same way so many do when you’re growing up and defining your identity. ”
 Or because you know nobody in the high school years were shown as trustworthy besides Aunt May who a doctor more or less told him ‘If you surprise her enough she WILL die!’
 The more people who know something the bigger the chance that it’ll slip out. If May found out then as far as Peter knew that WOULD kill her, end of story.
 So who was he SUPPOSED to trust with his big secret besides her?
 Betty Brant? The woman who worked directly with the millionaire news mogul who HATED him? The woman who’d proven herself to have some criminal ties and who was generally unreasonable far too often?
  Liz Allan who partook in the mocking and bullying of Peter until she abruptly started to like him?
 Flash, his bully and tormentor?
 Jameson his OTHER tormentor?
  There was NOBODY for Peter to safely tell his secret to without risking it coming out to Aunt May.
  And his fear of rejection wasn’t stemming from teenage angst (because AGAIN, the concept of the teenager as we know it today didn’t truly exist in the 1960s) but from Jameson painting him as a criminal.
 In fact Peter DID come clean in ASM #87 during the college era to people who HAD been close to him and whom he sincerely loved and cared for and had infinitely more reason to trust than anyone in the high school era.
 Know what happened?
 They DID reject him!
 “As the challenges increase, so too does he rise to meet them, maturing into the sort of person capable of realizing the responsibilities he’s taken on, and the storytelling engine I mentioned earlier purrs, as do sales figures.”
 Or you know he meets those responsibilities from the outset and as word of mouth and confidence in the series grows so too do sales  until Romita took over, aged Peter into adulthood and told fun less angsty (so...less teenaged) stories which resulted in stratospheric sales.
 “Lifting some big-ass machinery aside, that’s the comic where his puppy-dog relationship with Betty Brant comes to a conclusive end, not out of manufactured concern that revealing his secret will somehow lead to her demise (that worry wouldn’t come to the forefront of his concerns until…oh, let’s say about 88 issues later), but from the simple and adult acknowledgement that it would never work between the two no matter how they feel. ”
 No. Peter and Betty ENDED their relationship in ASM #30 not #33. ASM #33 just underscored the ending. It ended in ASM #30 because Peter realized Betty didn’t and couldn’t want to marry a man who risked his life as he did.
 He’d already ended it, ASM #33 just confirmed his decision as correct.
  “That’swhere he finally meets JJJ on his own terms and gets one up on the skinflint. That’s where he finally, at least in theory, manages to overcome the shame of his first and greatest failure by saving Aunt May. It had been getting built up to for a while, with Peter graduating high school and getting into college, but things were still on hold with his preoccupation with his aunt’s medical problems distracting from his rapidly-growing new cast. ”
 I don’t necessarily disagree that Peter completely corsses the threshold into adulthood with the Master Planner trilogy but this actually undermines your earlier argument that the character was built around and doesn’t work without being defined by youth.
 I’ve already laid out how that was never the case but for the sake of argument let’s say you are right and he had been about youth up until ASM #33 when he grows up.
 How comes the character dealt with mostly similar social and personal issues (exempting lonliness and bullying) after that point in addition to new more adult ones and sales and acclaim went UP?
 “In the last Ditko issues, you see Peter going out of his way to connect with his new classmates, an idea that would have been anathema to him not many issues earlier, and turning down the advances of a potential Betty Brant in the making in ASM #36 because he’s managed to figure out where that will go”
 Again no, your assessment is that Peter turned down that girl because he figured out it’d be a retread of Betty brant. In truth that was a mistaken presumption he made naively. He believed she valued his brains and therefore it’d turn out like Betty. He was wrong.
 “Suddenly the stakes are higher. Aunt May’s condition worsens. The fabled money problems start to come to the forefront, though at the moment they’re mostly limited to not being able to pay for dates or his snazzy new motorcycle, rather than the life-or-death issue it would become later. ”
 Again this is a poorly researched assessment. Aunt May had been having health problems throughout the Ditko run, with 3 near fatal health problems alone. Peter had money problems related to those and other things literally from ASM #1.
 Your assessment is that these things didn’t exist or didn’t exist as prominently until the Romita era but this is probably incorrect. They were there in big ways and merely continued into the Romita era.
 You could argue they were more prominent because there were more instances of those things, but the Romita (more accurately the post-Ditko Stan Lee run) lasted LONGER than the Ditko era over all so of course that was the case.
 “And even as the situation worsens, he doesn’t crumble under the pressure, because he’s changed enough as a hero and a man to rise to those challenges, even if he’ll never rise above them.”
 But he didn’t crumble before such challenges before during the High school years and in certain cases DID rise above such challenges.
  “But with exceptions like Mary Jane’s arrival, “Spider-Man No More” and the rightly famous Harry Osborn drug issues, Stan’s remaining time on Spider-Man would never reach the heights of his collaboration with Ditko. ”
 Yeah, remember how sales went down after Ditko left...except they didn’t.
 Remember how all those Ditko stories like Kraven crashing Flash’s leaving party, or the Petrified Tablet Saga, or the Brand of the Brainwasher, or Doc Ock boarding with Aunt May, or Captain Stacy’s death or the first Rhino stories, the first Colonel Jupiter story, the debut of Shocker, Kingpin or Norman Osborn remember he was the Goblin the first time, were so much better than everything after Ditko left and got acclaimed or revisted in adaptations, retellings and flashbacks over the course of decades?
 Oh wait a minute all of those were post-Ditko stories.
  “It started to congeal into familiarity, the never-ending soap opera that others would come to imitate—after all, it’s far easier to replicate the success of something when it can be reduced down to a formula, rather than a constant series of innovations—and would eventually be accepted itself as an essential element of the character.”
 Yes but this applies to the majority of comic book runs wherein a writer lingers for too long. Lee’s F4 work dipped in quality over time.
 Post-Gwen’s death the quality markedly improved.
  “And as a result of this, and the desire to reduce Spider-Man to an easily-repeatable equation being applied to the earlier stories causing the strip-mining of only the surface elements, the core character philosophies of the Spider-Man franchise would be twisted into Loss and the Soap Opera dynamics mentioned earlier.”
  No they weren’t. They were twisted into ‘he’s a loser’ and even that wasn’t a perennial thing. It applies to the Woflman run, the Mackie/Byrne reboot, Brand New Day and Slott’s run.
  “One good example of the problem is the relatively recent “Mysterioso” arc of Amazing Spider-Man #618-620, by Dan Slott and Marcos Martin. Good writing, ”
 There is no such thing as a Dan Slott Spider-Man story with good writing because Dan Slott is an objectively aweful Spider-Man writer.
  In this story alone you have him nonsensically ignore Mysterio’s death in Daredevil saying he faked it. How the Hell does Mysterio fake out DD’s hyper senses?
  “What, you don’t remember Carlie Cooper’s father, introduced in that arc as having been a cop who died years earlier but actually being alive and really being in the crooked pocket of Mysterio but is taken down by his daughter getting her to make an emotional breakthrough, none of this having anything to do with Spider-Man himself and actually completely distracting from the engaging main plot and it worked about as well as this overlong sentence?”
 See you just spelled out a huge reason why this arc cannot logically be said to have good writing.
  “It’s gone from Peter having trouble explaining himself to the person who can’t be trusted with even the simplest tasks—and in fact, he has become truly forgetful and neglectful a great deal of the time. He’s gone from a whiz-kid who has to take pictures of himself to pay the bills because of his aunt to the 250 I.Q. mega-genius who can barely scrape by, an empathetic naturally good-humored friend who can’t hold a relationship, a trouble-magnet whose luck once explainable by his own mistakes and misfortunes can at this point only be explained by witchcraft. He’s become the loser he was always afraid he was. What are we supposed to learn from this irresponsible schmuck, exactly?”
  This is the single most poignant and insightful comment in the article. But this only applies to Spider-Man from 2008 onwards. This WASN’T true of the JMS era Spider-Man.
 “So if he isn’t about loss (at least not, I’d argue, in a manner that can really work long-term at such a high level as what’s been going on for so long), but he’s not really about being a teenager either, what is he ‘about’?
 He’s about growing.”
  Jesus Christ no, he isn’t.
 He’s not about growing, about being a teen or about loss.
  He’s about power+responsibility within the context of being a relatively normal person.
  THAT’S WHY HE’S CALLED SO RELATABLE!
  THAT’S why he’s referred to by Stan Lee himself as the hero who could be you.
  “That scene above in ASM #8 (by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, which is as official as if Marvel the corporate entity gained sentience and started writing comics on its own), where Spidey’s hogtying the Human Torch? Johnny’s not secretly the Chameleon in disguise, nor is he being mind-controlled by Dr. Doom or the Ringmaster. Peter’s doing it because he’s angry at the guy getting all the breaks he doesn’t, and feels like publicly ruining his day. This was not, by the way, the slightest bit uncharacteristic of Peter Parker as we’d seen him up to this point.”
  Actually it absolutely was, especially when you consider the story actually happens after ASM #21 when Peter had already matured a bit.
  You need to understand that this story whilst being published IN ASM...in truth is actually more of a Strange Tales Human Torch story.
  There is no personal life stakes for Spider-Man and Spidey is himself the only character from his own comic to appear, everyone else from the Torch to the FF, Dorrie Evans and the other Torch supporting cast are from Strange Tales. And as if to confirm things, this was the ONLY Spider-Man story during the Ditko era published in ASM and it’s annuals NOT worked on by Ditko himself.
   We all know of the Marvel method which rendered the artists of each story vital contributors to the stories at hand. Well if Stan Lee was working with Ditko vs. Kirby on a particular project the end results, including the characterization, were not necessarily going to be the same. In fact they often were not.
   Kirby didn’t create or understand Spider-Man. Ditko did and Ditko DIDN’T characetrize Spidey like this during most of his run, including up until this point.
   Additionally to differentiate themselves from DC, the Marvel pantheon routinely had the heroes bicker and dislike one another whenever they met up. It was rare for that to NOT be the case in the Silver Age.
  And routinely in the Silver Age the guest stars were painted more unfavourably than the resident main character(s). This was the case for most of the F4’s appearences in ASM.
    ASM #8 is a reversal because like I said, it’s not actually a Spider-Man story. It’s a left over Strange Tales story. It’s a Torch story which means Torch is painted positively whilst Spider-Man is painted as a jerk, synergy and consistent characterization be damned.
   “In the earliest material, Peter Parker was a dick, and that went on long after the mugger got turned in. ”
  No he absolutely wasn’t. Moments where he was a dick perhaps but this is a toxically cynical and unsympathetic misinterpretation of the character in line with the bullshit of ‘he lived a charmed life’.
   I’ve seen it before and it never holds up.
  Worse is the notion of he was a dick even after the mugger was turned in. Like...his Dad just died dude FFS.
   “ His immediate response after Ben was killed? Keep on going with the show business until Jameson starts going after him.”
  Yeah in order to earn money to support Aunt May and allow them to keep their home because they were facing eminent eviction.
   He wasn’t resolving to continue with show business INSTEAD of fighting crime, that was evident from ASM #1 and #2 as well as from the untold stories from Amazing Fantasy #16-18.
  “His first couple saves are at least in part about His Good Name, whether saving Jameson’s son with the idea that it would get him on the old man’s good side, or going after the Chameleon for impersonating him, and even once he starts going after criminals on a consistent basis it’s initially only for photography money. ”
   Again you’ve not properly paid attention and your interpretation is rooted in cynicism.
  Yeah IN PART he was going after those things for the sake of his reputation. But that wasn’t the root of it at all.
  He saves John Jameson because he saw someone in need he doesn’t even mention the idea that saving him will help his reputation until after the fact and it’s an afterthought. He simply saw someone who needed help and so he acted as he hadn’t done before with the burglar.
   In the Chameleon story he spots the Chameleon getting away with government secrets (a HUGE deal in the Cold War 1960s) and sees his helicopter getting away so he leaps into action.
   Is he doing it to exonerate himself or would he have done that had he realized a spy was making away with stolen secrets right in front of him anyway?
   Given how in the same comic book he leapt into action to save a life immediately it’s very obviously the latter that doubles up as the former. And even it was to exonerate himself that’s hardly a selfish dick move.
  A criminal committed a crime and framed him for it. It isn’t selfish or a dick move to bring him to justice.
  Equally even if he was fighting crimes to rehabilitate his reputation, again his damaged rep was how he lost a reliable source of income that he needed to survive and support his aunt and household. It isn’t selfish and dickish to attempt to help your reputation under those circumstances.
   As for going after criminals for photography money this is again a misrepresentation of Spider-Man’s motives.
   In ASM #2 it’s implied the Vulture’s presence isn’t huge. Some people don’t even believe he exists. It’s ambiguous as to when exactly Peter himself learned of his existence and even if he did already know he had the more pressing problem of earning money to pay the rent for himself and aunt May, he might not have figured out or gotten a routine going for actively crime fighting yet.
   He seeks out the Vulture for profit initially yes but again earning money isn’t selfish or a dick move. He needed to do it to survive and support Aunt May. He GETS the pictures and therefore his source of income after being beaten by the Vulture but states that he’s already resolved to be a costumed adventurer before upgrading his belt. In other words he had already decided to fight crime and just saw a way to (pardon the pub) kill 2 birds with one stone. To this end he initiates a rematch with Vulture even though he didn’t HAVE to if he was in it just for the money. He already had the pictures he didn’t NEED to end the public menace of the Vulture and he wasn’t naive enough to believe that doing so would change Jonah’s tune.
    But he did it anyway because he WAS trying to be a hero.
    “He takes stupid chances. He’s desperate for cash. He insults and attacks undeserving people. ”
   Apart from being desperate for cash (which would mean his efforts for helping his rep or earning money WOULDN’T make him a dick) he literally never does this at any point in the Ditko run. He maybe insults ONE person who doesn’t deserve it once.
   “He fakes pictures of Sandman and Electro with the flimsiest of moral justifications.”
  No. He faked pictures of the Sandman out of youthful naivete and then did it with Electro to earn money to SAVE AUNT MAY’S LIFE!
   Journalistic ethics can go suck the big one if they need to be sacrificed for the sake of saving a human life for God’s sake.
   He felt bad about the latter showing how he wasn’t a dick and had grown and consequently accepted the reprimands that eventually came from faking such pictures.
   “He’s got a chip on his shoulder the size of Queens and can barely begin to control his temper.”
  Again bullshit. He controls his temper plenty hence he only once lashes out at Flash twice and obviously not fully since he never used his strength to seriously injure him.
  As for having a chip on your shoulder no shit. His Dad’s dead, his mother is sickly and he’s trying to hold it all together whilst some asshole on the news lies about him and he’s bullied at school.
  OF COURSE he has a chip on his shoulder.
   “He’ll lash out at people on suspicion or anger alone,”
   Again he literally never did this.
  “ and in some early stories he just plain gave up or ran away until he learned his lesson or circumstances changed. ”
   Yeah he did but that doesn’t make him a dick. It makes him human. He quit TWICE by the way. Once after Doc Ock owned his ass and broke his confidence (which can happen to anyone of any age) and once when everything went wrong and Aunt May was dying. She got better and gave him a pep talk.
  This again is something that can happen to anyone and isn’t an example of being qa dick.
   Does it maybe show him as being a kid.
  Sure.
   But that wasn’t the POINT. Stan Lee wanted him to be realistic and he happened to be a youngster. So he relatively speaking wrote him believably within that context, but as I said youth was never THE point.
    Nor was growth because EVERY Silver Age marvel character grew and developed, whether they were teens like Rick Jones, Spider-Man and the Torchor adults like Doctor Strange, Reed Richards and Ben Grimm.
    “He’s a bitter, arrogant know-it-all who looks down on virtually everyone around him, and even if we can’t blame him with all he goes through, he’s often far afield of anything resembling “likeable”.”
  Except for all those readers of the time and sine who called him likable and relatable you mean.
   Your just being utterly cynical.
   I mean who does he ACTUALLY look down on really? Flash and the people who bully him who display anti-intellectual tendencies. Jameson who is a blowhard slander hound. Oh and the super villains who waste their talents on hurting people so fuck them.
  Beyond those people he looks down sometimes on fellow heroes but every hero looked down upon basically every other hero in Silver Age Marvel and real talk, Spider-Man had it rougher than most of them anyway so he wasn’t wrong to think he WAS better than them.
  But he didn’t look down on Betty or Aunt May or Uncle Ben or other people. SO he isn’t that arrogant most of the time (a little bit early on when he hasn’t faced down major foes like Doc Ock yet but then that stops by issue #3) and his bitterness is well earned.
   So you are again misinterpreting.
   Moreover those things apply to many differnet Marvel Silver Age characters.
Reed, Ben, and Sue, all adults, had plenty of moments of aggression, immaturity and the like. Not because the point was they are those things but just because that’s how Stan happened to write most of his characters back then. Hank Pym could be an aggressive jerk. Captain America could be an aggressive immature jerk, e.g. when he tried to inspire Hank Pym by attacking him. 
 “But he changes, so completely many seem to forget he was ever anything other than the official co-saint of the Marvel Universe alongside Steve Rogers. Perhaps it’s in part because of this misunderstanding that Spider-Man 2—starring Peter Parker being Very Sad because he won’t trust the people around him with information that directly impacts their safety, and pushing himself so hard he can’t even effectively fight crime anymore, defeating the purpose altogether of him taking the pain of the entirety of New York unto himself like a bargain-basement Christ—is widely considered the high-water mark of the character’s modern history, while the Peter Parker of The Amazing Spider-Man—who actually acts like a teenager, keeps on making mistakes and operating under selfish motives even after the mugging and has to learn, and is willing to place hope in tomorrow and try and still make a happy life for himself alongside the obligations he must shoulder—is quite widely considered a “douchebag”.”
  Dear God this is so wrongheaded it hurts.
  In the Raimi movies Peter thinks that entrusting MJ with his secret will endanger her because she likes Spider-Man so she’d want to be with him more. Which HAPPENS. He was 100% correct, she literally ditches her wedding for him!
   But he WANTED to push her away because in her NOT being too close to him she would be safer. Which is also 100% correct but he evolved by the end of the second movie to be at peace with that risk and accepting that it was her choice.
  It didn’t defeat the purpose it was a lesson he needed to LEARN. But his logic can’t be questioned.
  As for Harry or Aunt May, he feared May would hate and reject him and that’s his goddam MOTHER so obviously he wasn’t going to tell her until he couldn’t stand it any more. And the other guy was his best friend and in his case he already wanted to kill him and then TRIED to do that in the third movie so again peter was right.
  In Spider-Man 2 Peter doesn’t push himself too hard, he merely tries to balance everyday life with being a hero and finds it a struggle as was the case in the comic it was originally based upon. His mind and body suspend his powers because subconsciously he wants to be free of the burden but it wasn’t like if he’d taken things easier it wouldn’t have happened. He wasn’t going too hard, he was going normally but normally is hard when you are a hero. In fact the whole ‘he loses his powers because he doesn’t want them’ thing IS from a Ditko issue so your point is moot.
  As for Garfield Spider-Man unless you grade him on the curve he was kind of a douchebag. Not so much in what he does but how he did it. He was overly cocky for the character, e.g. his dip and kiss of Gwen in the second movie. That movie that along with the first one you know...killed the franchise so hard Marvel Studios had to save them.
   So...why is Spider-Man 2 not a high water mark again?
  No to mention comparing the two by damning Spider-Man 2 is foolish because they are not the same ages or at the same points in their lives.
 “He grows, he shifts, he learns lessons and forgets them and falls and picks himself back up, and he never stops pushing forward. He takes on the responsibility of becoming the Man he claims to be, that others need him to be, even if he doesn’t consciously realize it at first. That’s how he was built, and how he was visibly meant to keep going at first. That’s the “in”, that’s what makes him an everyman we can all relate to, because no one ever stops growing up.”
   Yes and no.
  Yes he was designed to grow and develop, but everyone stops growing up when they hit adulthood, they just don’t stop growing as people.
   No though that wasn’t what made him relatable. The reltability WAS the point, not the growing up. He was relatable because he dealt with down to Earth normal life problems along with relatively realistic problems spiralling out of being a superhero and just having normal life experines anyway.
  Countless movies present everyman characters who are NOT teenagers or people in the midst of reaching adulthood but who are already there. The Ghostbusters for example. These are not characters who grow up but are relatable nevertheless.
   Peter remained relatable in the 80s and 90s and 2000s even though he HAD grown up and HAD hit adulthood a long time before.
   “It’s what differentiates him, makes him real, compared to Superman or Batman or the FF or Captain America. ”
  But THEY all grew and developed too! Less so with Superman and Batman but all the Silver Age Marvel characters grew and developed!
   “And while the steps needed to keep that wheel moving are still implemented, one aching step at a time, it’s still drowned out by a deluge of perfectly satisfactory but no longer cutting-edge superhero adventures (that is, when such steps aren’t rolled back altogether, Mr. Quesada). ”
  I don’t even understand this part.
  “*describes the Joe Casey Bounce comic* So again: is that the only future? Is that the sole way any trace of Spider-Man as originally envisioned and executed can survive?”
  First of all the Bounce sounds like it has a shallow misinformed grasp of Spider-Man.
  Second of all the vision and execution of Spider-Man doesn’t need weird Indie AU knock offs to survive.
   Spider-Man works at any age because he’s about being a normal guy defined by responsibility. He merely HAPPEND to start off as a teen for the sake of some novelty but it was never going to be the forever more status quo or inherently the appeal of the character.
   Consider how many Spider-Man fans were forged in consequent decades via media adaptations of the character where he was more or less at a static age. He might’ve developed and grown but he didn’t begin as a teen or a high schooler in those?
   How many people jumped into the comics in the 80s-2000s where Spider-Man was an adult and not aging much but was still written as a vibrant three dimensional character defined by being relatively down to Earth....and it worked.
    I’m not saying character development isn’t critically vital at all, just that the notion that it’s dependent upon going from youngster to adulthood is not the inherent necessity of the character outside of adaptations which seek to replicate the mythology. 616 Spider-Man is in his early 30s and can keep going forward from there and work just fine because character development can still happen regardless of his age.
Fundamentally your logic here is Spider-Man grew up therefore that is the point of his character. But as I’ve said or implied before this, that applies to every Marvel character.
The X-Men being teens wasn’t truly the point, the point was bigotry and they became MORE popular when they were replaced by adult characters in Giant-Sized X-Men. They even graduated very quickly. But growth wasn’t the point for them either. Nor the F4 who grew and changed nor Daredevil nor the Avengers.
Growth is just part of many examples of good storytelling and part of what definied the Marvel Universe as a whole .
It’s blind to remove Spider-Man from that context and codify that it’s what he specifically was about. 
“While limited, growth has happened for the character, and it tended to be in some of the better stories of the last decade plus. Whether starting to guide children like he himself once was in the solid early sections of J. Michael Straczynski and John Romita Jr.’s run on the main title; confronting the nature of his role as a superhero in relation to his villains and Peter Parker’s own role in society in Mark Millar, Terry Dodson and Frank Cho’s Marvel Knights: Spider-Man (a largely overlooked gem by the former, and the most traditional of his modern work besides perhaps his Fantastic Four run); having him take his mission to the next level in both technology and dedication in Dan Slott and Marcos Martin’s modern classic “No One Dies”; showing what would happen if Peter Parker finally started to pursue his dreams as well as his duties in Slott’s “Big Time”, or revealing what would happen to a Spider-Man who couldn’t grow in Superior Spider-Man under Slott again, Peter Parker can still keep moving forward one step at a time, still undergo the growth that informs his responsibilities which informs his growth and so and so on into forever, and still maintain what he is: the normal guy in the world of giants.”
 Okay...I actually agree with this but not the way you reached this conclusion via ‘He’s obviously ABOUT being a teen/growing up.’
  “At the time of writing, I’m soon to pick up the newly relaunched Amazing Spider-Man by Dan Slott and Humberto Ramos. Given that he wrote three of those examples I just listed, I have fairly high hopes.”
 Slot progessed Peter, then regressed him and even amidst all that he didn’t progress him in the right direction.
  You stated that he should be a normal guy. Slott turned him into a super scientist and then later a 1%er
  “This is going to be by the writer who had him come back from the dead in part by admitting that being Spider-Man is actually pretty fun.”
  It was also by the writer who turned Doc Ock into a rapist and proceeded to use him and variant versions of Spider-Man to show use how lame the original was before mutating the original into an Iron Man rip off.
 Hindsight sucks the big one I guess.
*Even if you say he came of age at the end of the movie the movie was one part of a three part story in which he spent most of his time NOT as a teen or someone growing up. He was just an adult.
**Also he more than anybody advocated and pushed for Peter to age forward into adult life experiences, such as parenthood even though his favourite era was Spider-Man as a high schooler (makes sense that was the era he began with). The fact that his fav era was Spider-Man as a teen and yet he maintains SPider-Man was never about youth and advocated for him to be MORE adult adds much to his credibility.
25 notes · View notes
yessadirichards · 5 years
Photo
Tumblr media
IOC admits postponing Olympics an option, but cancellation 'not on agenda'
The International Olympic Committee acknowledged which way the wind was blowing.
LAUSANNE - The International Olympic Committee said Sunday that postponing the 2020 Olympics is one of its options as the world grapples with the coronavirus pandemic, but that cancellation of the Tokyo showpiece was "not on the agenda".
The IOC has faced strong pressure to push back the Games, scheduled from July 24 to August 9, from sporting federations and athletes worried about the health risk as the COVID-19 global death tally went past 13,000 on Sunday.
IOC president Thomas Bach said a decision on when the Games take place would be made "within the next four weeks".
"Human lives take precedence over everything, including the staging of the Games," Bach wrote in an open letter to athletes.
"We have, as indicated before, been thinking in different scenarios and are adapting them almost day by day."
But, he added that "there are significant improvements in Japan" and he still had hopes the Games could be held on schedule, even if that would present logistical difficulties.
"A final decision about the date of the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020 now would still be premature," he said.
Bach explained that the IOC was discussing its options with health authorities and stakeholders.
"We are confident that we will have finalised these discussions within the next four weeks."
He made clear that there would a Games in Tokyo at some point.
"Cancellation would not solve any problem and would help nobody," Bach said. "Therefore it is not on our agenda."
- Thumbs down-
The idea of holding the Games on schedule has drawn a swelling chorus of objections.
On Sunday, nine-time Olympic track and field champion Carl Lewis, as well as the head of French athletics added their voices to the US and French swimming federations, the US and Spanish athletics federations, the Norwegian Olympic Committee and past and current athletes.
Sprinter and long jumper Lewis, who won gold at four different Olympics, told Houston television station KRIV, that he backed calls for postponement.
"I just think it's really difficult for an athlete to prepare, to train, to keep their motivation if there's complete uncertainty. That's the hardest thing," he said.
"I think a more comfortable situation would be two years and put it in the Olympic year with the Winter Olympics (Beijing 2022) and then make it kind of a celebratory Olympic year."
World Athletics, the governing body of track and field, said they were "ready to work with the IOC and all sport on an alternative date".
"World Athletics welcomes discussions with the IOC to postpone the Tokyo Olympic Games and wrote to the IOC earlier today to relay this feedback from its Area Presidents, Council and athletes," it said in a statement.
On Saturday, World Athletics president Sebastian Coe told AFP that the sporting world was in "uncharted territory".
"I don't think we should have the Olympic Games at all costs, certainly not at the cost of athlete safety," said Coe.
US media reported on Sunday that American athletes had voted during a virtual town hall with US Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC) officials and given Tokyo the thumbs down.
Almost three-quarters of the 300 athletes who met online with USOPC supported delaying the Games, USA Today reported.
In all, 70 percent of the athletes supported a postponement with another 23 percent saying it would depend on the consequences, according to details supplied by a member of the USOPC Athletes Advisory Council.
- 'Really selfish' -
Almost a quarter wanted a decision no later than April 15, while 18 percent wanted an immediate decision.
"I feel the IOC is being really, really selfish in trying to push it," US hammer thrower Gwen Berry said. "And there's no need to push it."
US swim and athletics trials to determine the nation's two largest Olympic delegations are set for June.
"The right and responsible thing to do is to prioritise everyone's health and safety and appropriately recognise the toll this difficult situation has, and continues to take, on our athletes and their Olympic Games preparations," said USA Track and Field chief Max Siegel.
"For those reasons, USATF is respectfully requesting that the USOPC advocate to the IOC for the postponement of the 2020 Olympic Games."
The head of the French athletics federation said postponement was inevitable.
"Everyone agrees that the Games cannot be held on the dates planned," Andre Giraud said.
"If the crisis is contained by the end of May, we can envisage a postponement of the Games to the autumn. But Plan C would be a six-month or one-year postponement," he said.
0 notes
the-legendaryboi · 16 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Rogue Sun (2022) #4
He remembers to say he loves his mom before leaving!
1 note · View note
tozoa · 8 years
Note
ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ♪: what are your favorite band(s)/artist(s)?
Hoooooboy this’ll take a minute:
ABBA 
AC/DC
Access
The Ad Libs
Afterburn
Agiman
Agnelli & Nelson
Ahmet Ertenu
Ai Otsuka
AiK
Airbase feat. Floria Ambra
Airwave
AKB48
Akeboshi
Aki Kudou
Akioka Ou
Akitaka Tohyama
Akon, Stat Quo & Bobby Creekwater
Alberto Ginastera
Alchemist
Alessia Cara
Alex Aero
Alex Clare
alex gopher
Alex Stealthy
Alex Whitcombe & Big C
Alexander Von Pitanic: Salzburg Camerata Academica
Alfred Hitchcock
Alice D In Wonderland
Alice in Chains
Alien Ant Farm
All American Rejects
Allegri
Allie Moss
Allister Brimble
The Allman Brothers Band
The Allman Joys
Allure
Aluto
Alvin Risk
AM
The Ambush
Amiina
Amilcare Ponchielli
Amy Lee
An Horse
Andain
André Visior & Kay Stone
Andrew Bayer
AndrewShumMusic
Andy Duguid 
angela
The Angels
Animotion
ann lee
Anna Calvi
ANNA TSUCHIYA inspi'NANA (BLACK STONES)
Annabel
Anointed
Antonín Dvořák
Antonio Montana
Antonio Vivaldi
Aoi Тeshima
Apocalyptica
Aquaplex
Arai Akino
The Archies
Archigram
Argonaut
Aria
Armin
Armor For Sleep
Arrakis
Art of Dying
Art Of Trance
Ashtar Command
Asou Kaori
Asuka Sakai / Yu Miyake
atfc
Atlantis
The Auranaut
autokratz
The Avalons
Avenged Sevenfold
AWOLNATION
Ayana
Ayla
Ayumi Hamasaki
Backstreet Boys
Balearic Bill
Ballroom
Bamboo Lounge
Banyan Tree
Baracoa
The Bar-Kays
Basic Perspective
Bastille
Danny Elfman
The Beach Boys
Beach House
Beachwood Sparks
Beady Eye
Bear McCreary
Beastie Boys                
The Beatles
Beck
Bee Gees
bellone
The Belmonts
Beltek
Ben Shaw
benassi bros
Benzino
Berlin Symphony Orchestra
Bernhard Güller: Stuttgart Chamber Orchestra
Bert Weedon
Best Coast
Bibio
Biffy Clyro
Bill Elm and Woody Jackson
Bill Haley & The Comets
Billie Ray Martin
Billy Idol
Binary Finary
Bing Crosby
the biz
Bizarre
Black Lips
The Black Ryder
Frank Black
Blank & Jones 
Bless The Fallen
Blink-182
Blood For Blood
Blood Red Shoes
Blue Gender
Blue Rock
The Bluetones
Bo Burnham
BOA
Bob & Gene
Bobby “Boris” Pickett & The Crypt-Kickers
Bobby Creekwater
Bobby Tank
Bokusatsu Tenshi Dokuro-chan
Bon Jovi
Bone Chrusher & Three Days Gra
Bonnie Tyler
Booty Bronx
Botany
Boy & Bear
A Boy Called Joni
boys noize
Brad Knauber
the bravery
Breaking Benjamin
BREAKWATER
Breeder
Brendon Maclean
Brian Eno
Brian Lebarton
Bride of Frankenstein
Bright Eyes
Britney Spears
Broken Social Scene
Brooks and Dunn
Brother
Bruce Faulconer
BT
Buckner & Garcia
The Budos Band
The Buggles
Bulgarian Womens Choir
Bullitt
The Buoys
Steve Burns
BYPASS
Bystrik Režucha: Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra
Cabala
cajuan
Camerata Academica Salzburg
Camerata Romana
Camille Saint-Saëns
Canibus
Canvas2 
Canyon
Cappizzi Pickett
Carl B.
Carl Doy
Carl Michalski: Vienna Opera Orchestra
Carl Perkins
Carly Rae Jepsen
Cary Brothers
Casa Royale
Cascada
Cashis
Cass
The Phantom of the Opera
Catcher
Cave Man
Cavo
CeCe Winans
CERRONE
Chad & Jeremy
CHAKA KHAN
Channel Tribe
Chant
The Chantays
Charles Gounod
Charlotte Martin
Charm City Devils
Chata
Cheap Trick
The Chemical Brothers
Chicane
Chieko Kawabe
Chiho
Chikita Violenta
Chiller Twist
The Chimes
Choopie & Shmuel
Chopin
Choro Club
Chouken Denkanyuu
Christina Aguilera
Christy Nockels
Chronamut
Chrono Crusade
Chuck Berry
Cignus X
Cindy Morgan
The Civil Wars
CJ Bolland
Clannad
Clarence “Frogman” Henry
The Classics
Classified Project
Claude Debussy
Clear View
Clive Tanaka Y Su Orquesta
Cloud 69
Clouded Leopard
Club Quake
Matrix soundtrack
C-Murder
Coast 2 Coast
Coca & Villa
Cold
Cold Cave
Coldplay
Commission
Conjure One
Connie Francis
Continuous Cool
The Contours
Control Freaks
The Cowsills
Crash and the Boys
Cressida
The Crests
Crispin Glover
Crydajam
Cryoshell
Culture Club
Curtis Mayfield
Cut Copy
D
D’ Alt Vila
D.R.U.G.S.
D12
Daft Punk
dahlback & cost
The Daktaris
Dale Hawkins
The Danleers
Danny & The Juniors
Danny Elfman
DarkMateria
Darkstar
DARLIN’
Datarock
dataworx
Dave Angel
dave spoon
david guetta
David Hasselhoff
David Hodges
David MeShow
Dawes
Dawnseekers
De Hideki
De Trainer Derek
Deadlock
Deadmau5
Dean Martin
DearS
Death Cab For A Cutie
Del Shannon
Delerium
Denchuu Shinkyuu
Deniro
Depeche Mode
Der Dritte Raum
DeVotchKa
Dexys Midnight Runners
The Diamonds
Die Firma
digitalism
Dimrain47
Dion & The Belmonts
Dionne Warwick
Disparition
Disturbed
DJ Cor Fijneman
DJ Crazy Chris
DJ Dazzle
DJ Eremit
DJ Hooligan
DJ Jan
Dj Kitkiller
DJ Marco Bailey
DJ Merlyn
DJ Morgoth
DJ Philip
DJ Skee & THX
DJ Slug
DJ Tiësto
DJ Ton T.B.
DJ TripleStar
Dj-janer
djt93901
Dmitri Kabalevsky
DNAngel
Do As Infinity
Dobre & DJ Theor
DOKAKA
Dokmai
Dom
Dom Kennedy
Dominic Plaza
Dominion
Don & Juan
Don Burnham, Patty Kistner
Donna Burke
Dos Deviants
Douster, Savage Skulls & Robyn
Dove Beat
Dr. Dre
The Dreamlovers
The Drifters
Drumfire
Duane Allman
Dubravka Tomšič
The Duprees
Duran Duran
Dylaln Lloyd
E Nomine
Earl Lewis & The Channels
EDDIE JOHNS
Eddy Arnold
Edvard Grieg
Edward MacDowell
EDWIN BIRDSONG
Ef 
Effective Force
Eiko Shimamiya
El Trono de Mexico
Electric Pulse
electric six
Electro-Prompt
Elie
ELISA
Ellie Goulding
Elvis Presley
The Embers
Emigrate
Emika
Eminem
Emmanuel Top
equaleyes
Es Vedra
Escaflowne
Essit Muzique
Estuera
The Eternals
Eufonius
Eurythmics
Evanescence
Eve
Everlast
The Everly Brothers
Evolver
Existone
Exit
Fabiana
faithless
Fall Out Boy
Falling in Reverse
Fanfarlo
Fantasia
FAT JoE
Fats Domino
Faylan
Feeling B
Felix Da Housecat
Felix Mendelssohn
Fictivsion
Field Music
Friend
Filterheadz
Finger Eleven
Fire & Ice
First Aid Kit
First Arsch
First Class
First State
fischerspooner
The Five Americans
Five Finger Death Punch
Fix To Fax
The Fixx
The Flamingos
Flipsyde
FLOW
Fluid Inc.
Fluid Ounces
Flyleaf
Fontella Bass
Fonzerelli
Fool’s Gold
Format #1
Fortress
Foster
Foster the People
The Four Lads
Four Seasons
Four Tet
The Four Tops
Fox
francesco farfa
Francis Poulenc
Frank Black
Frank Shipway: Royal Philharmonic Orchestra
Frank Sinatra
Frankie Goes To Hollywood
Frankie Lymon & The Teenagers
Frankie Valli & The Four Seasons
František Drdla
Franz Ferdinand
Franz Liszt
Franz Schubert
Franz Von Suppé
The Fray
Fred Baker
Freddy Cannon
Frédéric Chopin
Free Radical
Fridge
fripSide
G. Love
Gabriel & Dresden
Gabriel Pares
Gabrielle
Gackt
Gaetano Donizetti
Gakupo
The Game
Games
Garrett Davis and Kirsten Lepore
Gary Chapman
Gela Zilkha
GEORGE DUKE
George Frideric Handel
George Thorogood & The Destroyers
Georges Bizet
The Gift
Gilbert O'Sullivan
Gioachino Rossini
Girls Bravo
Giuseppe Verdi
Glasser
Glenn Morisson
Global Experience
Gôji Tsuno
golden bug
Goldenscan
goldfrapp
Goo Goo Dolls
Good Charlotte
Gorillaz
Gotou Mai
Gouryella
gracia
Graeme Norgate, Grant Kirkhope
Grayarea feat. Erik Shepard
Grease
Green Day
The Green Martian
Green Martian
Greg Vail
Groove Park
Groovezone
Groundswell
GTR
Gucci Mane
Gui Boratto
Guy Mitchell
Gwen Stefani
H.I.M
Hadouken!
Haga Keita
Hal David, John Cacavas
Hamaguchi Shirou
Hammock Brothers
Hans Zimmer
Harada Hitomi
Hardy Heller and Ray Boye
Harry Bluestone
Harry Lubin
Harry101UK
Hashimoto Miyuki
Hatsune Miku
Hayes Carll
Hazuki Erino
heartless1298
Helen Forrest
Hélène Gal
Hello Seahorse!
Henry Adolph: Philharmonia Slavonica
Henry Jackman
Henry Mancini
Hensha
Herb Alpert
Hermann Abel: Camerata Academica Salzburg
HH
Hideki Tobeta
HIR
Hirasawa Susumu
Hirohashi Ryou
Hiroko Taguchi
Hironobu Kageyama
Hiroshi Okubo
hitomi
Holden & Thompson
Hole In One
Holly Miranda
Holy Ghost!
Hoobastank
Horie Yui
Hotel Lights
The Hour Glass
The Hues Corporation
Hundred Waters
Hybrid
Hyperdrive Inc
I:Cube
Ian Pooley
Ice Cube
Ichigo 100%
Ichiko
Idiot Pilot
Ikimonogakari
Ikkitousen
Ilaria Graziano
The Imaginations
Imagine Dragons
Imogen Heap
The Inchtabokatables
Indigoflare
Infected Mushroom
in-grid
The Ink Spots
Inoi team
Insigma
Interflow
The Interludes
Iommi
Ishida Yoko
The Isley Brothers
Israel Kamakawiwo'ole
Itou Shizuka
Iyukai
J Daniel
J. Geils Band
J.E. Sawyer
J.E. Sawyer, James Melilli
J.S. Bach
Ja Rule
Jack Wall and Sam Hulick
Jackie & The Starlights
Jackson C. Frank
Jacques Offenbach
Jadakiss
Jaimy & Kenny D
Jakatta feat. Seal
Jake & Jesse
James Iha
Jamie Grace
Jamie Lidell
Jan Driver
Jan Johnston
Jars Of Clay
JASEfos feat. Claire van der Boom
Jason Graves
Jason Michael Carroll
Jason Steele
Jay & The Americans
Jaytech
Jay-Z
Jean Sudbury
Jedidja
Jeff Williams
Jeremy Fisher
Jericho
Jermaine Dupri
Jerome ‘Pacman’ Elia
JERRY GOLDSMITH
Jerry Lee Lewis
Jerry Ropero
JES
Jesper Kyd
Jetta
Jimang
Jimmy Charles
The Jive Five
joachim garraud
Johan Gielen pres. Abena
Johann Pachelbel
Johann Sebastian Bach
Johann Strauss
Johann Strauss Jr.
Johannes Brahms
John Dahlback
John Farnham
Johnny Bond
Johnny Cash
Johnny Preston
Johnny Thunder
Joker Jam
Joman
Jon Lajoie
Jonas Steur
The Jones Sisters
Jose Gonzalez
Joseph Haydn - Kodaly Quartet
Journey
JPL
JT Functions
Judas Priest
Jukai
Julia Fischer & Academy of St. Martin In the Fields
Julien-K
Julius Drake & Ian Bostridge
Jun Sasaki
Junkie Xl
Junko Nishi
Jyukai
Kagami Seira
Kagamine Len
Kagamine Rin
Kageyama Hironobu
Kai Tracid
Kaito
Kakazu Yumi, Asakawa Yuu, Orikasa Fumiko & Toyoguchi Megumi
Kalafina
Kalafut & Fygle
Kaleido Star
Kamaya Painters
Kamui
Kamui Gakupo
Kane & Abel 
Kanno Youko
Kanye West
KAORI
Kaori Utatsuki
Karen Overton
KAREN YOUNG
Karin
Katamari Soul Trains
Katie Thompson
Katou Idzumi
Katsuro Tajima
Katy Perry
Kawada Mami
Kawai Eri
Kawai Kenji
Kawasumi Ayako
Kay Kyser
Kazuki Yanagawa
Kazuma Jinnouchi
Kei Shindou
Kekou Souchi
Ken Nakagawa
Kenji Ohtsuki & Fumihiko Kitsutaka
KID
Kidz In the Hall
Kikuko Inoue
The Killers
Kim Ann Foxman & Andy Butler
kim fai
Kimito Lopez
King Unique
KINYA
kirina
Kirk Franklin & The Family
Kitagawa Katsutoshi
Kitagawa Shouri
Kitamura Eri
KIYO
Kiyoura Natsumi
kmc feat. sandy
KOAN Sound
Kobayashi
Koda kumi
Kôji Kaya
KOKIA
Konami Kukeiha Club
Konishi Kayo & Kondoo Yukio
Kool & the Gang
Korn
kos
KOTOKO
Kourin
K-taro Takanami
Kubota Mina
Kugimiya Rie
Kuko
Kuko & Torikki SHirai
Kuko & Yasumi
Brett Kull
Kumi Koda
Kuniva (D12)
Kusakanmuri
Kuwashima Houko
Kyary Pamyu Pamyu
L.S.G.
La Gusana Ciega
La Roux
La Sera
Lain
Larry Hall
Late Night Alumni
Laura Veirs
Laurence Siegel: London Festival Orchestra
LCD Soundsystem
Le Butcherettes
Le Knight Club
Leama
Ledisi
Lee Andrews & The Hearts
Lee Fields
Lemon 8
Léo Delibes
Leon Bolier pres. Inner Stories
Leonid Rudenko
Les Charts
les visiteurs feat. tommie sunshine
Leslie Gore
The Letter Y
Level 42
Lex
Lia
Liam Finn
Libor Pešek: Slovak Philharmonic Orchestra
Life According To Bozo
Lily
Linda Perhacs
Linkin Park
John Linnell
Lionel Richie
Lisa Coleman & Wendy Melvoin
lisa miskovsky
LITTLE ANTHONY & THE IMPERIALS
Little Big Man
Little Tin Frog
Lloyd Banks feat. Akon
LMFAO
LN Movement
LNQ
Local Natives
Lock
Logan Whitehurst
Loic Bertrand: Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra
The London Symphony Orchestra
The Lonely Island
LONG SHOT PARTY
The Long Winters
Loop Control
looseheadz
Lord Of Trance
Lost Weekend Western Swing Band
Lou Christie
Lou Reed & Metallica
LOVERIN TAMBURIN
Lucinda Williams
Ludwig Van Beethoven
Luminary
Lyle Workman
M.I.K.E.
Mac Miller
Mac Zimms
Mack 10
MadamEdea
Madness
Mads Arp
Magdalene Keibel Combo
Mai Kadowaki
Mai Yamane
Major League
Makino Yui
Malcolm McLaren
Malibu Beach
The Mamas & The Papas
Mami Kawada
Man On Earth
Manna
Mannheim Steamroller
Mantovani
Maor Levi
MAORICA
Maracca
Marathons
Marc Marzenit
Marco Bailey
Marcus Schossow
Mariàn Pivka
Marica
Mariko Takase
Marilyn Manson
mario piu’
Mark Mancina
Mark Norman
Marmalade Boy
Maroon 5
Martian Successor Nadesico
Martin ODonnell
Martin Rex
Marty Robbins
Masako Iwanaga
Masako Nozawa & Mayumi Sho
Masami Nakatsukasa
Masami Okui
Mason
Mass Missile
Master P Feat. Bone Thugs-N-Harmony & Silkk The Shocker
Mastodon
The Mat 1 EP
Matchbox Twenty
mathias schaffhauser
Matt Lange
Matt Nathanson
matt samuels
Maurice F. Henschel: Pretoria Philharmonic Orchestra
Maurice Ravel
Mauro Picotto
Max Graham
Max Raabe & Palast Orchester
Maximum The Hormone
Maxwell
maya
May'n & Nakajima Megumi
Mayumi Fujita
The McCoys
Mechalie Jamison
meg rock
Megumi Hayashibara
Megumi Nakajima
Megurine Luka
Mejale Pirates
Mekka
MELL
Memory Tapes
Menahan Street Band
Mermaid Melody
Metallica
Metric
Mi
Mia X Feat. Mystikal
Michael Armstrong
Michael Giacchino
Michael Jackson
Michael McCann
Michael W. Smith
Michoacan
Mick Boogie
The Micronauts
Middle Class Rut
Midori no Hibi
Midway
The Mighty Imperials
Miguel
Mike Morasky
Mikerobenics
Mikuni Shimokawa
David Miller
Milos Karadaglic
The Mindbenders
Minnie Riperton
Mishka
Mitch Ryder & The Detroit Wheels
Mitsunori Ikeda 
Miyuki Hashimoto
Miyuki Kanbe
Mizuki Nana
Mizuki, Nittoku Inoue
Mockba
Modest Mouse
Mono Puff
Monolith
MONORAL
The Monotones
Montell Jordan
Moogwai
Moonbeam
moonbootica
Motocraft
Motorcitysoul
Motorcycle
Movado
Movie Screen Orchestra
Mozzart
Murray Gold & BBC National Orchestra of Wales
Mutemath
My Chemical Romance
My Darkest Days
Mylene Farmer et Seal
Mystery Skulls
Mystical
myuu
Nakajima Ai
Nalin & Kane
Nana
Nana Kitade
Naomi Davis & Sugarman Three
Naomi Shelton & The Gospel Queens
Nat King Cole
Natural High
Naughty Boy
NCB
Neil Davidge
New Vaudeville Band
Newsboys
Nic Chagall
Nice Peter
Nickelson
The Nightcaps
Nihils
Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov
Nino Nardini
Nino/Round Table
Nirvana
Noa Assembly
Nobuo Uematsu, Nittoku Inoue
Norato
Norin & Rad
Notorious B.I.G
NY Alliance
Obie Trice
Obie, Kuniva, Stat Quo, Bobby Creekwater, Cashis
Odyssee
Ohara Sayaka
Ohmi Tomoe
Ohmna
OK Go
Okui Aki
OLIVER CHEATHAM
Oliver Lieb
Oliver Von Dohnányi: Slovak National Phiharmonic Orchestra
Olivia Lufkin
The Olympics
Omori Toshiyuki
One Republic
Oomori Toshiyuki
oOoOO
ORANGE RANGE
Orbital Velocity
Orgasm Death Gimmick
The Oriëntalist
Orita Donichi
Oscar Araujo
Otomania
The Outlaws
Owl City
Ozgur Can
P.O.S.
Pablo Gargano
The Pains of Being Pure At Heart
Palast Orchester mit Max Raabe
Panic! At The Disco
Papa Roach
Paradise Kiss
Paradise Road
Paramore
Parker & Hanson
Patrick Stump
Patty & the Emblems
Paul Johnson
Paul Oakenfold
Pearl Kyoudai
Peggy Lee
Pendulum
The Penguins
Percy Faith
Pete Thomas, Ashley Slater, Laurie Stras
Peter Falk: Vienna Volksoper Orchestra
Peter Schmalfuss
Petter
Petula Clark
N'Sync
phil collins
Phuture
Pink Elephant
Plain White T’s
planet funk
Planisphere
Plastic Boy
The Platters
Plumtree
Pob feat. X-Avia
The Poets of Rhythm
Point Of Grace
Kanto Symphony
The Polyphonic Spree
PoppinS
Porno Graffitti
Port O'Brien
Powerman 5000
PrEmoEffect
Eliza Rickman
Prince
The Prodigy
Project Monolith
Proof
PSY
Puddle of Mudd
Puhdys
PULLTOP
Pulser
Push
PWB
Qattara
QMAVALLOW
Quadran
Queen
R Kelly
R.O.N
Rachael Starr
Rammstein
Rank 1
rava
Rawrthaas
Ray Conniff
Read or Die
Reba McEntire
Rebecca St. James
Rec
Recepter
Rei
Reinhard Voigt
Renato Girolami, Nicolaus Esterhazy Sinfonia, Hungarian Radio Chorus, Janusz Monarcha, Regina Schorg & Bo Skovhus
Reprise
The Republic Tigers
Reynada Hill
rhu
Richard Gibbs
Richard Marx
Richard Strauss
Richie Valens
Rick James
Rick Springfield
Ricky Martin
Rie Tanaka
Rihanna
Rin Kagimine
Rise Against
Riva
Rival Sons
The Rivieras
RJD2
Roach Motel
Rob Searle
robbie rivera
Robert Babicz
Robert Benfer
Robert Francis
Robert Palmer
Robert Schumann
Robin Beanland
The Roc Project
Rocky Chack
Rodrigo y Gabriela
the rogue element
The Rolling Stones
Ronnie And The Schoolmates
Ronnie Dove
The Roots
The Roues Brothers
Roy Orbison
Royal Philharmonic Orchestra
The Royal Teens
Roze
Rui Da Silva
Rui Nagai
rune rk
Russ Gabriel’s Audio Spectrum
S.B. McCafferty
Saint Seiya
Saitou Chiwa
Sakamoto Maaya
Sakin
Salia
Salt Tank
Sam The Sham & The Pharaohs
Sambuca
San
Sander Van Doorn & Julian Jordan
Sandor Czech Ensemble
Sandy Fox
Saori Nishihata
Sasaki Nozomi
Sasako Shigeharu
Satoko Yamano & Kageyama…
scanty 88
Schiller
School Of Rock
Scoop
score
Scott Grooves
Seabear
Seal
Sean Dexter
Seatbelts
Sebastian Tellier
The Second Coming
Seether
Self
Senoo Takeshi
Serial Experiments Lain
Serj Tankian
Sex Bomb-Omb
Shah & Laruso pres. Global Experience
The Shangri-Las
Sharon Jones & The Dap-Kings
SHARP 2
Sharp Tools
She Keeps Bees
The Shells
Sheryl Nome starring May'n
The Shields
Shigeru Matsuzaki
Shikata Akiko
Shimamiya Eiko
Shinedown
Shinichi Ishihara
Shinji Orito/Magome Togoshi
Shiny Toy Guns
Shoji Sugiyama, Yu Miyake
Show Luo Feat. Koda Kumi
SID
Sierra Swan
sikk
Silent Breed
SiLK
silvercity
Simon
Simple Minds
Sinichi Ishihara
Sisko
Sister Princess
SISTER SLEDGE
Skillet
Skrillex
Skull Drugrey
The Skyliners
Slipknot
Small Black
Smart System
The Smashing Pumpkins
Smith & Pledger pres. Aspekt
SMS no Minasan
The Sneaker
Snoop Dogg
Snow Patrol
Soft Cell
The Soft Pack
Solar Factor
Solar Stone
Solar Stone and JES
Solaris Heights
Solid Globe
Solkrieg
sonique
SONOROUS
Soulja Slim
South London Voodoo
Space Shuffle
The Spainiels
Sparklehorse
Spiral
Split Second
Squeeze
Staind
Stardust
Stat Quo
A Static Lullaby
Steady Mobbin
Steam
Stephen Rippy
Steve Conte
Steve Forte Rio
Steve Jablonsky
Steve May
Steve Winwood
Steven Curtis Chapman
Stone Factory
Stone Sour
Strauss
Stray Cats
Stray Dog
streetlife dj’s
Strong Arm Steady
Stuck in the Sound
The Students
Styles Of Beyond
Styxx
Suara
Sugarman Three
Sum 41
SUN
Sunburst
Sunday Club
Superspy
The Supremes
Surfer Blood
Susan Ashton
Susumu Hirasawa
Suzuki Konomi
Svetlana Stanceva; Alberto Lizzio: Mozart Festival Orchestra
Swifty McVay & Mr. Porter
The Swimmer
Sylvia Cápová
Symphony Of Love II
System of a Down
Systematic Parts
T. Rex
T.L.T.
Tainaka Sachi
Takahashi Youko
Takeshi Senoo
Taking Back Sunday
Talib Kweli
Taneri
Tastexperience
TATA VEGA
Taucher
Taxigirl
TCY Force
Tears For Fears
Teddyloid
Teebs
Teikoku Yousei
The Temper Trap
The Temptations
TENMON & Eiichiro Yanagi / minori
Tex Beneke and Margaret Whiting
Theory Of A Dead Man
They Might Be Giants
Third Man
This Radiant Boy
Thomas Bangalter
Thomas Schumacher
The Thompson Twins
Three Days Grace
Three Drives
Tiger Army
Till Lindemann & Richard Kruspe
Tilt
Timothy Bloom
Tina Turner
TLC
Todd Rundgren
Together
Tokyo Mew Mew
TOM
Tom Cloud
Tom Mangan
Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers
tomas andersson
Tommy James & The Shondells
Tomoe Ohmi
Tomoki Hasegawa
Tomomitsu Kaneko
Tony Yayo
Toro y Moi
Melanie Martinez
Jason Trachtenburg
Tranquilizer
Transa
Tremor
Trigun
The Troggs
Tupac
Turboweekend
Twila Paris
Twilight
Twilight-Perception
Two Steps from Hell
U2
UGK Feat. N.O. Joe
UNDER17
The Used
Ushio Hashimoto
Utada Hikaru
Utah Saints
UVERworld
V6
The Vaccines
Vanessa Mae
VDM
Vegas Soul
The Veil Kings
Vengaboys
The Videos
Vimana
Vince Guaraldi Trio
Vincent de Moor
Viper 2
Vitamin String Quartet
Vitaminless
Vladimir Petroschoff: Berliner Festival Orchestra
The Vogues
Voltaire
Vondelpark
The Voyager
V-Three
W.A. Mozart
Wada Kaoru
Waffle
Wang Chung
the wanted
Way Out West
Wayne Fontana & The Mindbenders
Weird Al Yankovic
West & Storm
Wheed Baskin
The Whigs
White Lies
White Rabbits
Wighnomy Bros.
Wild Bunch
Will.I.Am
William Elliot Whitmore
William Fitzsimmons
William Hartnell
The Willows
Wiz Khalifa
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Woods
World Clique
The Wrens
Xero
Xzibit
Yahel
Yanase Natsumi
Yanni
Yasunori Iwasaki
Yeasayer
Ylvis
Yo Hitoto
Yoko
Yoko Kanno
Yoshino Yuuji
Youko Ishida
Young Parisians
Yousei Teikoku
Yu Miyake
Yui Horie
Yuka
Yuka
Yuri Misawa
Yves DeRyter
Zack Knight
zdar
Zedd
Zoo Brazil
12 notes · View notes
allspark · 6 years
Text
It’s time for our weekly Diamond Comics Shipping List! Check out some great titles IDW has in store for us next week like G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero, Marvel Action Spider-Man, Sonic the Hedgehog, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and much more! All coming your way for November 28th!
GI JOE A REAL AMERICAN HERO TP VOL 21
Larry Hama (A) Alex Sanchez, David Messina, Brian Shearer, Netho Diaz, Alisson Rodrigues, Harvey Tolibao (CA) John Royle (A/CVR) Jagdish Kumar
The new Snake Eyes, Dawn Moreno, has generated excitement and new fan interest in the G.I. Joe brand. G.I. Joe. Cobra. Two opposing forces. Two powerful war machines, each made more lethal by the undeniable strength of their individual parts. But who and what are those parts? Living legend Larry Hama shares some of their amazing tales in “Special Missions”-five one-shot stories featuring a variety of characters including Stalker, Baroness, Duke, and more-each illustrated by a different world-class artist! Collects issues #251-255.
ATOMIC EMPIRE HC
Thierry Smolderen (A/CVR) Alexandre Clerisse
An astonishing and captivating original graphic novel by Thierry Smolderen and Alexandre Clérisse. Inspired by a real psychological case, Atomic Empire is both a psychiatric enigma and a space opera.
1953: The world has entered the age of the Atom, but one man wonders what it means for civilization. His name is Paul-a sci-fi writer who, since childhood, has been in telepathic contact with a hero from the distant future. But when a well-known Pentagon consultant begins to take an interest in him, “the man who communicates with the future” will commit an unforgivable sin and break an oath to his friend Zarth Arn, hero of the Galactic Empire.
Smolderen and Clérisse deliver a beautiful and contemporary tale, immersed in the fluid and aerodynamic imagery of 1950s sci-fi.
HIGHEST HOUSE TP
Mike Carey (A) Peter Gross (CVR) Yuko Shimizu
To be born a slave is in fact not a fatality. And facts can be changed. In the country of Ossaniul, there is a fortress that is as disproportionate as it is inaccessible: the Highest House. Its masters, the noble family of Aldercrest, reign over a veritable army of slaves. At the bottom of the ladder, young Moth performs the most thankless tasks and has little hope of living past childhood. Until the day he meets Obsidian, a mysterious prisoner of the House who whispers to him in his sleep. If Moth does what he asks, Obsidian will give him fortune and glory. And there’s every indication that Obsidian can make good on his promises. Will Moth accept the offer?
Through a subtle alternate history, The Highest House takes us to a fictional country reminiscent of the Balkan kingdoms of the 16th century. Mike Carey and Peter Gross (Lucifer, The Unwritten) draw from this context a captivating fantasy narrative that reflects on the human soul, the corrupting power of slavery, and the inequalities of class, all from the different perspectives of the House’s many inhabitants. Both immediate and timeless, Highest House is a multifaceted fantasy sure to stay with readers long after the final page has turned.
•   Advance solicited for November release! •   From the creators of The Unwritten, twice nominated for a Hugo Award!
MARVEL ACTION SPIDER-MAN #1
Delilah S Dawson (A/CVR A) Fico Ossio
Readers of all ages can get tangled up in these all new adventures of Spider-Man and his astonishing friends! Peter Parker has thrown down with deadly villains and legendary heroes, but high school life might be his greatest challenge yet. Luckily, he has a shot at making the grade with a little help from his new friends… Miles Morales and Gwen Stacy! A Marvelous new era begins here!
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG #11
Ian Flynn (A/CVR B) Tracy Yardley (CVR A) Jon Gray
“The Battle for Angel Island,” Part Three! Sonic and Knuckles are on the ropes as their foe uses the power of the Master Emerald to become a far more formidable threat! Meanwhile, the rest of the Resistance faces off against the entirety of the Eggman Empire’s Fleet… but can they win?
SUPERMAN SILVER AGE SUNDAYS HC VOL 01
Jerry Siegel (A) Wayne Boring (CVR) Peter Poplaski
A comprehensive series that remedies a gap in comics history, bringing back all the Superman Sunday strips-among the character’s rarest collectibles-as co-creator Jerry Siegel returns to writing duties. In these 18 classic adventures from October 18, 1959, to January 20, 1963, the Man of Steel meets “The Kryptonite Girl” and his “Mermaid Sweetheart.” Also featured are Superman’s “Greatest Feats,” “The Super Powers of Perry White,” “The Invasion of the Super-Ants,” and “The Creature of 1,000 Disguises,” among other early ’60s tales drawn by Wayne Boring.
TMNT MACROSERIES #3 LEONARDO
Sophie Campbell (A/CVR B) Sophie Campbell (CVR A) David Petersen
Leonardo seeks refuge in Northampton but danger follows-in the form of Koya and Karai! An epic throwdown will result in Leo making a drastic decision that will quickly alter the course of TMNT history!
•   An oversized extravaganza from TMNT superstar artist Sophie Campbell!
TMNT ONGOING #88
Tom Waltz, Kevin Eastman (A/CVR A) Dave Wachter (CVR B) Kevin Eastman
“Battle Lines,” Part 3 of 3. The TMNT, Bishop, and their respective allies come to a climactic battle that will have devastating consequences for many!
•   An epic battle that’s not to be missed!
UNCLE SCROOGE MY FIRST MILLIONS #3
Fausto Vitaliano (A) Stefano Intini (CVR A) Marco Gervasio
After amassing a fortune of two million dollars, you’d think that Scrooge McDuck would be content. Far from it-if there’s potential for more, Uncle Scrooge won’t rest until he’s richer! “My Third Million” finds Scrooge in unusual circumstances, and richer in both money and experience.
•   The third of four issues detailing how Uncle Scrooge made his first four million dollars! •   It’s Uncle Scrooge like you’ve never seen him before…mostly! •   Brand-new covers make this miniseries a special one for fans of all ages!
  Join the IDW Hasbro Shared Universe related conversation here in our Comics Discussion and Reviews section and here for all other franchises, superheroes, or general comic book discussions! Not a member? Join our community by creating your own free account here! Or jump right into the live chat on our Discord server or our Facebook Group!
IDW Comics Shipping List for November 28th! It’s time for our weekly Diamond Comics Shipping List! Check out some great titles IDW has in store for us next week like 
0 notes
guybautista09-blog · 7 years
Text
I Miss My Ex-spouse Partner Or Partner
We typically try to think about brand-new methods and also implies to make points a little bit of fun each time, particularly at family members close friend's events. You view, he also was actually such an incredible person, you were his premium lady, he was your high quality guy, as well as I recognize that he is actually still listed below along with our team, I recognize, that like our team, he is really happy with our Super Nan! The first thing that I took my girl poured me was actually to phone her as well as persuade her to give me an additional odds. Accepting: A friend allows you for what you are actually, regardless of what the globe thinks about you. The expense coincides for the return accommodation shuttle bus to LAX Super Shuttle demands $38 for the 1st individual as well as $9 for each added guest for the exact same vacation. Ask if this is explored personally, if required and also if there is actually an added cost for that solution. , if you can easily not discuss your sensations along with your pals you could not develop a gold relationship and can easily never be actually a friend. A Super Little one can take care of to answer just what ever type of concerns might his instructor seeks. I want to thank you for being actually a genuine friend to me throughout each of these years as well as for being thus persistent along with me. Ideal Sellers: Property Super Assurance, Winning At Life, Effectiveness Mind-Sets, Residing Invincibly Favorable, The Strategy © -Peter C. Siegel, R.H Chatting along with them is just the component that falters them in. As well as the poor child understands the best ways to inform her just what she desires to listen to. Some individuals simply function these added jobs for a handful of months, or they will certainly work them for longer relying on what they require the cash for. If you go straight back in to the way that you regularly behaved around her, then she is actually visiting simply return to finding you as a close friend as well as certainly not as a possible enthusiast. Engaging all together in Halloween festivities with your favored furry close friend is one more option for you to cherish your time all together. Peter's big actors of characters in Outstanding Spider-Man includes his soul mate Mary Jane Watson, best friend Harry Osborne, his departed past passion Gwen Stacey, senior high school good friend beauty-ann-portal.info Flash Thompson, Daily Bugle publisher J. Jonah Jameson alongside several other DB staff, and certainly his Aunt May, amongst a lot of others. She desires to obtain a lot interest, opportunity as well as love as possible without having to quit anything, therefore you will certainly remain in her eyes simply a close friend. Its own springtime break once more and also lastly, I received an invite from a close friend which desires me to find to Lengthy coastline and also devote a couple of days there certainly to have some exciting in the sunshine.
0 notes
klausming · 7 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Laugh, Clown, Laugh (1928) US 74m, B&W, Silent Director: Herbert Brenon; Cast: Lon Chaney, Loretta Young, Nils Asther, Bernard Siegel, Cissy Fitzgerald, Gwen Lee…
0 notes