#Ghazipur gram panchayat elections
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Ghazipur Panchayat Chunav 2021: गाजीपुर की आरक्षण लिस्ट जारी, जानें महिलाओं के लिए कितनी सीटें हैं रिजर्व
Ghazipur Panchayat Chunav 2021: गाजीपुर की आरक्षण लिस्ट जारी, जानें महिलाओं के लिए कितनी सीटें हैं रिजर्व
उत्तर प्रदेश के त्रिस्तरीय पंचायत चुनाव. Uttar Pradesh Gram Panchayat Aarakshan List: यूपी के पंचायती राज विभाग द्वारा त्रिस्तरीय पंचायत चुनाव के लिए जिलेवार आरक्षण सूची जारी कर दी गई है. हम आपके लिए लाए हैं गाजीपुर (Ghazipur) की आरक्षण सूची के बारे में सभी जानकारियां. गाजीपुर. उत्तर प्रदेश के त्रिस्तरीय पंचायत चुनाव (UP Panchayat Chunav 2021) को लेकर इंतजार अब खत्म हो गया है और राज्य के…
View On WordPress
#Ghazipur gram panchayat elections#gram panchayat aarakshan list#up gram panchayat chunav aarakshan list#up gram panchayat elections reservation list 2021#UP Panchayat Chunav 2021#up panchayat chunav aarakshan list#uttar pradesh gram panchayat elections 2021#बाराबंकी ग्राम पंचायत आरक्षण लिस्ट#यूपी पंचायत चुनाव आरक्षण सूची
0 notes
Text
West Bengal panchayat elections: Bullets, bombs kill 3; top 10 developments
The single-phase West Bengal panchayat election is underway amid tight security. Several reports of clashes have emerged from various districts in which dozens of people have been injured. Further, violence broke out in North 24 Parganas, Burdwan, Coochbehar, and South 24 Parganas districts, killing three people and injuring at least 21.
Trinamool Congress (TMC) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have accused each other of the violence.
It is the last major election in the state before next year's Lok Sabha elections.
With 40 of the 42 Lok Sabha seats located in the districts, political parties are viewing Monday's polls as a warm-up match ahead of the 2019 general elections.
The three-tier panchayat polls are being held in the state after a protracted legal battle in the Kolkata High Court and the Supreme Court involving the state election commission, the TMC, and opposition parties.
In North 24 Parganas, a Communist Party of India (Marxist), or CPM, worker and his wife were read more
#West Bengal panchayat election#west bengal gram panchayat elections#west bengal rural polls#west bengal panchayat polls violence#TMC#BJP#Uttar Ghazipur
1 note
·
View note
Text
UP Gram Panchayat election 2021: Yogi govt releases reservation list, transfers 18 IAS officers
UP Gram Panchayat election 2021: Yogi govt releases reservation list, transfers 18 IAS officers
New Delhi: For the upcoming three-tier Uttar Pradesh gram panchayat elections, the state administration has released the reservation list for some of the seats. The districts for which the reservation list has come out include Varanasi, Kannoj, Rampur, Sambhal, Kasganj, Amethi, Moradabad, Meerut, Ballia, Fatehpur, Hardoi, Ghaziabad, Mirzapur, Ghazipur, Bhadohi, Banda, Pratapgarh, Firozabad, and…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting was a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting was a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting was a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting was a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
Text
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it
Sushil Kumar Vs State of UP and Ors.
BENCH-
Hon’ble Justice Siddhartha Varma
FACTS OF THE CASE-
After an election regarding the post of Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Kehlikhurd, Block Sidhpura, District Kasganj whose results were declared on 13.12.2015, the respondent no 3, Om Kar challenged the petition through Election Petition No. 1037 of 2016 as the petitioner won by one vote. The Court concluded from issue no 1 and 2 that recounting of ballot papers were essential. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order filed an instant writ petition after his Revision was dismissed on 29.11.2018. Paragraph 1 and 14 of the Election Petition shows that the petitioner was aggrieved by the presence of the three people namely Amar Pal Singh who was present at the counting table no. 7, 8 and 9 without any authority, Devendra Singh son of Constable in PAC and Ram Kumar was also present and influencing the counting process. The Learned Counsel also stated that nothing contained in paragraph nos. 13 and 14 indicated any fact which showed recounting was essential thus the petitioner submitted that the election should be declared bad on the basis of the presence of unauthorized individuals rather than recounting the ballot paper. On the basis of the judgment of Ran Adhar Singh Vs The District Judge, Ghazipur & Ors, the Learned Counsel submitted that without an adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support, no recounting process should take place.
ISSUE –
Was recounting was a legit solution?
JUDGMENT-
After hearing both the learned counsel the Court decided that recounting of the ballot papers is only possible if there is enough statement of material facts and evidence in support of the winning candidate getting ballot papers in his favor when the vote was not. Since the winning candidate won by a single vote, it cannot be considered to be a reason to order recounting of the ballot papers. The presence of unauthorized persons is not an adequate reason to recount the ballot papers. the Court said the reasons stated by the Respondent can be a ground for setting aside the election but not recount.
Judgment Link- http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do
The post Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it appeared first on Legal Desire.
Allahabad HC: Recounting could be done of the ballot papers only if election petition contains adequate statement of material facts and evidence in support of it published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes