#Financial fraud defense attorney

[legalfirmindia]

Unveiling Scam Issues: How to Find the Best Lawyers to Protect Yourself from Financial Frauds

In today’s digital age, scams and fraudulent activities have become increasingly prevalent. From fake charges to financial frauds, innocent individuals often find themselves trapped in legal battles that they did not see coming. It is essential to have a reliable legal team by your side to protect your interests and navigate through the complexities of the legal system. How to find the Best…

[ridenwithbiden]

On Friday, Kenneth Chesebro pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to file false documents in the Fulton County 2020 election conspiracy case, becoming the second high-level Donald Trump co-defendant to become a state’s witness in two days. Chesebro received an especially lenient sentence of five years’ probation, a small financial penalty, and 100 hours of community service.

With the guilty plea and cooperation deal Georgia prosecutors struck on Thursday with Team Trump attorney Sidney Powell, Chesebro’s plea deal should be viewed as an earthquake in the case against Trump. Given Powell’s close proximity to the former president and his legal advisers at crucial times in his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, her testimony will be particularly devastating not only as to defendant Trump, but to co-defendants Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman.

Chesebro’s testimony, meanwhile, implicates one of the key portions of the conspiracy both in Georgia and in the federal Jan. 6 case against Trump, specifically the efforts to create a slate of “false electors” to use during the Jan. 6 electoral count to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Now that both Chesebro and Powell are cooperating witnesses, the pressure on Giuliani and Eastman to plead and cooperate is exponentially higher.

That the significant cooperation under discussion involves four of Trump’s attorneys underscores the reality that the former president’s regularly touted defense that he was relying on the good-faith guidance of his attorneys during the attempted coup was, and is, nothing more than self-serving fantasy. In the courtroom—as compared with on television or in social media—he has never had the ability to offer that defense.

In court, the advice of counsel “affirmative defense” requires a defendant to prove two things: First, that he relied in good faith on his lawyer’s advice that the conduct in question at trial was legal, and second, that he made a full disclosure of all relevant facts to the attorney before receiving that advice.

Based on my four decades in the courtroom as both federal prosecutor and defense attorney, I can report that the assertion of the attorney-client privilege by a criminal defendant at trial is a black swan event—effective only with the consistent, overlapping trial testimony of both the attorney and the defendant, and the admission into evidence of any documents reflecting the communications or advice they testified about.

Putting aside the substantial evidence that Trump was warned by numerous White House lawyers that his efforts to overturn the 2020 election were in violation of the law, how does Trump establish the advice of counsel defense at trial?

As I have observed in prior articles, he is certainly not able to testify on his own behalf. There are surely no memos to the file, emails, or letters to the client evidencing such advice in writing. Finally in this regard, what lawyer is willing to testify he or she advised Trump it was, for example, lawful for him to ask the Georgia secretary of state to “find” enough votes for him to win that state?

Long before the Powell and Chesebro deals were announced, the absurdity of expecting any Trump attorney’s testimony to be anything but harmful to his cause was made crystal clear by Michael Cohen. More recently, when Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran was forced to testify against the former president based on the “crime fraud” exception to the attorney-client privilege, the testimony he gave and the internal memos he was compelled to produce, proved not to be shields for the former president, but swords to be wielded against him—as it is with Powell and Chesebro, and so it will be with others.

After all, what can you expect when your standard for choosing at least some of your lawyers is their willingness to turn a blind eye to whatever your weak ego and malicious intentions require?

In sum, while Georgia and DOJ attorneys have each received great potential benefits from the Powell and Chesebro deals, it was in no way structured to protect against a defense they know Trump cannot employ.

Finally, speaking of structure, the great deals Powell and Chesebro struck, getting probation while facing up to 20 years in jail on a RICO conviction, are certainly a blessing for them—they even get to finally tell the truth.

But District Attorney Fani Willis’ seeming generosity is a sign of shrewd judgment, not weakness.

Prosecutors have both the carrot and the stick to get what they want, and the two deals Willis just made were large carrots, signaling to the other defendants that she is someone they can deal with, and that there are potentially acceptable pathways out of the mess they are in. At the same time, she has just made her case against other, more significant defendants meaningfully stronger and her stick that much larger.

Of course, Willis is a long way from where she needs to be, but those who had originally feared she had overindicted the 19-defendant RICO case might now be a little less concerned and a little more impressed.

[leeeeeeef]

stil thinking about mia fey and dahlia hawthorne as foils in the different ways that they channel their past suffering.

mia was supposed to be the next head of the fey clan. dahlia was the heirress of a multimillion dollar jewelry company. in a way, both of them had their roads cut out for them the moment they were born. neither of them accepted these paths, however; mia pursued a career in law while dahlia, in much more violent fashion, faked her death and stole one of her father's most expensive diamonds. already, their motives are a pretty big indicator of how different they are; mia becomes a lawyer out of obligation towards her mother, while dahlia stages the kidnapping out of greed and resentment for her father.

another major difference is in how they treat their sisters. both mia and dahlia are separated from their sisters for extended periods of time. however, maya and mia are still very close; they tease each other and go for meals and its clear that they love each other very much. mia even relies on maya to hold onto evidence for her.

on the other hand, dahlia's treatment of iris is drastically different. i think the transcript speaks for itself:

mia leaves maya behind to live by herself. however, mia makes an effort to remain cordial with her no matter how long they are separated. dahlia leaves her sister behind so she could have more money to herself. and while dahlia drags iris along as an accomplice, iris often defies her, such as in the case of the staged kidnapping and when she falls in love with phoenix.

from the patterns we've established through their motives, its pretty safe to say that theres one huge difference: mia's love for others vs dahlia's selfishness. and ironically these two completely opposite things are rooted in the same thing: their mutual suffering at the hands of neglect and greed.

mia's goal of becoming an attorney is directly influenced by her mother's absence. she was only eleven when her mother was wrongfully accused of fraud, when misty fey abandoned her children and disappeared from the public eye. and at such a young age, mia had to be the sole guardian and provider of her one-year-old sister. it would be daunting for any child to be an orphan who basically had to raise her own sibling. and it's because of the allegations against mia's mother that she and her sister had to suffer so much.

when mia set out to convict redd white, she didn't have to become a defense attorney. (remember, godot could easily track down misty as a prosecutor! and a detective has more investigative authority to look into redd white's crimes) mia's entire job is to help the disadvantaged stand up to false accusations. in a way, she becomes the person who could have prevented her mother's disappearance. and she even plays a massive part in convicting the man responsible for it. she brings closure for herself and her sister, even beyond the grave, and she makes sure that no one else has to go through what her family had experienced for fifteen years.

likewise, dahlia's yearning for money and power comes from the neglect she faces from her parents. she openly condemns the people around her; her father only married into the family for financial gain, while her mother only cared about her and her sister for their spiritual power, of which they had none.

ironically, while dahlia criticizes her parents for being power-hungry and vengeful, she exhibits those same traits herself; she kills people for her own personal gain and attempts to murder maya out of revenge. what i think happened is that dahlia adopted these traits as a way to survive in a world where no one, not even her parents, would take her side. her kill-or-be-killed mindset protects her against people like her parents--and people like herself. and because dahlia makes no effort to stop this cycle of suffering that caused her so much grief, it continues to hurt iris, maya, mia, phoenix, diego, and so many others. mia seeks to protect others. dahlia seeks to protect herself.

it's said that you cant control what happens to you, but you can control how you react to it. and i think thats especially true here. its pretty clear to see that mia and dahlia's responses to their suffering is very different. and these responses ripple outward to others, for better or for worse. when mia finally triumphs over dahlia, she cuts short another cycle of suffering and she puts a stop to the pain of others by giving them the much needed closure that they deserve.

and thats pretty neat i think

[partisan-by-default]

A New York appellate court on Wednesday denied Donald Trump's attempt to freeze the judgment in his civil fraud case, a ruling that means, for now, that the former president is required to post a bond for hundreds of millions of dollars in the coming weeks.

Judge Anil Singh declined to address the amount of the bond, effectively requiring Trump by default to post a bond for the full judgment of $454 million.

Defense attorneys had said Trump was prepared to post a $100 million bond, arguing he had no way to secure a higher amount without selling off some of his real estate. A bond to cover the judgment in the case would have to be at least 120% of the total judgment -- more than $550 million, attorneys said.

"In the absence of a stay on the terms herein outlined, properties would likely need to be sold to raise capital under exigent circumstances, and there would be no way to recover any property sold following a successful appeal and no means to recover the resulting financial losses from the Attorney General," defense attorneys argued.

Judge Singh did agree to pause the enforcement of the part of the judgment that prohibited Trump and his sons from running their family business for the next several years. The ruling means the former president, Donald Trump Jr., and Eric Trump can remain in charge of the Trump Organization for the time being.

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

A jury in Manhattan has found former President Donald Trump's company guilty of a long-running criminal tax fraud scheme that lasted into his presidency.

Though Trump and his company have repeatedly faced criminal investigations, this case marks the first time his company has been charged, tried, and convicted on criminal charges.

Trump built his political brand, in large part, on his claim that he was an aggressive and successful businessman.

In all, the jury found two entities controlled by Trump guilty on 17 counts of criminal tax fraud and falsifying business records. The maximum penalty is $1.6 million.

Prosecutors had previously secured a guilty plea last summer from Trump's former longtime Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg, who became the star witness for the prosecution in the case.

But Weisselberg's co-defendants, two Trump business entities, remained under indictment.

On Halloween, prosecutors made their opening arguments in the trial of the Trump Corporation (which encompasses most of his business empire) and the Trump Payroll Corporation (which processes payments to staff), arguing that the case was about "greed and cheating."

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY SAID IN SUMMATION THAT TRUMP SANCTIONED TAX FRAUD

Trump Corporation attorney Susan Necheles told jurors in her opening statement that the trial is not a referendum on Trump, and asked them to keep an open mind.

Both sides emphasized that Trump was not a defendant, yet the former president's name came up frequently.

Some of the most attention-grabbing evidence presented to the jury were documents with Trump's signature: a rental agreement for a luxury apartment used by Weisselberg, a private school tuition check written for a grandchild of Weisselberg's. Weisselberg admitted he did not declare these benefits as income, as required by law.

In his summation, Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass pointed a rhetorical finger directly at Trump, saying Trump sanctioned tax fraud. The defense vigorously objected, and the objection was sustained by the judge.

During the course of the trial, outside the four walls of the courtroom, Trump declared he was running for president, and frequently lambasted Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on social media.

Weisselberg previously pleaded guilty to 15 felony tax charges. He admitted hiding the part of his salary that was paid through untaxed benefits like a luxury apartment, Mercedes-Benz leases for him and his wife, and private school tuition for his grandchildren.

The compensation was never reported to New York State or to the IRS.

As part of his plea deal, Weisselberg agreed to testify truthfully and to serve five months in jail.

During his testimony, which laid out the details of his criminal tax fraud, Weisselberg acknowledged that he still receives a $640,000 salary from the Trump Organization – though he has been placed on leave – and of hopes to receive an end-of year bonus.

At issue in this trial was whether Weisselberg and another top executive, Trump Organization Comptroller Jeffrey McConney acted "in behalf of" the corporate entities when they compensated Weisselberg and other top executives by paying for the apartments and luxury benefits that did not get reported to the tax authorities.

TRIAL UNFOLDED AT A MOMENT OF COMPLEX LEGAL PERIL FOR TRUMP AND HIS BUSINESS

In his instructions to jurors, before they reached a verdict, Judge Juan Merchan said that did not mean Trump's company benefited from the scheme, although there was evidence that it did.

Weisselberg acknowledged knowing taxes were owed on that compensation, but it was never reported.

Prosecutors argued that by compensating top executives in this fashion, the Trump Organization was able to save significant amounts of money.

This trial unfolded at a moment of complex legal peril for Trump and his business, with his attorneys playing defense in recent weeks in three different New York City courtrooms.

Last month, a judge required Trump's firm to submit to an outside monitor as part of an on-going $250 million civil case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

James' lawsuit claims Trump and his children fraudulently manipulated the value of its real estate holdings for more than a decade, deceiving lenders and and cheating tax authorities.

Trump and his attorneys have pushed back, arguing that prosecutors in New York have overstepped their authority and engaged in a a political witch hunt against the former President.

Trump also faces federal probes involving his role in efforts to block the peaceful transfer of power after he lost the 2020 presidential election and his decision to keep classified documents after leaving the White House.

Last month, the U.S. Justice Department appointed a special counsel to oversee those investigations. Trump has also described that process as politically motivated.

[follow-up-news]

Allen Weisselberg, the former chief financial officer of the Trump Organization, was sentenced Wednesday to five monthsin jail after pleading guilty to two counts of perjury last month in his testimony during former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial. The sentencing matched Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's recommendation. After Weisselberg's sentence was agreed upon by prosecutors and the defense, Judge Laurie Peterson asked him whether there was anything he would like to say. Weisselberg replied, "No, your honor," and the judge handed down the sentence. The hearing lasted only about two minutes. Weisselberg was accused of committing perjury in a deposition and during testimony in Trump’s trial, including allegedly lying when he said in July 2020 that he learned Trump’s triplex apartment had been overvalued from a Forbes report, but really knew about it well beforehand, Bragg’s office said. Weisselberg received a separate five-month sentence in a criminal case last year, serving only 100 days, after pleading guilty in 2022 to tax fraud charges in a 15-year scheme involving the Trump Organization’s business dealings. He agreed to pay nearly $2 million in taxes, interest and penalties for allegedly dodging tax payments on $1.7 million of his income with “off the books” benefits, including tuition for his grandkids, a luxury apartment and two Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Weisselberg was a witness and a co-defendant in the civil trial, in which Judge Arthur Engoron ruled in February that Trump, his company and current and former top executives including Weisselberghad to pay more than $350 million in damages and forbade the former president from running businesses in the state for three years — which ultimately became $464 million when pre-judgement interest was included.

[beardedmrbean]

Sam Bankman-Fried, once hailed as a genius in cryptocurrency, was found guilty Thursday of all fraud counts against him, a year after his exchange, FTX, imploded and practically wiped out thousands of customers.

The verdict was reached around 7:40 p.m. ET, about four hours after the federal jury in Manhattan began deliberations.

Bankman-Fried, a co-founder of the digital currency exchange FTX, was charged with seven counts of wire fraud, securities fraud and money laundering that swindled customers of FTX and lenders to its affiliated hedge fund, Alameda Research.

Bankman-Fried “perpetrated one of the biggest financial frauds in American history,” Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said after the verdict.

“The cryptocurrency industry might be new; the players like Bankman-Fried might be new,” Williams said. “But this kind of fraud, this kind of corruption, is as old as time.”

Bankman-Fried faces up to 110 years in prison. His sentencing is scheduled for March 28.

FTX and Alameda quickly collapsed in November 2022 after some of their financial liabilities were exposed. The fact that Alameda had taken billions of dollars from FTX's customers and that much of Alameda's balance sheet comprised digital currency assets it had created, was central to the case against Bankman-Fried.

Unnerved by disclosures about the firm's financial position, many of FTX’s customers tried to get their money back. That set off the equivalent of a bank run.

The value of Alameda's investments crashed, and FTX couldn’t return much of that money because it had been given to Alameda. Some went to the fund’s lenders, and billions were spent on sponsorships, commercials and loans to top executives. That, too, was a major part of the case against Bankman-Fried.

Many of FTX and Alameda's leaders were also charged after the firms went under. Former Alameda CEO Caroline Ellison, FTX co-founder Gary Wang and FTX head of engineering Nishad Singh all pleaded guilty. They agreed to cooperate with the prosecution and testify against Bankman-Fried in exchange for lighter sentences.

While Bankman-Fried testified in his own defense, it didn’t appear to have the same weight as the insider testimony against him. The prosecution, in its closing argument, said Bankman-Fried had answered “I can’t recall” 140 times while he was being cross-examined.

Bankman-Fried’s lawyers contended that he did not intend to defraud anyone and that the government was looking for someone to blame after the failures of FTX and Alameda.

Bankman-Fried was asked to rise and face the jury as the verdicts were read Thursday, and he did so. He showed little emotion as each verdict was read.

His father slumped in his seat, hunched over as each guilty verdict came in. His mother was visibly emotional.

Mark S. Cohen, Bankman-Fried’s counsel, said in an emailed statement Thursday that Bankman-Fried’s legal team respects the jury’s decision but that they are disappointed.

“Mr. Bankman Fried maintains his innocence and will continue to vigorously fight the charges against him,” he said.

Forbes had once estimated that Bankman-Fried's stakes in Alameda and FTXwere worth $26 billion. He was 29 at the time. But after the bankruptcies, that was gone. Criminal charges followed weeks later.

He also faces another trial on charges of bribing foreign officials and other counts. That trial is scheduled to begin in March, and he has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On Thursday, Bankman-Fried was found guilty of two counts of wire fraud conspiracy, two counts of wire fraud, one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering, one count of conspiracy to commit commodities fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud.

Williams, the prosecutor, said Bankman-Fried’s conviction should send a message to others.

“It’s a warning, this case, to every single fraudster out there who thinks that they’re untouchable or that their crimes are too complex for us to catch or that they’re too powerful for us to prosecute or that they could try to talk their way out of it when they get caught,” he said. “Those folks should think again.”

[foreverlogical]

Jeffrey McConney, former controller for the Trump Organization, is among the people who has testified in the bench trial for New York Attorney General Letitia James' civil fraud case against the company.

James alleges that former President Donald Trump and his company seriously exaggerated the value of its real estate assets — an allegation that Justice Arthur Engoron, assigned to the case, agreed with in a September 26 ruling. And McConney has offered testimony on the Trump Organization's operations.

Trump's legal team has claimed that McConney has insufficient knowledge where property valuations are concerned. But the Daily Beast's Jose Pagliery, in a report published on October 12, lays out some reasons why that claim is problematic.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to hold office again?

In court, Trump lawyer Jesus Suarez told Engoron, "Objection, your honor. Mr. McConney is not a valuation expert. He's not offered as a valuation expert."

But Pagliery explains, "The idea that the Trump Organization's long-time bean counter would be oblivious to the inner workings of real estate valuations seemed implausible, given that documents presented at trial showed that he was the key conduit to getting those very valuations compiled into Trump's annual statements of financial condition. That paperwork, which was signed off by outside accountants at the firm Mazars USA, was the reason that financial institutions like Deutsche Bank and Ladder Capital extended hundreds of millions of dollars in loans to Trump."

Pagliery continues, "Those funds allowed his company to seal several marquee deals, including the purchase of the Doral golf course in South Florida and the acquisition of the Old Post Office in Downtown Washington, which briefly became a Trump hotel. The inherently contradictory nature of Trump lawyers' stance on McConney underscored the sharp contrast on display at the ongoing bank fraud trial, where James is trying to bolster a case the judge has already decided has merit while Trump lawyers combat the very premise of the investigation. When investigators point to spreadsheets, the defense either shrugs, appears confused, or claims vastly inflated values are mere differences of opinion."

[shilpi2024sharma]

Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi

It is crucial to hire the Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi given the rapidly changing cyber threat scenario. Discover in-depth information about their success in addressing cybercrime matters, legal acumen, and areas of experience. Count on the finest to safeguard your online rights!

The challenges of cybercrime are growing along with the digital domain. Locating the best legal assistance in Delhi is essential. This post takes you into the realm of cyber law specialists, walking you through the subtleties and knowledge of Delhi's Top Cyber Crime Attorney.

Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi: Safeguarding Your Digital World

In an era where our lives are intertwined with the digital realm, the rise of cybercrime poses a significant threat. As technology evolves, so do the tactics of cybercriminals. Delhi, being a technology hub, requires the expertise of the Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi to navigate the complex legal landscape associated with cyber offenses.

Understanding Cyber Crimes

The Evolution of Cyber Threats

Cyber threats have evolved from simple hacking attempts to sophisticated cyber-attacks, including ransomware, phishing, and identity theft. Understanding these threats is the first step toward effective legal defense.

Impact on Individuals and Businesses

Cybercrimes not only jeopardize personal information but also pose a severe risk to businesses. The Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi must comprehend the far-reaching consequences of these offenses.

Necessity of Cyber Crime Legal Experts

The digital landscape demands specialized legal knowledge. A cyber crime lawyer is equipped to interpret complex technical aspects and ensure a robust legal defense.

Qualities of the Best Cyber Crime Lawyer

Technological Acumen

The legal expert must possess a deep understanding of evolving technologies to effectively counter cyber threats. Continuous learning and adaptation are key in this dynamic field.

Analytical Skills

Analyzing digital evidence requires sharp analytical skills. The Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi excels in dissecting complex data to build a compelling case.

Our Expertise are in: -

· Fraud and financial crimes

· Cyber terrorism

· Cyberextortion

· Cyberwarfare

· Computer as a target

· Computer as a tool

· Obscene or offensive content

· Harassment

· Drug trafficking

Our Case Processing in India: -

· Supreme Court of India

· Delhi High Court

· All District Courts

Experience in Cyber Forensics

Cyber forensics is the backbone of cybercrime investigations. A seasoned lawyer employs forensic techniques to trace digital footprints and gather admissible evidence.

Legal Framework in Delhi

Cyber Laws in India

A strong foundation in Indian cyber laws is essential. The lawyer should be well-versed in acts like the Information Technology Act, providing the legal framework for cyber-related offenses.

Relevance in the Digital Age

As our lives become more digital, cyber laws gain prominence. The Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi understands the relevance of these laws in the contemporary context.

Noteworthy Cyber Crime Cases in Delhi

Highlighting past cases showcases the lawyer's experience and success in navigating the legal complexities associated with cybercrimes.

How to Choose the Right Lawyer

Assessing Specializations

Not all lawyers are equipped to handle cybercrime cases. Evaluating the lawyer's specialization ensures that they possess the specific skills required.

Checking Track Record

A proven track record in successfully handling cybercrime cases instills confidence. Past successes are indicative of the lawyer's competence.

Initial Consultation Tips

An initial consultation provides insight into the lawyer's approach. Look for effective communication, transparency, and a client-centric attitude.

Role of Cyber Crime Lawyers in Investigations

Collaboration with Law Enforcement

Cyber crime lawyers often collaborate with law enforcement agencies. This partnership is vital for gathering information and building a strong case.

Gathering Digital Evidence

Adept at digital forensics, these lawyers can extract and analyze digital evidence crucial for establishing guilt or innocence.

Courtroom Strategies

Presenting a case in court requires strategic acumen. The Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi employs effective courtroom strategies to ensure a favorable outcome.

Success Stories: Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi

Notable Cases Handled

Highlighting specific cases provides a glimpse into the lawyer's achievements and capabilities in handling diverse cybercrime scenarios.

Positive Case Outcomes

Successful resolutions and positive case outcomes demonstrate the lawyer's prowess in securing justice for their clients.

Client Testimonials

First-hand accounts from satisfied clients serve as a testament to the lawyer's commitment and effectiveness in handling cybercrime cases.

Challenges Faced by Cyber Crime Lawyers

Rapidly Changing Cyber Landscape

Adapting to the swiftly evolving cyber landscape poses a constant challenge. The best lawyers stay ahead by staying informed and updated.

Legal Loopholes and Ambiguities

Cyber laws may have loopholes or ambiguities that cyber crime lawyers must navigate skillfully. This requires a nuanced understanding of legal intricacies.

Balancing Privacy Concerns

The lawyer must strike a delicate balance between upholding privacy rights and pursuing justice, especially in cases involving sensitive information.

Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi

Overview of Services Offered

The Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi provides a comprehensive array of legal services, from case consultations to representation in court.

Client-Centric Approach

Prioritizing client needs ensures a supportive and collaborative legal process, fostering trust and confidence.

Commitment to Legal Excellence

A commitment to legal excellence is non-negotiable. The best lawyers consistently deliver high-quality legal services.

Cyber Crime Prevention Tips

Strengthening Digital Security

Providing practical tips on enhancing digital security empowers individuals and businesses to proactively protect themselves.

Educating Employees and Individuals

Awareness is the first line of defense. The article emphasizes the importance of educating individuals and employees on cybersecurity best practices.

Proactive Measures

Encouraging proactive measures ensures that readers actively engage in securing their digital presence, preventing potential cyber threats.

Collaboration with IT Experts

Importance of Technical Consultation

Collaborating with IT experts enhances the lawyer's ability to comprehend intricate technical details, strengthening the overall legal strategy.

Building Strong Legal-Technical Partnerships

A synergistic partnership between legal and technical experts ensures a holistic approach to cybercrime defense.

Key Benefits for Clients

Highlighting the benefits of collaboration assures clients that they are receiving comprehensive and effective legal support.

Industry Recognition and Awards

Acknowledgments and Accolades

Recognition from the industry and awards signal the lawyer's standing as a reputable and accomplished professional in cyber law.

Contributions to Cyber Law Development

Active contributions to the development of cyber laws showcase the lawyer's commitment to shaping a robust legal framework.

Impact on Legal Community

Positive influence within the legal community underlines the lawyer's role in fostering growth and knowledge exchange.

Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi Perspective

Insights on Cyber Crime Trends

Sharing insights on emerging cyber crime trends demonstrates the lawyer's proactive approach to staying ahead of the curve.

Future Challenges and Preparedness

Discussing future challenges and preparedness indicates the lawyer's foresight and commitment to staying relevant in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Vision for a Secure Digital Future

A lawyer with a vision for a secure digital future inspires confidence in clients and the community at large.

FAQs: Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi

Legal Fees and Consultation Charges

Legal fees vary, usually based on the complexity of the case. Consultation charges may be nominal or part of the overall legal fees.

Average Duration of Cyber Crime Cases

The duration varies, depending on the complexity of the case. Some cases may be resolved swiftly, while others may take an extended period.

Confidentiality Measures

Maintaining client confidentiality is paramount. The best cyber crime lawyers implement robust measures to safeguard client information.

Cross-Border Legal Challenges

Handling cases with international implications may pose challenges, requiring the lawyer to navigate complex legal jurisdictions.

Handling Emerging Cyber Threats

Top lawyers stay informed about emerging threats, allowing them to adapt their legal strategies to counter evolving cybercriminal tactics.

Recent Legislative Changes Impacting Cyber Law

Cyber laws evolve, and lawyers must stay updated on recent legislative changes to provide effective legal counsel.

In conclusion, the Best Cyber Crime Lawyer in Delhi plays a pivotal role in safeguarding individuals and businesses from the growing threat of cybercrime. By understanding the nuances of cyber laws, possessing technical acumen, and embracing a client-centric approach, these legal experts stand as pillars of defense in the digital world.

Read More: www.bestcybercrimelawyer.in

[longwindedbore]

When i’ve bought or sold a home the mortgage companies have always looked at three documents:

A. The appraisal,

B. The seller’s disclosure statement,

C. The buyer’s statement of financial condition

Any factual misstatements or material omissions on B or C can result in a conviction for fraud for the signee(s)

https://www.federalcriminaldefenseadvocates.com/mortgage-fraud

[From the Article]

Some common types of mortgage fraud are: [I’ve added the numbering]

Intentionally providing false financial statements;

lying about income (income fraud);

providing false tax returns;

overvaluing a property's value (appraisal fraud);

providing fake employment verification;

manipulated credit scores/reports;

stating that the property acquired is for residential purposes but in actuality is for investment purposes which gives lower interest rates (occupancy fraud)…

In United States federal courts, mortgage fraud is prosecuted as wire fraud, real estate fraud, bank fraud, mail fraud and money laundering, and you may face a maximum of 30 years in prison and up to a $1 million fine.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Donald Trump, his sons, his companies and other of his executives have been found liable for fraud in the on going civil trial.

Just as you or I would be if we did ANY of the above.

The State had demonstrated that the Trump Organization committed repeatedly 1, 2, 4, 6, 7 plus others not listed above

Judge Engoron’s ruling on the State’s Motion for Summary Judgment noted that the State compared documents in the Trump Organizations records which at odds with the Statements of Financial Conditions subpoenaed from banks which had provided Trump loans.

Donald Trump’s attorneys filed three motions against the State; were rejected three times by the Judge; then appealed three times and were rejected three times.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Lead attorney Kise has argued before the US Supreme Court and won his cases

If he had any any any other legal arguments howler specious or nebulous for an appeals court he would have made that appeal before the train wreck of testimony by Trump and Sons.

Undoubtedly Trump, who considered himself smarter than the Judge, opposing counsel, and his own $3million retainer attorney, paid close to ZERO attention to Kise’s attempt to prep him as a witness.

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

House Republicans pass Israel funding bill.

          Against that fluid backdrop, House Republicans passed a non-serious supplemental funding bill that ties support for Israel to a proportionate reduction in funding for the IRS. See Talking Points Memo, House Passes Dead-On-Arrival, Poison-Pilled Israel Aid Bill.

          Speaker Mike Johnson mocked a Congressional Budget Office report that said the $14 billion cut to the IRS budget (over ten years) would reduce revenue by $49 billion and increase the deficit by $24 billion.

          Mike Johnson pretended to be confused by the CBO’s math, saying

Only in Washington when you cut spending do they call it an increase in the deficit.

          Speaker Johnson’s limited understanding of math may be explained by the fact that his financial disclosures for the last seven years have failed to list a checking account. So, to put the CBO’s analysis in simple terms for Johnson, the IRS’s annual budget is $14 billion and it collects $4.9 trillion in revenue each year. If Republicans “cut spending” by eliminating the IRS’s entire annual budget, that “cut” would increase the deficit by $4.9 trillion. See how easy that is?

          But Speaker Johnson does not appear to be interested in facts—or truth. He just hired as his press spokesperson Raj Shah, who served as the Fox “brand protection” expert during the period that Fox News anchors were spreading falsehoods about alleged widespread fraud in the 2020 election. See The Daily Beast, Speaker Mike Johnson Hires Raj Shah, the Perfect Flack to Push More Election Lies.

          Emails show that Shah was internally questioning (or mocking) the positions taken by Fox anchors and guests while simultaneously defending and promoting those anchors. Shah was terminated by Fox in the aftermath of its $787 million defamation loss to Dominion Voting Systems.

          Hiring a press spokesperson who defended Fox against the Big Lie is an inauspicious start for a Speaker best known for taking the lead on a brief in the Supreme Court arguing to overturn the 2020 election.

Why the flare-up in Trump's civil trial matters.

          Trump's lawyers and Judge Engoron got into an argument during the trial on Thursday. The argument matters because it shows that Trump has hired lawyers who are unsuitable for defending him in the upcoming federal trial on election interference.

          During trial proceedings on Thursday, Trump's attorney, Christopher Kise objected to questioning of Eric Trump. After making his objection, Kise said snidely to Judge Engoron, “Maybe you should ask your law clerk first [before ruling on the objection].” See Business Insider, Angry NY Fraud-Trial Judge Accuses Trump Lawyer of Misogyny in Court.

          There was more back and forth, including an accusation by Judge Engoron that Kise’s comment was motivated by misogyny.

          No lawyer—or rather, no good lawyer—would ever attack a judge by suggesting that the judge is inappropriately relying on their law clerk. No good lawyer would ever attack a judge in open court by suggesting that the judge is not competent to preside over the proceedings.

          Before Kise began working for Trump, Kise had a decent reputation. He was a partner in a respected national law firm. He served as the Solicitor General of Florida. But his association with Trump has apparently caused him to adopt Trump's rude, abusive, offensive behavior.

          Kise’s disrespect to Judge Engoron may be what Kise thinks Trump wants (or needs), but it will not go well in federal court before Judge Chutkan. The misconduct of an attorney should not prejudice their client’s defense, but if Kise continues such behavior, it is difficult to see how he will not undermine Trump's already weak defense in the election interference case.

Nancy Pelosi takes on “No Labels.”

          “No Labels” is a stalking horse for Donald Trump. It seeks to run a hopeless third-party bid that will siphon votes from Joe Biden, forcing a “contingent election” in the House that will elect Donald Trump. No Labels is not a political party and, therefore, is not required by law to disclose donors—like all other political parties. But what little is known about its backers is that it is sponsored by Republican megadonors. See Mother Jones, No Labels Exposed: Here’s a List of Donors Funding Its Effort To Disrupt the 2024 Race.

          DO NOT FALL FOR the No Labels lies about wanting a “unity ticket.” It seeks to elect Donald Trump. Period. Full stop.

          Nancy Pelosi has recently come out against No Labels in a big way. See Politico, Pelosi launches an all-out attack against No Labels. Per Politico, Pelosi said,

[No Labels is perilous to our democracy. I hesitate to [call them] “No Labels” because they do have labels. They’re called no taxes for the rich. No child tax credit for children. They’re called let’s undo the Affordable Care Act. When they jeopardize the reelection of Joe Biden as president of the United States, I can no longer remain silent. No Labels is perilous to our democracy. I hesitate to [call them] “No Labels” because they do have labels. They’re called no taxes for the rich. No child tax credit for children. They’re called let’s undo the Affordable Care Act. When they jeopardize the reelection of Joe Biden as president of the United States, I can no longer remain silent.

[Robert B. Hubbell Newsletter]

[kirlewlawfirm]

Steps to Take if Accused of PPP Loan Fraud in Miami

If you are under investigation or accused of PPP loan fraud, the first thing you should do is not make a statement or contact any of your former business associates. These initial moments of panic when a person finds out they are under investigation usually lead to the authorities obtaining the most damning evidence against the accused.

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), created to help businesses survive during the pandemic, is now the source of most fraud cases in federal court. Misunderstandings and mismanagement of funds have brought many under legal scrutiny. If you are one of those businesses, here is what you must do.

Immediate Steps to Take

Remain as calm as you can. We know the times may be challenging, but anything you say or do can be used against you and weaken your case. If you have anything to say or any papers to present, get a white-collar criminal lawyer in Miami, FL, for the best legal representation. Gather all documents and evidence related to your loan and navigate the intricacies of your case with an experienced attorney.

Building a Strong Defense

Next is building your defense, which will decide the course of action. PPP loan fraud charges can vary in nature, so it is essential to understand these allegations thoroughly. Your lawyers and their team will also evaluate the specifics of the case and all evidence against you, pinpointing any discrepancies to formulate potential defenses. They will also help you explore alternative legal options, such as negotiating a plea deal or moving to dismiss the indictment. You may also have to prepare for a trial if needed. Remember, each case is unique, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach.

Preparing For the Legal Consequences

Once you and your lawyer have completed the foundational work, it is time to move ahead. Make sure you meet all deadlines and cooperate with the legal team, as doing so can positively impact your case. It also shows your willingness to resolve the matter ASAP. Also, be in constant touch with your attorney so everyone is informed throughout the case timeline. It prepares you for scenarios like interviews, financial penalties, imprisonment, restitution, or asset forfeiture. Having a competent attorney by your side, creating a proper defense, and having clarity with your plan helps you and your lawyer make informed decisions and achieve the best possible outcomes for the case. In federal court, cases move fast. There are serious ramifications for being indicted by a grand jury. So you have to be prepared and act quickly.

Bonus Tips

You can take additional measures to remain prepared for whatever is to come. Review all your business practices and financial records to prevent future issues. Educate your business team to avoid inadvertent errors and strengthen your defense. You can also connect with anyone in the industry who has faced a similar scenario for more insights. Also, stay up-to-date on any changes in PPP loan regulations so you can effectively revise your defense strategies. These steps can help you overcome legal challenges with confidence and success.

The Bottom Line

PPP loan fraud accusation is serious. It can disrupt your daily life, tarnish your reputation, and cause financial constraints. But with expert legal guidance, you won’t have to navigate this alone. Get expert guidance from Brian Kirlew, Esq. and contact The Kirlew Law Firm at 305-521-0484 or visit us online to secure your future and preserve your rights.

[medlinlaw]

Criminal Law: An Overview Of Fraud Charges In Dallas, Texas

Criminal law is a complex and ever-evolving field that encompasses many offenses, including fraud charges. Fraud charges can have consequences for those accused, resulting in fines, jail time, and damage to one's reputation. 

As such, it's crucial to understand the different types of fraud and their penalties under Texas law. This article will have an overview of fraud charges in Dallas. It will also discuss why finding a criminal lawyer is essential if facing these allegations.  

Different Types Of Fraud

Numerous kinds of fraud are defined by U.S. criminal law. Lists can be found below.

Credit card fraud is one of the common forms in Dallas. It is a type of fraud that occurs when someone uses another person's credit or debit card without permission. It can also happen when someone creates a fake account or steals personal information to make unauthorized purchases.

Another form of fraudulent financial activity is insurance fraud. Insurance companies seek people who try to scam them by making false claims. Individuals who commit this type of crime in Dallas could face criminal and civil penalties.

Investment scams are another popular form of fraudulent financial activity in Dallas. These schemes involve convincing people to invest money into something that doesn't exist or isn't legitimate. These investments are often Pyramid scams that pay early investors fresh investor money until they collapse.

Fraud can be committed in various ways in Dallas. The offender will face significant penalties and lengthy jail sentences under Texas law if caught. Learn more about fines.

Penalties For Fraud

The fraud penalties depend on the type of fraud committed and the value of the property or money involved.

Credit card fraud under $50 carries a six-month prison sentence and a $2,000 fine. However, If someone commits fraud above $200,000, they could be imprisoned for 99 years and fined $10,000.

Aside from imprisonment and fines, fraudsters are required to pay restitution or compensation for any damages.

It's vital to note that even attempting or conspiring with others to commit fraud can result in criminal charges and penalties. Therefore, it's crucial to seek an experienced criminal lawyer who focuses on defending against these types of charges.

Find A Criminal Lawyer In Dallas, Texas

If you're facing fraud charges in Dallas, Texas, seeking legal representation is crucial. Fraud cases can be complicated and require an experienced criminal lawyer who understands the nuances of criminal law.

When looking for a criminal lawyer for your case, choose someone with extensive experience handling similar cases. Find a defense lawyer who has successfully defended clients and knows federal and state fraud laws.

It's also essential to work with a responsive lawyer who keeps you informed throughout the entire legal process. Your attorney should explain all the available options and help you make informed decisions about handling your case.

Contact an experienced criminal lawyer at The Medlin Law Firm if you face fraud accusations in Dallas, Texas. With proper legal representation, you can protect your rights and avoid severe penalties associated with these types of crimes. See more details at MedlinFirm.com

Summary

Fraud is a broad term that covers many types of illegal activities, such as credit card fraud, insurance fraud, and investment scams. The offender will face significant penalties and lengthy jail sentences under Texas law if caught. Penalties for fraud depend on the type of fraud committed and the value of the property or money involved. Fraud charges in Dallas, Texas, can result in imprisonment, fines, restitution, or compensation for damages. 

Contact The Medlin Law Firm if you are facing fraud accusations in Dallas, Texas. You can protect your rights and avoid severe penalties with suitable legal representation.

More information The Medlin Law Firm in iGlobal Driving directions

The Medlin Law Firm 2550 Pacific Ave #866 Dallas, TX 75226 (214) 888-4810

[canserves]

Criminal Defense Lawyer in Houston TX

Criminal defense lawyers play a crucial role in the justice system, ensuring that the accused receive a fair trial and their rights are protected. They provide legal representation to those charged with crimes, navigating the complexities of the legal system on their behalf.

Relevance in Houston, TX

Houston, TX, with its diverse and populous nature, sees a wide range of criminal cases. Having a competent criminal defense lawyer in Houston is essential due to the unique legal landscape and the seriousness of the penalties involved.

Understanding Criminal Defense Law

Definition and Scope

Criminal defense law involves representing individuals accused of crimes, ensuring their legal rights are protected throughout the judicial process. This branch of law covers a wide array of offenses, from minor infractions to serious felonies.

Key Principles

The key principles of criminal defense law include the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, and the right to legal representation. These principles form the foundation of a just and equitable legal system.

Types of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Public Defenders

Public defenders are appointed by the court to represent defendants who cannot afford private attorneys. They are typically employed by the government and handle a high volume of cases.

Private Attorneys

Private attorneys are hired directly by defendants. They often have more resources and can dedicate more time to each case compared to public defenders.

Panel Attorneys

Panel attorneys are private lawyers who take on cases assigned by the court when the public defender's office has a conflict of interest or is overloaded with cases.

Common Criminal Charges in Houston

Drug Offenses

Drug offenses in Houston range from possession to trafficking and can carry severe penalties, including long prison sentences and hefty fines.

DUI/DWI

Driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI) are serious offenses in Houston. Convictions can result in license suspension, fines, and even jail time.

Assault and Battery

Assault and battery charges can stem from physical altercations. These charges can vary from misdemeanors to felonies, depending on the severity of the incident.

Theft and Burglary

Theft and burglary charges involve unlawfully taking someone else's property. Penalties vary based on the value of the stolen property and the circumstances of the crime.

White Collar Crimes

White collar crimes, such as fraud and embezzlement, are non-violent offenses typically committed for financial gain. These crimes can have severe legal and financial consequences.

Roles and Responsibilities of a Criminal Defense Lawyer in Houston

Pre-Trial Duties

Before the trial, a criminal defense lawyer investigates the case, gathers evidence, and prepares a defense strategy. They also negotiate with prosecutors to potentially reduce charges or dismiss the case.

Trial Duties

During the trial, the defense lawyer presents evidence, cross-examines witnesses, and makes arguments to support their client's innocence or mitigate their culpability.

Post-Trial Duties

After the trial, the lawyer may handle appeals, file motions for a new trial, or negotiate reduced sentences if the defendant is convicted.

Qualities of a Good Criminal Defense Lawyer

Experience and Expertise

A good criminal defense lawyer should have extensive experience and expertise in handling criminal cases. This includes a deep understanding of criminal law and procedure.

Communication Skills

Effective communication skills are essential for negotiating with prosecutors, presenting arguments in court, and explaining legal options to clients.

Analytical Skills

A strong analytical ability is crucial for assessing evidence, identifying legal issues, and developing defense strategies.

Negotiation Skills

Negotiation skills are vital for plea bargaining with prosecutors to reduce charges or secure lighter sentences for clients.

How to Choose the Right Criminal Defense Lawyer

Research and Referrals

Start by researching potential lawyers and seeking referrals from trusted sources. Look for lawyers with positive reviews and a track record of success in criminal defense.

Initial Consultation

Schedule an initial consultation to discuss your case and assess the lawyer's expertise, communication style, and compatibility with your needs.

Questions to Ask

During the consultation, ask about the lawyer's experience with similar cases, their approach to defense, and their fee structure to ensure they are the right fit for your case.

Costs and Fees

Factors Affecting Cost

The cost of hiring a criminal defense lawyer can vary based on factors such as the complexity of the case, the lawyer's experience, and the duration of the trial.

Average Cost in Houston

In Houston, the cost of a criminal defense lawyer can range from $150 to $700 per hour, with total fees potentially reaching several thousand dollars.

Payment Plans and Pro Bono Services

Some lawyers offer payment plans to make their services more affordable. Additionally, there are pro bono services available for those who cannot afford legal representation.

The Legal Process in Criminal Cases

Arrest and Charges

The legal process begins with the arrest and formal charges against the defendant. The police gather evidence and present it to the prosecutor, who decides whether to file charges.

Arraignment

During the arraignment, the defendant is formally charged and enters a plea. This stage involves setting bail and scheduling future court dates.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions involve requests made by the defense or prosecution to shape the trial. These can include motions to suppress evidence or dismiss charges.

Trial

The trial is the main event where both sides present their cases to a judge or jury. The defense aims to create reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt.

Sentencing

If the defendant is convicted, the judge imposes a sentence based on the severity of the crime and other factors such as prior criminal history.

Appeals

The defense can appeal a conviction if there are grounds to believe there were legal errors during the trial that affected the outcome.

Defenses in Criminal Cases

Alibi

An alibi defense involves providing evidence that the defendant was elsewhere when the crime occurred, making it impossible for them to have committed the offense.

Self-Defense

Self-defense claims that the defendant acted to protect themselves or others from imminent harm, justifying their actions.

Insanity Defense

The insanity defense argues that the defendant was not in a sound mental state at the time of the crime and therefore should not be held responsible.

Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement induces a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. This defense can be used if the defendant was coerced or tricked into committing the offense.

Case Studies

Successful Defense Strategies

Examining successful defense strategies provides insights into how skilled lawyers navigate the complexities of criminal cases to achieve favorable outcomes.

Notable Cases in Houston

Notable cases in Houston highlight the city's unique legal challenges and the impact of effective criminal defense.

Expert Insights

Quotes from Renowned Criminal Defense Lawyers

Quotes from experienced criminal defense lawyers offer valuable perspectives on the legal process and defense strategies.

Advice from Legal Experts

Legal experts provide advice on navigating the criminal justice system and securing the best possible outcome for defendants.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What to Do If Arrested?

If arrested, it is crucial to remain calm, exercise the right to remain silent, and request an attorney immediately.

How to Get Bail?

Bail can be obtained by paying the set amount or using a bail bondsman. The defense lawyer can also request a bail reduction hearing.

What Happens After Arraignment?

After arraignment, the case proceeds to pre-trial motions, plea negotiations, and potentially a trial if no settlement is reached.

How Long Does a Criminal Case Take?

The duration of a criminal case varies based on its complexity, ranging from a few months to several years.

Conclusion

Summary of Key Points

Hiring a Criminal Defense Lawyer Houston in Taxas  is crucial for navigating the legal system and ensuring the best possible defense. Key points include understanding the legal process, knowing what to expect from a lawyer, and exploring defense strategies.

Call to Action for Legal Consultation

If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges, consult with a reputable Criminal Defense Lawyer in Houston in TX to protect your rights and achieve a fair outcome.

[influencermagazineuk]

Lawyers for UK Tech Founder Mike Lynch Seek Acquittal in US Fraud Trial

The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons Mike Lynch's defense team on Monday portrayed the British tech pioneer as a savvy entrepreneur while prosecutors in a San Francisco court painted him as a greedy fraudster. The jury will soon deliberate on allegations that Lynch defrauded Hewlett-Packard (HP) in its $11 billion acquisition of his software company, Autonomy. The 2011 deal was one of the most significant in British tech history but quickly turned sour. HP wrote down Autonomy's value by $8.8 billion within a year of the acquisition. Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Leach, in his closing arguments, urged jurors to find no reasonable doubt of fraud at Autonomy, asserting that Lynch orchestrated the scheme. Leach highlighted the financial gains Lynch made from the deal, stating, "Dr. Lynch had 500 million reasons to defraud HP. It tells you volumes about who was in charge and who benefited from this." Lynch, along with former Autonomy finance executive Stephen Chamberlain, faces charges of fraud and conspiracy, accused of inflating the company's revenue starting in 2009 to make it more attractive to buyers. Lynch, a Cambridge University-educated entrepreneur, took the stand in his defense, denying any wrongdoing and blaming HP for mishandling the integration of the two companies. Lynch's attorney, Brian Heberlig, argued that Lynch's testimony undermined the prosecution's case, stating, "It was more than reasonable doubt. It was truth," while displaying a large photo of Lynch with descriptors such as "smart" and "focused on the future." The defense team secured a minor victory last week when U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer dismissed one count of securities fraud due to insufficient evidence. However, Lynch still faces one count of conspiracy and 14 counts of wire fraud. Prosecutors allege that Lynch and Chamberlain manipulated Autonomy's finances through back-dated agreements and "round-trip" deals that involved fake contracts to inflate revenue. The trial, which began in mid-March, has included testimony from over 30 government witnesses, including former HP CEO Leo Apotheker, who was fired shortly after the Autonomy deal was announced. Lynch's lawyers contend that HP was so eager to acquire Autonomy to outpace competitors that it rushed the due diligence process. On the stand, Lynch claimed his focus was on technological issues and that he entrusted financial matters to Sushovan Hussain, Autonomy's then-chief financial officer. Hussain was separately convicted in 2018 of conspiracy, wire fraud, and securities fraud related to the HP deal and was released from U.S. prison in January after serving a five-year sentence. Lynch, once one of the UK's leading tech entrepreneurs, has been compared to Apple's Steve Jobs and Microsoft's Bill Gates. The acquisition of Autonomy was intended to bolster HP's software business but instead led to prolonged and costly legal disputes. HP largely won a civil lawsuit against Lynch and Hussain in London in 2022, although damages are yet to be determined, with the company seeking $4 billion. Closing arguments in the trial are expected to conclude on Tuesday, after which the jury will begin deliberations. The Royal Society, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0, via Wikimedia Commons Read the full article

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

The FBI on Thursday arrested a businessman at the center of the scandal that led to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s historic impeachment, a move that came amid new questions about the men’s dealings raised by financial records the Republican’s lawyers made public to try to clear him of bribery allegations.

Nate Paul, 36, was taken into custody by federal agents and booked into an Austin jail in the afternoon, according to Travis County Sheriff’s Office records. It was not immediately clear what charges led to his arrest, but the records showed he was being held on a federal detainer for a felony.

Paul’s arrest followed a yearslong federal investigation into the Austin real estate developer — a probe that Paxton involved his office in, setting off a chain of events that ultimately led to his impeachment last month.

Lawyers for Paul did not immediately respond to requests for comment. One of Paxton’s defense attorneys, Dan Cogdell, said he had no additional information on the arrest. The FBI declined to comment, and a spokesman for federal prosecutors in West Texas did not respond to inquiries.

FBI agents examining Paul’s troubled real estate empire searched his Austin offices and palatial home in 2019. The next year, eight of Paxton’s top deputies reported the attorney general to the FBI on allegations of bribery and abusing his office to help Paul, including by hiring an outside lawyer to examine the developer’s claims of wrongdoing by federal agents.

The allegations by Paxton’s staff prompted an FBI investigation, which remains ongoing, and are central to articles of impeachment overwhelmingly approved by the GOP-led state House of Representatives.

On Wednesday, Paxton’s defense team showed a packed room of journalists a bank statement that included a 2020 wire transfer purportedly showing him, and not a donor, paying more than $120,000 for a home renovation.

The wire transfer was dated Oct. 1, 2020 — the same day Paxton’s deputies signed a letter informing the head of human resources at the Texas attorney general’s office that they had reported Paxton to the FBI.

The $121,000 payment was to Cupertino Builders, whose manager was an associate of Paul, state corporation and court records show.

The company did not incorporate as a business in Texas until more than three weeks after the transaction took place. A company of the same name was formed in Delaware in April of that year, although public filings there do not make clear who is behind it.

Last year a court-appointed overseer for some of Paul’s companies wrote in a report that Cupertino Builders was used for “fraudulent transfers” from his business to Narsimha Raju Sagiraju, who was convicted of fraud in California in 2016. The report described Sagiraju as Paul’s “friend.”

Paul, who also employed a woman with whom Paxton acknowledged having an extramarital affair, has denied bribing Paxton. In a deposition, Paul described Sagiraju as an “independent contractor” and said he didn’t remember how they first met.

The timing of the payment — and the identity of who was paid for renovations at Paxton’s home in Austin — was not publicly known before his new legal team held a news conference Wednesday in which they put financial documents on a projector screen while criticizing the impeachment. They were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

Tony Buzbee, a prominent Houston attorney who was hired by Paxton over the weekend and led the news conference, said by email Thursday that receipts “clearly demonstrate” Paxton paid for the repairs. He did not address questions about the timing of the payments or Cupertino Builders.

“Without any evidence the politicians leading this sham impeachment falsely accused General Paxton of not paying for the repairs to his home. That is a lie,” Buzbee said.

Since becoming just the third sitting official in Texas history to be impeached, Paxton has attacked the proceedings as politically motivated and rushed, saying he was never given the chance to rebut the accusations in the state House.

“We have the receipts,” Buzbee told reporters Wednesday as the documents flashed onscreen. “This is the type of evidence we tried to offer them once we found out this foolishness was going on.”

Paxton is temporarily suspended from office pending the outcome of a trial in the Texas Senate that is set to begin no later than Aug. 28. The jury will be the members of the 31-seat Senate; one of them, Paxton’s wife, Sen. Angela Paxton, has not said whether she will recuse herself.

The Paxtons purchased the Austin house in 2018. When it was remodeled two years later, Paxton’s former staff alleged in court documents, Paul “was involved in” the work.

Among the 20 articles of impeachment are accusations that Paxton used the power of his office to help Paul over unproven claims of an elaborate conspiracy to steal $200 million of the developer’s properties. The FBI searched Paul’s home in 2019, but he has not been charged and his attorneys have denied wrongdoing.

The city has no record of building permits from the time of the renovations. A different Austin contractor — not Cupertino Builders — received a federal grand jury subpoena in 2021 for records related to work on Paxton’s home that started in January 2020.

Cupertino Builders was formed in October 2020 and dissolved less than two years later, according to Texas corporation records. Its manager was Sagiraju, who said in a deposition for an unrelated case that he did “consulting” work for Paul’s business and had an email address with Paul’s company.

Sagiraju acknowledged that he served prison time for securities fraud and grand theft in California before moving to Austin, according to a transcript of the deposition. He said he was first introduced to Paul by a mutual friend before his prison term and they later did “a few projects” together.

A lawyer for Sagiraju did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Paxton was separately indicted on securities fraud charges in 2015, though he has yet to stand trial.