#Employement laws
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
#employment#labor laws#exit strategy#Japan#France#HR#workplace#banishment room#resignation#oidashibeya#jobs
108 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm rewatching all the Marvel Defenders shows on Netflix and as much as I mock the MCU now, I need non-Marvel fans to understand that I was and still am a fan of "Daredevil fighting the gentrifying assshole who bought out the police force because ACAB both as a lawyer and vigilante of the community" and "Jessica Jones fighting the man who mind controlled her into doing unspeakable things and forming a community of fellow survivors and allies while dealing with PTSD in a range of both healthy and unhealthy ways" Marvel. God I love these idiots they carried so hard
#vio.txt#mcu#marvel#jessica jones#daredevil#also the two of them induced so much bi panic in me. also gender envy. jessica jones is one of the few women i get gender envy fron#the iron fist and luke cage shows were...more mid but still leagues above current marvel shows#like. yes be anti-mcu but these were masterpieces#and yes this is why i was so pissed about them putting daredevil in she hulk and trying to make him iron man 2.0#like! yes hes suave and charming but thats bc its his lawyer job!! he works in a law firm he and his friends started to serve his community#he is NOT 'i am rich and better than u' charming. he is 'i learned how to talk fancy for my degree and i have empathy' charming#and not bringing the other guys over either???? bruhhh#marvel really cancelled the best things they did on the screen#matt murdock my original red and black round glasses wearing sadboy what did they do to you#also!! can i mention that these shows had such better representation than nowadays marvel#murdock's actor doing extensive research on blind motility for the role#jessica and trish's friendship and how trish immediately believes jess about kilgrave#the whole!!! unique community feel of harlem and in luke's bar#hogarth whos both jessica's employer and foggy's boss in later seasons being a lesbian and having Real Marriage Issues#and also being a conplex and kinda shitty person#iron fist was....eh but that's why it was the worst one lmao#OH YEAH HOW COULD I FORGET MY GIRL KAREN#karen page getting a whole storyline in s1 about her dealing w ptsd and then getting fleshed out backstory and her own adventures#like ok it was kinda weird in daredevil that she dated like every guy bc she was the female lead 💀#but even then foggy and matt and her figuring their shit out like adults. like they shot their shots and it didnt pan out. still besties th#disney would never allow such good writing in current times#but a boy can wish
156 notes
·
View notes
Text
Executive position femme domme in skirt and heels x butch secretary in suit.. is that anything??
#Sorry this is soo unethical but I'm in employment discrimination law lecture rn thinking about a butch subordinate kneeling under my desk#Getting a bj while I work 😵💫🫣🤧🫢#femme dom#femme dom hours or whatever >:)
76 notes
·
View notes
Text
Predatory NDAs Just Got a Lot Harder To Enforce
Did we just help you out? Join our Patreon!
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
so excited, my union is doing warning strikes on guy fawkes' day
#maybe we'll explode the employers#wouldn't that be funny#(for the record if german law enforcement is reading this I am neither planning on nor capable of bombing rich evil guys I prommy)
18 notes
·
View notes
Note
I was recently reminded that Harry in his second year THREW A FIREWORK into an active potion across the classroom so that Hermione could steal rare and expensive ingredients. Any Chemistry teacher would’ve had him out on his ear for doing the same thing in a lab, never to return - stunts like that with chemicals could kill someone! Snape had some unfair (if realistic) reasons to dislike Harry, but a couple of extremely reasonable ones lol.
you're right and you should say it, anon. harry is a menace in that classroom.
this is, i think, one of the main reasons why any reading of snape by adults needs to engage properly with the genre conventions which govern his characterisation. because snape's exaggerated meanness is completely necessary to the role he plays in the story - and adult readers really need to treat that contextually, rather than foaming at the mouth about how upsetting a character in a children's story is for them - but, when he's looked at outside of those conventions... the man is having a nightmare at work.
child readers see things like harry yeeting a firework into a big bowl of chemicals and find it heroic and funny, as the story requires them to do, which means - as a result - that they find snape's reaction to him (and, especially, to neville, who is also a danger in the classroom, no matter what else we can say about snape's treatment of him) ridiculous and unfair.
but, obviously, as adults we can see things through a slightly more health-and-safety-focused lens and... yeah, as you say, if any of us had fucked about in chemistry at school like harry and ron fuck about in potions we would not have remained in the classroom for much longer...
all of the hogwarts teachers seem to have hellish jobs with no personal lives. and so we can all guess what the lesson is there...
join a union, kids.
117 notes
·
View notes
Text
hot take i think requiring employees to do work requiring focus directly next to 8 other people making noises and talking on the phone and not allowing the use of headphones is unreasonable
#employment#neurodivergency#neurodivergent#work#tried to get permission to wear headphones one time and was told#ok for Just This One Task this one time but only if you stay aware of your surroundings the entire time#which defeats the point of wearing headphones#i know disability law/took a class on it and it isn't applicable to me in this situation
29 notes
·
View notes
Text
officially a law school graduate now 🥹
#ft the teddy mum got me because they forgot to get me grad flowers#ive called him tedminister for now but also debating. will. after yk wills#bit annoyed at my grades but whatever i genuinely cannae complain lol#anyway now to employment#lettos says#live laugh law
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
What to do when something illegal happens at work
When your boss does something illegal at work, it's common to freeze up because you're not sure what to do. Here are a few tips for how to handle those situations during and after:
While it is happening:
Keep yourself safe. In the moment, your first priority is always to keep yourself and others from physical harm and out of danger as much as possible. If any other advice I give you conflicts with that, your safety takes priority.
Make sure you know where you are. If you think your safety might be at risk, getting your bearings can be critically important. Take note of potential exit routes, hazards, the flow of traffic (both vehicle and foot traffic), cameras, and any safe areas you know of. Later, knowledge of your exact location may be very important in reconstructing events.
Check the time. Knowing exactly when something happened, and how long it took, will be extremely valuable.
Look around for witnesses, and try to bring some over if possible. Witnesses will both reduce the likelihood of more outrageous behavior and help you to take action afterwards. Do your best to remember who was there.
Say "please let me finish" every time you're interrupted, and count the number of times it happened. Bullies love to interrupt people at the first sign of disagreement, and then later they'll claim that nobody disagreed with them when instead nobody could get in a word edgewise. Saying "please let me finish" calls out the fact that they were interrupting, and a count of the times you were interrupted will help you protect yourself from being misinterpreted later.
Avoid agreeing to anything or signing anything if possible. You have the right to review any document that you're asked to sign, which usually includes taking the document and having it examined by an attorney. If you're being threatened with serious consequences if you don't sign immediately, write "signed under duress". If they're asking for a verbal agreement, try to get them to accept a "let me think about it/check my to-do list/etc" rather than a hard "yes". Even if the thing you'd be agreeing to is something you're okay with, it's still important not to agree to things when you don't feel like you're allowed to say "no"; in stressful situations, our judgment can be seriously compromised, and allowing yourself to be bullied into saying "yes" will set a bad precedent for further interactions.
After it's over, as soon as you're in a safe place:
Complete the WTWFU checklist
Send a follow-up email summarizing your understanding of what was communicated. It can be as simple as "just to ensure we understood each other, what I got was that you were telling me/us that [we'll be disciplined if we discuss our wages/contacting a union is a fireable offense/our pay will be docked if anyone submits a complaint to OSHA/etc], is that correct?". If there is information that protects you, such as a health condition or pregnancy you need accommodation for or a prior agreement that is being violated, include it in your email even if the company already knows. CC HR and any coworkers who were present and BCC your personal email*. Forward any responses to your personal email as well*.
Rescind any agreements you made. Either in the same email as step #2 or in a separate email, depending on what you think is appropriate, say "I didn't feel like I could safely say 'no' in that situation, so I'd like to rescind my earlier agreement until I've had some time to reconsider." If it's something you think you'd have otherwise agreed to, try to offer a time frame for an actual decision. CC HR and BCC your personal email*.
Collect any evidence you can, and make note of any evidence that exists but isn't accessible to you. This includes emails about the issue, any photos that were already taken or that you can safely and legally take,
If something illegal was done or hinted at, contact the applicable regulatory agency as soon as possible with all of the information above.
Consider arranging a consult with an employment law attorney -- consults aren't the same as retainers, they're considerably cheaper (or sometimes free, depending on your income and the possibility of a lawsuit) and can either turn into ongoing representation or just be a one-time service.
* Don't include information that you have a legitimate duty to safeguard, such as customer data, protected health information, or non-public market-affecting information. This does not include any information pertaining to working conditions, your compensation, regulatory compliance, or workplace safety -- the company isn't allowed to demand that you keep those a secret. Either try to get the point across without including the specific information that's being safeguarded, or censor it by replacing it with two underscores per replacement with generic descreptors as necessary (i.e. 'I have safety concerns about the release of our secret robotics project on January 10' becomes 'I have safety concerns about the release of our __[project]__ on __[date]__').
39 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why does the right constantly believe they are not being idealistic, the world needs to conform to your beliefs for them to work too, things are not going to just turn on a dime because you think you're intellectually superior for not thinking about the impact your changes would have on other people
#both sides drive me up the fucking wall#yes I position myself in the right side of the political spectrum but holy shit#'abolishing the police is a bad idea but we should abolish public schools'#'taxing the rich won't work because they avoid taxes like the plague so let's abolish all taxes and rely on people's generosity instead'#'we have declining birth rates and this is going to destroy the middle class and the military and the elderly but fuck maternity leave'#'employers are increasingly discriminating against women and mothers who need to work to support their families because the middle class is#shrinking but employers should be allowed to discriminate against whoever they want because they can't possibly have existing biases'#there's no quippy way to say it but the right believes gun safety laws can never properly be applied much like the left believes#pro-life laws can never be properly applied therefore restrictions are illogical at best and dangerous at worst#do you guys see what I'm saying here
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Republicans are lying when they say they care about the safety and wellbeing of children.
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
RANT
#hey boss#u uh- u said i was working sun n wed- can i have more consistent days so i have days to block out for interviews?#.#uve been forewarned#ok so its four months into my gap year and HOLY SHIT JOB SEARCHING IS SO FRUSTRATING#so im working as a clerk at this law firm mon and wed (only 8 hours total tho)#n i THOT i had my reatil job in the bag but then boss goes “yea im really sorry but i cant give u three days - only sundays and weds”#so i was like great ok i need another job thats cool ill just bliock out sundays and weds for potential employers#THEN on sat boss texts n goes “ahhh i dont need u till next week- also can u switch ur wed to fri”. ??????? MA'AM#so i go#she says sorry kid i dont WHICH IS FINE I APPRICIATE THE COMMUNICATION#so i have an interview the next day at a coffee shop for a time THE MANAGER OFFERED#i show up after having pit my day aside for this noon interview#i walk in employees go “uh ho manager stepped out”#she camnt come back for the rest of the day AND doesnt apologize in her email- just “unfourntallyyyy i didnt have time to check my email”#MAAM YOU SEND THE INVITE#whatever#luckily last friday i was invited to this job fair by like four diff locations in san fran n was immeditaly hired#(first trial shift tmr yay!)#but the commute is gonna be KILLER#however im hopeful n i love coffee so yay#also my pet sitting is taking off ive got two sits booked for october#which is suprising bc im also traveling for half the month#manchester edenbrough st andrews milan lake como babayyyyyyy#also this thursday im heading to chicago and maine for a wedding (yay go love!) and to tenessee for another wedding in jan#so now ive got law firm retail associate barista dog sitter n i just KNOW when the holidays roll around n both retail jobs will be wack ill#be floored#but. ahem anywats good things frustrating thinsg stressful things but GOD am i glad i took this gap year#oh yea and ive been hiking tones! lands end trail#tilden park
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
#ausgov#politas#auspol#tasgov#taspol#australia#fuck neoliberals#neoliberal capitalism#anthony albanese#albanese government#jobsearch#jobseekers#online jobs#part time jobs#jobs#job hunting#inside job#job#employment#employees#employers#slavery#exploitation#exploitative#human rights#class war#eat the rich#eat the fucking rich#law#morals
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
I keep seeing people respond to the Microsoft Recall bullshit with there's an ability to disable it and that misses the point. Several points in fact.
It's only a matter of time until an update bugs/"bugs" it and re-enables it without warning so people who had previously disabled it think they're in the clear until their info is leaked or they get a warning they're low on storage space.
If people don't have admin rights, they may not be able to disable it. Laptops given by work or school lock down what people can do with them, some going as far as dictating which browser one has to use on them. Even if you don't need admin rights to disable Recall, you may not have the ability to do so without losing the laptop and/or job and/or education.
I'm unsure of how it would handle multiple accounts but if it can be locked by someone else to always be enabled, children and people in abusive situations would also be unable to disable it. Even if it can't be locked, disabling it could result in punishment from a parent or the abuser.
Is it really disabled or is it "disabled" in that what the user sees is it being disabled while it's still collecting information and/or sending information to Microsoft in the background?
Such a feature should never have been automatically enabled in the first place. It's bad, predatory design to have such a feature enabled from the start and to expect users AKA customers to go out of their way to look up and then opt-out of something.
If disabling it really disables it, it can still result in stress and concern that it's not. The vast majority of people do not have the skills or knowledge to look into the OS guts to give themselves peace of mind that it really truly is disabled.
I'm sure I'm missing some, too.
TLDR is disabling is a bandaid someone else may rip off for you, someone may hurt you if you use, it may not work at all except as a placebo, and should have never been needed in the first place.
#that's not even touching on the legal aspect where it existing at all violates laws for some regions/companies/governments#the ability to disable also doesn't matter if you're barred from ever disabling it in the first place#how long until parents start berating/grounding/beating their kid(s) for 'using up all the storage space'?#and if google's 'ai' is anything to go by recall will have limited use and get things wrong#while also being a privacy and safety nightmare#there's already a history feature in windows and your browser of choice (plus bookmarks in said browser)#to me this smacks of find a use for something they developed without having a use first#while also adding a way for employers to spy on/control workers at a time when working from home is much more common#because while some employers will ban it others will use it to spy on employees and require it be enabled#'if you don't want us to know your personal passwords don't use work computers for personal browsing or accounts'#but also don't use your personal devices or pee outside of designated pee breaks as recall won't trigger if you're in the same spot#can't even set up a slow scroll or anything because the screenshots will show them you were on the same page for however long
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
i still can't get over that HR fucked up so badly that i just suddenly owed $10,000. despite me calling attention to the error in december. which they proceeded to do nothing about for 6 months
#🐭📓#at least i'm getting a tax return i guess#but my income is majorly reduced for the next 6 months :))))))#you'd expect the grad school and uni hr to communicate about employment. but alas#this phd better be fucking worth it because whenever i think about the fact that i have a whole year left i lose a little more will to live#it's not “suddenly” in the sense that i didn't expect it because i knew there was something wrong#but more that i thought they were just slow to fix it and suddenly they were scrambling to figure everything out#and citing laws at me about how it was their right to get the money back like calm down I WAS THE ONE WHO TOLD YOU ABOUT THE ERROR. AGAIN.#why would i do that if i was planning on refusing to pay it back#anyway. not getting the money in the first place would've sucked way less than suddenly having to cough it all up 🙃
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hi, me again with an ask response to an ask, this time re asking for Shabbat accommodations before converting. If anon lives in the US, these FAQs, these guidance materials, and this text of the law, all from EEOC, should help. I pulled this from the first link (bolding for emphasis is mine):
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on religion. This includes refusing to accommodate an employee's sincerely held religious beliefs or practices unless the accommodation would impose an undue hardship (more than a minimal burden on operation of the business). A religious practice may be sincerely held by an individual even if newly adopted, not consistently observed, or different from the commonly followed tenets of the individual's religion."
If anon is not from the US, I recommend researching all relevant laws before they approach their employer.
Best of luck, anon!
Exactly!! This is great information to have in general, and I hope this will prove helpful to everyone!
This is absolutely true; in my answer, I focused mostly on the idea that you don't have to tell them why you need the time off. I am selective about what my employers know about me, and I encourage everyone to have the discernment between professional and personal life and boundaries. You don't have to justify your life to your employer, and they (in the U.S.) are not entitled to religious discrimination regardless of your status. This is a great reminder, and I want to thank you for reminding me of what is in that title, and for taking the time to send this! It's most certainly appreciated 🩵
#ask#jumblr#jew by choice#jewish conversion#convert FAQs#personal thoughts tag#and while it isn't lawful to engage in religious discrimination there are instances of it still and there's that risk#which is why i said in the original answer that you might want to critically think of how much information to give to others#i really don't think employers are entitled to know why you need time off in the first place AND they shouldn't discriminate once they know
11 notes
·
View notes