#Elisabeth rohm

[marril96]

Law & Order 15.13 | Ain't No Love

[crimeshowsource]

ELISABETH RÖHM as A.D.A. SERENA SOUTHERLYN LAW & ORDER | 15.2 "The Dead Wives Club"

[crimeshowsource]

ELISABETH RÖHM as A.D.A. SERENA SOUTHERLYN LAW & ORDER | 12.15 "Access Nation"

[5x04loss]

LAW AND ORDER ∟ 14.13 Married with Children

[spockvarietyhour]

[sapphiccharacterstournament]

Canon Sapphic Characters Tournament Round One (Bracket 7)

[camyfilms]

ABDUCTION 2011

You wanna drink like a man, then let's see if you can fight like a man.

[midnightcelebrities]

Elisabeth Rohm

[ats-caps]

[girl4music]

I have some fundamental problems with watching ‘Angel the Series’ that I’m not sure can be resolved by continuing to watch it. This redemption story doesn’t work. I know the writing wants me to see it that way but I just can’t. It’s fundamentally flawed in its goal.

KATE LOCKLEY: “Our suspect will be a white male. To the observer he will not seem a monster. His victims put up little or no struggle, so it’s likely that he is charming, attractive, but at his core he is a loner. Possibly a dual personality, who once the crime has been committed, retains no memory of the act. He will not view his victims as subhuman, rather it’s himself that he views as something other than human, more than human, a superior species. Stalking his prey, getting to know them. It’s unlikely that he’ll be married though he may have recently come off a long-term relationship that ended badly. We look for a precipitating event in cases such as this, and a painful breakup is always at the top of the list. Prior to failing this relationship may have marked an inactive period in our suspects life. He would have regarded it as a lifeline, his salvation, but once ended, it resulted in his recidivism. - What is not in question is his experience. He’s been doing this for a very long time, and he will do it again.”

I keep saying it over and over again. If it is not the choice of the character, (and specifically with Angel/Angelus) nor the experience of the character, then why does it matter what that character does about it?

They make it out as if Angelus really is a completely different person/entity to Angel because Angel isn’t present in Angelus’ experience and Angelus isn’t present in Angel’s experience. So why then does Angel have to redeem Angelus’ actions and why does Angelus have to feel threatened by Angel’s? This is what’s bothering me about the whole concept of him being a vampire cursed with a soul - or a conscience. If neither of them can remember anything they did as the other, then why is it each other’s problem? Why does Angelus inform Angel and why does Angel inform Angelus? The narrative wants me to believe that they’re two entirely different people/entities. But if that is so, if I believe that, then this redemption story is pointless because it’s not Angel’s fault for it.

I’m struggling with understanding how any of it works.

And there’s something else that’s bothering me too but probably will be fixed with further character development. Angel’s actions and choices with helping the helpless are starting to become more about him being the helper. It’s coming across more like he wants to be absolved instead of be redeemed. And I feel like the split-divide identity/personality thing is a marker for that. Which would make sense. But if the narrative wants me to interpret it differently, then I’m going to have great difficulty in doing that.

Guys, really, what am I watching here? What story are they really trying to tell? There’s a lot of problems. Or is there layers to it I’m not getting at the moment?

[twenty-words-or-less]

Wish Upon

Summary: High school student Clare Shannon (Joey King) finds a music box that grants seven wishes... and kills a close friend or family member in return.

Unintentionally hilarious horror effort from the cinematographer of the Insidious films. Weird, considering how flat this film’s cinematography is.

Rating: 1.25/5

Photo credit: Vulture

[soovermyself]

Sophia is in a photo posted by Garcelle on Instagram

That’s why I love y’all! Thanks for the heads up! ❤️

[on-this-day-btvs]

October 12, 1999

Lonely Hearts aired for ATS season 1, episode 2. This was the first appearance of Kate Lockley, an LAPD detective who suspects Angel is a killer. Kate is played by Elisabeth Rohm and made a total of 15 appearances in seasons 1 and 2.

(image credit to buffyversefans)

[ats-caps]

[ats-caps]

[ats-caps]