#Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

[rohitpalan]

Market Disruptions and Adaptations in Electronic Manufacturing Services

The global Electronic Manufacturing Services (EMS) market is poised for substantial growth, fueled by the escalating demand and robust sales of consumer electronics. According to the latest market projections, the Electronic Manufacturing Services market is anticipated to reach a valuation of US$ 541,554.4 million by the end of 2023.

This market is forecasted to experience a steady Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 4.7% during the period 2023-2033, ultimately soaring to a total value of approximately US$ 859,959.3 million by 2033.

Electronic Manufacturing Services has received a warm welcome in a variety of industries since its introduction, owing to its diverse applications in areas such as control framework for radar observation, mission control PC in aeroplanes and satellites, and so on.

– Unlock Precious Insights: Download Our Sample Now! @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-5870

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market: Drivers and Challenges

An increased demand and sales of electronics, especially consumer electronics, is witnessed globally which is further expected to rise in the forecast period. This demand correspondingly increases the adoption and implementation of Electronic Manufacturing Services, which as a result, drives the global Electronics Manufacturing Services market.

In addition to this, implementation and utilization of Electronic Manufacturing Services offers flexibility aligned with market demand, provides continuous supply of services, mitigates the risk and reduces the overall operational cost of a company. These factors are expected to, furthermore, drive the growth of Electronic Manufacturing Services market.

The decline in the adoption of Personal Computers (desktops, notebooks, etc.) is one of the major factors challenging the growth of Electronic Manufacturing Services market.

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Key Players

Some of the key players in the Electronic Manufacturing Services market are Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Creation Technologies LP, Celestica Inc., Venture Corporation Limited, Sparqtron Corporation, NATEL ENGINEERING CO., INC., API Technologies Corp, FLEX LTD., Foxconn Electronics Inc. and Integrated Micro-Electronics, Inc.

The research report presents a comprehensive assessment of the market and contains thoughtful insights, facts, historical data, and statistically supported and industry-validated market data. It also contains projections using a suitable set of assumptions and methodologies. The research report provides analysis and information according to market segments such as geographies, application, and industry.

Competition Analysis – Regional Trends:

The Electronic Manufacturing Services landscape is marked by intense competition on a global scale. Leading players in regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America are vying for market dominance. Asia-Pacific, in particular, stands out as a frontrunner in the market, owing to its robust manufacturing infrastructure, skilled labor force, and favorable regulatory environment. North America and Europe, while mature markets, continue to play a significant role in shaping industry trends through technological advancements and innovations.

In May 2022- Ohio. Hon Hai Technology Group (“Foxconn”), signed a contract with Lordstown Motors Corp. (“Lordstown Motors” or “LMC”) for a manufacturing agreement and a joint venture agreement for product development.

In August 2021, Toronto-based contract electronics manufacturer Celestica Inc. marked the grand opening of its AbelConn Electronics facility in Maple Grove, Minn, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celestica. The facility provides rapid prototyping, volume manufacturing, and engineering support for the defense and aerospace industries.

In August 2022, Taiwanese electronics giant Foxconn is looking at making electric vehicles in India, part of a larger diversification plan to expand its Asian manufacturing supply chain beyond China, according to people aware of developments at the contract phone maker for Apple.

– Your Competitive Edge: Get a Personalized Report Merging Regional Data and Market Competitors @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/customization-available/rep-gb-5870

Key Segments Covered in the Electronic Manufacturing Services Industry Analysis

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market by Industry:

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Medical and Healthcare

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Defence and Aerospace

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Industrial Applications

Electronic Manufacturing Services for IT and Telecommunication

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Other Applications

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market by Region:

North America Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Latin America Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Europe Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Asia Pacific Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Middle East & Africa Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

[sagarg889]

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market By System Type, End User, Region, Industry Analysis and Forecast 2022-2032

Generally electronic manufacturing services market request should be respected at US$ 525,271.0 Million of each 2022, check to make at a CAGR of 5.0% to be respected at US$ 856,201.0 Million from 2022 to 2032. Progression is credited to the rising interest and plans of client electronics. From 2016-2021 a CAGR of 4.5% was chosen for the electronic manufacturing services market.

The presentation of Electronic Manufacturing Services has disposed of the essential for relationship, to make and store giant inventories of electronics parts and things. Electronic Manufacturing Services supplier offers refreshed flexibility by taking note of unanticipated requests rapidly and profitably.

The term Electronic Manufacturing Services is associated with the affiliations managing electronic parts, for gathering, test, and return/fix services for these parts to the primary stuff producers. The services gave unite thing the board, store network the bosses services, plan arranging services, test arranging services, box foster services and others.

Get a Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-5870

Since its show high gathering of Electronic Manufacturing Services is seen in various organizations because of its fluctuating applications in spots, for instance, control structure for radar perception, mission control PC in plane and satellite, etc.

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market: Drivers and Challenges

Globally, there is an increase in demand and sales of electronics, particularly consumer electronics, which is expected to continue in the forecast period. This demand drives the global Electronic Manufacturing Services market by increasing adoption and implementation of Electronic Manufacturing Services.

Furthermore, the implementation and utilisation of Electronic Manufacturing Services provides flexibility aligned with market demand, a continuous supply of services, mitigates risk, and reduces a company's overall operational cost. These factors are also expected to drive the growth of the Electronic Manufacturing Services market.

One of the major factors impeding the growth of the Electronic Manufacturing Services market is the decline in the adoption of Personal Computers (desktops, notebooks, etc.).

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Key Players

Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Creation Technologies LP, Celestica Inc., Venture Corporation Limited, Sparqtron Corporation, NATEL ENGINEERING CO., INC., API Technologies Corp, FLEX LTD., Foxconn Electronics Inc., and Integrated Micro-Electronics, Inc. are some of the key players in the Electronic Manufacturing Services market.

The research report provides an in-depth analysis of the market and includes thoughtful insights, facts, historical data, and statistically supported and industry-validated market data. It also includes projections based on an appropriate set of assumptions and methodologies. The research report analyses and provides information based on market segments such as geography, application, and industry.

Market Competition

Benchmark Electronics Inc., Creation Technologies LP, Celestica Inc., Venture Corporation Limited, Sparqtron Corporation, NATEL ENGINEERING CO., INC., API Technologies Corp, FLEX LTD., Foxconn Electronics Inc., and Integrated Micro-Electronics, Inc. are among the key players in the global electronic dictionary market.

Because of the large number of participants, the market is extremely competitive. While global players such as Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Creation Technologies LP, and Celestica Inc. dominate the market, several regional level players are also active in key growth regions, particularly Asia Pacific.

In May 2022- Ohio. Hon Hai Technology Group (“Foxconn”), signed a contract with Lordstown Motors Corp. (“Lordstown Motors” or “LMC”) for a manufacturing agreement and a joint venture agreement for product development.

In August 2021, Toronto-based contract electronics manufacturer Celestica Inc. marked the grand opening of its AbelConn Electronics facility in Maple Grove, Minn, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celestica. The facility provides rapid prototyping, volume manufacturing, and engineering support for the defense and aerospace industries.

In August 2022, Taiwanese electronics giant Foxconn is looking at making electric vehicles in India, part of a larger diversification plan to expand its Asian manufacturing supply chain beyond China, according to people aware of developments at the contract phone maker for Apple.

Get More Information on this Report @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/electronic-manufacturing-services-market

Key Segments Covered in the Electronic Manufacturing Services Industry Analysis

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market by Industry:

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Medical and Healthcare

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Defence and Aerospace

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Industrial Applications

Electronic Manufacturing Services for IT and Telecommunication

Electronic Manufacturing Services for Other Applications

Electronic Manufacturing Services Market by Region:

North America Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Latin America Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Europe Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Asia Pacific Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

Middle East & Africa Electronic Manufacturing Services Market

[umadeochake]

Telecom Electronic Manufacturing Services Market Trends, Business Opportunity 2024-2036

Research Nester assesses the growth and market size of global telecom electronic manufacturing services market which is anticipated to be on account of the growing technological advancements in customer electronics and increasing investment in IoT.

Research Nester’s recent market research analysis on “Telecom Electronic Manufacturing Services Market: Global Demand Analysis & Opportunity Outlook 2036” delivers a detailed competitor’s analysis and a detailed overview of the global telecom electronic manufacturing services market in terms of market segmentation by services, end-user and by region.

Growing Demand for Telecommunication Services to Promote Global Market Share of Telecom Electronic Manufacturing Services

The global telecom electronic manufacturing services market is estimated to grow majorly on account of the surge in the adoption of mobile phones and data-driven communication. According to the World Economic Forum, in 2022, there were more than 8.58 billion active mobile subscribers globally, out of a total population of 7.95 billion. There is a sizable market for EMS providers as a result of the rising demand for communications services, which not only calls for the creation of more devices but also needs advanced technology and experience in electronic manufacturing.

Request Free Sample Copy of this Report @ https://www.researchnester.com/sample-request-6347

Telecom EMS providers are essential in satisfying the growing demand since they provide specialized manufacturing services. These services include the manufacturing of intricate parts, including printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs), which aid in the creation of cutting-edge telecommunications equipment. EMS providers are becoming vital partners for businesses hoping to successfully and efficiently satisfy the changing demands of a connected world as the telecommunications industry grows.

Some of the major growth factors and challenges that are associated with the growth of the global telecom electronic manufacturing services market are:

Growth Drivers:

Increasing demand for seamless connectivity

Growing trend of outsourcing manufacturing services

Challenges:

The cost of manufacturing electronic components for telecoms is too high. Manufacturing components requires a significant capital expenditure, in contrast to the assembling, testing, and packing procedures that make up equipment production. Modern equipment, technology, and employee training come at a high cost to the sector. These hefty up-front costs can discourage new businesses, especially smaller ones, from entering the market and growing. Therefore, the manufacturing cost of electronic components may impede the growth of the telecom electronic manufacturing services market.

By services, the global telecom electronic manufacturing services market is segmented into electronic design & engineering, electronics assembly, electronic manufacturing, and supply chain management.  The electronic design & engineering segment is set to garner highest revenue by the end of 2036 by growing at a significant CAGR over the forecast period. This service involves developing schematics, designing circuitry, and ensuring electronic systems operate efficiently. To satisfy the changing needs of the telecom sector, a notable trend in this market is the growing emphasis on miniaturization, energy efficiency, and the integration of cutting-edge technology. In the rapidly developing telecommunications sector, providers in this space concentrate on offering cutting-edge solutions that improve the functionality and performance of electrical components.

Request for customization @ https://www.researchnester.com/customized-reports-6347

By region, the Europe telecom electronic manufacturing services market is to generate the highest revenue by the end of 2036. The expected expansion is driven by the increasing implementation of 5G networks, as well as the rising need for interconnected devices. Government initiatives that promote electronics manufacturing and provide incentives for it have been instrumental in driving the growth of EMS (electronics manufacturing services) providers. These initiatives include policies, subsidies, and programs aimed at fostering the development and expansion of the electronics manufacturing industry. The European telecom industry's growing trend of outsourcing, driven by a desire for efficient and affordable solutions, is driving the market's expansion and establishing the region as a major participant in the worldwide telecom EMS business.

This report also provides the existing competitive scenario of some of the key players of the Foxconn Technology Group, FLEX LTD., Jabil Inc., Plexus Corp., Benchmark Electronics, Inc., Sanmina Corporation, Kimball Electronics, Inc., Wistron Corporation, Zolner Elektronik AG, and Celestia Inc.

Access our detailed report @ https://www.researchnester.com/reports/telecom-electronic-manufacturing-services-market/6347

About Research Nester-

Research Nester is a leading service provider for strategic market research and consulting. We aim to provide unbiased, unparalleled market insights and industry analysis to help industries, conglomerates and executives to take wise decisions for their future marketing strategy, expansion and investment etc. We believe every business can expand to its new horizon, provided a right guidance at a right time is available through strategic minds. Our out of box thinking helps our clients to take wise decision in order to avoid future uncertainties.

Contact for more Info:

AJ Daniel

Email: info@researchnester.com

U.S. Phone: +1 646 586 9123

U.K. Phone: +44 203 608 5919

[thetejasamale]

Focus on core competencies is driving the Electronic Manufacturing Services Market Growth...

[mmr-14]

https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/electronic-contract-manufacturing-and-design-services-market/23593/

The electronic contract manufacturing and design services concentrate primarily on technologies and sub-technologies such as computers, consumer devices, networking, servers and storage, telecommunications, and peripherals.

[treethymes]

With the exceptions of North Korea and Cuba, the communist world has merged onto the capitalist highway in a couple different ways during the twenty-first century. As you’ve read, free-trade imperialism and its cheap agricultural imports pushed farmers into the cities and into factory work, lowering the global price of manufacturing labor and glutting the world market with stuff. Forward-thinking states such as China and Vietnam invested in high-value-added production capacity and managed labor organizing, luring links from the global electronics supply chain and jump-starting capital investment. Combined with capital’s hesitancy to invest in North Atlantic production facilities, as well as a disinclination toward state-led investment in the region, Asian top-down planning erased much of the West’s technological edge. If two workers can do a single job, and one worker costs less, both in wages and state support, why pick the expensive one? Foxconn’s 2017 plan to build a U.S. taxpayer–subsidized $10 billion flat-panel display factory in Wisconsin was trumpeted by the president, but it was a fiasco that produced zero screens. The future cost of labor looks to be capped somewhere below the wage levels many people have enjoyed, and not just in the West.

The left-wing economist Joan Robinson used to tell a joke about poverty and investment, something to the effect of: The only thing worse than being exploited by capitalists is not being exploited by capitalists. It’s a cruel truism about the unipolar world, but shouldn’t second place count for something? When the Soviet project came to an end, in the early 1990s, the country had completed world history’s biggest, fastest modernization project, and that didn’t just disappear. Recall that Cisco was hyped to announce its buyout of the Evil Empire’s supercomputer team. Why wasn’t capitalist Russia able to, well, capitalize? You’re already familiar with one of the reasons: The United States absorbed a lot of human capital originally financed by the Soviet people. American immigration policy was based on draining technical talent in particular from the Second World. Sergey Brin is the best-known person in the Moscow-to-Palo-Alto pipeline, but he’s not the only one.

Look at the economic composition of China and Russia in the wake of Soviet dissolution: Both were headed toward capitalist social relations, but they took two different routes. The Russian transition happened rapidly. The state sold off public assets right away, and the natural monopolies such as telecommunications and energy were divided among a small number of skilled and connected businessmen, a category of guys lacking in a country that frowned on such characters but that grew in Gorbachev’s liberalizing perestroika era. Within five years, the country sold off an incredible 35 percent of its national wealth. Russia’s richest ended the century with a full counterrevolutionary reversal of their fortunes, propelling their income share above what it was before the Bolsheviks took over. To accomplish this, the country’s new capitalists fleeced the most vulnerable half of their society. “Over the 1989–2016 period, the top 1 percent captured more than two-thirds of the total growth in Russia,” found an international group of scholars, “while the bottom 50 percent actually saw a decline in its income.” Increases in energy prices encouraged the growth of an extractionist petro-centered economy. Blood-covered, teary, and writhing, infant Russian capital crowded into the gas and oil sectors. The small circle of oligarchs privatized unemployed KGB-trained killers to run “security,” and gangsters dominated politics at the local and national levels. They installed a not particularly well-known functionary—a former head of the new intelligence service FSB who also worked on the privatization of government assets—as president in a surprise move on the first day of the year 2000. He became the gangster in chief.

Vladimir Putin’s first term coincided with the energy boom, and billionaires gobbled up a ludicrous share of growth. If any individual oligarch got too big for his britches, Putin was not beyond imposing serious consequences. He reinserted the state into the natural monopolies, this time in collaboration with loyal capitalists, and his stranglehold on power remains tight for now, despite the outstandingly uneven distribution of growth. Between 1980 and 2015, the Russian top 1 percent grew its income an impressive 6.2 percent per year, but the top .001 percent has maintained a growth rate of 17 percent over the same period. To invest these profits, the Russian billionaires parked their money in real estate, bidding up housing prices, and stashed a large amount of their wealth offshore. Reinvestment in Russian production was not a priority—why go through the hassle when there were easier ways to keep getting richer?

While Russia grew billionaires instead of output, China saw a path to have both. As in the case of Terry Gou, the Chinese Communist Party tempered its transition by incorporating steadily increasing amounts of foreign direct investment through Hong Kong and Taiwan, picking partners and expanding outward from the special economic zones. State support for education and infrastructure combined with low wages to make the mainland too attractive to resist. (Russia’s population is stagnant, while China’s has grown quickly.) China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, in 2001, gave investors more confidence. Meanwhile, strong capital controls kept the country out of the offshore trap, and state development priorities took precedence over extraction and get-rich-quick schemes. Chinese private wealth was rechanneled into domestic financial assets—equity and bonds or other loan instruments—at a much higher rate than it was in Russia. The result has been a sustained high level of annual output growth compared to the rest of the world, the type that involves putting up an iPhone City in a matter of months. As it has everywhere else, that growth has been skewed: only an average of 4.5 percent for the bottom half of earners in the 1978–2015 period compared to more than 10 percent for the top .001 percent. But this ratio of just over 2–1 is incomparable to Russia’s 17–.5 ration during the same period.

Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, certain trends have been more or less unavoidable. The rich have gotten richer relative to the poor and working class—in Russia, in China, in the United States, and pretty much anywhere else you want to look. Capital has piled into property markets, driving up the cost of housing everywhere people want to live, especially in higher-wage cities and especially in the world’s financial centers. Capitalist and communist countries alike have disgorged public assets into private pockets. But by maintaining a level of control over the process and slowing its tendencies, the People’s Republic of China has built a massive and expanding postindustrial manufacturing base.

It’s important to understand both of these patterns as part of the same global system rather than as two opposed regimes. One might imagine, based on what I’ve written so far, that the Chinese model is useful, albeit perhaps threatening, in the long term for American tech companies while the Russian model is irrelevant. Some commentators have phrased this as the dilemma of middle-wage countries on the global market: Wages in China are going to be higher than wages in Russia because wages in Russia used to be higher than wages in China. But Russia’s counterrevolutionary hyper-bifurcation has been useful for Silicon Valley as well; they are two sides of the same coin. Think about it this way: If you’re a Russian billionaire in the first decades of the twenty-first century looking to invest a bunch of money you pulled out of the ground, where’s the best place you could put it? The answer is Palo Alto.

Malcolm Harris, Palo Alto

[ourtalechara]

Don't ask what I'm doing I'm not doing anything (VBS Data Stream guys look at it)

Kohane An Akito Toya and Luka

(actually nice and finished looking lyrics under cut)

Eventually, all walls meet demolition

So Wall Street had to keep the tradition

Their financial systems resigned to ignition

And out of the ashes, we have arisen

An empire is forged in the fire of ambition

In business, there isn't the time for attrition

Invest to suppress then ingest competition

Then each acquisition is new ammunition

When governments crumble and fall to the floor

That was paved with the graves of a corporate war

A fundament funded in blood just to shore

A foundation for founding our covenant

Born of a need for control of societal entropy

Enterprise at the price of your indemnity

Chart out the course and of course you were meant to be

Bent to the will of a corporate entity

Arasaka Security. You're in safe hands

We're the light in your screens, we're the lead in your veins

Then you wake from your dreams, so we can sell them again

In the light we distract with the shiny and new

So you're blind to the fact that the product is you

So let your brain dance and replay the dream

But don't drown in the data stream

'Cause we see where you are and we see where you go

'Cause we know what you own and we own what you know

From the top of all our towers, the corridors of power clearly need rewiring

Arasaka saw the spark and then embarked upon the path to turn that spark to lightning

There's no autonomous megalopolis so populous or prosperous you could reside in

And every citizen that's living in this city is a digit on the charts we're climbing

Political systems are too inefficient

They split like the atom and burned in the fission

Now every department and every decision

Defer to the herds of our corporate divisions

If you don't remember the ballot you cast

It's printed on every receipt you were passed

Each time you selected our products and services

We were elected in each of your purchases

What's left to do when you've got the monopoly?

Turn the consumer into the commodity

It isn't hard where you've hardware neurology

Honestly, do read the company policy

Take information and trade it for wealth

You pay it in each augmentation we sell

It's easy to cut out the middleman

When he's cut out most of himself

Arasaka Finance. Investing in your future

(chorus)

All that you say on the net we composite

To maps that go straight from your head to your pocket

Complain if you want, you're still making deposits

Of data — each day you log on is a profit

Society currently lists electronic

So isn't conducting resistance ironic?

We've plenty of skeletons locked in our closets

But yours are assembled from old-stock hydraulics

So lucky we know just the pieces you need

All plucked from your social media feeds

The places you go and the posts that you read

All snatched for a new algorithm to feed

Now, holding our gold isn't par for the brand

Our silver is sat in the palm of your hand

Quit whining and sign on the line in the sand

The supply does not get to make the demands

(chorus)

Arasaka Manufacturing. Building a better tomorrow

Name, age, qualifications

Race, faith, career aspirations

Political leaning, daily commute

Marital status, favourite fruit

Family, browser, medical history

Hobbies, interests, brand affinity

Fashion, style, your occupation

Gender identity, orientation

Lifestyle choices, dietary needs

The marketing contact you choose to receive

Posts, likes, employers, friends

Social bias, exploitable trends

Tastes, culture, phone of choice

Facial structure, the tone of your voice

If it's inside your head, we know

You can't escape the ebb and flow

(chorus)

When guiding the hand of the market

If it's holding a cheque or a gun

The fingers go deep in your pockets

And you can live under the thumb

You seem so surprised, what did you expect?

We're thinking outside of that box that you checked

The terms were presented in full to inspect

You scrolled to the end just to get to "Accept"

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

Arasaka would like to know your location

[syteline-csi]

Why Infor SyteLine ERP Is Ideal for Mid-Market Manufacturers & Service Providers

When electronics and other mid-market manufacturers want their ERP system to enable growth and create a new competitive advantage, they rely upon Infor Infor SyteLine, also known as CloudSuite Industrial (CSI).

When service and rental equipment providers want their ERP system to enable their growth into world-class service organizations and empower field technicians with data at their fingertips, they also rely upon Infor Infor SyteLine CSI.

We’ve all heard the horror stories of failed ERP implementations so, when manufacturers and service providers want SyteLine ERP successfully implemented—and guaranteed—they rely upon Bridging Business Technology Solutions (BBTS).

An ERP Ideal for Manufacturers

Infor SyteLine is the primary ERP we support because it’s ideal for use by discrete and process manufacturers, especially electronics manufacturers. We also guarantee the success of your Infor SyteLine implementation whether you’re commissioning an ERP system for the first time or replacing your current system, so you can cross the risk of a failed implementation off your list of worries.

SyteLine also can be customized to recognize customer-owned inventory and allocate it only to that customer so you don’t have a unique part number for the same part used by multiple customers. You can also reserve stock for specific products of the same customer or reserve any part in your inventory for a specific order until the order is released.

SyteLine delivers the same type of functionality as SAP and Oracle for a fraction of the cost and headache of implementing a tier 1 ERP system.

An ERP Ideal for Service Providers

Infor SyteLine is the primary ERP we support because it’s a perfect fit for service providers, especially those who rent equipment. We also guarantee the success of your Infor SyteLine implementation. So, whether you’re commissioning an ERP system for the first time or replacing your current system, you don’t have to worry about the disruption of a failed implementation.

Among the biggest benefits of SyteLine for service providers is no longer having to enter data multiple times into disparate systems. Working with common data means that everyone works from the same real-time information, which:

Empowers your service technicians to complete more service orders

Enables your employees to spend more time building relationships with customers

Gives your managers the tools to analyze data and find strategic growth opportunities

SyteLine delivers the same type of functionality as SAP and Oracle for a fraction of the cost and none of the headaches associated with implementing a tier 1 ERP system.

Successful Implementations, Guaranteed

The BBTS team has implemented SyteLine successfully over 165 times since 2013 with a proven ERP implementation process that begins with improving inventory control, planning and forecasting, financial close, and other business processes. SyteLine then standardizes these process best practices and ensures they are followed.

BBTS also provides post-implementation SyteLine enhancements, upgrades, business process improvements, and workflow optimization so you get the most out of your SyteLine investment.

Get Started Today

To determine if SyteLine ERP is right for you, we will connect you with one of our implementation experts as part of a process review. A successful implementation begins with understanding your core business processes, then recreating and evolving them in SyteLine.

Together, we can determine how you will benefit from SyteLine and calculate a target return on investment (ROI) to help justify the move. Contact us to learn more about SyteLine and how we are able to guarantee a successful ERP implementation when so many fail. You can also take advantage of the process review offer.

[sullina]

i think one of the biggest steps we, as a society, will be able to take towards sustainability (of, like... everything) is to eliminate the concept of manufactured obsolescence. For big stuff like houses and buildings, but also smaller stuff, especially electronics of all kinds.

And this got a bit long, but the TL;DR (too long; didn't read) is: capitalism is evil and gonna destroy the entire planet unless we abolish it as soon as possible.

There's no real reason why any kind of computer/tablet/phone/etc. can't last more than like 3 years max. It should be highly illegal for companies to push updates onto our electronics that purposely slow them down, or to stop support of "old" operating systems that aren't even 5 years old yet, in favor of getting a new phone with a new operating system for no reason other than to sell people a new phone.

Same goes for storage, kinda. I have an SD card that's about as big as a SIM card and can store 250GB of data. There's no reason why my phones internal storage is only 25GB, except to push "cloud storage" onto people for companies to secretely mine that data to push more advertising onto us. And why is it always ads, anyway? Like, at least offer me a service, but they're not doing that.

And not just phones, but literally everything. There's no reason why a fridge or an oven or an automatic feeder or ANY kind of smart device should need a wifi connection to just do the one thing it's supposed to do. None. These things worked just fine in the part when we didn't have any internet of things type bullshit, there's no reason to make these things worse except to squeeze more money out of people. (I am aware that "smart things" can be incredibly helpful for disabled people to live an independent life. However, in those cases as well, there's no reason why "no internet" should be a fatal point of failure, and there's no reason why something like a thermostat needs to have an internet connection to recieve voice commands. I mean it needs to know like... 3 or 4 words: an activating phrase, "higher", "lower", and numbers. It cannot be complicated enough to require regular updates via internet.)

and non-electronics as well.

Just take clothes.

So many clothes are made out of "polyesther" or "polyacryl" or something else with the word "poly-" at the start, which usually just means "plastic". And I'm sure there are some uses for plastic clothes like if someone has complicated allergies to a bunch of natural fibers, but there's no reason to have more than 80% of all clothes available on the market be either pure plastic or half plastic. 1) it's absolutely atrocious for the environment, because these clothes leech microplastics into waters like no tomorrow while only lasting like 5 years at best 2) they're just terrible quality-wise. I used to wear a plastic jacket in winter, and i would either sweat to death with it closed without even exhausting myself, or freeze like hell with it open. Neither of which are ideal. Then i got a cotton sweater to wear in winter and i didn't sweat, but i wasn't cold either. I was comfortably warm without getting sweaty, because the sweater let my skin breathe. Plastic can't do that. 3) Vegans can yell about this one all they want, but "vegan leather" is also just plastic. there's no such thing as "vegan leather", but ACTUAL leather may harm an animal (though with as much beef that's sold all over the world, there's no way there's a shortage of cow leather), but it's only gonna "harm" ONE animal. Not every single animal on earth due to byproducts of the manufacturing process and the fact that it never fucking goes away. And real leather is so durable. Like, sure, you kill one animal and get its skin for leather (but also its meat for food and everything else, i don't even know how much), if you care for the thing you made from its skin, you're set for literal generations, because it doesn't break after like 5 years. And if that thing does eventually break, you can still break it up and use the leather for new, smaller, things. And once those things break, too, to the point where the leather can't be reused, you can throw it away, knowing that it will decompose soon, instead of sticking around forever.

And I'm sure there's plenty more things, but it all ends up leading back to money and capitalism. Capitalism tells companies to get money. More money. More money. Get absolutely obscene amounts of money.

and of course the first question that regular people always ask is "but why?" But here's the thing: the "why" isn't important in capitalism. There's no reason behind the hoarding of wealth, because the hoarding of wealth is the reason.

and remember the saying "When the Last Tree Is Cut Down, the Last Fish Eaten, and the Last Stream Poisoned, You Will Realize That You Cannot Eat Money"?

Yeah, capitalism doesn't care about the fact that you're cutting down the last tree, killing the last fish, and poisoning the last stream. As long as you're making money, the damage you're doing is irrelevant. There's no cost too great for making money, as long as that cost isn't money.