#Econ Market Research
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
current frame of mind is i think of everything in stock market terms now. i don’t know jack shit about economics i dont invest in anything but i will be talking about how my stocks are doing all the fucking time. not stocks i own but stocks that are me, the value of the stocks of me the company. which is REALLY funny considering my url here. it’s not just me too if something or someone does well at anything i go OHHHHH X STOCKS ARE SKYROCKETING and if something goes poorly it’s like OHHHHH THE STOCKS ARE PLUMMETING FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY. this is the new it’s jover and we’re so back. this isn’t something that’s gonna catch on though it’ll probably just be this micro joke amongst my friends for a while lol
#i think that thinking of things like stocks is just a joke with myself and with businessverse#i mean like i said i don’t know a lot about econ but i have an interest in it despite being super like anticapitalist#i find systems like that fascinating#there’s a reason why i made the market as a representation and form of worship for the gods in a religion i made#but like a lot of fixations i haven’t actually done a lot of research beyond exploring vibes#i think about economics irl based on how they affect people and control society - i think about how it affects me#and how economic pressures create realities that lead to social movements#the economy isn’t something we keep good at the expense of others if it is harming the public#if it’s harming the public it isn’t a good economy#i don’t think that’s healthy#but like yeah i don’t know the nitty gritty#and yes i think economies can exist and be healthy and lively outside of capitalist tyrany#they always say ‘hey communism means getting rid of any form of an economy’#but like economies are inevitable to society and they have existed wirhout capitalism before#why am i rambling about this#send post#corpus hot take of the day
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
i love content marketing
#i wish i could do a whole masters on it#bcs a masters in marketing is not really the way to go for me i think bcs it’s sooooo econ-focused (sort of)#im like really good at it (sorry) but i do not enjoy it a lot#and i love cs but i hate that it’s so focused on research and behavioural psychology bcs i dont give a smack about either fsjsjsj#i think ill do a cs masters but i wanna learn more about cm
0 notes
Text
Global Wheelchair Market - Forecast 2023-2031
The global Wheelchair Market size was estimated at USD 7.15 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach USD 14.55 billion in 2031 with CAGR 10.6%.
#wheelchair#platonic wheelclair#electric#electric wheelchair market#market research#market insights#Econ Market Reasearch#Econ
1 note
·
View note
Note
hi! did you study linguistics and maths seperately? or as a sort of double major program thing? sounds like a perfect combination btw, what career/research options would it lend itself to? ✨
I did a double major. So it was one degree (i.e. I didn’t go to undergrad twice), but I completed the requirements for a math major and a linguistics major separately. It wasn’t a combined major, which also existed at my school, but not for math/ling. Actually, fun fact, my friend (the “friend who knows econ” that I sometimes mention) did a double major where one of the majors was a combined major, so he got his degree in “economics and math/comp-sci”. Which I always thought was pretty cool.
It was a really great combination IMO, I feel like I kind of... “get it” as a result of studying this particular combination of things in a way that many people do not “get it”. I think both math and linguistics are fields that a little experience with will save you from a lot of meta errors, a lot of fallacious ways of thinking become immediately obvious if you’ve studied one or the other field, so I feel like the combination of the two kind of... helped me avoid a wide swath of types of bad thinking. I think the trifecta for this would be math/linguistics/analytic philosophy, if you spent serious time learning about all those I feel like it would make you into, just, very not-bad thinker. Maybe I should read more analytic philosophy.
Anyway, as for career paths I don’t really know. I mean I’m in grad school for linguistics right now, which is... a career path. But probably becoming an academic is basically a bad idea unless you are crazy. I mean idk. But the job market is just miserable, and the things you’re expected to put up with early in your career seem miserable, it’s something that I’m quite worried about going forward. Right now I’ve just started my grad program though and everything is pretty nice, so I’ll have to report back with first hand experience once I reach the later stages. Other than that, I think I’d be pretty well positioned to do something related to natural language processing or other tech stuff if I could program. I can sort of program but I’m bad at it. I’m slowly working on getting better because it seems like a prerequisite for basically all industry jobs.
But tbh I don’t like programming very much, o think if I had to do it as my day job I would go insane. Probably if academia doesn’t work out I’ll look for something “mathy” in industry that’s not related to any of the stuff I’ve actually been studying. Idk.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Post-Harvest Treatment Market: North America's Dominance and Future Outlook
Introduction:
The post-harvest treatment market has emerged as a critical segment within the agricultural sector, reflecting the increasing global focus on food security and waste reduction. This market encompasses a range of technologies and practices aimed at preserving the quality and extending the shelf life of agricultural produce after harvest.
As of recent analyses, North America has established itself as the dominant region in this market, driven by a combination of advanced technology, substantial investment, and supportive regulatory frameworks.
This article delves into the factors contributing to North America's leadership, the market dynamics, and the future outlook for the post-harvest treatment industry.
Download Free Sample: https://www.nextmsc.com/post-harvest-treatment-market/request-sample
Key Drivers of Market Growth in North America
1. Technological Advancements:
North America, particularly the United States and Canada, is at the forefront of adopting innovative post-harvest technologies. These include advanced storage systems, refrigeration techniques, and sophisticated packaging solutions that reduce spoilage and maintain the nutritional value of produce. Technologies such as controlled atmosphere storage, ethylene inhibitors, and advanced coatings have significantly enhanced the effectiveness of post-harvest treatments.
2. Investment in Research and Development:
The region benefits from substantial investments in research and development (R&D). Public and private sectors invest heavily in developing new technologies and improving existing ones. Leading agricultural research institutions and universities in the United States and Canada play a pivotal role in advancing post-harvest treatment methods. This continuous R&D effort ensures that North America remains at the cutting edge of agricultural technology.
3. Strong Regulatory Frameworks:
North America has well-established regulatory frameworks that support the post-harvest treatment market. Agencies such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) set stringent standards for food safety and quality, encouraging the adoption of best practices in post-harvest handling. These regulations not only protect consumer health but also enhance the marketability of produce, both domestically and internationally.
Inquire Before Buying: https://www.nextmsc.com/post-harvest-treatment-market/inquire-before-buying
4. High Consumer Awareness and Demand for Quality Produce:
Consumers in North America are increasingly aware of food safety and quality issues. There is a growing demand for fresh, high-quality produce that is free from harmful residues and has a longer shelf life. This consumer preference drives producers and retailers to invest in effective post-harvest treatments to meet market expectations.
Market Dynamics and Segmentation
1. Product Segmentation:
The post-harvest treatment market in North America is segmented into several categories based on the type of treatment. These include chemical treatments (e.g., fungicides and ethylene blockers), biological treatments (e.g., biopesticides), and physical treatments (e.g., refrigeration and irradiation). Among these, chemical treatments currently hold the largest market share due to their effectiveness and ease of application. However, there is a noticeable shift towards biological and physical treatments driven by consumer demand for organic and residue-free produce.
2. Application Segmentation:
The market is also segmented based on application, covering fruits, vegetables, and cereals. Fruits and vegetables dominate the market, reflecting their perishable nature and the high value associated with their quality preservation. Within these segments, specific crops such as apples, berries, and leafy greens are significant due to their sensitivity to post-harvest losses and their economic importance.
3. Distribution Channels:
Distribution channels in North America include direct sales to large retailers, sales through distributors, and online sales. The rise of e-commerce and online grocery shopping has added a new dimension to the distribution of post-harvest treated produce, providing opportunities for producers to reach a broader market.
Future Outlook and Challenges
1. Sustainable Practices:
Sustainability is becoming a central focus in the post-harvest treatment market. There is a growing emphasis on reducing the environmental impact of post-harvest treatments. This includes developing eco-friendly chemicals, promoting biological treatments, and optimizing energy use in storage and transportation. Innovations in biodegradable packaging and sustainable refrigeration technologies are expected to gain traction.
2. Integration of IoT and AI:
The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in post-harvest management is set to revolutionize the market. Smart sensors and AI-driven analytics can monitor storage conditions in real-time, predict spoilage, and optimize treatment applications. This technological integration can lead to significant reductions in waste and improvements in efficiency.
3. Global Competition and Trade Policies:
While North America leads the market, it faces competition from other regions such as Europe and Asia-Pacific, where significant advancements are also being made. Trade policies and international agreements will play a crucial role in shaping the future dynamics of the market. North America's ability to maintain its dominance will depend on its adaptability to global market trends and regulatory changes.
4. Addressing Labor Shortages:
Labor shortages in the agricultural sector pose a challenge to the effective implementation of post-harvest treatments. Automation and mechanization in post-harvest processes are essential to mitigate this issue. Investments in automated sorting, grading, and packaging systems will be critical to sustaining market growth.
Conclusion
North America's dominance in the post-harvest treatment market is underpinned by technological innovation, robust regulatory frameworks, and a strong consumer focus on quality and safety. As the market evolves, the region is well-positioned to lead the way in sustainable practices and technological integration.
However, maintaining this leadership will require continuous investment in R&D, adaptability to global trends, and addressing challenges such as labor shortages and environmental sustainability. The future of the post-harvest treatment market in North America looks promising, with potential for significant advancements that will benefit producers, consumers, and the broader agricultural sector.
#post-harvest treatment market#agribusiness#market trends#market analysis#global market#harvest innovations#food and beverage
0 notes
Text
0 notes
Text
Economic Principles Related to Coke
As one of the most common drinks in life, Coke is very popular among people, and our group chose Coke as the theme for our econ live! We found out a lot of interesting economic facts about Coke.
First up, some thoughts on Coke and oligopoly from Zijing Zhu and Annie Yu.
While studying monopolies and oligopolies in class, Zijing and Annie ended up arguing over which is better: Coca-Cola or Pepsi. It's pretty funny, but it seems like everyone has their own preference, right? This debate actually sparked an idea for our project: we're going to explore the oligopoly that these two major beverage companies have created within the everyday beverage industry.
Many of the beverages you buy in life, besides Coca-Cola and Pepsi. In fact, many brands belong to these two companies as well, and for this reason I went to Walmart to do some research. Coca-Cola, Sprite, Fanta, Minute Maid, and Dasani are owned by The Coca-Cola Company, and PepsiCo Company owns the iconic Pepsi-Cola beverages, Mountain Dew beverages, Gatorade Sports Drinks, Lays Potato Chips, and Doritos Tortilla Chips.
An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of dominant firms. Unlike perfect competition, where numerous companies compete for a fraction of the market share, an oligopoly consists of a few large firms that have significant control over price and supply.
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are major players in an oligopolistic market. This means that strategic planning and market maneuvers are crucial, as each company's actions can significantly impact the other's market share and profitability.
Coke and Pepsi have no cooperation because they are in a competitive relationship. To some extent, they are very similar to perfect competition. Coke and Pepsi only have one competitor, so they are very familiar with each other's prices and costs, contributing to enough information for the competition. The consumers are also aware of the two companies’ products and prices, adding information on the consumer side. If one company gets an advantage in production or marketing against the other company, they would profit from the competition. Therefore, the open information market situation of coke like drinks helps forming the competition between the two companies. An elastic demand occurs when the quantity demanded changes significantly in response to a change in price, whereas an inelastic demand occurs when the quantity demanded changes only slightly in response to a change in price. Coke is not like the water needed in daily life. If the price of water suddenly becomes very high, people will still want to spend money to get it because we need to drink water every day. However, coke-like drinks are not demand inelastic like water. If a coke company raises the price very high, no one will buy it. People can choose not to drink coke and substitute to drink juice or other soda. Even if Coke and Pepsi collude like other cartels in oligopolies, they do not gain huge profit due to the very elastic demand of coke-like drinks. Therefore, there is no or less incentives for Coke and Pepsi to collude. Moreover, coke-like drink is an inferior good when compared to other competitors in the drinks market. Both Coke and Pepsi have been accused of being unhealthy, which is why they are developing and producing newer and better goods – variations of coke-like drinks. An inferior good is a type of good for which demand decreases as consumer income increases. As people’s incomes increase, they transition into a healthier lifestyle and are willing to spend more money for the drinks they consume. This aspect of coke-like drinks also prevents Coke and Pepsi to collude because the raise of prices means a loss of target consumer group and a loss of competitive advantage with other choices of drinks.
Marginal Cost in Oligopoly
Coca-Cola production incurs several costs, including raw materials (sugar, flavors), packaging, labor, and manufacturing expenses. Marginal costs may decrease initially due to economies of scale, where average costs fall as production expands. However, beyond a certain point, marginal costs may start to increase if the firm faces capacity constraints or diminishing returns to scale.
Pricing strategy
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo use a differentiated pricing strategy. This means that they set different prices according to the needs of different markets and the purchasing power of consumers. For example, in developed countries, Coca-Cola's price is relatively high because people there are more affluent, while in developing countries, Coca-Cola's price is relatively low to attract more consumers. This fits with our class topic Demand and Supply. The demand-supply curve is different in different markets because the intersection of demand and supply is different. So in order to maximize profits, pricing is different in each country. Considering their oligopoly position in the industry, their pricing will also largely influence the pricing of other brands.
Disadvantages of Oligopoly
1. reduces consumer choice.
2. Cartel behavior reduces competition and may lead to higher prices and reduced output.
3. due to lack of competition, oligopolists may manipulate consumer decisions at will.
4. other firms may not be able to enter the market due to deliberate barriers to entry.
Advantages of oligopoly
1. oligopolies may adopt highly competitive strategies, in which case they can produce with more competitive market structure. This will result in lower prices for consumers.
2.Oligopolies may be more efficient in innovation and in the development of new products and processes. They generate excess profits that can be used for innovation.
3. Price stabilization may bring benefits to consumers and the macroeconomy.
The likes of Coca-Cola and Pepsi have not had a price increase since I was a kid and have always been the cheapest selling beverages in the supermarket as far as I can remember. They also continue to introduce new flavors or healthier zero-sugar versions of their drinks.
Next we present Sihan with some of his insights on Coke and Price elasticity.
If numerous substitutes or copycat alternatives are readily available, an uptick in the price of a specific product will lead to a significant decline in the market demand for that product, as consumers opt to purchase the substitutes instead.
For instance, when the price of Coca-Cola rises, there's typically a significant decrease in the quantity demanded, as many consumers opt for readily available alternatives like Pepsi Cola or Fanta. This shift impacts the slope of the market demand curve.
Graphically, the market demand curve for Coca-Cola appears relatively flat.
When the price of a Coca-Cola rises from $1 to $2 per can, the market demand decreases from 100,000 cans to only 50,000 cans, moving from point B to A along the curve. This decrease represents a halving of demand.
This indicates that market demand is highly responsive or sensitive to changes in price, suggesting that the demand curve is relatively elastic.
Finally, Gino from our group explored the supply and demand of Coke and discovered some interesting economic principles!
Demand Shifts in Coca-Cola's Market
The first graph represents two demand curves for Coca-Cola, D1, and D2, with D2 being to the right of D1, indicating an increase in demand. Several factors could account for this rightward shift; a rise in consumer income (assuming Coca-Cola is a normal good), an increase in the population of consumers, a change in consumer tastes and preferences in favor of Coca-Cola, or a rise in the price of substitute goods, such as Pepsi. Conversely, the curve also shows a potential leftward shift from D1 to D3, signaling a decrease in demand. This could be due to factors like a drop in consumer income, a decrease in population, a change in tastes and preferences away from soda consumption, or a decrease in the price of substitutes.
These shifts in demand demonstrate the law of demand, which states that there is an inverse relationship between the price of a good and the quantity demanded. As the demand curve shifts, it affects the equilibrium price and quantity in the market.
Supply Dynamics in Coca-Cola's Production
The second graph illustrates shifts in the supply curve of Coca-Cola from S1 to S2, and then potentially to S3. The movement from S1 to S2 is an outward or rightward shift, indicating an increase in supply. This can occur due to advancements in technology that improve production efficiency, a decrease in the cost of raw materials, or an increase in the number of suppliers in the market. The curve S3, to the left of S1, represents a decrease in supply, which might be caused by factors such as an increase in the cost of raw materials, natural disasters affecting production facilities, or government regulations.
The supply curve illustrates the law of supply, stating that there is a direct relationship between the price of a good and the quantity supplied, assuming other factors remain constant. Supply shifts lead to changes in the market equilibrium and have implications for Coca-Cola's pricing strategy.
Market Equilibrium and Elasticity
The intersection of the supply and demand curves determines the market equilibrium. The steepness or flatness of these curves is indicative of elasticity. If Coca-Cola's demand is price elastic, consumers are very responsive to price changes. However, if demand is price inelastic, as might be suggested by strong brand loyalty, consumers are less responsive to price changes. The same applies to supply elasticity; if Coca-Cola's supply is elastic, the company can easily adjust production in response to price changes.
Group members:
Zijing Zhu(#27149994)
Annie Yu(#35241664)
Sihan Chen(#25207808)
Gino Gu(#52086792)
A huge shoutout to our panelists for rocking it with their awesome commitment!
1 note
·
View note
Text
I often hesitate to write or speak on certain topics. Either because they are out of my wheelhouse, or I have not done sufficient research or there are too many stakeholders already advocating. My opinion is meaningless. On the topic of the farmers protest I now feel compelled to speak. Also because we have ancestral land there. Food, clothing, shelter, energy, peace, security. The hallmarks of a flourishing society.
The bread basket of India.
In a free market system, with adequate insurance for crop yields, and enforceable water rights, environmental regulations, you'd think the farmers of India would be flourishing proudly feeding 1.4 billion people.
This is forced extraction into a nothing economy. The math makes no sense
0 notes
Text
Mister 1000% ROI
Bruce M Firestone, PhD, and Andrew L Firestone, BA (Econ)
Any time someone offers you investments with returns of 1000% per year, you are right to be skeptical, but this is what Australian economist “Mr 1000%” Andrew Firestone has been working on for a number of years now. He reckons he will be able to present how households can add an equivalent of $60,000 to $70,000 AUD to their annual income with some fairly simple approaches he has studied and researched. These are activities with a very high return on their labor, capital, time and sweat equity inputs. I told him about the tiny house movement philosophy of “less house, more life” and he loved that idea, his tag line is “Better Income – Better Life,” a similar pattern.
But wait, it gets better. Like veg-o-matic, K-tel direct-marketing TV pitchmen of the 1960s whose mantra was, “It slices! It dices!” you pay no income tax on these earnings.
The Veg-o-matic
Huh? How is that even possible?
First, let’s work through the 1000% ROI number then deal with personal tax issues.
Full of Beans Case Study
Some years ago, Andrew purchased a pack of bean seeds for $3.50 that produced 250 grams per week of the sweetest freshest beans you can find anywhere; this went on for nine months in Canberra where he lives with his family[2]. The Canberra area has a relatively dry climate with warm to hot summers and cool winters. Elevation about sea-level is around 580-meters (1,900-feet) and you can see snow in the foothills around the capital city of Australia from time-to-time.
To keep them producing, Andrew staggers his planting. He then harvested seeds from his best producers to use for the next year (this will become important later).
Over the year, his bean yield was around 9 kilograms (nearly 20-pounds), which (as of 2021) retailed at $3.90 per kg in-store or $35.10 for his 9 kg. Now estimating his ROI is simple arithmetic—
ROI = ($35.10 - $3.50)/$3.50 = 903%
So, not quite a 1000% return, but getting close with two other key factors still to consider. It might be useful to note that a quick online search of bean prices today (circa 2024) shows much higher prices per kg for beans, ie, $11[3]! Now that’s inflation for you… And don’t forget—since Andrew’s bean seeds are now free, his ROI is currently infinite.
“But whoa, hold your horses[4],” you say. The above calculation doesn’t factor in the cost of Andrew’s labor, right?
Marble Bust of Homer
That’s true. It doesn’t. But it also doesn’t yet take into account taxes. For Andrew, the labor cost to add would be the income he could otherwise earn. But he is on a fixed salary and picking up a part-time job would be impractical. So, the real alternative is Andrew sitting in front of his TV for nine months instead of experiencing shinrin-yoku (the Japanese term for forest bathing), one could argue that his cost of labor is zero or even negative since gardening can be a positive health event, providing both exercise and mental well-being. Plus, how much work is involved? Very, very little, he informs us.
Practising forest bathing in Japan[6]
When he lived with his family in a small townhome, he was able to sneak his seeds into a tiny and neglected patch out front and just put the water to them; he used a bunch of weeds he removed from the scrubby yard as mulch. In the photos below you will also see a mandarin seedling he put in as well.
Andrew’s sneaky, puncy townhouse microgarden: YUMMY
What about income tax?
Well, the beauty of self-production is you don't pay any. If Andrew could have worked extra hours to buy his beans, he would have to pay income tax on that income before he was allowed to go ahead and spend it. There are a couple of ways to think about tax. Firstly, if he was to go out and earn the extra, he'd lose close to half of that marginal income to taxation, so the beans would really have cost at retail (back in 2021) about $70 in after-tax income[7]. Or if he was just using his regular work income, he would lose on average 25% of that so his beans would have really cost $46.80.
He tells me, he sees this pattern over and over again with home-based production. There are some less good returns, growing watermelons or pumpkins, for instance, but many traditional pastimes such as gardening, sewing, home preserving, brewing, etc will likely hit the 1000% mark.
In fact, Andrew calculates, a household could make the equivalent of $60,000 to $70,000 worth of taxable income (but, in fact, not subject to tax) at home per year doing these sorts of tasks!
Gender roles
As far back as the early 1980s, researchers noted that, “Women do two-thirds of the world's working hours but receive only one tenth of the income and own one hundredth of the property[8].” But this need no longer be the case—traditional crafts are being rediscovered and families are making many of them “team sports.” Things on the following list are now being done by all—
home cooking/baking,
child minding,
dressmaking,
tailoring,
networking/sourcing/bartering[9],
yogurt making,
woodworking[10]/furniture production,
cakemaking,
candle making,
gardening (aka backyard homesteading),
cheese making,
beer brewing,
raising backyard chickens and/or ducks,
planting and harvesting fruit trees,
knitting,
load shifting—adding solar panels with battery storage[11],
clotheslines,
paying off your mortgage as quickly as possible[12],
hunting large game with old trucks in national parks (maybe 😊)
beautifying property with large shrubs/trees/creating a food forest[13]
retrofitting roof insulation where standards are poor[14]
Vertical urban farms
Andrew is also skeptical about the economics of vertical farming (as well as the lack of nutrition in they produce). And he is not alone[15].
He writes—
At the very least, vertical farming has to be direct to consumer but having the word “selling” in there is going to make it tough—all the regulatory issues, packaging, and taxes and other charges will likely kill them. They would have to be like strawberry farms back in the day: Give customers a basket and let them pick their own; the operator just weighs it at the register. But I can't see how that very, very, very expensive capital could ever pay for itself and the maintenance costs on those systems will be extreme. You have mineral rich water flowing through small pipes and pumps; it’ll be a clogging nightmare. You will have major condensation issues and molds will grow plus all sorts of ventilation problems. These can't be magically solved. They’ll need expensive energy and capital systems to deal with it. And in terms of this being “green,” not at all! These systems use steel and glass, and they are hugely energy intensive to make and run. There is no way to make that energy back over their economic lifetime. This is just some feel-good greenwashing.
By the way, you can make super cheap dome greenhouses using plastic sheeting and poly pipes that would have much less environmental impact. But places like Canada and the US Midwest aren’t ever going have economic, full-on heated greenhouses. If they go the cheap poly dome route and get more out of their shoulder seasons (that is, forgetting about December to February periods), they have a shot to make local produce work (better). Residents should simply put a bunch of raised garden beds with domes in their existing backyards over a weekend for something like $100 bucks.
Beautiful Legs Case Study
Andrew went hunting for a nice dining room table—one with actual real wood. Retail prices for this sort of thing were around $2,400 AUD at the time with a manufacturer’s rebate (coupon) available of $300[16] so a net effective price of $2,100. Thinking of proving his point once more about 1000% ROI being widely available but little known, he purchased 2 pairs of steel table legs for $85 and scrounged around for some old wooden planks, which he paid $105 for and set about doing some home woodworking himself. Again, his ROI is simple arithmetic—
pair of steel legs $85.00
solid wood planks $105.00
total cost (home-based) $190.00
retail price $2,100.00
margin $1,910.00
ROI 1005%
E&OE
This did take him a while to complete so you might want to factor that in, but frankly, when returns are likely measured in triple digits or quadruple ones, you can stop measuring.
Bruce M Firestone, [email protected] Andrew L Firestone, [email protected]
COPYRIGHT, BRUCE M FIRESTONE, OTTAWA CANADA AND ANDREW L FIRESTONE, CANBERRA AUSTRALIA 2024.
+++
[1] Image source, BitBytes - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=93170611.
[2] In a cold northern shelf city like Canada’s Capital City (Ottawa), you would probably get six months and then only if you start your seedlings inside.
[3] For example, check out the price of Miss Melons fresh beans here, https://www.missmelons.com.au/products/beans.
[4] By the way, it was Homer not an American cowboy who first used this expression, Hold your horses—it was in book 23 of the Iliad.
[5] Image source, Originally from en.wikipedia; description page is/was here. Original uploader was JW1805 at en.wikipedia, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2171360.
[6] Image source, Teamsamuraispain - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=43516357.
[7] Bear in mind you don't compare your homegrown product against the cheapest produce available, but rather the freshest and best versions. When looking for crops to grow, probably best to focus on high nutrient and relatively high-cost foods.
[8] Said then President of the Canadian International Development Agency (Marcel Masse) in 1982, https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/07/06/Women-do-two-thirds-of-the-worlds-working-hours-but/9167394776000/.
[9] Historically, women were (are) balancing out equity across communities and sharing useful information more widely. For example, a homemaker learns that a neighbor needs to clean out their stables. Next, the homemaker’s life partner helps muck out the stables and, in return, they receive a free load of manure for their backyard homestead garden. This networking/socializing is crucial in a tax-free, bartering-based, local economy...
[10] Think woodworking is one of humanity’s older art forms and that traditional skillsets have been (mostly) developed in the time period covered by recorded history (around 10,000 years)? Not so. Read this article about a recent archaeological discovery in Zambia of a log platform or shelter constructed 476,000 years ago by stone-age people. Some type of hominid accomplished this feat including notching the logs to make a better fit/stronger structure, https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66846772. The BBC article is based on a paper published in the Nature journal, Evidence for the earliest structural use of wood at least 476,000 years ago, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06557-9.
[11] Unfortunately, according to a CSIRO study, solar hot water does not produce the desired ROI.
[12] Apparently, paying off your car loan early is not important, probably because cars are, for the most part, a depreciating asset.
[13] Tree planting improves property values by about 6%, provides shade, cooling, and wind protection, as well as fresh air. Combining that with a food forest increases ROI further…
[14] Returns of about 40% for your roof, 20% for walls and 5% for floors.
[15] For example, refer to: Vertical Farming Has Found Its Fatal Flaw, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/vertical-farms-energy-crisis.
[16] Car/boat/RV (caravan)/truck manufacturers have been using this “charade” for a long time. Here’s how it works—their distributors/dealers/shops sell Jane and John a car/boat/RV/caravan/truck/piece of furniture/whatever for $5,000. There is also a separate coupon which promises them a 15% manufacturer’s rebate (ie, $750) later on… Now, Jane and John aren’t rich dudes, so they finance (say) 100% of their purchase with some kind of a buy-now-pay-later lender. The lender sees they paid $5,000 so they lend John and Jane $5,000. But the manufacturer subsequently snail mails a check/cheque to John and Jane or otherwise reimburses them for their coupon in the amount of $750. Presto magic, John and Jane have their new car/boat/RV/caravan/truck/piece of furniture/whatever plus they also have $750 in cash now. What’s interesting about this is that the $750 cash back is not considered income in the hands of John and Jane, so they don’t have to pay any personal income tax on it. For the manufacturer, it’s an allowable expense (reduction in their income) so it too lowers their overall tax burden. Of course, John and Jane are now on the hook for repayment of $5,000 plus interest. But most people, especially young people and entrepreneurs of any age, have very high personal future discount rates so cash-in-hand might look good compared with a future payment plan of some sort.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Revolutionizing Radiance: The Unveiling of a Paradigm-Defining Era in the Hyaluronic Acid Market
Today marks a watershed moment in the realm of skincare and beauty as Econ Market Research, a trailblazing leader in innovative solutions, announces its groundbreaking strides in the Hyaluronic Acid Market. With an unwavering commitment to redefining radiance and reimagining skincare, Econ Market Research is poised to usher in a new era of beauty with its avant-garde contributions to the ever-evolving landscape of hyaluronic acid
Request For Sample Report: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-sample/EMR00449/
Unrivaled Expertise and Pioneering Formulations: At the intersection of science and luxury, Econ Market Research stands as a beacon of innovation, fusing cutting-edge research with a passion for transformative skincare. Our team of experts, comprised of industry luminaries and visionaries, has meticulously crafted formulations that harness the full potential of hyaluronic acid. Through rigorous testing and a dedication to excellence, we have developed products that not only meet but exceed the expectations of discerning consumers.
Elevating Elegance: A Symphony of Science and Style Beyond the science, Econ Market Research elevates the entire skincare experience. Our products are not just efficacious; they are an embodiment of elegance. From the sleek, sustainable packaging to the ethereal textures that caress the skin, every facet of our offerings is designed to evoke a sense of luxury. We believe that skincare is not just a routine; it is a ritual, and our products are an invitation to indulge in moments of self-care.
Ask For Discount: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-discount/EMR00449/
Sustainability at the Core: In our pursuit of excellence, Econ Market Research remains steadfast in its commitment to environmental responsibility. Our hyaluronic acid formulations are not only designed to enhance natural beauty but also to harmonize with nature. We prioritize sustainability at every stage of our production process, from ethically sourced ingredients to eco-friendly packaging. With Econ Market Research, beauty is not just skin deep; it resonates with a deeper commitment to the planet.
Global Reach, Local Impact: As we unveil our revolutionary products, Econ Market Research is not just introducing skincare; we are catalyzing a movement. With a global vision, we aim to empower individuals worldwide to embrace their unique beauty. Simultaneously, we recognize the importance of local communities. Econ Market Research is dedicated to creating opportunities and making a positive impact on the communities we touch, ensuring that our success resonates with social responsibility.
Keyplayers:
Anika Therapeutics Inc. (U.S.)
Bio Plus Co. Ltd. (South Korea)
Bohus Biotech AB (Sweden)
Bioxis Pharmaceuticals (France)
Candela Medical (U.S.)
Galderma Laboratories L.P. (U.S.)
Genzyme Corp. (U.S.)
Laboratoires Vivacy (France).
Global Hyaluronic Acid report segmentation
By Grade
Cosmetic Grade
Pharmaceutical Grade
Food Grade
By End Users
Pharmaceutical Industry
Cosmetic Surgery Centers
Dermatology Clinics
Food Industry
Personal Care
By Application
Aesthetics
Osteoarthritis
Cosmetic
Dietary Supplements
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
Ophthalmology
Gate more Report: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/industry-report/hyaluronic-acid-market/
0 notes
Text
Revolutionizing Radiance: The Unveiling of a Paradigm-Defining Era in the Hyaluronic Acid Market
Today marks a watershed moment in the realm of skincare and beauty as Econ Market Research, a trailblazing leader in innovative solutions, announces its groundbreaking strides in the Hyaluronic Acid Market. With an unwavering commitment to redefining radiance and reimagining skincare, Econ Market Research is poised to usher in a new era of beauty with its avant-garde contributions to the ever-evolving landscape of hyaluronic acid
Request For Sample Report: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-sample/EMR00449/
Unrivaled Expertise and Pioneering Formulations: At the intersection of science and luxury, Econ Market Research stands as a beacon of innovation, fusing cutting-edge research with a passion for transformative skincare. Our team of experts, comprised of industry luminaries and visionaries, has meticulously crafted formulations that harness the full potential of hyaluronic acid. Through rigorous testing and a dedication to excellence, we have developed products that not only meet but exceed the expectations of discerning consumers.
Elevating Elegance: A Symphony of Science and Style Beyond the science, Econ Market Research elevates the entire skincare experience. Our products are not just efficacious; they are an embodiment of elegance. From the sleek, sustainable packaging to the ethereal textures that caress the skin, every facet of our offerings is designed to evoke a sense of luxury. We believe that skincare is not just a routine; it is a ritual, and our products are an invitation to indulge in moments of self-care.
Ask For Discount: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-discount/EMR00449/
Sustainability at the Core: In our pursuit of excellence, Econ Market Research remains steadfast in its commitment to environmental responsibility. Our hyaluronic acid formulations are not only designed to enhance natural beauty but also to harmonize with nature. We prioritize sustainability at every stage of our production process, from ethically sourced ingredients to eco-friendly packaging. With Econ Market Research, beauty is not just skin deep; it resonates with a deeper commitment to the planet.
Global Reach, Local Impact: As we unveil our revolutionary products, Econ Market Research is not just introducing skincare; we are catalyzing a movement. With a global vision, we aim to empower individuals worldwide to embrace their unique beauty. Simultaneously, we recognize the importance of local communities. Econ Market Research is dedicated to creating opportunities and making a positive impact on the communities we touch, ensuring that our success resonates with social responsibility.
Keyplayers:
Anika Therapeutics Inc. (U.S.)
Bio Plus Co. Ltd. (South Korea)
Bohus Biotech AB (Sweden)
Bioxis Pharmaceuticals (France)
Candela Medical (U.S.)
Galderma Laboratories L.P. (U.S.)
Genzyme Corp. (U.S.)
Laboratoires Vivacy (France).
Global Hyaluronic Acid report segmentation
By Grade
Cosmetic Grade
Pharmaceutical Grade
Food Grade
By End Users
Pharmaceutical Industry
Cosmetic Surgery Centers
Dermatology Clinics
Food Industry
Personal Care
By Application
Aesthetics
Osteoarthritis
Cosmetic
Dietary Supplements
Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient
Ophthalmology
Gate more Report: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/industry-report/hyaluronic-acid-market/
0 notes
Text
0 notes
Text
Revolutionizing Connectivity: Private LTE Market Surges Ahead with Remarkable Growth and Innovation
The global Private LTE market is experiencing unprecedented growth, driven by recent developments, innovative applications, and a surge in demand for advanced connectivity solutions. As the industry continues to evolve, it is marked by significant trends, expanding market size, and a diverse range of applications and products that redefine the landscape of wireless communication.
Major players in the market include:
ATANDT
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM
VODAFONE GROUP
TELEFONICA
NOKIA
ERICSSON
HUAWEI
ZTE CORP
CISCO CORPORATION
Free Sample Copy of This Report at: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-sample/EMR0024
Recent Developments:
The Private LTE market has witnessed a series of groundbreaking developments, reflecting the industry's commitment to innovation and excellence. Companies are investing in cutting-edge technologies to enhance network capabilities, security, and overall performance. Recent partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions have further propelled the market forward, fostering collaboration and synergy among key players.
One notable development is the integration of advanced security protocols, ensuring that Private LTE networks remain resilient against evolving cyber threats. This commitment to cybersecurity is a testament to the industry's dedication to providing reliable and secure communication solutions.
Market Size and Trends:
The Private LTE market has experienced robust growth, with a notable increase in market size over the past year. This surge is attributed to the rising demand for high-performance, low-latency connectivity across various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, logistics, and smart cities.
Key trends shaping the market include the adoption of Industry 4.0, which leverages Private LTE to enable seamless communication between devices, leading to increased efficiency and productivity. Additionally, the deployment of Private LTE networks for mission-critical applications underscores the reliability and stability of this technology in demanding environments.
Ask For Discount: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/request-discount/EMR0024
Application & Product Insights:
Private LTE's versatility is evident in its diverse applications across industries. From enabling real-time communication in smart factories to supporting connected healthcare solutions, Private LTE is at the forefront of digital transformation. The integration of IoT devices, smart sensors, and autonomous systems is driving the need for scalable and reliable connectivity, positioning Private LTE as the preferred solution.
Product innovation remains a key driver in the market, with a focus on developing user-friendly, scalable, and cost-effective solutions. The advent of compact and powerful Private LTE infrastructure and devices opens up new possibilities for businesses looking to enhance their connectivity infrastructure.
Get Full Information: https://www.econmarketresearch.com/industry-report/private-lte-market/
Segmentations
By Component
INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES
By Technology
FDD
TDD
By Deployement Model
CENTRALIZED
DISTRIBUTED
By Frequency Band
Licensed
Unlicensed
Shared Spectrum
R. Analysis:
A comprehensive analysis of the Private LTE market reveals a landscape ripe with opportunities. Regional dynamics, regulatory frameworks, and the competitive landscape play pivotal roles in shaping the market trajectory. Strategic partnerships and collaborations are emerging as key strategies for companies to gain a competitive edge, foster innovation, and expand their market presence.
As the Private LTE market continues to evolve, it is poised to become an integral part of the global connectivity ecosystem, providing tailored solutions to meet the unique needs of businesses and industries worldwide.
About Us:
Econ Market Research is an all-inclusive resource for providing useful insight gleaned through industry research. Through our syndicated and consulting research services, we assist our clients in finding solutions to their research needs. Industries including semiconductor and electronics, aerospace and defence, automobiles and transportation, healthcare, manufacturing and construction, media and technology, chemicals, and materials are among our areas of expertise.
Contact Us:
Econ Market Research Private Limited.
E-mail:[email protected]
Phone: +1 812 506 4440
Website: — Https://Www.Econmarketresearch.Com
Connect with us at LinkedIn | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube
0 notes