#DoubleStandard

[youngtreetheorist]

People need to stop comparing Drake Bell to Brian Peck—they are not the same. Drake didn’t commit the same crimes as Brian. Drake received more punishment for sending a message, and while he should have been more professional and responsible, the fact that he blocked the person after finding out her real age shows he had no predatory intentions.

It feels like the media and social media are protecting Brian Peck. Why attack Drake over a text message while protecting someone like Brian Peck, who harmed numerous children? This double standard doesn’t make sense.

[renegadeurbanmediasource]

Lol! The Majority isn’t used to this. They’re used to DEATH and DESTRUCTION at will! So used to doing anything and everything and not even receiving a stern talking to from Mr. Brady or Mr. Drummond! Lol!

[insepcteurmanioc-blog]

Hypocrites

[tik4tatthetat]

The Double Standard of Justice: Why American Politicians Often Escape Accountability

The Double Standard of Justice: Why American Politicians Often Escape Accountability

In the United States, a disturbing trend has emerged where politicians are frequently held to a different standard of justice than ordinary citizens. Despite committing crimes that would warrant severe penalties for regular individuals, politicians often receive lenient sentences, plea deals, or even complete impunity. This disparity is particularly egregious when it comes to severe offenses like sexual assault, theft, discrimination, abuse of power, and criminal and civil crimes. One primary reason for this double standard is the influence of power and privilege. Politicians, particularly those in high-ranking positions, possess significant sway over the legal system, law enforcement, and the media. This enables them to leverage their connections and resources to mitigate consequences, silence whistleblowers, and shape public perception. Another factor contributing to the leniency towards politicians is the complexity of the legal system. Laws and regulations governing political conduct often contain loopholes, ambiguities, and exemptions that allow politicians to exploit technicalities and avoid accountability. Additionally, the slow pace of investigations and prosecutions can lead to public fatigue, reducing pressure on authorities to take decisive action. The role of money and campaign financing also plays a significant part in shielding politicians from justice. Wealthy donors and special interest groups often provide financial support to politicians, creating a sense of obligation and reciprocity. This can lead to favorable treatment, reduced scrutiny, and even outright immunity from prosecution. Furthermore, the politicization of the justice system has resulted in a lack of independence and impartiality. Prosecutors, judges, and law enforcement officials may feel pressure to prioritize political considerations over the pursuit of justice, particularly when dealing with high-profile cases involving politicians. The consequences of this double standard are far-reaching and corrosive. It erodes trust in institutions, perpetuates a culture of impunity, and undermines the rule of law. When politicians are not held accountable for their actions, it sends a message that they are above the law, emboldening them to engage in further wrongdoing and abuse of power. To address this issue, it is essential to implement reforms that promote transparency, accountability, and equal justice under the law. This can be achieved through measures such as: - Strengthening campaign finance regulations and disclosure requirements - Enhancing whistleblower protections and encouraging reporting of misconduct - Implementing independent oversight bodies and special prosecutors for political cases - Closing legal loopholes and clarifying laws governing political conduct - Increasing public engagement and scrutiny of political actions and investigations

Ultimately, the double standard of justice must be confronted and dismantled to restore faith in the US legal system and ensure that all individuals, regardless of status or position, are held equally accountable for their actions.

"The old saying 'you can't outrun time' appears to have been turned on its head, as many older millennials, Gen Xers, and Baby Boomers have seemingly given American politicians a free pass, allowing them to dodge accountability with ease." May the universe help us.

tik4tat research team, 9/2024 Read the full article

[timelordclothing]

http://dlvr.it/TBVYCj

[usnewsper-politics]

Feminist Groups' Response to Hamas Attack Exposes Double Standard #doublestandard #feministgroups #feministmovement #Hamasattack #responsetoterrorattack

[girlactionfigure]

muslim_zionist18

BBC is a complete piece of shit, this is clearly a appreciation for the Hamas. How world is okay with October 7th, where Jews were murdered, raped and kidnapped. And still 101 hostages are captivity of Hamas which not terrorist according to BBC.

[getae-radfem]

[the-most-humble-blog]

When Men Stand on Business: Why Certain Segments Turn Feral and Misandrist

Standards, Respect, and the Double Standard Circus

Let’s get one thing straight: having standards as a heterosexual man is not an act of aggression. It’s a basic human right. Yet, the moment men start drawing boundaries or—heaven forbid—voicing their standards, certain segments of society (you know who you are 👀) start frothing at the mouth like a 2003 internet forum caught in a flame war. Why? Because some people have been conditioned to see men as providers, protectors, and silent sacrificers—but not decision-makers.

Well, newsflash: men are allowed to have standards too.

Standards Are Not Misogyny

Let’s address the big elephant in the room: having standards ≠ hating women. If a man decides he wants:

A partner who values loyalty,

Someone who prioritizes emotional maturity over Instagram likes,

Or just someone who doesn’t treat their relationship like a TikTok content generator,

...why does that spark an apocalypse of rage and accusations of being controlling, toxic, or—everyone’s favorite buzzword—misogynistic?

Ask yourself this: if it’s empowering for women to demand “a man who makes six figures, is 6’4”, emotionally intelligent, great in bed, and can recite poetry while doing a backflip,” why does it suddenly become "oppression" when a man wants a partner who doesn’t treat commitment like an afterthought?

The Misandry Playbook

Here’s where it gets spicy: when men dare to stand on business, certain segments of the crowd will hit you with:

Gaslighting 101: “Wow, you’re so insecure if you care about stuff like that.”

Shame Grenades: “Only a weak man feels the need to have standards. A real man accepts anything.”

Projection Olympics: “You just want a submissive maid, don’t you?”

**Name-Calling: "When logic is refuted or falls on intellectually deaf ears, insults become the tool of the emotional, hysterical, and emotionally unstable."

The irony? These are often the same people who post things like, “Know your worth, sis,” on social media while belittling anyone else for doing the same.

Why It's Time to Dish It Back

Here’s the truth: you can’t play defense forever. If certain people feel emboldened to call men trash for expressing their preferences, then it’s time for men to:

Be unapologetic. You don’t owe anyone an explanation for your boundaries.

Dish it back—tastefully but firmly. Call out the hypocrisy. Example: “So if you wouldn’t date someone broke, why is it wrong for me to avoid drama queens, 304's, and independent feminists?”

Stop pandering. Being agreeable at all costs isn’t “nice,” it’s self-destructive, and diminishes a man's status among other men.

Respect should go both ways, and if someone’s going feral over the idea of mutual standards, that’s their problem, not yours.

Let’s Not Pretend This is Fair

The moment you flip the script, watch how the conversation devolves:

"Who hurt you?"

"Not all women are like that!"

"You just hate women because you can’t get one!"

Oh, the classic ad hominem Olympics. These are tactics used to derail a conversation instead of addressing the real issue: standards are universal.

Final Truth Bomb

The simple truth is, a man who knows what he wants and sets boundaries isn’t toxic—he’s dangerous. Dangerous to the status quo, dangerous to complacency, and dangerous to the idea that men should just shut up and take whatever comes their way. So to those turning feral at the mere thought of men holding themselves to a standard, here’s a revolutionary concept: respect goes both ways.

Like, share, or watch me get cancelled for saying this: Certain people (you know who you are) will weaponize this truth bomb faster than you can say 'misandry.' They'll screenshot, twist, and predictably call me toxic—proving my point in real-time. Don't let 'em win.

[1d10tch1ld]

"It's fetishizations, your watering-down names!!" I am on the verge of another breakdown. Apparently I am never "pure" enough, just being white is "dirty".

I am sick of trans people divide themselves, and as a trans person I am sick of everyone assuming I am a bad person. it's bad enough that I get it from being trans, but apparently if your white and choose a non-Hebrew name your racist. Hebrew names derive from the bible, especially the Jewish bible, and there are barely even any "White" names as in AMERICA/BRITIAN. Also p.s. I deal with obsessive thoughts, and I am not in a good mental state so I am sorry if I accidentally offend people but calling someone "watering down" culture as in understanding the meaning and importance's behind a name is awful to say.

White people with names depriving from Asia are also likely to be targeted, and aren't the ones mocking Asian names. I, myself, don't have a chosen name really. I jump from name to name, but I am not going to sit there and shame someone for their chosen name. It's a similar thing to be kicking the enbies to the ground for choosing the name Arson. Despite that also being controversial, and the stereotype was always a skinny white "woman"/AFAB person to choose that name. People aren't trying to offend anyone over their names even if they did, stop making excuse to not give your child an Asian name if your so urged to gatekeep them. And also there are trans people who are half white/half asian (WASIAN!) who don't need people to mock them for both being Asian and using an Asian name as a half white person.

Even if you were to disagree how is it not racist to say someone is "watering" down your culture by participating or living in an Asian country. Everyone assumes you would immediately come from a western European country if your white, and trans but that isn't the case for everyone. A similar tactic has been used by Asian people to say they can't wear Kimono's or such.

[renegadeurbanmediasource]

Yet we're not supposed to recognize this or say anything. Wypipo act so damn superior! All the crap they've done to the world? Are you serious?

[rainrein]

reading acomaf out of curiosity (i actually did enjoy acotar the first book but uh. lets say my opinion is going Down) and well. rhysand sending feyre into a place that he does not tell her virtually any information about and leaves her on her own to get killed/injured/kidnapped or WORSE....? cmon man

[hyacinthsdiamonds]

Seeing the same people who perpetuated or sent vicious misogynistic hate to Hannah Schmitz, as well as disgusting racist abuse towards Yuki and Alex because of FUCKING CONSPIRACY THEORIES and those who just straight up ignored it, now up in arms regarding whatever the fuck is going on between the FIA and the wolffs is beginning to piss me off. Because now that it's not someone red bull affiliated involved, it's somehow now unacceptable.

[becca4leafclover]

I could write an essay on how the MCRP community fundamentally screws over pixel skin artists

I hate sitting in like 4 different corners and feeling like NO ONE actually cares about my work

[morihaus]

can i just say alduin's name sucks so bad as a retconned dragon name. like it was never meant to mean something like that, it was made up way before dovahzul. but having to shoehorn it in, comparing him with other dragons... he just sucks. look how short his name is. his brother is named parthurnax which has so many more interesting letters in it. alduin's name doesnt look like 3 compound words its just a name. i think he could just do better than that

[usnewsper-politics]

Feminist Groups' Response to Hamas Attack Exposes Double Standard #doublestandard #feministgroups #feministmovement #Hamasattack #responsetoterrorattack