#Diehardpizzer | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

aidenknow · 4 months ago

Text

Aiden’s Response towards the Grooming Allegations

There have been posts going around in the OFF game tag and its variants by a user named @diehardpizzer (AKA @molochzmeat (formerly @diehardpizzer)/@molochsden (formerly @doodlefortress)), who started spreading posts of accusations toward me (and my other friends) of allegations such as stalking, harassment, grooming, lying etc. For this post, I am going to make a response to the case regarding the grooming accusations. The reasons I focus on this specific allegation first is because 1.) Fort often uses this accusation to deflect their offence after they were exposed for lesbiphobia, transphobia, racism, talking over minorities, ableism, and also grooming, stalking, harassment and mocking of someone’s suicide and there are instances that they still keep doing with that behaviour even after being criticized, 2.) some of the information on the accusations are taken out of context or given with improper or no explanation. This leads to more harm than good not only to me but also to other people, both directly and indirectly

First and foremost, the reason I do not want to resolve with Fortress is because of their behaviour. They have repeatedly been shown to be aggressive and manipulative towards anyone who is not aligned with their ideals or anyone who goes against them. They also twist other people’s words and situations, whether it’s in situations they were involved in or not, through accusations without proper evidence or evidence that has been taken out of context. They would also throw people under the bus with hypocritical accusations towards people who disagree with them. They aren’t a good person to make proper arguments or reasoning with, let alone the fact that this person is a blatant liar that makes poorly written arguments.

I was recently getting stalked and harrassed by Fort (and they still do along with stalking and putting unnecessary accusations towards a minor) after I vented regarding the misinformation and the negligence in Fort’s part of accusing me and my friends, especially with the mentions of my late friend’s suicide and disrespecting his death. Many people have advised me to not interact and instead block them, which I did especially due to the rise of their stalking and hostile behaviour from them. And with that, I will block them immediately if they ever interact with my posts including their multiple alt accounts. No hesitation. They have already disrespected my boundaries despite the fact they are included in my DNI list, and they are doing this out of malice and spite as they admitted to it.

Secondly, please read this post thoroughly and take this information I provided based on your judgement once you finish reading the whole post. Necessary questions that need clarifications are appreciated. Unwanted comments of insult and harassment will be NOT be tolerated.

Lastly, I am not fluent in English, so expect some grammatical errors and poorly worded sentences. However, I will keep my words formally and professionally to ensure credibility while trying to keep my words clear and concise. Additionally, I asked a few people to proofread this response, specifically people who were either witnesses or aware of what happened during the incident.

There are two allegations that I am going to clarify and debunk which will be explained under the cut

TW for mentions of grooming and suicide

Allegation #1: Sending NSFW art to a minor

I had already talked and debunked this allegation last year from this post. However, I am going to bring it back as I am planning to further explain the situation based on this allegation while also criticizing the person who originally accused me with this allegation.

Before this happened, I was planning to share art (that my friend shared with me in DMs) with the server and I was unsure whether or not it was appropriate to share it (the art in question is 2 men making out on the floor with one being clothed while the other is in boxer pants, because that character is Boxxer) since the server had become strict in terms of sharing artwork. I deemed it as suggestive but leaned towards SFW only because of the sounds they made while making out (breathing and giggling only, no moaning). I mentioned it in the server regarding the art and 2 adults asked me to send the art that I hesitated to send in the server to their DMs to check. The 15-year-old was present at the time to ask me for the art too. However, I nodded a yes only to the 2 adults who wanted to see it, the minor’s request on the other hand was ignored.

The image that is being shown is the evidence that had been spread around publicly. The one being spread around did not do the name censoring properly so I did the name censoring via colour coding. The user in white is a 15-year-old while the users in purple and red one are the adults

The two images shown above are cropped to clarify who were the people I was referring to when I accepted the request to send it to their DMs

These screenshots were taken by a friend who still remains in the server even after it was closed down. To the people wondering who are the people uncensored here, EitoFZ is Eito, who was the person marked in red, Ms. Know-It-All is me (AidenKnow), and 🥞 is Brass who is marked in purple. The only user that remains censored is the 15-year-old. The reason I left the others uncensored will be explained later

When I said “Alrighty” to the 15-year-old, I only agreed on the idea of sending the art to the DMs and spoiling the picture. It does not mean that I am accepting to share the art with the minor. I said this because I suspect that there was a possibility that someone untrustworthy (who is still in the server since the server is closed and inactive but not deleted) will screenshot some of the messages and take some of it out of context without proof

Let’s compare the DMs I had with the 15-year-old VS the DMs I had with the 2 adults (Eito and Brass). Focus on the dates of the DMs in the screenshots taken by me

Here are the screenshots of the DMs between me and the 15-year-old to prove that I did not send the art to them. The context of the DMs is not significant for this allegation, however I may or may not talk about it regarding the context in the future posts

No message deletion took place in the DMs since me and the 15-year-old rarely talked in the DMs and were only active in the servers we were in. The only dates shown in the DMs were 16th March and 16th May which were the only dates that were between the incident where they took place. If there is proof where message deletion took place, there should have been responses from her, yet this is not the case as it never happened

And here are the screenshots of the DMs between me and the 2 adults (Eito and Brass respectively)

Yes, this was the art that people were calling “NSFW”, when in actuality it is not NSFW at all, thus the being reason I did not censor the art when I sent it to the 2 adults

Also note that the date from these 2 screenshots that I provided are marked as “2nd May” (02/05/2023) while the messages in the server are marked as “1st May” (05/01/2023). The dates shown are also formatted differently. This is because I live in Asia when taking these screenshots while the screenshots taken by my friend is from the opposite side of the Earth

You might be wondering why I did not censor 2 of the people's names (Eito and Brass); EitoFZ is the person who runs @CoolExposingAcc (formerly @EitoFZ) on Twitter, while Brass is our late friend who died from suicide last year. Brass will be relevant in the next allegation that I am about to explain later (and possibly, in a future post regarding Brass’ suicide)

Eito was the person who accused me of sending “NSFW” artwork to minor that being the 15-year-old. He did see what the “NSFW” art in question looked like, but he ruled it out as NSFW anyway, when that was not the case. Nevertheless, he did not interrogate or question the “victim” to confirm whether the “NSFW” artwork that was sent was true or false. This is one of the accuser’s proofs of negligence when it came to compiling and providing proof to confirm the accusations.

This is the same person who accused my friends and I for fetishizing Nazis despite the fact that he did not provide evidence to back up the accusation, let alone the fact that we never had conversations related to Nazi or the Axis powers. The only conversations we had that is close to that topic was us talking about history of World Wars in general and soldiers of Allied Powers, because military and war history are our interests. There is no point of accusing us with baseless accusations where there could be harmful consequences when they themselves have already failed to provide sufficient evidence to support it, let alone the fact that they provided none. On top of that, the accusers are irresponsible for not interrogating the people involved in the incident especially the person in focus that being the 15-year-old.

To conclude this case, was the art that I was hesitant to share ever posted in the server? No, because I never got answers from either of the 2 adults. Thus, I did not post it.

Allegation #2: April Fools Birthday Art

The 2nd allegation took place in a different server where I sent art for someone’s birthday. This can be shown by the colour of my server display name and the lack of icons next to the display name (unlike the previous allegation where the icon can be seen)

Before I debunk this allegation, let me put in the definitions of grooming from reliable sources in terms of actions related to this context:

Grooming (Noun) - 3. The action of attempting to form a relationship with a child or young person, with the intention of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act such as selling drugs or joining a terrorist organization. (Google’s English dictionary)

Groom (Verb) - 3. Form a relationship with (a child or young person) with the intention of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act such as selling drugs or joining a terrorist organization. (Google’s English Dictionary)

Grooming (Noun) - 4. An act or instance of engaging in behaviours or practices intended to gradually condition or emotionally manipulate a victim over time, as through friendship, gifts, flattery, etc., in order to entrap the person in a sexually abusive or predatory relationship (Dictionary.com)

Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them. Children and young people who are groomed can be sexually abused, exploited or trafficked. (NPSCC)

Grooming describes the preparatory stage of child sexual abuse and exploitation, often undertaken to gain the trust and/or compliance of the child or young person and to establish secrecy and silence to avoid disclosure. A child or young person’s parents/carers or other significant adults (including organisations) may also be groomed by someone intending to harm a child. (Bravehearts)

Based on the original accuser (Eito) who provided the screenshot, both he and Fortress included, claimed that this was considered to be grooming due to my response to a 15-year-old, a different person from the previous allegation. However, whether or not that it is true, I will speak out my side of the story based on the screenshot being shown.

When the incident took place, I only uploaded the art there and left it at that. I did this to most of the servers I was in and I rarely talked in that server shown in the screenshot. That was when I got pinged a few minutes later, which was a reply to a caption of the meme. The only response I provided was with a crying emoji and then gibberish keysmash. If it was grooming, there would be signs of establishing trust towards the minor in question and coercion or manipulation that must taken place to be considered as grooming. However, as I said, I rarely talked in that server & just uploaded the art there just like in other servers I’m not really active in, and when someone replied, all I could do was react with an emoji, give a gibberish comment and that was it.

If the staff found this art inappropriate, they should have taken action sooner by contacting me privately or pinging me about the art instead of doing the latter and accusing me of grooming. I do not know if there was a continuation from this since this took place from a different server and my friend cannot access it, but since they focused on the part that is being specifically cropped, I could only explain what is being shown instead.

Fort referred the one on the cupcake as “cum”, despite the fact I did not mention anything that it is, nor have visible implication that it is. The only thing I could say is that yes, it was inspired by the meme, however I used pictures of actual Visco’s cakes instead as reference. Actual semen would look cloudy with white patches and yellowish hue. The one I rendered in the art has a bluish hue almost like water, which led to me personally commented that it looks like hard water when I finished rendering it. For your information, the way that I rendered semen is not how I did for the art that was being shown. Because if it was cum, I wouldn’t be posting it publicly in the first place. At the same time, I do not like drawing unsanitary things such as putting actual semen with food in the mix. Additionally, if Fort said that the one on the cake is semen, then the one on his face would be considered as semen to him, which is not. That is actually sweat. The whole thing is poorly rendered and coloured in on purpose because it was also for April Fools.

However, I already stopped making this kind of art for April Fools to the courtesy of Brass’ passing, because I consider this as something disrespectful to him and it did not age well with the unexpected news of his suicide received from his friends who are witnesses. With that, I stopped making it out of respect for his death and apologize to the people who were close friends or associated with Brass.

——

I really do not like tagging this post with OFF related tags because it will clog it up with content that is unrelated to the tag but since Fort is using the tags to get reach within the OFF fandom, I have no choice but to do it too, along with tagging their user handles of their alt account (@diehardpizzer/@diehardp1zzer), their main account (@molochzmeat, formerly @diehardpizzer) and their art account (@molochsden, formerly @doodlefortress).

As I said from the 2nd point of my opening, please base your judgement from the information I presented here. Do not take into account with haste. Questions for clarification are appreciated. Insults and harassment are not tolerated and will be blocked immediately.

Edit: Already removed those unrelated tags and again, I will begin to block accounts if they don’t have the benefit of following according to what is being said at the beginning and the end of the post

#AidenKnow #Drama #Negative #DieHardPizzer #MolochzMeat #DoodleFortress #MolochsDen #TW Grooming mentioned #TW Suicide mentioned #TW Stalking #I cannot fit in more images as I have reached the maximum of 10 images #So I’ll put in what is relevant #I put the tag on stalking in this post since I mentioned it in the intro

26 notes · View notes