#Court cases on property
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
#Property legal status#Court cases on property#Real estate disputes#Registrar's Office inquiry#Right to Information (RTI) Act#Digital property records#Les Pendens order#Due diligence in real estate#Title insurance#Property transaction risks
0 notes
Note
Keith walking into the holding cell greeting all the regulars by name while Lance is sobbing lamenting that his life is over and his future is ruined (they were like. Trespassing or some shit he’s going to be fine)
lance: (actively dry heaving in the corner, on the verge of a panic attack as he imagines having a permanent record)(actually what does a permanent record even look like?)(omg is he going to have to go to COURT? like in JUDGE JUDY?)
keith: remy, this is lance. lance, this is remy, she’s my favorite alcoholic :)
#voltron#klance#honestly I imagine they got caught trespassing while ghost hunting#if they’re in Texas then they will most likely get a full on misdemeanor on their record. Texas is very big on property rights.#trespassing can quickly elevate to criminal charges in texas it is actually very serious. do not trespass in texas.#meanwhile in Maine trespassing can be just an infraction & not added to your record#like sure they're teenagers so they could get their records sealed or expunged when they're 18. but like. the garrison would know. not good#sorry i just like talking about the law#speaking of which let me go on a tangent#i do think keith frequently gets charged with trespassing. at his own shack in the desert.#and so now he is Really good at juvenile law specifically because he is constantly arguing with cops#keith: this is not trespassing. my dad owned this property & he died unmarried without a will.#keith: i am literally his child and i inherited this land after his death YOU CAN'T ARREST ME FOR TRESPASSING ON MY OWN PROPERTY.#cop: okay well the house is all burned down it's a safety hazard#keith: I AM NOT IN THE HOUSE I AM IN THE SHACK WHICH MEETS MINIMUM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. GET FUCKED.#cop: okay but you're out after curfew--#keith: is this a game to you? drag me in front of that judge i DARE you. you want to take the ORPHAN to court over CURFEW?#keith: you want to arrest my parents? WHAT PARENTS? everyone in this county knows me as the son of a hero firefighter.#keith: a hero firefighter who died in the line of duty btw. in case you forgot. since i'm an ORPHAN who has no one who CARES about CURFEW.#keith: my dad is dead my mom is gone my brother disappeared in space im 0 for 3 parents-wise. drag me before a judge. make my fucking night#sometimes i answer an ask or make a post specifically so i can do my own separate thing in the tags#i just like talking about law. i'm so excited for law school u guys#keith#lance#lance: (freaking out)#keith: (relaxed because he knows a really good lawyer who specializes in juvenile law)#shitpost#ask#anonymous#otp: we are a good team
226 notes
·
View notes
Text
hey remember when i said i was drawing Vic Chaos as a milf?
alternates with different lighting (with and without words) and a time lapse under the cut! (btw the words on the cover all have to do with lore in my post covid au so send asks if you’re interested <3)
tw for nudity (without genitalia) in the time lapse cause i shaded the whole body before drawing the dress
#this is the most effort i’ve put into a drawing in the past year#im so in love with her <3#fellas is it wrong for a girl to be in love with her own design of a 40+ year old south park character#i’m never gonna shut up about this drawing idk what to tell you#south park#south park au#south park fanart#south park art#cyn art#also about the extra words:#yes the interview with Kenny bit does confirm that in this au Kenny finally convinces the world he’s immortal#the bonus about Jimmy being in a court case involving ‘Birch’ IS a reference to Timmy Birch and has to do with his lore as well#and yes Vic was on America’s top ten most wanted list for a variety of reasons including but not limited to:#money laundering tax evasion breaking and entering arson murder smuggling people across the border destruction of private property-#-starting a violent uprising being able to manipulate anyone and everyone incredibly easily possession of substances and illegal weapons#and more#shes my babygirl i can make her commit whatever war crimes i want#also you may notice she’s wearing a wedding ring but her name is still ‘Chaos’#this is because her and Kenny are married but since they’re both well known they don’t want the extra media drama#butters stotch#marjorine stotch#sp butters#butters sp#sp marjorine#marjorine sp#vic chaos#victor chaos#sp post covid#south park post covid#south park pcov
67 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hello Vincent! I hope this e-mail finds you well however I have something I'd like to ask. Could I please borrow your notes from last lecture? I was... Busy doing things that day that needed my immediate attention. also on a COMPLETELY different note if a person, i don't know. say. killed a man and then filled someone elses dormroom with sand on that same day they wouldn't be charged for it would they? All the best, Confused Classmate.
Dear Confused Classmate,
Despite my reputation as an excellent student who encourages education and stands for all things learning, I do not stand for such e-mails. The issue at hand lies not in the fact that you took a chance at asking for help from someone you consider more competent, which is completely fine; the real problem is the register and the structure of this letter.
First of all, the absence of an actual sing-off should be addressed. As far as I am concerned, any of my fellow students are capable of feeling confused, so unless I put my time and effort into figuring out who did not bother to attend the last lecture and who could have possibly written such an e-mail, I have no way of knowing who I am talking to, as your e-mail address is not RMU-affiliated and does not resemble a name of any kind.
Secondly, the way this message was put together is quite astonishing. Formal communication is the norm when using online correspondence, and sudden usage of caps lock is not a feature of this style.
As for your request, I do not usually share my notes. The syllabus, as well as all the necessary information and materials, can be found on the online course page. It is up to each student when and how to utilise that information, but please be assured that there is nothing a few hours of additional reading cannot fix.
The second question does not make much sense; however, if I were to answer to the best of my understanding, I would have to say that unless one is proven to be guilty, they are believed to be innocent. So, unless that person left enough evidence for both of these acts to be traced back to them, they are not going to be charged with anything.
In case you have any further questions for me or anyone else, please make sure to contact your person of choice after revising the guide to formal communication in the student section.
Best regards,
Vincent Edgeworth
#This combination of murder and property damage would probably be one of the most fascinating cases.#Especially if these instances were urelated.#I would doubt the sanity of a murderer who filled a room with sand not to hide a body or get rid of some evidence but for an unknown reason#Maybe that would be the point of indulging in such activities; people have tried to appear mentally unwell in court for ages#But sand... To be frank it sounds disgusting.#vtsom#vincent the secret of myers#vincent edgeworth#rp#ask blog#vtsom rp
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
i’m so dangerously into stealing rn? this guys work phone was left at the park i work at, and im like, trying to get it back to him bc im niceys or whatever and also its a fun little puzzle to me bc i can’t actually get into his locked phone. but also a part of me is like u should learn how to jailbreak phones and jailbreak this phone to wipe it and then steal it. cus it’s his work phone they’ll probably get him another. 😰
#i already stole some dudes kindle that he left here bc i looked him up and found him in a court case that reflected poorly on him#aka rich dude w beachfront property who was trying to sue the town for building a fucking retirement community near his house LMFAOOOO#i was like u don’t deserve this. mine now :)
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Indira Devi vs. Veena Gupta: Right of Repurchase is Assignable
Case: Indira Devi (Appellant) versus Veena Gupta & Ors. (Respondents)
Court: The Supreme Court of India.
Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of India Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Civil Appeal No. 9833 of 2014
Judgement Date: July 4 2023.
Bench: Honorable Justice Abhay S. Oka & Honorable Justice Rajesh Bindal
Concepts this case deals with –
Major:
Assignability of Right of Repurchase.
Transfer of Right in Immovable Property through Gift Deed.
Conditional Sale Deed.
Minor:
Who shall perform the considerations?
Interdependent contingent considerations.
Property Involved –
Property ‘A’
Persons Involved –
Mr. Kishori Lal Sahu: Exclusive Owner of Property ‘A’.
Smt. Veena Gupta: Daughter in Law of Kishori Lal Sahu. (Respondent)
Mr. Kaleshwar Prasad Singh: Tenant on Property ‘A’.
Smt. Indira Devi: Daughter of Kaleshwar Prasad Singh. (Appellant)
Documents Involved –
Conditional Sale Deed b/w Kishori Lal Sahu & Indira Devi concerning Property ‘A’.
Gift Deed by donor Kishori Lal Sahu to donee Veena Gupta, gifting number of properties including right/interest in Property ‘A’.
Suits & Appeals –
Original Suit: Trial Court 1983 - Civil Suit was Filed in 1983 by Veena Gupta & Kishori Lal Singh (at the time not deceased) for Special Performance as well as non-payment of rent against Indira Devi. (Suit Dismissed)
First Appeal: Lower Appellate Court 2000; Veena Gupta appeals against the dismissal of the suit. (Appeal is Dismissed)
Second Appeal: High Court Patna (Bihar): Second Appeal No. 123 of 2000; Veena Gupta appeals against the dismissal by lower appellate court. (Appeal admitted and adjudged on)
Supreme Court: Civil Appeal No. 9833 of 2014; Indira Devi appeals against the order of High Court. (Appeal is dismissed)
Facts of the Case –
Kishori Lal Sahu is the owner of property ‘A’ and Kaleshwar Prasad Singh is a tenant on the said property.
On 5th August 1977 Kishori Lal Singh the Owner & His Son due to dire need of funds executed a conditional sale deed in favour of Indira Devi (Vendee) d/o Kaleshwar the tenant. The condition was that the Vendee would pay Rs. 5000 as consideration to the Vendor, and if this Rs. 5000 is not returned by the Vendor by July 1984, the Vendee will become the owner of the property, and if the money is paid back, the Vendee will have to execute a sale deed of the property in favour of the Vendor that is to return the property.
On 14th February 1983 Kishori Lal executed a registered gift deed whereby he gifted number of properties to Veena Gupta (Respondent No. 1) the Daughter in Law of Kishori Lal and Wife of Gopal Prasad. The number of properties gifted contained the property in question where it was mentioned that the said property was transferred to Indira Devi, which can be retrieved by fulfilling conditions, that is to pay Rs. 5000 by July 1984. The Gift Deed was executed in 1983.
The Vendors that is Kishori Lal was ready to pay Rs. 5000, but the Vendees didn't agree and a civil suit was filed in 1983 in a Trial Court.
Plea by Respondent (Plaintiff in that suit) in Trial Court 1983: Special Performance Decree requiring Indira Devi/Kaleshwar (Defendant there) to accept Rs. 5000 and return the property, and if there is no performance, a decree directing appellant to register the sale deed in favour of Veena Gupta (Kishori Lal 2nd Plaintiff) with possession.
Representations in the Supreme Court:
Appellants (Indira Devi):
Kishori Lal executed the conditional deed in favour of Indira. And thus the right of repurchasing the property lies with Kishori Lal as the said right is personal. Stating he had no right to assign the right to third party.
Gift Deed executed is not valid as it contains consideration to be paid for obtaining the said property.
Judgements in the following cases: Bhoju Mandal v. Debnath Bhagat, Kapilaben vs. Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth; were cited for supporting the case.
Respondents (Veena Gupta):
In the Gift Deed it is specifically mentioned that how donee may obtain the property by performing the promise of the contract/deed. 'She will have all the rights which Kishori Lal had'.
When as per the contract the vendor (Kishori Lal, non-deceased at the time of original suit of 1983 / Veena Gupta) was to give Rs. 5000 for repurchase, the vendor was willing to give but the consideration was not accepted by Indira Devi, thus to complete their part of promise Vendor deposited Rs. 5000 with Court of Original Suit with its permission.
The condition precedent for the repurchase was thus completed, and Kishori Lal assigned the right to repurchase to Veena Gupta through Gift deed.
To counter that the right of repurchase was personal, following judgements were cited for support: T.M. Balakrishna Mudaliar vs. M. Satyanarayana Rao, Shyam Singh vs Daryao Singh. It was contested that the right was assignable and not personal. And even if the Court would deal with the issue sensitively, the party assigned to was not any third party rather it was a party from the family of Kishori Lal himself.
Law & Analysis
Following are the Issues to be answered by us on the basis of facts of the case, representations made, and previous judgements:
Is the Gift deed valid?
Is the right of repurchase assignable or personal?
1. Will first begin with the validity of Gift Deed:
Gift is defined under Section 122 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 as: Gift is the transfer of certain existing moveable or immoveable property made voluntarily and *without consideration*, by one person, called the donor, to another, called the donee, and accepted by or on behalf of the donee.
Under the Transfer of Property Act Immovable Property is defined to mean anything except standing timber, growing crops or grass. Further interpretation of other definitions of other acts include Land, Things attached to earth and benefits , Benefits to arise from land. If further studied a Right if related to movable or immovable properties then a Right related to Immovable Property becomes a immovable property. Even if we consider it a movable property it can still be gifted through a gift deed.
Thus it is agreeable that in this case in the gift deed the Property 'Physical' in Question is not gifted, rather the right to repurchase to same is transferred. The consideration comes in question when dealing with the physical actual property in question. The donee didn't have to pay any consideration for the right which was transferred.
2. Is the right to repurchase personal or can be assigned?
To begin with, we must look into the contract itself that is its clauses, content and intention of the parties which may be based of the language of the contract or the circumstances preceding or at the time when the contract was executed.
- In our case on the basis of the part of the sale deed presented before the High Court the deed didn't specifically contain any clauses prohibiting the assignment of the right of repurchase.
- At first, although it is not strictly related to our case, but we must look at Section 40 of the Indian Contracts Act to ascertain whether a promise or performance is personal: 'If it appears from the nature of the case that it was the intention of the parties to any contract that any promise contained in it should be performed by the promisor himself, such promise must be performed by the promisor. In other cases, the promisor or his representatives may employ a competent person to perform it.' Thus if a promise is of a nature that only the promisor has the ability to perform or skills then it can be performed only by the promisor.
Assignability of Contractual Rights or Obligations:
Under Indian Law any type of contract can be assigned except those specifically prohibiting the same or which are of personal nature. In the case of Kapilaben v. Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth the Supreme Court observed that when entire promise or perfomance of one party towards the other are transferred to third party, then the consent of the promisee is required but when assigning just the rights or obligations to another doesn't require consent except when it is not of personal nature or if it is not specifically prohibited.
To stress on this point we will look at some of the cases cited by the counsels of the present case:
1. T.M. Balakrishna Mudaliar vs. M. Satyanarayana Rao –
The Court refered to the judgement in the case of Sakalaguna Nayadu v. Chinna Munuswami Naykar where in the Privy Council held that if the contract of repurchase did not specifically say that such benefit was only for the parties contracting, then the contract can be assigned and would be enforceable by law.
2. Shyam Singh vs Daryao Singh –
The facts of the stated case were somewhat similar to those of the present case. Lower courts opined that if there is no clause in the sale deed permitting assignment, then prohibition of the same can be read into the contract. When the matter came to Supreme Court the issue at point was considered whether such a prohibition can be read into the document by implication. The court by citing Section 15(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 held that in absence of words indicating prohibition in the contract, then such prohibition cannot be read into the terms of documents.
Section 15 (b) of Specific Relief Act, 1963 stipulates that specific performance of a contract may be obtained by the representative in interest or the principal thereto: Except if it is of personal nature.
The Court was fortified with the view stated in the above cases by the Justices.
3. Bhoju Mandal v. Debnath Bhagat –
The Court considered this case, but the case primarily was concerned with the question whether document was mortgage or sale deed with condition of repurchase.
4. Kapilaben v. Ashok Kumar Jayantilal Sheth –
In this case issue was transfer/assignment of contract was without the consent of the promisee. The Court referred to judgement in Khardah Co. Ltd v. Raymon & Co. wherein the Court held that there was a well-recognized distinction between two classes of assignments which are assignment of rights in a contract and assignment of obligations in a contract. While the total assignment of contract that is substituting a party by a new party with consent/agreement of both original parties is called novation, where on novation there is no link between the old party and the new/amended contract, in such a case as said consent is required.
But when considering assignment of just the rights under a contract consent of the promisee is not strictly required that is the rights are freely assignable unless the contract prohibits it.
The Court in the present case also referred to a commentary on The Indian Contract Act & Special Relief Act by authors Pollock and Mulla, wherein the authors opine that the benefits of contract can be assigned where it makes no difference to the person on whom the obligation lies to which of two person (original or asignee) he is to discharge it. That is where the identity of the party on which the obligation is to be discharged makes no difference to the promisee (one who has obligations), provided the original promisor has effected such assignment willingly, then such contract is prima facie assignable, except in case of personal consideration. Of course payment of money does not involve personal consideration/skills.
Thus, the Court in this present case held that the right was not personal rather freely assignable in absence of bar in contract.
Conclusion:
We can conclude simply that:
1. Non-assignability cannot be implied into contract if it doesn't specifically mention it.
2. Rights under a contract when not of a personal nature can be assigned freely without consent, except barred.
3. Gift of a interest in immovable property irrespective of consideration involved in further exercise of the right is valid as there is no apparent consideration for the right itself.
Thankyou for reading! Connect with me on LinkedIn Soham Sane.
#supreme court#case comment#Indian Contracts Act#Right to Repurchase Property#Transfer of Property Act#Landmark Judgement
1 note
·
View note
Text
उधारी वसूलने के कानूनी उपाय क्या हैं?
उधारी वसूलने के लिए कई कानूनी उपाय हैं। यदि आपके द्वारा उधार दी गई राशि वापस नहीं की जा रही है, तो आप निम्नलिखित कदम उठा सकते हैं:
लिखित प्रमाण:
सुनिश्चित करें कि आपके पास उधारी के संबंध में पर्याप्त साक्ष्य हैं जैसे कि ऋण रसीद, चेक, बैंक ट्रांजैक्शन, ईमेल या संदेश के माध्यम से वार्तालाप।
नोटिस भेजें:
एक कानूनी नोटिस भेजें जिसमें आप उधारी के विवरण को स्पष्ट रूप से बताएँ और वापसी के लिए एक समय सीमा निर्धारित करें। यह एक औपचारिक प्रक्रिया होती है और इसे वकील द्वारा तैयार किया जा सकता है।
पुलिस में शिकायत:
यदि आपको लगता है कि उधारीदार धोखाधड़ी कर रहा है, तो आप पुलिस में शिकायत दर्ज कर सकते हैं। इसके लिए आपको उचित सबूत प्रस्तुत करने होंगे।
उपभोक्ता फोरम:
यदि उधारी ब्याज के साथ है और यह उपभोक्ता मामला बनता है, तो आप उपभोक्ता फोरम में शिकायत कर सकते हैं।
न्यायालय में मामला दायर करना:
यदि व्यक्ति पैसे नहीं चुका रहा है और अन्य सभी उपाय विफल हो गए हैं, तो आप उस व्यक्ति के खिलाफ सामान्य न्यायालय में मामला दायर कर सकते हैं। इस प्रक्रिया में वकील की मदद लेना उचित होगा।
मध्यस्थता और विवाद निपटान:
कई बार, कोर्ट में जाने से पहले विवाद को मध्यस्थता के माध्यम से हल करने की कोशिश की जा सकती है। यह एक अधिक सरल और त्वरित प्रक्रिया हो सकती है।
समझौता करना:
यदि आपकी स्थिति अनुमति देती है, तो आप उधारीदार के साथ समझौता करने की कोशिश करें। कभी-कभी, एक बातचीत से समाधान हो सकता है।
इंटरनेट और डिजिटल फोरम:
कुछ मामले, विशेष रूप से यदि वे छोटे हैं या छोटे ट्रांजैक्शन हैं, तो आप ऑनलाइन विवाद समाधान प्लेटफार्मों पर भी ले जा सकते हैं।
इन सभी उपायों के साथ-साथ, यह भी महत्वपूर्ण है कि आप सभी कानूनी प्रक्रियाओं और नियमों का पालन करें। सलाहकार या वकील से मार्गदर्शन लेना हमेशा फायदेमंद होता है।
Advocate Karan Singh (Kanpur Nagar)
8188810555, 7007528025
#Family Court Lawyer#POCSO Act Lawyer#Criminal Lawyer#Session Court Lawyer#Anticipatory Bail#Arbitration#Cheque Bounce#Child Custody#Consumer Court#Criminal#Divorce#Documentation#Domestic Violence#Family#Insurance#International Law#Motor Accident#Muslim Law#NRI#Property#Succession Certificate#Supreme Court#Wills / Trusts#File for Divorce#Reply / Send Legal Notice for Divorce#Contest / Appeal in Divorce Case#Dowry Demand / Domestic Violence / Abuse#Alimony / Maintenance Issue#Child Custody Issue#Extramarital Affair / Cheating
0 notes
Text
Man's bitter £300k 4-year battle with painter neighbour re 4ft stream | UK | News News Buzz
Potter David Wright and wife Laura (right foreground) (Image: Champion News) An artisan potter has beaten his painter neighbour in a £300,000 test case court battle over who owns a brook dividing their gardens in a quintessential English village. David Wright creates ceramics using a Japanese-influenced technique and describes his creative process in the studio he built in his garden in the…
View On WordPress
#Adverse Possession#boundaries#Boundary Dispute#civil case#civil courts#Court news#courts#David Wright#Dee Narga#litigation#neighbour dispute#neighbours#property#property boundaries#property dispute#sue#suing
0 notes
Text
Out of Court Settlement Procedure in India NRI Cases
Out-of-court settlement procedures in India for Non-Resident Indian (NRI) cases offer a practical alternative to lengthy litigation. Here’s a concise overview of the process:
1. Understanding the Concept
Out-of-court settlements allow parties to resolve disputes amicably without going to trial. This can save time, reduce costs, and preserve relationships, making it an attractive option for NRIs dealing with various legal issues, such as family disputes, property matters, or commercial disagreements.
2. Initiating the Process
The first step is for the parties involved to express a willingness to settle. This can be initiated through direct communication or facilitated by legal representatives. It’s essential to outline the issues at stake and identify common interests to foster a collaborative approach.
3. Engaging Legal Counsel
NRIs should engage legal counsel familiar with both Indian law and the specific issues at hand. A lawyer can help negotiate terms, draft settlement agreements, and ensure that all legal requirements are met.
4. Mediation or Negotiation
Mediation is a common method for reaching an out-of-court settlement. A neutral third party, the mediator, assists in facilitating discussions between the disputing parties. The mediator helps identify areas of agreement and assists in negotiating a mutually acceptable solution. If mediation isn’t suitable, direct negotiation between the parties or their lawyers can also be effective.
5. Drafting a Settlement Agreement
Once terms are agreed upon, a formal settlement agreement should be drafted. This document should detail the terms of the settlement, including any compensation, timelines, and obligations of each party. It’s crucial that both parties understand and consent to the agreement.
6. Execution of the Agreement
After drafting, both parties must sign the settlement agreement. It’s advisable to have the agreement notarized or registered, especially if it involves substantial obligations or property transfers, to ensure enforceability.
7. Enforcement and Compliance
Once the settlement is executed, parties should adhere to the terms outlined in the agreement. If one party fails to comply, the other can seek legal recourse, but this is typically less contentious than pursuing a full court case.
8. Benefits of Out-of-Court Settlement
Out-of-court settlements provide several advantages, including confidentiality, reduced legal fees, and quicker resolution compared to court proceedings. For NRIs, this process can also mitigate the challenges of appearing in court due to geographical constraints.
In summary, the out-of-court settlement procedure in India for NRIs involves initiating discussions, engaging legal counsel, mediating or negotiating terms, drafting a formal agreement, and ensuring compliance, making it a viable option for resolving disputes efficiently.
#lawyer#supreme court#settlement#out of court ooc#nri#cases#advocate#law#legal#property law#indian nri
0 notes
Text
#Court case#court case astrology#Legal issues#horoscope analysis for court cases#predict court cases#How long will my case continue#Will I be able to win the court case#Bandhan Yoga#Will my case be concluded this year#astrology for property#What will be my lifespan#under debts#finance astrology#Court Cases using Astrology#Legal issues in Horoscope#Court Cases in Horoscope#Mumbai asrtro#Mumbai astrologer#birth chart#horoscope
0 notes
Text
Bank Seals Jamshedpur's Aarogyam Nursing Home Over Loan Default
Aarogyam Nursing Home shut down after failing to repay 2.45 crore loan Court-ordered action sees Bank of Baroda sealing Sidhgora-based medical facility due to unpaid debt. JAMSHEDPUR – Local nursing home faces closure as bank takes possession over significant loan default. Aarogyam Nursing Home in Sidhgora area has been sealed by Bank of Baroda following a court order due to unpaid loans. The…
#Aarogyam Nursing Home sealed#जनजीवन#Bank of Baroda loan default#court-ordered property sealing#Debts Recovery Tribunal case#Jamshedpur financial news#Jamshedpur Healthcare Facilities#Life#medical sector loan issues#Munni Devi and Hari Prasad case#property attachment proceedings#Sidhgora area news
0 notes
Text
InterDigital Patent Case Against Oppo, RealMe, and OnePlus
View On WordPress
#4G Technology#5G Technology#Court Case#Delhi High Court#Indian Judiciary#Intellectual Property#InterDigital#Legal Dispute#Legal News#Mobile Technology#OnePlus#Oppo#Patent Enforcement#Patent Infringement#RealMe#SEPs#Smartphone Manufacturers#Standard-Essential Patents#Tech Industry#Technology Sector#Unauthorized Use
0 notes
Text
It really bothers me when I see MRAs harping on family court favoring women after divorce. Mothers getting custody of their children is actually a rather new concept and for much of history children were seen as the property of their father and fathers were usually granted custody automatically. This precedent existed into the 1970s. And still the court is biased in favor of men, men win 93% of custody cases they participate in, women are twice as likely to lose custody if they report abuse perpetrated by the father. Courts are still biased towards fathers and it is detrimental, the reason you see more custodial mothers is because men willingly give up custody. If they fought, chances are they’d win, even if it was against the child’s best interest.
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
#https://youtu.be/LfVynQ-9JjA#Private Property can Be Considered “material resources of the community”#article39(b)#supremecourt#Article39(b)#dpsp#SupremeCourtDebate#Article39bDebate#MaterialResources#privatepropertyrights#The Big debate#The Supreme Court on Tuesday (23 April) commenced hearing on the issue whether private property can be brought under “material resources of#BENCH:#The nine-judge bench#comprising Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud#Justices Hrishikesh Roy#Abhay S Oka#B V Nagarathna#J B Pardiwala#Manoj Misra#Ujjal Bhuyan#Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih#is hearing the case.#Article 39(b) of the Constitution of India places an obligation on “The State” to create policy towards securing “that the ownership and co#This provision falls under Part IV of the Constitution titled “Directive Principles of State Policy”#which are meant to be guiding principles for the enactment of laws#but are not directly enforceable against citizens.#Bombay High Court#Constitution Bench#Directive Principles of State Policy
0 notes
Text
*rubbing my hands together (evil version)* ooh hohoho my socages!!
#according to the doctrine of tenure all land is held by the crown and the crown was deemed to have absolute beneficial ownership of all#lands not alienated#interests in land could only be given by the crown and were ultimately held by the crown#this can be seen in the concept of escheat where title to the land reverts to the crown in the absence of heirs or claimants#in mabo no. 2 the high court accepted thr reality of indigenous existence and title#the court rejected the doctrine of enlarged terra nullius which regarded scAustralian lands as uninhabited before colonisation#it held that the crown only held absolute ownership over land not subject to valid native title claims#the crown held sovreignty but not beneficial ownership#this meant that they had a radical title subject to native title#only customary title that was consistent with basic common law tenets would be protected by native title#native title could be extinguished by the crown a freehold estate in that land or a leasehold estate if the lessee acted in a manner#inconsistent with the rights of the Indigenous titleholders as exclusive possessors#so yeah#evil indeed#the mabo case had the chance to consider the doctrines that underlie our system of property law#but colonial institutions will perpetuate colonialism unless we do something about it#the doctrine of estates would determine what type of socage i have#based on the torrens system and registration of title
0 notes
Text
ED Provisions: Immovable Properties Worth ₹43.84 Crore Attached in PMLA Cas
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) in Mumbai recently made a significant announcement regarding the provisional attachment of immovable properties, including several floors of Hotel One Continent in Hyderabad. Valued at ₹43.84 crore, these properties have been provisionally attached under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in connection with a loan fraud case…
View On WordPress
#Asset Attachment#compliance#delhi-advocate-high-court-delhi-lawyer-supreme-court-of#due diligence#ED#finance#Financial Transactions#Fraudulent Activities#HDIL#Immovable Properties#Investigation#Legal Action#Legal Proceedings#Loan Fraud Case#Money laundering#news#news-updated-knowledge-information#PMC Bank#PMLA#Prosecution Complaints#Provisional Attachment
0 notes