#Core i7 6950X

[christophermraerdon]

Best Budget PC Build for Content Creation

If you’re looking for the best budget PC build for content creation, you’ve come to the right place. In this blog post, we’ll go over what components you need to create a powerful and affordable system for content creation.

Content creators need a PC that can handle demanding tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. But not everyone has the budget for a high-end rig. Fortunately, it’s possible to build a great content creation PC on a budget.

Here’s everything you need to know about building the best pc build for content creation. We’ll cover the essential components, give some advice on where to save money, and provide some tips on getting the most out of your new system.

Best PC Build for Content Creation: The Ultimate Guide

If you’re looking for the best PC build for content creation, this is the ultimate guide for you. Content creators need a PC that can handle demanding tasks like video editing and rendering, as well as more mundane tasks like web browsing and office work. The good news is that there are plenty of great options out there, regardless of your budget.

For those on a tight budget, we recommend the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 as the bestcpu for content creation. It’s a great all-rounder that will be able to handle most tasks without breaking the bank. If you have a bit more to spend, then we suggest going for the Intel Core i5-9600K. It’s slightly more expensive but offers better performance across the board.

For those who want the absolute best performance possible, no matter the cost, then we recommend going with an Intel Core i9-9900K or an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X CPU. These are both top-of-the-line CPUs that will offer exceptional performance for even the most demanding users. No matter which option you choose, you’ll be able to create amazing content with ease!

The Best CPUs for Content Creation

There are a lot of things to consider when building the best PC for content creation. The CPU is one of the most important components in any computer, and it’s no different when it comes to a machine that will be used for tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. Here are some of the best CPUs for content creation available on the market today.

Intel Core i9-7980XE: This is Intel’s flagship consumer CPU and it offers an incredible 18 cores and 36 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2.6GHz, but can boost up to 4.2GHz when needed. It also supports DDR4-2666 memory and includes a turbo Boost 3.0 technology for better performance under load.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: This 16-core, 32-thread CPU from AMD offers excellent performance at a very competitive price point. It has a base clock speed of 3.4GHz, but can boost up to 4GHz when needed. It also supports DDR4-2400 memory and includes AMD’s Wraith Cooler with RGB LED lighting.

Intel Core i7-6950X: This 10-core, 20-thread CPU from Intel is another great option for content creators who need good performance without breaking the bank . It has a base clock speed of 3 GHz , but can boost up to 3 .5 GHz when needed . like the previous two options ,It also supports DDR4 – 2400 memory standard features include Intel ’ s Turbo Boost Max Technology 3 .0

The Best GPUs for Content Creation

There are a few things to consider when choosing the best GPUs for content creation. The main factor is of course, raw power. Creative professionals need all the horsepower they can get their hands on to render 4K video or manipulate large photos without breaking a sweat. But there’s more to it than that. Another important consideration is memory capacity, as creative applications tend to be very demanding when it comes to VRAM usage. And lastly, you’ll want to make sure your GPU has good driver support from the manufacturer, as this will ensure compatibility with the latest creative software releases.

So taking all of those factors into account, here are our picks for the best GPUs for content creation in 2020:

1) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: The king of high-end gaming GPUs also happens to be an excellent choice for content creators working in 4K or higher resolutions. It offers outstanding performance and plenty of VRAM capacity for even the most demanding tasks. Plus, with driver support from NVIDIA, you can be sure your RTX 2080 Ti will work great with all the latest creative software releases.

2) AMD Radeon VII: AMD’s new 7nm Vega architecture delivers excellent performance per watt ratios, making the Radeon VII a great choice for both gamers and content creators alike. It’s particularly well suited for 4K video editing and other GPU-intensive tasks thanks to its 16GB of HBM2 VRAM (8GB more than most competing cards). Just keep in mind that drivers fromAMD can sometimes lag behind those from NVIDIA when it comes to game and application compatibility..

3) NVIDIA Titan Xp: If money is no object and you absolutely need the fastest possible GPU performance regardless of price, then go with NVIDIA’s

The Best PCs for Photo and Video Editing

There are a lot of different ways to build the best pc for content creation purposes. However, here are three of the most popular and effective methods:

1. The first way is to use a processor that has high clock speeds. This is important because when you are editing photos or videos, you need to be able to process information quickly. Some of the best processors for this purpose include the Intel Core i7 and the AMD Ryzen 7.

2. Another way to build the best pc for content creation is to get a lot of RAM. This is important because it will allow you to have more programs open at the same time without your computer slowing down. For example, if you are working on a video project that uses a lot of graphics, you will need enough RAM so that your computer can still run smoothly.

3. The last way to build the best pc for content creation is to get a fast storage drive . This is important because it will help your computer load files quicker , which means less lag time when you are editing your photos or videos . Some of the best storage drives for this purpose include SSDs and NVMe drives .

Building the Ultimate PC for 4K video editing andrendering

Building the best pc build for content creation involves four key areas: a CPU powerful enough to handle 4K rendering, a quality GPU, adequate memory, and high-speed storage.

The most important factor in any 4K editing or rendering PC is the CPU. A powerful processor is needed to encode and decode 4K video footage quickly. The best consumer CPUs on the market right now are from Intel and AMD. For 4K rendering, we recommend an Intel Core i7 or AMD Ryzen 7 processor.

No matter how much money you spend on your graphics card, it won’t be able to properly display 4K video without a compatible monitor. An Ultra HD (UHD) monitor has a resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels – that’s four times as many pixels as a standard Full HD 1080p monitor. We recommend pairing your UHD monitor with at least an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti graphics card or better for smooth playback of even the most demanding 4K videos.

Adequate system memory is also critical for proper playback of 4K video footage. Most new computers come with 8GB of RAM installed, but we recommend upgrading to 16GB if you plan on doing any serious 4K editing or rendering workflows. For general usage and everyday tasks like browsing the web and checking email, 8GB should be plenty of RAM; but power users will want more for complex creative projects like video editing.”

How to build the best PC possible on a budget

Building a great PC on a budget is possible, and there are a few things you can do to make sure you get the best bang for your buck. First, consider what you need the PC for. If you’re looking to do some serious content creation, then focus on getting a powerful processor and plenty of RAM. A large hard drive will also come in handy for storing all your project files. Once you have an idea of what specifications you need, start shopping around for deals on components. You can often find great discounts on refurbs or used items from sites like eBay or Craigslist. Just be sure to check reviews before making any purchase to ensure that you’re getting a quality product.

With careful planning and execution, it is entirely possible to build an amazing PC without breaking the bank. So don’t be discouraged if you’re working with a limited budget – just use these tips and tricks to get the most bang for your buck!

Conclusion

If you’re looking to get into content creation but don’t want to spend a fortune, then this budget PC build is for you. For under $1,000, you can put together a rig that will let you edit video, create graphics, and stream your content to the world. And since it’s a budget build, you’ll have money left over to buy some camera equipment or editing software. So what are you waiting for? Get out there and start creating!

The post Best Budget PC Build for Content Creation appeared first on SwiftCreator.com.

https://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png https://swiftcreator.com/content-creation/best-budget-pc-build-for-content-creation/

https://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png https://swiftcreatorcom.wordpress.com/2022/12/11/best-budget-pc-build-for-content-creation/

[barbarewjohnson]

Best Budget PC Build for Content Creation

If you’re looking for the best budget PC build for content creation, you’ve come to the right place. In this blog post, we’ll go over what components you need to create a powerful and affordable system for content creation.

Content creators need a PC that can handle demanding tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. But not everyone has the budget for a high-end rig. Fortunately, it’s possible to build a great content creation PC on a budget.

Here’s everything you need to know about building the best pc build for content creation. We’ll cover the essential components, give some advice on where to save money, and provide some tips on getting the most out of your new system.

Best PC Build for Content Creation: The Ultimate Guide

If you’re looking for the best PC build for content creation, this is the ultimate guide for you. Content creators need a PC that can handle demanding tasks like video editing and rendering, as well as more mundane tasks like web browsing and office work. The good news is that there are plenty of great options out there, regardless of your budget.

For those on a tight budget, we recommend the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 as the bestcpu for content creation. It’s a great all-rounder that will be able to handle most tasks without breaking the bank. If you have a bit more to spend, then we suggest going for the Intel Core i5-9600K. It’s slightly more expensive but offers better performance across the board.

For those who want the absolute best performance possible, no matter the cost, then we recommend going with an Intel Core i9-9900K or an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X CPU. These are both top-of-the-line CPUs that will offer exceptional performance for even the most demanding users. No matter which option you choose, you’ll be able to create amazing content with ease!

The Best CPUs for Content Creation

There are a lot of things to consider when building the best PC for content creation. The CPU is one of the most important components in any computer, and it’s no different when it comes to a machine that will be used for tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. Here are some of the best CPUs for content creation available on the market today.

Intel Core i9-7980XE: This is Intel’s flagship consumer CPU and it offers an incredible 18 cores and 36 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2.6GHz, but can boost up to 4.2GHz when needed. It also supports DDR4-2666 memory and includes a turbo Boost 3.0 technology for better performance under load.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: This 16-core, 32-thread CPU from AMD offers excellent performance at a very competitive price point. It has a base clock speed of 3.4GHz, but can boost up to 4GHz when needed. It also supports DDR4-2400 memory and includes AMD’s Wraith Cooler with RGB LED lighting.

Intel Core i7-6950X: This 10-core, 20-thread CPU from Intel is another great option for content creators who need good performance without breaking the bank . It has a base clock speed of 3 GHz , but can boost up to 3 .5 GHz when needed . like the previous two options ,It also supports DDR4 – 2400 memory standard features include Intel ’ s Turbo Boost Max Technology 3 .0

The Best GPUs for Content Creation

There are a few things to consider when choosing the best GPUs for content creation. The main factor is of course, raw power. Creative professionals need all the horsepower they can get their hands on to render 4K video or manipulate large photos without breaking a sweat. But there’s more to it than that. Another important consideration is memory capacity, as creative applications tend to be very demanding when it comes to VRAM usage. And lastly, you’ll want to make sure your GPU has good driver support from the manufacturer, as this will ensure compatibility with the latest creative software releases.

So taking all of those factors into account, here are our picks for the best GPUs for content creation in 2020:

1) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: The king of high-end gaming GPUs also happens to be an excellent choice for content creators working in 4K or higher resolutions. It offers outstanding performance and plenty of VRAM capacity for even the most demanding tasks. Plus, with driver support from NVIDIA, you can be sure your RTX 2080 Ti will work great with all the latest creative software releases.

2) AMD Radeon VII: AMD’s new 7nm Vega architecture delivers excellent performance per watt ratios, making the Radeon VII a great choice for both gamers and content creators alike. It’s particularly well suited for 4K video editing and other GPU-intensive tasks thanks to its 16GB of HBM2 VRAM (8GB more than most competing cards). Just keep in mind that drivers fromAMD can sometimes lag behind those from NVIDIA when it comes to game and application compatibility..

3) NVIDIA Titan Xp: If money is no object and you absolutely need the fastest possible GPU performance regardless of price, then go with NVIDIA’s

The Best PCs for Photo and Video Editing

There are a lot of different ways to build the best pc for content creation purposes. However, here are three of the most popular and effective methods:

1. The first way is to use a processor that has high clock speeds. This is important because when you are editing photos or videos, you need to be able to process information quickly. Some of the best processors for this purpose include the Intel Core i7 and the AMD Ryzen 7.

2. Another way to build the best pc for content creation is to get a lot of RAM. This is important because it will allow you to have more programs open at the same time without your computer slowing down. For example, if you are working on a video project that uses a lot of graphics, you will need enough RAM so that your computer can still run smoothly.

3. The last way to build the best pc for content creation is to get a fast storage drive . This is important because it will help your computer load files quicker , which means less lag time when you are editing your photos or videos . Some of the best storage drives for this purpose include SSDs and NVMe drives .

Building the Ultimate PC for 4K video editing andrendering

Building the best pc build for content creation involves four key areas: a CPU powerful enough to handle 4K rendering, a quality GPU, adequate memory, and high-speed storage.

The most important factor in any 4K editing or rendering PC is the CPU. A powerful processor is needed to encode and decode 4K video footage quickly. The best consumer CPUs on the market right now are from Intel and AMD. For 4K rendering, we recommend an Intel Core i7 or AMD Ryzen 7 processor.

No matter how much money you spend on your graphics card, it won’t be able to properly display 4K video without a compatible monitor. An Ultra HD (UHD) monitor has a resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels – that’s four times as many pixels as a standard Full HD 1080p monitor. We recommend pairing your UHD monitor with at least an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Ti graphics card or better for smooth playback of even the most demanding 4K videos.

Adequate system memory is also critical for proper playback of 4K video footage. Most new computers come with 8GB of RAM installed, but we recommend upgrading to 16GB if you plan on doing any serious 4K editing or rendering workflows. For general usage and everyday tasks like browsing the web and checking email, 8GB should be plenty of RAM; but power users will want more for complex creative projects like video editing.”

How to build the best PC possible on a budget

Building a great PC on a budget is possible, and there are a few things you can do to make sure you get the best bang for your buck. First, consider what you need the PC for. If you’re looking to do some serious content creation, then focus on getting a powerful processor and plenty of RAM. A large hard drive will also come in handy for storing all your project files. Once you have an idea of what specifications you need, start shopping around for deals on components. You can often find great discounts on refurbs or used items from sites like eBay or Craigslist. Just be sure to check reviews before making any purchase to ensure that you’re getting a quality product.

With careful planning and execution, it is entirely possible to build an amazing PC without breaking the bank. So don’t be discouraged if you’re working with a limited budget – just use these tips and tricks to get the most bang for your buck!

Conclusion

If you’re looking to get into content creation but don’t want to spend a fortune, then this budget PC build is for you. For under $1,000, you can put together a rig that will let you edit video, create graphics, and stream your content to the world. And since it’s a budget build, you’ll have money left over to buy some camera equipment or editing software. So what are you waiting for? Get out there and start creating!

The post Best Budget PC Build for Content Creation appeared first on SwiftCreator.com.

https://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png https://swiftcreator.com/content-creation/best-budget-pc-build-for-content-creation/

https://ifttt.com/images/no_image_card.png https://swiftcreator.weebly.com/swift-creator/best-budget-pc-build-for-content-creation

[adolescentintraining]

3 Techniques For Getting Your First Trading PC

Trading is an exciting endeavor that is why you not only be able to have access to profitable signals but you can also win wins, make profits and control the risks. You must be serious about trading if you want to utilize your tablet or smartphone. It is important to invest in large amounts best pc for day trading. This will enable you to get access to markets, and will also provide you the capability to see different graphs on different displays.

It is possible that you don't be sure where to start, and you are unsure of the hardware is required to run your computer for trading. Yes, you can visit any computer store and buy a computer or laptop to start trading but it won't work since the amount of data your computer or laptop will be receiving is huge. If you are planning to trade continuously, you will need an equipment that is the highest performance hardware.

Here are 3 tips to buy the best pc for day trading

Processor and RAM

The processor is the brain of computers and just like the name suggests it helps in the calculation and processing of data and values. You need to plan for best pc for day trading when you are trader. What is the amount you are willing to pay? There are two options to choose from: an expensive i5 Intel Processor and a more affordable i7 Intel Processor if you have an extremely tight budget.

These processors are around 4 to six cores. These processors are affordable enough for traders on a tight budget. If you're looking for a highly performance processor, you can choose the Intel Core i7-6950x which has 10 COREs at 4.0 GHZ. If you're on a budget 8GB RAM is the recommended amount. For best performance, get 16GB or more of RAM. This will enable you to run all of your trading applications seamlessly.

Graphics card

Although computers today have integrated graphics chips, they don't perform trading. Okay they have the ability to process videos and images but trading softwares are demanding specifically the charting capabilities. Integrated graphics chips are not capable of supporting multiple monitors. Multiple monitors offer advantages to traders who are full time because they allow you to keep track of different charts and trades with ease.

There are two major companies that manufacture the best graphics chips. These include NVIDIA and AMD. Both provide high-quality graphics cards that can be used with third-party cooling systems. A few budget graphics cards to use with your computer for trading include EVGA GeForce GT 720 2GB DDR3,EVGA GeForce GT 740 Superclocked Single Slot 4GB DDR3 Video Card EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 SC GAMING ACX 3.0, 8GB GDDR5, PNY Quadro K620 Graphic Card and Nvidia Quadro K1200 Low Power and Low Profile. Remember, you don't need an expensive gaming graphics card.

Hard Drive & Cooling System

Since they are able to store and retrieve digital data as well as retrieve digital data, HDDs are indispensable. HDDs are made up of one or more rapidly turning discs that are coated in magnetic material that can be written and read by magnetic heads. The majority of computer users today are equipped with SSDs (solid-state drives). SSDs are able to be equipped with flash modules/chips that offer a significant benefit over HDDs.

Non-volatile memory chips do not have moving parts, meaning that data can be written and read faster than HDD. An SSD is the primary drive on the computer used by traders. It will run your preferred operating system, trading softwares, and other applications.

The HDD is a great option to use as a backup drive to store additional information. Heat is the enemy of computers processors and the only way to combat it is by installing a cooling unit. The cost of liquid cooling is high and you won't need to spend the same amount. The Cooler Master Hyper212 EVO single or dual fan can be bought.

Final Thoughts

It is essential to be a professional trader to have an edge in the market. One method of doing this is to invest in a top performant computer. Choose an operating system that comes with six cores or more and 16GB or more RAM, and a graphics card capable of support for 5K and 4K resolutions. When it comes to the hard drive, you should purchase an SSD as your primary drive and an HDD as a secondary drive. Cooling is essential and the most efficient models should contain at minimum two fans. Also, don't forget to invest in an experienced technical support.

[newsoku2chblog]

コスパ最強AMD Ryzan速すぎワロタwwww　Core i7 6950X(20万円)をぶっちぎるwww

1: 2017/02/27(月) 23:11:49.12 ID:PGcT4oAJ0 BE:422186189-PLT(12015) ポイント特典 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Beats Core i7 6950X and 7700K in Single/Multi-Thread CPU Tests http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-6950x-7700k-cpu-benchmarks/ http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-Single-Threaded-Performance-Benchmark.png

http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/AMD-Ry…

[addongame-com]

Игровые новости от AddonGame https://addongame.com/news/razrabotchiki-shadow-warrior-3-raskryli-sistemnye-trebovaniia-dlia-igry-v-1080p/

Разработчики Shadow Warrior 3 раскрыли системные требования для игры в 1080p

Вслед за подтверждением точной даты выхода издательство Devolver Digital и студия-разработчик Flying Wild Hog представили системные требования своего восточного шутера от первого лица Shadow Warrior 3.

Минимальная конфигурация соответствует 30 кадрам/с (в среднем) в разрешении 1080p при использовании низких настроек графики, а рекомендуемая — 60 кадрам/с, 1080p и высоким настройкам графики.

Системные требования Shadow Warrior 3 выглядят следующим образом:

Минимальные требования

ОС: Windows 7 (64 бит);

процессор: Intel Core i5-3470 (четырёхъядерный, 3,2 ГГц) или AMD Phenom II X4 965 (четырёхъядерный, 3,4 ГГц);

видеокарта: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 (2 Гбайт) или AMD Radeon R7 260X (2 Гбайт);

оперативная память: 8 Гбайт;

место на диске: 31 Гбайт.

Рекомендуемые требования

ОС: Windows 10 (64 бит);

процессор: Intel Core i7-6950X (десятиядерный, 3 ГГц) или AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (восьмиядерный, 3,2 ГГц);

видеокарта: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (8 Гбайт) или AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 Гбайт);

оперативная память: 8 Гбайт;

место на диске: 31 Гбайт.

С системными требованиями Shadow Warrior 3 можно ознакомиться на странице игры в сервисе цифровой дистрибуции Steam. Согласно описанию, проект предложит субтитры на русском языке.

Релиз Shadow Warrior 3 ожидается 1 марта текущего года на PC (Steam), PS4 и Xbox One. Предзаказы уже открыты — вместе с игрой в качестве бонуса отдают две предыдущие части и оформление для катаны из ограниченной серии.

По материалам: 3dnews.ru

[synergyload956]

Cinebench R15

Specs:Ryzen 7 2700X stockASUS Crosshair VI Hero16GB DDR4 3200-CL14Radeon ReLive seems to chop off some points when recording.Without screen record its more l. Cinebench has been a staple of the OC3D benchmark suite since we began and it is very good at testing both the single threaded performance as well as the overall thread count of your setup, regardless of which version you choose to run. Watching it on high core count CPUs is spectacular, but the updated single thread performance. CINEBENCH is based on MAXON's animation software CINEMA 4D 3D content creation. Yoshis crafted world nsp reddit. Download « Download GeForce 331.40 Beta Driver Download Cinebench 15 MSI MS-98D3 Ultra Low-Profile Embedded.

Dr hacker parallels 10. Mar 30, 2021 Maxon states Cinebench R20 is now using four times the memory and eight times the CPU computational power compared to Cinebench R15. Note: with motherboard settings at default, some brands reach. This is a database for CINEBENCH R15 benchmark results. We are trying to collect as many benchmark results as possible, to provide the most complete and up to date CINEBENCH R15 results database. You can use the results provided to compare a huge variety of different processors, to estimate render times on different CPU's or to estimate the.

by btarunrDiscuss (7 Comments)

Maxon posted Cinebench R15, the latest version of its CPU and GPU benchmark, popularized by its multi-threaded CPU tests. Available exclusively for 64-bit systems running Windows and OS X, Cinebench R15 features an upgraded renderer based on the company's Cinema 4D software, new test scenes, and a new scoring system. The CPU test utilizes up to 256 logical CPUs to render a 3D scene with approximately 2,000 objects, and over 300,000 polygons, with photo-realistic blurred reflections, area lights, shadows, procedural shaders, and antialiasing.DOWNLOAD:MAXON Cinebench R15

Related News

Nov 12th 2020Maxon Launches Cinebench R23 Benchmark (13)

Mar 11th 2019Maxon Sends Legal Threats to PC Enthusiast Websites Hosting Portable Cinebench R20 Downloads (149)

Mar 26th 2019Maxon Offers Cinebench R20 Direct Download -Microsoft Store Not Required (24)

Sep 12th 2017Intel Core i7-8700K Put Through Cinebench R15 (29)

Jul 31st 2017AMD Ryzen Threadripper Breaks 5.2 GHz + X399 Boards on Display! (28)

May 31st 2017Intel Core i9-7900X Overclocked To 5.7GHz Breaking Cinebench World Records (73)

Feb 21st 2017AMD's Ryzen 7 1700X Glorious Benchmarks Leak; IHS, Pin Layout Photographed (115)

Mar 6th 2017AMD Ryzen 7-1800X Cracks Cinebench R15 World Record at 5.36 GHz (46)

May 5th 2016Intel Core i7-6950X Tested Against i7-5960X (23)

7 Commentson Maxon Cinebench R15 Posted

18832 Cb

#1

[game-parlour]

Lawn Mowing Simulator System Requirements:

Minimum Requirements:

Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system

OS: Windows 10 x64

Processor: Intel Core i7-7700HQ (2 Cores @ 2.8GHz)/AMD FX-9590 (8 Cores @ 4.7GHz) or equivalent

Memory: 8 GB RAM

Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050Ti (4GB)/AMD Radeon R9 390X (8GB)

DirectX: Version 11

Storage: 20 GB available space

Additional Notes: 30 FPS+ @ Low 1080p

Recommended Requirements:

Requires a 64-bit processor and operating system

OS: Windows 10 x64

Processor: Intel Core i7-6950X (10 Cores @ 3.0GHz)/AMD Ryzen 7 1700X (8 Cores @ 3.4GHz) or equivalent

Memory: 8 GB RAM

Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (6GB)/AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8GB)

DirectX: Version 12

Storage: 20 GB available space

Additional Notes: 60 FPS+ @ High 1080p

[thaithanhbinh]

Sự trỗi dậy của AMD: CPU Ryzen dần dần giành lấy ngôi vương của Intel ra làm sao?

Ngày 25 tháng 11 năm ngoái được xem là một cột mốc lịch sử, đánh dấu một kỷ nguyên mới cho thị trường CPU máy tính. Trình làng cùng thời điểm, cùng nhắm vào phân khúc người dùng cá nhân cao cấp nhưng CPU “khủng bố” Threadripper 3970X, đầu bảng của AMD đã hoàn toàn vượt trội đối thủ cùng hạng của mình đến từ Intel, Core i9-10980XE. Điều này cũng không có gì là bất ngờ cho lắm khi nhìn vào số nhân vượt trội, 32 so với 18, gần như gấp đôi. Sự chênh lệch hiệu năng khủng khiếp này như là phát súng kết liễu và là lời khẳng định chắc nịch về sự trở lại mạnh mẽ của AMD trên thị trường CPU. Sự thật này đã dần le lói từ khi thế hệ Ryzen đầu tiên ra đời cách đây 3 năm nhưng giờ đã được xem là điều hiển nhiên.

Lần đầu tiên sau khi kỉ nguyên vi kiến trúc Intel Core kết thúc sự thống trị của Athlon 64, CPU của AMD thực sự kiểm soát được thị trường CPU máy bàn. Trong 15 năm vật lộn, bao gồm chút cố gắng với Bulldozer, AMD gần như không có tác dụng cạnh tranh với Intel trên mặt trận máy bàn cũng như máy tính xách tay. Thừa thắng xông lên, dòng CPU Ryzen 4000 cho laptop được giới thiệu hồi cuối tháng 3 vừa qua tiếp tục đánh rung lên hồi chuông cảnh tỉnh cho Intel với hiệu năng vượt trội đồng thời xóa bỏ định kiến “AMD là nóng và tốn điện”.

Sự thành công của AMD có sự đóng góp quan trọng của thiết kế nhiều đế silicon trên một vi xử lý thay vì một đế duy nhất như Intel. Nhờ vậy, việc nhồi nhét thêm nhân trên một vi xử lý trở nên dễ dàng với chi phí rẻ hơn rất nhiều so với Intel.

Đã có lúc, người ta tưởng rằng thiết kế một đế silicon trên một CPU của Intel là đỉnh cao. Ngủ quên trên chiến thắng trong 10 năm nhờ vị trí gần như độc tôn trên thị trường, việc duy nhất Intel cải thiện trên dòng CPU Core của họ là hiệu năng đơn nhân mà bỏ quên hiệu năng đa nhân. Từ năm 2008 đến 2017, CPU Core i7 cao cấp nhất của đội xanh cũng chỉ có 4 nhân 8 luồng. Mãi tới năm 2016, khi tin đồn về Ryzen rộ lên, Intel mới trình làng dòng CPU Broadwell-E với CPU cao cấp nhất, i7-6950X mang trong mình tới 10 nhân. Tuy nhiên, giá bán của nó không dễ chịu 1 chút nào, ở mức 1723 USD, gấp gần 5 lần một chiếc CPU i7-6700K lúc bấy giờ và đắt hơn 700 USD so với i7-6900K với 8 nhân.

Xuôi thời gian tới tháng 3 năm 2017, trong khi một chiếc CPU 8 nhân của Intel có giá tới 1089 USD, AMD trình làng thế hệ Ryzen đầu tiên, làm tràn ngập thị trường với nhân và luồng. Một chiếc Ryzen 7 1800X với 8 nhân 16 luồng, cao cấp nhất của AMD có giá chỉ 499 USD. Thậm chí, người dùng có thể lựa chọn một phiên bản tiết kiệm hơn là Ryzen 7 1700 với giá chỉ 330 USD mà vẫn có đc 8 nhân 16 luồng. Nhờ vậy mà lần đầu tiên sau 10 năm Intel mới bắt đầu tăng số nhân trên CPU phổ thông của mình, xuất phát điểm từ Kaby Lake 8xxx.

Tất nhiên, cái gì cũng có giá của nó. Vi kiến trúc Zen thế hệ đầu tiên của AMD không thể một bước trở thành hoàn hảo. Thế hệ Ryzen đầu tiên, 1xxx dù có thể mang lại hiệu năng đa nhân vượt trội nhờ số nhân gấp đôi, xung nhịp và IPC của Ryzen 1xxx thua khá xa so với đối thủ bên kia chiến tuyến. Vì vậy, những ứng dụng yêu cầu hiệu năng đơn nhân khi chạy trên Ryzen thua kém hoàn toàn so với Intel Core i thế hệ thứ 7.

Biết mình biết ta, AMD tiếp tục nỗ lực để cải tiến các vấn đề tồn đọng với vi kiến trúc Zen+. Thế hệ thứ 2 của Ryzen ra mắt với Ryzen 7 2700X là CPU đầu bảng có giá chỉ 330 USD mà vẫn có tới 8 nhân 16 luồng. Hiệu năng chung của dòng CPU này cũng được cải thiện rõ rệt với xung nhịp cao hơn, độ trễ từ bộ nhớ đệm thấp hơn. Tất nhiên, hiệu năng chơi game hay đơn nhân của Ryzen 2xxx vẫn thua kém Intel nhưng khoảng cách đã được thu hẹp hơn rất nhiều.

Sự trỗi dậy của AMD cũng đồng thời là lúc Intel bắt đầu cho thấy họ đang gặp trắc trở thế nào để mang tới những cải tiến cho dòng CPU phổ thông của mình. Trong khi AMD liên tục thu nhỏ kích thước bóng bán dẫn của mình xuống 12nm với Ryzen 2xxx và sau đó là 7nm với Ryzen 3xxx, Intel vẫn bám trụ với tiến trình 14nm ra mắt từ 2015 của mình. Chỉ là mỗi năm họ lại thêm một dấu + đằng sau 14nm. Thậm chí, thế hệ CPU Comet Lake đang được đồn đoán sẽ ra mắt thời điểm cuối tháng này vẫn tiếp tục mang bóng bán dẫn kích thước 14nm.

Cũng trong khoảng thời gian trên, hàng loạt những lỗ hổng bảo mật như Spectre và Meltdown đã khiến Intel phải đưa ra những bản cập nhật phần mềm để kìm hãm sức mạnh các dòng CPU của mình. Thậm chí, Core i thế hệ 9 còn bị cắt bỏ tính tăng siêu luồng Hyper-Threading trên các dòng CPU i5 và i7. Đồng thời, chính những nhà máy của Intel cũng gặp trắc trở với việc đạt sản lượng đủ với nhu cầu của thị trường.

Cuối Quý III 2019, AMD lại nổ thêm một phát súng nữa. Trong khi Intel đang dừng ở 14nm++++ thì AMD đã có thêm một bước tiến xa hơn với dòng Ryzen 3xxx sản xuất trên tiến trình 7nm, mang trong mình vi kiến trúc Zen 2 hoàn toàn mới, cải thiện rõ rệt hiệu năng tính toán, IPC và xung nhịp. Đây cũng là dòng CPU đầu tiên trên thế giới hỗ trợ giao thức PCIe 4.0. Nhờ những cải tiến về vi kiến trúc và thiết kế, lần đầu tiên các CPU phổ thông chạm ngưỡng 16 nhân trên Ryzen 9 3950X, gấp đôi đối thủ trực tiếp Core i9-9900K. Mọi khoảng cách về hiệu năng gần như bị xóa nhòa, nhất là khi các ứng dụng hay games được phát triển mới đều có tác dụng tận dụng tốt số lượng nhân vượt trội mà các CPU Ryzen mang lại. Giờ đây chẳng còn mấy lý do để mua Intel Core i9 thay vì Ryzen 9 3xxx, kể cả khi i9-9900KS vẫn giữ ngôi quán quân về xung nhịp, lên tới 5GHz.

Ryzen 9 3900X giữ vai trò quan trọng, làm thay đổi thị trường như cách mà AMD K7 Athlon là CPU đầu tiên chạm ngưỡng 1GHz hay Athlon 64 làm trùm về điện toán 64-bit. Ở một số bài thử, Ryzen 9 3950X với chỉ 16 nhân giá 500 USD thậm chí là đánh bại được CPU 18 nhân Core i9-10980XE giá 979 USD của Intel. Không cần nói hẳn ai cũng biết Threadripper 3970X rồi 3990X với lần lượt 32 và 64 nhân của AMD vượt trội thế nào so với đối thủ từ Intel.

Ở thời điểm hiện tại, Ryzen mới là lựa chọn tối ưu cho mọi chiếc PC, trừ khi bạn cần đến Intel Quick Sync để hỗ trợ một số ứng dụng chỉnh sửa video nhất định, dùng các công cụ của Adobe như Photoshop, cần chơi game với số lượng FPS cực cao hay cần xử lý những tác vụ liên quan tới deep learning hoặc tập lệnh AVX-512. Trước 2019, bạn sẽ cần lý do để chọn Ryzen thì giờ ngược lại, bạn sẽ cần lý do để chọn Intel.

Dù AMD trỗi dậy thế nào đi chăng nữa thì chúng ta cũng không nên coi thường Intel. Thị phần CPU cho desktop của Intel vẫn là phần lớn. Thị phần CPU cho laptop vẫn là của Intel dù Ryzen 4000 vừa ra mắt. Hãy nhớ một điều rằng, lần cuối Intel gặp cảnh khó khăn này, họ đã trình làng Conroe và vi kiến trúc Core để ngự trị trên đỉnh thị trường CPU trong vòng 15 năm. Không phải tự dưng mà người ta vẫn gọi Intel là người khổng lồ trong làng chip. Cho tới khi đó, AMD và Ryzen vẫn xứng đáng được nhận mọi lời ngợi khen bởi những gì họ đã làm trong 3 năm qua. Nếu không có đội đỏ thì có lẽ phần lớn người dùng máy bàn vẫn đang tiếp tục phải trả 4-500 USD cho một chiếc CPU 4 nhân 8 luồng.

Người người làm việc ở nhà, CPU Intel bất ngờ rất được quan tâm hơn AMD

Nguồn: genk

Bài viết Sự trỗi dậy của AMD: CPU Ryzen dần dần giành lấy ngôi vương của Intel ra làm sao? đã xuất hiện đầu tiên vào ngày Đồ Chơi Công Nghệ.

source https://dochoicongnghe.com.vn/su-troi-day-cua-amd-cpu-ryzen-dan-dan-gianh-lay-ngoi-vuong-cua-intel-nhu-the-nao-15240.html

[sub-media]

Intel's current flagship desktop CPU - the Core i7-6950X has 10 cores but that could double with the Core i9-7980XE, which could have 18 cores. https://ift.tt/38T0dgj

[laflechanet]

Nueva noticia publicada en LaFlecha

New Post has been published on https://laflecha.net/que-es-intel-turbo-boost-3-0-caracteristicas-y-utilidad/

Qué es Intel Turbo Boost 3.0, características y utilidad

A principios de semana pasada hablábamos de la tecnología Turbo Boost de Intel en su versión 2.0, la cual tal y como vimos ha sido un gran paso adelante de la compañía. La tecnología avanzó y en la arquitectura Haswell mediante la gama HEDT de procesadores de Intel, la compañía lanzó una nueva versión enfocada a estos: ITB 3.o o Intel Turbo Boost 3.o. En este artículo explicaremos qué hace dicha tecnología y cómo funciona.

Intel Turbo Boost 3.0: la versión avanzada tiene nuevas características

Como decíamos, Intel Turbo Boost es una tecnología que ha avanzado con los años y en base a estos ha ido evolucionando. La última versión dentro de 2.0 lograba incluir muchas mejoras que repercuten más allá de la frecuencia.

Pero Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 va un pequeño paso más allá que su versión inferior, ya que está desarrollada en conjunto con el sistema operativo Windows.

Esto es posible debido a distintas implementaciones de los de Redmond para con las arquitecturas HEDT de Intel. En sus primeras versiones ITB 3.0 necesitaba de una especie de driver, el cual entraba en una especie de simbiosis con las SKU del procesador.

Para lograr esto, Intel introdujo una nueva característica, donde definía en UEFI a uno de los cores como el «preferido». Este núcleo en dicho proceso de selección completamente automático sería el encargado de elevar su frecuencia por encima del resto cuando se necesitase.

Actualmente, dicho driver no es necesario puesto que Windows ha obtenido la compatibilidad de este de forma nativa, por lo que la función del mismo se realiza y habilita automáticamente.

Cuando el SO detecta la capacidad del procesador, ya sabe que núcleo es el preferido y todos los parámetros para elevar su frecuencia. Pero si queremos monitorizar dicha asignación, Windows no lo hace de forma transparente de cara al usuario, sino que oculta dicho procedimiento como si no pasase nada.

Para ver esto en tiempo real tendremos que utilizar Intel Extreme Tuning Utility, el cual sí nos mostrará cómo funciona en tiempo real ITB 3.0.

Intel Turbo Boost 2.o vs 3.0 ¿Cuáles son las diferencias?

Aparte de la evidente diferencia en el uso del núcleo preferido por Windows, lo cual es una gran ventaja para la plataforma, hay otra diferencia más a tener en cuenta y que varía con cada serie de procesadores: ITB 3.0 logra elevar la frecuencia de un solo núcleo más alto que en su versión 2.0 y a misma arquitectura de núcleo.

Por ejemplo, en Skylake y Skylake-X al comparar un i7-6700K con un i9-7900X lo que podemos ver es que en el primer caso su frecuencia sube solo 200 MHz, mientras que en el segundo logra 1 GHz exacto.

La diferencia es palpable sin duda, lo cual puede marcar la diferencia en según qué escenarios. Por último, solo los procesadores de la serie i7-5XXX en adelante (y siempre dentro de la gama HEDT de Intel) pueden disfrutar de esta tecnología, como por ejemplo los i7-6950X, i9-7980XE, i9-9900X o el más nuevo i9-10980XE, así como el resto de las series con dicha nomenclatura.

Debemos tener en consideración que dicha tecnología actualmente no funciona en sistemas operativos Windows de 32 bits, donde además es necesario que el SO sea Windows 10 RS5 o posterior para que lo haga de forma nativa, ya que de lo contrario tampoco ofrece soporte si no es mediante su correspondiente driver de configuración.

Tampoco podemos olvidar que, al igual que Intel Turbo Boost 2.0, esta versión 3.0 está sometida a los mismos factores para su correcto uso, como tipo de carga de trabajo, número de núcleos activos, consumo de corriente, consumo energético total, temperatura del mismo y compatibilidad de sus unidades de cálculo con el SO.

Además, el número de núcleos que se ha beneficiado de ITB 3.0 ha subido en cada generación, ya que Broadwell-e solo lo aplicaba a un núcleo, Skylake-X a dos y ahora con Cascade Lake-X llegará hasta a 4 núcleos.

Fuente: Hardzone.es

[gozealouscloudcollection]

AMD的黃金時代再臨？

訪問購買頁面:

AMD旗艦店

在以往，只���過一次，AMD能夠如此果斷地擊敗英特爾——2005年引入了雙核Opteron和Athlon 64 X2。而本週Epyc的推出則讓這種體會變得更大。 2005年，AMD的雙核與英特爾的內核數量相匹配，表現優於英特爾的時鐘和內核，並且相當昂貴。這一次，AMD正在尋求三連勝，因為它具有更高的性能、更多的內核和更低的每核定價。可以說，這是該公司對英特爾高端Xeon市場最嚴重的攻擊。

行業分析師已經預測，AMD的服務器市場份額可能在未來12個月內翻一番，到2020年第二季將達到10%。在數據中心市場中實現更大的份額是AMD的一個關鍵目標。更高的企業和數據中心市場份額不僅會增加AMD的收入，還有助於穩定該公司的財務業績。 AMD在過去二十年中的一個關鍵弱點是其對低端PC和零售渠道銷售的依賴。這兩個市場往往對經濟衰退敏感。低端PC市場也提供最低的每插槽收入和最小的利潤。衰退對企業商業周期的影響較小。 AMD在2005年至2006年間實現了大量企業市場份額的目標，當時其服務器市場份額突破了20%。

愛好者喜歡專注於AMD的桌面性能，但在遊戲之外，整體PC銷量正在下降。像二合一這樣的狹窄類別的增長並不足以抵消總體銷售下滑。雖然沒有人預計PC市場會出現失敗，但很明顯，2011年的衰退並非如此。對於擴大其在台式機和移動市場中的份額而言，AMD仍然有意義，但更有意義的是爭奪服務器領域的份額，其中收入和單位出貨量在過去8年中都有所增長。 2019年可能是服務器銷售的下滑年份，但將工作負載轉移到雲端的較大趨勢並未顯示出放緩的跡象。

為什麼Rome是���英特爾的威脅

在對Rome的討論中，我們主要關注Epyc 7742。這張來自ServetheHome的圖表顯示了Epyc與Xeon在更多SKU中的表現：

一對AMD Epyc 7742的售價為13900美元。 7502（32C/64T，2.5GHz基礎，3.35GHz增強，2600美元）的售價為5200美元。英特爾Xeon Platinum 8260的售價為4700美元，但其中有四款處於得分最高的系統中，總成本為18800美元。價值13900美元的AMD CPU為你帶來的性能比價值18800美元的英特爾CPU高出1.19倍。而四款E7-8890v4的售價將近3萬美元。一對Platinum 8280s是2萬美元，8676L的定價為16600美元。

但是，AMD不僅具有價格優勢，還有性價比優勢。英特爾大力細分其產品功能，並為它們收取更多費用，例如Xeon 8276,8276M和Xeon Platinum 8276L之間的價格差異。這三個CPU是相同的，除了每個支持的最大RAM量不同。

在這種情況下，“最大內存”包括英特爾Optane。這款4.5TB的RAM功能假設安裝了3TB Optane和1.5TB RAM。相比之下，所有7nmRome CPU都支持高達4TB的RAM。它是所有CPU的標準內置功能，簡化了產品購買和未來規劃。 AMD不只是以更低的價格提供芯片，而是採取英特爾的整個市場細分方法。當AMD願意以基本價格向你出售價值4TB的可尋址容量時，要想以8000美元獲得額外的RAM支持將會變得很難。

AMD與Epyc談論的一個問題是它如何在1S配置中提供2S系統的優勢。 ServetheHome的這張圖表很好地說明了這些差異：

AMD在這方面的優勢之一是它可以同時打擊多個英特爾的弱點。需要大量的PCIe通道？ AMD更好。想要PCIe 4.0嗎？ AMD更好。如果你的工作負載與內核進行最佳擴展，那麼每個插槽沒有人比AMD會銷售更多的內核。英特爾仍然可以獲得一些優勢——它提供了比AMD更大的統一L3緩存（每個AMD L3緩存實際上是16MB，每個內核有4MB片）。但是這些優勢將僅限於響應它們的特定應用。英特爾希望供應商投資建立對其Optane DC持久存儲器的支持，但目前尚不清楚有多少公司會這樣做。目前NAND和DRAM的最低價格使得Optane更難以在市場上競爭。

向7nm的轉變也使得AMD在功耗方面也具有優勢，特別是當考慮服務器退役時。 STH報告Xeon Platinum 8180的單線程功耗約為430W（壁功率），而AMD Epyc 7742系統的壁功率約為340W。然而，他們注意到，AMD最新CPU的高內核數將使他們能夠淘汰掉2017英特爾Xeons（60-80內核）的6-8個插槽，以便將工作負載整合到單個AMD Epyc系統中。淘汰3-4個雙插槽���務器所節省的功率遠遠大於兩個CPU之間不到90W的差異。

像DL Boost這樣的功能可能會給英特爾在人工智能和機器學習工作量方面帶來性能提升，但該公司將面臨一場明顯艱難的戰鬥，到目前為止，我們看到的數據表明這些因素可以幫助英特爾與AMD相匹敵，而不是擊敗它。

Xeon的成本是多少？

我們為這個故事引用的清單價格是英特爾為Xeon CPU發布的1K單位的正式價格。眾所周知，它們是不准確的，至少就主要的原始設備製造商而言。我們不知道戴爾、HPE和其他供應商實際為Xeon CPU支付的費用，但我們知道它通常遠低於定價，而定價通常僅由零售渠道支付。

英特爾清單價格與實際價格之間的差距可以解釋為什麼Threadripper沒有太大的市場滲透率。儘管Threadripper CPU兩年來已經提供了每美元大得多的內核以及每美元更高的性能，但分享銷售信息的OEM（如MindFactory）報告說，Threadripper和Skylake-X的銷售額非常低。然而，英特爾也沒有對削減Core X價格表現出特別的興趣。儘管AMD在這場比賽中表現出色，但它繼續定位10核Core i9-9820X作為Threadripper 2950X等芯片的競爭對手。這強烈暗示英特爾在向需要它們的OEM合作夥伴銷售10核CPU時沒有特別的麻煩，儘管Threadripper的性價比非常高，而且AMD在工作站市場的份額非常有限。

雖然英特爾已經削減其HEDT價格（2016年10核Core i7-6950X為1723美元，而今天Core i9-9820X為900美元），但它從未試圖與Threadripper進行性價比匹配。如果那個堡壘將崩潰，Rome將成為替代它的CPU。如果Epyc開始吞噬服務器市場，Ryzen和Threadripper將被視為更可信的工作站CPU。

AMD主導的遊戲

英特爾可以在短期內降低價格以應對AMD。從長遠來看，它必須直接挑戰AMD。這意味著以更低的價格提供更多內核，每個插槽支持更高的內存量。建於14nm的Cooper Lake將包括對新的以人工智能為主的AVX-512指令的額外支持，這款芯片將於明年上半年推出。該芯片將幫助英特爾專注於它想要競爭的一些市場，但它不會改變兩家公司之間的內核數差異。同樣，考慮到AMD願意在每個CPU插槽上支持高達4TB的內存，英特爾可能難以支付3000美元至7000美元的額外費用來支持2TB-4.5TB的RAM。

我們還不知道英特爾是否會增加Ice Lake服務器的內核數量，或者它將為市場帶來哪種設計，但服務器中的ICL至少需要一年的時間。當ICL服務器準備出貨時，AMD的7nm EUV設計也可能已經準備就緒。在與Rome一起開啟所有更新周期之後，AMD在未來12-24個月內的挑戰將展示持續順暢的更新節奏和持續的性能改進。如果確實如此，那麼它幾十年來一直致力於打造一種穩定企業市場的夢想將會成真。

不要變得自大

當AMD推出雙核Opteron及其消費類產品Athlon 64 X2時，有一種明確的感覺，該公司終於迎來了自己的時刻。一年多後，英特爾推出了Core 2 Duo。 AMD在接下來的11年裡一直在眾所周知的荒野中徘徊。後來，高管們承認該公司已經開始關注並因ATI的收購而分心。接下來則緊跟著一系列問題的產生。

簡單的假設是，P4 Prescott是一場英特爾也無法證明的災難。從歷史上看，攻擊英特爾經常被證明類似於用大錘擊打橡膠牆（雙關語）。使牆變形相對容易，但要想完全摧毀它是一項艱鉅的任務。 AMD可能有通過7nm Epyc佔領企業市場份額的最佳機會，但構建服務器份額是一個緩慢而謹慎的過程。如果AMD想要保持目標，那麼它需要以與2005年至2006年不同的方式發揮其作用。

但話說回來，我不會輕易使用像“黃金時代”這樣的短語。雖然我沒有預測它會持續多長時間，但就我而言，7nm Epyc的首次亮相可以讓我大膽的說：歡迎來到AMD的第二個黃金時代。

.

from AMD的黃金時代再臨？ via KKNEWS

[ansiklomedia]

Intel Broadwell-E Serisi Computex’te Tanıtılabilir İşlemci geliştirme konusunda yıllardır aynı çalışma modelini tercih eden Intel, geçen haftalarda tick-tock sistemini sonlandırdığını duyurmuştu. 

[yessgame]

Intel vs Amd taglio di prezzi in arrivo?

Intel vs Amd taglio di prezzi in arrivo?

La lotta a suon di prezzi potrebbe diventare interessante per gli acquirenti, infatti la nuova linea Ryzen 7 di AMD potrebbe costringere Intel a tagliare i prezzi dei suoi processori.

Le nuove CPU di AMD sembrano davvero molto competitive, e in molti casi il rapporto prestazioni/prezzo è decisamente migliore delle soluzioni Intel, cosa constatabile confrontando, ad esempio, la 1800X Ryzen con la…

[addongame-com]

Игровые новости от AddonGame https://addongame.com/news/oficialnye-sistemnye-trebovaniia-shadow-warrior-3-dlia-pk/

Официальные системные требования Shadow Warrior 3 для ПК

Devolver Digital и Flying Wild Hog только что обнародовали официальные системные требования ПК для Shadow Warrior 3.

Согласно спецификациям, для запуска Shadow Warrior 3 потребуется как минимум процессор Intel Core i5-3470 или AMD Phenom II X4 965. Также вам вам понадобится не менее 8 ГБ оперативной памяти и Radeon R7 260X или GeForce GTX 760. Что касается размера файлов игры, то вам потребуется не менее 31 ГБ свободного места на жестком диске.

Кроме того, для запуска Shadow Warrior 3 с максимальными настройками рекомендуется использовать AMD Ryzen 7 2700 или Intel Core i7-6950X. Flying Wild Hog также рекомендует использовать NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 или Radeon RX 5700.

МИНИМАЛЬНЫЕ:

Требуются 64-разрядные процессор и операционная система

ОС: Windows

Процессор: AMD Phenom II X4 965 (4 * 3400) или эквивалент. Intel Core i5-3470 (4 * 3200) или эквивалент.

Оперативная память: 8 GB ОЗУ

Видеокарта: Radeon R7 260X (2048 VRAM) или эквивалент. GeForce GTX 760 (2048 VRAM) или эквивалент

Место на диске: 31 GB

Дополнительно: Указанные минимальные спецификации позволяют играть в среднем при 30 FPS с использовании низких графических настроек и разрешении 1080p..

РЕКОМЕНДОВАННЫЕ:

Требуются 64-разряд��ые процессор и операционная система

ОС: Windows 10

Процессор: AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (8 * 3200) или эквивалент. Intel Core i7-6950X (10 * 3000) или эквивалент.

Оперативная память: 8 GB ОЗУ

Видеокарта: Radeon RX 5700 (8192 VRAM) или эквивалент. GeForce GTX 1080 (8192 MB) или эквивалент.

Место на диске: 31 GB

Дополнительно: Приведенные рекомендуемые характеристики позволяют играть в среднем при 60 FPS с высокими графическими настройками и разрешением 1080p.

Shadow Warrior 3 выйдет 1 марта 2022 года на ПК, PS4 и Xbox One.

По материалам: www.playground.ru

[amazingworkspaces-blog]

The My Overkill Home and Work Battlestations Workspace

Here are some of the products that make this workspace an Amazing Workspace:

MSI GAMING GeForce GTX 1070 8GB GDDR5 DirectX 12 VR Ready (GeForce GTX 1070 ARMOR 8G OC)

Intel Core i5 6600K 3.50 GHz Quad Core Skylake Desktop Processor, Socket LGA 1151, 6MB Cache (BX80662I56600K)

Inwin Development DFRAMEMINIBLACK Vibrant Open Frame ITX Chassis Cases D-FRAME Mini (Black)

PS4 Chat Cable w/ In-Line Remote & Volume Control for Astro Gaming Headsets & MixAmp- A30, A40, A50 - Talkback Lead - Gold Plated

Monoprice 108079 USB 2.0 to HDMI Display Adapter with Audio

Kwik-Cover KS3096PK-Z PKG. Zebra Kwik-Skirt With 30" X 96" White Cover Fitted Table Cover With Skirt, (1 full case of 10)

Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-75E250B/AM)

Samsung 950 PRO Series - 512GB PCIe NVMe - M.2 Internal SSD (MZ-V5P512BW)

PortPlugs for iPhone 5, 5s, 5c -Silicone Anti Dust Plugs; 2-in-1 Design Protects Lightning & Headphone Jacks Against Dirt, Sand & Splashes [Set of 5] (White)

Intel Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10 BX80671I76950X

Corsair Hydro Series H110i Extreme Performance Liquid CPU Cooler Cooling

Razer BlackWidow Chroma Clicky Mechanical Gaming Keyboard - Fully Programmable and 5 Macro Keys

Samsung U28E590D 28-Inch UHD LED-Lit Monitor with Freesync support

Logitech M510 Wireless Large Mouse - (910-001822)

Mean Robots Suck Transformers - 8 1/2"x 3 3/4" - Vinyl Die Cut Decal / Bumper Sticker For Windows, Trucks, Cars, Laptops, Macbooks, Etc.

Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB DDR4 3200 C16 DIMM 2400 MT/s

LG 34UM88-P 34-Inch 21:9 UltraWide QHD IPS Monitor with Thunderbolt

Corsair Vengeance 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3200 (PC4-25600) C16 for Intel 100, Red LED (CMU16GX4M2C3200C16R)

Corsair Carbide Clear 400C Compact Mid-Tower Case (White)

Corsair Gaming STRAFE RGB Keyboard, Multicolor LED, Cherry MX BROWN and Gaming Sabre RGB Gaming Mouse

NVIDIA GeForce Titan X Pascal 12GB GDDR5X (900-1G611-2500-000)

ASTRO Gaming A50 Wireless Dolby Gaming Headset - Black/Blue - PlayStation 4 + PC

Sticker Decal Flammable Liquid Red White Tablet Laptop Weatherproof Sp (6 X 6 Inches)

Acko Wifi LED HD Portable Mini Video Projector Bluetooth 1200 Lumens Home Theater 1080p USB HDMI VGA SD Player Computer Laptop Black

Type C and Quick Charger 3.0 Kitsf,Itian USB C Wall Charger K6B Quick Charger for Nintendo Switch/Google Pixel/Pixel XL/Nexus 6p/Nexus 5X,Regular Charger for Nokia N1(NOT SUIT FOR ALL LAPTOP)

iKBC Poker2 Mechanical Keyboard with Cherry MX Brown Switch, White

[bitcoinminershasrate]

Testing: Radeon RX 470 on ASUS ROG Strix video card - Overclocking | Benchmark

Testing the Radeon RX 470 on the example of the ASUS ROG Strix video card -In the line of new AMD video cards, we have not yet had time to consider only the Radeon RX 470. We will fix it in this article. Let's study the capabilities of the younger model on Polaris 10 in nominal and overclocked terms using a video card from ASUS as an example. Radeon RX 470 The Radeon RX 470 along with the Radeon RX 480 are based on a single Polaris 10 GPU that uses the latest fourth generation GCN architecture. But out of 36 Compute Units, the younger version has 32 active ones, i.e. instead of 2304 stream processors, the Radeon RX 470 operates with 2048 cores, 128 texture units out of 144 are active. In the new generation, the Compute Unit performance has been increased compared to previous solutions, and the memory bandwidth efficiency has been increased due to data compression algorithms. Therefore, the Radeon RX 470/480 are content with a 256-bit memory bus, but work with it faster than previous models. Improved geometry processing blocks, Async Compute operation. The L2 cache has been increased to 2MB. In addition to changes in the configuration of computing units, the Radeon RX 470 differs from the Radeon RX 480 also in operating frequencies. For the younger video card, the base GPU frequency is set at 926 MHz, and the Boost frequency is set to 1206 MHz. Relative to the frequencies of the Radeon RX 480, the difference in the maximum value is small, but at the base frequency it is almost 21%. GDDR5 memory operates at an effective frequency of 6600 MHz, which is also 21% lower than the memory frequencies of the older card. In terms of the configuration of the computing units, the Radeon RX 470 is closest to the Radeon R9 380X. At the same time, the TDP of the novelty is only 120 W thanks to the new 14-nm process technology. For comparisons, it should be recalled that the Radeon RX 480 is claimed to be 150 watts. Let's summarize the characteristics of new and old AMD Radeon video cards in one table. Video adapterRadeon RX 480Radeon RX 470Radeon R9 390Radeon R9 290Radeon R9 380XRadeon R9 280XCorePolaris 10Polaris 10GrenadaHawaiiAntiguaTahitiNumber of transistors, mln.pcs570057006020602050004313Process technology, nm141428282828Core area, sq. mm232232438438366352Number of stream processors230420482560256020482048Number of texture units144128160160128128Number of rendering units323264643232Core frequency, MHz1120–1266926–1206Up to 1000Until 947to 9701000Memory bus, bit256256512512256384Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5Memory frequency, MHz800066006000500057006000Memory size, MB8192/409640968192409640963072Supported DirectX Version121212121212InterfacePCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0TDP level, W150120275275190250 The Radeon RX 470 was originally announced with 4GB of video memory, but some manufacturers have already introduced 8GB models. Also, AMD partners immediately got the freedom to modify the RX 470 series cards, thanks to which many non-reference versions went on sale. Using such a video card as an example, we will get acquainted with the new product. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 470 (ROG STRIX-RX470-O4G-GAMING) The video card comes in a medium-sized box with a large, bright Strix lettering on the front. Supplied with a CD with software and instructions. Among the pleasant bonuses, it is worth noting two Velcro cable ties and a code for 15 days of "Premium" in World of Warships. ASUS is equipped with a large cooler with two large fans and heat pipes. Cooling is covered with a black plastic cover. The video card looks more solid than the reference version Radeon RX 480, which inspires respect and hopes for excellent temperature and noise characteristics. The austere appearance is complemented by an illuminated logo at the end. The board is full-sized, and not shortened as in the reference senior card. One power connector is located in the corner with the latch facing up. Disassembly of the video card is prevented by a seal on one of the screws. At the heart of the cooler are two thick 8-mm heat pipes that directly contact the surface of the graphics crystal. The tubes fit tightly together in the grooves of the base. The radiator is made up of a series of thin fins, which are pierced with heat pipes. A casing with a pair of Everflow T129215SM fans of a standard size of 100 mm clings to the radiator using latches. There are soft pads under the fans to dampen vibration. A separate heat sink is provided for the power supply transistors. Let's take a look at the board. A stiffener is screwed on the side to avoid deformation of the PCB. The GPU power system is located on the right side, has four phases. The memory power supply subsystem is two-phase. The Polaris 10 chip is surrounded by a massive frame, the crystal itself is unmarked on the surface. Four gigabytes of memory are recruited with SKhynix H5GC4H24AJR R0C microcircuits. ASUS STRIX-RX470-O4G-GAMING operates at higher frequencies. Initially, the core frequency was increased to 1270 MHz, which is the maximum value. The base frequency is not indicated in official sources, but it can be assumed that it is at 990 MHz or even higher. Memory without factory overclocking. For monitoring and overclocking, we used the ASUS GPU Tweak II application, which provides maximum control and management of the operating parameters of the new Radeon graphics cards from ASUS. Note that many of the features are available in the standard WattMan application from AMD Radeon Settings. Video cards with GAMING attachment support several operating modes. In this case, 1270 MHz corresponds to the most productive OC Mode. When you select the Gaming Mode settings profile, the frequency is reduced to 1250 MHz, in Silent Mode to 1230 MHz. We limited ourselves to the initial settings during testing. And even in this mode, the real GPU frequency varied greatly in the load and was noticeably below 1270 MHz. When loaded with the Metro: Last Light benchmark at 2K at maximum quality (bottom left screenshot), the frequencies were not just below 1200 MHz, but with drawdowns almost up to 1100 MHz. About the same picture was observed in Tom Clancy's The Division, although there were already peak values ​​at 1270 MHz. On the reference video card Radeon RX 480, the frequency spread was less, although the standard version does not have good cooling. Here, the heating is no more than 60 ° C at 25 ° C indoors. This value is used in AMD WattMan as a temperature limiter, but the video card barely comes close to it, so the main role in lowering frequencies is played by a severe power limitation. Note also that apart from weak heating, ASUS also pleased with the minimum noise, which is not surprising at a fan speed of less than 1400 rpm. The ASUS graphics card will also replace the regular version of the Radeon RX 470 by simply reducing the core frequency to 1206 MHz. How are things going with overclocking? Initially, ASUS managed to reach frequencies close to 1.4 GHz, but with a significant increase in operating voltage. By increasing the power limit to the limit (150% of the initial level), it was possible to obtain an almost stable frequency with minimal deviations below the maximum level. But after trying hard games, problems began. At very high voltages, the frequency could go down even at low temperatures, or periodic "freezes" appeared. There were freezes and other crashes. As a result, I had to stop at 1350 MHz with a minimum voltage increase of 12 mV in the ASUS GPU Tweak II utility. In this configuration, the only problem was the rare freezes, which appeared only in a couple of applications, but we simply did not take such results into account when calculating the average data. The memory was overclocked to 7556 MHz. The fan speed was forcibly increased to approximately 1900 rpm. A certain noise in this mode was noticeable, but without any serious discomfort. As you can see from the screenshots, the core frequency was kept at the maximum of 1350 MHz, the deviations were minimal. Moreover, this time the drawdowns are more pronounced in The Division, but still not lower than 1335 MHz. So the real gain in frequencies should be pretty good. As for heating, at the selected fan speed, the peak core temperature did not exceed 71 ° C. Characteristics of the tested video cards The performance of the Radeon RX 470 will be compared to the older Radeon RX 480, Radeon R9 290, GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 970 graphics cards from the recent Radeon RX 480 benchmark. The technical characteristics of all participants are described in the table. Video adapterRadeon RX 480Radeon R9 290ASUS ROG Strix RX 470Radeon RX 470GeForce GTX 1060GeForce GTX 970CorePolaris 10HawaiiPolaris 10Polaris 10GP106GM204Number of transistors, mln.pcsn / a60205700570044005200Process technology, nm142814141628Core area, sq. mm232438232232n / a398Number of stream processors230425602048204812801664Number of texture units14416012812880104Number of rendering units326432324856Core frequency, MHz1120–1266Until 947990–1270926–12061506–17081051–1178Memory bus, bit256512256256192256Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5GDDR5Memory frequency, MHz800050006600660080007010Memory size, MB819240964096409661443584 + 512Supported DirectX Version121212121212InterfacePCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0PCI-E 3.0Power, W150275120120120145 Test stand The test bench configuration is as follows: - processor: Intel Core i7-6950X (3.0 @ 4.1 GHz); - cooler: Noctua NH-D15 (two NF-A15 PWM fans, 140 mm, 1300 rpm); - motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99P-SLI; - memory: G.Skill F4-3200C14Q-32GTZ (4x8 GB, DDR4-3200, CL14-14-14-35); - system drive: Intel SSD 520 Series 240GB (240 GB, SATA 6Gb / s); - additional disk: Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 (1 TB, SATA 3Gb / s, 7200 rpm); - power supply unit: Seasonic SS-750KM (750 W); - monitor: ASUS PB278Q (2560x1440, 27 ″); - operating system: Windows 10 Pro x64; - Radeon RX 470 driver: AMD Grimson 16.7.3; - driver Radeon RX 480 and R9 290: AMD Grimson 16.6.2; - GeForce GTX 1060 driver: NVIDIA GeForce 368.64; - GeForce GTX 970 driver: NVIDIA GeForce 368.39. The test methodology described in one of the previous articles is taken as a basis. But since there was used a configuration of settings for top-end video cards, then in this comparison for some applications simpler parameters are used in accordance with the configuration of settings that were used in testing the Radeon RX 480. Test results Batman: Arkham Knight In Arkham Knight, the difference between Radeon RX 470 and Radeon RX 480 is about 10% in average frame rate and more than 20% in minimum fps. Initially, the junior card is slightly weaker than the Radeon R9 290 and GeForce GTX 970, but this is easily overclocked. At maximum frequencies, it is possible to overtake the GeForce GTX 1060 in the nominal value. Battlefield 4 The new Radeon is inferior to the old man R9 290 in the game Battlefield 4, losing along the way to the GeForce GTX 970. After overclocking, the Radeon RX 470 reaches the performance level of the Radeon RX 480. The increase from increasing frequencies is 15%. DiRT Rally Another test, where the old Radeon R9 290 prevails over the novelties based on Polaris 10. There is a 13% difference between the Radeon RX 470 and the Radeon RX 480, and the younger participant just compensates for the gap due to his overclocking. DOOM In the DOOM shooter, the Radeon RX 470 has a minimal lag behind the Radeon R9 290. In overclocking, all three AMD demonstrate similar results. As a supplement, we present the test data of the Radeon RX 470 in the Vulkan API. You can measure fps in this mode only with the Action! And only in windowed mode. The latter may somehow affect the accuracy of measurements, but the general trend can be seen. The transition to Vulkan speeds up the beginner by 30%, which is an impressive result. Fallout 4 The Radeon RX 470 is inferior to less than 9% of the GeForce GTX 970 and up to 14% of the Radeon RX 470 in Fallout 4. The gain from overclocking makes it possible to compensate for the lag behind its older comrade. Far Cry Primal Radeon RX 470 is inferior to Radeon RX 480 by about 13-15%. The lag behind the GeForce GTX 970 in Far Cry Primal is minimal. Overclocking provides ASUS acceleration by 16%. Gears of War: Ultimate Edition The game uses the heaviest graphics settings with 4K textures And even with this mode, the Radeon RX 470 copes very well, overtaking the GeForce GTX 970. The newcomer has less drawdown in fps, and the minimum parameter is equal to the GeForce GTX 1060. Although in this particular case, these readings should be treated with caution, not forgetting to focus on average indicators. Grand Theft Auto 5 The same minimum fps for Polaris models in GTA 5, which can be explained by the newer driver for the younger card. In terms of the average frame rate, the new product hardly differs from the Radeon R9 290 and GeForce GTX 970. Overclocking allows you to bypass the Radeon RX 480. Just Cause 3 Radeon RX 470 in Just Cause 3 is minimally inferior to its closest rivals - Radeon R9 290 and GeForce GTX 970. The lag from the older model of the new series is less than 15%, this is compensated by overclocking. Moreover, the increased frequencies allow you to slightly bypass the Radeon RX 480 in the nominal value. Metro: Last Light Although the Radeon RX 470 loses to the GeForce GTX 970 in Last Ligh, it demonstrates good fps in high resolution, which is nice in itself. The difference with the Radeon RX 480 is almost 17%, but the gap is compensated for after increasing the frequencies of the Radeon RX 470. Quantum Break Excellent performance for the Radeon RX 470 in Quantum Break. At the initial frequencies, the video adapter takes an average position between the GeForce GTX 970 and the GeForce GTX 1060. The gap from the Radeon RX 480 is at the level of 16-17%. With overclocking, the younger comrade compensates for this gap, at the same time it is possible to slightly bypass the GeForce GTX 1060 in nominal value. Rise of the Tomb Raider The Radeon RX 470 struggles to deliver barely acceptable fps in Rise of the Tomb Raider at very high quality in Full HD, but overclocking allows you to bring the performance to a more comfortable level. It's nice that the newcomer is faster than the Radeon R9 290. The difference with the Radeon RX 480 is at the level of 23–32%, which is also due to the high memory capacity of the older friend. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt The hero of the review in The Witcher 3 loses to the GeForce GTX 970 only in average frame rate. Lagging behind Radeon R9 290 at 6%, lagging behind Radeon RX 480 at 15-17%. Overclocking provides over 20% acceleration, allowing you to get as close as possible to the performance of the GeForce GTX 1060 Tom Clancy's The Division The outsider in The Division is the Radeon R9 290. The newcomer is a little faster. ASUS at factory frequencies is on a par with GeForce GTX 970. The difference between Radeon RX 470 and Radeon RX 480 is up to 15%, overclocking accelerates the former by 17–19%. Additionally, testing was carried out at a higher resolution as a stress mode. The general alignment of forces changes little, except that the Radeon R9 290 gains an advantage over the Radeon RX 470. The ratio with the older Polaris remains at the same level. Total War: Warhammer New test in a new game. A special benchmark with DirectX 12 support was used. Here the Radeon RX 470 is on a par with the Radeon R9 290 and confidently bypasses all competitors from NVIDIA. XCOM 2 At the initial frequencies, the Radeon RX 470 is inferior to a few percent of the GeForce GTX 970. The difference with the Radeon RX 480 in XCOM 2 is up to 17%, but the younger video adapter fully compensates for it after its overclocking. 3DMark 11 The new Radeon is noticeably inferior to the GeForce GTX 970 in this test, but overclocking minimizes the gap. The difference between Radeon RX 470 and Radeon RX 480 is almost 19%. 3DMark Fire Strike In this test, the lag behind the GeForce GTX 970 is less, so the increase in frequencies makes it easy to overtake the competitor. The difference with the Radeon RX 480 is about 15%. Energy consumption The measurements were made according to the previously described method, but without taking into account the data of the older video cards in Total War: Attila. At par, the Radeon RX 470 has extremely low performance against the background of its comrades from the AMD camp. The difference with the Radeon R9 290 is especially impressive. The newcomer wins the GeForce GTX 970 by this criterion. But the first place in terms of economy remains with the GeForce GTX 1060. It is also worth noting that the situation changes dramatically during overclocking, the power consumed by the Radeon RX 470 increases. conclusions AMD strengthens its position in the middle class with the release of the Radeon RX 470 graphics card. The novelty, which in all respects should replace the Radeon R9 380X, is closer in performance to the Radeon R9 290, yielding only a few percent to the old model. The lag behind the Radeon RX 480 is on average 15%, but it happens even more. A higher memory capacity can be an important factor in the advantage of an older video card based on GPU Polaris 10. At the same time, the potential of the Radeon RX 470 with 4 GB is not only enough for Full HD, in some games the video card can handle 2K resolution. In new demanding games, especially under DirectX 12, the Radeon RX 470 is a direct competitor to the GeForce GTX 970, although in slightly earlier projects the new product is weaker. All this is combined with low energy consumption and a low suggested price, It should be noted that the low level of power consumption in the nominal is associated with severe restrictions. For this reason, the Radeon RX 470 has a floating core frequency, which can be noticeably lower than the declared 1206 MHz. In this regard, the new Radeon are beginning to resemble the GeForce. And, as you may have noticed, we even began to indicate on the performance graphs the full frequency range of the Radeon core instead of one final value. The reviewed ASUS ROG STRIX-RX470-O4G-GAMING video card pleased with low heating and minimal noise. A high-quality cooling system copes well with its tasks during factory overclocking, which, however, provides minimal acceleration. To squeeze the most out of the video card, you need to increase the power and temperature limit along with the frequencies. The final overclocking by ASUS can be safely called successful, because our sample managed to pass the tests at a stable core frequency of 1350 MHz, although it felt like the limit of possibilities. With overclocking, ASUS managed to catch up (and sometimes overtake) the Radeon RX 480. This acceleration is associated with a sharp increase in heat dissipation, but the cooler can cool the card without serious noise even in this mode. So we can safely recommend ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 470 for purchase! Read the full article