#Confessions of Nat Turner
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
cynthiabertelsen · 2 months ago
Text
The [Fatal] Flaw*: What’s Wrong with [Food] Writing Now
Writing is not about the “me,” it’s about the “not me.”  This is always true, even in personal essay and memoir. ~~ Michael Ruhlman Something seems wrong these days with food writing in America. And, to be honest, not just food writing. What is the problem? You’re probably getting ready to hit DELETE. But hold on, hold on, please. The other day, trying to come to grips with some rather negative…
0 notes
tabithatwo · 2 years ago
Text
Lottie kidnapping Nat so she can’t kill herself <3 Taissa saying Shauna’s poor and Natalie’s a drug addict <3 Shauna saying I would kill your spouses and actually I quite enjoy murder in general <3 Misty claiming she would NOT kill their spouses (she would) <3 Van judging like she’s not as fucked <3 NATALIE SAYING GUYS CAN WE JUST TALK PLEASE <3 lottie saying lol no talking actually my wellness cult is a sham your lives all suck kys <3
347 notes · View notes
devskindawritingblog · 1 year ago
Text
Yellowjackets Materialist
Click to help Palestine 🇵🇸 🍉
Tumblr media
( I mostly write x reader but the ones that are character x character will have a ❤️ after the link)
Lottie Matthews 1996
Christmas headcannons
Gingerbread chaos
Faux Love
Tumblr media
Lottie Matthews 2021 Pottery
Tumblr media
Natalie Scatorccio 1996 Christmas headcannons
Unexpected Christmas
Jealousy,jealousy
Ghostface!Nat
And I love her
Tumblr media
Shauna Shipman 1996
Christmas Headcannons
Transmasc!shauna
Christmas Confessions
Jackie’s twin sister
Tumblr media
Jackie Taylor 1996 Christmas headcannons
Gift of warmth
Tumblr media
Van Palmer 1996
Christmas headcannons
Wrapped in love
Ghostface!TaiVan
Princess!Taissa x Knight!van❤️
Taivan movie date ❤️
Tumblr media
Misty Quigley 1996
Christmas headcannons Soccer Bells
Tumblr media
Misty Quigley 2021
Bandages
Jealous? (She is with it )
Tumblr media
Taissa Turner 1996
Christmas headcannons
Family Christmas
Ghostface!TaiVan
Princess!Taissa x Knight!van❤️
Taivan movie date ❤️
Tumblr media
Laura Lee 1996
Christmas headcanonns Drunken Love
Bumps and bruises
Tumblr media
Mari 1996 Mari Fluff Headcannons
Tumblr media
I will update this whenever I post a new fic . Or I will add a new thing I write for one of the older versions and I have the link to this in my pinned post . <3
56 notes · View notes
3rdeyeblaque · 1 year ago
Text
Today marks the 192nd anniversary of the Southampton Insurrection of 1831. On THIS day we remember & honor those who fought in King Nat's rebellion, the deadliest in U.S. history. ✊🏾
Tumblr media
At age 21, Nat Turner was a Seer, considered a prophet, & a runaway slave in Southampton Co., Virginia. He had a series of 3 visions that would set him on course to fulfilling his higher calling & forever impressing his name upon history as the spearhead of rebellion.
In his 1st vision, Spirit instructed him to return to his "master's" plantation. One year later, the devil died. Three years later In 1831, Spirit delivered his 2nd vision; lights in the sky. Nat prayed to learn their meaning. On May 12th, he received his 3rd and final vision - a solar eclipse. This, he believed to be the sign he had been promised. War had come. He confided this in his four most trusted allies - Brother Henry, Brother Hark, Brother Nelson, & Brother Sam.
Tumblr media
On, August 13th, there was an atmospheric disturbance in the sky which caused the Sun to appear bluish-green in color. This affirmed the work that needed to be done. Thus, on August 21st, King Nat and six of his allies met in the woods to discuss their final plans over dinner.
Tumblr media
At 2am on August 22nd, they struck - on foot and on horseback. They struck the Travis household first; killing the entire family as they lay asleep. They continued their crusade from house to house, killing every single devil in their path. King Nat's force grew to 40 warriors, most on horseback.
Come noon, they marched toward the neighboring town of Jerusalem. By then word of the rebellion had spread among to the Whites who confronted them as a militia, which drove King Nat's forces to scatter into division and confusion. At nightfall they hid near slave cabins. They attempted to strike yet another house, but were met with force. Several of Turner's allies were captured. The remainder would face-off against State and Federal troops in a final skirmish the next day. One rebel was killed, the rest - along with Nat - successfully escaped. Between August 22nd - 23rd, King Nat and his allies stabbed, shot, and beat the hell out of 55 white slavers, making it the deadliest slave rebellion in U.S. History.
Tumblr media
Ultimately, the State of Virginia executed 55 rebels, banished many freefolk, and acquitted very few. The State reimbursed the slavers for their losses. Yet the most major impact of the rebellion was the hysterical climate that followed. Nearly 200 "Black" folk, both free and enslaved, were murdered by white mobs. Enslaved folk as far south as North Carolina were accused of having a connection with the insurrection, and were subsequently tried and executed. The State legislature of Virginia considered abolishing slavery, but in a very close vote decided to retain it and to support a repressive policy against the free & enslaved.
Tumblr media
Let us remember that it was more than bravery, nerve, & standing ten toes down that drove King Nat's rebellion to success. It was, first and foremost, leading with Spirit & trusting in our intuitive/Ancestral gifts. It was UNITY, ORGANIZATION, & LOYALTY amongst ourselves. We put the FEAR of their god in them. We did not turn the other cheek and we damn sure did harm. We freed ourselves from their shackles; in body, in mind, and spirit. It was because of King Nat's visions that freedom & force was made manifest.
"... While laboring in the field, I discovered drops of blood on the corn, as though it were dew from heaven, and I communicated it to many, both white and black, in the neighborhood; and then I found on the leaves in the woods hieroglyphic characters and numbers, with the forms of men in different attitudes, portrayed in blood, and representing the figures I had seen before in the heavens." - King Nat; excerpt from, "Confessions of Nat Turner".
We pour libations of water, blow tobacco smoke, speak their names, & offer prayers toward the elevation of King Nat, all who fought alongside him, & all those who perished in the sea of White Fear in the aftermath.
54 notes · View notes
peach-and-bugs · 2 years ago
Text
Yellowjacket dialogue requests
so, I'm getting back into writing regularly again and so I started with just jotting down different dialogues with varying feeling behind them and I thought they could pair really well with some Yellowjackets work bc I love my girls!
Willing to do self-insert or character x character, platonic, romantic, or smut. just pick a character/pair, a quote, and clarify if they're a teen or adult!
Also! Heads up!: I’ve been getting some requests without a quote with them, which is fine, but I’ll be privatizing those with requested quotes first!
Yellowjackets: romantically (➵ ) platonically (✸) or nsfw (✧)
Jackie Tayler (1996) ✸ ➵
Laura Lee (1996) ✸ ➵
Lottie Matthews (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
Misty Quigley (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
"Nat" Natalie Scatorccio (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
Shauna Sadecki (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
Taissa Turner (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
Travis Martinez (1996/2021) ✸ ➵
"Van" Vanessa Palmer (1996/2021) ✸ ➵ ✧
dialogue:
1. “You keep staring at me…” “Oh, do I? I hadn’t noticed.” “how do you not notice it when you're staring at someone for an extended period of time? Natalie (2021) x fem!reader
2. “You sound like you’re dad, you know that?” “ugh, don’t remind me,” Travis (1996) x reader
3. “I have a confession.” “you better not confess to a murder, because I can’t deal with that right now” Misty (2021) x fem!reader
4. “I thought you stopped smoking. You smell like cigarettes again” Natalie (2021) x fem!reader
5. “Wow, you really never got out of you’re angsty teenager phase, did you?” Shauna (1996) x fem!reader
6. “I feel like you’ve got a hand on me at all times,” “Maybe that’s because I’m irrationally afraid that you’ll disappear on me if I let go,” Shauna (2021) x fem!reader Lottie (2021) x fem!reader
7. “Please tell me you didn’t hold on to that all these years” Lottie (2021) x fem!reader
8. “Mmm, before we do anything else can you please go brush your teeth for me?” Lottie (1996) x fem!reader
9. “ok, chin up and take a breath for me. You’re tuning purple,” Van (1996) x fem!reader
10.  “When have I ever come across as a person that takes any interest in children to you? Van (2021) x fem!reader
11.  “Does every word out of your mouth need to be a movie quote?” “no, sometimes I quote television”
12.  “I didn’t miss you. But now you're here and… god, fuck me,” Natalie (1996) x fem!reader Lottie (1996) x fem!reader
13.  “You’re shirt’s inside out,” “How do you know I didn’t do that on purpose” Van (2021) x fem!reader
14.  “Don't be a smart ass right now, I'm not in the mood,” Misty (2021) x fem!reader
15.  “You look exhausted, you know that? Natalie (1996 pre-crash) x fem!reader
16.  “I can be happy with however you’ll have me,”
17.  “I don’t remember your hands being so callous,” Misty (2021) x fem!reader Travis (1996) x reader
18.  “My mother would end me if she found out about this”
19.  “Fuck, who doesn’t school prepare you for these kinds of things!”
20.  “Can you let go of my collar? You’re choking me a little,” “Aw, I thought you liked that?” Natalie (1996) x fem!reader Lottie (2021) x fem!reader Misty (2021) x fem!reader
67 notes · View notes
nicklloydnow · 3 months ago
Text
“Ta-Nehisi Coates’s fundamental problem is that he is a narcissist. Other people interest him only insofar as they reflect his own thoughts and feelings. That is what makes him such a bad reporter, a shortcoming he freely admits to. “Part of me would have done anything to go home,” he writes in his new book The Message, about his 10-day trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories in the summer of 2023. “The part that always grouses about the rigors of reporting, the awkwardness of asking strangers intimate questions, the discipline of listening intently.” Readers, if listening to other people is a chore, then journalism might not be the career for you.
It could also be that Coates hates reporting because he is bad at it. Every reporter knows the a-ha moment of living through the anecdote that will make the perfect lead or kicker. No such perfect anecdotes have ever happened to Coates or, if they did, he was oblivious to them. His previous book, Between the World and Me, was an indictment of America as a racist hellscape, yet the worst act of racism he recounted from his own life—not something he read about in a newspaper or a history book—was a white lady on an escalator who shouted at his dawdling son, who was blocking her way, “Come on!”
(…)
The conclusion he comes to is that the Jewish state is the equivalent of the Jim Crow South. “I don’t think I ever, in my life, felt the glare of racism burn stranger and more intense than in Israel,” he writes. “‘Jim Crow’ was the first thing that came to mind, if only because ‘Jim Crow’ is a phrase that connotes an injustice, a sorting of human beings, the awarding and stripping of the rights of a population. Certainly, that was some part of what I saw in Hebron, in Jerusalem, in Lydd.”
If his luck had been different, and he were less self-involved, Coates could have come up with a better checkpoint anecdote than the lame one he offers. Something like the incident in November 2009 when a Palestinian music teacher on his way to teach a lesson was held at the Beit Iba checkpoint and forced to take out his violin and play it while Israeli soldiers laughed. There you have something more than inconvenience, a vivid and poetic illustration of the dehumanization ordinary Palestinians often face. There, too, you have a rebuttal: The 2001 Sbarro pizza shop bombing in Jerusalem, which killed 16 Israelis including a pregnant woman, was committed by a Palestinian who hid his bomb in a guitar case.
These are the kinds of complexities Coates has no time for. Since he first publicly embraced the Palestinian cause, his liberal friends have been telling him that the issue is complex. “Horseshit,” he told the New York magazine interviewer. Palestine is no more complicated than slavery or segregation. “It’s complicated,” he said, “when you want to take something from somebody.” When the interviewer asked him about Hamas’s attack of Oct. 7, 2023, Coates compared it to Nat Turner’s slave rebellion: “I would’ve been one of those people that would’ve been like, ‘I’m not cool with this.’ But Nat Turner happens in a context.”
The real reason Israel bothers Coates so much is something he waits until the very end of the book to confess:
Israel felt like an alternative history, one where all our [Marcus] Garvey dreams were made manifest. There, ‘Up Ye Mighty Race’ was the creed. There, ‘Redemption Song’ is the national anthem. There, the red, black, and green billowed over schools, embassies, and the columns of great armies. There, Martin Delaney is a hero and February 21 is a day of mourning. That was the dream—the mythic Africa . . . What I saw in the City of David was so familiar to me—the search for self in an epic, mythic past filled with kings.
There you have it. The problem with Israel is that it shames him. How can it be that the Jews carved their Israel out of the desert, and yet no place in Africa, least of all Liberia, remotely resembles Wakanda?
Earlier in the book, Coates talks about his 2014 Atlantic article “The Case for Reparations,” which cemented his status as America’s most prominent public intellectual. “In the months before the article was published, I felt that I had at last discovered the answer to the haunting question of why my people so reliably settled at the bottom of nearly every socioeconomic indicator,” he writes. “The answer was simple: The persistence of our want was matched exactly to the persistence of our plunder. I was blessed with a gift, and the gift was not simply the knowledge that ‘they’ were lying (about us, about this country, and about themselves), but the proof.”
What he loved most about that article, in other words, was the feeling of finally being able to blame all the problems of black America on other people. Israel took that away from him. All the excuses for why his father’s black paradise remained a fantasy applied equally to the Jews, but they overcame the hostility of the world to succeed where Garvey & Co. failed. That, and not any resemblance to Jim Crow, is the reason Coates hates Israel so bitterly.
(…)
For a while, it looked as though a similar divorce might happen again in our day. Many liberals were genuinely shocked by the support for Palestine on college campuses in the wake of the Oct. 7 attack. It caused many to rethink their support for “wokeness” and its crude division of the world into oppressors and oppressed, evil whites and blameless people of color. Wealthy liberals like Bill Ackman defected. Suspicions of anti-Semitism among Black Lives Matter activists, which The New York Times had covered as far back as 2018, gained new credence as campus protesters chanted “From the River to the Sea” and some embraced paraglider iconography. The tensions threatened to bring about a split in the left as far-reaching as that of the 1970s.
There is little reason to expect a replay of history, however. The demographics have changed too much. In 1970, the American electorate and Harvard’s undergraduate student body were both close to 90 percent white. Today. the situation is very different. Last year, people of color made up a majority of children under 18 and a majority of every Ivy League freshman class, except at Dartmouth. At the same time, Jewish enrollment at Harvard is lower than it was during the bad old days of quotas in the 1920s. Demographics don’t perfectly predict political opinions, on this issue or any other, but defectors from the left may be surprised to discover that wokeness, the ideology of valorizing all people of color, has quite enough inertia to carry on without their help.
The future we face is encapsulated in an anecdote that occurred when Coates stopped pontificating to himself and listened to other people for a change. Avner, who leads a group of former Israeli Defense Force soldiers who now favor a more liberal policy toward the Palestinians, is showing Coates around the West Bank with their driver Guy. Coates asks these two Israelis what they would do differently if they were in charge. Avner says he favors self-determination for both peoples. “The question is, can there be a way to have the right to self-determination for Israelis and to Palestinians? I think the answer is yes, there has to be. I mean, there’s no other way.”
Guy doesn’t have time for Avner’s waffle. “I see the establishment of Israel as a sin. I don’t think it should have happened,” he says. “It’s something I can’t live with. And I think in order to have some kind of sustainable, reasonable life here, there should be a real change.”
Coates was instrumental in bringing American elites from having Avner’s view to Guy’s, in respect of their own country. Before, America was flawed but redeemable; now, it was sinful from Day One, founded on slavery and plunder. This line sounded good to many American liberals when its implications weren’t entirely clear. It is much easier to see what abolishing the occupier state means in the context of Israel. The idea shocks many Americans. Whether the future belongs to the liberalism of yesterday or the wokeness of tomorrow will depend on their ability to apply the lessons of that shock to their own case.”
“And here is where I largely agree with him: The problem Israel faces isn’t morally complicated at all. It might have been on October 6, 2023. But after October 7, things got simple.
The terrorist organizations Coates whitewashes or ignores openly and proudly insist that they want Israel destroyed. I’m not even referring to those insipid chants of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!” one hears from Western apologists for terrorism. I mean that their leaders and founding documents plainly state that their goal is to eradicate Jews and their country.
Hamas and Hezbollah have never been subtle or ambiguous: They want Israel gone and the Jews living there dead or exiled. The Houthis’ official slogan is “God Is the greatest, death to America, death to Israel, a curse upon the Jews, victory to Islam.” Coates could find this out by spending five minutes on Wikipedia.
When someone clearly expresses an intent to murder you and your family, a lot of complexity melts away.
And when they back up their words with actions, things get simpler still. A year ago, Hamas launched a brutal attack in which they murdered men, women, and children; raped women; and kidnapped hundreds. This wasn’t the rhetorical cosplay we’ve seen on American college campuses. This was a deliberate and wanton slaughter of civilians. And in the wake of the attacks, Hamas’ leaders vowed to repeat them again and again.
Except for the issue of retrieving their hostages and adhering to the laws of war rejected entirely by Hamas, Israel’s options were decidedly uncomplicated. And that’s why Coates’ cartoonish understanding of Israel and the Palestinians is so pernicious.
(…)
If you tell the Israelis that compromise is pointless because their country should not exist or be able to defend itself, they will simply ignore you, and rightly so. And if you tell Americans they must choose between terrorist organizations that proudly rape and murder civilians and a democratic ally that doesn’t promise death to America, the odds are good that they’re going to pick the latter.
If Palestinians had eschewed violence in favor of peaceful resistance and moral suasion, they probably would have had a viable state long ago. But Palestinian leaders and Arab governments rejected that approach for decades. Indeed, the Oct. 7 attack was intended to prevent such an approach. The normalization of relations between Israel and Arab governments was a major motivation for it.
Coates and his defenders insist that they want “moral clarity” on the conflict. I believe moral clarity is on Israel’s side. It’s a democracy whose Muslim and Arab citizens have rights that they wouldn’t enjoy in most Arab and Muslim countries. Israel tries to protect civilians and is called genocidal. Hamas calls for genocide, and they are called victims.
I could go on, but even if you reject such facts as irrelevant, Hamas has forced Israelis to either defend themselves or die. Such a choice makes everything clear and simple very quickly. Israel’s flaws vanish before that existential test. That’s why complexity is the only hope the Palestinians have.
Tumblr media
“Supporting Ukraine and Israel is morally right and advances America’s strategic interests. Siding with Russia against Ukraine or with Hamas against Israel, by design or negligence, is un-American. Ukraine and Israel are faced with life-or-death threats to their populations and to their democracies. But their struggles are also a test for our democracy, which has served as a beacon of hope and stalwart supporter of these kinds of fights for freedom and democracy throughout the world for generations.
(…)
Hamas and Russia are first and foremost enemies of Israel and Ukraine, but not exclusively. They will continue to unleash terror around the world until they are stopped. It is essential that the U.S. provide Israel and Ukraine everything they need to fight and win: anti-missile defenses, ammunition, access to intelligence, humanitarian assistance, training and more. The aid both countries are requesting, combined, is a minuscule percentage of the U.S. budget — defense or domestic. But that aid could mean the difference between victory and defeat for Israel and Ukraine and for the future of democracy across the globe. Israel and Ukraine are not asking one single American soldier to risk their life. All they want is for us to give them the tools so that they can do the job.
This is an inflection point for democracy and freedom. We have seen with our own eyes, in real time, the barbarism of both Hamas and Russia. The torture and slaughter of civilians — women, children and elderly, unarmed and begging — and the capture of hostages to serve as human shields are acts not of war but of terror. We cannot stand idly by, bearing witness without providing help. That’s not the American way.
For their sake, for our sake, for the world’s sake, we must fully support Israel and Ukraine in their struggle, in our collective struggle, against the darkest forces of human nature.”
“Asked about antisemitism in Ukraine today, Korniychuk links his index finger to his thumb to indicate zero.
After all, other than Israel, Ukraine is the only country in the world that simultaneously had a Jewish president and a Jewish prime minister. Volodymyr Groysman served as prime minister from 2016 to August 2019. For the latter part of that period, Volodymyr Zelensky was already president, having come into office in May 2019, and it was common knowledge that both Volodymyrs were of Jewish parentage
(…)
How many Ukrainians live in Israel? As registration is not compulsory, Korniychuk cannot give an exact figure. Although 15,000 are registered, he estimates that there are approximately half a million Russian-speaking Ukrainians who have made their homes in Israel, plus a large number of Israelis who are entitled to Ukrainian passports.
Of the Ukrainians in Israel, 2,500 including dual nationals, left during the first two weeks of the war. During the first two weeks of the war in Ukraine, some 1,400 people lost their lives, says Korniychuk, underscoring that this is approximately equal to the number of people killed by Hamas during the massacre.
Korniychuk notes that Israel was essentially founded by Ukrainian Jews, who though they came to reestablish a Jewish homeland, nonetheless carried Ukraine in their hearts.
(…)
Inasmuch as the hostage situation and the war in Gaza continue to occupy the attention of the international media, Korniychuk sees this waning soon in the same way that interest in the war in Ukraine has waned.
The longer that the war goes on, he says, the greater the need to keep up awareness.”
5 notes · View notes
dynamobooks · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
William Styron: The Confessions of Nat Turner (1967)
1 note · View note
en-fuego · 1 year ago
Text
Nat Turner Born October 2, 1800
Nat Turner was a renowned African-American known for leading the 1831 slave rebellion to free blacks in Southampton County, Virginia, after being subjected to slavery himself. He started a revolt among the black slave followers to free their brother on several plantations. They gained more arms and horses with each raid on plantation. Afterwards, they were accused of 50 white civilians’ death and the Virginia legislation began to target free blacks as well with a colonization bill implicating their freedom once again with sale and relocation. In their rage and fear of uprising, white Americans organized troops and attacked the blacks resulting in over 150 deaths regardless of their involvement in the slave rebellion.
Turner was born into slavery on October 2, 1800 in Southampton County, Virginia. His master Benjamin Turner named him Nat and upon his death Nat’s ownership was transferred to Benjamin’s brother Samuel. During Civil War era he was referred to as Nathaniel according to the sources. He didn’t know much about his father as he reportedly escaped from slavery when Turner was young. He spent most of his life in Southampton County, Virginia, a plantation area. The place was mostly populated by the enslaved laborers. Turner was a highly intelligent person who learned to read and write at a very young age. Moreover, he had deep religious sentiments and was often seen praying, fasting and reading bible. His spirituality enabled him to have these visions which he interpreted as messages from God. These visions had a great impact on his understanding of life and which led to his return to his owner after running away a month before. His followers labeled him ‘The Prophet’, as he often conducted baptizing services and preached bible to his fellow slaves.
In 1928, Nat Turner had a realization that he was ordained for some great purpose and later it turned out to be the freedom of his fellow salves. He started to interpret weather as a sign from God to begin revolt against their owners. In early 1831, an annular solar eclipse was seen in Virginia which Turner saw as a sign to prepare an uprising. He waited till Independence Day to strike but had to further postpone the rebellion due to his illness. Then there was another solar eclipse which quickened Turner’s plan. Thus the uprising began on August 21. The message of initiating the rebellion was communicated through songs in the village and soon around 70 black slaves gathered in the woods and from there they went on from plantation to plantation to free their enslaved brothers.
So as not to alert the enemies of their presence, they carried out their attacks through knives, hatchets, axes, and blunt objects. The assault went so far as they killed 60 white people without discrimination of age and gender. They spared the poor whites as they were treated no better than the blacks. Nat Turner was driven by the single-minded goal to free the blacks that he didn’t even mind resorting to violence. He thought it would help the whites to see the cruelty of their act of slave-holding. However, the rebellion was suppressed within two days. Turner evaded the capture by hiding out in the woods but was eventually found in a hole covered with fence rails. Upon his confession to having knowledge of rebellion, he was tried and hanged for conspiring to rebel and making insurrection on November 11, 1831.
0 notes
jebwizard · 2 years ago
Text
Until Such Time...
“It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are 20 gods or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” ― Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia & Confession of Nat Turner Until such time as a person who is… White, hurts me Or Black, hurts me Or gay, hurts me Or Muslim, hurts me Or atheist, hurts me Or had an abortion, hurts me Or Catholic, hurts me Or Jewish,…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Ah! Which Grantaire ramble, can you please remind me?
With every respect and in the spirit of amicable debate, I feel Hugo basically addresses your Nat Turner point in 1.1.10 in the Bishop's debate with Conventionist G——, quoted below the cut.
The Bishop felt, without, perhaps, confessing it, that something within him had suffered extinction. Nevertheless, he put a good face on the matter. He replied:— “The judge speaks in the name of justice; the priest speaks in the name of pity, which is nothing but a more lofty justice. A thunderbolt should commit no error.” And he added, regarding the member of the Convention steadily the while, “Louis XVII.?” The conventionary stretched forth his hand and grasped the Bishop’s arm. “Louis XVII.! let us see. For whom do you mourn? is it for the innocent child? very good; in that case I mourn with you. Is it for the royal child? I demand time for reflection. To me, the brother of Cartouche, an innocent child who was hung up by the armpits in the Place de Grève, until death ensued, for the sole crime of having been the brother of Cartouche, is no less painful than the grandson of Louis XV., an innocent child, martyred in the tower of the Temple, for the sole crime of having been grandson of Louis XV.” “Monsieur,” said the Bishop, “I like not this conjunction of names.” “Cartouche? Louis XV.? To which of the two do you object?” A momentary silence ensued. The Bishop almost regretted having come, and yet he felt vaguely and strangely shaken. The conventionary resumed:— “Ah, Monsieur Priest, you love not the crudities of the true. Christ loved them. He seized a rod and cleared out the Temple. His scourge, full of lightnings, was a harsh speaker of truths. When he cried, ‘Sinite parvulos,’ he made no distinction between the little children. It would not have embarrassed him to bring together the Dauphin of Barabbas and the Dauphin of Herod. Innocence, Monsieur, is its own crown. Innocence has no need to be a highness. It is as august in rags as in fleurs de lys.” “That is true,” said the Bishop in a low voice. “I persist,” continued the conventionary G—— “You have mentioned Louis XVII. to me. Let us come to an understanding. Shall we weep for all the innocent, all martyrs, all children, the lowly as well as the exalted? I agree to that. But in that case, as I have told you, we must go back further than ’93, and our tears must begin before Louis XVII. I will weep with you over the children of kings, provided that you will weep with me over the children of the people.” “I weep for all,” said the Bishop. “Equally!” exclaimed conventionary G——; “and if the balance must incline, let it be on the side of the people. They have been suffering longer.”
We already know about Hugo's feelings on John Brown, an American abolitionist executed for role in the 1859 raid/rebellion at Harpers Ferry, but given that Nat Turner's rebellion occurred in 1831, I'm really curious
1) What Hugo's thoughts and feelings were (or would have been if he'd known about it) at that time, and
2) If the Amis would have taken notice, if they might have taken action (a la Hugo writing to the US government in an attempt to gain sympathy/a pardon for Brown), or if they would have continued focusing on exactly what's in front of them in France.
Besides Feuilly's Poland comment (in canin he is explicitly described as having adopted the world, so this is somewhat unsurprising coming from him), which does indicate some knowledge of politics outside of France's realm of direct influence, I'm not sure I recall any of the Amis ever discussing the current events of other countries. Even France's colonial holdings at that time e.g. Haiti I don't recall ever being explicitly referred to by the Amis. Does their mission extend to Paris, to France, to France and "her holdings," or the world?
25 notes · View notes
onebluebookworm · 3 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
My wonderful girlfriend took me to Left Bank Books for the first time a few weeks ago. It’s the oldest independently owned bookstore in St. Louis, and was one of the first bookstores in the city to offer counterculture, anti-establishment, and feminist literature wholesale to consumers. It was also the first gallery in the United States to display the artwork of illustrator Mary Engelbreit.
So naturally, I went a little bananas in there.
Pictured: We Are Never Meeting in Real Life by Samantha Irby, Hood Feminism by Mikki Kendall, Jesus and John Wayne by Kristen Kobes du Mez, and The Confessions of Nat Turner by William Styron. 
5 notes · View notes
universitybookstore · 5 years ago
Link
Remember it well.
5 notes · View notes
lakecountylibrary · 7 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
This book was checked out in 1969 and just made its way back to us this month (January 2018). It’s been out for 48 years and 7 months! Luckily, Rick returned it during Amnesty Month, so no worries.
Rick told us he checked it out just as he graduated high school - and then immediately got married and started his first job in the steel mills. In all the confusion, it just didn’t get returned. It became part of his collection for the next several decades, and was well cared for as you can see from the fact that its original date due card is still tucked in the back pocket (note also the price of the book written on the pocket - $6.95. That might seem cheap for a hardcover today, but $6.95 back then had the same buying power as about $47 today!)
Here’s the text of the note Rick included when he returned it:
1969: Sesame Street aired for the first time, Vietnam War was in full swing, Elvis was King, Neil Armstrong lands on the moon, The Beatles were on Abbey Road, The Manson Family terrorized a country. This book has survived two marriages, four children, six grandchildren, and five new homes. Nine presidents: Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, G. Bush, Clinton, G.W. Bush, Obama, and Trump. Now I am retired and I think this book should be retired as well. Please accept this book as part of your Amnesty Program.
Happily, Rick. Thank you, and welcome back to the library.
180 notes · View notes
meret118 · 3 years ago
Text
Unfortunately, so many books are in the crosshairs of the censors—around 850 on one list in Texas alone—that we can’t talk about all of them. But here are some of the books that haven’t made individual headlines when they were banned.
The books below don’t just appear on Texas state Rep. Matt Krause’s 16-page list of books to investigate—a list that was more than 60% LGBTQ-themed books, according to one analysis. They might also be books pulled from the shelves in Granbury Independent School District, in Texas; or Polk County, Florida; or targeted by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott. Those books are also heavily LGBTQ. Interestingly, the American Library Association's top 10 most-challenged books of 2020 list is less LGBTQ—though the top book on it, by Alex Gino, was George, since retitled Melissa. The books below are in no particular order. All Boys Aren't Blue, an essay collection by journalist and LGBTQIA activist George Johnson that was included on best books of 2020 lists from Kirkus Reviews, the New York Public Library, and others. Echo Brown’s Black Girl Unlimited, described as “just brilliant” by Kirkus. Susan Campbell Bertoletti’s They Called Themselves the K.K.K.: The Birth of An American Terrorist Group, which won the American Library Association’s 2011 award for excellence in nonfiction for young adults. Adam Rapp’s 33 Snowfish, one of the Young Adult Library Services Association's top 10 books for young adults in 2004. Carmen Maria Machado’s In the Dream House is an award-winning memoir about an abusive lesbian relationship. Separate is Never Equal: Sylvia Mendez and Her Family’s Fight for Desegregation, by Duncan Tonatiuh. Ordinary Hazards, by Nikki Grimes, is a memoir that got starred reviews in six major trade journals, among other honors. Maia Kobabe’s Gender Queer is a memoir in graphic novel form. It was an ALA Alex Award winner that got a starred review from the School Library Journal. Drama, by Raina Telgemeier, is an LGBTQ-themed graphic novel that won multiple awards and made multiple year’s best lists, but was also the seventh-most-banned book between 2010 and 2019, according to the American Library Association. Gabi, a Girl in Pieces, by Isabel Quintero, made the best books lists at both Kirkus and the School Library Journal in 2014. Ash, by Malinda Lo, was on the Kirkus best young adult books list in 2009. More Happy Than Not, by Adam Silvera, got starred reviews at Publisher’s Weekly, Kirkus, School Library Journal, and Booklist, as well as making many best-of lists in 2015 and thereafter. Two Boys Kissing, by David Levithan, has made repeated appearances on the ALA's most banned books list. It was also on the National Book Awards longlist for young people’s literature. The Hate U Give, by Angie Thomas, was a well-reviewed, massive young adult bestseller, with Kirkus Reviews calling it “necessary” and “important” in a starred review. The School Library Journal also gave it a starred review. It was a Coretta Scott King Honor book. The list goes on. And on and on and on. We could have a whole section on winners of the Pulitzer Prize or National Book Award that some school boards just aren’t sure belong in schools. It’s not just Maus. Fences, by August Wilson. Beloved, by Toni Morrison. Between the World and Me, by Ta-Nehisi Coates. The Confessions of Nat Turner, by William Styron. Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, which won the 2007 National Book Award for Young People’s Literature. Or books by authors who’ve won those awards for their other work, like Morrison’s The Bluest Eye, which the College Board actually uses as an example for AP exam preparation. Or Isabel Wilkerson’s Caste.
20 notes · View notes
peach-and-bugs · 4 years ago
Text
Ask Box Headcanons and Blurbs
my account is always open for short, one-off headcanon requests for any character on my master list. But here is where I'm storing links to all of my headcanons on Tumblr!
Marvel 
Agatha Harkness
giving Kathryn Hahn characters big threes
Passing Notes Headcanons
Layla El-Faouly/Scarlet Scarab
cuddly Layla
Parks and Rec
Jennifer Barkley
General Jen Headcanons
Yellowjackets
Whole Yellowjackets Team
What would the Yellowjackets study and major in college (no crash)
Yellowjackets as parents/with kids
Yellowjackets Favorite Taylor Swift Albums & Songs
Yellowjackets & their pronouns
Yellowjackets with Pets (Lottie, Natalie, Shauna & Van)
What instruments would the Yellowjackets play?
Yellowjackets looking after reader after top surgery (modern au)
Jackie Tayler (1996)
Dating Jackie pre & post crash
Laura Lee (1996)
Lottie Mattews (1996/2021)
Jealouse Lottie
cuddling Lottie
taking care of Lottie (1996) after a soccer game
Lottie (2021) finding out her partner's pregnant (NSFW)
Lottie (1996 & 2021) Helping her girlfriend during a panic attack
Lottie with a partner that's always playing with her hair
Lottie (1996) caring for her girlfriend after wisdom teeth removal
Lottie (2021) with a forgetful girlfriend
Lottie trying to tease her partner (NSFW)
Lottie and movies - pt 1 - pt 2 - pt 3 - pt 4
Lottie trying to get intimate with her partner (NSFW, 18+)
Lottie when she's in a fight with her partner
Older sister Lottie (1996)
Lottie confesses her feelings (1996 & 2021)
Misty Quigley (1996/2021)
Misty with a clumsy partner
jealous Misty
Misty getting taken care of
Misty and movies
Misty with a partner who's always taking her clothes
"Nat" Natalie Scatorccio (1996/2021)
A relationship with Natalie Scatorccio (1996 & 2021)
Shauna Sadecki (1996/2021)
Taissa Turner (1996/2021)
"Van" Vanessa Palmer (1996/2021)
Van (2021) realizing she's in love with you
Van (1996 & 2021) helping her girlfriend during a panic attack
A relationship with Van Palmer (1996 & 2021)
Van when she's in a fight with her partner - pt 2
Van is autistic
Dating Van in college
Bean Sprout Questions
Random Mama!Lottie Headcanons
Lottie gentle parenting & mom names
1996 & Bean Sprout
Lottie talking about 1996 w/ her wife
Lottie's schizophrenia
babywearing Lottie
granola mom Lottie
Lottie dressing Baby Matthews - Pt 1 & Pt 2
Lottie's hair
Misty's Role & Godparents
Baby Yoga
Travis
Lottie & boobs (Pregnant partner, NSFW 18+)
More of Lottie with her pregnant s/o
JackieShauna
JackieShauna & TaiVan raising kids
TaiVan
Taissa & Van comfort their partner on their period
JackieShauna & TaiVan raising kids
MistyNat
Poly relationship with Misty (2021) & Natalie (2021)
Misty (2021) & Natalie (2021) with an easily startled partner
Misty and Natalie with a cuddly partner
MistyLot
Lottie (2021) and Misty (2021) fighting over the same girl
Misty & Lottie find out someone likes their girlfriend
Why I love MistyLot and why it should be canon
LottieNat
Lottie (2021) & Natalie (2021) comfort their partner when they've got period cramps
29 notes · View notes
spaceorphan18 · 3 years ago
Text
Season 1 Songs in Chronological order of release
A couple of things
Duplicates were eliminated
Broadway songs were done by when the show premiered
A few of the songs are the release dates of the versions popularized by other artists - such as Over the Rainbow - to reflect the artists they chose to emulate 
Mash ups were broken up, and songs are treated individually here
If you guys enjoy this - I’ll make ones for the rest of the show, including an comprehensive list. ;) 
1936 -"Sing, Sing, Sing (With a Swing)" - Louis Prima 1936 - "Smile" -Nat King Cole 1937 - "The Lady Is a Tramp" - Sammy Davis, Jr. 1950 - "Sit Down, You're Rockin' the Boat" - Guys and Dolls 1956 - "I Could Have Danced All Night" - My Fair Lady 1957 - "Tonight"- West Side Story 1959 - "Rose's Turn" - Gypsy: A Musical Fable 1960 - "Where Is Love? -"Oliver! 1963 - "It's a Man's Man's Man's World"- James Brown 1964 - "Don't Rain on My Parade" - Funny Girl 1964 - "A House Is Not a Home" - Dionne Warwick 1964 - "Funny Girl" - Barbra Streisand 1966 - I Say a Little Prayer" - Dionne Warwick 1966 - Maybe This Time” - Cabaret 1966 - "Cabaret" - Cabaret 1966 - "You Keep Me Hangin' On" - The Supremes 1967 - "Respect" - Aretha Franklin 1967 - "Hello, Goodbye" - The Beatles 1967 - "To Sir, with Love" - Lulu 1968 - Young Girl - Gary Puckett & The Union Gap 1968 - "Hello, I Love You" - The Doors 1968 - "Dream a Little Dream of Me" - The Mamas and the Papas 1969 - "Leaving on a Jet Plane" - John Denver 1969 - "Sweet Caroline" - Neil Diamond 1969 - "Proud Mary" - Ike and Tina Turner 1969 - "You Can't Always Get What You Want" - The Rolling Stones 1970 - "One Less Bell to Answer - The 5th Dimension 1971 - "You're the One That I Want" - Grease 1971 - "Imagine" - John Lennon 1972 - "Lean on Me" - Bill Withers 1973 - "Piano Man" - Billy Joel 1973 - “Dream On" - Aerosmith 1974 - "(You're) Having My Baby" - Paul Anka and Odia Coates 1974 - "Tell Me Something Good" - Rufus and Chaka Khan 1975 - "Mister Cellophane" - Chicago 1975 - "All by Myself" - Eric Carmen 1975 - "Home" - The Wiz 1975 - "Run Joey Run" - David Geddes 1975 - "Give Up the Funk - "Parliament 1975 - "Bohemian Rhapsody" - Queen 1976 - "Somebody to Love" - Queen 1976 - "Shout It Out Loud" - Kiss 1976 - "Beth" - Kiss 1978 - "Le Freak" - Chic 1978 - "Fire" - The Pointer Sisters 1979 - "Highway to Hell" - AC/DC 1979 - "Lovin', Touchin', Squeezin'" - Journey 1980 - "Another One Bites the Dust" - Queen 1980 - Any Way You Want It - Journey 1981 - "Don't Stop Believin'" - Journey 1981 - "Endless Love" - Lionel Richie and Diana Ross 1981 - "And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going" - Dreamgirls 1981 - "Hello Again" - Neil Diamond 1981 - "Physical" - Olivia Newton-John 1981 - "Jessie's Girl" - Rick Springfield 1982 - "Dancing with Myself" - Generation X 1982 - "The Safety Dance" - Men Without Hats 1983 - "Alone" - Heart 1983 - "Jump" - Van Halen 1983 - "Total Eclipse of the Heart" - Bonnie Tyler 1983 - "Pink Houses" - John Mellencamp 1983 - "Faithfully" - Journey 1984 - "Can't Fight This Feeling" - REO Speedwagon 1984 - "Hello" - Lionel Richie 1984 - “Borderline" - Madonna 1984 - "Like a Virgin" - Madonna 1985 - "On My Own" - Les Misérables 1985 - Walking on Sunshine - Katrina and the Waves 1985 - "I Dreamed a Dream" - Les Misérables 1986 - Don't Stand so Close to Me  - The Police 1986 - "Papa Don't Preach" - Madonna 1986 - "Hair" - Hair 1986 - "True Colors" - Cyndi Lauper 1986 - Open Your Heart - Madonna 1987 - "Push It" - Salt-n-Pepa 1989 - "Bust a Move" - Young MC 1989 - "Express Yourself" - Madonna 1989 - "Like a Prayer" - Madonna 1990 - "Poison" - Bell Biv DeVoe 1990 - "Vogue" - Madonna 1990 - "Ice Ice Baby" - Vanilla Ice 1990 - "U Can't Touch This" - MC Hammer 1990 - "Over the Rainbow" - Israel Kamakawiwoʻole 1991 - "I Wanna Sex You Up" - Color Me Badd 1991 - "Good Vibrations" - Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch 1992 - "One" - U2 1993 - "Loser" - Beck 1994 - "I'll Stand by You" - The Pretenders 1995 - "This Is How We Do It" - Montell Jordan 1998 - "The Boy Is Mine" - Brandy and Monica 2000 - It's My Life - Bon Jovi 2000 - "Thong Song" - Sisqó 2001 - "Ride wit Me" - Nelly feat. City Spud 2001 - "Bootylicious" - Destiny's Child 2001 - "What It Feels Like for a Girl" - Madonna 2002 - "Beautiful" - Christina Aguilera 2003 - "Defying Gravity" - Wicked 2003 - Crazy in Love - Beyonce 2004 - Confessions Part II - Usher 2005 - "Gold Digger" - Kanye West feat. Jamie Foxx 2006 - "Rehab" - Amy Winehouse 2006 - "Keep Holding On" - Avril Lavigne 2006 - "Smile" - Lily Allen 2007 - "Taking Chances" - Céline Dion 2007 - "Hate on Me" - Jill Scott 2008 - "I Kissed a Girl" - Katy Perry 2008 - "Take a Bow" - Rihanna 2008 - "Mercy" - Duffy 2008 - "Bust Your Windows" - Jazmine Sullivan 2008 - "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" - Beyoncé 2008 - "Last Name"Carrie - Underwood 2008 - Halo - Beyonce 2008 - "No Air" - Jordin Sparks and Chris Brown 2008 - "Gives You Hell" - The All-American Rejects 2008 - "4 Minutes" - Madonna feat.Justin Timberlake  2008 - "Poker Face" - Lady Gaga 2009 - "My Life Would Suck Without You" - Kelly Clarkson 2009 - "Bad Romance" - Lady Gaga
30 notes · View notes