#CelebrityObsession

[lolol2324566]

Stop Offering Spiritual Guidance ( tarot readings and spiritual readings) if you cant do it properly 😉🙏

Stop Offering Spiritual Guidance you clearly don’t understand the responsibility that comes with giving spiritual readings. The reading you gave me was shallow, dismissive, and full of assumptions. You didn’t even bother to dig deeper or treat my question with respect. Instead, you decided to write me off as if I were just another obsessed fan, which shows how little you actually care about the people paying you for your so-called “services.”If you can’t handle providing real insight or treating all clients equally, maybe you should stop pretending to be a spiritual guide. Charging people for readings and then dismissing them? That’s not spirituality—it’s fraud.Your responses to others clearly show you’re capable of being thorough and considerate, so the way you treated me makes it obvious you’re selective about who gets your effort. That’s not professionalism. That’s arrogance and laziness.If this is how you think spiritual work should be done, you need to stop. Immediately. You’re harming people who come to you in good faith, and it’s disgusting. Reflect on that—or don’t. Honestly, I doubt you care enough to change.

So I just want to say this to the people that are getting readings by others that actually don't go into account about this actual energy. They just assume so much don't pay for readings or get insight from people that don't really understand where you're coming from. This goes for everybody and the whole community and the whole spiritual community. I'm actually pissed off and the fact that there's actual tarot readers that think that they can tap into actual other people's energies is such a f****** lie. Get it right and I know the Right audience will see this and understand what I'm talking about. I'm done. Y'all are frauds fakes and y'all like to think that y'all can. Since y'all know the funk y'all can play the funk. Y'all cannot play the funk cuz you know it. Some people can actually do the funk and play it. Just cuz you know it doesn't mean you're meant to do it so stop.

To All Tarot Readers Who Take Advantage of People if you're out here offering "readings" and treating people like they're just another fan or their questions don’t deserve real insight, then yes, I’m talking about you. It’s not enough to take someone’s money and give them shallow responses or dismiss them based on assumptions. If you can’t offer real depth and respect, maybe it’s time to rethink your approach to spirituality. People deserve authenticity, not manipulation. This isn't just a personal issue—it’s a bigger problem that needs to be called Out to Those Tarot Readers Who Exploit Celebrity Obsession stop using people's infatuation with K-pop idols and celebrities to sell false hope or spiritual insight. You're not doing anyone a favor by feeding into parasocial relationships or exploiting their fantasies for a paycheck. It's one thing to offer guidance, but it's another to encourage unhealthy obsessions and reinforce delusions. You claim to be “spiritual,” but all you’re doing is cashing in on people's emotional vulnerabilities. It's time to stop using idols as pawns in your readings and actually respect your clients as individuals, not just walking dollar signs.

Message to All Who Seek Spiritual Guidance,

I want to take a moment to talk about something important that goes beyond my personal frustration with one specific experience. Spiritual guidance is supposed to be sacred—meant to uplift, heal, and guide us on our paths. But unfortunately, not everyone in the spiritual community is offering what they claim to be.

We need to be cautious when seeking readings or spiritual advice. Just because someone offers services doesn't mean they have the integrity or depth to give real, thoughtful insights. There are people out there who will take your money, give you shallow responses, and even dismiss you based on assumptions, especially if they believe you're just another "fan" or a part of some parasocial relationship.

Real spiritual work requires empathy, genuine connection, and a willingness to go beyond surface-level answers. If someone is too quick to judge, not willing to dig deeper, or treats you like your questions don’t matter, that’s a red flag. This is your energy and your time, so trust your intuition. If someone doesn’t resonate with you in a respectful, compassionate way, it’s okay to walk away and find someone who truly understands and values the work.

Please, don’t settle for mediocrity or get caught up in the facade. Protect your energy. Be mindful of who you give your trust—and your money—because not everyone who claims to be a guide is actually equipped to lead you with authenticity. Stay aware, stay empowered, and keep your journey true to who you are. 💘 I've seen a lot of readings on here on Tumblr and I dig deep and it's clear to see that nobody is clocking anything like how do you even know what you're doing for real for real like come on now????

I said what I said and that's it. The gif is the energy I'm giving!!!

[fitness-trending-content]

The disturbing obsession with "barely legal" women 🔞 💃🎟️ https://newsinfitness.com/the-disturbing-obsession-with-barely-legal-women/

[celebritysanity]

pathetic

“There’s not harm in having a few posters and following 15 Twitter ‘update’ accounts of Frank Famousface-”

Honey, you know more about what Frank had for dinner last night than about tomorrow’s midterm. 

“I’m only focusing on Frank because I’m not currently in a relationship-”

Check up on your cause/effect logic.

“I have a community when I-”

A community of what? Is your 'community' providing you with any concrete benefits or ways in which to model your behaviour so you can substantially improve your life?

“It makes me feel good.”

In the moment, maybe...but tomorrow? Next week? In five years, when you realise the only thing you have to show for any work on your goals in the past 5 years is 20 GB of screenshots? I bet you’ll feel pathetic. 

Junk food entertainment is well and good, but there's a limit to how much healthy emotional investment you can have in a celebrity.

[fnu1]

Look at me! Look at me! The Insta-Star - The 'Fnuglystate' collection. #instafamous #streetcred #celebrityobsession #streetwear #hiphopfashion

[uponfurtherreview-mark]

Do you know who Kimberly Howe is? 

Oh, you don't? 

Well, Kimberly Howe was a 69 year old woman who lived in Calabasas and was driving the PCH this week when her car was rear ended and she was pushed into oncoming traffic where a hummer slammed into her car and ended her life. 

Any of this ringing a bell? 

Oh, I apologize. Maybe I should have asked if you know about the Bruce Jenner Accident. 

There, now I see you all nodding in affirmation about that. Yes, how stupid of me to talk about the victim of the accident and not talk about how Bruce Jenner was in an accident, especially at this very precarious time in his life where tabloid fodder has made mention more times than I can count that he might be "transitioning" into a new role gender wise. 

Talk about completely misrepresenting a story and what is truly important and that is a person has died and that three others,  children nonetheless, were injured in what is being dubbed "The Bruce Jenner Accident". How about Bruce is mentioned as having a hand in this issue, but then tone down the story because it is, after all, a story of tragedy and loss, more so than anything else. 

Yet this accident has become more tabloid sensationalism, an article to get clicks, to feed a celebrity obsessed culture who I doubt bothered to think of the victims if only to use it as context into something that happened to Bruce Jenner and then the victims fade into the background; afterthoughts to more pressing issues, which is that Bruce Jenner, reality star, step-father to three other reality stars, and who might be on a "journey" to become another sex. 

This is just another case of celebrity focus trumping the victim. Ever since the OJ trial where the victims of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were just a plot device, a mere afterthought to the fame and celebrity that was OJ Simpson and his murder trial. And after the media saw how us, the viewers, ate it up and could not get enough of tragedy involving a celebrity, the media has made it a point to shine the lights brightest on society's upper echelon when reporting grave situations involving stars. 

And even when a celebrity, like Phil Spector, is found guilty, the celebrity still dominates the headlines and the victim, well, it might as well be "What victim?" All the coverage in the world never makes mention of them and their life and how this tragedy has created a ripple effect for their family and friends. Instead, the finger on the pulse maintains that the true story is not about life, the true story is about celebrity and our cultural need to know it, consume sit, revel in it. 

Not once in looking though article, after article, after article, after article, did I see much about the victim. Instead, I read about Bruce, Bruce's suffering, Bruce's Pain, Bruce running from the paparazzi, Bruce texting while driving, Bruce is lucky he drove an escalade. 

But what about the victim's of what Bruce did? Any mention of them other than a small blurb saying they were hurt and one person, a woman, was dead? Nope.

The social hierarchy wins out when we discuss any event because famous people move the needle and the rest of us mere mortals are just sacrifices to their alter. 

And not only is that sad, but it is wrong. As a society we should not devolve into mindless, star gazing fanatics; more concerned with the well being of celebrity than to the more important aspect of life itself. And life is bypassed in this case because our society gravitates more toward star status consumption due to its immediacy, its quickness and immediate disposability, and that we can make jokes and comments that degrade Bruce, all in good fun, but really is more of a slap at how little sensitivity and value we have placed on those who were truly affected by this incident. And when the media is not giving the victims any thought then why would the rest of society? We are, after all, just taking our cues from what we see and hear on our nightly newscast, our Facebook and twitter feed, and web home pages. So what if we don't know Kim Howe or any of the other victims. They were not famous so what is the big deal?

The big deal is that the tragic events of this weekend is microcosm of a greater societal problem where many regular, not famous at all, run of the mill citizens get lost in someone else's story. They fall victim to celebrity adulation, becoming just a faceless, nameless, cog in our social hierarchy buzz that focuses on ratings and drawing people in, but does not pay the respect due to those who are the true victim of a crime. 

This is not "The Bruce Jenner Accident". This is the death of Kim Howe. A 69 year old woman who met her end too soon, who had family, friends, and others who will miss her. People who will never get to say goodbye and who will never see a person they cared about again. 

Kim Howe deserves more than to be a minor character in Bruce Jenner's continuing reality series. She was the victim here. 

Kim Howe's story should be front and center on this stage. And that it is not is the real crime. 

[teentimessocial]

[sisterkatie]

ABC REPORT - Celebrity Obsession

This was posted on ABC and thought I would share and read it. 

  How Your Celebrity Obsession Could Get You Scammed

  Aug 24, 2014, 6:26 AM ET

Getty Images

We all have our areas of interest — make that obsession — and when something related to them crops up online, we can be instantly transformed into monster click-machines. The problem here: Many of those clicks can either lead to your victimization or becoming an unwitting co-conspirator in cybercrime.

To make matters worse, once your computer is infected, it can become a soldier in a zombie army — aiding and abetting a variety of online crimes — not to mention a conduit for transmitting your information to people who view the theft of your data as their day job.

In the best-case scenarios, the objects of our passion and mania are used by unscrupulous click farmers to trick you into helping them make money. Usually this has to do with artificially driving up traffic or social interaction for a product or site, but there are plenty of worst-case scenarios.

Here are some common tactics and items that will, unfortunately, sound all too familiar to you.

1. Celebrities

Recently, it was Robin Williams (or worse yet, this week’s tragic beheading in the desert), but any celebrity or high-profile person will do. And it doesn’t have to be a murder or death—Justin Bieber getting arrested is a sufficient catalyst. When the news goes into real-time mode, scammers come out of the woodwork offering bread and circuses to the world: the panache of what’s missing — something new.

Sometimes there’s malware attached to the video or “breaking news.” Or in the case of Robin Williams, there was no video and no malware. Instead, the Robin Williams links circulated on Facebook sent users to a fake BBC site, which required them to share the video on Facebook before they could see it. The result: an avalanche of posts about a nonexistent video.

The same click-stealing method has been associated with the real death of Amy Winehouse and the fake death of many others. Celebrity sex tapes follow a similar path. The bottom line at the user end is that if the content you want to view requires an action on your part, the only action you should take is to close that window in your browser.

2. Your Facebook Friends

Facebook is the second most-trafficked site on the Internet. When it comes to your time and productivity, Mark Zuckerberg has given us the ultimate gift that keeps on taking.

Because the herd is so large, scammers have spent a lot of time hatching schemes for harvesting everything from clicks and “likes” to the kinds of personally identifiable information that can be used to commit serious financial fraud, health insurance fraud and a host of identity-related crimes. And it all depends on your obsession with what your friends are talking about this hour.

Here is a list of common Facebook scams. But the rule of thumb is simple: If you aren’t sure about something on the second biggest site online, go to the number one trafficked site – Google — and check it out before you click. Don’t just blindly “like” a friend’s Facebook post without knowing what’s behind it.

3. Cat Videos

The way hackers work this particular scam is very specific and most likely not one that need overly concern you (unless you’re a terrorist or happen to own or run a large corporation with trade secrets that are worth billions in the grubby little fingers of a rival nation state).

The Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto studies the way information moves—including the way it can be filtered and grabbed and re-routed. A recent report detailed leaked information about software that took advantage of the flow of clear-text data used on YouTube (the opposite of encrypted data, which is how email and other sensitive information moves around the Internet).

The technique detailed by Citizen Lab created a very sophisticated man-in-the-middle hack that allows nation states to place surveillance software on a target computer. The underlying assumption: Even the bad guys watch cat videos.

Could it become available to a crime ring or terrorists who want to create data havoc? Of course it could. Worry level: SNAFU.

4. Pornography

Let’s say “someone” is clicking on pornographic images. Then suddenly a window pops open showing something truly revolting—and illegal—followed immediately by a message informing the voyeur that his or her device is locked, but can be unlocked for a $300 penalty fee. That’s known as the FBI ransomware scam. The idea is that you’ll pony up some cash just so no one ever has to know what you were viewing at the time.

The most recent version of this malware is bouncing around the Android platform, but it can be found all over the Internet. Embarrassment aside, it can be fixed, but it will take time. While there’s plenty of advice out there for staying safe – like making sure you only install legitimate apps, and don’t fall for phishing attacks, to name some — you won’t be safe unless you heed it.

Any opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author.

Adam Levin is chairman and co-founder of Credit.com and Identity Theft 911. His experience as former director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs gives him unique insight into consumer privacy, legislation and financial advocacy. He is a nationally recognized expert on identity theft and credit.

norcalblueeyes writerchickmarie jerseyboysnetwork jlyjerseygirls johnllloydyoung

[celebritysanity]

the first post

it breaks my heart to see talented young women wasting time on people who will never know they exist.

Babe, if you spent the time you sepnd on Frank Famousface to work on your own life, you’d be unstoppable. 

Welcome to my little corner of the internet. Here we wear red, blast Swedish synth music, and sip non-alcoholic drinks as we plan out our massive success like supervillians.

Here’s to giving ourselves more energy and love than we give strangers over social media. 

love, 

Syl

[our-reading-is-dreaming]

Recent Celeb Obsession: Connor Franta! 😍 he is the perfect amount of crazy and adorable and cool!! I have been watching his YouTube vids since forever but for some reason I am like in love with him.

[bidigonzalez]

Happy Birthday Freddie Prinze Jr. He only gets hotter with age! 😍 #freddieprinzejr #happybirthday #celebrityobsession #celebritycrush #hubs #forevermylove

[regardingberlin]

The Bling Ring

In the preserved glory of Kino International on Karl Marx Allee, we watched Sofia Coppola’s The Bling Ring. It’s a frightening coke-fuelled L.A. confection that explores the blurry lines of celebrity brands, ownership, and the corrosion of the american dream.

The most successful scenes for me are the ones focused on a family who follows a cult-like, Positive-Thinking religion based on The Secret. Mom speaks corporate-guru style. And she closes prayers with cheers: “You rock” and “You go girls”. She comments only that her daughter’s new dress is “Cute” after months of the home-schooled girls wearing haute couture stolen from celebrities—Paris, Lindsay, Audrina.

The film follows a group of L.A. teens as they break into celebrity homes filled with fetishized jewelry, handbags, clothes—we are voyeurs with the teen thieves, trying to have or to glimpse “What everybody kind of wants,” as one character puts it. Coppola takes us into fanciful bedrooms and closets—we watch them sift through boxes of jewelry, tear through piles of Paris's or Lindsay’s lingerie and dresses. And the screen cuts to the teens’ Facebook pages and “selfies” where they proudly display their spoils.

A friend who was there said only, “Well, it made me want to do drugs.”

In the New Yorker, Richard Brody describes the film’s dark core: “Nothing is more corrosive to democratic morale than the disconnect of wealth from honest effort, and there’s no more deeply ingrained democratic principle than that of the equal intrinsic value of all people.”

Visually and aesthetically pitch-perfect, and I’m still thinking about it. But I felt a bit sick at the end, like I’d eaten cakes and candies for days. Read nothing but celebrity blogs.

[mixedinthismadness]

Url: not my thing | cool | fab | flawless | asdfghjkl

Icon: not my thing | cool | fab | flawless | asdfghjkl

Theme: not my thing | cool | fab | flawless | asdfghjkl

Posts: not my thing | cool | fab | flawless | asdfghjkl

Overall: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |10+ 

Following: no, sorry | I am now | yes | forever

have a good day xx

blog rates just massage me a (/._.)/

[pnukedits]

request :)

[jlt-movies]

Obsession with Fame #1. 

Found this amazing picture of Emma Watson in her new movie "Bling Ring", directed by the lovely Sofia Coppola. This picture is the perfect depiction of some of Hollywood's obsession with celebrity and the media.

If you haven't already read the summary of the movie, here it is: (oh sorry that I didn't post this summary in my latest Bling Ring post...oops!) 

Based on true events, the group, who were fixated on the glamorous life, tracked their celebrity targets online, and stole more than 3 million in luxury from their homes. Their celebrity victims include Paris Hilton, Orlando Bloom, and Rachel Bilson.

Cheers!

[bidigonzalez]

Hot date with this guy!!!!! OMG how I love this face. #freddieprinzejr #celebrityobsession #husband #heloves #ilovehim #ShesAllThat #favoritemovie