#Bureau of Indian Standards
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
#Bureau of Indian Standards#electricvehicles#electricvehiclesnews#evnews#evtimes#autoevtimes#evbusiness
0 notes
Text
The IS 269:2015, which is a standard set by the Bureau of Indian Standards, establishes guidelines for the design and construction of steel scaffolding. This standard outlines specifications for materials, dimensions, and load-bearing capacities, ensuring safety and efficiency in construction projects across India. It incorporates best practices to enhance structural integrity and stability, reflecting advancements in engineering and safety protocols. Compliance with IS 269:2015 is crucial for ensuring the reliability and durability of steel scaffolding systems, thus promoting a safer working environment and higher quality construction projects nationwide.
#ISO 9001#ISO 22000:2018#ISO 14001: 2015#ISO 45001: 2018#ISO 13485:2016#ISO 16603#ISO – ISO 37001#ISO 27001:2013#ISO-20000#ISO-16240#ISO-1475#IS0-302#ISO-31000#GMP#ROHS#CE MARK#HACCP#BIS certification#trade regulations#BIS import#BIS compliance#BIS certificate#Bureau of Indian Standards#Indian imports#import process#import certification#import compliance#import procedures#import laws#BIS India
0 notes
Text
#b2b services#consulting#legal services#business#bis certification#bis system certification#bureau of indian standards
0 notes
Text
Get in touch with us and apply for the BIS registration in India. BIS is mandatory for many kind of products. If you are a manufacturer and have queries related to the BIS then connect with us and we will help you in filing BIS Registration Certificate in India.
#bis certification#bis registration#bis license#bureau of indian standards#certificate#haircare products#beauty products#consumer goods#skincare products#businesses#online store
1 note
·
View note
Text
Why Acquiring a BIS Registration Necessary for Solar Photovoltaics, Systems, Devices and Components?
Solar photovoltaics (PV) have emerged as a crucial solution in the transition towards sustainable energy. These systems, devices, and components harness sunlight to generate electricity, providing a renewable and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional energy sources. However, ensuring the quality, safety, and compliance of solar PV products is essential to maximize their benefits…
View On WordPress
#bis for solar photovoltaics#bis for storage battery#bis india#bis registration#bis registration process#bureau of indian standards
1 note
·
View note
Text
For those who are looking for a Medical Device Registration consultancy in Delhi ELT Corporate is there for you. You can connect with the team Of ELT Corporate Medical Device License and apply for it now. They will assist you and figure out all the required information for you. You only have to connect with the team on +91 9891-998-002.
For all manufacturers, Importers, & wholesalers of medical devices connect with us now for medical device registration In India.
#medical device#medical device registration#medical device loan license#manufacturer#importers#dealer#wholesale#elt corporate#bis certification#bis registration#bis license#iso certification#iso 9001#iso standard#bureau of indian standards#legal metrology
0 notes
Text
#bis certification#how to get bis certification in india#certification#isi certification#bis registration process in india#bureau of indian standards#india certification#bis certification process#wpc certification#bis certificate in india#bis certification for digital camera in india#crs certification#fmcs certification#fssai certification#how to get bis certification#bis certification for electronic products in india#battery certification in india#wpc eta approval#bis license in india#bis certificate registration#bis registration in india#eta approval#bis certification consultants#wpc approval#bis registration
0 notes
Text
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) is India's national standards organisation in charge of producing and promoting standards in a variety of areas. It reports to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution and is responsible for maintaining the quality, safety, and dependability of the country's products and services. By creating standards and conformity evaluation procedures, BIS hopes to protect consumers' interests, facilitate trade, and promote overall economic development.
#BIS Registration in India#get BIS Registration in India#Online BIS Registration#Bureau of Indian Standards
1 note
·
View note
Text
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G, Galaxy F14 5G Get BIS Certification, May Launch in India Soon: Report
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G, Galaxy F14 5G Get BIS Certification, May Launch in India Soon: Report
Samsung Galaxy M14 5G is believed to be in the works. It had recently surfaced on the Geekbench database, purportedly revealing some of its key specifications. The handset has now reportedly been spotted on the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification site, which might imply that this Samsung smartphone may soon launch in India. Furthermore, another Samsung handset with the model number…
View On WordPress
#bis#bureau of indian standards#samsung#samsung galaxy f14 5g#samsung m14 f14 5g bis certification india launch galaxy speciifications samsung galaxy m14 5g
0 notes
Text
BIS Recruitment 2024: Apply for 03 Young Professional Positions
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) We're seeking dynamic Young Professionals for 03 positions across Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, or Pan India. Eligible candidates with Graduation or MBA qualifications can apply. Enjoy a fixed pay scale of Rs. 70,000/- for two years. Applications open from 26-04-2024 to 25-05-2024. No payment required for application. Apply now and kick-start your career with BIS!
0 notes
Text
[Before anyone says anything, yes I have a life. I just happen to be an autistic person in STEM so I love stats and any excuse to do an analysis I'm there.]
So let's see how "affordable" $5.99 is a month in the US and then around the world...
[Post comparing Watcher Entertainment's 5.99 US Dollar monthly subscription to different world currencies and what they mean in terms of food (example used is a standard loaf of bread).]
All conversions are correct as of:
US Dollar
According to the United States Department of Labor website in March 2024 a loaf of bread is, on average, $2.00. So that's three loaves of bread for one month's subscription.
Pound Sterling
(My home currency)
According to the Office of National Statistics in March 2024 a loaf of bread is, on average, £1.39 a loaf. So that is three and a half loaves per monthly Watcher subscription price.
Australian Dollars
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2023 a loaf of bread, on average, was $4.04. So that is two loaves of bread per monthly subscription.
Canadian Dollars
According to this living costs and moving website in March 2024 a loaf of bread, on average, cost $3.02. So that is just over two and a half loaves per monthly subscription.
Indian Rupees
According to The Times of India in September 2023 a loaf of bread, on average, costs Rs 38. That is THIRTEEN loaves of bread per monthly subscription. THIRTEEN!
Euros
So as Euros are used in various European countries I've picked the country with the highest GDP (Germany) and the country with the lowest GDP (Malta), that both use Euros.
In Germany, a loaf of bread costs €1.91 in 2024 according to this cost of living website. That is three loaves of bread per monthly subscription.
In Malta, a loaf of bread costs €0.94 according to this cost of living website. That is SIX loaves of bread per monthly subscription.
I'm not going to make any conclusions. You can all make your own 😅
#watcher#literally was bored and the autism kicked in#i love googling shit like this#watcher entertainment
102 notes
·
View notes
Text
ISO Certification and BIS Registration by Analytical Quality Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
In today's global landscape, environmental sustainability has become a critical focal point for organizations across industries. With increasing awareness of climate change and environmental degradation, businesses are under growing pressure to operate in an environmentally responsible manner. ISO 14001 certification stands as a testament to an organization's commitment to environmental management, providing a structured framework for the establishment, implementation, and continuous improvement of an environmental management system (EMS). This article aims to explore the significance of ISO 14001 certification, its key components, and the steps involved in obtaining and maintaining this esteemed accreditation.
Understanding ISO 14001
ISO 14001 is an internationally recognized standard developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It sets out the criteria for an effective EMS, enabling organizations to identify, prioritize, and manage environmental risks and opportunities systematically. The standard follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, emphasizing continual improvement and ensuring that environmental objectives align with the organization's overall goals.
Conclusion
ISO 14001 certification is a strategic tool for organizations committed to environmental sustainability and responsible business practices. By implementing an effective EMS aligned with ISO 14001 requirements, organizations can enhance environmental performance, achieve regulatory compliance, and gain a competitive advantage in the global market. As the world continues to prioritize sustainability, ISO 14001 certification serves as a beacon of excellence, guiding organizations toward a more sustainable future.Top of Form
#ISO 9001#ISO 22000:2018#ISO 14001: 2015#ISO 45001: 2018#ISO 13485:2016#ISO 16603#ISO – ISO 37001#ISO 27001:2013#ISO-20000#ISO-16240#ISO-1475#IS0-302#ISO-31000#GMP#ROHS#CE MARK#HACCP#BIS certification#trade regulations#BIS import#BIS compliance#BIS certificate#Bureau of Indian Standards#Indian imports#import process#import certification#import compliance#import procedures#import laws#BIS India
1 note
·
View note
Text
🎓✨ Unlock the Future of Tech with Dr. Surabhi Pandey!
We were honored to have Dr. Surabhi Pandey, a leading expert in Cloud Computing, Cyber Security, Data Analytics, and Digital Marketing, share her vast knowledge at our B Tech Orientation. With 18+ years of experience, she emphasized the power of digital leadership and staying ahead of the curve in an ever-evolving tech landscape. 🌐🚀
Dr. Pandey's work has been recognized by top institutions, including the Indian Army and the 3E Innovative Foundation, and she continues to set new benchmarks as a key member of the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Her insights inspire us to drive innovation and adapt to the digital age!
👉 Watch the reel to gain valuable takeaways on the future of technology, leadership, and embracing change.
52 notes
·
View notes
Text
Project 2025 will kill you. Yes, you. Sections 11-15 (of 30)
So I've been reading Project 2025 so you don't have to, and I'm going to report on everything I find that is alarming, which is a lot. Part One can be found here. Part Two can be found here.
Section 11 - Department of Education
"Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Department of Education should be eliminated."
That's the first sentence in this whole section. I think that pretty much says it all.
All student loans and grants are to be moved to the private sector. Move education for military families to the Defense Department and for Washington D.C. to Congress. I imagine that also applies to protectorates like Guam and Puerto Rico but the document actually doesn't say.
Put all education funding under State Control. You should really ask a child living in Florida how that's working out. Reject Gender Identity and Racial studies. Eliminate executive orders in education. I remind you that integration was done by executive order.
Transfer all Native American education to the Bureau for Indian Affairs. Transfer all adult education programs to the Department of Labor. Privatize Student Aid.
Move all civil rights enforcement to the Department of Justice. Transfer all civil service employees to other agencies. Eliminate the understanding that Trans people even exist.
Eliminate any privacy regulations used to protect students from any form of abuse. Rescind all regulations in Equity in IDEA.
Eliminate all food programs for students. All of them.
Phase out income-based student loan repayment programs. Rescind all funding for the National Education Association. Consider "Critical Race Theory" to be racism.
Here's a crazy one that takes paragraphs to unravel: Allow parents of children over the age of 18 to sue to recover any monies spent on their education. Also, allow families to "opt out" of the education system entirely and for those that do give as a tax break the funding that would have been used to educate that child directly to the parents.
Allow states to opt out of any and all federal education programs. Eliminate Parent PLUS loans.
There is page after page of basically "end anything Obama or Biden did", but eventually it all boils down to that first sentence. Eliminate the Department of Education.
Section 12 - Department of Energy (and related commissions)
You would expect this whole document to be drill baby drill but in fact it starts with the repeal and elimination of the Biden Administration's Infrastructure Act - the single largest jobs creation bill in the last 75 years. That's followed with not only a dependence upon oil and natural gas but a declaration that the U.S. needs to be the best in the world in Science. Great for a country trying to eliminate the Department of Education.
Eliminate the office of Clean Energy, and the office of Grid Deployment. Yep, they don't want the government looking at the power grid.
Not only increase a reliance ("dominance") in oil and gas but nuclear power as well.
Lots of paragraphs on focusing on science, which again - see the section on the Department of Education. Lots of contradictions here. Increase the level of private sector disposal of nuclear waste. What could possibly go wrong?
Fund a rebuilding of the country's nuclear arsenal. New warheads and testing. Eliminate Carbon Capture programs and Carbon offsets. Pursue much more coal, including coal waste as fuel. Increase fossil fuels.
End the government's focus on green energy and renewables. Eliminate efficiency standards for appliances. In fact, they put this paragraph in the document twice on consecutive pages.
"End Grid planning and focus instead on reliability." I shit you not, that's a whole topic in here. Say goodbye to grid upgrades and hello to more Texas-style outages. They then spend several pages repeating everything I've already told you about.
Eliminate the Department of Energy's ability to make loans. Eliminate the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Looks like that better battery for your Tesla is going to have to wait.
Eliminate the Clean Energy Corps. Privatize the Energy Information Administration. Stop all funding for "climate reparations" - i.e. paying for the damage caused by oil production in underdeveloped nations.
Drill in Alaska (of course). Claim the Arctic Circle for the same purpose. Take an "America First" approach at the Office of Technology.
Accelerate cleanup of all "Superfund" sites (except for Hanford in Washington State - which is where the U.S. government has stored Plutonium Waste for many years) with a goal of completing all work by 2035. That sounds good on the surface but in most of these sites there is a reason that it needs to go slow: fast work actually makes the contamination WORSE and spreads it further. Eliminate some regulations specific to the Hanford site.
Get all active Nuclear Waste stored at Yucca Mountain already.
As long as we're talking about nuclear stuff again, let's make more nukes. Abandon the Test Ban Treaty. Divest certain programs at Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore to refocus on nuclear energy and weaponry. Several pages are spent rehashing the need to get rid of renewables
Refocus transmission of electrical to the state level. I mean, why can't we all be Texas? Eliminate all questions about oil and gas pipelines to only consider the need for the fuels, not environmental or any other concerns.
Eliminate the guidance of "as low as reasonably possible" for nuclear exposure when considering renewing the licensing for existing nuclear power plants or building new ones.
Fuck, this was a nightmare to get through. but guess what's next?
Section 13 - Environmental Protection Agency
This whole section was written by Mandy M. Gunasekara, a former Chief of Staff at the EPA under the Trump Administration who in 2023 was kicked off the ballot in Mississippi when she ran for Public Service Commissioner - because she didn't live there.
Let's start that in the mission statement that it blames the lead poisoning crisis in Flint Michigan on The Obama Administration, which is so obviously incorrect that it boggle belief. It also states that every expansion of the EPA since 1972 is unnecessary.
Eliminate the Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights. Eliminate the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance. Eliminate the Office of Public Engagement and Environmental Education. "Relocate" the Office of Children’s Health Protection and the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization - although the document does say where to relocate these agencies to.
Review the grants program to ensure that taxpayer funds go to organizations focused on tangible environmental improvements free from political affiliation (there are no such groups).
This document goes on for more than 30 pages and makes the same faulty assumptions and rewrites historical data so often that it should be considered a work of fiction. But the key thing is unchanged: That everything that the EPA has done in terms of rulings and regulations since 1972 should be repealed.
Where I grew up you could see the air in 1972. It was grey. That's what they want to go back to.
Section 14 - Department of Heath and Human Services
This whole section was written by The Heritage Foundation. In the first two sentences it proclaims the COVID-19 Pandemic as over (which it isn't) and that life expectancy has decreased since the end of the Pandemic - which we do not yet know as the timing is too recent for statistical analysis. It's a lie.
No more abortions. Ever.
Prioritize families over everyone else. By the way, that's "traditional" families. Mother, father, children, church.
Remove the ability to declare emergencies and provide guidelines for outbreaks of diseases that contradict the political agenda of the administration. Move the recommendations of the CDC on how to treat anything into a separate political agency. The entire document assumes that the CDC is faulty and corrupt, and not that the people using the CDC to make policy are. This is also a lie.
Remove Generic drugs from Medicaid. Make Abortion pills a controlled substance, with the ultimate goal of making them illegal at the same degree as Meth and Cocaine.
Eliminate chickenpox, Hepatitis, and MMR vaccines that originate from studies and science from fetal tissue. That's all of them, by the way. Also, eliminate vaccine mandates of any kind - you know, the type that for a while eliminated chicken pox, small pox, the mumps, measles and so on and could have been used to eliminate COVID. I notice that all of these are on the rise in the US. Even motherfucking POLIO is back.
Eliminate all research that uses science from Fetal Tissue. Eliminate all science funding and research that involves the fluidity of human sexuality. There are men and there are women and they are born that way. Period.
Several paragraphs are about "Woke" policies, and they encourage an end to diversity in conferences and studies.
When it gets to the Medicare section there is paragraph after paragraph about the bureaucracy of Medicare and how much time doctors have to spend on paperwork. This is a common fallacy that has been around for decades - yes, there is paperwork and there is a lot of it, but it's still LESS PAPERWORK THAN REQUIRED BY PRIVATE INSURERS.
The truth is that bureaucratic waste in Medicaid is about 2%, where in the private industry it varies from 5% to 10%.
Eliminate the ability to negotiate drug prices under Medicare.
As for Medicaid, paragraph after paragraph is dedicated to the elimination of problems that don't actually exist, plus adding work requirements to eligibility and actually taking away from states the ability to make programs flexible - which seems like an oxymoron until you realize that most waivers for various programs under Medicaid are for Democratic Party controlled states that are allowed to use these funds to treat the LGBTAI+ community and allow for abortion access.
Under the Affordable Care Act there is an awful lot of focus on redesigning medical care into a Concierge Medicine approach, which most people would not be able to afford. The document calls this stronger health care (true) and more affordable (patently false). It would also eliminate all of the cost controls in the system. There is no language saying that they want to eliminate the ACA, but they certainly would render it useless.
Prohibit travel for Abortion care.
Defund Planned Parenthood, which as I like to tell people is NOT a chain of abortion clinics but is a chain of Doctor's Offices with an emphasis on women's care. Withdraw Medicaid funds from any state where abortion is legal.
Deny gender affirming care for anyone with Medicaid or Medicare. Again, men and women are the only two genders and they are determined at birth.
Rescind all COVID-19 Mask and Vaccination guidelines, and pay damages to anyone displaced (i.e. fired) for not following those guidelines.
Institute work requirements for all recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Most of the verbiage about the prevention of teenage pregnancies is to deter things that aren't happening. Adoptions should be funneled through religious organizations. Crazily enough, the document in the same paragraph also acknowledges that there are 4 times more children awaiting adoption than people who want them, although I believe the actual ratio is closer to 7 to 1.
Move the office of Refugee Settlement to the Department of Homeland Security. Looking back at that document, there is no indication that DHS actually wants this.
Allows for parents who do not have custody of their children to receive a child-tax credit anyway. It actually specifically calls out that it wants the ability to allow deadbeat dads to take the tax credit.
Encourage bad marriages to stay together as a requirement of government assistance. Allow faith-based organizations who distribute this aid to discriminate as they see fit. Implement a national campaign that is pro-father propaganda. You know, to keep marriages together. Think of the poor men.
Eliminate Head Start.
Criminalized Physician assisted suicide, which is legal in 10 states according to this document. Remove requirements that telemedicine be local to the patient. I should point out that this would eliminate the ability to recommend hospitalizations, as these doctors wouldn't have admitting privileges where the patients actually are.
Allow hospitals, doctors and physicians to not provide abortion related care of any kind because of religious beliefs, even in states where it is legal and protected.
No more funding for condoms. No more funding for "Morning-after" pills (which they call "the week after pills" in this section). Withdraw all support for gender affirming/transitioning guidance.
Stop teaching the medical procedures used in abortion care. I repeat, hinder the educational skills of every doctor in America.
The entire section on Indian Health Care (and why can't they ever use the phrase "Native Americans"?) is full of lies and I won't dignify them.
Sunset all HHS regulations, which Trump tried last time around.
More bullshit about violations of human rights that never happened (mostly involving twitter and Facebook). They don't want the department to push back against lies on social media.
More verbiage that the administration needs to be Pro-Life and anti-Trans care. This is like the fifth or sixth time in this document so far, making it one of the longer ones I've gone through. This is followed by a series of paragraphs that are mostly lies about the COVID Pandemic, complaining about things that never happened.
It's full of lies.
Restrict and/or rescind funding to any country that supports abortion care. Prohibit overseas personnel from providing care that is in contradiction with administration policy. That's right, overseas care is now a political decision.
The entire rest of the document - several pages - is about how the only civil rights violation in health care is that providers of care of certain religions are not allowed to discriminate in their health care decisions, and that such discrimination should be allowed.
To summarize: No abortions, no gender affirming care, no contraceptives, stay in abusive marriages, no good health care for poor people, let churches discriminate, and lie every third sentence (or more often).
Section 15 - Department Housing and Urban Development
Woohoo! This section was written by Dr. Ben Carson! This of course means it's the shortest section in the whole damn thing, clocking in at all of 14 pages, 4 of which are footnotes.
Also, unlike previous chapters, the first 4 pages are only about what the department does who what the department posts and responsibilities are, and has no policy directives save for the basic concept that the department needs an overhaul.
Replace all career officers with political appointees. Issue an executive order making the HUD Secretary a member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S, to counter the Chinese threat that they are buying to much real estate in the U.S. Seems highly reminiscent of the same language used against Japan in the 1980's.
Reverse all protections for LGBTQIA+ persons implemented under the Biden Administration. Reverse all property appraisals done under the Biden Administration, because you know they did them all wrong. Eliminate any programs that have any mention of Climate Change. Eliminate the use of special-purpose credit authorities. Eliminate the new Housing Supply Fund.
Non-citizens, even those households who are comprised of both citizens and non-citizens, are to be denied housing assistance. Anyone with mental issues or drug assistance issues need to be treated before considered for housing.
"Statutorily restricting eligibility for first-time homebuyers." That's the EXACT wording.
Finally, create an office of CFO for the department, who will do most of the work. Not bad for the laziest cabinet secretary in all history.
14 pages, only 6 of which are policy, all of which is designed to not actually do anything.
Next posting will cover the Department of the Interior, the Department of Justice, Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, and the Department of Veteran Affairs.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
#bis license#bis registration#bis crs registration#bis for induction stove#bureau of indian standards#induction stove#bis registration india
1 note
·
View note
Text
Twenty-seven years since the last revision in 1997, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has altered its Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 (SPD 15)—providing a much-needed update in the standards for defining race and ethnic categories for use in data collection across all government agencies.
The revised standards are not perfect, and OMB promises to continue monitoring their use. But they are a marked improvement in light of ongoing shifts in U.S. racial and ethnic demographics, because they will allow more flexibility for individuals in identifying how they see themselves.
The new changes will affect the “minimal categories” for data collection—the race and ethnicity data that every federal survey will be required to ask about. In addition to the five “race” categories that have been used for decades (reflecting persons identifying as White, Black or African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or American Indian or Alaska Native), the new minimal categories will also include “Hispanic or Latino” and “Middle Eastern or North African” (or MENA). These two new categories are not traditional racial categories; therefore, this classification will be noted as one of “race and/or ethnicity.”
The addition of the Hispanic or Latino category results from the elimination of the separate “Hispanic/Non Hispanic” question which was previously asked in addition the race question. Research from the Census Bureau and others showed that when posed with separate ethnicity and race questions, a large share of Hispanic or Latino respondents did not identify with traditional racial categories and that a “combined” race/ethnic question yielded far more valid results. In this new classification, Hispanic or Latino respondents, like those of other groups, can choose to identify with other racial categories as well, but will not be required to.
The addition of the MENA category for people of Middle Eastern and North African descent stems from years of lobbying from MENA-related communities. Prior to the new standards, MENA was often offered as subcategory of “White.”
Perhaps most importantly, the new standards dictate that as a default, government agencies will collect data on detailed race and ethnic groups within each of the seven minimal race and ethnic categories. And where possible, agencies will provide “check boxes” for the five largest detailed groups (based on the 2020 census) as well as an open-ended “write in” box to capture other groups. (One exception is for the American Indian or Alaska Native category, for which only a write-in option is required.) Moreover, the instructions on questionnaires that allow both minimal and detailed categories encourage respondents to select “all that apply,” thus facilitating the collection of multiracial and multiethnic categories.
Clearly, the expansion of the data that government agencies collect will provide far greater opportunities to examine racial and ethnic disparities on measures of economic well-being, health, education, and more from variety of sources. With that said, OMB is aware of the challenges involved with their implementation—it provides guidelines for their presentation and promises to maintain a standing Interagency Committee to carry out continuing research and review of SPD 15. Now, it is up to policymakers, scholars, and practitioners to communicate their experiences with the new standards to the wider network of stakeholders and agencies in order to take advantage of this long overdue effort to improve the nation’s diversity data.
In this Around the Halls piece, scholars from across Brookings give their early thoughts on these changes and their potential impacts.
5 notes
·
View notes