#BirthrightCitizenship

[rwnnews]

Trump’s Bid to End Birthright Citizenship Hits Another Wall.

Trump’s Bid to End Birthright Citizenship Hits Another Wall. On February 19, 2025, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco delivered a significant blow to President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda. The court rejected an emergency request from the Justice Department to partially reinstate Trump’s executive order, signed on his first day back in office on January 20, 2025. This…

[niham21]

US Birthright Citizenship Latest Update: Birthright Citizenship Abolished in the US, When Will the Order Take Effect?

🚨 Birthright Citizenship Canceled! 🚨👉 No More Automatic US Citizenship for Babies!💡 How Will This Impact Indian Immigrants?

Read Now! 👇

[imagilityco]

Trump’s First-Day Immigration Orders: Key Changes Explained

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump assumed office and immediately signed a series of executive orders aimed at transforming U.S. immigration policies. These actions mark a return to several policies from his first term, coupled with new measures focused on strengthening border security, restricting asylum, and revising naturalization rules. Below is an overview of these impactful changes.

Reversal of Previous Immigration Policies

One of the significant orders rescinds several immigration measures introduced during President Biden’s administration. Key highlights include:

Termination of the policy limiting deportation to serious criminals.

Cancellation of agreements with Central American countries designed to control migration.

Dissolution of the family reunification task force.

Reduction of refugee admissions and rollback of efforts to ease legal immigration.

Birthright Citizenship Reforms

A pivotal executive order challenges the principle of birthright citizenship. Key provisions include:

Applicability to children born on or after February 20, 2025.

Citizenship eligibility requiring at least one parent to be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident.

Legal challenges expected regarding constitutional validity.

Stricter Immigration Enforcement

The administration introduced tougher immigration enforcement measures, including:

Accelerated deportation processes for undocumented immigrants.

Expanded detention facilities for those awaiting court hearings.

Mandatory registration for undocumented immigrants, with penalties for non-compliance.

Reintegration of local police in immigration enforcement and revival of a program to track crimes by undocumented immigrants.

Enhanced Border Security and Asylum Restrictions

Key measures include:

Requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed.

Termination of special entry programs for individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.

Ending the release of migrants while awaiting court dates.

Critics argue these changes could lead to increased illegal crossings due to limited legal entry options.

Southern Border National Emergency Declaration

President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, citing an “invasion.” Measures include:

Deployment of military forces for immigration enforcement.

Directing the Department of Defense to fund and construct additional border walls.

Expanded use of drones and surveillance technology.

Legal challenges are anticipated due to concerns about military involvement in immigration enforcement.

Limitations on Humanitarian Relief

This executive order restricts humanitarian relief options:

Review of Temporary Protected Status (TPS), potentially ending protections for many.

Stricter criteria for humanitarian entry.

Limited access to social services for immigrants.

Expanding Military Authority at the Border

The military has been granted expanded responsibilities, including:

Assisting in the detention and deportation of immigrants.

Possible use of military courts for certain immigration cases.

Legal experts warn this could conflict with laws restricting domestic military involvement.

Revisions to Refugee Admissions

The refugee admissions program faces significant changes:

Lowering the refugee cap.

Stricter qualification criteria.

Closure of programs for climate refugees.

Requirement for refugees to seek asylum in another country first.

Cutting Federal Funding for Sanctuary Cities

Key provisions include:

Halting government grants to sanctuary cities.

Mandating information sharing between local agencies and federal officials.

Strengthening collaboration between local police and ICE.

Legal opposition is expected, as previous attempts to cut funding faced legal roadblocks.

Conclusion

President Trump’s executive orders signal sweeping changes to U.S. immigration policy, focusing on tighter border controls, tougher enforcement, and reduced legal immigration pathways. As these changes unfold and face potential legal challenges, their long-term impact will shape the nation’s immigration landscape.

For More Information To gain deeper insights and stay informed about these crucial changes, visit the original blog for detailed updates and expert analysis. Click here to read more.

[executive-orders]

Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship (EO 14160)

Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2025-02007

Insights on Executive Order 14160:

Purpose and Policy:

Purpose: This executive order aims to redefine the criteria for automatic birthright citizenship in the United States. It seeks to clarify the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by specifying conditions under which a person born in the U.S. would not automatically be considered a U.S. citizen at birth.

Policy: The order establishes that children born to mothers who are either unlawfully present or temporarily legally present in the U.S., without a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident father, will not be automatically granted U.S. citizenship. This policy takes effect 30 days after the issuance of the order.

Legal and Constitutional Considerations:

Constitutional Interpretation: The order invokes historical context, particularly critiquing the Dred Scott decision, while interpreting the Fourteenth Amendment to exclude certain groups from automatic citizenship. This interpretation might be contentious, as it narrows the previously broad understanding of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

Legislation vs. Executive Order: The order references existing law (8 U.S.C. 1401) but attempts to modify its application through executive action, which could lead to legal challenges regarding the extent of presidential authority to alter citizenship laws without Congressional action.

Implementation and Enforcement:

Departmental Actions: Agencies like the Department of State, Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and Social Security Administration are tasked with aligning their practices with this new policy. This includes updating regulatory guidance, which must be done within 30 days.

Public Guidance: The requirement for public guidance suggests an intent to maintain transparency and inform the public of changes in citizenship policy, though the specifics of how these policies will be enforced day-to-day remain subject to further clarification.

Potential Impact:

Immediate Effects: Children born to parents under the specified conditions post-order will not automatically receive U.S. citizenship, potentially affecting immigration, education, and welfare policies.

Long-term Implications: This could lead to an increase in statelessness if other countries also do not recognize the citizenship of these children. It might also encourage more stringent immigration checks for pregnant women.

Legal Challenges: Given the controversial nature of altering citizenship laws through executive order, there might be significant legal pushback, possibly leading to court cases challenging the order's constitutionality.

Political and Social Considerations:

Public Reaction: This order might polarize public opinion, with debates centering on issues of immigration, national identity, and rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.

International Relations: How other nations react to this policy could affect diplomatic relations, especially regarding visa policies and international agreements on citizenship.

Overall, this executive order represents a significant shift in U.S. citizenship policy, potentially altering the landscape of immigration law, constitutional interpretation, and the rights of individuals born in the U.S. under specific circumstances. The execution and long-term effects of this order would depend heavily on legal interpretations and political will.

Analysis in Relation to U.S. Law

Constitutional Basis and Historical Context:

Fourteenth Amendment: The order references the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees citizenship to all persons "born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." Historically, interpretations have generally included a broad birthright citizenship, but with notable exceptions like children of diplomats or Native Americans (prior to certain legislative acts).

Dred Scott v. Sandford: The order mentions this case to highlight the historical exclusion of certain groups from citizenship based on race, which was later rectified by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Legal Interpretation and Implications:

Jurisdiction Clause: The order's interpretation of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" seems to narrow the scope beyond what current legal interpretations under the Fourteenth Amendment typically uphold. Traditionally, this clause has been interpreted to exclude only those with no allegiance to the U.S., like foreign diplomats' children. The order extends this to include children born to mothers who are unlawfully present or temporarily in the U.S., which is a significant departure from established judicial interpretations.

Legal Challenge: This reinterpretation could face significant legal challenges. The Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) affirmed that children born to legal and illegal immigrants in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment. This order might be seen as conflicting with that precedent unless a new legal or constitutional interpretation is upheld by the courts.

Legislation and Administrative Actions:

8 U.S.C. 1401: The order aligns with this statute in recognizing citizenship but adds conditions not specified in the statute, potentially overstepping executive authority without corresponding legislative action.

Policy Implementation: The order mandates policy changes across various government departments. However, its enforcement might be legally contested as an overreach of executive power if not supported by new legislation or a judicial reinterpretation of the Constitution.

Potential for Litigation:

Equal Protection Clause: This order could be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause, arguing that it discriminates against children based on their parents' legal status or visa conditions at the time of birth.

Due Process: There might be due process concerns regarding the retroactive nature of denying citizenship to those born after the 30-day implementation period without legislative support.

Political and Social Implications:

Public Reaction and Policy Debate: This order could reignite debates over immigration, citizenship, and legal rights, potentially polarizing public opinion further.

Impact on Immigration Policy: It might influence future immigration policy discussions, particularly around birthright citizenship, visa policies, and the rights of immigrants.

Conclusion:

Constitutional and Legal Viability: The executive order's approach to redefine the scope of birthright citizenship directly challenges established legal norms. Its enforceability would hinge on judicial review, potentially at the Supreme Court level.

Immediate Actions: Agencies will need to revise policies, but any immediate action might be stayed by court orders if lawsuits are filed contesting the order's legality.

Overall Impact: The order represents a significant shift in policy, likely to provoke legal battles, public discourse, and potentially legislative responses. Its ultimate fate would be determined by how courts interpret the Constitution in light of this new directive.

Explanation of the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"

The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is a legal term originating from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, specifically from Section 1, which states:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Here's a breakdown of its meaning:

Jurisdiction:

In legal terms, jurisdiction refers to the authority granted to a legal body (like a court or government) to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility.

Subject to the jurisdiction thereof:

This clause means that the individual must be fully and completely under the laws of the United States. The key interpretations include:

Exclusion of Diplomats and Foreign Troops: For instance, children born to foreign diplomats or members of foreign military units stationed in the U.S. are not considered "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. because their parents have diplomatic immunity or are subject to the laws of their own country under international agreements. This means they (and by extension, their children) are not fully subject to U.S. legal authority.

Historical Context and Native Americans: At the time the amendment was passed, Native American tribes were considered separate nations under federal law, not fully under U.S. jurisdiction. This interpretation began to change with subsequent laws and court decisions, notably with the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, which granted citizenship to Native Americans born within the territorial limits of the United States.

Debates on Birthright Citizenship:

This phrase has been central to debates over "birthright citizenship" — the right to citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil. Some argue that "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" should mean not just being physically present but also owing allegiance solely to the U.S., potentially excluding children of undocumented immigrants. However, the predominant legal interpretation, backed by judicial decisions like United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), has been that anyone born in the U.S., regardless of their parents' status, is a citizen if they are not covered by exceptions like diplomatic immunity.

In summary, "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is meant to exclude those who are not completely under U.S. law due to their diplomatic status or historical exceptions like Native Americans before specific legal changes. It establishes criteria for who qualifies for U.S. citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, focusing on legal allegiance and jurisdiction rather than merely physical presence.

[voidami]

Protecting Native American Rights: The Threat of Exclusion and What You Can Do

In recent days, there has been a disturbing trend of attempts to undermine the citizenship and civil rights of Native Americans. During the Trump administration, the Justice Department argued that Native Americans should not be entitled to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, citing outdated and discriminatory 19th-century laws. These arguments are not just historical footnotes—they reflect a broader effort to roll back the rights of Native Americans and other marginalized groups.

What makes this moment even more alarming is the terrifying speed at which executive orders and policy changes are being introduced. On January 20, 2025, alone, a sweeping array of executive actions were announced, targeting everything from immigration and border security to energy policy, gender identity, and federal workforce protections. These changes are happening so quickly that it’s nearly impossible to keep up, let alone mount an effective response.

For Native Americans, the stakes are particularly high. Tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and access to federal programs are all under threat. The rapid pace of these changes leaves little time for communities to organize, advocate, or mount legal challenges. It’s a deliberate strategy to overwhelm opposition and push through policies that could have devastating long-term consequences.

The Threat to Native American Rights

The Trump administration’s arguments against birthright citizenship relied on a dangerous reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Specifically, the Justice Department cited a clause in the 1866 Act that excluded “Indians not taxed” from citizenship and argued that this exclusion should still apply today. They also referenced the 1884 Supreme Court case Elk v. Wilkins, which denied citizenship to Native Americans on the grounds that they owed “immediate allegiance” to their tribes and were not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.

These arguments are not only legally flawed but also morally reprehensible. Here’s why:

The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 Native Americans are U.S. citizens by law. The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 explicitly granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the U.S., rendering the Trump administration’s arguments based on 19th-century laws irrelevant.

The 14th Amendment The 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Native Americans are unequivocally subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and their citizenship is firmly established under both the 14th Amendment and subsequent laws.

Tribal Sovereignty and Dual Citizenship Native Americans are citizens of both their tribal nations and the United States. Tribal sovereignty does not negate their U.S. citizenship—it complements it. The Trump administration’s arguments dangerously conflate tribal allegiance with foreign allegiance, ignoring the unique political status of Native American tribes.

Historical Context of Exclusion Native Americans have faced centuries of systemic discrimination, forced assimilation, and broken treaties. The Trump administration’s arguments echo the same racist and exclusionary policies that sought to deny Native Americans their rights in the past.

What You Can Do

The potential exclusion or marginalization of Native Americans is unacceptable. Here are concrete steps you can take to stand up for their rights and ensure justice prevails:

1. Raise Awareness

Share Information: Use social media, blogs, and community forums to spread the word about the risks posed by these arguments. Highlight the historical and legal context of Native American citizenship.

Educate Others: Many people are unaware of the unique legal and political status of Native Americans. Share resources about tribal sovereignty, treaties, and civil rights protections.

2. Advocate for Native American Rights

Contact Elected Officials: Reach out to your representatives in Congress and demand that they protect Native American rights. Urge them to pass legislation explicitly safeguarding tribal sovereignty and civil rights.

Support Tribal Leaders: Tribal governments are on the front lines of this fight. Amplify their voices and support their efforts to advocate for their communities.

3. Partner with Advocacy Organizations

Native American Rights Fund (NARF): NARF provides legal assistance to Native Americans and works to protect tribal sovereignty and resources.

National Congress of American Indians (NCAI): NCAI advocates for federal policies that support tribal nations and their citizens.

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): The ACLU works to defend civil rights and can help challenge discriminatory policies in court.

4. Take Legal Action

Monitor Implementation: Watch for any policies or executive actions that threaten Native American rights and document their effects.

File Lawsuits: If these arguments lead to violations of civil rights or treaty obligations, affected individuals or tribes can file lawsuits to challenge their legality.

5. Support Native-Led Initiatives

Donate to Tribal Programs: Many tribes run programs to address education, healthcare, and environmental issues. Your support can help strengthen their resilience.

Buy from Native-Owned Businesses: Economic empowerment is a powerful tool for preserving cultural heritage and self-determination.

6. Engage with Federal Agencies

Department of the Interior (DOI): The DOI, particularly the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), has a trust responsibility to protect Native American rights. Demand that they uphold this responsibility.

Department of Justice (DOJ): The DOJ enforces civil rights laws. Pressure them to investigate and address any discrimination resulting from these arguments.

7. International Advocacy

United Nations: Native American tribes can bring attention to potential violations of their rights through international bodies like the United Nations, particularly under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

Why This Matters

Native Americans have endured centuries of systemic injustice, yet they continue to fight for their rights, their lands, and their cultures. The Trump administration’s arguments against birthright citizenship are a stark reminder that these rights are still under threat. By standing together, we can ensure that Native Americans are not excluded or forgotten. Their rights are our rights, and their fight is our fight.

Key Resources

Native American Rights Fund (NARF): www.narf.org

National Congress of American Indians (NCAI): www.ncai.org

American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): www.aclu.org

Indian Citizenship Act of 1924: Read the Text

Civil Rights Act of 1964: Read the Text

Targeting Native Americans is not just a violation of their rights—it’s an attack on the principles of justice and equality that define our nation. The policies enacted on January 20, 2025, represent a profound threat not only to Native Americans but to all marginalized communities. By standing together and taking action, we can resist these changes and protect the rights of all.

But this fight cannot be won in isolation. It requires international solidarity, intersectional organizing, and the building of local power structures to ensure we are stronger together than we are divided. Here’s how you can contribute to a broader movement for justice:

Call to Action

Build Intersectional Solidarity

Recognize that the struggles of Native Americans are interconnected with those of other marginalized groups, including Black, Latino, LGBTQ+, and immigrant communities.

Support movements that fight for racial justice, environmental justice, workers’ rights, and gender equality.

Join or Form Local Organizations and Unions

Organize within your community to create networks of mutual aid, advocacy, and resistance.

Join labor unions or workers’ collectives to strengthen collective bargaining power and protect workers’ rights.

Foster Dual Power Structures

Learn from historical movements like the Black Panther Party (BPP), which built community programs (e.g., free breakfast programs, health clinics) while advocating for systemic change.

Create local initiatives that meet immediate needs—such as food distribution, healthcare access, or legal aid—while challenging oppressive systems.

Stay Connected and Communicate

Build and maintain communication networks with other activists, organizers, and communities.

Use social media, community forums, and local meetings to share information, resources, and strategies.

Engage in International Solidarity

Connect with Indigenous and marginalized communities worldwide to share knowledge, resources, and support.

Advocate for global human rights and environmental protections through international organizations and campaigns.

Educate and Mobilize

Host workshops, teach-ins, and discussions to educate others about the issues facing Native Americans and other marginalized groups.

Mobilize your community to participate in protests, rallies, and direct actions.

Support Legal and Political Advocacy

Push for legislation that protects Native American rights, tribal sovereignty, and civil rights for all.

Support candidates and organizations that align with these values at the local, state, and national levels.

Explore Revolutionary Theory

Study revolutionary theories, including communism, that emphasize collective ownership, equity, and the dismantling of oppressive systems.

Understand how these principles can inform our fight for justice and help us build a society that prioritizes people over profit.

Engage in discussions about how to apply these theories in practical, community-centered ways to address the root causes of inequality and exploitation.

Learn more here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HVm0-wE6fJH0OZ3Ri-WQ5Rmit0IwpDzVX5a8lyIeEfw/edit

Final Thoughts

The fight for justice is not just about resisting harmful policies—it’s about building a world where everyone can thrive. By standing in solidarity with Native Americans and other marginalized communities, we can create a future rooted in equality, dignity, and respect. Share this article, take action, and join the fight for justice. Together, we are stronger.

[thestevenwickblog]

News

Mutli-State AGs, ACLU & Other Immigrants Rights Groups Mount Several Legal Challenges Against Executive Order Ending Birthright Citizenship

[theglobalcommonsnews]

A coalition of 22 Democratic states has filed a lawsuit against Trump’s birthright citizenship order, citing constitutional violations and fighting for citizens’ rights. https://globalcommons.onrender.com/headlines/twentytwo_democraticled_states_sue_over_trump_birthright_citizenship_order/

[hajamfxsblog]

Trump aims to end birthright citizenship, says American citizens with family here illegally may be deported

[greatprinceofabraham]

.@NatCounterPunch

"If denial of '#birthrightcitizenship' is successful what is the anchor of my own (& your & my & your children’s) #citizenship? If not inviolate for all born in America...anyone’s birthright citizenship may...evaporate by executive order"

https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/02/25/are-we-all-soon-to-be-fugitive-slaves-if-birthright-citizenship-is-killed/

[rwnnews]

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Executive Order to End Birthright Citizenship.

Federal Judge Blocks Trump’s Executive Order to End Birthright Citizenship. In a significant legal development, a federal judge has temporarily blocked President Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. The judge ruled that the order is “blatantly unconstitutional” and has placed it on hold while legal challenges proceed. This executive order sought to restrict birthright…

[npzlawyersforimmigration]

Birthright Citizenship and Business Immigration: What Employers and Visa Holders Need to Know

https://visaserve.com/birthright-citizenship-and-business-immigration-what-employers-and-visa-holders-need-to-know/

#BirthrightCitizenship #USVisaHolders #BusinessImmigration #ImmigrationLaw #H1BVisa #L1Visa #USCIS #VisaUpdates

http://www.visaserve.com

[aventurinedeep]

USA Birth Right Citizenship Bill is in US Senate.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

#BirthRightCitizenship #USSenateBill #USCitizenship #ImmigrationReform #USImmigration #BirthrightCitizenshipBill #USLawUpdate #CitizenshipDebate #SenateBill2025 #ImmigrationPolicy #USLawChanges #ImmigrationBill #USPolitics #USAImmigration #CitizenshipRights #ImmigrantRights #USPolicyUpdate #CitizenshipReform #ImmigrationNews #USAnews #SenateLegislation #USGovernment #USCitizenshipDebate #CitizenshipBill2025 #USImmigrationLaws #SenateVote #USPolitics2025 #ImmigrationLaw #BirthrightDebate #ImmigrationReform2025 #USFamilyImmigration #ImmigrantCitizenship #aventurinecareerconsultants #meenakshipassi

[propicsmedia]

Goes off on Trump and his Sidekick Musk in Emotional Response to Trump B... LIVE CHAT WITH JAMES Jan 28, 2025 Watch as James Goes off on the Bully Trump and his Sidekick Musk in Rare Voice Raised, Emotional Response to Trump Bullying the World. Also in this episode: - False Reports of ICE Raids on Places of Worship - Foreign Interference and the Canadian Inquiry Report - Violent Crimes & Death of J6 Convicts - Elon Musk Facing Potential Action By France - Trump is Nothing But  A Mentally Ill Bully and Needs Medical Help as the World Turns Their Back on America - & MORE Join James here for another replay of Live Chat With James (AKA: The Angry Canadian) discussing National and International Issues of Importance. Get your "The Angry Canadian" Merch at https://fineartamerica.com/profiles/james-cousineau which helps to support this program. #talkshow #Trump #Musk #Crime #Justice #J6Insurection #TrumpPardons #LawEnforcement #BlueLivesMatter #Insurection #ImpeachTrump #Constitution #USConstitution #Birthrightcitizenship #ICE #IceRaids #FakeNews #foreigninterference #Trumpthebully #America #PresidentTrump #ElonMusk #France #Canada #Denmark #Greenland #Europe #NATO #WEF #WHO #ForeignAffairs #Ukraine #Gurdwara #Gurdwaras #GurdwaraRaids #Germany #Politics #Geopolitics #India #RSS #RAW #Foreignagents #gunviolence #Gunrights #Boycott #Internationaltrade #Colombia #Elsalvador #Mexico #Borderpatrol #Borderagents #DHS #FBI #IRS #SecretService #Immigration #massdeportations #humanrights #news #breakingnews #Headlines #Emotional #Angry #TheAngryCanadian

[djsegwon]

Birthright Citizenship, DEI, And Deportations Is The Talk Of Town, Trump...

We're live at Newstoter.com Hello! I’d like to invite you to our Space: NewsToter.com 📃. It takes less than a minute to join and you’ll also get instant access to our community, @FundItSocially 🔥. https://funditsocially.com/share/560tocvdCuqD2WZM

Newstoter.com/customer

#CashApp $Newstoter

#PayPal https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=LGJCVL5VRPQRE

#Venmo https://account.venmo.com/u/Newstoter

[gardensandguillotines]

WHAT IN THE ACTUAL FUCK

https://www.salon.com/2025/01/23/excluding-indians-admin-questions-native-americans-birthright-citizenship-in/

#potus #politics #birthrightcitizenship #indigenous