#Awami League Accusations

[zvaigzdelasas]

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has won an overwhelming majority in Bangladesh's parliamentary election[...]

At least 18 arson attacks preceded the vote but the election day passed in relative calm.[...]

The main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party led by former premier Khaleda Zia refused to accept the election outcome[...]

Authorities blamed much of the violence on the BNP, accusing it of seeking to sabotage the election. On Saturday, detectives arrested seven men belonging to the BNP and its youth wing for their alleged involvement in the train attack. The party denied any role in the incident. On Sunday, a supporter of an Awami League candidate was stabbed to death in Munshiganj district near the capital, Dhaka, officials said.

7 Jan 24

[metamatar]

[From 15 Dec 2023]

me when im against fascism:

Its predecessor, the party (Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan), strongly opposed the independence of Bangladesh and break-up of Pakistan. In 1971, paramilitary forces associated with the party collaborated with the Pakistan Army in mass killings of Bangladeshi nationalists and pro-intellectuals.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20]

Upon the independence of Bangladesh in 1971, the new government banned Jamaat-e-Islami from political participation since the government was secular and some of its leaders went into exile in Pakistan. Following the assassination of the first president and the military coup in 1975, the ban on the Jamaat was lifted and the new party Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh was formed. Exiled leaders were allowed to return. Abbas Ali Khan was the acting Amir of Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh. The Jamaat agenda is the creation of an "Islamic state" with the Sha'ria legal system, and outlawing "un-Islamic" practices and laws. For this reason, it interpretes their central political concept "Iqamat-e-Deen" as establishing Islamic state by possession of state power

Upon the independence of Bangladesh in 1971, the new government banned Jamaat-e-Islami from political participation since the government was secular and some of its leaders went into exile in Pakistan. Following the assassination of the first president and the military coup in 1975, the ban on the Jamaat was lifted and the new party Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh was formed.

[...] In 2010 the government, led by the Awami League, began prosecution of war crimes committed during the 1971 war under the International Crimes Tribunal. By 2012, two leaders of the BNP, one leader from Jatiyo Party and eight of Jamaat had been charged with war crimes, and by March 2013, three Jamaat leaders had been convicted of crimes. In response, the Jamaat held major strikes and protests across the country, which led to more than 60 deaths (mostly by security forces.)

The former leader of Jamaat-e-Islami, Bangladesh's largest Islamist party, was sentenced to 90 years in jail for crimes against humanity on 15 July 2013. [...]

In 1973, the government cancelled his citizenship for allegedly co-operating with Pakistani forces during the independence war.

Azam lived as an exile in Pakistan and the UK but returned to Bangladesh in 1978 when the country was led by Gen Ziaur Rahman - the assassinated husband of the country's current opposition leader [of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party] Khaleda Zia.

Minority community leaders, rights activists and liberal personalities have raised concerns over the call by acting chief of Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) Tarique Rahman, who stands convicted in a number of cases, for party men to mobilise on the streets for "regime change" on 28 October [2023].

[...] Rana Dasgupta said, considering the violent attacks orchestrated by BNP in the past, "this latest threat by Tarique is deeply concerning for the minorities in Bangladesh".

"Any political party that complies with the basic tenets of democracy should refrain from issuing such threats publicly," Dasgupta, general secretary of Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Oikya Parishad, added.

In the run-up to the 2014 national election, violence on the streets coupled with targeted attacks on minorities across the country still traumatise the victims, he observed

[jobaaj]

🚨𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐡!🚨 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑜𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚!!? 🚨 What’s going on?

Hundreds of students are protesting in universities and cities all over Bangladesh!

Things have gotten serious: 6 people have died and over 400 are hurt!

The government is shutting down all universities indefinitely!

🧐 Why?

Unfair job reservations.

Bangladesh brought back a 30% job quota for descendants of 1971 war freedom fighters.

Now, 56% of government jobs are reserved: 30% for freedom fighters' descendants, 10% for districts, 10% for women, 5% for ethnic minorities, and 1% for the physically disabled!

😲𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐲: - The students are not against the reservation for women, minorities, and so on, but are against the unjustified 30% quota for freedom fighters’ descendants! - They claim that it lowers the chances of the average Bangladeshi while simultaneously increasing discrimination. - PM Hasina’s Awami League has defended the reservation, stating that it was necessary to honour the sacrifices of the fighters. - Moreover, the party has accused the protesters of being ‘Razakars’, people who collaborated with Pakistan in 1971!!! ❓𝙸̲𝚜̲ ̲𝚜̲𝚞̲𝚌̲𝚑̲ ̲𝚊̲ ̲𝚛̲𝚎̲𝚜̲𝚎̲𝚛̲𝚟̲𝚊̲𝚝̲𝚒̲𝚘̲𝚗̲ ̲𝚛̲𝚎̲𝚊̲𝚕̲𝚕̲𝚢̲ ̲𝚗̲𝚎̲𝚌̲𝚎̲𝚜̲𝚜̲𝚊̲𝚛̲𝚢̲?? Follow Jobaaj Stories (the media arm of Jobaaj.com Group for more)

[sharunchowdhury]

Sharun Chowdhury: Victim of False News by Daily Sun and Banglanews

In a recent development, media outlets, including the Daily Sun and Banglanews24, have come under scrutiny for allegedly disseminating false and fabricated news targeting Sharun Chowdhury and his family. This controversy has arisen amidst claims of a personal rivalry between Nazmul Karim Sharun Chowdhury and Sayem Sobhan Anvir, the owner of the media conglomerate Bashundhara Group.

The media houses under question, including Daily Sun, Daily Kaler Kantho, Banglanews24, Kaler Kantho, and TV Channel News24, have been accused of consistently publishing baseless stories against Sharun Chowdhury and his family. Sharun and his father, Shamsul Hoque Chowdhury MP, who holds the position of Whip of the National Parliament, have now taken legal action by filing a $50 million defamation case against Ahmed Akbar Sobhan, the owner of Bashundhara Group, and Sayem Sobhan Anvir.

The dispute reportedly stems from a personal clash between Nazmul Karim Chowdhury Sharun, who is also a director of the Chittagong Chamber of Commerce and a prominent member of the Bangladesh Awami League, and Sayem Sobhan Anvir. Sharun claimed in various media outlets that this rivalry began due to allegations of an extramarital affair between Sayem Sobhan Anvir and Sharun’s ex-wife, Saifa Rahman Mims.

Sharun stated, “After our divorce, my ex-wife had nothing to do with me, but I don’t understand why Anvir and Saifa Mims ganged up to defame me and my family using their news media. It’s a shameless and unethical effort to use a media house against personal enmity. I have integrity, and the people know about me and my family. My father has been elected three times as a parliament member and is one of the most popular politicians in Chittagong. This low-class effort by Bashundhara-owned media cannot harm our reputation, as people know who we are. In fact, people have started boycotting them and their media.”

In a remarkable display of solidarity, more than 10,000 individuals from various corners of Chittagong gathered in front of the Chittagong Press Club to express their anger and support for Sharun Chowdhury and his family. The gathering was a response to the allegations of fake news being spread about them by media outlets owned by Bashundhara Group, including the Daily Sun and Banglanews24.

Fueled by outrage over what they perceive as a deliberate attempt to tarnish Sharun Chowdhury’s reputation, the protesters made their voices heard loud and clear. They came together to denounce the alleged false reporting and manipulative news coverage targeting Sharun and his family.

In a symbolic act of condemnation, the demonstrators set effigies of Sayem Sobhan Anvir and his father, Shah Alam, ablaze. These actions underscore the intensity of public sentiment against what they view as malicious activities by the media outlets associated with the Bashundhara Group.

This massive gathering not only highlights the deep-rooted anger within the community but also serves as a testament to the widespread support that Sharun Chowdhury enjoys in Chittagong. As this controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how these developments will impact the ongoing dispute between Sharun Chowdhury and the Bashundhara Group-owned media outlets.

This ongoing feud has not only drawn significant attention within political and media circles but has also raised questions about the role of media houses in personal conflicts. As the legal battle unfolds, the public awaits further developments in this high-profile case.

[tyhi]

from the article:

While the government is not releasing official statistics of fatalities and injuries, local media has estimated thousands have been injured and that the death toll has hit 115.

[...]

[The protests] began earlier this month on university campuses as students protested against the reintroduction of civil service job quotas that they say are discriminatory and benefit the Awami League, led by Sheikh Hasina, the prime minister.

This week, the protests have spread far beyond campus grounds and grown into a larger movement against Hasina’s government, which has ruled since 2009. Hasina is accused of overseeing rampant authoritarianism, police brutality and corruption, with her re-election in January boycotted by the opposition and widely documented as rigged. The country’s economy has also suffered a severe economic downturn since the outbreak of Covid, leaving tens of millions unemployed and grappling with record inflation.

Things are getting worse in Bangladesh.

[ebelal56-blog]

Revealing the Complexity of India-Bangladesh Relations

The relationship between India and Bangladesh is complex, rooted in historical, political, and geopolitical factors. Here are some key aspects that might help explain India's stance and its perceived reliance on the Awami League: 1. Historical Context 1971 Independence War: India played a critical role in Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan in 1971, under the leadership of the Awami League's Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. India provided military and logistical support to Bangladesh during the Liberation War, which cemented a strong relationship between the two nations, particularly with the Awami League. This historical bond has shaped India's trust in the Awami League. 2. Geopolitical and Security Concerns Regional Stability: India often views its relationship with Bangladesh through the lens of regional security. Over the years, the Indian government has been concerned about cross-border terrorism, insurgencies in its northeastern states, and illegal immigration. In this context, the Awami League, under Sheikh Hasina, has been seen as a reliable partner in addressing security concerns. Hasina's government has been cooperative in countering terrorism, managing border issues, and cracking down on anti-India groups. Islamist Extremism: India fears the rise of Islamist extremist groups in Bangladesh, some of which have ties to political parties like the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Jamaat-e-Islami. The BNP's association with Jamaat-e-Islami, a party seen as sympathetic to Pakistan and more conservative in its stance, has often been a concern for India, contributing to India's preference for the Awami League. 3. Economic and Strategic Interests Trade and Connectivity: Bangladesh is vital to India’s regional trade and connectivity strategy, especially for access to the northeastern states. The Awami League has been supportive of India’s plans to improve transit, trade, and infrastructure projects, strengthening bilateral ties. Energy and Water Sharing: India and Bangladesh have had contentious negotiations over shared rivers and energy cooperation. The Awami League has worked with India to resolve some of these issues, while other political factions in Bangladesh have historically opposed India’s dominance in these matters. 4. Perceived Dependency on Awami League Awami League as a Trusted Ally: Given the history and security cooperation, India sees the Awami League as a stable and predictable partner. This reliance can be seen as a pragmatic choice based on the party's past actions and positions, especially in comparison to the perceived volatility of other political factions. Creating a Narrative: The narrative that portrays other parties, particularly the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami, as hostile or "Jonggi" (terrorist) could be part of a broader political strategy. Some of it stems from the Awami League’s own internal politics, where it seeks to consolidate power by undermining its opponents. India, on its part, may view this through the lens of its own security and economic interests, amplifying concerns over Islamist extremism and anti-India sentiments. 5. Criticism of India's Approach Lack of Political Balance: Critics argue that India’s overt reliance on the Awami League undermines the democratic balance in Bangladesh, as it seems to favor one party over others. This has led to accusations that India is interfering in Bangladesh's internal politics, a point that has caused friction in Bangladeshi society. Perception of Control: Some in Bangladesh view India’s close relationship with the Awami League as a form of undue influence, particularly in sensitive areas like elections and governance. This has led to anti-Indian sentiments in some segments of the Bangladeshi population. In summary, India's perceived "anti-Bangladesh" stance and reliance on the Awami League can be seen as driven by security, economic, and historical reasons. However, this approach has its downsides, particularly in terms of Bangladesh's internal political dynamics and how other political factions perceive India's role.

[kimskashmir]

Shakib Al Hasan accused of murder during Bangladesh unrest, named in FIR along with 156 others

NEW DELHI — Bangladesh’s veteran all-rounder Shakib Al Hasan is amongst 156 people named in a murder case FIR filed in Dhaka’s Adabor area, in connection with the protests called by students in the country earlier this month. According to a report in Cricbuzz, the FIR was filed on August 22 by Rubel’s father, Rafiqul Islam, which names 154 local Awami League leaders and activists accused of his…

[infocrazebyrepwoop]

Murder Case Filed Against Sheikh Hasina and Top Officials Over Mohammadpur Police Shooting

A murder case has been filed against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and six other high-profile individuals in connection with the death of grocery shop owner Abu Sayed, who was killed in police firing in Dhaka’s Mohammadpur area on July 19. The incident occurred during a procession supporting the quota reform movement in Bosila. The other accused include Awami League General Secretary…

[sa7abnews]

Bangladesh protests threaten safety of religious minorities as temples burned, homes ransacked

New Post has been published on https://sa7ab.info/2024/08/09/bangladesh-protests-threaten-safety-of-religious-minorities-as-temples-burned-homes-ransacked/

Bangladesh protests threaten safety of religious minorities as temples burned, homes ransacked

Bangladesh has descended into chaos following the shock departure of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on Monday, with religious minorities targeted as riots spread throughout the country. “You people are descendants of the Awami League! This country is in a bad shape because of you. You should leave the country,” a mob shouted at Hindu residents of a mixed neighborhood, the BBC reported. Crowds gathered over the weekend to express intense anger at the economic turmoil that much of the country has suffered. Many believe that elites who aligned with the ruling Awami League party, however, have prospered in this time, giving way to deep anti-government sentiment. Those sentiments came to a head on Monday when protesters ransacked Hasina’s official residence, her party offices and a museum dedicated to her father, while Hasina resigned and fled to neighboring India. NOBEL LAUREATE TAPPED TO LEAD BANGLADESH AFTER EMBATTLED PRIME MINISTER’S OUSTERThe country has a makeup of 90% Muslims, with the rest of the population largely Hindu and very small pockets, around 5% each, of Buddhists and Christians. The ruling Awami League party, which Hasina led, is a secular group, but rivals often view Hindus as their supporters – making them prime targets for their anger in the wake of the prime minister’s flight. A crackdown on the protests prior to Hasina’s departure led to the deaths of over 200 people, which only inflamed the protests and strengthened resolve, The New York Times reported. The U.S. State Department urged Americans to avoid traveling to the country as civil unrest continues, going so far as to order all non-emergency U.S. government employees and their families to flee on Monday as protests grew more severe. “Travelers should not travel to Bangladesh due to ongoing civil unrest in Dhaka,” the State Department wrote in the advisory. “Violent clashes have occurred in the city of Dhaka, its neighboring areas, and throughout Bangladesh, and the Bangladeshi Army is deployed nationwide.”BANGLADESH STUDENT PROTESTERS TO MEET WITH MILITARY CHIEF AFTER OUSTING COUNTRY’S PMIndian Minister of External Affairs Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said on Tuesday that India remained “particularly” worried about the “minorities, their businesses and temples also… under attack at multiple locations. The full extent of this is still not clear.” “We are also monitoring the situation with regard to the status of minorities,” Jaishankar said. “There are reports of initiatives by various groups and organizations to ensure their protection and well-being. We welcome that, but will naturally remain deeply concerned till law and order is visibly restored.”The organization Open Doors, which tracks discrimination of Christians worldwide, ranked Bangladesh as having “very high” persecution levels, claiming that “converts to Christianity face the most severe restrictions, discrimination and attacks.””Religious beliefs are tied to the identity of the community, so turning from the locally dominant faith to following Jesus can result in accusations of betrayal,” the group wrote on its website. “Bangladeshi converts often gather in small house churches due to the risk of attack.”TRUMP ON RUSSIA PRISONER SWAP, WH FOREIGN POLICY: NOBODY RESPECTS BIDEN AND KAMALAThe Hindu reported that Hindu businesses and homes were targeted in the violence – at least 97 places on Monday and Tuesday “attacked, vandalized and looted,” according to Rana Dasgupta, the general secretary of the Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council. At least 10 Hindu temples were attacked on Monday, the council said, which raised concerns among European Union diplomats who expressed great concern over “reports of multiple attacks against places of worship and members of religious, ethnic and other minorities in Bangladesh.” “We urgently appeal to all parties to exercise restraint, reject communal violence and uphold the human rights of all Bangladeshis,” EU Ambassador to Bangladesh Charles Whiteley wrote on social media platform X.Hundreds of people were killed as Bangladeshi security forces cracked down on the demonstrations – violence that only fueled them, even after the quota system was dramatically scaled back.It showed that her government “wildly underestimated just how much anger there was among the public, and the sources of the anger which went beyond the issue of job quotas,” said Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center.The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

[qudachuk]

Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League party are seeking a fourth consecutive term and are accused of harassing the rival BNP partyIn Bangladesh, there is no more room left in the prisons. In the last two weeks alone, almost...

[xtruss]

U.S. Doubles Down Ahead of Bangladesh Vote

Supporters of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party take part in a rally in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on Dec. 10, 2022. Rehman Asad/AFP via Getty Images

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced a policy last week that reserves the right to deny visas to individuals in Bangladesh determined to be involved in efforts to hinder free and fair elections in the country and undermine the democratic process. Bangladesh’s national elections are scheduled for next January.

In recent years, Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has cracked down hard on the political opposition, the free press, and broader dissent. Bangladesh’s two previous elections, in 2014 and 2018, were marred by allegations of rigging.

Although harsh, the new U.S. measure isn’t surprising. Many members of Bangladesh’s political class travel regularly to the United States; some, including Hasina, have family members there. The Biden administration has made Bangladesh an example of its values-based foreign policy, which emphasizes promoting human rights and democracy overseas. U.S. officials have applied this approach selectively—Washington has said little publicly about democratic backsliding in New Delhi, for example. But in Bangladesh, the policy has been robust and consistent.

The Biden administration has sought to strengthen its relationship with Bangladesh, in part to reduce the country’s reliance on Chinese economic support. But the United States has put democracy at the forefront of all bilateral engagement with Bangladesh. U.S. officials have criticized democratic backsliding in Dhaka, and Washington hasn’t been afraid to back up its criticism with a big stick: In 2021, it sanctioned the Rapid Action Battalion, a Bangladeshi paramilitary force, for human rights violations.

Biden administration officials speak of the importance of free and fair elections in Bangladesh, but in private add they don’t want to have to decide if U.S. policy toward the country changes in the event of a rigged vote. The new visa policy, a strong incentive for Bangladesh’s political leaders to ensure free and fair elections, is likely aimed at avoiding that decision.

U.S. efforts to promote democracy in Bangladesh have been shaky, and Dhaka hasn’t responded kindly to Washington’s implied criticism. Some contacts in Bangladesh suggest the United States is fed up with Hasina’s ruling Awami League party and would prefer that the opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party win in January. In a parliamentary speech last month, Hasina indirectly accused Washington of trying to oust her government.

The visa policy pointedly applies to “any” individual that hinders free and fair elections. Government and opposition leaders in Bangladesh have both reacted favorably to the policy, with each suggesting the other side is in the crosshairs. Values-based foreign policy may provoke U.S. tensions with Bangladesh, but this latest measure could defuse them.

U.S. Ambassador to Bangladesh Peter Haas depicted the policy as a success for public diplomacy, showing that both Washington and Dhaka agree on the need for free and fair elections. Still, it’s worth asking why the Biden administration has made Dhaka a focus of its democracy promotion, especially given the risk of friction in a relationship that Washington is keen to strengthen. Bangladesh is neither a competitor like China nor a pariah state like Myanmar.

The answer may be simple. The United States believes that Bangladesh has not addressed its long-standing concerns about human rights and democracy, which predate the Biden administration. Recent actions could merely reflect policy continuity—and a tightening of the screws.

It’s also clear that one of the risks of pushing the democracy agenda in Bangladesh—driving it closer to China—may be exaggerated. In recent years, the United States was Bangladesh’s top export destination and its biggest source of foreign direct investment. Dhaka may value Chinese infrastructure support, but its commercial partnership with Washington is also critical. Moreover, Hasina and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoy close relations; Dhaka seeks to balance relations with all three powers.

Geopolitical considerations aside, a potential policy conundrum looms for Washington: What if Bangladesh’s 2024 election is not free or fair, despite the new U.S. visa measure? At that point, Washington may have to do what it hopes to avoid and reassess its policy toward Dhaka.

[jobaaj]

🚨𝐕𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐡🚨 𝟐𝟎𝟎+ 𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐝, 𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎+ 𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝!! 🤔 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐇𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐝?

⚠️ Violence has gripped Bangladesh.

🚨 Violent protests have erupted across multiple cities, tragically claiming the lives of 93 people!

🥊 Protesters clashed with security forces, resulting in hundreds of injuries and the torching of ruling Awami League offices!

🕒 A curfew has been imposed, the government is on a three-day holiday, and internet services have been terminated!

🧐 𝐖𝐡𝐲?

🌐 Due to ongoing protests.

📅 Last month, Bangladeshi students protested the government’s decision to reserve 30% of government jobs for descendants of freedom fighters!

⚖️ While the Supreme Court did rule the reservations back, it did not terminate them.

🚓 Moreover, the government began rounding up protesters and their families, arresting thousands (mostly Opposition leaders), and issued shoot-on-sight orders to stamp out the protests!!

📉 A record 270 people have died since July, and over 10,300 have been arrested!

😲𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐲: - The protesters have accused PM Hasina of acting like a dictator and using excessive force to extinguish dissent! - They now want PM Hasina to resign and face trial! - PM Hasina has denied all charges and called the protesters criminals who aimed to destabilize the nation!! ❓𝙸̲𝚜̲ 𝚝̲𝚑̲𝚒̲𝚜̲ 𝚊 𝚜̲𝚒̲𝚖̲𝚙̲𝚕̲𝚎̲ 𝚙̲𝚛̲𝚘̲𝚝̲𝚎̲𝚜̲𝚝̲ 𝚖̲𝚘̲𝚟̲𝚎̲𝚖̲𝚎̲𝚗̲𝚝̲? 𝙾̲𝚛̲ 𝚊̲ 𝚕̲𝚊̲𝚛̲𝚐̲𝚎̲𝚛̲ 𝚙̲𝚘̲𝚕̲𝚒̲𝚝̲𝚒̲𝚌̲𝚊̲𝚕̲ 𝚐̲𝚊̲𝚖̲𝚎̲?? Follow Jobaaj Stories (the media arm of Jobaaj.com Group for more)

Follow Jobaaj Stories (the media arm of Jobaaj Group) for more updates. Jobaaj Stories started as a storytelling branch and now includes news, inspiring stories, and valuable information. Our mission is to educate and inspire young professionals and students through storytelling, providing you with information and motivation.

[thedailyexcelsior]

Former Pak Minister Sheikh Rashid Arrested

Awami Muslim League (AML) leader and PTI ally, Sheikh Rashid Ahmed, was arrested by Islamabad police in the early hours of Thursday.  Ahmed was taken into custody in connection with remarks he allegedly made against former president Asif Ali Zardari, accusing him of hatching a “murder plot to eliminate PTI chief Imran Khan”.

[umarfarooqzahoor]

UAE Lifts up Its Bilateral Relationships with Bangladesh

Lifting up of bilateral relationships are helpful at strengthening both the nations. Every time leaders unite to unify their strategies for multiplying their strength & shortening the time to accomplish success.

Leaders have the ability to influence millions with their soft skills and leadership qualities to align the efforts of masses in the right directions. Due to the authoritative guidance of influential people such as Sheikh Umar Farooq Zahoor, it is possible to swiftly succeed in achieving the goals one is working upon.

These leaders constantly work towards the welfare of the society ultimately assisting at growth and developments of the nations altogether. Let’s dig deeper and try to evaluate what are the advantages when nations decide to work together.

Sheikh Hasina: Empowered Prime Minister of Bangladesh

The honourable Sheikh Hasina Wazed, also known as Sheikh Hasina was a popular politician of East Pakistan (Now called as Bangladesh). She was born on September, 28, 1947, at Tungipara, East Pakistan (Now Called as Bangladesh). She was a Bengali Politician and also leader of the Awami League Political Party. She served twice as a Prime Minister of Bangladesh (1996–2001, 2009-present).

Early Life of Sheikh Hasina

Sheikh Hasina was the daughter of Sheikh Mujibue Rahman. Her father was the principal orchestrator of separation of Bangladesh from Pakistan in 1971. She got married to M.A. in 1968. Wazed Miah, was an eminent scientist from Bengal.

Sheikh Hasina has been very active in politics since her graduation days. She was in University of Dhaka during that time of 1960s. She also served as liaison when her father was imprisoned by the Pakistani government. During that time her family and other members were also detained, because they were involved in 1971 in an uprising when there was the war of Liberation that took Bangladesh to its Independence.

Later on August, 15, 1975, her father was assassinated along with mother and other three brothers in their home by the military officers. Her father a few months earlier became the leader of Bangladesh. Hasina Sheikh was out of the country during that incident and later on spent six long years in exile. Awami League, was the largest political organisation at that time in Bangladesh founded by her father and she was elected as leader of it.

Sheikh Hasina’s Rise in Politics

When she returned in 1981, she was a popularly outspoken advocate of democracy. Due to this she was arrested multiple times. Later, she was chosen as a leader of opposition in the parliament where she took measures for the securing of basic human rights. This initiative also involved the violence of military rule. The last military leader Lieut. Gen. Hussain Mohammed Ershad resigned as a response to an ultimatum that was issued by Sheikh Hasina was also supported by maximum people of Bangladesh.

The Leadership Shift Phase

The first general election was held in 1991 in Bangladesh in sixteen years. Khaleda Zia was chosen after the election. In June 1996 Sheikh Hasina was elected as New Prime Minister and she served in office till 2001. On December 29 after the lifting of the emergency again the general elections were held. This time Awami League swept the solid majority. She was chosen prime minister in January 2009 again.

Over time, there were the faces when Hasina and her party faced accusations. Many opposition members were also arrested. BNP and many opposition groups decided to boycott the 2014 polls. In 2018, another incident happened Khaleda was jailed on the charges of embezzlement & graft. That year Awami League again had a glorious victory. She took oath as Prime Minister on January 6, 2009.

Meeting with Sheikh Umar Farooq Zahoor to Establish Economic Ties & Strengthen Bilateral Relationships

Sheikh Umar Farooq Zahoor is well-known businessmen of Dubai, UAE. He has been operating successful businesses in multiple sectors, in UAE and in some other countries too. Apart from performing his duties as an honest businessman, he is also consistently involved in serving welfare activities and initiatives for the society.

He has been a part of multiple summits, and growth & development oriented initiatives, such as Dubai Auto Expo Event, and much more. Besides, he is investing his time at building up priceless relationships amongst leaders to work together and grow together. He met Prime Minister of Bangladesh Honourable Sheikh Hasina Wajid. People really love her devotion and hard work she commits in her efforts to build a bright future for the nation.

The meeting was flooded with ideas and laid paths to strategize them for executing smoothly in future. This carved a mile laid to hit another milestone. These are associated with the fact that it will not only strengthen economic ties but also nurture bilateral relations between the two nations.

Phrases for Summing Up,

Leaders have been travelling long distances to attend meetings to take crucial decisions for the communal welfare of the nations. These involve activities to support several initiatives, like, decreasing carbon emission, sustainable development, eradicating poverty, or raising the infrastructure level, empowering people, strengthening bilateral relationships and much more. This helps to devise strategies and lay them down into action for moving towards the path of growth and success. This meeting is also envisioned to proceed with the strategies devised by them to accomplish futuristic goals.

[ebelal56-blog]

The Untold Story of Hasina's Undemocratic Reign

Extrajudicial killings in Bangladesh have become a grim reality, a haunting specter that looms over the lives of many, casting a long shadow on the very essence of justice and human rights. The Rapid Action Battalion, or RAB, was born in 2004, heralded as a force meant to combat crime and restore order. Yet, what was once a promise of safety has morphed into a tool of terror. This paramilitary force, operating under the Ministry of Home Affairs, has been implicated in a litany of abuses that would make any civilized society shudder. Extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and torture have become synonymous with its operations. The term "crossfire" has entered the lexicon of despair, a euphemism for the cold-blooded execution of individuals deemed undesirable by those in power. Each incident is cloaked in a shroud of secrecy, leaving families to mourn in silence, searching for answers that may never come. The political landscape in Bangladesh is a treacherous terrain, dominated by the Awami League, led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The ruling party has been accused of wielding state machinery like a weapon, targeting dissenters and opposition figures with ruthless efficiency. It is a game of power, where the stakes are human lives, and the rules are dictated by those who sit atop the political hierarchy. The cries of the oppressed are drowned out by the thunderous applause of loyalists, who have been conditioned to believe that the ends justify the means. In this twisted narrative, the very fabric of democracy is frayed, and the voices of the people are muffled under the weight of authoritarianism. Human rights organizations, both local and international, have documented the horrors that unfold in the shadows. The reports are chilling, detailing cases where individuals vanish without a trace, only to be found later, lifeless and discarded like refuse. Activists, journalists, and political opponents are not just silenced; they are erased. The Digital Security Act has become a weapon of choice, a means to stifle dissent in the digital age, where a single tweet can lead to a knock on the door in the dead of night. The fear is palpable, a constant companion for those who dare to speak out against the regime. Yet, amidst this bleak landscape, there are those who refuse to be silenced. Civil society activists and human rights groups continue to document these atrocities, risking their lives to bring the truth to light. They march in the streets, their voices rising above the cacophony of oppression, demanding accountability and justice. But the price of dissent is steep. Many have faced threats, harassment, and even violence for their courage. It is a perilous path, yet they tread it with unwavering resolve, fueled by the belief that change is possible, that the tide can turn. The international community has not turned a blind eye to these abuses. Organizations like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have condemned the actions of the Bangladeshi government, calling for an end to the impunity that has allowed these violations to flourish. In December 2021, the United States imposed sanctions on RAB and its officials, a move that sent ripples through the corridors of power in Dhaka. Yet, the government often dismisses these allegations, framing them as necessary measures to maintain law and order. It is a narrative crafted to deflect scrutiny, to paint a picture of a nation under siege, where the state is the only bulwark against chaos. But the truth is far more complex. The judiciary, meant to be the guardian of justice, is often shackled by political influence, rendering it ineffective in the face of such egregious violations. Legal and judicial challenges abound, with victims and their families facing insurmountable obstacles in their quest for justice. The system is rigged, a cruel joke played on those who dare to seek redress. The very institutions that should protect the rights of the people have become complicit in their oppression. As the sun sets over the city, casting long shadows on the streets, the struggle for justice continues. The voices of the disappeared echo in the hearts of their loved ones, a haunting reminder of the cost of silence. The fight against extrajudicial killings in Bangladesh is not just a battle for accountability; it is a fight for the soul of a nation. It is a call to uphold the rule of law, to ensure that no one is above justice, and to restore faith in a system that has been corrupted by power.