#Averostran
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
jarvistheallosaurus · 1 year ago
Text
Dandakosaurus Indicus
Tumblr media
Dandakosaurus was a large carnivorous theropod, wait let me rephrase that, the FIRST large theropod to ever walk the earth. This Early Jurassic theropod was the first to ever exceed 2 tons, making it a truly exceptional predator. Like, for reals can we step back from the massive Tyrannosaurids/Carcharodontosaurids, and appreciate its magnificence? Like, it really said go big or go home for reals. However, with all that being said, the dinosaur is known from extremely fragmentary remains unfortunately. The holotype, GSI 1/54Y/76, only contains a pubis, which leads many paleontologists to question its existence. If it did truly in fact walk the face of the earth at some point, then it will forever be remembered in hostory as the first large theropod. Stats: Length: ~33ft (10 m) Height: ~13ft (4 m) Weight: ~2.3 tons (4600 lbs) Area: Andhra Pradesh (India)  Time: 200-182 mya Formation: Kota Formation of India Family: Averostran/primitive Tentanuran/ Ceratosaurid. Species: D. Indicus 
15 notes · View notes
gaetaniu · 7 months ago
Text
Identificata in Inghilterra una nuova specie di dinosauro teropode del Giurassico
Rappresentazione artistica di Dornraptor normani. Il paleontologo Matthew Baron della BPP University ha identificato un dinosauro carnivoro precedentemente sconosciuto del Dorset, in Inghilterra, sulla base di fossili raccolti negli anni ’50 del XIX secolo. Si ritiene che Dornraptor normani sia vissuto nel primo Giurassico, circa 200 milioni di anni fa. Questa nuova specie ù un averostran, un

Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
whendinosaursruledtheworld · 6 years ago
Text
Daily Dinosaur Fact: Day 7
Tumblr media
Ceratosaurus isn’t actually horned. The lumps on its heads are in fact crests, and were most likely used as a form of display.
4 notes · View notes
a-dinosaur-a-day · 6 years ago
Text
Teinurosaurus sauvagei
Tumblr media
By Ripley Cook
Etymology: Extended Tail Reptile
First Described By: Nopcsa, 1928
Classification: Dinosauromorpha, Dinosauriformes, Dracohors, Dinosauria, Saurischia, Eusaurischia, Theropoda, Neotheropoda, Averostra
Status: Extinct
Time and Place: Probably sometime in the Tithonian age of the Late Jurassic, sometime between 152.1 and 145 million years ago. 
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Teinurosaurus is known from the Mont-Lambert Formation of Nord Pas de Calais, France. 
Tumblr media
Physical Description: Teinurosaurus was named off of a single vertebra that has since been destroyed. That vertebra was from the tail, and fairly small, so it’s not really useful in saying anything about this dinosaur. As a theropod, it would have been bipedal; anything beyond that in terms of form, specializations, and appearance, is difficult to say. It probably would have had feathers, though that is also a question given we know almost nothing about this dinosaur.
Diet: Probably meat
Behavior: Unknown
Ecosystem: Teinurosaurus lived in a Late Jurassic ecosystem in France, which at the time was part of a tropical island system in Europe, scattered in shallow water. This Mont-Lambert Formation had other dinosaurs, though they’re poorly known - Iguanodonts, Megalosaurids, and potentially even Sauropods are known from the area, as well as marine reptiles. The skeleton of Teinurosaurus probably washed out to sea, which lead to its preservation.
Other: Teinurosaurus was originally misreported as being from Portugal because its description happened to be buried in a book describing a bunch of dinosaurs from Portugal; however, it was actually from France. It has a complex taxonomic history, which is fun, because it is a poorly known dinosaur named off of a single vertebra that was lost.
~ By Meig Dickson
Sources under the cut 
Galton, P. M., H. P. Powell. 1980. The Ornithischian Dinosaur Camptosaurus prestwichii from the Upper Jurassic of England. Palaeontology 23 (2): 411 - 443.
Nopcsa, F. 1928. The Genera of Reptiles. Palaeobiol 1: 163 - 188.
Nopcsa, F. 1929. Addendum ‘The Genera of Reptiles’. Palaeobiol 1: 201.
Olshevsky, G. 1978. The Archosaurian Taxa (Excluding the Crocodylia). Mesozoic Meanderings 1: 1 - 50.
Sauvage, H.-E. 1888. On the Reptiles Found in the Upper Portlandian of Boulogne-sur-Mer. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 3e 16: 623 - 632.
Von Huene, F. 1932. The Fossil Reptile Order Saurischia, their Development and History. Monographien zur Geologie und Palaeontologie, serie 1 4 (1-2): 1 - 361.
137 notes · View notes
iamthekaijuking · 2 years ago
Note
was just admiring my favorite monster the Great Izuchi when I noticed it lacks the classic "raptor killing claws on its feet". This combined with its prominent hand claws suggest to me that they aren't Maniraptorans but possibly derived Megaraptorans, a dinosaur clade without much representation!
While Megaraptorans have traditionally been an ABSOLUTE PAIN to classify, switching back and forth between Coelurosauria and Carcarharodontosauria, the latest research this year may have finally placed them in the former possibly as a sister taxon to Tyrannosauroidea.
Megaraptorans have always been hard to classify given their weird hybridization of both primitive and derived avetheropodan features, and every few years their placement switches between tyrannosaurs and Allosaurs. It doesn’t really help that our knowledge of theropod evolution and classification right after the Triassic-Jurassic extinction is pretty iffy in some places (then again, so is our knowledge of nearly all life during the time period) and megaraptorans just kinda popped up in the early Cretaceous, which leaves us with a big evolutionary gap. Honestly I personally think that we won’t really know what megaraptorans truly are anytime soon if nothing short of a full skeleton is found. But hey keep entertaining the idea of a megaraptor izuchi if that’s what you like!
On my end though I don’t really think any of the dog wyverns save for maccao are close to my hypothetical bird/flying Wyvern parave family. In fact I don’t even think they’re maniraptorians. None of them have raptorial second toe claws (a key feature in early paraves), and jaggi and baggi actually have vestigial thumbs, which puts their finger count at four. Personally I’m on the fence with classifying Jaggi, Baggi, Wroggi, and Izuchi as either ceratosaurs (possibly specifically noasaurs), pre averostran neotheropods, or even late surviving herrerasaurs.
23 notes · View notes
jurassicsunsets · 7 years ago
Note
Do you have any resources that could give me a good overall explanation of dinosaur classification? I’m pretty new to paleoblr and I get mixed up with all of the names floating around. Thanks and sorry if I bothered you!
I don’t - but I’ll be happy to write a bit!
1. What is a “Dinosaur”?
This may seem obvious, but it’s a bit more subtle. To scientists, “Dinosauria” is a group containing the most recent creature that was the ancestor of T. rex, Triceratops, and Brontosaurus, and everything descended from that ancestor. This means that birds, as descendants of dinosaurs, are included under that definition, while pterosaurs and most mesozoic sea reptiles like plesiosaurs are not.
This kind of group is called a “node-based group”, and is written as (Tyrannosaurus+Triceratops+Brontosaurus).
There’s also “stem-based groups”, which is “everything closer related to X than to Y”. A good example of this is reptilia, which is something like (Alligator>Homo) [that is, everything closer to alligators than to people!].
2. 3 main groups
There’s three main groups of dinosaurs - theropods, sauropodomorphs, and ornithischians. The simplest (though not always accurate) way of thinking about these is that theropods are two-legged meat-eaters, sauropodomorphs are long-necked plant eaters, and ornithischians are beaked plant-eaters.
For a long time it was accepted that theropods and sauropodomorphs were each others’ closest relatives, in a group called saurischia, and that this group was in turn the closest relatives of ornithischians. Recent analyses show that this may not be entirely accurate - it may be that theropods and ornithischians are united in a group called ornithoscelida, and that sauropodomorphs are the closest relative of this group. There’s good reasons to think each is true, and there’s going to need to be more research done in the future, and hopefully more fossils will straighten things out.
3. Ornithischia
Nearly all ornithischians have three things in common: 
They’re mainly herbivores
They have a special bone on their lower jaw called a predentary that formed part of a beak
Part of their hips faces backwards, allowing more room for guts (important because plants are hard to digest!)
There’s three main groups of ornithischians, as well as a bunch that don’t really fit into any of those groups.
The most significant of these “oddballs” are the heterodontosaurs, a group of early ornithischians that mainly lived in the jurassic and triassic periods. They’re generally small (60-200cm in length) two-legged omnivores or herbivores that had big fangs that were probably used for display. They’re kind of the weird cousins of all other ornithischians.
Thyreophorans
This literally means “shield bearers”, and as you might expect it includes the armoured dinosaurs like Stegosaurus and Ankylosaurus. It also includes some weird early forms like Scutellosaurus. It’s defined as (Ankylosaurus>Triceratops).
>Eurypods
This is specifically (Stegosaurus+Ankylosaurus), so it’s contained within thyreophora.
>>Ankylosauria
This is (Ankylosaurus>Stegosaurus), and contains the most heavily armoured dinosaurs. It’s divided into Ankylosauridae (ones with tail clubs), Nodosauridae (which have bigger shoulder spikes), and possibly also Polacanthidae (which have more sticky-up spikes, but also might just be nodosaurids)
>>Stegosauridae
This is (Stegosaurus>Ankylosaurus), and contains the familiar plated dinosaurs. It includes Stegosauridae (the big ones like Stegosaurus) and Huayangosauridae (some smaller Chinese forms).
Neornithischia
This group is defined as (Parasaurolophus>Stegosaurus/Ankylosaurus). It contains two major groups - the Marginocephalians and the Ornithopods, but also a bunch of important basal members, like Thescelosauridae, Kulindadromeus and Hypsilophodon - animals that were once thought to be ornithopods but probably aren’t.
Marginocephalia
This is (Pachycephalosaurus+Triceratops). The name means “rimmed head”, because
.both major groups have big stuff around their heads.
>Pachycephalosauria 
These are the “bone-headed” dinosaurs like Pachycephalosaurus. It’s (Pachycephalosaurus>Triceratops)
>Ceratopsia
This is (Triceratops>Pachycephalosaurus), and contains the beakiest of all dinosaurs. Chaoyangosaurids are frill-less, hornless, 2-legged forms; Bagaceratopsids, Leptoceratopsids, and Protoceratopsids are hornless but increasingly frilled and 4-legged groups.
>>Ceratopsidae
This is (Centrosaurus+Triceratops), and contains the big, 4-legged, horned guys. Centrosaurines usually have smaller frills with big horns around them, smaller brow horns, and bigger nose horns, while Chasmosaurines usually have bigger frills, bigger brow horns, and smaller nose horns.
Ornithopoda
This is (Parasaurolophus>Triceratops). It used to contain a bunch more stuff, but now it mostly contains just Iguanodonts, so for most purposes those are the same thing (except for some southern forms called Elasmaria that don’t come up much). Doesn’t matter as much as it used to; them’s the breaks. It includes Rhabdodontids, a weirdogroup of small bipedal guys from Europe, and Dryomorpha.
>>Dryomorpha
This is (Dryosaurus+Iguanodon). It contains Dryosauridae, a group of fast-running ornithopods, and Ankylopollexians, the group that had the famous “thumb-spikes). 
>>>Styracosterna
Except for a few species, this is about the same as Ankylopollexia. It contains a bunch of species, most of which used to just be called Iguanodon, as well as the Hadrosauriformes, which contains the Hadrosauroids, which contains the Hadrosauromorphs, which contains the Hadrosaurids (whew!)
>>>>Harosauridae
These are the “Duck-bills”. It contains the Lambeosaurines, which had big long hollow crests they could use to HONK !, as well as the Hadrosaurines, which didn’t have hollow crests.
4. Sauropodomorpha
This group is mainly made up of long-necked plant eaters. It starts off with a bunch of things we used to call “Prosauropods”, but now call

.basal sauropodomorphs. It may include Herrersauridae (Pedants be quiet), a group of early, early predators. It probably includes Guaibasaurids, a group of small omnivores from the triassic. It also includes Plateosaurids, a group of larger (but still bipedal), long-necked herbivores. From here we go into Massopoda, a group that includes Massospondylids and Riojasaurids, which
are similar to plateosaurids, as well as Sauropodiformes.
Sauropodiformes is where we start to get more sauropod-y, though we still have to zoom through Anchisauria to get to actual sauropods. We’re there now.
Sauropoda
These guys are actually quadrupedal! Here we’ve got
.more sliding groups. There’s a bunch of early sauropods that are quite cool, but I’m not gonna name them. The fun group is Gravisauria. This includes some early guys calls Vulcanodonts, and Eusauropods,
Eusauropods include – you guessed it! More grades. There’s some interesting features here though - Mamenchisaurids are a bunch of Chinese forms with super long necks, and I can’t say I know anything remarkable about Turiasaurs. You’ll have to talk to John about that one.
Neosauropoda
Here’s where you’ll start recognising things if you haven’t already. This is (Saltasaurus+Diplodocus), and contains the most famous sauropods. It’s split into two main groups.
>Diplodocoidea
There are the “whip-tails” (again, pedants be quiet!). It contains Dicraeosaurids,  a few weird, short-necked, double sailed things, Rebbachisaurids, a group of wide-mouthed weirdos, and Diplodocids, the famous great swan-necked ones that are some of the largest dinosaurs ever.
>Macronaria
This group contains some basal forms like Camarasaurus, and two main groups (Maybe?? This is kind of a contentious area). Brachiosaurids include the giant, super-tall ones, and some little ones also. Then there’s the monster that is Somphospondyli. This contains
.more grades, the Euhelopodids, and the Titanosaurs.
>>Titanosauria.
This is a real monster, let me tell you. It includes more grades – yay! – and Lithostrotia. 
>>>Lithostrotia
This is where titanosaurs start getting armoured (except it’s not really that simple, since others have armour, and it may have evolved multiple times, and
..lots of stuff). It also includes the real giants like Lognkosaurs, Aeolosaurs, and Saltasaurs.
5. Theropods
These are the two-legged meat-eaters – although many are omnivorous or herbivorous! They include some early forms and Neotheropods. (From here on, except when notes, groups in big font include the rest of the groups listed below).
Neotheropods
These include the early, long-necked Coelophysoids and Dilophosaurids (which may well be more advanced possibly even Tetenurans!). This group also contains the:
Averostrans
Literally “bird beaks”, although they didn’t all have beaks. It includes the Ceratosaurs, a group that contains some weird forms, and the Abelisaurs (large, short-armed, and bulldog faced) and the Noasaurs (Small, longer arms, need a good orthodontist).
Averostrans also include the:
Tetenurans
Named after their stiffened tails, around here is where theropods lost their fourth finger. After some basal forms it includes the:
>Megalosauroids
These consist of two main groups - the heavily built Megalosaurids and the fish-specialist Spinosaurids.
Tetenurae also includes the:
Avetheropods
This consists of the Carnosaurs and the Coelurosaurs.
>Carnosaurs
These are your big sauropod killers. They include Metriacanthosaurids and Allosaurids, as well as Carcharodontosaurians. This last group is divided into Carcharodontosaurids, which includes some of the largest predators ever to walk the Earth, and the Neovenatorids, a smaller group that MAY contain the Megaraptorans.
The other group of avetheropods is the:
Coelurosaurs
This is the earliest that we can definitively say, with pretty good certainty, that all members had feathers. It includes some basal forms and the:
Tyannoraptors

.which hands-down win the coolest name competition. This group includes the Tyrannosauroids, which I’m sure need no introduction.
It may also include the famously small Compsognathids, but those may also be outside tyrannoraptora.
It also contains the:
Maniraptoriformes
This group is the earliest we can say that all members had wings. It includes the famous “ostrich dinosaurs” or Ornithomimosaurs, and the:
Maniraptora
This group is where we first see the wing-folding ability like in modern birds. It includes the tiny, 1-fingered Alvarezsauroids and, at the other end of the spectrum, the giant, long-necked, pot-bellied, wickedly-clawed, plant-eating Therizinosaurs. It also includes the:
Pennaraptors
This group is the earliest place we see true vaned feathers. It includes the Oviraptorosauria, a group of typically beaked and crested omnivores and herbivores, as well as the
Eumaniraptors
AKA Paravians - it’s the difference between a stem-based and node-based group, but they’re essentially the same.
This group includes the really birdy things, like Anchiornis and the dragon-like Scansoriopterygids (really rolls off the tongue after some practice, I promise!). It also includes the famous “Raptors” – the Dromaeosaurids. There’s also the sickle-clawed but more omnivorous or herbivorous Troodontids, famous for their brains. This latter group may be a sister group to Dromaeosauridae, or it may be closer to:
Avialae
This is (Passer>Troodon, Deinonychus). It’s what most scientists would call “birds”. It includes some early forms exemplified by Archaeopteryx and Jeholornis, as well as:
Pygostylia
This is birds with shortened, fused tails. It’s (Confuciusornis+Passer), and includes the cool streamer-tailed Confuciusornithids. It also includes:
Ornithothoraces
This group of birds is (Enantiornis+Passer). It includes the very successful and widespead (but now extinct) bird group called the Enantiornithines. It also includes the
Euornithines
This is where we first see birds with modern-style tails. It includes some basal forms at the 
Ornithuromorphs
This group contains some early groups, the Hongshanornithids and the Songlingornithids,  and the:
Ornithurans
This is sort of the “last burst” before we get to true birds! It includes the seagull-like Ichthyornis and the seal-like Hesperornithines. From here on out, everything is included in the:
Neornithines
We’ve made it! This is true birds - no teeth here. From here we’re divided into – What, did you think we were done? – we’re divided into the Palaeognaths and the Neognaths.
Palaeognaths include giant flightless birds like ostriches and emus, as well as the kiwi and the chicken-like Tinamids.
Neognaths
This contains all the familiar birds. 
One major group is the Galloanserans. 
These include the Odontoanseres, possibly* including the albatross-like Pelagornithids as well as the famous “horse-eating” (but actually vegetarian) Gastornithids and Dromornithids, and ducks, geese, swans, and screamer birds in Anseriformes.
*Pelagornithids may be more basal galloanserans or neognaths
Galloanserae also includes Pangalliformes, which consists of megapode fowl, chickens, turkeys, pheasants, peacocks, the whole shebang.
Neognathae also includes the:
Neoaves
From here taxonomy does get a bit muddled for a while. I’ll present the two major hypotheses.
1. Columbea/Passerea hypothesis
The Columbimorphs consists of Columbiformes or pigeons and doves, Pteroclidoformes or sandgrouse, and Mesitornithiformes or Mesites.
Columbimorphs may be closest to Mirandornithes, which consists of Phoenicopteriformes or flamingoes, and Podicepidiformes or grebes. If so, this clade is called Columbea.
The rest of the birds in this hypothesis belong in a clade called Passerea.
Otidomorphs are a group consisting of Otidids or bustards, Cuculiformes or cuckoos, and Musopagoformes or turacos.
Otidomorphs may be closest to Strisores, which include Apodiformes (Hummingbirds and swifts) and Caprimulgiformes (Nightjars, owlet-nightjars, and frogmouths). In this case their clade is Otidae, not to be confused with Otididae.
The rest of the birds in this hypothesis clade together in a clade called Litoritelluraves.
Gruae may be a group consisting of Opisthocomids (Hoatzins), Charadriiformes (Gulls, terns, puffins, plovers, sandpipers), and Gruiformes (Cranes, rails).
The rest of the birds in this hypothesis clade together in an unnamed clade.
This group contains the Telluraves (more on them later!) and the:
Ardeae
This consists of Eurypygimorphs, consisting of Eurypigids (Sunbitterns) and Phaethoniformes (Tropicbirds).
Ardeae may also include:
Aequornithes
This group of waterbirds includes Gaviiformes (divers/loons), Austrodyptornithes (a clade that includes Sphenisciformes [Penguins] and Procellariiformes [Albatrosses, petrels]), Ciconiiformes (Storks), Suliformes (Boobies, gannets, cormorants), and Pelicaniformes (Pelicans, herons, ibises).
2. Columbaves Hypothesis
Strisores may be the earliest to branch off of Neoaves.
Columbimorphs may alternatively be closest to Otidomorphs,  If so, this clade is called Columbaves.
The rest of the birds in this hypothesis clade together in an unnamed clade.
Gruiformes may have been the earliest to branch off in this clade.
The rest of the birds in this hypothesis clade together in an unnamed clade.
The Aequorlitornithes (Not to be confused with Aequornithes) may consist of Mirandornithes clading with Charadriiformes as a sister group to a clade between Eurypygimorphs and Aequornithes.
Also included in this unnamed clade is the
Inopaves
This may consist of Opisthocomids and Telluraves.
Telluraves – Back to your regularly scheduled program
There’s actually, to my knowledge, some degree of concensus here. It’s divided into two main groups - Afroaves and Australaves.
Australaves  consists of Cariamiformes (seriemas and terror birds) and Eufalconimorphae.
>Eufalconimorphae consists of Falconiformes (Falcons, kestrels, and caracaras), as well as Psittacopasserans.
>>Psittacopasserans consist of Psittacoformes (Parrots and their ilk) and Passeriformes (Perching birds, which I’m not going into more detail on because I’d be here for a month).
Afroaves
This clade consists of Accipterimophs (New-world vultures, hawks, eagles, old-world vultures, kites), and an unnamed clade.
Unnamed clade
This clade consists of Strigiformes (owls and kin) and Coraciimorphs.
Coraciimorphs
This clade consists of Coliiformes (mousebirds), the cuckoo-roller, and Cavitaves.
Cavitaves
This clade consists of the Trogonids (Trogons and Quetzals) and the Picocoraciae.
Picocoraciae
This clade consists of Bucerotiformes (Hornbills, hoopoes, woodhoopoes) and the Picodynastornithes.
Picodynastornithes
Last one! This consists of Coraciiformes (Kingfishers, rollers, motmots, and bee eaters), and the Piciformes, or toucans, barbets, and woodpeckers.
230 notes · View notes
ornithopsis · 8 years ago
Note
Have you considered adding Daemonosaurus, Chilesaurus and/or a few averostrans to Baron et al.'s matrix?
Yes, I’ve spent the last couple days working on including Buriolestes, Ixalerpeton, and Chilesaurus in the dataset Baron et al. had, and will probably eventually work on adding Daemonosaurus as well.
1 note · View note
diplotomodon · 8 years ago
Text
Dinosaur March Madness 2k17: Stinkin’ Theropods
A bunch of other people were listing their choices so I figured hey why not, I haven’t jumped on a bandwagon in a while
Non-Averostran Theropods: Daemonosaurus, for having a cool name and a cool skull
Ceratosaurs: Ceratosaurus, because tbh I think it’s a little underappreciated and we should all cherish it
Basal Tetanurans & Megalosaurs: Spinosaurus, because I’m a basic bitch
Carnosaurs: Giganotosaurus (see above)
Miscellaneous Coelurosaurs: Scipionyx, my man, the little Italian friendo
Tyrannosauroids: Dryptosaurus, clearly the best dinosaur known from woefully incomplete remains, is a Jethro Tull species if you squint hard enough, go Jersey etc. etc.
Ornithomimosaurs: Struthiomimus, because Duck Satan was last year
Alvarezsaurs: Albertonykus, because if you don’t get the joke yet why are you even still here
Therizinosaurs: Beipiaosaurus, for dint of being charmingly menacing and floofy
Oviraptorosaurs: Gigantoraptor, because if we can’t have Duck Satan then Chicken Satan will begin its reign
Dromaeosaurs: Zhenyuanlong, because why let Dakotaraptor have all the fun
Troodontids & Basal Avians: Sapeornis, for the exact same reason that archosaurophilia gives
Enantiornithes: Gobipteryx, because palates
Non-Neornithean Euornithes: Baptornis, because it’s objectively better than Hesperornis. Fight me
9 notes · View notes
cry-olophosaurus · 8 years ago
Text
My DMM 2017 Votes for Non-Neornithean Theropods!
As if anyone actually cares.... here’s what I’m voting for Dinosaur March Madness so far (you should vote too!).
Non-Averostran Theropods -> Dracovenator
Ceratosaurs -> Ceratosaurus
Basal Tetanurans and Megalosaurs -> Cryolophosaurus (duh????)
Carnosaurs -> Acrocanthosaurus
Misc. Ceolurosaurs -> Aniksosaurus (tbh, I have to vote for the dinosaur that sounds like my first name... it’s like a rule)
Tyrannosauroids -> Guanlong (literally one of my favorite dinos)
Ornithomimosaurs -> Struthiomimus
Alvarezsaurs -> Alvarezsaurus 
Therizinosaurs -> Falcarius
Oviraptorosaurs -> Khaan
Dromaeosaurs -> Achillobator (this is what the main dinosaur character in my webcomic will be, so I gotta)
Troodontids and Basal Avialans -> Balaur (another fav of mine!)
Enantiornithes -> Avisaurus (bird. lizard.)
Non-Neornithean Euornithes -> Ichthyornis
14 notes · View notes
a-dinosaur-a-day · 8 years ago
Conversation
Dinosaur Group D&D Alignments
Lawful Good: Marginocephalians (Pachycephalosaurs & Ceratopsians)
Neutral Good: Ornithopods
Chaotic Good: Non-Avialan Maniraptorans (Therizinosaurs, Alvarezsaurs, Oviraptorosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Troodontids)
Lawful Neutral: Non-Averaptoran Averostrans (Ceratosaurs & Megalosaurs)
True Neutral: Non-Maniraptoran Averaptorans (Carnosaurs, Megaraptors, Tyrannosauroids, Compsognathids, Ornithomimosaurs)
Chaotic Neutral: Birds
Lawful Evil: Sauropods
Neutral Evil: Thyreophorans (Stegosaurs & Ankylosaurs)
Chaotic Evil: Basal Forms (Heterodontosaurs, Prosauropods, Herrerasaurs, Coelophysoids)
136 notes · View notes
jurassicsunsets · 8 years ago
Note
any idea from which specific dinosaurs modern birds came to be?
Yes. Birds are neornithines, euornithines, ornithothoracens, pygostylians, avebrevicaudans, euavialans, avialans, averaptorans, paravians, pennaraptors, maniraptors, maniraptoriforms, tyrannoraptors, coelurosaurs, avetheropods, orionodens, tetenurans, averostrans, neotheropods, theropods, and saurischians. Their closest non-avialan relatives are dromaeosaurs and troodontids.
14 notes · View notes
betweenheroesandvillains · 8 years ago
Conversation
Dinosaur Group D&D Alignments
Lawful Good: Marginocephalians (Pachycephalosaurs & Ceratopsians)
Neutral Good: Ornithopods
Chaotic Good: Non-Avialan Maniraptorans (Therizinosaurs, Alvarezsaurs, Oviraptorosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Troodontids)
Lawful Neutral: Non-Averaptoran Averostrans (Ceratosaurs & Megalosaurs)
True Neutral: Non-Maniraptoran Averaptorans (Carnosaurs, Megaraptors, Tyrannosauroids, Compsognathids, Ornithomimosaurs)
Chaotic Neutral: Birds
Lawful Evil: Sauropods
Neutral Evil: Thyreophorans (Stegosaurs & Ankylosaurs)
Chaotic Evil: Basal Forms (Heterodontosaurs, Prosauropods, Herrerasaurs, Coelophysoids)
136 notes · View notes
notsogreathornedowl · 8 years ago
Conversation
Dinosaur Group D&D Alignments
Lawful Good: Marginocephalians (Pachycephalosaurs & Ceratopsians)
Neutral Good: Ornithopods
Chaotic Good: Non-Avialan Maniraptorans (Therizinosaurs, Alvarezsaurs, Oviraptorosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Troodontids)
Lawful Neutral: Non-Averaptoran Averostrans (Ceratosaurs & Megalosaurs)
True Neutral: Non-Maniraptoran Averaptorans (Carnosaurs, Megaraptors, Tyrannosauroids, Compsognathids, Ornithomimosaurs)
Chaotic Neutral: Birds
Lawful Evil: Sauropods
Neutral Evil: Thyreophorans (Stegosaurs & Ankylosaurs)
Chaotic Evil: Basal Forms (Heterodontosaurs, Prosauropods, Herrerasaurs, Coelophysoids)
136 notes · View notes