#Atlanta Web Design Company

[siteitnow]

Learn about Atlanta web design and digital marketing innovation with Site It Now. Discover why it is a hub for cutting-edge trends and insights.

[ztownmedia]

Best Video Marketing Company in Atlanta

Discover the best video marketing company in Atlanta with ZTown Media. Our Creative Concept Development: We start by understanding your target market, brand, and objectives. Then, we develop an original concept that serves as the basis for your video.

[techalice]

Factors to Consider Before Hiring Atlanta web design services

We all recognize the importance of having top Google rankings. However, only a handful people are aware of the way website design could be utilized to boost Google ranking and website effectiveness. This is why hiring a reputable Atlanta web design company will be crucial.

[ai-development-solutions]

Atlanta Website Development Company | Protonshub Technologies

Enhance your online presence with a leading Atlanta Website Development Company. Whether you’re a startup or an established enterprise, partnering with a top-notch web development company in Atlanta can help you to achieve your business goals and boost your online presence. Contact: digital@protonshub.com to know more.

[techsolutions-world]

Web Development Company in Atlanta | Protonshub Technologies

Protonshub Technologies is a leading web development company in Atlanta, specializing in delivering custom web solutions for every size of businesses. Their team of skilled developers and designers leverages the latest technologies to create dynamic, user-friendly, and responsive websites that drive business growth and enhance online presence. Contact: digital@protonshub.com for more information.

[techerasworld]

Website Developers Atlanta | Protonshub Technologies

Find best website developers in Atlanta. Protonshub has expertise in developing, testing and maintaining websites that speak to your brand and deliver results. They help you to build web apps, eCommerce websites, custom web portals etc. Reachout us at: digital@protonshub.com

[seoguruatlantaofficial]

In today’s fast-paced world, having an online presence is essential for any business. A professional and well-designed website can make a huge difference in attracting potential customers and converting them into loyal ones. This is where a professional web design company comes in. A professional web design company in Learn more - https://www.mcdfrork.com/how-a-professional-web-design-company-can-transform-your-online-presence/

[ztownmedia]

Effective Digital Marketing Services In Atlanta

Seeking high-quality digital marketing services in Atlanta? We alleviate common issues like low online visibility and heavy reliance on word-of-mouth referrals with proven tactics that deliver your brand directly to your target audience, increasing exposure and engagement. Visit ZTown Media.

[techsolutionsworld]

Website Development Atlanta | Protonshub Technologies

Protonshub provides website development in Atlanta. They have frontend and backend technologies developers that help in creating user-friendly websites. From designing to development, and maintenance of websites and web applications they provide end to end IT services. Contact: digital@protonshub.com to get the details now!

[technovation]

Atlanta Web Design And Development - Protonshub Technologies

Find one of the best and reliable Web Design And Development company in Atlanta. Protonshub provides all types of website development and designing services, they have team of development that delivers the best in class services.

[thejasonhunterdesign]

How to Optimize Your Webflow Site for Search Engines?

In the world of digital marketing, a well-optimized website is a pivotal asset. For Webflow website designer, understanding how to fine-tune their sites for search engines can be the difference between obscurity and visibility. This blog will delve into the essentials of SEO for Webflow sites, from technical optimization to content strategy, and beyond.

Technical Webflow SEO Optimization

Technical SEO is the backbone of a site's search engine performance. Webflow offers a robust platform that simplifies many technical aspects. To start, ensure that your website is mobile-responsive, as this is a critical ranking factor. Webflow's responsive design capabilities make this easy. Additionally, enhance your site speed by optimizing images and leveraging Webflow's built-in tools to minify CSS and JavaScript. Don't forget to make your URLs SEO-friendly by using clear, descriptive paths and keywords relevant to your page content.

Content Optimization for Webflow Sites

Content is king in the realm of SEO. As a Webflow website designer, your goal should be to produce high-quality, relevant content that resonates with your audience and incorporates your target keywords naturally. Utilize Webflow's CMS features to create blogs or articles that provide value to your readers. Remember to optimize your headers and meta tags with keywords to improve visibility. Engaging, well-written content not only attracts visitors but also encourages them to stay longer, reducing bounce rates and boosting SEO.

Webflow Site Structure for SEO

A well-organized site structure not only enhances user experience but also improves search engine indexing. In Webflow, create a logical hierarchy of pages, ensuring that the most important content is easily accessible. Use breadcrumb navigation and internal linking strategies to guide users and search engines through your site. These practices help in distributing page authority throughout your website, enhancing the SEO performance of individual pages.

SEO-Friendly Webflow Design Tips

The design of your Webflow site plays a crucial role in SEO. Ensure your website is accessible and user-friendly. Use header tags (H1, H2, H3) strategically to structure your content for easy readability. Alt tags for images are essential for SEO and accessibility, providing context to search engines and users who rely on screen readers. Also, pay attention to color contrast and font sizes to ensure your site is accessible to all users.

Off-Page SEO and Link Building for Webflow

Off-page SEO, especially link building, is vital for enhancing your Webflow site's authority. Engage in strategies to acquire high-quality backlinks from reputable websites. This can involve guest blogging, collaborating with influencers, or creating shareable content. Remember, the quality of links is far more important than quantity. Establishing a strong backlink profile will significantly boost your site's credibility and ranking.

Conclusion

Optimizing a Webflow site for search engines is a multifaceted process that involves technical proficiency, content mastery, thoughtful design, and strategic off-page efforts. By focusing on these key areas, website designers can significantly improve site's SEO performance. Remember, SEO is an ongoing process. Continuously monitor your site’s performance, stay updated with the latest SEO trends, and be ready to adapt. With dedication and the right strategies, your Webflow site can achieve remarkable visibility and success in the digital world.

[vappzoro]

What is web application development service?

[atlantadigitalagency]

Atlanta SEO Companies

The Atlanta SEO Companies work to create a faultless marketing strategy for every client. If you feel that your company lacks marketing, you can have the best bet with the SEO services provided by the team of SEO specialists at NEWMEDIA. To know more, get in touch by phone or email .

[seoguruatlantaofficial]

User experience (UX) is a key factor in ensuring your website’s success. An excellent user experience increases user engagement, improves conversions, and boosts search engine rankings. In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the world of digital marketing, including the field of SEO. By leveraging AI SEO tools, you can optimize your website’s UX to meet the ever-changing demands of both users and search engines. This article will explore how AI SEO can elevate your UX and some practical tips to follow. Learn more - https://techntoste.com/how-to-use-ai-seo-to-improve-your-ux-in-2023/

[claire-therose]

The Future of Television: an Introspection

I think we are at a transition point

This story begins in the Los Angeles airport, LAX. Earlier that day, I had a flight scheduled to fly from Burbank to Cincinnati (with a layover in Atlanta) to visit my parents. The flight, unfortunately, was delayed due to weather conditions, so the airline booked me for a or straight flight to CVG. After making my way over to LAX, I noticed the TV near a bar near where I was sitting- and something caught my eye.

An advertisement: for Disney+, Hulu, and Max for $17 with ads, and $30 with ads.

First of all, that's too inexpensive. With previous cable packages exceeding $100 a month, having 3 of the largest and most well known streaming services together in a single deal for less than a third of that previous price is simply unsustainable. My guess – is this deal is introductory pricing to get people used to this bundle as a norm, after which the price can slowly increase without much customer loss.

Secondly, why? Disney and Hulu makes sense, Disney owns Hulu, but Max? Max is owned by WarnerBros. Discovery, one of the largest companies in the video streaming space, and Max itself is a direct competitor to Disney+. What would they have to benefit from cooperation?

Here’s what they have to benefit:

Firstly - some business terms

A knock on the door is heard. Claire opens the door. BYSTANDER enters looking confused. Bystander: I thought this essay was about television? Claire: You thought making television was about making television? Bystander shrugs. Claire: Unfortunately... it's about the money >:3

Economies of scale is an economic principle indicating that the more you produce of something, the less it costs per item to produce. If I want to make 1 copy of The Glass Scientists by Sage Cotugno (a very good graphic novel you should read ( ᵔ ⩊ ᵔ )), it might take me 5-10 hours to print out the pages, bind them together, cut out the cover, glue the whole thing, etc.

If the cost of the materials is, let’s say, $7.00, but it takes 7 hours to make (at $25 an hour, because I’m an expensive bitch (¬‿¬ )) - then it costs this hypothetical company $182 to make this one book. That means you as a consumer would be charged around $200 - very expensive (＞﹏＜).

On the other hand, if I want to make 10,000 copies of this book, and I have $100,000 dollars lying around (as one does), I can buy an industrial book printing machine for $30,000, and even with 30 hours of labor, it still costs:

Labor - 30 hours of work * $25/hr = $750 Materials - $7 per book * 10,000 books = $70,000 Cost of Equipment - $30,000 Total Cost - $100,750 Cost per book - $100,750 / 10,000 books = $10.075

about $10 per book, which, in terms of individual cost, is a huge difference from our first estimate of $182.

Now, to be frank, these numbers are all bogus. I have no idea how much it costs to make a book - but the principle is the same with real numbers.

When your production scales up, your cost per product goes down. Massive corporations don’t build megafactories because they like the aesthetic: they do it because it saves them money.

Now, this makes sense for physical products like books, but it also applies to intangible goods, like software, or web design, or streaming technology infrastructure (ding ding ding).

From a business standpoint it doesn’t make sense for 6 different companies to develop 6 different compression algorithms, and have 6 different interfaces to connect to 6 different data centers to do exactly the same thing: take an uncompressed ISO file, compress it for streaming, and send it to your device.

I personally think this is why we are seeing a lot of corporate consolidation in our current era of streaming – because, from a distributor perspective, it makes sense for all companies in the space to work together - or at least consolidate into a much smaller number of players.

But that’s only one-half of the story:

Seeing these companies merge and bundle was not what originally got me thinking about this whole, media market structure thing.

What got my gears turning was something a lot closer to what I actually care about.

Over the past couple of years, it’s been very disheartening to see many wonderful and amazing series get cut short for seemingly no reason.

I love Inside Job. Shion Takeuchi’s sense of comedy, combined with the fondness and criticalness the show has for Reagan makes her growth feel so authentic! I love seeing what she's doing, when she is in over her head, figuring out what she wants out of life. It’s amazing and funny and incredible.

I love Scavenger’s Reign! Joseph Bennett and Charles Huettner and everyone on the crew do such an amazing job at crafting this eerie fascination for biology. I can totally see the show, and Joseph Bennett’s narrative style, becoming seminal in science fiction later on. Amazing work.

The Owl House! An amazing Disney show created by an amazing person loved dearly by many amazing people. (you can also replace the word amazing with the word gay and it still works! (o^ ^o))

Inside Job wasn't renewed for a season 2 by Netflix. Owl House had its season 3 cut short. Scavenger’s Reign wasn’t renewed by Warner Bros. Discovery, was brought over to Netflix, and then was canceled by Netflix!

To be honest, I don’t know everything about television production. I want to learn and I want to discover but at this point in time I don’t have a clear answer of why these shows were canceled.

Dana Terrace has stated that The Owl House was canceled without her input, which is incredibly disheartening to hear.

Netflix hasn’t made an official statement about the reasons for Inside Job being canceled or Scavenger’s Reign - but I have a theory about what’s going on

Remember when I mentioned economies of scale? Well, there’s an inverse economic principle called diseconomies of scale. Diseconomies of scale indicates that at a certain scale, as production gets larger, the cost per item gets more expensive, rather than less expensive. This can be due to a whole basket of factors, from increasing organizational costs, to transportation and distribution costs, etc. It’s the reason why there isn’t 1 factory that makes all the paper towels in the world. If economies of scale were an absolute rule, that single factory would be the standard, but it’s not. There are certain economic advantages to having multiple smaller factories rather than 1 giant factory (transportation, distribution, etc.).

There are economic reasons for a company to scale up production, but there are also economic reasons for a company to scale down or split production. When companies are at an equilibrium between economies of scale and diseconomies of scale, they are operating at their maximum market efficiency. 

So, how does this apply to streaming companies?

Well, I mentioned before my theory that streaming companies are consolidating due to economies of scale from a distributor perspective, but these companies aren’t just acting as content distributors, they’re also acting as content producers.

Ye Old Media Wisdom Having a single company as a distributor and a producer is a bad idea. -me just now :)

Here’s why:

One of the aspects of diseconomies of scale is the problems with large organization. As a company gets larger, it becomes more and more difficult for people to communicate up and down the ladder and to communicate with different departments across the company. If your company is making something easily measured, like paper towels, your company can be both large and successful (like P&G) because the measurements of what makes a paper towel valuable for the consumer and for the company are easily communicated between teams. If a team is able to make a paper towel 10% more absorbent with a 2% increase in weight, it’s easy to communicate that possible change to a higher up - and their decision, whether to proceed with that change or not, will be made with most of the important details needed for that decision, primarily because those details are easy to communicate.

Making entertainment, especially animated entertainment, is something that is much more complex, subjective, and harder to communicate than paper towels. Different series appeal to different people, different shows have different voices, and being able to communicate the benefits of a series to a friend is challenging, let alone an executive 3 organization levels up. Additionally, making an impactful and amazing series takes risks! All great storytelling is communicating a perspective that is unique and engaging, but to make something unique is by definition to make something new, which requires risk. Larger companies are more risk averse than smaller companies: they have more to lose, are harder to change, and adapt less quickly. For a company whose primary purpose is to make stories that people engage with, being larger is, unfortunately, antithetical to that goal. People who want to make something different deal with more red tape, more bureaucracy, and more people their story has to please. It becomes harder and harder to make something that is new and impactful - to put it another way, it becomes harder to make something successful.

In my opinion, many of the recent releases of Disney feel… generic. Lightyear, Strange World, Wish - these films are by no means made by people without skill or character, but if those people are not allowed to take risks, if they’re not allowed to make anything outside the lowest common denominator of opinions, then the perspective these films convey is destined to be bland and uninteresting.

In my opinion, this is why companies like Riot / Fortiche and Sony Pictures Animation have been kicking ass recently. Spider-Verse, Mitchells and Arcane are amazing and seem to have the support and space they need. Since Riot and Sony Pictures Animation aren’t distributors, they don’t have the same pressure to become a larger company themselves. They can stay the size they want and continue to produce animation at a quality and risk level they are comfortable with.

I don’t know exactly what’s going on inside these companies, there might be other factors that contribute to their success - but I do know that making TV is hard. Making anything at a studio level is hard. Many people have to spend months of their lives working, communicating, and trying to discover what this thing they’re working on is. When people working on these series not only make something, but make something incredible - and after all that, are not be supported?

well, that’s just bad business

Epilogue

So where do we go from here?

Well if I were in charge of the largest media corporations on the planet, I’d say: spin off your animation production companies into their own entities and act, primarily, as the best distributor on the market. This will allow for you to remain as the larger corporate entity you want to be but remove the bureaucratic restrictions on production companies. Additionally, it gives the distributor more choices! Now they don’t only stream your own content, they can stream anyone else’s if they want! If another, better player comes into town, making more popular media, they can stream their shows instead. Production companies get the freedom to make great things, distributors get the structure and size that they need, and consumers, because of the competition between the two, get the best deal for their money.

This is what cable TV was in my opinion: one or 2 big distributors offering the same service, and many smaller production companies making the things we love.

Ideal market structure for media distributors, I think, is 1 or 2 big companies.

Ideal market structure for media producers, however, is many smaller companies.

It will take time, but I think we’ll get to this market structure eventually – or something new might come along, who can say (ᵔ ⩊ ᵔ)

In the meantime, I wish a tremendous amount of support to the artists and individuals who make the animation and series that we all love.

Y’all are why any of this exists in the first place – don’t forget that.

-Claire