#Anker 312

[swift-screen]

Speziell für Samsung-Smartphones: Neue Anker Ace Ladegeräte ab 12,99 Euro erhältlich.

Anker, der Marktführer für mobile Ladelösungen, bringt kurz vor der Präsentation der neuen Samsung Galaxy S23-Generation passendes Zubehör auf den Markt. Die neue Ladegeräte-Serie Ace besteht aus den Modellen Anker 313 (Ace 45 Watt) und Anker 312 (Ace 25 Watt). Das kleinere Modell, das Anker 312, ist ein preiswertes Einsteiger-Netzteil und kostet laut UVP 12,99 Euro. Es lädt Smartphones der…

[technationgr]

ANKER Wall Charger 312 25W USB-C

High charging speed: supports 25 W Samsung super fast charging to fully charge a Galaxy S23 in less than 15 hours

[softrobotcritics]

Mantis Shrimp Robot: the references

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/33/e2026833118

Many small organisms produce ultrafast movements by storing elastic energy and mediating its storage and rapid release through a latching mechanism. The mantis shrimp in particular imparts extreme accelerations on rotating appendages to strike their prey. Biologists have hypothesized, but not tested, that there exists a geometric latching mechanism which mediates the actuation of the appendage. Inspired by the anatomy of the mantis shrimp striking appendage, we develop a centimeter-scale robot which emulates the linkage dynamics in the mantis shrimp and study how the underlying geometric latch is able to control rapid striking motions. Our physical and analytical models could also be extended to other behaviors such as throwing or jumping in which high power over short duration is required.

References

W. Gronenberg, Fast actions in small animals: Springs and click mechanisms. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 178, 727–734 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 A. Galantis, R. C. Woledge, The theoretical limits to the power output of a muscle-tendon complex with inertial and gravitational loads. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 1493–1498 (2003).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, D. M. Dudek, M. V. Rosario, From bouncy legs to poisoned arrows: Elastic movements in invertebrates. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1973–1980 (2011).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 M. Mark Ilton et al., The principles of cascading power limits in small, fast biological and engineered systems. Science 360, eaao1082 (2018).Google Scholar

 S. J. Longo et al., Beyond power amplification: Latch-mediated spring actuation is an emerging framework for the study of diverse elastic systems. J. Exp. Biol. 222, 1–10 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 S. Vogel, Living in a physical world II. The bio-ballistics of small projectiles. J. Biosci. 30, 167–175 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 S. Vogel, Living in a physical world III. Getting up to speed. J. Biosci. 30, 303–312 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 A. Sakes et al., Shooting mechanisms in nature: A systematic review. PLoS One 11, e0158277 (2016).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 M. V. Rosario, G. P. Sutton, S. N. Patek, G. S. Sawicki, Muscle–spring dynamics in time-limited, elastic movements. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 283, 20161561 (2016).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 S. M. Mark Ilton et al., The effect of size-scale on the kinematics of elastic energy release. Soft Matter 15, 9579–9586 (2019).Google Scholar

 P. Gregory et al., Why do large animals never actuate their jumps with latch-mediated springs? Because they can jump higher without them. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 1609–1618 (2019).Google Scholar

 O. Bolmin et al., Latching of the click beetle (Coleoptera: Elateridae) thoracic hinge enabled by the morphology and mechanics of conformal structures. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb196683 (2019).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 S. Divi, X. Ma et al., Latch-based control of energy output in spring actuated systems. J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200070 (2020).Google Scholar

 B. Webb, Using robots to model animals: A cricket test. Robot. Auton. Syst. 16, 117–134 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 K. Dianna et al., Addressing grand challenges in organismal biology: The need for synthesis. Bioscience 64, 1178–1187 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 D. L. Hu, M. Prakash, B. Chan, J. W. M. Bush, Water-walking devices. Exp. Fluids 43, 769–778 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 R. Altendorfer et al., Rhex: A biologically inspired hexapod runner. Auton. Robots 11, 207–213 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 F. Berlinger, J. Dusek, M. Gauci, R. Nagpal, Robust maneuverability of a miniature, low-cost underwater robot using multiple fin actuation. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3, 140–147 (2017).Google Scholar

 M. J. McHenry et al., The comparative hydrodynamics of rapid rotation by predatory appendages. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 3399–3411 (2016).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, W. L. Korff, R. L. Caldwell, Biomechanics: Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp. Nature 428, 819–820 (2004).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, R. L. Caldwell, Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: Strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3655–3664 (2005).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 R. L. Crane, S. M. Cox, S. A. Kisare, S. N. Patek, Smashing mantis shrimp strategically impact shells. J. Exp. Biol. 221, jeb176099 (2018).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 T. I. Zack, T. Claverie, S. N. Patek, Elastic energy storage in the mantis shrimp’s fast predatory strike. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 4002–4009 (2009).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, M. V. Rosario, J. R. A. Taylor, Comparative spring mechanics in mantis shrimp. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 1317–1329 (2013).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 M. V. Rosario, S. N. Patek, Multilevel analysis of elastic morphology: The mantis shrimp’s spring. J. Morphol. 276, 1123–1135 (2015).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 M. Tadayon, S. Amini, A. Masic, A. Miserez, The mantis shrimp saddle: A biological spring combining stiffness and flexibility. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 6437–6447 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. Tadayon, S. Amini, Z. Wang, A. Miserez, Biomechanical design of the mantis shrimp saddle: A biomineralized spring used for rapid raptorial strikes. iScience 8, 271–282 (2018).Google Scholar

 S. N. Patek, B. N. Nowroozi, J. E. Baio, R. L. Caldwell, A. P. Summers, Linkage mechanics and power amplification of the mantis shrimp’s strike. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 3677–3688 (2007).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 M. J. McHenry, T. Claverie, M. V. Rosario, S. N. Patek, Gearing for speed slows the predatory strike of a mantis shrimp. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1231–1245 (2012).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 M. Burrows, The mechanics and neural control of the prey capture strike in the mantid shrimps squilla and hemisquilla. Z. Vgl. Physiol. 62, 361–381 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. Burrows, G. Hoyle, Neuromuscular physiology of the strike mechanism of the mantis shrimp, hemisquilla. J. Exp. Zool. 179, 379–393 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. S. deVries, E. A. K. Murphy, S. N. Patek, Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: The spearing mantis shrimp. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 4374–4384 (2012).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 K. Kagaya, S. N. Patek, Feed-forward motor control of ultrafast, ballistic movements. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 319–333 (2016).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, The power of mantis shrimp strikes: Interdisciplinary impacts of an extreme cascade of energy release. Integr. Comp. Biol. 59, 1573–1585 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 S. M. Cox, D. Schmidt, Y. Modarres-Sadeghi, S. N. Patek, A physical model of the extreme mantis shrimp strike: Kinematics and cavitation of Ninjabot. Bioinspir. Biomim. 9, 016014 (2014).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 S. J. Longo, T. Goodearly, P. C. Wainwright. Extremely fast feeding strikes are powered by elastic recoil in a seahorse relative, the snipefish, Macroramphosus scolopax. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 285, 20181078 (2018).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 D. Cofer, G. Cymbalyuk, W. J. Heitler, D. H. Edwards, Neuromechanical simulation of the locust jump. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 1060–1068 (2010).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 T. Kaji, A. Anker, C. S. Wirkner, A. R. Palmer, Parallel saltational evolution of ultrafast movements in snapping shrimp claws. Curr. Biol. 28, 106–113.e4 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 S. N. Patek, S. J. Longo, Evolutionary biomechanics: The pathway to power in snapping shrimp. Curr. Biol. 28, R115–R117 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 J. A. C. Knowles, M. H. Lowenberg, S. A. Neild, B. Krauskopf, A bifurcation study to guide the design of a landing gear with a combined uplock/downlock mechanism. Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 470, 20140332 (2014).Google Scholar

 J. A. C. Knowles, B. Krauskopf, M. H. Lowenberg, Numerical continuation applied to landing gear mechanism analysis. J. Aircr. 48, 1254–1262 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 H. C. Bennet-Clark, E. C. A. Lucey, The jump of the flea: A study of the energetics and a model of the mechanism. J. Exp. Biol. 47, 59–67 (1967).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 M. Noh, S.-W. Kim, S. An, J.-S. Koh, K.-J. Cho, Flea-inspired catapult mechanism for miniature jumping robots. IEEE Trans. Robot. 28, 1007–1018 (2012).Google Scholar

 J.-S. Koh et al., Jumping on water: Surface tension–dominated jumping of water striders and robotic insects. Science 349, 517–521 (2015).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 J.-S. Koh, J. Sun-pil, R. J. Wood, K.-J. Cho. “A jumping robotic insect based on a torque reversal catapult mechanism” in 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IEEE, 2013), pp. 3796–3801.Google Scholar

 P. S. L. Anderson, T. Claverie, S. N. Patek, Levers and linkages: Mechanical trade-offs in a power-amplified system. Evolution 68, 1919–1933 (2014).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 P. S. L. Anderson, S. N. Patek, Mechanical sensitivity reveals evolutionary dynamics of mechanical systems. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20143088 (2015).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 Y. Hu, N. Nelson-Maney, P. S. L. Anderson, Common evolutionary trends underlie the four-bar linkage systems of sunfish and mantis shrimp. Evolution 71, 1397–1405 (2017).Google Scholar

 M. M. Munoz, P. S. L. Anderson, S. N. Patek, Mechanical sensitivity and the dynamics of evolutionary rate shifts in biomechanical systems. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 284, 20162325 (2017).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 M. Muller, Optimization principles applied to the mechanism of neurocranium levation and mouth bottom depression in bony fishes (halecostomi). J. Theor. Biol. 126, 343–368 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. W. Westneat, Feeding mechanics of teleost fishes (Labridae; Perciformes): A test of four-bar linkage models. J. Morphol. 205, 269–295 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. W. Westneat, Transmission of force and velocity in the feeding mechanisms of labrid fishes (teleostei, perciformes). Zoomorphology 114, 103–118 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 M. Burrows, O. Morris, Jumping and kicking in bush crickets. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 1035–1049 (2003).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 T. J. Roberts, E. Azizi, Flexible mechanisms: The diverse roles of biological springs in vertebrate movement. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 353–361 (2011).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 R. M. Murray, Z. Li, S. Sastry, A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation (CRC Press, 2017).Google Scholar

 J. P. Whitney, P. S. Sreetharan, K. Y. Ma, R. J. Wood, Pop-up book mems. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21, 115021 (2011).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 P. S. Sreetharan, J. P. Whitney, M. D. Strauss, R. J. Wood, Monolithic fabrication of millimeter-scale machines. J. Micromech. Microeng. 22, 055027 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

 J. M. Birch, M. H. Dickinson, Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature 412, 729–733 (2001).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 C. Li, S. T. Hsieh, D. I. Goldman, Multi-functional foot use during running in the zebra-tailed lizard (Callisaurus draconoides). J. Exp. Biol. 215, 3293–3308 (2012).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 D. P. Holmes, A. J. Crosby, Snapping surfaces. Adv. Mater. 19, 3589–3593 (2007).Google Scholar

 H. C. Astley, T. J. Roberts, Evidence for a vertebrate catapult: Elastic energy storage in the plantaris tendon during frog jumping. Biol. Lett. 8, 386–389 (2012).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 H. C. Astley, T. J. Roberts, The mechanics of elastic loading and recoil in anuran jumping. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 4372–4378 (2014).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 F. J. Larabee, A. V. Suarez, The evolution and functional morphology of trap-jaw ants (hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 20, 25–36 (2014).Google Scholar

 R. Ritzmann, Snapping behavior of the shrimp Alpheus californiensis. Science 181, 459–460 (1973).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 E. R. Ritzmann, Mechanisms for the snapping behavior of two alpheid shrimp, Alpheus californiensis and Alpheus heterochelis. J. Comp. Physiol. 95, 217–236 (1974).Google Scholar

 A. M. Olsen, A mobility-based classification of closed kinematic chains in biomechanics and implications for motor control. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb195735 (2019).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 A. M. Olsen, A. L. Camp, E. L. Brainerd, The opercular mouth-opening mechanism of largemouth bass functions as a 3d four-bar linkage with three degrees of freedom. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 4612–4623 (2017).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 N. J. Cowan et al., Feedback control as a framework for understanding tradeoffs in biology. Integr. Comp. Biol. 54, 223–237 (2014).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

 J.-S. Koh, S.-P. Jung, M. Noh, S.-W. Kim, K.-J. Cho, “Flea inspired catapult mechanism with active energy storage and release for small scale jumping robot ” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE, 2013), pp. 26–31.Google Scholar

 G. P. Sutton, M. Burrows, Biomechanics of jumping in the flea. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 836–847 (2011).Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar

 T. Ayling, Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand (William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand, 1982).Google Scholar

 P. A. Green, S. N. Patek, Contests with deadly weapons: Telson sparring in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda). Biol. Lett. 11, 20150558 (2015).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

[linhgd9]

May 2021 Global Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market Report 2021 Key Players CARKU, China AGA, Anker, BOLTPOWER, Shenzhen NianLun Electronic

Report is a detailed study of the Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market, which covers all the essential information required by a new market entrant as well as the existing players to gain a deeper understanding of the market.The primary objective of this research report named Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market is to help making reliable strategic decisions regarding the opportunities in Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market. It offers business accounts, industry investors, and industry segments with consequential insights enhancing decision making ability.nicolas.shaw@cognitivemarketresearch.com or call us on +1-312-376-8303.

Request Report from CMR Website:https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/energy-%26-power/lithium-manganese-dioxide-batteries-market-report

Global and Regional Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market Segmentation by Type: 200W

Global Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market Segmentation by Applications: Automotive, Motocycle, Other

Major Market Players with an in-depth analysis: CARKU, China AGA, Anker, BOLTPOWER, Shenzhen NianLun Electronic, Newsmy, COBRA, Stanley Black & Decker Inc, Clore Automotive

Request Free Sample Copy of Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market Research Report@ https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/energy-%26-power/lithium-manganese-dioxide-batteries-market-report#download_report

The Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market report offers the current state of the market around the world. The report starts with the market outline and key components of the Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market which assumes a significant job for clients to settle on the business choice. It additionally offers the key focuses to upgrade the development in the Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market. Some fundamental ideas are likewise secured by reports, for example, item definition, its application, industry esteem chain structure and division which help the client to break down the market without any problem. Also, the report covers different factors, for example, arrangements, efficient and innovative which are affecting the Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries business and market elements.

Any query? Enquire Here For Discount (COVID-19 Impact Analysis Updated Sample): Click Here—> Download Sample Report of Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market Report 2020 (Coronavirus Impact Analysis on Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Market)

The research comprises primary information about the products. Similarly, it includes supply-demand statistics, and segments that constrain the growth of an industry. It also includes raw materials used and manufacturing process of Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market. Additionally, report provides market drivers and challenges & opportunities for overall market in the particular provincial sections.

Competitive Analysis has been done to understand overall market which will be helpful to take decisions. Major players involved in the manufacture of Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries product has been completely profiled along with their SWOT. Some of the key players include CARKU, China AGA, Anker, BOLTPOWER, Shenzhen NianLun Electronic, Newsmy, COBRA, Stanley Black & Decker Inc, Clore Automotive. It helps in understanding their strategy and activities. Business strategy described for every company helps to get idea about the current trends of company. The industry intelligence study of the Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries market covers the estimation size of the market each in phrases of value (Mn/Bn USD) and volume (tons). Report involves detailed chapter on COVID 19 and its impact on this market. Additionally, it involves changing consumer behavior due to outbreak of COVID 19.

Further, report consists of Porter’s Five Forces and BCG matrix as well as product life cycle to help you in taking wise decisions. Additionally, this report covers the inside and out factual examination and the market elements and requests which give an entire situation of the business.

Regional Analysis for Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries • North America (United States, Canada) • Europe (Germany, Spain, France, UK, Russia, and Italy) • Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, India, Australia, and South Korea) • Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, etc.) • The Middle East and Africa (GCC and South Africa)

DOWNLOAD FREE SAMPLE REPORT@: https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/energy-%26-power/lithium-manganese-dioxide-batteries-market-report#download_report

Chapters Define in TOC (Table of Content) of the Report: Chapter 1: Market Overview, Drivers, Restraints and Opportunities, Segmentation Overview Chapter 2: COVID Impact Chapter 3: Market Competition by Manufacturers Chapter 4: Production by Regions Chapter 5: Consumption by Regions Chapter 6: Production, By Types, Revenue and Market share by Types Chapter 7: Consumption, By Applications, Market share (%) and Growth Rate by Applications Chapter 8: Complete profiling and analysis of Manufacturers Chapter 9: Manufacturing cost analysis, Raw materials analysis, Region-wise Manufacturing expenses Chapter 10: Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers Chapter 11: Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders Chapter 12: Market Effect Factors Analysis Chapter 13: Market Forecast Chapter 14: Lithium Manganese Dioxide Batteries Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source To check the complete Table of Content click here: @ https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/energy-%26-power/lithium-manganese-dioxide-batteries-market-report#table_of_contents

The qualitative contents for geographical analysis will cover market trends in each region and country which includes highlights of the key players operating in the respective region/country, PEST analysis of each region which includes political, economic, social and technological factors influencing the growth of the market. The research report includes specific segments by Type and by Application. This study provides information about the sales and revenue during the historic and forecasted period of 2015 to 2027.

About Us: Cognitive Market Research is one of the finest and most efficient Market Research and Consulting firm. The company strives to provide research studies which include syndicate research, customized research, round the clock assistance service, monthly subscription services, and consulting services to our clients.

Contact Us: +1-312-376-8303 Email: nicolas.shaw@cognitivemarketresearch.com Web: https://ift.tt/2TZnzf4

**********Download the Entire Report************************************************* https://cognitivemarketresearch.com/energy-%26-power/lithium-manganese-dioxide-batteries-market-report

from NeighborWebSJ https://ift.tt/3oiMKay via IFTTT

from WordPress https://ift.tt/3fySA3N via IFTTT

[reporthiveseo-blog]

Global Solar Charger Market Professional Survey Report 2017

The Global Solar Charger Industry report contains a complete product overview and its scope in the market to define the key terms and provide the clients a holistic idea of the market and its tendencies. This is followed by the classification, applications, and the regional analysis of the market to ensure the clients are well informed about each section. The report also contains key values and facts of the Global Solar Charger Market in terms of value and volume, sales and its growth rate, and revenue and its growth rate.

In this report, the global Solar Charger market is valued at USD XX million in 2016 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022.

Request a report sample@ https://www.reporthive.com/enquiry.php?id=1128439&req_type=smpl

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue (million USD), market share and growth rate of Solar Charger in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast), covering

United States

EU

China

Japan

South Korea

Taiwan

Global Solar Charger market competition by top manufacturers, with production, price, revenue (value) and market share for each manufacturer; the top players including

Anker

GoalZero

Letsolar

RAVPower

ECEEN

Powertraveller

Solio

LittleSun

Voltaic Systems

YOLK

Solar Technology International

NOCO

Instapark

Xtorm

Allpowers Industrial International

Hanergy

On the basis of product, this report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into

Below 5 Wattage

5 Wattage to 10 Wattage

10 Wattage to 20 Wattage

Above 20 Wattage

On the basis of the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including

Portable Consumer Electronics

Automotive

Other

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Make Enquiry for Discount@ https://www.reporthive.com/enquiry.php?id=1128439&req_type=disc

Some Points from Table of Content

Global Solar Charger Market Research Report 2017

1 Solar Charger Market Overview

1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Solar Charger

1.2 Solar Charger Segment by Type (Product Category)

1.2.1 Global Solar Charger Production and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (Product Category)(2012-2022)

1.2.2 Global Solar Charger Production Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016

1.2.3 Below 5 Wattage

1.2.4 5 Wattage to 10 Wattage

1.2.5 10 Wattage to 20 Wattage

1.2.6 Above 20 Wattage

1.3 Global Solar Charger Segment by Application

1.3.1 Solar Charger Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2012-2022)

1.3.2 Portable Consumer Electronics

1.3.3 Automotive

1.3.4 Other

1.4 Global Solar Charger Market by Region (2012-2022)

1.4.1 Global Solar Charger Market Size (Value) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2012-2022)

1.4.2 United States Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.4.3 EU Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.4.4 China Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.4.5 Japan Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.4.6 South Korea Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.4.7 Taiwan Status and Prospect (2012-2022)

1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Solar Charger (2012-2022)

1.5.1 Global Solar Charger Revenue Status and Outlook (2012-2022)

1.5.2 Global Solar Charger Capacity, Production Status and Outlook (2012-2022)

2 Global Solar Charger Market Competition by Manufacturers

2.1 Global Solar Charger Capacity, Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017)

2.1.1 Global Solar Charger Capacity and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017)

2.1.2 Global Solar Charger Production and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017)

2.2 Global Solar Charger Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2012-2017)

2.3 Global Solar Charger Average Price by Manufacturers (2012-2017)

2.4 Manufacturers Solar Charger Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type

2.5 Solar Charger Market Competitive Situation and Trends

2.5.1 Solar Charger Market Concentration Rate

2.5.2 Solar Charger Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers

2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Global Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2017)

3.1 Global Solar Charger Capacity and Market Share by Region (2012-2017)

3.2 Global Solar Charger Production and Market Share by Region (2012-2017)

3.3 Global Solar Charger Revenue (Value) and Market Share by Region (2012-2017)

3.4 Global Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.5 United States Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.6 EU Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.7 China Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.8 Japan Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.9 South Korea Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

3.10 Taiwan Solar Charger Capacity, Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2012-2017)

4 Global Solar Charger Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region (2012-2017)

4.1 Global Solar Charger Consumption by Region (2012-2017)

4.2 United States Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

4.3 EU Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

4.4 China Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

4.5 Japan Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

4.6 South Korea Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

4.7 Taiwan Solar Charger Production, Consumption, Export, Import (2012-2017)

5 Global Solar Charger Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type

5.1 Global Solar Charger Production and Market Share by Type (2012-2017)

5.2 Global Solar Charger Revenue and Market Share by Type (2012-2017)

5.3 Global Solar Charger Price by Type (2012-2017)

5.4 Global Solar Charger Production Growth by Type (2012-2017)

Contact Us

Mike Ross

Marketing Manager

mike.ross@reporthive.com

http://www.reporthive.com

Phone: +1 312-604-7084

Sainath Nagar, Vadgaon Sheri,

Pune, Maharashtra 411014

India.

[kelsusit]

The best laptop docking stations 2017

Finding the best laptop docking station for your needs can make working on your laptop easier, more convenient and more comfortable, as while laptops are great for portability, they don't quite offer the range of connectivity options desktop PCs provide in the office.

However, with docking stations, you can have the best of both worlds: a portable laptop that has the connectivity of a more bulky desktop PC.

This means that you’re able to chuck your laptop in a bag for meetings or when travelling, and then easily connect it up to a dock to turn it into a desktop computer setup back at the office (or indeed at home). That way, you can easily link the notebook to a monitor, keyboard, mouse, printer and so forth.

Searching for the best docking station isn’t easy, though. There are so many to choose from, serving different laptops and purposes. In this feature, we’re going to look at the best models that’ll give you everything you need to stay productive and to turn your trusted laptop into a fully-featured work machine.

You might also be interested in these 5 productivity gadgets that your laptop will love

StarTech claims its Thunderbolt 3 docking station is the most advanced dock ever. Often, docking stations require multiple leads, but StarTech’s latest offering avoids that. The device has been designed to work with thinner notebooks and uses only one cord. 

As the name suggests, it supports dual 4K displays (at 60Hz) and harnesses the raw power of Thunderbolt 3, offering 40Gbps bandwidth while keeping portability in mind. That’s not all, though. It can be used with up to three USB 3.0 devices and you also get Gigabit Ethernet capability. There’s also the ability to charge mobile devices, and you benefit from Direct DisplayPort integration. This accessory will set you back £312, which is a hefty whack, but not a bad investment if you’re in the market for a powerful dock.

Buy the StarTech Thunderbolt 3 Docking Station here

Targus offers this Dual Video Docking Station which won’t break the bank, and comes with integrated laptop recharging facilities that are compatible with most 90W notebooks. So even if you’ve forgotten your charger, you’ll be good to go with this nifty device.

You can hook up two displays to this dock, and in terms of ports, you get a pair of USB 3.0 ports, alongside a pair of USB 2.0 connectors, plus two powered USB 2.0 ports, and Gigabit Ethernet. Targus also offers a Multiplexer Adaptor which makes this docking station USB-C compatible.

Buy the Targus USB 3.0 Dual Video Docking Station here

Anker also makes a range of affordable laptop docking stations – and its USB 3.0 dual display model is one of them. You can connect up all your peripherals via six USB ports, and use two displays simultaneously. That’s certainly handy if you need multiple displays for work purposes. 

Four of the USB ports are version 2.0, while two are USB 3.0 – and they give you access to transfer speeds of 5Gbps. The dock has built-in automatic bandwidth prioritisation too, aiming for smooth, stable performance when all the ports are being used. This dock has been built for Windows devices.

Buy the Anker USB 3.0 Docking Station here

Kensington is a well-known and respected brand which has developed a reputation for its docking stations. Its latest USB 3.0 model can be used with MacBook or Windows laptops. 

The device lets you turn one USB port into six (it sports four USB 2.0 ports around the back, and a pair of USB 3.0 affairs on the front). You also get a DVI connector and adapters to use it with either HDMI or VGA leads, and there’s an optional multi-display adapter for hooking up more than one monitor. You also get an Ethernet port.

The dock will sit next to your laptop nicely and is placed in the midrange bracket in terms of pricing.

Buy the Kensington USB 3.0 Docking Station here

Toshiba is another big tech name that makes laptop docking stations. The Dynadock V3.0 is one of the firm’s most popular offerings, and is targeted at Windows laptop users who want to benefit from expanded capabilities.

Like most docking stations nowadays, the Dynadock offers USB 3.0 ports, although more than many as you get four of these here. There is also a DVI connector (with adapters for HDMI or VGA) along with an Ethernet port, and the dock uses one cable connection for ease-of-use and portability. And because the Dynadock sports an upright design, it’ll fit nicely on even the most cramped desk environment.

Buy the Toshiba Dynadock V3.0+ here

Microsoft is a company known primarily for its software prowess, but in recent years, it has been increasingly working on the hardware front. The Surface line-up of tablet hybrids demonstrates this perfectly. If you own one, you’ll be happy to learn that you can also reap the rewards offered by a docking station.

The Surface Dock will let you turn your Surface convertible into a fully-fledged desktop PC. It’s compatible with the Surface Pro 3, Surface Pro 4 and Surface Book. Connectivity-wise, there are two Mini DisplayPorts, one Gigabit Ethernet port, four USB 3.0 ports and an audio-out jack. This dock doesn’t come particularly cheap, though.

Buy the Microsoft Surface Dock here

The J5Create Ultra Station is a neat and compact dock indeed, being a thin bar which you can attach to the back of your notebook. It provides a variety of connectivity options for Windows laptops and MacBooks: you get a pair of USB 3.0 ports (one of which has power for charging) and a USB 2.0 port, along with VGA and HDMI ports, Ethernet, plus speaker and mic jacks.

However, that’s not all. There’s also a nifty ‘wormhole’ USB connection that allows you to hook up another computer – as well as your initial laptop – and do things like share files by simply dragging and dropping them across from machine to machine. This can also be used to share your keyboard and mouse between devices, and works cross-platform (i.e. you can hook up and share things between a Windows notebook and MacBook).

Buy the J5Create JUD500 Ultra Station here

Although there are universal laptop docking stations out there, of course, many models are built by manufacturers for their own notebooks. Dell’s USB 3.0 dock exemplifies this. It works with most of the company’s latest laptops in the Inspiron series and, like much of the competition, uses USB 3.0 as the prevalent port – it has three USB 3.0 connectors, along with two USB 2.0 ports.

As the name suggests, 4K screens are catered for, and you get a DisplayPort along with a pair of HDMI ports, meaning you can hook up a total of three external monitors (one of them 4K) if you wish. Dell bundles an HDMI to DVI adapter, to support older displays still using DVI, and this dock also boasts an Ethernet port along with audio/headphone jacks.

Buy the Dell USB 3.0 Triple Video Docking Station here

for http://kelsusit.com

[naivelocus]

Chemically imaging bacteria with super-resolution SERS on ultra-thin silver substrates

1.

Hell, S. W. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316, 1153–1158 (2007).

2.

Gustafsson, M. G. Extended resolution fluorescence microscopy. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 9, 627–628 (1999).

3.

Betzig, E., Trautman, J., Harris, T., Weiner, J. & Kostelak, R. Breaking the diffraction barrier: optical microscopy on a nanometric scale. Science 251, 1468–1470 (1991).

4.

Hell, S. W. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nature Biotechnology 21, 1347–1355 (2003).

5.

Gustafsson, M. G. L. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 198, 82–87 (2000).

6.

Wicker, K. & Heintzmann, R. Resolving a misconception about structured illumination. Nature Photonics 8, 342–344 (2014).

7.

Wang, P. et al. Far-field imaging of non-fluorescent species with subdiffraction resolution. Nature Photonics 7, 449–453 (2013).

8.

Cotte, Y. et al. Marker-free phase nanoscopy. Nature Photonics 7, 113–117 (2013).

9.

Jünger, F., Olshausen, P. v. & Rohrbach, A. Fast, label-free super-resolution live-cell imaging using rotating coherent scattering (ROCS) microscopy. Scientific Reports 6 (2016).

10.

Sentenac, A., Chaumet, P. C. & Belkebir, K. Beyond the Rayleigh criterion: grating assisted far-field optical diffraction tomography. Physical Review Letters 97, 243901 (2006).

11.

Girard, J. et al. Far-field optical control of a movable subdiffraction light grid. Physical Review Letters 109, 187404 (2012).

12.

Barnes, W. L., Dereux, A. & Ebbesen, T. W. Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424, 824 (2003).

13.

Polman, A. Plasmonics Applied. Science 322, 868 (2008).

14.

Ozbay, E. Plasmonics: Merging photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions. Science 311, 189 (2006).

15.

Balzarotti, F. & Stefani, F. D. Plasmonics meets far-field optical nanoscopy. ACS Nano 6, 4580–4584 (2012).

16.

Brolo, A. G. Plasmonics for future biosensors. Nature Photonics 6, 709–713 (2012).

17.

Anker, J. N. et al. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nature Materials 7, 442 (2008).

18.

Gordon, R., Sinton, D., Kavanagh, K. L. & Brolo, A. G. A new generation of sensors based on extraordinary optical transmission. Accounts of Chemical Research 41, 1049 (2008).

19.

Seiler, S. T., Rich, I. S. & Lindquist, N. C. Direct spectral imaging of plasmonic nanohole arrays for real-time sensing. Nanotechnology 27, 184001 (2016).

20.

Stiles, P. L., Dieringer, J. A., Shah, N. C. & Van Duyne, R. P. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 1, 601 (2008).

21.

Stranahan, S. M. & Willets, K. A. & others. Super-resolution optical imaging of single-molecule SERS hot spots. Nano Letters 10, 3777–3784 (2010).

22.

Brolo, A. G., Arctander, E., Gordon, R., Leathem, B. & Kavanagh, K. L. Nanohole-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Nano Letters 4, 2015 (2004).

23.

Lesuffleur, A., Kumar, L. K. S., Brolo, A. G., Kavanagh, K. L. & Gordon, R. Apex-enhanced Raman spectroscopy using double-hole arrays in a gold film. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111, 2347 (2007).

24.

Bantz, K. C. et al. Recent progress in SERS biosensing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 11551–11567 (2011).

25.

Lindquist, N. C. et al. Tip-Based Plasmonics: Squeezing Light with Metallic Nanoprobes. Laser and Photonics Review 7, 453 (2013).

26.

Juan, M. L., Righini, M. & Quidant, R. Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nature Photonics 5, 349 (2011).

27.

Righini, M., Zelenina, A., Girard, C. & Quidant, R. Parallel and selective trapping in a patterned plasmonic landscape. Nature Physics 3, 477 (2007).

28.

Weber, M. L. & Willets, K. A. Correlated Super-Resolution Optical and Structural Studies of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Hot Spots in Silver Colloid Aggregates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2, 1766–1770 (2011).

29.

Cang, H. et al. Probing the electromagnetic field of a 15-nanometre hotspot by single molecule imaging. Nature 469, 385–388 (2011).

30.

Ayas, S. et al. Label-Free Nanometer-Resolution Imaging of Biological Architectures through Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering. Scientific Reports 3, 2624 (2013).

31.

Willets, K. A. Super-resolution imaging of SERS hot spots. Chemical Society Reviews 43, 3854–3864 (2014).

32.

Jarvis, R. M., Brooker, A. & Goodacre, R. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering for the rapid discrimination of bacteria. Faraday Discussions 132, 281–292 (2006).

33.

Lin, D. et al. Label-free blood plasma test based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering for tumor stages detection in nasopharyngeal cancer. Scientific Reports 4, 4751 (2014).

34.

Zhou, H. et al. Label-free in situ discrimination of live and dead bacteria by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Analytical Chemistry 87, 6553–6561 (2015).

35.

Radziuk, D. & Moehwald, H. Prospects for plasmonic hot spots in single molecule SERS towards the chemical imaging of live cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 17, 21072–21093 (2015).

36.

Wolter, S. et al. rapidSTORM: accurate, fast open-source software for localization microscopy. Nature Methods 9, 1040–1041 (2012).

37.

Nie, S. & Emory, S. R. Probing single molecules and single nanoparticles by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Science 275, 1102–1106 (1997).

38.

Kneipp, K. et al. Single molecule detection using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Physical Review Letters 78, 1667 (1997).

39.

Wang, Z. & Rothberg, L. J. Origins of blinking in single-molecule Raman spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109, 3387–3391 (2005).

40.

Efrima, S. & Zeiri, L. Understanding SERS of bacteria. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 40, 277–288 (2009).

41.

Kahraman, M., Keseroglu, K. & Culha, M. On sample preparation for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of bacteria and the source of spectral features of the spectra. Applied Spectroscopy 65, 500–506 (2011).

42.

Premasiri, W. R., Gebregziabher, Y. & Ziegler, L. D. On the difference between surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of cell growth media and whole bacterial cells. Applied Spectroscopy 65, 493–499 (2011).

43.

Kahraman, M., Yazici, M. M., Sahin, F. & Culha, M. Experimental parameters influencing surface-enhanced Raman scattering of bacteria. Journal of Biomedical Optics 12, 054015–054015 (2007).

44.

Jarvis, R. M. & Goodacre, R. Discrimination of bacteria using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,. Analytical Chemistry 76, 40–47 (2004).

45.

Su, L., Zhang, P., Zheng, D.-w. & Zhong, R.-g. 7 others. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Optoelectronics Letters 11, 157–160 (2015).

46.

Xiao, N., Wang, C. & Yu, C. A self-referencing detection of microorganisms using surface enhanced Raman scattering nanoprobes in a test-in-a-tube platform. Biosensors 3, 312–326 (2013).

47.

Jarvis, R. M. & Goodacre, R. Characterisation and identification of bacteria using SERS. Chemical Society Reviews 37, 931–936 (2008).

48.

Culha, M. et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of bacteria in microwells constructed from silver nanoparticles. Journal of Nanotechnology 2012 (2012).

49.

Zhou, H. et al. SERS detection of bacteria in water by in situ coating with Ag nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry 86, 1525–1533 (2014).

50.

Paret, M. L., Sharma, S. K., Green, L. M. & Alvarez, A. M. Biochemical characterization of Gram-positive and Gram-negative plant-associated bacteria with micro-Raman spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy 64, 433–441 (2010).

51.

Prucek, R. et al. Reproducible discrimination between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy with infrared excitation. Analyst 137, 2866–2870 (2012).

52.

Berezin, S., Aviv, Y., Aviv, H., Goldberg, E. & Tischler, Y. R. Replacing a Century Old Technique-Modern Spectroscopy Can Supplant Gram Staining. Scientific Reports 7, 3810 (2017).

53.

Ertsgaard, C. T., McKoskey, R. M., Rich, I. S. & Lindquist, N. C. Dynamic placement of plasmonic hotspots for super-resolution surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano 8, 10941–10946 (2014).

54.

Olson, A. P., Ertsgaard, C. T., Elliott, S. N. & Lindquist, N. C. Super Resolution Chemical Imaging with Plasmonic Substrates. ACS Photonics 3, 329 (2016).

55.

Sun, H., Yu, M., Wang, G., Sun, X. & Lian, J. Temperature-dependent morphology evolution and surface plasmon absorption of ultrathin gold island films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116, 9000–9008 (2012).

56.

Lindquist, N. C., Johnson, T. W., Jose, J., Otto, L. M. & Oh, S. H. Ultrasmooth metallic films with buried nanostructures for backside reflection-mode plasmonic biosensing. Annalen der Physik 524, 687 (2012).

57.

Raman Data and Analysis (Horiba), http://www.horiba.com/fileadmin/uploads/Scientific/Documents/Raman/bands.pdf, Website URL, (Last accessed March 2017).

58.

Mrozek, M. F. & Weaver, M. J. Detection and identification of aqueous saccharides by using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry 74, 4069–4075 (2002).

59.

de Siqueira e Oliveira, F. S., Giana, H. E. & Silveira, L. Jr. Discrimination of selected species of pathogenic bacteria using near-infrared Raman spectroscopy and principal components analysis. Journal of Biomedical Optics 17, 107004–107004 (2012).

60.

Sleytr, U. B. I. Basic and applied S-layer research: an overview. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 20, 5–12 (1997).

61.

Wu, X., Huang, Y.-W., Park, B., Tripp, R. A. & Zhao, Y. Differentiation and classification of bacteria using vancomycin functionalized silver nanorods array based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and chemometric analysis. Talanta 139, 96–103 (2015).

62.

Xie, Y. et al. Label-free detection of the foodborne pathogens of Enterobacteriaceae by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analytical Methods 5, 946–952 (2013).

63.

Wu, X., Xu, C., Tripp, R. A., Huang, Y.-w. & Zhao, Y. Detection and differentiation of foodborne pathogenic bacteria in mung bean sprouts using field deployable label-free SERS devices. Analyst 138, 3005–3012 (2013).

64.

Meisel, S. et al. Raman spectroscopy as a potential tool for detection of Brucella spp. in milk. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, 5575–5583 (2012).

65.

Fischer, W. Lipoteichoic acids and lipoglycans. New Comprehensive Biochemistry 27, 199–215 (1994).

66.

Brown, S., Santa Maria, J. P. Jr. & Walker, S. Wall teichoic acids of gram-positive bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 67, 313–336 (2013).

67.

Zeiri, L., Bronk, B., Shabtai, Y., Eichler, J. & Efrima, S. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a tool for probing specific biochemical components in bacteria. Applied Spectroscopy 58, 33–40 (2004).

68.

van der Mei, H. C. & Busscher, H. J. Bacterial cell surface heterogeneity: a pathogen’s disguise. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002821 (2012).

69.

Erlandsen, S. L., Kristich, C. J., Dunny, G. M. & Wells, C. L. High-resolution visualization of the microbial glycocalyx with low-voltage scanning electron microscopy: dependence on cationic dyes. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 52, 1427–1435 (2004).

70.

Czamara, K. et al. Raman spectroscopy of lipids: a review. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 46, 4–20 (2015).

— Nature Scientific Reports

[titolive312]

Those who improve with age embrace the power of personal growth and personal achievement and begin to replace youth with wisdom, innocence with understanding, and lack of purpose with self-actualization. Good morning IG! #LasVegas #LosAngeles #Phoenix #SanDiego #Seattle #SanFrancisco #Oakland #SanJose #Dallas #Pilsen #Houston #Austin #Chicago #NewYork #NewJersey #Miami #MiamiBeach #WestPalmBeach #FortLauderdale #Vegas #WindyCity #SinCity #ChiTown #LA #Chi #305 #312 #Portland #Vancouver #Toronto  (at Publican Anker)

[technationgr]

ANKER Wall Charger 312 25W USB-C

High charging speed: supports 25 W Samsung super fast charging to fully charge a Galaxy S23 in less than 1.5 hours.

[superbgentlemenearthquake-blog]

United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Report 2017

Report Hive market Research Released a New Research Report of 105 pages on Title "United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Report 2017" with detailed Analysis, Forecast and Strategies.

In this report, the United States Solar Mobile Chargers market is valued at USD XX million in 2016 and is expected to reach USD XX million by the end of 2022, growing at a CAGR of XX% between 2016 and 2022.

Geographically, this report splits the United States market into seven regions: The West Southwest The Middle Atlantic New England The South The Midwest with sales (volume), revenue (value), market share and growth rate of Solar Mobile Chargers in these regions, from 2012 to 2022 (forecast).

United States Solar Mobile Chargers market competition by top manufacturers/players, with Solar Mobile Chargers sales volume, price, revenue (Million USD) and market share for each manufacturer/player; the top players including Suntrica EMPO-NI Suntactics Voltaic Solio Goal Zero Xtorm Xsories Anker POWER TRAVELLER Yingli Solar Suntech Quanzhou Yuanmingrong Shenzhen Portable Electronic Letsolar Hanergy Lepower Ecsson RIPA Allpowers

Request Research Sample:  https://www.reporthive.com/request-sample.php?id=857028

On the basis of product, this report displays the sales volume, revenue, product price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into Single Output Solar Mobile Chargers Dual Output Solar Mobile Chargers On the basis on the end users/applications, this report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, sales volume, market share and growth rate of Solar Mobile Chargers for each application, including Mobile Phone Charging Application Digital Camera Charging Application MP3 Charging Application Other Application

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Table of Contents

United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Report 2017 1 Solar Mobile Chargers Overview 1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Solar Mobile Chargers 1.2 Classification of Solar Mobile Chargers by Product Category 1.2.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Size (Sales Volume) Comparison by Type (2012-2022) 1.2.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Size (Sales Volume) Market Share by Type (Product Category) in 2016 1.2.3 Single Output Solar Mobile Chargers 1.2.4 Dual Output Solar Mobile Chargers 1.3 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market by Application/End Users 1.3.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Size (Consumption) and Market Share Comparison by Application (2012-2022) 1.3.2 Mobile Phone Charging Application 1.3.3 Digital Camera Charging Application 1.3.4 MP3 Charging Application 1.3.5 Other Application 1.4 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market by Region 1.4.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Size (Value) Comparison by Region (2012-2022) 1.4.2 The West Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.3 Southwest Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.4 The Middle Atlantic Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.5 New England Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.6 The South Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.4.7 The Midwest Solar Mobile Chargers Status and Prospect (2012-2022) 1.5 United States Market Size (Value and Volume) of Solar Mobile Chargers (2012-2022) 1.5.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales and Growth Rate (2012-2022) 1.5.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Revenue and Growth Rate (2012-2022)

Browse Full Report- https://www.reporthive.com/details/united-states-solar-mobile-chargers-market-report-2017

2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Competition by Players/Suppliers 2.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales and Market Share of Key Players/Suppliers (2012-2017) 2.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Revenue and Share by Players/Suppliers (2012-2017) 2.3 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Average Price by Players/Suppliers (2012-2017) 2.4 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Competitive Situation and Trends 2.4.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Concentration Rate 2.4.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Players/Suppliers 2.4.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion in United States Market 2.5 United States Players/Suppliers Solar Mobile Chargers Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area, Product Type

3 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales (Volume) and Revenue (Value) by Region (2012-2017) 3.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales and Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Revenue and Market Share by Region (2012-2017) 3.3 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Price by Region (2012-2017)

4 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales (Volume) and Revenue (Value) by Type (Product Category) (2012-2017) 4.1 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales and Market Share by Type (Product Category) (2012-2017) 4.2 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Revenue and Market Share by Type (2012-2017) 4.3 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Price by Type (2012-2017) 4.4 United States Solar Mobile Chargers Sales Growth Rate by Type (2012-2017)

Key questions answered in the report

· What will the market size and the growth rate be in 2022? · What are the key factors driving the Solar Mobile Chargers? · What are the key market trends impacting the growth of the Solar Mobile Chargers? · What are the challenges to market growth? · Who are the key vendors in this market space? · What are the market opportunities and threats faced by the vendors in the Solar Mobile Chargers? · Trending factors influencing the market shares of the Americas, APAC, and EMEA? · What are the key outcomes of the five forces analysis of the Solar Mobile Chargers?

About Us

Report Hive is a leading repository of market research reports and solutions catering to industries like Communication & Technology, Energy & Power, Food And Beverages, Automotive & Transportation, Healthcare & Life Science etc. This large collection of reports assists organizations in decision-making on aspects such as market entry strategies, market sizing, market share analysis, competitive analysis, product portfolio analysis and opportunity analysis among others. We also assist in determining the best suited and targeted report from our large repository of global reports, company-specific reports and country-level reports.

Contact Us

Mike Ross Marketing Manager mike.ross@reporthive.com http://www.reporthive.com +1-312-604-7084