#Andrea dworkin

[being-kindrad]

That is the "the right view women as private property" part in Dworkin's quote.

Pairing with a man causes the woman to be viewed as private property. To outsiders she's "taken" quite literally, like an object off a shelf. Private prostitution is what is seen, as mentioned above. The man expects his female private property to be sexually available upon his whim as part of their "trade agreement". In the patriarchal society, the woman is promised "safety and security" from being treated as public property, in exchange for being treated as private property.

It's a "pick your poison" scenario women are faced with in a misogynistic world.

Men who say that their wives MUST "give them" sex because they "provide and earn money" as an obligatory wifely duty and if she exercises her bodily autonomy to say no to sex are shrinking from their responsibility - are basically saying their wives are whores and marriage for women is sex work where they sell sex for money

[scum-advocate23]

Pornography - Men Possessing Women

Andrea Dworkin

Analysis of Whip Chick:

Themes and Symbolism:

- Portrays male power as precarious and easily transformed by ambitious women

- Targets feminists as the subgroup most threatening to male power

- Serves as an argument for male dominance, despite its seemingly contradictory content

Key Points:

- Warns that feminists want to castrate males and use their sexuality against them

- Portrays punishment as a male prerogative unless he fails to be masculine enough

- Depicts force as integral to sexual behavior and dominance as the ultimate purpose

Interpretation:

- Seen as a "cunning and effective argument for male dominance" despite its content

- Allows men to experiment with imagined consequences of losing power over women

- Reinforces traditional notions of masculinity and male sexual power

[erebusvincent]

[dressed2k1ll]

NAME THE PROBLEM.

Men are forcing women to have sex with them for food.

Women are forced to let men rape them to survive.

Men are withholding food for sex in war-torn Sudan

There are a BILLION WAYS TO NAME THE PROBLEM JUST DO IT

[being-kindrad]

Andrea Dworkin's classic Beauty Hurts diagram from Woman Hating (1974), updated for modern procedures, fifty years later.

A first step in the process of liberation (women from their oppression, men from the unfreedom of their fetishism) is the radical redefining of the relationship between women and their bodies. The body must be freed, liberated, quite literally: from paint and girdles and all varieties of crap. Women must stop mutilating their bodies and start living in them. Perhaps the notion of beauty which will then organically emerge will be truly democratic and demonstrate a respect for human life in its infinite, and most honorable, variety. —Andrea Dworkin, Woman Hating (1974)

[dworkinsdaughter]

[woman-for-women]

“...men come to me or to other feminists and say:

"What you're saying about men isn't true. It isn't true of me. I don't feel that way. I'm opposed to all of this."

And I say: don't tell me. Tell the pornographers. Tell the pimps. Tell the warmakers. Tell the rape apologists and the rape celebrationists and the pro-rape ideologues. Tell the novelists who think that rape is wonderful. Tell Larry Flynt. Tell Hugh Hefner. There's no point in telling me. I'm only a woman. There's nothing I can do about it. These men presume to speak for you. They are in the public arena saying that they represent you. If they don't, then you had better let them know."

- Andrea Dworkin

[radfem-vex]

I've noticed there is no concrete radical feminist symbol 🤔

The existing symbols either have a specific meaning that doesn't mean "radical feminism" (such as the labrys lesbian flag being associated with radfem but doesn't mean radfem) or they are indistinguishable from a mainstream feminism symbol.

So I've decided to create one! I have put together a few versions with different colours. If you want a different colour (up to two colours) just ask me (via comments/reblogs)! Feel free to ask with hex codes also.

Image descriptions on alt text.

Here are the non-transparent PNG versions:

1.

This is the basic black one on a white background, where a female symbol ♀️ contains a radical √. √ also means root which is the type of "radical" used in "radical feminism." Radfem isn't about "extremism" (the other meaning of radical) but rather is about destroying patriarchy at the root.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Here are the transparent PNG versions:

1.

2.

3.

4.

(Remaining 2 images continued on reblog)

[strezzedanddeprezzed]

It baffles me how radical feminists are considered conservative when the idea of female separatism is 10x more radical and far left than most of the beliefs held by left-wing parties. I will not listen to anyone who calls radical feminism a conservative ideology because it means they haven't done any research or reading.

We don't hate porn because we think women should be pure virgins who only commit to one man, we hate porn because it degrades women and is the product of sex trafficking, coercion, and propaganda.

We don't hate tight clothing and makeup because we think women should be covered from head to toe, we hate it because it restricts movement and makes day to day life uncomfortable for women.

We don't criticize the trans community because we think everyone should conform to gender roles and there should be no attempt to break the gender binary, we criticize the fact that transition is based on stereotypes, norms, roles, clothing, and other things women have fought for years to be free from.

Radical feminism does a better job at attacking actual oppressive structures and frameworks than most other leftist ideologies and I am done with ignorant people online comparing radical feminism to trad wife life or traditional conservatism. Especially when this criticism comes from losers who spend all day watching porn that promotes racism and classism.

[scum-advocate23]

Pornography - Men Possessing Women

Andrea Dworkin

“Fucking requires that the male act on one who has less power and this valuation is so deep, so completely implicit in the act, that the one who is fucked is stigmatized as feminine during the act even when not anatomically female.”

[mlfeminist]

Feminism exists so that no woman ever has to face her oppressor in a vacuum, alone. It exists to break down the privacy in which men rape, beat, and kill women.—Life and Death (1997)

[haggishlyhagging]

Sexual Politics is out of print. The Dialectic of Sex is out of print. What women have to do is come to terms with the fact that we live in a society that simply censors better than state censorship. People have got to come to terms with the power of the publishing industry and the media in controlling thought and expression. They have to understand that it is an issue of power and money and people have to be less passive in relation to books. People have to take their money which they don't have much of and they have to buy books by feminist writers. They have to develop a much more sophisticated understanding of how the book industry works. A hard-cover book like Letters from a War Zone was virtually published dead. If it's still in bookstores in two months it will be a miracle. They have to understand that everything that they hear all the time about how everything can be published in this country is a lie and that part of the social function of the publishing industry is to buy up the rights to and then obliterate certain books so that nobody can get them. They have to stop thinking that they live in the liberal dreamworld of equality where fairness has already been achieved. It hasn't been achieved. You can be equal in your heart but it doesn't make you equal in the world. I think that the refusal to understand what happens to books by women goes along with this liberal refusal to acknowledge that power is a reality and we're not the ones who have it. What I'm saying is that women have got to start facing reality. You cannot build any kind of movement for change on wishful thinking. The wishful thinking is that we already have what it is we want and what it is we need. We don't have it. Women who want to write and communicate, which in a big country is hard to do—it's getting harder for them, not easier. There isn't more access, there is less access. People have got to take the economics of the publishing industry seriously and understand that very few writers will survive who do not write according to the demands of the marketplace, by which I mean essentially the demands of turning out books that you can consume as passively as a television show. That's sort of the standard.

-Andrea Dworkin, “Dworkin on Dworkin” in Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed

[dressed2k1ll]

The left wants women as public property and the right wants women as private property.

It’s that simple!

Guess what! WOMEN ARENT PROPERTY

[thatsonemorbidcorvid]

“She left. She’s not coming back. How do you own her? You kill her.”

- Andrea Dworkin, 1996

A recording of a previously lost Dworkin speech has been made available, online, free, and with no barriers to access.

[z0ruas]

“Female knowledge of objectification usually stops at a necessary but superficial understanding: beauty is rewarded and lack of beauty is punished. The punishments are understood as personal misfortune; they are not seem as systematic, institutional, or historical. Women do not understand that they are also punished through sexual use for being beautiful; and women do not understand the lengths to which men go to protect themselves and their society from contamination by ugly women who do not induce a lustful desire to punish, violate, or destroy, though men manage to punish, violate, or destroy these women anyway.” ― Andrea Dworkin

[femalethink]

The public censure of women as if we are rabid because we speak without apology about the world in which we live is a strategy of threat that usually works. Men often react to women’s words—speaking and writing—as if they were acts of violence; sometimes men react to women’s words with violence. So we lower our voices. Women whisper. Women apologize. Women shut up. Women trivialize what we know. Women shrink. Women pull back. Most women have experienced enough dominance from men—control, violence, insult, contempt—that no threat seems empty.

—Andrea Dworkin, "Intercourse."