#Alimony Awards

[familylawinphiladelphia]

Understanding Alimony Awards: How Alimony and Support Lawyers Can Help

Divorce is a complex and emotionally charged process that involves various legal, financial, and personal considerations. One of the most contentious issues arising during a divorce is the question of alimony or spousal support. Alimony is a financial arrangement that requires one spouse to provide financial support to the other after the dissolution of their marriage. The purpose of alimony is to help the lower-earning spouse maintain a reasonable standard of living post-divorce. This article will explore the intricacies of alimony awards and highlight how alimony and support lawyers can assist divorcing spouses in navigating this challenging aspect of divorce.

What is Alimony?

Alimony is a court-ordered financial payment made by one spouse to the other during or after a divorce. The primary objective of alimony is to alleviate the economic disparity between the spouses. It helps ensure that the lower-earning spouse can maintain a lifestyle similar to the one enjoyed during the marriage. Alimony can be temporary or permanent, and depends on the divorce circumstances and the spouses' financial needs.

Factors Influencing Alimony Awards

Several factors influence the court's decision to award alimony, including the payment amount and duration. These factors may vary by jurisdiction but generally include:

Length of the Marriage: Longer marriages are more likely to result in alimony awards, especially if one spouse sacrificed career opportunities for the marriage.

Financial Needs and Resources: The court considers the recipient spouse's financial needs and the paying spouse's ability to provide support.

Standard of Living: The court aims to ensure that both parties can maintain a lifestyle similar to that they enjoyed during the marriage.

Age and Health: The age and health of both spouses can impact the duration and amount of alimony.

Earning Capacity: The court evaluates each spouse's current and future earning potential, considering education, work experience, and employability.

Contributions to the Marriage: Contributions can include financial support, homemaking, child-rearing, and emotional support.

How Alimony and Support Lawyers Can Help

Navigating the complexities of alimony requires a deep understanding of family law and the unique circumstances of each case. Alimony and support lawyers specialize in representing clients in matters related to spousal support. Here are some ways they can assist divorcing spouses:

Legal Expertise and Guidance

Alimony and support lawyers have in-depth knowledge of family law and can provide invaluable legal guidance throughout the divorce process. They can explain the types of alimony, how they apply to your situation, and what to expect in court. This expertise is crucial in ensuring that your rights and interests are protected.

Negotiation and Mediation

Many alimony disputes can be resolved through negotiation or mediation, avoiding a lengthy and costly court battle. Alimony and support lawyers can negotiate on your behalf, striving for a fair and equitable agreement that meets your needs. They can also represent you in mediation sessions, helping to facilitate constructive discussions and reach a mutually acceptable resolution.

Court Representation

If negotiations fail and the case goes to court, having an experienced alimony lawyer is essential. They can present your case effectively, providing compelling arguments and evidence to support your position. A skilled attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case, potentially securing a more favorable alimony award.

Post-Divorce Modifications

Circumstances can change after a divorce, affecting the ability to pay or the need for alimony. Alimony and support lawyers can assist with post-divorce modifications, whether you're seeking to increase, decrease, or terminate alimony payments. They can guide you through the legal process and represent your interests in court.

Alimony is a complex and often contentious aspect of divorce that requires careful consideration, informed choices, and legal expertise. Alimony and support lawyers are vital in helping divorcing spouses navigate this challenging terrain. From providing legal guidance and objective advice to representing clients in negotiations and court, these professionals are essential in securing fair and equitable alimony arrangements.

If you're going through a divorce and facing issues related to alimony, it's crucial to consult with an experienced alimony and support lawyer. Their expertise can help you understand your rights, protect your best interests, and ensure you receive or pay alimony that reflects your situation's realities. By seeking professional legal assistance, you can achieve a more favorable outcome and move forward with confidence and peace of mind.

[doyoulikethissong-poll]

Fats Waller - Ain't Misbehavin' 1929

"Ain't Misbehavin'" is a 1929 song written by Fats Waller, Harry Brooks and Andy Razaf. Waller recorded the original version that year for Victor Records and also later re-recorded the song for the 1943 film Stormy Weather. In a 1941 interview with Eddie "Rochester" Anderson, Fats claimed the song was written while "lodging" in alimony prison, and that is why he was not "misbehaving".

There were six other recordings of the song released in 1929, including versions by Louis Armstrong, Ruth Etting, Gene Austin, and Leo Reisman and His Orchestra. It was also used in the off-Broadway musical Connie's Hot Chocolates.

It has been recorded by many other performers over the years, including Billie Holiday, Eartha Kitt, Ella Fitzgerald, Django Reinhardt, Miles Davis, Ray Charles, Nat King Cole, and Willie Nelson, to name a few.

The original 1929 recording of "Ain't Misbehavin'" by Fats Waller received the Grammy Hall of Fame Award in 1984, and it was one of fifty recordings selected for inclusion in the National Recording Registry by the Library of Congress in 2004.

"Ain't Misbehavin'" received a total of 79,6% yes votes!

[msk29fan]

More questions on Gravity Fall's marriage laws...

Apparently you can marry raccoons and woodpeckers in Gravity Falls, I wonder what the procedure are for divorcing them.

Is the reason that guy won't divorce his woodpecker wife is because Gravity Falls courts favor the animal partner in awarding property/alimony (because the animals technically can't get paying jobs?)

Is that McGucket is still living with his raccoon wife in the Northwest mansion in the series finale?

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

But there was an anon - I don't remember where I saw the comment - that speculated Meghan is going to hang in there until they've been married 10 years because of the joint property/asset laws that kick in at the 10th anniversary. That sounds pretty plausible to me, but with two major caveats:

What difference does the joint assets make? all Harry's asset was his mother's inheritance that he put in the mansion, she'll get it anyway with the custody, Spotify was hers, Spare was his and Netflix mixed

So first, I goofed. I didn't do the due diligence to look into the 10-year-rule. I thought it was about joint property but it's not. The 10-year-rule is actually about alimony and financial support. I think the thread there that my brain latched on to is how community property can be used as a bargaining chip in deciding alimony.

Also, I am not a lawyer. This is all stuff I've read about. If any lawyers want to chime in here, feel free!

So in a community property state, which California is, both spouses own everything earned, acquired, gained, lost, debted during a marriage equally. It doesn't matter whose name is on the paperwork. If it was acquired during the marriage, it belongs to both spouses. So the house, Spotify, Netflix, Clevr, Roop, speaking engagements, cars, any debt accrued, etc. They share that equally and when they divorce, it's going to be split in half. (And I suspect they'll fight over which half of the deals and how much money is half in the divorce.)

Now, also in a community property state like California, there's no prescribed length of marriage to earn half of everything earned and acquired in the marriage. The only instance in which assets are not divided 50/50 in a community property state like California is when there's a prenuptial (or a postnuptial) agreement in place outlining how the assets would be divided in case of a separation or divorce.

It's my understanding that the BRF doesn't do prenups like that so it's probably a safe assumption that Harry and Meghan don't have a prenup and they're going to be splitting all of the assets/properties/finances acquired after May 19, 2018 equally.

You mentioned Montecito Mansion being paid for with Harry's Diana inheritance. That makes Montecito Mansion commingled property - meaning it is both community and separate. So probably what would happen in that case is if there's a divorce and the divorce requires them to sell the house (which could happen), then the court would first award Harry a lump sum from the sale proceeds equivalent to the amount of Diana's inheritance that he paid, and if there's any money left, it's split equally between him and Meghan.

That's the community property side of it. Now for the alimony piece where the 10 years is important.

California has a 10-year rule for alimony:

For marriages lasting 10 years or less, alimony is usually awarded for half of the mariage.

For marriages lasting more than 10 years, alimony can be awarded on a permanent basis, with indefinite jurisdiction for modification (or termination).

So if the Sussexes divorce next month with after six years of marriage, alimony can be awarded up to, and no more than, 3 years. If the Sussexes divorce in 2029 after 11 years of marriage, there's no expiration date on the alimony. For example, a court could award it for 11 years or in perpetuity or for 8 years.

How much alimony someone is awarded is based on their financial need and stability. If Meghan wants alimony from Harry (aka Charles), it's possible she could agree to less of the community property to better her chances.

Will it happen? I don't think so. I don't think they're going to get alimony unless their situation changes very drastically. The only reason Sarah and Diana got alimony in their divorces was because they were dependent on their husbands/the BRF. (They took alimony in lump sum payments as part of divorce settlements versus recurring payments.) That's not Meghan's situation because a) she's in a community property state so she gets half of everything automatically and b) she has the ability to provide for herself in a way that Sarah and Diana could not.

And by "situation changes very drastically" I mean like the Sussexes lose all of their money and Charles takes them back as fulltime working royals. In that case, Meghan has become dependent on the BRF again so she would most likely get alimony.

What's more likely to happen is child support. Child support in California is assigned based on standard of living the children are used to. So if Meghan can prove that the children have a standard of living that's $2 million per month (mortgage, private school, nannies, drivers, chefs, gourmet food), she could very well end up getting $2 million a month in child support from Harry. Will that happen? Probably not, and that's her own fault because of all the PR she's done about her net worth and earning power. But it could happen.

But the TL;DR of it is that I goofed. 10 years is about alimony, not joint assets. California is a community property state so they split everything 50/50 unless they have a contract (usually a prenup), which I doubt.

And that's also why Meghan must tread carefully when it comes to Roop. She could very well end up owing Harry if it's successful and she leaves him. Not only could she owe Harry alimony or child support (if he/his lawyers can prove he's the main caretaker for the children since Meghan's working all the time - as her own PR has sometimes suggested), she could also end up being forced to give him the company entirely or having to buy out his ownership.

(Which is also something that could happen to the house. Because it's community property and belongs to both of them and probably has both of their names on the deed, someone is probably going to be buying the other one out of the house to keep it for themselves unless they put it up for sale together.)

Remember, I am not a lawyer. Everything I learned about California divorces came from Google and Celebrity Divorces.

[story-addict]

Claim to Fame S3

Episode 1

2 Truths & a Lie and Talent Show

Miguel (Raphael) - Grandfather (Aunt), Actor, Oscar

Gracie Lou (Gracie Hyland) - Uncle, Musician (Actor), Emmy

Dedrick (Sigmund) - Uncle, Musician, Best Rock Song of the Year

Danny - Uncle, Wrestler (Musician), Grammy

Hud - Mom, Musician, Grammy

Jill - Grandfather (Uncle), Actor, People’s Choice Award

Adam - Uncle, Actor (Musician), Grammy

Shane - Cousin, Actor, Oscar

Mackenzie - Dad, Musician, Tony

Naomi - Cousin, Musician, Young Artist Award

Bianca - Aunt, Actress, Peabody

Wine Clue Winner - Gracie Lou (chose Naomi's clue)

Bottom Two - Miguel & Bianca (Guesser)

Incorrect Guess - Shane related to Forest Whitaker

Revealed - Bianca related to Robin Roberts

Episode 2

Spelling Bee Riddles

Bianca - Alley Oop = Robin Roberts (used to play & ESPN)

Mackenzie - Goatee = Trace Adkins

Hud - Jubilee = John Mellencamp (The Lonesome Jubilee)

Jill - Gemini = John Stamos (Full House)

Danny - Maraca = Marc Anthony (Latin Music Singer)

Gracie Lou - Alimony = Jon Cryer (Two and a Half Men)

Dedrick - Giraffe = Michael Jackson (owned giraffes)

Naomi - Chastity = Molly Ringwald (Pretty in Pink)

Shane - Valkyrie = Marlon Brando (Apocalypse Now)

Missing Riddles = Adam & Miguel

Wine Clue Winner - Naomi (chose Hud's clue)

Guessers - Gracie Lou & Jill

Incorrect Guess by Jill - Miguel related to Antonio Banderas

Incorrect Guess by Gracie Lou - Adam related to Dustin Hoffman

Revealed - Jill related to John Stamos

Revealed - Gracie Lou related to Jon Cryer

Episode 3

Telephone Limericks

Limerick #1

On the mountain there once was a lion, In a handmade rose dress she was stylin, But her dancing was bad, And it made the town sad, So they shipped her right off to the island. 

Limerick #2

His toga was in disarray, On an oddly peculiar Friday, He wrote a honky tonk song,  But his hair was too long, And his pompadour needed a spray. 

Hud - Lion = "Johny Cougar" = John Mellencamp

Naomi - Rose Dress = "Pretty in Pink" movie = Molly Ringwald

Dedrick - Dancing was Bad = "Bad" song = Michael Jackson

Miguel - Oddly Peculiar Friday = "Freaky Friday" movie = Jamie Lee Curtis

Mackenzie - Honky Tonk Song = "Honky Tonk Badonkadonk" song = Trace Adkins

Danny - Toga = "Roman: Mark Anthony" = Marc Anthony

Adam - Hair too long = Michael Bolton

Shane - Pompadour = Marlon Brando

Wine Clue Winner - Danny (chose Dedrick's clue)

Bottom Two - Shane & Miguel (Guesser)

Incorrect Guess by Miguel - Dedrick related to Little Richard

Revealed - Miguel related to Jamie Lee Curtis

Episode 4

Lie Detector Test

Wine Clue Winner - Shane (chose Mackenzie's clue)

Bottom Two - Hud & Adam (Guesser)

Revealed by Adam - Naomi related to Molly Ringwald

Episode 5

Wheel Of Senses

Miguel - Pumpkin Pie & Cotton Balls = "Halloween" & "Scream Queens" = Jamie Lee Curtis

Shane - Cannoli & Spaghetti = "The Godfather" Movie = Marlon Brando

Dedrick - Bubble Wrap & Egg Beater = "Bubbles" the monkey & "Beat It" song = Michael Jackson

Adam - Mullet & Bolt = Michael Bolton

Mackenzie - Fried Chicken & Horse Manure = "Brown Chicken Brown Cow" song & Country Singer = Trace Adkins

Hud - Chili Dog & Melon = "Jack & Diane" song & "MELLENcamp" = John Mellencamp

Danny - Bongos & Fire = Latin singer & "Man on Fire" movie = Marc Anthony

Naomi - 16th Birthday Cake & Pancake = "Sixteen Candles" & "The Breakfast Club" movies = Molly Ringwald

Wine Clue Winner - Adam & Hud (chose Danny's clue)

Bottom Two - Shane & Dedrick (Guesser)

Incorrect guess by Dedrick - Adam related to Owen Wilson

Revealed - Dedrick related to Michael Jackson

Episode 6

Connect the Dots

Danny's Clue (taken by Hud)

"This Latin superstar starred in an action thriller with Dakota Fanning and Denzel Washington" = Marc Anthony

Trail to get there: Driver's License -> Olivia Rodrigo -> Uptown Girl -> Dakota Fanning -> Marc Anthony

Shane's Clue (taken by Hud)

"This actor's character played an integral part in helping save Superman's life as an infant in the original film" = Marlon Brando

Trail to get there: Jennifer Lawrence -> The Hunger Games -> Liam Hemsworth -> Henry Cavil -> Superman -> Marlon Brando

Adam's Clue (taken by Shane)

"This love ballad specialist gave Kelly Clarkson a true fan-girl moment when he surprised her by singing a duet with her on her talk show" = Michael Bolton

Trail to get there: Olympics -> Georgia -> Luke Bryan -> American Idol -> Kelly Clarkson -> Michael Bolton

Hud's Clue (taken by Adam)

"Madonna and the "Small Town" farm boy were both inducted into the rock and roll hall of fame in 2008" = John Mellencamp

Trail to get there: Amy Adams -> Patrick Dempsey -> Grey's Anatomy -> Seattle -> Madonna -> John Mellencamp

Mackenzie's Clue (taken by Mackenzie)

"While Missy Elliot talked about her Gadonk-a-donk-donk, this singer talked about a Badonkadonk that was Honky Tonk" = Trace Adkins

Trail to get there: Quarterback -> Patrick Mahones -> Taylor Swift -> Grammy -> Missy Elliot -> Trace Adkins

Wine Clue Winner - Hud (chose Adam's clue)

Bottom Two - Shane & Danny (Guesser)

Incorrect guess by Danny - Mackenzie related to Blake Shelton

Revealed - Danny related to Marc Anthony

Episode 7

Clued In Board

Hud - John Mellencamp

Known As: Cougar

Professional Field: Music

Notable Appearances:

Notable Costars:

Mackenzie - Trace Adkins

Known As: Dangerous Man

Professional Field: Music

Notable Appearances:

Notable Costars:

Adam - Michael Bolton

Known As: Mr. Time, Love & Tenderness

Professional Field: Music

Notable Appearances:

Notable Costars:

Shane - Marlon Brando

Known As: Mr Mumbles

Professional Field: TV/Film

Notable Appearances:

Notable Costars: Martin Sheen

Wine Clue Winner - Mackenzie (chose Shane's clue)

Revealed by Mackenzie - Shane related to Marlon Brando

Episode 8 - Season Finale

Advertisement Billboard

Hud - John Mellencamp

Wheel of Senses: Watermelon

Connect the Dots: Player

Clued In Board: Cougar, Music

Revealed Billboard

Photo of Hud on Ranch Fence - Imitates "Scarecrow" Album Cover

Hud And The Scarecrows - Album "Scarecrow"

Opening Act: "Diane & Jack" - "Jack & Diane" song

Opening Act: "The Authority Fighters" - "Authority Song" song

Tonight at the Pink House Theater - "Pink Houses" Song

No one under 72 admitted - John Mellencamp's age is 72yo

Mackenzie - Trace Adkins

Wheel of Senses: Horse

Connect the Dots: Dangerous Man, Music

Clued In Board:

Revealed Billboard

Photo of Mackenzie as a Cowgirl - Imitates "Dangerous Man" Album Cover

Mackenzie Dangerous Woman - Album "Dangerous Man"

"Men love Country Girls" - "Ladies Love Country Boys" song

Grand Ole Opry Member - Member of The Grand Ole Opry

Celebrity Apprentice Winner - Winner of Celebrity Apprentice

Tonight Only at the Monarch Theater - "Monarch" TV show

Adam - Michael Bolton

Wheel of Senses: Mr Time, Love & Tenderness, Music

Connect the Dots:

Clued In Board:

Billboard - NOT REVEALED

Revealed by Adam - Mackenzie related to Trace Adkins

Revealed by Adam - Hud related to John Mellencamp

WINNER - ADAM RELATED TO MICHAEL BOLTON

The Wine Cellar Clues

Bianca (eliminated before taken) - "Good Morning America Anchor who Plays BasketBall" = Robin Roberts

Naomi (taken by Gracie Lou) - "Bratpack Princess in Breakfast Club" = Molly Ringwald

Hud (taken by Naomi) - "Cherry Bomb Artist who Hurts So Good" = John Mellencamp

Jill (eliminated before taken) - "SitCom Uncle in the 90s who Plays Drums" = John Stamos

Gracie Lou (eliminated before taken) - "Loves Girl in Pink & Plays Bad Guy in Superman" = Jon Cryer

Miguel (eliminated before taken) = "80's Scream Queen Turned 90's Secret Agent" = Jamie Lee Curtis

Dedrick (taken by Danny) - "Scarecrow Who Walks Backwards In NeverLand" = Michael Jackson

Mackenzie (taken by Shane) - "6 ft 6 Country Music Artist Who Won Celebrity Apprentice" = Trace Adkins

Danny (taken by Adam & Hud) - "Man On Fire Latin Singer Who Fell for JLo" = Marc Anthony

Adam (taken by Hud) - "Long Haired 90's Artist who Sings Love Ballads" = Michael Bolton

Shane (taken by Mackenzie) - "Hollywood Icon with Italian Kingpin Role" = Marlon Brando

The Clue Wall

https://www.tvinsider.com/1141493/claim-to-fame-clue-wall-explained/

Bianca = Robin Roberts

Basketball Hoop = Southeastern Louisiana University & ESPN

USA Flag = Good Morning America

Microphone = ESPN

2. Gracie Lou = Jon Cryer

Army Men Toys = Two and a Half Men

Duck = Ducky in Pretty in Pink

3. Naomi = Molly Ringwald

Bacon and Eggs = "The Breakfast Club"

School Bus = "Sixteen Candles" & "The Breakfast Club"

School Supplies: Calculator, Abacus, Pencil - "The Breakfast Club"

4. Jill = John Stamos

Greek Yogurt = Oikos Super Bowl Commercial

Two Crabs = Twins/Full House = John Stamos

Drum

5. Hud = John Mellencamp

Scarecrow = Album

6. Miguel = Jamie Lee Curtis

Asian Props = "Freaky Friday" & "Everything Everywhere All at Once"

Knife = "Halloween" & "Knives Out"

Magnifying Glass and Footprints = "Knives Out"

Rock = "Everything Everywhere all at once"

7. Dedrick = Michael Jackson

Scarecrow = The Wiz

Moon = Moonwalk

Giraffe = Owned Giraffes

Bubbles = Michael Jackson's monkey

Egg Beater with phrase "Simple Life" = "Beat it" & "Destiny" songs

8. Mackenzie = Trace Adkins

9. Danny = Marc Anthony

Maracas

10. Adam = Michael Bolton

Lightning Bolt

11. Shane = Marlon Brando

Red Car = "A street car named desire"

Eiffel Tower = "Last Tango in Paris"

Others:

Spinning Balance Peg Top

Luggage Tag

Mardi Gras Mask

Screws on a piece of wood

Headphones

Wood Slingshot with Carved Bear that says "Shave....ke"

Lanyard with Butterfly and Whistle

Fishbowl with Moorish Idol fish and maybe fake jewels

Theater Mask

Vase with Palette 2 Knives

Weird White Object? (Bottom Left)

Snail? (beside school bus, upper left)

Basilica Art?

Fire Department Badge

Hawaii Ukulele

Feather Duster

Wall Thermometer

Grenade

Lock

Yawn Ball with triangle charm and over weird wood branch

Jewelry? (behind ukulele)

Red Bedazzled Heart

Orca Whale with sun charm in the mouth

Pink Mirror

Black Horse

Skateboard

Magic Wand

Concord Grape

$10000 stack

Baseball

Light bulb

Aviator glasses

Marionette of boy with sombrero

Doll

Corner Mirror

Star Police Badge

Bus Toy

Angel Figurine

Coconut Purse

Salt Shaker

Flashlight

Purple Silk Ribbon

Komodo Dragon

Converse Sneaker

Sombrero

White Bunny with Pink Collar that has a heart lock

Spoon

Yarn sun? (behind komodo dragon)

Hand Cuffs

Wrenches

Earring

Bubble Wrap Popping Toy of a Car

Pop Corn Bucket with Tickets Stubs coming out of it

Chair

Bicycle Horn

Wooden Door

White Afghan Hound

White Sea Coral

Game Console Controller with Ladybug

Robin Bird

Racket with voodoo doll? made out of wine corks

Weird Plastic (behind sombrero)

Clothes Hanger

Paint Palette

Cone with Asian characters, wine corks and sticks at the top

Stapler

Sea Journal

Cowboy Hat with Tiara

Native Mask

Electric Guitar

Notepad

Sailor with ship helm

Bird Cage

Piano

Hand Fan

Tree

Kettle

Car mph gage?

Snake

Apple

12 point metal Star

Harmonica with Asian characters and "hero"

Asian doll with flute

Glass Rose

Green fish

USA flag

Queen Doll

Weird platter (under USA flag)

Porcelain lady figurine

Yellow Old time car

Yueqin (chinese musical instrument)

Treasure chest with $100

Paint Brush

Foreign Coat of Arms

Piggy Bank

Black Pepper shaker

Green toadstool

Hourglass

Blue tennis ball

Olympic? Medal (behind maracas)

Red & Green Pepper on a bowl

Stethoscope

Blank book

World Map

Horn? (bottom right)

Music Sheet

Military Plane

Spatula

Bell

Flower Crown

Amputated Hand with metal Bracelet

[neonphoenix]

Wilson family head canons for the day:

Slade and Adeline aren't legally divorced

He still pays alimony

Does Not pay child support

Adeline wins the custody fight so completely she also gets custody of Rose. Post their divorce.

If he were not dead or otherwise pursuing the military, Grant would be a business major

Joey would attempt to double major in music and art (this would not work)

I have no college major ideas for Rose. Awarding her "English major" as a consolatory prize

Thank you that is all for the day goodbye.

[dwellordream]

“Before the American Revolution, New Englanders viewed the family as a strict hierarchy, an arrangement in which power flowed from top to bottom: The father was ruler of all, the mother was underneath him, and the (theoretically) obedient children were at the bottom. After 1800, however, that ideal changed. Book and magazine writers began picturing families in which men controlled the public realm of politics and business, but women took responsibility for the private sphere of the home. A marriage was viewed more as a partnership; true, the woman was still the junior partner, but the older model of the man as an absolute ruler was no longer fashionable among middle-class Northeasterners. 

…Because the man felt he was putting so much on the line by proposing, a ‘proper’ woman was expected to return a well-reasoned reply within a short period of time. A woman knew, however, that her response was perhaps her last chance to have control over her life. Once she said ‘yes,’ the legal cards would be stacked against her, regardless of the declarations of love by her suitor. Because the expectations of middle-class marriage had been raised so high, women found reports of marital disasters very disconcerting. One married woman wrote to a single friend that marriage was a ‘sad, sober beverage’ that brought ‘some joys, but many crosses’. 

…Once married, the suitors often cooled the fiery protestations of love found in their letters. Although many couples developed strong, deep bonds of affection, the idea of separate spheres--that women should stay at home, and men go out in the world--kept them apart for many hours of their lives. Advice books and religious sermons emphasized that wives were to make the home a haven of restfulness for their husbands. 

This separation of duties provided women with other companionship, however. The split between home and work strengthened friendships between women as they came to understand what they shared with each other and how their lives differed from men’s. Unlike a wife’s relationship with her husband, a friendship with another woman was based on equality. Although women developed networks of friends and relatives, intense relationships between two women were not uncommon. 

…Although divorces were growing faster among the urban northern middle class than any other group, such separations were still rare. Within the United States, only one in a thousand marriages ended in divorce before the Civil War. If a woman successfully sued for divorce, she would soon be wondering what price she had paid for her freedom. Alimony, or money paid regularly by a husband to his former wife, was rarely awarded, although judges occasionally ordered one-time cash settlements to women who had been abused by their husbands. If a woman had brought property into the marriage, she was not likely to take it back out. Once she and her husband said their ‘I do’s,’ her husband legally controlled all she owned. Her chances for finding work were few, especially if she was approaching or beyond middle age. 

…The nature of farming meant that women and men worked the same land, that women helped produce food and earn cash. Women thus saw the farm as a mutual effort. Frontier women were also less concerned than their eastern contemporaries with raising perfect families. On the frontier, children were valued as workers and companions. These conditions made for a more pragmatic approach to child rearing. Children were an important part of the work force on a prairie farm. While the size of northeastern middle-class families was shrinking dramatically during this period, frontier families were holding steady, averaging around seven children each. Compared to northeastern women, frontier women married earlier, had children earlier, and continued to give birth for more years--often past the age of 45. 

…Marriage relations between enslaved African Americans in the South changed little during the early 19th century. Legally, a master owned a slave and could compel that person to do whatever he wished. However, most slaveholders wanted their slaves to pair off and often sanctioned slave unions with their blessing, but marriages between slaves were not recognized legally. Nonetheless, most slave owners had at least one eye on their finances in supporting a slave’s choice in marriage. A typical plantation manual advised slaveholders that a slave marriage based on love would add ‘to the comfort, happiness, and health of those entering upon it, besides ensuring greater increase.’ Such marriages produced both stability and more slaves, two requirements of a successful plantation operation.

…Although many black couples exhibited as much restraint as middle-class couples up North, it was not uncommon for children to be born out of wedlock because slave culture did not make outcasts of unwed mothers. Instead, the slave community expected the new father and mother to wed, whereupon the newborn was immediately accepted into the community. Black couples made an extra effort to respect personal boundaries in an effort to replace some measure of the self-respect their owners tried to strip from them. Indeed, a number of white observers noted that while slave couples often adhered to Christian notions of sexual restraint, their aggressive masters frequently did not. 

…Southern plantation women married earlier than northern women, usually around the age of 20. By their mid-20s, when middle-class Northerners were marrying, single plantation women were being labeled ‘old maids.’ The southern ‘belle’ was spared nothing by her doting parents--she could purchase the latest fashions, then quickly discard them for a new ensemble. She lived in a sheltered world, punctuated by frequent balls and daily rounds of social calls to other fashionable women in the neighborhood. 

…Marriage relations among the southern planter class were in many ways an exaggerated version of those among the northeastern middle class. While virginity before marriage was expected for northeastern women, southern planter society placed an absolute premium on the bride’s ‘purity’. Northeastern women were placed on a platform and praised for their selflessness and moral rectitude. Plantation women were put upon a gilded pedestal, and southern writers extolled the refinement, piety, and grace by which these women surpassed all others. The result was a tightly constrained life that offered southern women few opportunities to move beyond the boundaries their society had established for them.”

Michael Goldberg, “Reasons of the Heart: Marriage and Courtship.�� in Breaking New Ground: American Women, 1800-1848

[chaplinlegend]

JOAN MARSH born July 10, 1914 as Nancy Ann Rosher in Porterville, California, briefly known as Dorothy D. Rosher.

One of the biggest movie stars of the 1930s. She gained popularity as a "platinum blonde", often compared to Jean Harlow. Her father, Charles Rosher, was a famous cameraman and a close relative of actress Mary Pickford.

Joan Marsh first appeared in front of the cameras as a 9-month-old baby ( The Mad Maid of the Forest ) 1915. Promoted by her father, Dorothy Rosher, as she was called, easily handled child roles. At first, she appeared in films alongside Mary Pickford - "Daddy Long Legs", "Pollyanna", but over time she managed to achieve independence. She attended several private schools, but did not stay in any for too long, because they isolated her from acting. At the age of 14, Joan began acting in films again. However, MGM, with whom she had a contract, usually gave her not very serious engagements. Joan had a beautiful voice and with the introduction of sound films, she had no problem moving to silent films. She played supporting roles alongside such movie stars as Greta Garbo, Joan Crawford and Loretta Young, but this did not change her image. In 1937, she got married for the first time, and three years later she returned to acting for the third time. At first, she was again given "sweet" roles, until she finally played in the film "The Road to Zanzibar", where she played with Bing Crosby and Bob Hope. It turned out that the actress had a great talent for comedy. Unfortunately, she was not able to use it, because in 1944 she ended her artistic career, discouraged by uninteresting offers. Her last film was "Follow the Leader" from 1944. Joan Marsh died in 2000 in Ojai, California. She was 87 years old.

Dorothy D. Rosher (Joan Marsh), at the age of just four, had a brief cameo in Charlie Chaplin's 1918 film "The Bond."

Fun Facts:

She appeared in 62 films. She won no awards or nominations.

Her father, Charles Rosher, was sentenced to prison in 1938 for failure to pay alimony to Joan Marsh following a July 1936 court case; Rosher stopped paying alimony to Marsh when she turned 18 because (he claimed) she was self-sufficient as an actress and was earning $100,000 a year.

Joan March, who married and divorced screenwriter Charles Belden, retired from the screen after marrying John D. W. Morrill in late 1944.

Her last film was 1944's "Follow the Leader".

[chiangmailawyer]

Divorce in Thailand

Divorce in Thailand, once a taboo subject, has become an increasingly common reality. While the country has undergone significant social and economic changes, its legal framework for divorce still reflects a complex interplay of traditional values and modern challenges.

The Two Paths to Divorce

Thailand offers two primary avenues for dissolving a marriage:

Administrative Divorce: This is the preferred method when both spouses agree on the terms of the divorce. The process is relatively straightforward, involving mutual consent and agreements on property division, child custody, and alimony. The couple must appear in person at the local district office (Amphoe) to finalize the divorce.  

Judicial Divorce: This route is necessary when the couple cannot reach an agreement on the terms of the divorce. Grounds for judicial divorce include adultery, cruelty, desertion, and imprisonment. The process is significantly more complex and time-consuming, involving court proceedings and potentially lengthy legal battles.

Factors Influencing Divorce Rates

Several factors have contributed to the rising divorce rates in Thailand:

Economic Development: Thailand's rapid economic growth has led to increased independence for women, particularly in urban areas. This newfound financial autonomy has empowered women to make their own choices, including decisions about their marriages.

Changing Social Values: Traditional Thai values, which emphasized family unity and stability, are gradually evolving. A growing acceptance of divorce as a viable option has contributed to the increasing number of couples seeking to dissolve their marriages.

Western Influence: The increasing exposure to Western culture and values through media and globalization has also played a role in changing attitudes towards divorce.

Education Levels: Higher education levels among women have correlated with higher divorce rates. This is likely due to increased awareness of legal rights and options, as well as greater financial independence.

Challenges and Implications

While divorce has become more socially acceptable, it still carries significant stigma in many parts of Thailand. Divorced women, in particular, may face social ostracism and challenges in finding new partners.

Moreover, the division of property and child custody can be contentious issues. Thai law generally favors the husband in property disputes, while child custody is often awarded to the mother. However, these norms are gradually changing as courts become more aware of women's rights.

The Role of Culture and Religion

Buddhism, the predominant religion in Thailand, emphasizes harmony and compassion. While it does not explicitly condone divorce, it does offer a framework for understanding and resolving conflicts. However, traditional Buddhist values, which prioritize family and community, can also create pressure on couples to stay together despite marital problems.

Looking Ahead

Divorce in Thailand is a complex issue with far-reaching implications for individuals, families, and society as a whole. As the country continues to modernize, it is likely that the legal framework and social attitudes towards divorce will undergo further changes.

It is essential to recognize the diversity of experiences within the Thai population. While divorce rates may be increasing overall, there are significant variations between urban and rural areas, different socioeconomic groups, and different religious affiliations.

Understanding the intricacies of divorce in Thailand requires a nuanced perspective that considers both legal and cultural factors.

[askylongingformemories]

1.Showdown On My Sombrero

A Sky Longing For Memories

   

"You have explicitly, expressed your contempt for me, You have got student loans to pay and can't risk alimony"

Nah, I am not writing a song lyrics, like I have even changed the first line cause even I am not interested in matrimony or stuff close to that, however the idea of ​​​​​​​​​having someone you like or can like, someone you can claim that when you go home you'll ask her out. Sometimes that someone can provide you a little hope and dream and a way to feel less miserable when you are suicidal. That sight of someone leaving actually hurts the most on the last day of school. Factually speaking I have got one more day to go to school as I have got an exam on 2nd April but its of a minor subject that only 25 out of 2-300 students had opted. So she'll not be coming . She has different subjects so she did not even come on 9th the day I saw most of my friends for last time. She has got an exam on 19th but I don't think I should go solely to meet her. After all I' ve got some self respect. Nah, actually I have not but I am haughty and if she was interested in me even half as much I was in her, she should have asked me out. I wouldn't have said no. Maybe. I wrote her messages. She didn't reply to any of them. None was informal, none was mentioning the sky I dream to go to with her. All were formal asking her to bring her books or whatever asking her to prepare for her part in the group activity we were in. Actually there were three of us and the other boy. Ah I so much love the classic love triangle .Thomas hardy wrote one with it- Far from the madding crowd.

"... and whenever I look up, there will be you."

She might be Everdene for me but I was none of her two lovers. I was the third wheel who watched all of it happen as if I had no say in the story-a proper NPC.A gal and a guy are talking in a room or in a walkway about physics ,chemistry or work .Suddenly a wild bidoof appears, and they stop talking, try to go away excuse themselves out. Bidoof texts the girl that he'll do this and that work and she'll do that work ,girl doesn't see even after being online. Sees it after a day, doesn't care to reply. Bidoof stops talking to her. Bidoof talks to the other guy who is a genuine friend and was a friend even before the gal arrived to know more about progress of work. The project is finished, group wins but gal talks and celebrates with guy. Bidoof also joins in. They talk for sometime. Go and collect award. Boy goes on to talk with other competitors and does no talk with team. Alpha male asks him to click his photos, he does but has no further talk. On the outset alpha is a general guy and bidoof has come to like him and respect him for he has also earned his place as one of the top 3 representing the school but so has bidof. Now what?

If you've been a third wheel before you know you are that bidoof. You are in team and you were critical at junctures , but no ONE cares. Actually one person cares and it's you Bidoof. MAKE SURE YOU DON'T CARE ANY LONGER , bidoof.

How do we fall in love-that would warrant another blog post. How love was manufacture d by durex to sell more condoms? And lawyers to make up reasons for women to marry men and take up half of their money when brain stops producing enough dopamine, oxytocin and like. And guys like Hardy and Dickens and Shaw and Shakespeare milked it to generate money. I might throw your pop musicians in as well for a good measure. Dylan, The Beatles, Cash, Smiths all talked of love even when they were in protest era, Even Vietnam vets CCR didn't shy from a song like that. And among fortunate son, Proud Mary and related stuff the most popular Creedence Clearwater Revival video is this one. Even most indie songs are of love as if you have nothing better to think about but about it, I'll talk next time. 

I'll come up with more stories about her and love is something that makes a man drunkard or author. I didn't get to experience any of it in high school so at least I got to write out a few stories of encounters I had with her to make up for lost time and opportunities to be happy

[saber-monet]

To Manifest more money, get more specific.

Here are a FEW( there’s nearly infinite ways, don’t close yourself off!) ways one can receive money

Treat it like Pokémon and collect them all lol

1. Salary/wages: Regular income earned from employment self/employment.

2. Investment returns: Profits gained from investments such as stocks, bonds, or real estate.

3. Inheritance: Money or assets received from a relative or benefactor.

4. Grants: Funds awarded by organizations or institutions for specific purposes, such as research or education.

5. Loan repayment: Money received when someone pays back a loan that was previously provided.

6. Dividends: Payments made to shareholders from the profits of a corporation.

7. Royalties: Payments received by creators for the use of their intellectual property, such as books, music, or inventions.

8. Tips: Additional money given as appreciation for services rendered, typically in industries like hospitality or personal services.

9. Rebates: Refunds or discounts given after a purchase, often as an incentive or promotion.

10. Alimony/child support: Regular payments made to a former spouse or partner for financial support.

11. Found money: Money discovered unexpectedly, such as in lost or forgotten accounts, or on the ground.

12. Lottery winnings: Prizes won through games of chance like lotteries or scratch-off tickets.

13. Refunds: Money returned to a consumer after returning a product or canceling a service.

14. Sponsorship: Funds provided by companies or individuals to support a person or organization in exchange for advertising or promotion.

15. Crowdfunding: Money raised from a large number of people, typically through online platforms, to support a project, cause, or individual.

16. Cashback rewards: Money returned to a consumer as a percentage of their purchases, often offered by credit card companies or retailers.

17. Scholarships: Funds awarded to students to help cover the costs of education, typically based on academic achievement, financial need, or other criteria.

18. Patronage: Financial support given by individuals or organizations to artists, writers, or other creatives to fund their work or projects.

19. Rental income: Money earned from leasing or renting out property or assets, such as real estate, vehicles, or equipment.

20. Contest winnings: Prizes awarded for winning competitions or contests, which may include cash or other rewards.

21. Side hustle earnings: Additional income earned from part-time or freelance work outside of one's primary job.

22. Government benefits: Financial assistance provided by the government to eligible individuals or families, such as unemployment benefits, social security, or welfare.

23. Referral bonuses: Money received for referring new customers or clients to a business or service.

24. Stock options: Compensation provided to employees in the form of company stock, often as part of their overall compensation package.

25. Affiliate marketing commissions: Money earned through promoting and selling products or services for companies as an affiliate marketer.

26. Consulting fees: Payments received for providing expert advice or services to clients or businesses.

27. Trust distributions: Money distributed to beneficiaries from a trust fund, typically according to the terms outlined in the trust agreement.

28. Liquidation proceeds: Money received from selling off assets, such as stocks, bonds, or property.

29. Cash gifts: Money given by friends, family, or acquaintances as a gesture of goodwill, celebration, or support.

30. Insurance payouts: Money received from insurance companies to cover losses, damages, or expenses incurred due to accidents, disasters, or other covered events.

Focus on the ones that fits your self concept the best, for the best results. 

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

re: Sussex divorce etc. I read all the time that all their revenue and expenses are ran through various companies ( 12 incorporated in Delaware and Wyoming, and Archewell). The House was purchased via a trust created for this purpose.

In the event of a divorce, do they split ownership of all these companies 50/ 50 as per california state laws? How does alimony and child support work when everything is in company names and not their personal property?

For tax purposes i see the advantage of putting everything into Foundations, companies and trusts, but it seems complications arise in the event of divorce espevially when those companies are registered out of state. Which state's laws would they satisfy? 

Further, i don't think Charles will help with the divorce ie supply lawyers and advise. FOR SURE he isn't on the hook for money because several ex-royals have tried to claim family dynasty wealth and lost which has set a legal precedent - see Tessa of Luxemborg and *Haya of Dubai. 

*Haya of Dubai got a large settlement ( roughly £1/2B) which clouds the fact that in reality she got very little. Prior to the divorce, she purchased 2 large properties for herself in UK - one is in London next to KP plus she had a fortune in jewellery collected over the course of the marriage.

Aside from her properties, clothing and jewellery, she asked for over £1B for alimony plus her children's trustfunds, child support AND security. 

Judge awarded her the properties, clothing, jewellery, children's trustfunds, child support and security. The alimony demand was slashed to less than £50M. The biggest chunk of her settlement ( almost 3/4 of entire settlement) was for security which the judge said would be at the highest level that money can buy for her and her kids' lifetimes as he agreed that her ex- Dubai hubby presented a clear and present danger for their lifetimes. 

On a different note, i still shudder at the hostage video Princess Latifa of Dubai posted to youtube before she disappeared to be reprogrammed. That video probably saved her life and or gave her bargaining chips for better treatment unlike her sister Princess Shamsa who hasn't been seen in public or by rest of her family since her abduction in the early 00s. 

[nussbaumfamilylaw]

What can a prenuptial agreement cover in Canada?

A prenup in Canada is a legal document that outlines an agreement between a married couple concerning their rights and obligations. But what issues or provisions go into a prenuptial agreement? A prenup can protect almost anything of value.

Working with a marriage lawyer in Toronto and other cities in Toronto is an excellent step. It can help ensure all essential matters are discussed and written in compliance with Ontario’s Family Law Act. When entering a prenuptial agreement, you and your future spouse can include the following stipulations.

OWNERSHIP OR DIVISIONS OF PROPERTY

One of the issues married couples deal with in divorce or separation is determining how to divide their assets. Division of property can be complex, but a family lawyer can help you explore your options. 

Without a marriage contract or prenuptial agreement, their property will generally be allocated based on the laws of Ontario. Married couples are automatically entitled to an equalization of net family property or equal rights of the profits of their marriage. The end of a marriage or the death of a spouse sets off the right to equalization.

That means if you don’t have a prenup, you must split all property acquired during the marriage equally. The reason for divorce does not matter. The same applies to the increase in value of any property spouses owned before getting married. 

The good news is that each spouse could protect significant assets they brought into or earned separately during the marriage. Through a prenuptial agreement, married couples can decide the handling of their property.

SPOUSAL SUPPORT OBLIGATIONS

A non-earning spouse may seek spousal support to live independently in the event of divorce. A court will typically examine numerous factors when awarding spousal support to the potential receiving spouse. 

Some people hesitate to sign a prenup because they believe its primary purpose is to avoid alimony. But without a prenuptial agreement, spouses will only rely on default state laws when their marriage ends. In most cases, this can lead to a long and frustrating court battle. 

Having a prenup allows married couples to choose the terms for spousal support obligations freely. They can agree on a predefined alimony amount and what conditions to seek spousal support when separating or to break up. 

Contrary to what others believe, a prenuptial agreement can help guarantee the right to spousal sport in the event of divorce. This will give married couples more peace of mind as they enter the marriage. 

PROVISIONS FOR THE EDUCATION AND MORAL TRAINING OF THEIR CHILDREN

A prenup in Ontario, Canada, doesn’t only protect both spouses. It can also provide legal protection for your children. If you or your spouse don’t yet have children, you can include specific provisions for them in the prenuptial agreement. 

Specifically, a prenuptial agreement allows married couples to plan how any existing or future children will be brought up morally and educationally. You and your spouse can agree on the following specifications in your prenup. 

ANY OTHER MATTER IN SETTLEMENT OF THE SPOUSES’ AFFAIRS

A prenuptial agreement can also cover expectations concerning your marital responsibilities. Note that you may not include non-financial duties like who will be responsible for taking out the trash every week. But you can have the following specifications in your prenup: 

Learn more about Prenuptial Agreement in Ontario

[mariacallous]

The independent outlet Verstka has identified multiple people with past convictions for violent crimes serving in the Russian Defense Ministry’s Storm Z unit, which contains former inmates from Russian prisons that the ministry recruited following the model first used by the Wagner Group paramilitary cartel. These convicts-turned-soldiers include a man sentenced to 26 years in prison for murdering a 91-year-old woman and previously convicted of rape, an offense that would have disqualified him from joining Wagner Group. Meduza summarizes Verstka’s findings.

Content warning: This story contains descriptions of extreme violence.

In early May, “war correspondents” from several pro-Kremlin media outlets traveled to the occupied part of Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region to visit the positions of Russia’s 71st Guards Motorized Rifle Regiment. The reporters noted that the forward posts were occupied by ex-convicts serving in the regiment’s Storm-Z unit.

According to the state-owned newspaper Arguments and Facts, the unit’s deputy commander is a soldier with the call sign “Tambov” who was serving a sentence in a Mordovian prison before joining the military. (A Telegram post by “war correspondent” Andrey Guselnikov says “Tambov’s” sentence was 26 years, though this has not been independently verified.)

“Tambov” himself told the correspondents that Defense Ministry representatives came to his prison and offered inmates amnesty in exchange for serving in the war. Out of the 373 prisoners who wanted to enlist, he said, 127 were accepted into the army, including himself. “Tambov” was given a pardon, a six-month service contract, a “Defense Ministry employee salary,” and a chance to win “national awards,” he told one reporter. In a separate interview, the former convict said he wouldn’t have joined Wagner Group because its reputation is “not so good at the moment.”

Oleg Panchurin, another deputy commander of the 71st Regiment, said he’s been satisfied with the convicts’ performance. “Their mindset is more militarized than that of draftees,” he said, adding that they have the “fog of killers in their eyes” and that they’re “more pleasant to work with.”

By analyzing social media profiles and court records, Verstka has learned that “Tambov” is a 38-year-old from Russia’s Tambov region named Pavel Alyokhin. In December 2022, Alyokhin was convicted of robbing and murdering a 91-year-old woman.

According to investigators, in January 2022, Alyokhin was working as a taxi driver. After driving the 91-year-old home from the grocery store one night, he helped her carry her things into her apartment, where she then offered him some tea. As the two chatted, Alyokhin learned that the woman lived alone and kept her savings in the apartment. He then proceeded to hit her on the head with a glass bottle before strangling her with a towel, according to court documents. After killing the woman, Alyokhin stole more than 1 million rubles ($11,870), most of which he quickly gambled away. The woman’s body was found two weeks later, and Alyokhin was arrested a week after that.

Prosecutors sentenced Pavel Alyokhin to 26 years in prison, citing his past offenses as aggravating circumstances. Alyokhin had five convictions on his record before the murder, according to his arrest warrant. In December 2008, he was convicted of failing to pay alimony. Four months later, in March 2009, he was convicted on charges of rape and “violent acts resulting in venereal disease transmission.” The following month, in April 2009, he was convicted of robbery, another count of “violent acts resulting in venereal disease transmission,” and intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm. Then, in the summer of 2009, he was convicted of illicit firearms trafficking.

A statement on the Tambov regional investigative committee’s website indicates that in October 2008, then-24-year-old Alyokhin threatened a 36-year-old woman with a knife before beating and raping her on the territory of a concrete factory.

In 2019, Alyokhin was convicted of setting fire to the car out of “personal hostility” towards its owner.

Russian media has previously reported that Wagner Group does not accept people convicted under Articles 131 or 132 of the Russian Criminal Code, which refer to rape and sexual violence. A Wagner Group recruiting site mentions the same restrictions: “Anything related to sexual integrity is disqualifying.”

Oleg Batishchev, a former inmate serving alongside Alyokhin in the Storm Z unit, was convicted of murder in September 2022. In January 2022, according to official records, Batishchev went to visit a former girlfriend at her home. After getting into a fight with the woman’s new boyfriend, Batishchev began hitting him, dealing a total of 21 strikes using his hands, his feet, and a wooden stool. In court, his ex-girlfriend testified that she broke up with him because he had physically assaulted her multiple times while intoxicated.

Olga Romanova, the head of the NGO Russia Behind Bars, told Verstka that since the Russian Defense Ministry began recruiting prison inmates on February 1, nearly 15,000 prisoners have enlisted.

On June 13, the Russian State Duma approved a bill that would grant amnesty to volunteer soldiers who sign contracts with the Defense Ministry during mobilization or periods of martial law. Even under this legislation, however, neither Batishchev nor Alyokhin would qualify for pardons, because it would apply only to minor and medium offenses.

Another bill whose first reading was approved by lawmakers in late May would allow the Defense Ministry to draft prisoners convicted of grave crimes. But this legislation, too, would exclude people convicted of sexual crimes, terrorism, state treason, and certain other crimes.

In November 2022, Vladimir Putin signed into law a bill allowing for the mobilization citizens with unexpunged convictions for grave crimes, with the exception of rapes of minors, terrorism, banditry, espionage, and state treason.

[revatbrix]

Will Wife Get Money After Divorce?

In India, financial support for the wife after divorce can be granted in the form of alimony or maintenance. Whether or not a wife receives money, and how much, depends on various factors like the duration of the marriage, the financial condition of each spouse, and their contribution to the marriage. A divorce lawyer can help navigate these specifics.

What Is Alimony?

Alimony, or spousal support, is a financial payment from one spouse to another post-divorce. In many cases, the husband provides alimony to the wife if she lacks sufficient income to maintain the lifestyle established during the marriage. If both spouses are financially independent, alimony may not be awarded, or the amount may be limited.

Factors Affecting Alimony

A divorce lawyer can explain that alimony isn’t the same in every case. Courts consider factors such as:

Length of Marriage: Longer marriages often mean higher alimony payments.

Income and Financial Standing: If the wife has no income, she may receive higher support, while if she has a stable income, the court may reduce or deny alimony.

Age and Health: Older spouses or those in poor health may be granted more alimony due to their reduced ability to work.

Types of Alimony in India

There are generally two types:

Interim Maintenance: Temporary support provided during divorce proceedings.

Permanent Alimony: Lump-sum or monthly payments given after divorce is finalized.

Conclusion

A divorce lawyer can provide detailed guidance on the eligibility and possible amount of financial support a wife may receive after divorce. Consulting with a lawyer early on helps in understanding rights and creating a strong case for fair support.

[zenithlawyer]

What Role Does a Divorce Lawyer Play in Resolving Alimony Disputes in Toronto?

When going through a divorce, one of the most significant and often contentious issues that couples face is the question of alimony or spousal support. Alimony is financial support paid by one spouse to the other after a divorce, designed to help the lower-earning spouse maintain a reasonable standard of living. However, the process of determining alimony can be complex, especially when both parties have different expectations. This is where the expertise of a Divorce Lawyer in Toronto becomes crucial in resolving these disputes.

Understanding Alimony in Toronto

In Toronto, as in the rest of Ontario, alimony is not automatically granted but is based on the needs of the spouse requesting it and the paying spouse’s ability to pay. Factors such as the length of the marriage, the financial situation of both parties, and the roles each spouse played during the marriage are considered. Alimony can be awarded temporarily during the divorce process or as long-term support after the divorce is finalized.

The Divorce Lawyer’s Role in Alimony Disputes

A Divorce Lawyer in Toronto is essential in navigating the complexities of alimony disputes. They bring both legal expertise and negotiation skills to the table, ensuring that the rights of their clients are protected. Here’s how a divorce lawyer can help resolve alimony disputes:

Assessment of Alimony Eligibility: A divorce lawyer can assess the financial and personal situation of their client to determine if they are entitled to alimony or if they may be required to pay it. They will consider factors such as income, employment status, health, and any other elements that could affect the spousal support decision.

Negotiation and Mediation: Often, disputes over alimony can be settled through negotiation or mediation, avoiding the need for a trial. A divorce lawyer will work to mediate a fair agreement between both spouses, taking into account the financial well-being of both parties and any other relevant circumstances.

Representation in Court: If negotiation or mediation does not lead to an agreement, the lawyer will represent their client in court. They will present evidence and arguments to support their client’s position, whether they are seeking alimony or disputing a claim for it.

Modification and Enforcement: In some cases, the terms of alimony may need to be modified if there is a significant change in circumstances, such as a job loss or a remarriage. A divorce lawyer can assist in filing for a modification or ensuring that existing alimony orders are enforced.

Why You Need a Divorce Lawyer for Alimony Issues

Dealing with alimony disputes can be emotionally and financially draining, but a divorce lawyer provides several key benefits. They offer an objective viewpoint, preventing emotions from clouding judgment, and ensure that the process is handled as efficiently as possible. Additionally, their legal knowledge and experience are crucial in interpreting the intricacies of family law and ensuring a fair outcome.

Whether you are seeking alimony or contesting a request for spousal support, consulting with an experienced Divorce Lawyer in Toronto can make all the difference in achieving a fair and equitable resolution to your alimony dispute.