#AMD Radeon Navi

[technewsadda]

AMD is going to launch a Radeon RX 7650 GRE... to get rid of the Navi 33 chip

https://www.techcommand.uk/amd-is-going-to-launch-a-radeon-rx-7650-gre-to-get-rid-of-the-navi-33-chip/ AMD is going to launch a Radeon RX 7650 GRE... to get rid of the Navi 33 chip - https://www.techcommand.uk/amd-is-going-to-launch-a-radeon-rx-7650-gre-to-get-rid-of-the-navi-33-chip/...

[govindhtech]

AMD Radeon RX 8000 Series: Expected Features And Specs

AMD Radeon RX 8000 Series

After AMD’s new CPUs, GPUs should shine. AMD Radeon RX 8000 GPUs will come in early 2025 to improve on the 7000-series. RDNA 4 may be a mid-range graphics architecture, attracting budget-conscious enthusiasts, according to rumors and leaks.

AMD Radeon RX 8000 Series release date

There are claims that AMD will launch their Radeon RX 8000 series RDNA 4 GPUs at CES 2025 in January 2025 in Q1 2025. AMD’s next-gen GPUs may launch around the same time as Nvidia’s. AMD has historically strategically launched its products to beat competition, but the possibility that they may not produce high-end GPUs this time puts them in separate markets.

- Advertisement -

The Radeon RX 7000 series, AMD’s previous generation, was announced in November 2022, creating a late-year release pattern. AMD may ship the RX 8000 series in late August or early September in Q3 based on this trend. Unfortunately, AMD has not responded.

The Radeon RX 8000 series’ expectation shows AMD’s dedication to GPU innovation. AMD’s faith in the RDNA 4 architecture’s capacity to compete in the GPU market is reflected in the delivery window, which gamers and fans eagerly await.

AMD Gaming GPU roadmap

Although it has been known about for some time, RDNA 4, which is the successor to the Navi 3x architecture that eventually became the RX 7000 series, is expected to be released in 2024.

The specs of the RX 8000 series were leaked

You’ll have to settle for speculations and leaks until AMD announces the latest AMD Radeon RX 8000 GPUs specs. Despite Nvidia’s ambitions, AMD’s first formal presentation at Computex 2024 may reveal more official info.

Memory

Recent disclosures of AMD Radeon RX 8000 GPUs specs have caused controversy. The 8000 series may not have high-end cards, as Kepler on X recently stated that all next-gen RDNA 4 AMD cards will have 18 Gbps GDDR6 RAM. 7900 XTX and 7900 XT have 20Gbps, whereas 7800XT has 19.5Gbps.

GGDR7 commercial production is slated to begin before the end of the year, and the RTX 50 series may launch with 28 Gbps GDDR7 RAM, thus AMD may have missed the mark.

GPU RX 8000 price predictions

RX 8000 series AMD Radeons are predicted to cost more than RX 7000 series. From 2022 to 2023, TSMC raised the price of its 3nm wafer process by 22%, resulting in a $1000 cost differential. When production costs rise, retail prices follow. AMD can only reduce costs by cutting elsewhere, which is difficult in a business where R&D is vital. In software, cost-cutting looks plausible. One example is FSR 3, which was postponed until 2023 and supported just 3-4 games. AMD may be balancing technical investment with product price competitiveness.

Given these dynamics, AMD Radeon RX 8000 GPUs will cost more than their predecessors. The amount of this increase depends on how AMD handles production costs and the competitive situation at release. Paying how much for AMD RX 8000 series?

AMD Radeon RX 8000 series: high-end?

According to multiple sources, the AMD Radeon RX 8000 series may focus on mid-range versions. AMD Radeon has had many layoffs and talent exits, suggesting discontent with RX 7000 and RDNA 3’s management performance. As they move away from competing with Nvidia at the high end, Radeon GPU sales have decreased.

In the high-end segment, AMD has failed to compete with Nvidia despite MCM design, improved process technology, limited power consumption, and FSR 3. RX 7900 XT and 7900 XTX costs had to drop to compete with Nvidia’s RTX 4070 Ti, 4080, and 4090. AMD’s Navi 31 and 32 were further challenged by Nvidia’s RTX 4000 SUPER series, showing AMD’s weaknesses in the high-end GPU market and signaling a shift to the mid-range, where it has had better success.

Can RDNA 4 ray trace?

AMD has traditionally trailed Nvidia in ray tracing performance. They come closer to their competition with each generation, but we don’t think they’ll exceed them. RedGamingTech predicts 25% improvements over the RX 7000 series. Nvidia will likely beat this.

Will RDNA 4 vastly improve RDNA 3?

While RDNA 4 will improve architecture, it may not be as large as some had thought. AMD seems to be catching up on ray tracing, which is good. While RDNA 4 is believed to be a ‘bug fix’ to the current 7000 series (RDNA 3), the main modifications may have to wait until RDNA 5.

Finishing thoughts

AMD’s strategy has changed due to Nvidia’s high-end GPU supremacy. Leaks about AMD’s Radeon RX 8000 release date and move away from high-end are disappointing but not surprising. The RX 7900 XTX’s performance disparity with Nvidia’s 4090 and its struggle against the 4080 show AMD’s top-end market issues.

AMD appears to be focusing on their mid-range market, where they have done well. RDNA 4 architecture will allow AMD to release top mid-range GPUs. AMD’s dedication to providing value and performance to a wide range of consumers is shown by this change. We expect AMD’s Radeon RX 8000 series to redefine mid-range GPU greatness and give appealing solutions to gamers and PC enthusiasts.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[trashexpert-ru]

Radeon RX 7800M превзошла RTX 4070 в тестах 3DMark Time Spy

Radeon RX 7800M превзошла RTX 4070 в тестах 3DMark Time Spy Видеокарта AMD Radeon RX 7800M была протестирована в 3DMark Time Spy и показала результаты на 28% лучше, чем у RTX 4070 для ноутбуков. RX 7800M оборудована GPU Navi 32 с 3840 потоковыми процессорами. Однако, в отличие от десктопной версии, она имеет 192-битную шину памяти вместо 256-битной, поддерживая 12 ГБ или 16 ГБ памяти. AMD выбрала оптимальное решение на 12 ГБ памяти. Карта потребляет 180 Вт питания, что сопоставимо с флагманской моделью RX 7900M.... #Новости_технологий #Компьютеры #IT #ТрешЭксперт #TrashExpert #Высокие_технологии Read the full article

[theclubhero-blog]

GPU AMD Radeon RX 8000 "RDNA 4" tem especificações vazadas

Por Vinicius Torres Oliveira

A AMD submeteu uma de suas novas GPUs Radeon RX 8000 "RDNA 4" ao Geekbench, mostrando o que esperar das próximas placas de vídeo

Uma das GPUs AMD Radeon RX 8000 “RDNA 4” teve suas informações divulgadas no Geekbench, mostrando algumas de suas especificações e como ela se posicionará diante dos demais hardwares da linha.

Ela é descrita como “GFX1201”, o que confirma que o modelo específico usará o SKU Navi 48 – o maior dos dois dies Navi 4X. A placa de vídeo é listada com 28 unidades computacionais (UC) e, levando em conta que o RDNA 3 trazia um motor de sombreamento com unidades duplas, é possível que isso signifique que traga 56 UC no total.

Essa contagem de unidades computacionais da GPU AMD Radeon RX 8000 “RDNA 4” se mostraria entre dois modelos da fabricante – a RX 7700 XT, que foi lançada com 54 UC e a RX 7800 XT, modelo lançado com 60 UC.

Além disso, é listado que a placa de vídeo terá uma velocidade de clock configurada em 2,1 GHz – o que parece baixo em comparação às GPUs RDNA 3 (que atingem entre 2,5 a 2,6 GHz com facilidade), mas é importante ressaltar que esta pode ser apenas uma amostra, uma versão de testes que não representa o estado final do modelo.

Por fim, também é visto que a GPU AMD Radeon RX 8000 “RDNA 4” (GFX1201) é listada com 16 GB de VRAM – similar ao que é visto nas RX 7800 XT e RX 7900 GRE. Isto confirma que usará a interface de bus de 256-bit, mas apesar da informação não foi revelado o tipo de memória que foi utilizado – apesar de vazamentos sugerirem que usarão o GDDR6 em 18 Gbps.

O desempenho da GPU AMD Radeon RX 8000 “RDNA 4” não teve resultados tão positivos assim no benchmark OpenCL, mas como citamos anteriormente, como é uma versão prévia e o chip deve estar passando por testes apenas, isto provavelmente não representa o que será visto em seu lançamento em 2025.

É importante notar que, se os testes já estão ocorrendo com as amostras, a fabricante deve estar analisando os dados para os ajustes necessários – algo que sempre ocorre antes da chegada dos principais hardwares ao mercado e aos consumidores. Isso significa que seu lançamento – de fato – não está tão distante assim.

Possivelmente a AMD mostrará mais detalhes das suas GPUs Radeon RX 8000 “RDNA 4” durante a CES 2025. No entanto, a concorrência também está de olho no evento e as placas de vídeo da NVIDIA “GeForce RTX 50” também estão previstas para marcarem presença por lá.

[ujjinatd]

Se detecta la tarjeta gráfica AMD Radeon RX 8000 'RDNA 4' con GPU Navi 48 y 16 GB de memoria Algo que esperar: Team Red lanzará ... https://ujjina.com/se-detecta-la-tarjeta-grafica-amd-radeon-rx-8000-rdna-4-con-gpu-navi-48-y-16-gb-de-memoria/?feed_id=740713&_unique_id=66ccaddc6b0c1

[whiteguyswearinoculusrifts]

A AMD está trabalhando em uma GPU RDNA 3 exclusiva da China, conhecida uma vez que Radeon RX 7900 GRE, que será baseada no chip Navi 31. Espera-se que a GPU AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16 GB seja um lançamento regional, reduzindo a GPU Navi 31 A ITHome (via Videocardz) relata que a AMD deve lançar a novidade Radeon RX 7900 GRE (Golden Rabbit Edition) de convénio com as festividades chinesas. Oriente lançamento é semelhante ao que vimos em 2020, quando a AMD lançou a edição RX 590 GME. Normalmente, esse lançamento de GPU é uma versão simplificada da GPU original. Oriente é um caso semelhante cá, pois é relatado que o RX 7900 GRE será fundamentado em uma versão reduzida da GPU Navi 31. O AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE contará com uma capacidade de 16 GB de VRAM rodando em um barramento de memória de 256 bits e uma resenha reduzida de CU (Unidade de Computação) que está entre 80-84 CUs. Em contraste com o RX 7900 XT, que possui 20 GB de memória GDDR6 de 320 bits, podemos colocar o próximo RX 7900 GRE em qualquer lugar no meio. A AMD ainda não anunciou oficialmente a versão Radeon RX 7900 GRE, embora seja necessário observar que leste é um lançamento regional. Esses lançamentos são um esforço para atrair o interesse do consumidor, mormente nos mercados chineses Oriente lançamento expressa solidariedade com um determinado evento, acabando por gerar receita para a empresa por meio da venda de GPUs, mas isso também significa que acabaria sendo uma edição limitada e um cartão muito vasqueiro. Vimos essa GPU brotar com bancos de dados ao lado das primeiras amostras de CPU do Zen 5. A data de lançamento e o preço do próximo AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE ainda não estão certos, mas espera-se que seja subordinado à marca de 5.699 yuans/US$ 790. O preço está próximo do RX 7900 XT e também devido ao seu posicionamento restringido. Porquê é um cartão com foco na China, podemos vê-lo em uma pintura totalmente vermelha. Podemos esperar que mais detalhes sejam revelados nos próximos dias. AMD Radeon RX 7000 RDNA 3 GPU Lineup "Rumores": Placa de vídeoAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTAMD Radeon RX 7900 GREAMD Radeon RX 7800 XTAMD Radeon RX 7700 XTAMD Radeon RX 7600 XTAMD Radeon RX 7600 GPUNavi 31XTXNavi 31XTEnvia 31 LE?Navi 31 ?Navi 32 ?Navi 32 ?Navi 33 XL Nó do processo5nm+6nm5nm+6nm5nm+6nm5nm+6nm5nm+6nm5nm+6nm6 nm Tamanho da matriz300mm2 (Unicamente GCD)522mm2 (com MCDs)300mm2 (Unicamente GCD)522mm2 (com MCDs)300mm2 (Unicamente GCD)522mm2 (com MCDs)300mm2 (Unicamente GCD)522mm2 (com MCDs)TBDTBD204mm2 Transistores58 bilhões58 bilhões58 bilhões58 bilhõesTBDTBD13,3 bilhões GPU WGP484240-4230?24?20?16 Processadores de fluxo614453765120-53763840?3072?2560?2048 TMUs/ROPs384/192384/192TBDTBDTBDTBD128/32 relógio do jogo2,3 GHz2,0 GHzTBDTBDTBDTBD2,2 GHz Aumente o Relógio2,5 GHz2,4 GHzTBDTBDTBDTBD2,6 GHz FP32 TFLOPs61 TFLOPs52 TFLOPs50 TFLOPsTBDTBDTBD22 TFLOPs Tamanho da memória24GB GDDR620GB GDDR616 GB GDDR616GB GDDR6?12GB GDDR6?8GB GDDR6?8 GB GDDR6 Cache Infinito96 MB80 MB48 MB60MB?48MB?40MB?32 MB barramento de memória384 bits320 bits256 bits256 bits192 bits128 bits128 bits Relógio de memória20 Gbps20 Gbps20 Gbps20 Gbps20 Gbps20 Gbps18 Gbps largura de orquestra960 GB/s800 GB/s640 GB/s640 GB/s480 GB/s320 GB/s288 GB/s Largura de orquestra efetiva3,5 TB/s3,5 TB/sTBDTBDTBDTBD476,9 GB/s TBP355 W315W275-300 W~255W~225W175 W165 W Interface PCIePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8 PreçoUS$ 999US$ 899US$ 799TBDTBDTBDUS$ 269 Lançardezembro de 2022dezembro de 2022TBDTBDTBDTBDmaio de 2023 Manadeira da notícia: ITHome Compartilhe esta história Facebook Twitter

[gamunity]

اعلنت AMD عن بطاقة الرسومات Radeon RX 7600 XT بسعر 329 دولار

تم الاعلان رسميا عن بطاقة الرسومات Radeon RX 7600 XT من AMD. بالنسبة للمواصفات ستكون لها نفس وحدة معالجة الرسوميات Navi 33 مثل Radeon RX 7600، فإن الاختلاف الرئيسي يكمن في قسم الـ “VRAM”. يستخدم الطراز 7600 بالفعل مجموعة Navi 33 الكاملة المكونة من 32 وحدة معالجة (CUs)، ولن تتغير واجهة الذاكرة التي هي 128-بت، مما يترك طريقين فقط لتحسين الأداء والميزات: المزيد من الذاكرة الـ “VRAM” و سرعة معالج…

[jhuyt674]

The Reds are going against Nvidia with a 16GB RX 7600 XT graphics card

With the 16 GB Radeon RX 7600 XT graphics card, AMD plans to renew its new generation graphics family.

Advertising

AMD's latest graphics card named Radeon RX 7600 XT has been spotted in the EEC database. This graphics card has 16 GB of GDDR6 graphics memory, which is twice the graphics memory of Radeon RX 7600.

Radeon RX 7600 XT is expected to be one of the most important products of the red team with RDNA 3 architecture. This product is positioned higher than the Radeon RX 7600 graphics card , which was introduced in the middle of this year.

The price of the AMD RX 7600 graphics card is around $269; While it is said that the price of RX 7600 XT graphics card will be around 300 dollars.

In the EEC database information that one of the whistleblowers published in X, the release time of AMD's new graphics card is not clear; But the rumors say that the new product of the red team will probably be released in January 2024 (December and Bahman).Related articles

Speculations point to the RX 7600 XT using the Navi 33 chip, which is coupled with higher clock speeds and graphics memory, and offers a 128-bit bus width.

It is possible that AMD's new graphics card will use a more powerful Navi 32 chip with more cores and bus width (up to 256 bits). Radeon RX 7600 XT will be a competitor for Nvidia's RTX 4060 Ti graphics card due to its price and possible specifications

[phonemantra-blog]

And it will cost more than $600 In addition to the monstrous Ryzen Threadripper 7000 processors, AMD also introduced the professional Radeon PRO W7700 video card.  [caption id="attachment_72131" align="aligncenter" width="780"] AMD[/caption] More precisely, the company mentioned such a model and a full announcement will take place sometime later. But it is already known that the new product will receive 16 GB of memory, which is quite normal for graphics accelerators of this class.   AMD is preparing a new video card for professionals. Judging by the name, the heart of the new product should be the Navi 32 GPU, but the configuration is still unknown. If it is identical to that of the RX 7700 XT, then we are talking about 3456 stream processors, and the amount of memory probably indicates the use of a 256-bit bus.  The Radeon PRO W7800 with 32 GB of memory costs $2,500, and the Radeon PRO W7600 with 8 GB is priced at $600, so the new product will be located somewhere between them, probably closer to the first. 

[techvandaag]

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT en 7800 XT officieel: midrange-RDNA 3 vanaf €489

AMD heeft de Radeon RX 7700 XT en 7800 XT geïntroduceerd tijdens de Gamescom-beurs. Beide zijn gebaseerd op Navi 32, een chiplet-gebaseerde gpu waarbij een graphics compute-die wordt gecombineerd met maximaal vier memory cache-dies. De RDNA 3-middenklassers krijgen een adviesprijs van respectievelijk 489 en 549 euro en zullen net zoals Starfield vanaf 6 september beschikbaar zijn. De RX 7800 XT beschikt over 60 compute units, gevolgd door 16 GB gddr6-geheugen met een 256-bit bus en een snelh... http://dlvr.it/Sv9nsx

[dztechs]

مقارنة بين RX 7900 XTX و RX 7900 XT من AMD Radeon: ما هي الاختلافات؟

في 13 ديسمبر 2022 ، أصدرت AMD كل من بطاقات الرسومات Radeon RX 7900 XTX و Radeon 7900 XT كنموذجين من الدرجة المُتقدمة من تشكيلة Navi 31 GPU المُرتقبة للغاية. استنادًا إلى معمارية RDNA 3 الأحدث من الشركة ، تشترك كل من بطاقات الرسومات في اصطلاح تسمية ومجموعة ميزات مُماثلة مع تقديم منافسة شديدة ضد GeForce RTX 4080 من Nvidia. مع ذلك ، كيف يُمكن مقارنة Radeon RX 7900 XTX بمُتغير XT من حيث المواصفات والأداء والقيمة الإجمالية؟ هيا نكتشف! تحقق من مقارنة بين بطاقات الرسومات من AMD و NVIDIA على Linux: أيهما يجب أن تستخدم؟ Read the full article

[techrookies]

Would Apple launch an AMD-powered Mac Pro in 2023? That would be Epyc

It seems like we’re in the midst of something exciting for AMD when it comes to the creative market. Team Red seems to have gotten a bit of its mojo back after having launched a pair of new graphic cards for workstations (the Navi-3 infused W7900 and the W7800), GPUs may be the precursors to the followup of the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo, which can be found in the Apple Mac Pro and pairs two GPU on…

[govindhtech]

Discovering the Top 5 Nvidia GPUs in 20 Years!

Here are the top 5 Nvidia GPUs after 20 years

Top Team Green GPUs.

Nvidia, founded 1993, rarely loses. The quality of its products has bankrupted and driven out many competitors. It has promoted deep learning and AI hardware and made many of the best graphics cards. Still, its latest cards’ expensive RTX 40-series GPUs and questionable Frame Generation features are flaws.

Let’s forget the sad present and remember Nvidia’s exciting past. Since GeForce was founded 24 years ago, Nvidia has made many great GPUs, most of which can compete with AMD’s. Think these are Top 5 Nvidia GPUs, including families and cards.

1. RTX 3060

RTX 30-series looked promising in 2020. Architecture, ray tracing, tensor cores, raw performance, and price were better. Prices were far below expectations. A 30-series GPU or any graphics card was rare near MSRP.

After the 30-series launched in late 2020, Nvidia added lower-performance models. The midrange was crucial because the RTX 20-series’ 2060 and 2060 Super weren’t good GTX 1060 successors. Nvidia didn’t have to work hard on a new Top 5 Nvidia GPUs in 2021 because anyone could buy a pulse GPU, but the RTX 3060 surprised everyone.

Midrange Not all Nvidia products are good, but the RTX 3060 was. Double the VRAM (12GB) of the RTX 2060, it performed better. It had more VRAM than 10GB RTX 3080.

That AMD’s midrange cards, usually powerful, were weak was even more surprising. The RX 6600 and 6600 XT had decent horsepower but 8GB VRAM, FSR 1.0 upscaling instead of DLSS, and came out months later. VRAM capacity was usually better for AMD than the 30-series, except for Navi 23 cards.

Even after Nvidia’s first “self-owned” attempt to lock out Ethereum mining, the RTX 3060 had a GPU shortage. The shortage ended in 2022, making the 3060 a cheap GPU. The 6600 and 6600 XT dropped below $300, while the 3060 never reached $329. FSR 2.0’s quality and performance improvements made it more competitive with DLSS, reducing the 3060’s advantage.

Nvidia’s midrange GPU RTX 3060 remains strong. Great card that challenged AMD despite pricing and availability issues. The 30-series was usually too expensive or had too little VRAM, but this was the best. Unfortunately, the RTX 4060 undid most of that progress.

2.GTX 680

Nvidia rarely makes major mistakes, but Fermi was one. Fermi, introduced in the GTX 480 in mid-2010, only improved performance over the 200-series and consumed tons of power, not what Nvidia needed. Despite the dire situation, Nvidia released a second Fermi and GTX 500-series before 2010, improving product efficiency.

Fermi likely changed Nvidia’s strategy. Throughout the 2000s, Nvidia trailed Radeon (ATI and then AMD) in nodes. Newer nodes were more expensive and had “teething pains.” but had better efficiency, performance, and density. By the mid-2000s, Nvidia’s strategy was to make big Top 5 Nvidia GPUs on older nodes, typically placing GeForce first.

After the traumatic Fermi experience, Nvidia joined AMD at 28nm in early 2012. The first 28nm GPU, Kepler, differed from Fermi and previous architectures. The latest process made its largest version lean at just under 300mm2 and efficient. Nvidia and AMD flagships competed differently in 2012.

Nvidia released the Kepler-powered GTX 680 three months after AMD released the HD 7970. AMD’s HD 4000- and 5000-series GPUs were great, but the 680 was faster, more efficient, and smaller than the 7970. Nvidia only led these metrics slightly, but it led all three, which was rare or unprecedented.

Nvidia lost performance to the HD 7970 GHz Edition and better AMD drivers, but it led power and area efficiency. AMD faced another Kepler revision, which powered the GTX 700-series and forced the launch of a hot and power-hungry Radeon R9 290X. Fermi-like R9 290X beat GTX 780, but GTX 780 Ti reclaimed the title.

GTX 680 isn’t remembered, but it should be. AMD’s strategy helped Nvidia beat Fermi. Perhaps a better Top 5 Nvidia GPUs did the same thing and overshadowed it.

3. GTX 980

GeForce and Radeon battled for generations from the early 2000s to the early 2010s. Nvidia won most of the time, but ATI (later AMD) was close. One side was defeated only when ATI’s Radeon 9700 Pro defeated Nvidia’s GeForce 4 Ti 4600. Nvidia nearly repeated this scenario several times.

The stars must align for Nvidia by mid-2010s. Chipmakers like Nvidia and AMD’s GPU partner TSMC struggled to move beyond 28nm. Nvidia could make big Nvidia GPUs on old nodes without AMD responding with a new node. Top 5 Nvidia GPUs AMD was near bankruptcy, but Nvidia had more resources.

The perfect storm occurred when these two factors coincided. Kepler did well in the GTX 600- and 700-series, but Maxwell in the GTX 900-series (and GTX 750 Ti) was different. From 28nm, performance, power efficiency, and density improved.

The 980 was 15% faster, twice as efficient as the 290X, and cut 40mm2 of die area. The 980 was 40% more efficient, 10% faster, and 160mm2 smaller than the 780 Ti.

Though not as impressive as the Radeon 9700 Pro, this was a huge win. Like AMD’s HD 5870 attack on Nvidia. AMD had no Nvidia GPUs deterrent to Nvidia. AMD’s Radeon 200-series barely survived 2014.

AMD tried again in 2015, but only high-end. From low to high midrange, it refreshed the Radeon 200-series as the 300-series and used its new Fury lineup for the top. With a larger Maxwell GPU, Nvidia’s GTX 980 Ti defeated AMD’s R9 Fury X. The 980 Ti was preferable to the 4GB Fury X (a decent card) because it had 6GB of memory.

Though Nvidia won, the GTX 900-series changed gaming graphics cards forever. The Fury X was AMD’s last competitive flagship until the 2020 RX 6900 XT because AMD stopped making them every generation. AMD makes flagship Nvidia GPUs again (knock on wood), but Maxwell crippled Radeon for years.

4.8800 GTX

Modern graphics cards emerged in the early 2000s as Nvidia and ATI improved. Nvidia’s GeForce 256 introduced hardware-accelerated transform and lighting, while ATI’s Radeon 9700 Pro showed GPUs should be big and have more computational hardware. After losing big to the 9700 Pro in 2002, Nvidia made bigger and better GPUs.

Though ATI started the arms race, Nvidia was determined to win. In late 2006, Nvidia and ATI had GPUs as large as 300mm2, but Nvidia’s Tesla architecture scaled to nearly 500mm2 with the G80 chip. That size is typical for a flagship Nvidia GPUs today, but not then.

Tesla’s GeForce 8800 GTX hit AMD in late 2006 like the Radeon 9700 Pro did Nvidia four years earlier. Size helped the 8800 GTX beat ATI’s flagship Radeon X1950 XTX, which was almost 150mm2 smaller. Because it was fast and power hungry, the 8800 GTX normalized GPUs with 150+ watt TDPs, even though it seems quaint now.

BFGPU creator ATI couldn’t compete with 8800 GTX. HD 2000-series, at 420mm2, couldn’t compete with G80 chip and Tesla architecture. ATI shifted to smaller, more efficient Nvidia GPUs with higher performance density. The HD 3000-series flagship HD 3870 was surprisingly small at just under 200mm2, and the HD 4000- and 5000-series followed with similar die sizes.

Nvidia now replaces powerfu lNvidia GPUs with even more powerful ones to show AMD who’s boss, but not then. The Tesla architecture was so good that Nvidia used it again for the GeForce GTX 9000 series, a faster 8000 series. Despite being almost half the price of the 8800 GTX, the 9800 GTX was boring.

The 8800 GTX’s age belies its modernity. It had two 6-pin power connectors, an aluminum-finned cooler, and a high-end GPU die size. Despite being a modern GPU, it only supported DirectX 10, which didn’t survive.

5. GTX 1080 Ti

The Nvidia GTX 600-, 700-, and 900-series 28nm GPUs were hot. Every win over AMD’s cards was bigger. After the Fury X, AMD stopped making flagship Nvidia GPUs, leaving Nvidia alone for the next generation.

AMD left as TSMC’s 16nm node entered volume production. AMD used GlobalFoundries, which licensed Samsung’s 14nm, to make graphics cards because TSMC was too expensive. Note that TSMC’s 16nm node was better.

Despite its great GTX 900-series architecture, Nvidia went 28nm to 16nm. Nvidia outperformed AMD in process nodes for the first time in a while with TSMC’s 16nm. A shrunken Maxwell, the 16nm Pascal architecture introduced few new features, mostly for VR, which Nvidia (and AMD) were disappointed by. Only Rise of the Tomb Raider used Voxel Ambient Occlusion (VXAO), but it improved ray tracing.

GTX 10-series shrank without losing power. The 2016 flagship GPU GTX 1080 outperformed the GTX 980’s 700-series improvements. The 1080 was 30% faster, twice as efficient, and half the size of the 980 Ti. Pascal’s 16nm shrink optimized Maxwell after 28nm.

AMD’s old R9 Fury X, regular R9 Fury, and compact R9 Nano competed with the GTX 1080 and 1070 in 2014. Instead, AMD introduced the RX 400 series, starting with the 480. Nvidia’s GTX 1060 was good and efficient like the 1080. AMD’s specialty was midrange GPUs, and driver updates and the 480’s 2GB VRAM kept it competitive.

The GTX 1080 won 2016 and 2017 when AMD’s RX Vega flagship GPUs debuted. AMD performed similarly to the 1080 and 1070 but was less efficient. The GTX 1080 Ti, a larger Pascal GPU, got ahead of AMD three months earlier. Fury X mostly matched the 980 Ti, but Vega 64 couldn’t match the 1080.

GTX 10-series performance, efficiency, and price are remembered. Since the RTX 20-, 30-, and 40-series lack the 10-series’ diverse product stack, it may be Nvidia’s last great graphics card series. Nvidia released good $100 GTX 1050 and $700 GTX 1080 models over time. The GTX 10-series coincided with peak PC gaming.

GeForce RTX 4090

They debated including the GeForce RTX 4090, which is absent from this list. Great hardware and fast GPU, but complicated. They concluded with an honorable/dishonorable mention. The GPUs were best and worst.

Like the 980 Ti and 1080 Ti, the 4090 is the fastest gaming GPU. The 4090 outperforms AMD’s RX 7900 XTX in ray tracing and DLSS over FSR despite having similar horsepower. Though smaller than the 1080 Ti’s, the 4090’s performance lead is impressive.

The 4090’s two main drawbacks are noticeable. The 4090 uses the problematic 12VHPWR connector and consumes over 400 watts, making power issues worse. The power plug has been discontinued and revised, but many 4090 cards made before the redesign are unaffected. Fermi didn’t burn, so 4090 was likely a disaster.

PC gaming has become more expensive in the past five years, as shown by the 4090. At $1,600, it’s as expensive as a good gaming PC. The 3090 was designed as a Titan-class luxury GPU, but the 4090 merely follows it in price. The 3080 was slower than the 3090, but the 4080 was much slower.

A direct successor to the 980 Ti and 1080 Ti is unlikely due to the 4090’s high price. Launched at $649 and $699, the 980 Ti and 1080 Ti were affordable. The cheapest 4090s cost $2,000 or more, so its ridiculous $1,599 MSRP is unattainable.

Despite its strengths, the RTX 4090 is not Nvidia’s best GPU. Not as good as its predecessors. Instead of melting connectors and costing $1,000, it could have been the next GTX 1080 Ti. They await a champion.

Read more on Govindhtech.com

[trashexpert-ru]

В сети появилось описание графического процессора AMD Navi 44 XL

В сети появилось описание графического процессора AMD Navi 44 XL Согласно последней информации, видеокарты серии AMD Radeon RX 8000 на архитектуре RDNA 4 получат сегментацию моделей, которая напоминает линейку RX 5000 на RDNA 1. Ставка будет делаться на массовый сегмент рынка.... #Новости_технологий #Компьютеры #IT #ТрешЭксперт #TrashExpert #Высокие_технологии Read the full article

[theclubhero-blog]

CES 2025: AMD pode revelar nova linha de GPUs Radeon RX 8000

Por Vinicius Torres Oliveira

Tudo é rumor, mas o salto geracional está garantido

A AMD pode estar preparando alguns anúncios bombásticos para a CES 2025, É que, segundo alguns vazamentos sobre os próximos planos da gigante, a empresa pretende mostra a Radeon RX 8000, a sua nova linha de GPUs de alto desempenho, no maior evento de tecnologias do mundo.

A origem do vazamento é extra-oficial e veio do usuário Kepler, da rede social X (antigo Twitter). O usuário é conhecido por adiantar novidades sobre o universo dos hardwares de ponta. E, desta vez, respondendo a uma sequência de questionamentos, ele garante as Radeon RX 8000 (arquitetura RDNA 4) serão mostradas na CES do ano que vem.

Radeon RX 8000: muitos mistérios

Até o momento, pouco realmente se sabe sobre as Radeon RX 8000. A AMD com certeza está guardando tudo a sete chaves até a hora da revelação. Enquanto isso não acontece, as únicas informações que temos mais relevantes é que essa nova linha de GPUs virá em dois modelos (nomes não oficiais):

Navi 48: GPUs mais avançadas

Navi 44: GPUs de entrada / intermediárias

A CES 2025 já tem data para acontecer: de 7 a 10 de janeiro do ano que vem, em Las Vegas (EUA). Até lá, pode ter certeza que muitos outros rumores e possíveis anúncios de grandes marcas, incluindo as big techs, entrarão na onda das novidades antecipadas. E muita coisa pode (ou não) ser confirmada.

[lauranews]

The mystery of massive GPU cracking in Radeon RX 6000 video cards has been solved - miners and a negligent seller are involved in the case.

Earlier, a story spread on the Web that AMD Radeon RX 6000 video cards (models on the Navi 21 GPU) began to fail en masse. At the same time, it was about critical physical damage to the cards - the silicon graphics processor literally split into several parts. Some of these video cards ended up in the German workshop KrisFix. After dozens of hours of research and testing, experts still found the source of the problem… Detail: https://bitcoingrandee.com/posts/282 NEWS. Watch video https://www.tiktok.com/@clubilim/video/7190940878301695234?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7188171272047265285 NEWS