#ALL INDIA TRINAMOOL CONGRESS

[tpdfindia]

[jaspreetynr]

तीन टांके, मस्तिष्क आघात… बेहोश हुई ममता बनर्जी का क्या हुआ - डॉक्टर क्या कहते हैं?!ई. निवेदा

Mamata Banerjee • West Bengal • All India Trinamool Congress आज के दौर में हमें घरों में डोज लोड करते रहना पड़ता है. इसमें दिल के दौरे के दौरान दर्द से राहत के लिए रोगियों क�� दी जाने वाली जीवनरक्षक दवाएं शामिल हैं। पश्चिम बंगाल की मुख्यमंत्री ममता बनर्जी की माथे पर चोट वाली तस्वीरों से हड़कंप मच गया है. एसएसकेएम अस्पताल में उनका इलाज किया गया और घर भेज दिया गया. इस बारे में एसएसकेएम अस्पताल के…

[head-post]

Modi claims victory in Indian general election, but falling support pushes for coalition

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced his alliance’s victory in the Indian general election, according to AP News.

He claimed a mandate to push his programme, although his party lost ground to a stronger-than-expected opposition. It opposed his controversial economic course and polarising policies.

Today’s victory is the victory of the world’s largest democracy.

Modi told his party’s headquarters on Tuesday that Indian voters had “shown immense faith” in both his party and his National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition.

Official results from the Indian Election Commission on Wednesday showed that the NDA won 294 seats. This is more than the 272 seats needed to win a majority, but still far less than expected. For the first time since its Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014, it did not secure a majority on its own. In 2019, it managed to win a record 303 seats.

The Congress Party won 99 seats, improving its result from 52 in the 2019 elections. The Samajwadi Party also secured 37 seats in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh, a major disappointment for the BJP. Meanwhile, the All India Trinamool Congress won 29 seats in the state of West Bengal and the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam gained 22 seats in the southern state of Tamil Nadu.

The opposition INDIA coalition won a total of 232 seats. Milan Vaishnav, director of the South Asia Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, stated:

At the very least, the result pricks the bubble Prime Minister Modi’s authority. He made this election about himself. Today, he is just another politician, cut to size by the people.

Read more HERE

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 24th October. The possibility of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee resigning from her position is a subject that has sparked many discussions across political circles, both within the state and outside it. While some may see her resignation as a momentous political shift, a closer analysis reveals that it might not necessarily lead to the relief that many anticipate. In fact, Mamata Banerjee’s resignation might only pave the way for greater instability and a continuation of the political challenges that have long plagued West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee: A Political Titan of West Bengal Mamata Banerjee, the leader of the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC), has been a towering figure in West Bengal politics for over a decade. Her rise to power in 2011 ended the long-standing dominance of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M) and heralded a new era in the state’s political landscape. Known for her populist policies, grassroots appeal, and often polarizing leadership style, she has firmly entrenched herself in the political framework of West Bengal. However, in recent years, Banerjee’s leadership has been marred by accusations of corruption, authoritarianism, and the mishandling of several key issues, including law and order. Critics argue that her government’s tolerance of violence, coupled with the rise of local strongmen, has created an atmosphere of fear and oppression for ordinary citizens. As a result, there is growing sentiment among some sections of the population that her resignation could be the first step toward a brighter future for the state. Resignation vs. Electoral Defeat: The Key Difference While many might view Mamata Banerjee’s resignation as a potential solution to West Bengal’s problems, it’s important to understand that a resignation would not necessarily dismantle the political machinery she has built. A resignation does not indicate a loss of political power; it is simply a change of leadership, leaving the door open for another figure from within her party, or even more dangerous forces, to take her place. In contrast, a clear and convincing electoral defeat would dismantle the very structure that supports her power, leading to more substantial change. If Mamata Banerjee were to resign, the likelihood of another leader, possibly more authoritarian or opportunistic, rising to power is high. West Bengal’s political landscape is fraught with factionalism and patronage networks, and a sudden leadership change could exacerbate these divisions. This could lead to greater instability and a period of political turbulence that might make life even more difficult for the people of West Bengal. The Danger of Successors: From Bad to Worse? One of the most significant concerns regarding Mamata Banerjee’s resignation is the question of who would replace her. Given the current political scenario in West Bengal, it is highly probable that her successor could be an equally, if not more, problematic figure. Mamata Banerjee’s administration has been accused of fostering a culture of political violence and cronyism, and any potential successor would likely emerge from this same system. The reference to the possibility of “more Sandeskali” or “more Shahajahan Sheik” points to the rise of local power brokers and strongmen under Banerjee’s regime. These figures, often associated with acts of lawlessness and intimidation, thrive in an environment of weak governance and political patronage. A new leader, particularly one from within the same political framework, could continue to rely on such actors to maintain control, thus perpetuating the very issues that have caused so much frustration in the state. Furthermore, a leadership vacuum could create opportunities for more dangerous or radical elements to exploit the situation, further destabilizing the region. Mamata Banerjee’s resignation, therefore, might not lead to a democratic renewal but rather a continuation of West Bengal’s political dysfunction under a different name.

Mamata’s Electoral Defeat: A Path to Lasting Change? The alternative to Mamata Banerjee’s resignation, and arguably a more effective route to long-term improvement in West Bengal, is her decisive defeat in an election. Electoral defeat would mark the end of the political system that has supported her and open the door for new administrative forces to take over. It would also signal a clear mandate from the people of West Bengal for change, potentially ushering in a new era of governance. In the event of her electoral defeat, the TMC’s political network, which has been deeply rooted in every aspect of West Bengal’s administration, would likely lose its grip on power. A new government, untainted by the influence of Banerjee’s political machinery, could institute reforms aimed at improving governance, restoring law and order, and reducing the influence of political strongmen. Additionally, a peaceful transfer of power through elections would provide legitimacy to the incoming administration, reducing the chances of instability and ensuring a smoother transition. This would bring a sense of relief not only to the people of West Bengal but also to those watching from outside the state, as it would mark the end of a turbulent political chapter and the beginning of a new one. The Risk of Further Deterioration Post-Resignation It is important to recognize that Mamata Banerjee’s resignation without a broader political upheaval would leave the structures of her rule intact. The political patronage, the strongmen, and the entrenched networks of power would remain, and a new leader would likely inherit these systems. The very issues that have made life difficult for many in West Bengal, including political violence and poor governance, could worsen under a new administration that lacks the mandate or authority to enact meaningful change. There is also the risk that Banerjee’s resignation could embolden more radical or opportunistic forces within her party or among her political opponents. This could lead to a power struggle, further destabilizing the state and making it even harder for any meaningful reform to take place. In this scenario, the people of West Bengal could find themselves living through even more difficult times, with no clear end in sight. Conclusion: Resignation Is Not the Solution Mamata Banerjee’s resignation alone is unlikely to bring about the kind of political and social change that West Bengal needs. While many may hope for her departure, it is crucial to understand that a mere change in leadership does not guarantee a shift in the entrenched systems of power and patronage that have defined her administration. True change can only come through a decisive electoral defeat, where the people of West Bengal, through their votes, dismantle the structures of power that have caused so much frustration. This would pave the way for a new administration that can bring relief to the people and restore faith in governance. Thus, while Mamata’s resignation may appear to some as a quick fix, it would likely only replace one problematic leader with another, leaving the root causes of West Bengal’s challenges unaddressed. Real change will only come when the people are able to vote for a new set of leaders who can rebuild the state’s institutions and restore accountability to the political process. It is clear that West Bengal’s future lies in the hands of its people. While Mamata Banerjee’s resignation might seem like a significant event, it is ultimately through democratic processes that true progress can be made. The power of the vote is the most effective tool in dismantling entrenched political systems, and the people of West Bengal must exercise this power judiciously. In the end, it is not the resignation of one leader that will bring about change, but the collective will of the people to elect leaders who are capable of guiding West Bengal toward a more prosperous and stable future.   The post Mamata Banerjee’s Resignation:

A Quick Fix or a Path to Deeper Chaos in West Bengal? appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[news365times]

[ad_1] Paromita Das GG News Bureau New Delhi, 24th October. The possibility of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee resigning from her position is a subject that has sparked many discussions across political circles, both within the state and outside it. While some may see her resignation as a momentous political shift, a closer analysis reveals that it might not necessarily lead to the relief that many anticipate. In fact, Mamata Banerjee’s resignation might only pave the way for greater instability and a continuation of the political challenges that have long plagued West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee: A Political Titan of West Bengal Mamata Banerjee, the leader of the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC), has been a towering figure in West Bengal politics for over a decade. Her rise to power in 2011 ended the long-standing dominance of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M) and heralded a new era in the state’s political landscape. Known for her populist policies, grassroots appeal, and often polarizing leadership style, she has firmly entrenched herself in the political framework of West Bengal. However, in recent years, Banerjee’s leadership has been marred by accusations of corruption, authoritarianism, and the mishandling of several key issues, including law and order. Critics argue that her government’s tolerance of violence, coupled with the rise of local strongmen, has created an atmosphere of fear and oppression for ordinary citizens. As a result, there is growing sentiment among some sections of the population that her resignation could be the first step toward a brighter future for the state. Resignation vs. Electoral Defeat: The Key Difference While many might view Mamata Banerjee’s resignation as a potential solution to West Bengal’s problems, it’s important to understand that a resignation would not necessarily dismantle the political machinery she has built. A resignation does not indicate a loss of political power; it is simply a change of leadership, leaving the door open for another figure from within her party, or even more dangerous forces, to take her place. In contrast, a clear and convincing electoral defeat would dismantle the very structure that supports her power, leading to more substantial change. If Mamata Banerjee were to resign, the likelihood of another leader, possibly more authoritarian or opportunistic, rising to power is high. West Bengal’s political landscape is fraught with factionalism and patronage networks, and a sudden leadership change could exacerbate these divisions. This could lead to greater instability and a period of political turbulence that might make life even more difficult for the people of West Bengal. The Danger of Successors: From Bad to Worse? One of the most significant concerns regarding Mamata Banerjee’s resignation is the question of who would replace her. Given the current political scenario in West Bengal, it is highly probable that her successor could be an equally, if not more, problematic figure. Mamata Banerjee’s administration has been accused of fostering a culture of political violence and cronyism, and any potential successor would likely emerge from this same system. The reference to the possibility of “more Sandeskali” or “more Shahajahan Sheik” points to the rise of local power brokers and strongmen under Banerjee’s regime. These figures, often associated with acts of lawlessness and intimidation, thrive in an environment of weak governance and political patronage. A new leader, particularly one from within the same political framework, could continue to rely on such actors to maintain control, thus perpetuating the very issues that have caused so much frustration in the state. Furthermore, a leadership vacuum could create opportunities for more dangerous or radical elements to exploit the situation, further destabilizing the region. Mamata Banerjee’s resignation, therefore, might not lead to a democratic renewal but rather a continuation of West Bengal’s political dysfunction under a different name.

Mamata’s Electoral Defeat: A Path to Lasting Change? The alternative to Mamata Banerjee’s resignation, and arguably a more effective route to long-term improvement in West Bengal, is her decisive defeat in an election. Electoral defeat would mark the end of the political system that has supported her and open the door for new administrative forces to take over. It would also signal a clear mandate from the people of West Bengal for change, potentially ushering in a new era of governance. In the event of her electoral defeat, the TMC’s political network, which has been deeply rooted in every aspect of West Bengal’s administration, would likely lose its grip on power. A new government, untainted by the influence of Banerjee’s political machinery, could institute reforms aimed at improving governance, restoring law and order, and reducing the influence of political strongmen. Additionally, a peaceful transfer of power through elections would provide legitimacy to the incoming administration, reducing the chances of instability and ensuring a smoother transition. This would bring a sense of relief not only to the people of West Bengal but also to those watching from outside the state, as it would mark the end of a turbulent political chapter and the beginning of a new one. The Risk of Further Deterioration Post-Resignation It is important to recognize that Mamata Banerjee’s resignation without a broader political upheaval would leave the structures of her rule intact. The political patronage, the strongmen, and the entrenched networks of power would remain, and a new leader would likely inherit these systems. The very issues that have made life difficult for many in West Bengal, including political violence and poor governance, could worsen under a new administration that lacks the mandate or authority to enact meaningful change. There is also the risk that Banerjee’s resignation could embolden more radical or opportunistic forces within her party or among her political opponents. This could lead to a power struggle, further destabilizing the state and making it even harder for any meaningful reform to take place. In this scenario, the people of West Bengal could find themselves living through even more difficult times, with no clear end in sight. Conclusion: Resignation Is Not the Solution Mamata Banerjee’s resignation alone is unlikely to bring about the kind of political and social change that West Bengal needs. While many may hope for her departure, it is crucial to understand that a mere change in leadership does not guarantee a shift in the entrenched systems of power and patronage that have defined her administration. True change can only come through a decisive electoral defeat, where the people of West Bengal, through their votes, dismantle the structures of power that have caused so much frustration. This would pave the way for a new administration that can bring relief to the people and restore faith in governance. Thus, while Mamata’s resignation may appear to some as a quick fix, it would likely only replace one problematic leader with another, leaving the root causes of West Bengal’s challenges unaddressed. Real change will only come when the people are able to vote for a new set of leaders who can rebuild the state’s institutions and restore accountability to the political process. It is clear that West Bengal’s future lies in the hands of its people. While Mamata Banerjee’s resignation might seem like a significant event, it is ultimately through democratic processes that true progress can be made. The power of the vote is the most effective tool in dismantling entrenched political systems, and the people of West Bengal must exercise this power judiciously. In the end, it is not the resignation of one leader that will bring about change, but the collective will of the people to elect leaders who are capable of guiding West Bengal toward a more prosperous and stable future.   The post Mamata Banerjee’s Resignation:

A Quick Fix or a Path to Deeper Chaos in West Bengal? appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[debaprasad]

A Bouquet of Songs: “Tribute” to the All India Trinamool Congress (and BJP, of course!)

A Bouquet of Songs: “Tribute” to the All India Trinamool Congress (and BJP, of course!)

[once-in-a-blue-moon2021]

A Bouquet of Songs: "Tribute" to the All India Trinamool Congress (and BJP, of course!)

Posted on 13th October, 2024 (GMT 08:45 hrs) The following songs are being dedicated to All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) and also the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for their relentless oligarchical struggle for raping the people of West Bengal and India as a whole, both physically and financially. This collage of songs is essentially being offered to their “deaf” fascist governmentality, which…

[news-venue]

"Lower Your Pitch": Chief Justice Rebukes Lawyer, He Apologises

Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud today asked a lawyer to lower his voice and asked if he was addressing the judges or the gallery outside the court. The three-judge bench, also comprising Justice Manoj Misra and Justice JB Pardiwala, was hearing the Kolkata doctor's rape and murder case that has shaken the nation.

During the arguments, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal said he had videos and photographs to show that the lawyer was throwing stones at a protest over the August 9 incident at the state-run RG Kar Medical College and Hospital.

The lawyer is Advocate Kaustav Bagchi, also a BJP leader. He switched from the Congress to the BJP earlier this year.

Responding to Mr Sibal's throwing stones charge, the lawyer asked how a senior counsel can make such statements in court.

The Chief Justice then said, "Are you trying to address the gallery outside the court? I have been noticing your demeanour for the last two hours."

"Can you first lower your pitch? Listen to the Chief Justice, lower your pitch. You are addressing three judges in front of you, not the large audience who is watching these proceedings on the video conferencing platform," the Chief Justice added.

The lawyer then apologised to the bench.

The Trinamool Congress responded to the Chief Justice reprimanding Mr Bagchi. "But what else can we expect from a loudmouth half-time advocate, full-time @BJP4India karyakarta @koustavcp who thinks courtroom decorum can be bulldozed like everything else under their rule? Today, the Hon'ble Chief Justice rightfully pulled him up for his misconduct."

Later, as more lawyers started mentioning a variety of issues, the Chief Justice remarked, "I am not used to this kind of advocacy where 7-8 people are arguing at the same time."

The Supreme Court has asked the CBI to file a fresh report in the case next Tuesday. The central agency today flagged the forensic report in the case and said "who collected the samples" has emerged as a relevant question.

Solicitor General Mehta said the central agency had decided to send samples to the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in Delhi.

"We have forensic examination report and one thing is admitted that when the girl was found at 9:30 am, her jeans and undergarments were removed and lying nearby… semi-nude and injury marks also on body… they have taken samples. they have sent to CFSL in West Bengal. CBI has taken a decision to send the sample to AIIMS," he said.

Without explicitly mentioning the findings, the Solicitor General said, "Person enters, girl is nude and this is the result of FSL. So who took the sample is relevant."

[susannatipsandtricks]

Biography of Mamata Banerjee

Mamata Banerjee, an influential Indian politician and the first woman Chief Minister of West Bengal, has been a pivotal figure in Indian politics. Known for her grassroots approach and determination, she founded the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) and has been serving as Chief Minister since 2011.

Biography of Mamata Banerjee

Attribute Information Full Name Mamata Banerjee Date of Birth January 5, 1955 Place of Birth Kolkata, West Bengal, India Nationality Indian Political Party All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) Education University of Calcutta (B.A., M.A., LLB) Profession Politician, Author Notable Positions - Chief Minister of West Bengal (since 2011) - Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha - Union Minister of Railways - Union Minister of Coal and Mines - Union Minister of Human Resource Development, Youth Affairs and Sports, Women and Child Development Awards and Honors - Bangabibhushan (2011) - Honorary Doctor of Literature (D.Litt.) from Calcutta University (2018) Publications - Struggle for Existence - My Unforgettable Memories - Slaughter of Democracy

Early Life

Mamata Banerjee, an influential Indian politician and the current Chief Minister of West Bengal, was born on January 5, 1955, in Kolkata, West Bengal. She was raised in a lower-middle-class family and grew up in a politically charged environment, which significantly influenced her future career. From a young age, Mamata was deeply involved in student politics and demonstrated a strong commitment to social justice and public service. Her early life was marked by her active participation in various political movements, and she continued to live and work in West Bengal, dedicating her efforts to the betterment of her state and its people. Her passion for politics and strong leadership qualities paved the way for her rise in Indian politics, culminating in her becoming the first woman to hold the office of Chief Minister in West Bengal.

Family

Relation Name Information Father Promileswar Banerjee Promileswar Banerjee was a freedom fighter and a devoted member of the Indian independence movement. He was known for his dedication to social causes and his influence on Mamata Banerjee's political career. Mother Gayetri Devi Gayetri Devi was a homemaker who played a significant role in shaping Mamata Banerjee's early life and values. She was a supportive figure in the family and provided a strong foundation for her children. Brother Amiya Banerjee Amiya Banerjee is one of Mamata Banerjee's siblings, known for his low-profile lifestyle. Not much is publicly known about his personal life or professional engagements. Brother Ganesh Banerjee Ganesh Banerjee, another sibling of Mamata Banerjee, has maintained a private life away from the political limelight, with limited public information available about him.

Height, Weight, And Other Body Measurements

Biography of Mamata Banerjee Attribute Details Height 5 feet 3 inches (160 cm) Weight 60 kg (132 lbs) Body Measurements 34-30-36 inches Eye Color Black Hair Color Black Date of Birth January 5, 1955 Birth Place Kolkata, West Bengal, India Profession Politician Political Party All India Trinamool Congress (TMC)

Wife/Husband 

Mamata Banerjee, the Indian politician serving as the 8th and current Chief Minister of West Bengal, is known for her formidable presence in Indian politics. As of the information available, Mamata Banerjee is not married and has no known current romantic relationships. Her dedication to her political career and public service has often been highlighted as her primary focus. There are no publicly known previous relationships or romantic involvements of Mamata Banerjee. She has maintained a private personal life, with her political career being at the forefront of public attention.

Career, Achievements And Controversies

Mamata Banerjee, born on January 5, 1955, in Kolkata, West Bengal, is a prominent Indian politician and the founder of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC or TMC). She became widely known for her fierce opposition to the Communist Party of India (Marxist) or CPI(M) and her role in ending their 34-year rule in West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee started her political career with the Indian National Congress (INC) in the 1970s. She quickly rose through the ranks and became a Member of Parliament in 1984, defeating veteran CPI(M) leader Somnath Chatterjee from the Jadavpur constituency. Her early career was marked by her relentless activism and grassroots campaigning. In 1997, dissatisfied with the Congress party, she founded the All India Trinamool Congress (TMC). Under her leadership, the TMC became a significant force in West Bengal politics. Her major achievements include: - Ending the 34-year-long Left Front rule in West Bengal by winning the 2011 state assembly elections. - Serving as the Chief Minister of West Bengal since 2011. - Implementing various social welfare schemes, such as Kanyashree, Sabuj Sathi, and Swasthya Sathi. Mamata Banerjee has received several awards and recognitions for her contributions to politics and society: - She was featured in Time magazine's list of the 100 Most Influential People in the World in 2012 and 2021. - In 2013, Mamata Banerjee was awarded the United Nations Public Service Award for her project "Kanyashree Prakalpa," which aimed to improve the status and well-being of girls in West Bengal. Despite her achievements, Mamata Banerjee's career has not been without controversies: - Singur and Nandigram Agitations: Her fierce opposition to land acquisition for industrial projects in Singur and Nandigram led to violent clashes and political upheavals. - Law and Order Concerns: Critics have accused her administration of failing to maintain law and order in West Bengal, with instances of political violence and crime rising during her tenure. - Handling of Cyclone Amphan: Her government's response to Cyclone Amphan in 2020 faced criticism for alleged inefficiencies and delays in relief efforts. - Controversial Statements: Mamata Banerjee has often been criticized for her outspoken and sometimes controversial statements, which have sparked debates and media attention.

Conclusion

Mamata Banerjee is an Indian politician serving as the Chief Minister of West Bengal. She is the founding member and leader of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC). Mamata Banerjee was born on January 5, 1955, in Kolkata, West Bengal. She earned a bachelor's degree in History from Jogamaya Devi College, a master's degree in Islamic History from the University of Calcutta, and an LLB from Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri Law College. Mamata Banerjee began her political career in the 1970s with the Indian National Congress. She founded the All India Trinamool Congress in 1998 after splitting from the Congress party. Mamata Banerjee is known for her role in defeating the 34-year-long Left Front government in West Bengal. She has also been recognized for various social and economic reforms, including improvements in healthcare and education in the state. Yes, Mamata Banerjee has served as the Minister of Railways, Minister of Coal, and Minister of State for Human Resource Development, Youth Affairs and Sports, and Women and Child Development in the central government. Read the full article

[companyknowledgenews]

Hindenburg news: Congress demands Centre to ‘eliminate all conflicts…’; TMC asks ‘will CBI, ED file cases?’ - Notice Global Online https://www.merchant-business.com/hindenburg-news-congress-demands-centre-to-eliminate-all-conflicts-tmc-asks-will-cbi-ed-file-cases/?feed_id=161998&_unique_id=66b83d21e1841 #GLOBAL - BLOGGER BLOGGER Hours after US short-seller Hindenburg Research levelled allegations against Sebi chairperson Madhabi Buch, the Congress on Saturday asked the Central government to immediately eliminate all conflicts of interest in the regulator’s investigation of the Adani Group.Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh, in an official statement, said the Sebi’s “strange reluctance” to investigate the “Adani mega scam” has been long noted, not least by the Supreme Court’s Expert Committee.“Under public pressure, after the Adani horse had bolted, SEBI’s board reintroduced stricter reporting rules on 28 June 2023. It told the Supreme Court’s Expert Committee on 25 August 2023 that it was investigating 13 suspicious transactions. Yet the investigations never bore fruit,” the Congress leader added.He stated that Hindenburg Research’s revelations on Saturday indicate that Buch and her husband invested in the same offshore funds based in Bermuda and Mauritius, where “Vinod Adani and his close associates, Chang Chung-Ling and Nasser Ali Shahban Ahli, had also invested money obtained from the over-invoicing of power equipment.”“The government must act immediately to eliminate all conflicts of interest in the SEBI investigation of Adani. The fact is that the seeming complicity of the highest officials of the land can only be resolved by setting up a JPC (joint parliamentary committee) to investigate the full scope of the Adani mega scam,” he said.Similarly, Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra also said, “crony capitalism is at its finest”. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Moitra wrote, “In true Adani style – even SEBI Chairman is investor in his group.”“Crony Capitalism at its finest. @CBiHeadquarters&@Dir_ED – will you be filing POCA and PMLA cases or not?” she asked.Google News What does Hindenburg’s new report say?Hindenburg Research has released an exclusive new report implicating SEBI chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch in the ‘Adani money siphoning scandal.’ This report follows more than a year after Hindenburg first accused the Adani Group of insider trading and other stock market violations—allegations consistently denied by the conglomerate led by Gautam Adani.The latest report highlights an offshore Mauritius fund called IPE Plus Fund, reportedly established by Vinod Adani through India Infoline. It also references the Bermuda-based Global Dynamic Opportunities Fund, which invested in IPE Plus Fund 1. Vinod Adani, a Dubai-based businessman and the elder brother of Gautam Adani, is still connected to the Adani Group.“We had previously noted Adani’s total confidence in continuing to operate without the risk of serious regulatory intervention, suggesting that this may be explained through his relationship with the SEBI Chairperson. What we hadn’t realized: the current SEBI Chairperson and her husband, Dhaval Buch, had hidden stakes in the exact same obscure offshore Bermuda and Mauritius funds, found in the same complex nested structure, used by Vinod Adani,” the report said.Google News What did Hindenburg’s previous report say?Last January, Hindenburg Research, known for shorting companies like electric truck maker Nikola Corp and Twitter (now X), accused the Adani Group of orchestrating “the largest con in corporate history.” The report claimed that the conglomerate used a complex network of offshore companies in tax havens to inflate revenues and manipulate stock prices while accumulating significant debt.Despite the Adani Group’s strong denial of these accusations, the report caused a sharp decline in the group’s stock prices, erasing over USD 150 billion in market value across its 10 listed companies at their lowest point.

However, most of these companies have since recovered their losses.Following the Hindenburg report, the Supreme Court of India directed the market regulator SEBI to investigate and formed an expert panel to examine potential regulatory lapses. The panel did not issue any negative findings against Adani, and the Supreme Court concluded that no additional investigations were necessary beyond SEBI’s ongoing inquiry.SEBI informed the Supreme Court-appointed panel that it was investigating 13 opaque offshore entities holding between 14% and 20% in five publicly traded stocks of the conglomerate. It remains unclear if these two ongoing investigations have since been completed.(With inputs from agencies)Catch all the Budget News , Business News , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.MoreLess“Congress criticied SEBI’s reluctance to investigate the Adani Group, despite ongoing probes into suspicious transactions. Hindenburg’s new report implicates SEBI Chairperson Buch in the Adani money siphoning scandal…”Source Link: https://www.livemint.com/news/india/hindenburg-news-congress-centre-eliminate-all-conflicts-tmc-asks-will-cbi-ed-file-cases-sebi-madhabi-buch-adani-11723337263358.html http://109.70.148.72/~merchant29/6network/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/9100831954_fffef93ae3_o.jpg Hours after US short-seller Hindenburg Research levelled allegations against Sebi chairperson Madhabi Buch, the Congress on Saturday asked the Central government to immediately eliminate all conflicts of interest in the regulator’s investigation of the Adani Group. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh, in an official statement, said the Sebi’s “strange reluctance” to investigate the “Adani mega … Read More

[tpdfindia]

[ezivoteofficial]

Lok Sabha Election 2024 Results: Comprehensive Overview

The results of the Lok Sabha Election 2024 are in, with all 543 constituencies reporting. Here is the detailed breakdown of the outcome across various political parties:

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)

Seats Won: 240

Seats Lost: 63

The BJP remains the single largest party, securing 240 seats, a significant decline from their previous tally, reflecting a loss of 63 seats.

Indian National Congress (INC)

Seats Won: 99

Seats Gained: 47

The Congress has seen a resurgence, winning 99 seats, a gain of 47 seats from the previous election, signaling a strengthening of their position in Indian politics.

Samajwadi Party (SP)

Seats Won: 37

Seats Gained: 32

The Samajwadi Party has made notable gains, winning 37 seats, an increase of 32 seats, showing significant growth in their political influence.

All India Trinamool Congress (AITC)

Seats Won: 29

Seats Gained: 7

The AITC has also increased its tally, securing 29 seats, up by 7 seats, maintaining its stronghold particularly in West Bengal.

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK)

Seats Won: 22

Seats Lost: 2

The DMK has won 22 seats, experiencing a slight decline with a loss of 2 seats, yet continues to hold substantial influence in Tamil Nadu.

Janata Dal (United) [JD(U)]

Seats Won: 12

Seats Lost: 4

JD(U) has secured 12 seats, a decrease of 4 seats, reflecting a minor dip in their representation.

Know more ezivote

[cavenewstimes]

'INDIA bloc my brainchild, very much part of it': Mamata Banerjee's U-turn after 'outside support' remark

NEW DELHI: A day after announcing that Trinamool Congress ( TMC ) will extend “outside support” to the INDIA alliance to form government at the Centre if it wins the Lok Sabha elections, now Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee has taken a U-turn and said she is “very much part of INDIA alliance ” at the national level. Addressing a rally in Bengal’s Tamluk, the TMC chief said, “At all India…

[newswatchindiablog]

Breaking News: Mamata Banerjee Commits Another Blunder by Conspiring Against West Bengal Governor

A temporary female staff member of the Raj Bhavan or Governor’s House in Kolkata has filed a complaint against the West Bengal governor CV Ananda Bose alleging that she has been sexually harassed by the governor. This immediately became the top 10 breaking news in India as it is a serious allegation against very high constitutional incumbent, the governor of a state. That is the technical description of the incident wherein a complaint has been filed against the governor. However, no action can be initiated against a serving governor because he enjoys constitutional immunity by law.

The governor, Ananda Bose has taken serious objection to this allegation and has already barred entry of the West Bengal Police along with a number of Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders including ministers into the Raj Bhavan premises in the state.

As per breaking India news in Hindi and other media, Governor Bose has sought legal advice to move court against the complainant, who according to him is trying to slur his position by making a fake allegation against him.

Surely the governor knows what he is saying but then such an allegation should be taken with all the seriousness it deserves and the matter should be investigated by the appropriate departments at the right time.

Is it low level politics of vendetta by the TMC?

Immediately after the woman filed her case at the Hare Street police station in Kolkata, mainstream media in Kolkata and other parts of the state went into an overdrive on the matter.

Soon it broke into the top 10 breaking news in India and the matter seems to have been orchestrated for a trial of the governor by the media since he cannot be legally tried while he holds the post.

The governor on his part is quite sure of where he stands but if it is a fake case as the BJP and many others believe it to be, then this case is going to boomerang on the TMC after the elections.

Taking advantage of the situation, chief minister Banerjee and many of her cabinet colleagues as well as party functionaries are also trying to counter the BJP’s Sandeshkhali campaign by citing the governor as the BJP’s man.

The sheer brazenness of the TMC’s attack on the governor by comparing the allegations against him with the unprecedented sleaziness of the TMC’s sex offenders in Sandeshkhali might suggest that the charges against the governor are fake. It is another matter that over 90% of the sexual harassment cases in the country are fake.

Short term political advantage could have long term consequences for TMC

The TMC was under severe pressure on the Sandeshkhali issue and it seems to have already cost it the election as the party’s own internal survey has shown the BJP getting 32 out of the 42 seats in Bengal.

In its desperation to get back at the BJP with something similar in nature to the Sandeshkhali scandal if not in scale, the TMC seems to have stepped into a legal minefield.

It knows very well that the governor cannot be touched in any way as long as holds the post and so it was decided to slur his name and reputation with this charge.

Most of the top 10 breaking news in India have also covered the governor’s prompt action in barring entry for the state police in the Raj Bhavan premises along with some members of the state cabinet among others.

He will surely initiate legal action against the temporary female staffer of the Raj Bhavan in Kolkata and the implications could embroil the TMC and its leaders including the chief minister in a legal tangle they will find very difficult to get out of. A senior state BJP leader, Dilip Ghosh has already stated that it is a fake case and is not surprising since the TMC can stoop to any depth of depravity according to him.

AUTHOR: Dev Kumar is an independent geo-political observer, commentator and blogger who tries to look at international issues in relation to India and present a different dimension that has hardly been covered by mainstream experts.

Referral link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mamata-banerjee-commits-another-blunder-conspiring-against-singh-kfawc/

[tpdfindia]

[whatsonmedia]

25,000 Teachers Fired in West Bengal! Recruitment Scam Exposed

What Happened?

Many West Bengal Teachers Impacted by Recruitment Scam Exposed.The Calcutta High Court has thrown a major wrench into the lives of over 25,000 teachers in West Bengal. The court found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process for government-aided schools, leading to the cancellation of their appointments. These teachers, now deemed to be illegally hired, will have to return their salaries with interest and face unemployment.

teachers’ recruitment scam: 25000 candidates recruited ILLEGALLY, massive corruption at all levels, says CBI

The Controversy

The controversy stems from allegations of corruption in the 2016 recruitment process conducted by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC). Some teachers allegedly secured positions by submitting blank OMR sheets, bypassing proper selection procedures. This sparked outrage from qualified candidates who missed out due to the suspected irregularities.

Court’s Orders

Job Termination: The court ordered the termination of 25,753 teachers appointed through the flawed process.

Salary Repayment: These teachers must return their salaries drawn since joining, along with 12% interest, within four weeks. District magistrates are tasked with collecting the money.

Fresh Recruitment: The WBSSC must initiate a fresh and transparent recruitment process.

CBI Probe: The court directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to further investigate the recruitment scam and submit a report within three months.

One Exception: In a rare humanitarian gesture, the court allowed Soma Das, a teacher undergoing cancer treatment, to retain her job.

The Fallout

This decision is a major blow to the Mamata Banerjee government. Several Trinamool Congress leaders, including the former education minister, are already jailed in connection with the recruitment scam. The opposition BJP has seized on the opportunity to criticize the government, claiming it exposes their corruption.

The Legal Battleground

The West Bengal government has indicated they will challenge the High Court order in the Supreme Court. The court has also ordered the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) to further probe the recruitment process and submit a report within three months. Additionally, the West Bengal School Service Commission must conduct a fresh recruitment drive.

A Deeper Look: A History of Recruitment Controversies

This isn’t the first time teacher recruitment in West Bengal has faced controversy. Last year, the High Court cancelled the appointments of 32,000 untrained primary teachers recruited through a flawed process. The judge who ordered the CBI probe in that case has since resigned and joined the BJP.

Uncertain Future for Teachers and Students

This situation leaves a lot of uncertainty. Thousands of teachers face losing their jobs, potentially impacting the education of countless students. The fresh recruitment process could take months, creating a gap in the education system. The ongoing legal battle adds another layer of complexity, with a final decision potentially taking a significant amount of time.teachers Recruitment Scam: Protesting SLST 2016 qualified teachers at under Gandhi statue

Impact beyond West Bengal

This case raises questions about the effectiveness of teacher recruitment processes across India. Ensuring fair and transparent procedures is crucial for attracting qualified educators and delivering quality education to students.

Looking Ahead: Potential Solutions

There are several paths forward. The Supreme Court’s decision will be crucial in determining the fate of the teachers. The West Bengal government needs to ensure a fair and transparent new recruitment process. Additionally, a national review of teacher recruitment practices could help prevent similar situations in the future.

This situation is a complex one, with far-reaching consequences. While the court’s decision aims to address corruption, it also creates significant hardship for the affected teachers. Finding a solution that balances accountability with fairness is vital to ensure the stability of the education system in West Bengal and beyond.

****For get more this kind of news visit WhatsOn website