#AIRenty

[akiratale]

So. I drew this art for a very long time, but I hope not for nothing, since there was a lot of effort invested. On the art, my new mascot, to which I will later make a reference to the Russian platform, and, perhaps, put it on the tabler with the translation, but this is not accurate, as my text always contains errors, because of my poor English from what you you can misunderstand the essence of the character.. sorry.

[sushiii-mushi-roll]

[thalianitz]

Contextual Studies Research Project

In 1948 the City of London faced a fierce threat when Old Father Thames rose up in anger at the treatment of his River. ‘The Great Stink’ was the event that finally forced the government to take action and remedy the dire state of the Thames. Throughout ‘The Great Stink’ the recurring motif of ‘Old Father Thames’ became a powerful means of voicing the dire need for Health Reform, creating controversy and raising public awareness of the issues that was causing the deaths of thousands of citizens in the capital. (Bibby, M). The image of a dishevelled and filthy old man offering up death and disease to the citizens of London was a powerful contrast to the noble figure penned in poetic portraits of the River. It was a contrast that highlighted the juxtaposition between the importance of the river to London’s survival and the importance with which it was being treated. The character begun life as a character in Punch, but his effectiveness as a metaphor for the state of the River soon meant that he was a regular feature in numerous Victorian periodicals, and he became a powerful metaphor of the campaign against ‘The Great Stink’ (Horrocks, C 2009).

Today the Thames no longer functions as a sewage pipe, but the health of London’s central landmark is still precarious. Data from the Water Directive Framework shows that just 16% of UK water bodies were given ‘good’ ecological status in 2018 and 2019, and that the Thames is the second most polluted river in the UK, placing just after the Mersey, which is currently more polluted than the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (Morrit, D 2014, Greenpeace 2019, Schneiday, L 2021). Whilst in the 19th century the Thames served as a channel for cholera, today it serves as a transport for waste into the North Sea; in 2019 nearly 9000 items of plastic waste were discovered along the foreshore, the large majority of it was single use plastic, meanwhile ‘reefs’ of wet wipes are forming along the course of the river, impacting not only the wildlife but the course of the River itself. (McGoran, A 2019). The disregard for the health of the River showcases a greater disregard for Rivers and freshwater courses not just in London but around the UK.

Part of the problem potentially lies in the way that rivers, particularly industrial rivers like the Thames, are perceived. Rather than being part of a ‘Wilderness’ we feel we have a responsibility to protect, natural features in an industrial landscape are considered to be part of an Urban environment. (Cronon, W 1996) Throughout its history the Thames has been viewed as an important economic resource, something that often eclipses the equally important role it holds as culturally significant landmark (Pinch, P 2015). In this century there has been a push for significant water front redevelopment; stretches of the river that were abandoned as London's docklands were moved to other parts of the country became prime real estate, redeveloped into a “strip of affluence” (Sudjic, D 2003) Disregard for the environmental state of the Thames has potentially deadly consequences; in 1958 350 people were killed as a result of flooding, and the risks are only going to increase with effects of Climate Change; only 10% of UK floodplains still function, and between 2015 and 2018 1 in 5 houses were built in areas at risk of flooding (Taylor, V 2015) (Murray, J 2020). Work by groups such as the Thames Landscape Project attempts to combat this with large scale rewilding projects, but in the fight against Climate Change it is important that rivers are not forgotten in the wider public conscious.

In the battle for wider recognition of the plight of rivers like the Thames, the best weapon might be the same as the one utilised by the Victorian satirists, Old Father Thames. Stories of mythical figures like Old Father Thames have long been used as a way to warn of the power of rivers; characters like Jenny Greenteeth and water wyrms from folk tales highlight the dangers of disrespecting our Rivers (Schneiday, L 2021). There is a long standing tradition of the veneration of waterways, it is likely that Old Father Thames is a modern iteration of an old river God. The current representation of Old Father Thames resembles the Roman deities of the Tiber and the Nile, but it is likely that was a figure attached to the Thames long predating that (Ackroyd, P 2008). Artefacts found in several rivers, including the Battersea shield, suggest a different relationship with rivers in early prehistory; these artefacts are most commonly interpreted as votive offerings that were seen not as “wasting resources, but as an investment, a way of staking a claim in the natural power of the river,” (York, J 2002). Stories of the power and protection of these river deities have endured in to the present day in the form of myths like the Lady in the Lake and Excalibur (Yates, D and Bradley, R 2015). It is also possible to draw similarities between figures like Old Father Thames and the Greenman; the Greenman has remained a figure in popular culture; he serves as a powerful reminder of our connection and responsibilities to the natural world, holding humans to account for their actions, and there are still festivals held that celebrate our links to the Greenman and our links to the natural world (Anderson, W 1990). Mythical figures have also found their way into the popular conscious through the medium of science fiction. In the 21st century there has been a growing genre of Climate Fiction, or ‘Cli-Fi”, which has emerged as a alternative method of bringing ecology and environmental issues to a wider audience. The genre of science fiction allows writers to explore environmental dystopia, utopia and the potential for an ‘ecological apocalypse’ (Milner, A and Murgmann, J R 2020). Many important works of eco-criticisim have had an enduring impact, both in terms of cultural value, and on the ecological movement. One obvious example is Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. Tolkien uses Lord of the Rings as a chance to comment on many ecological themes, Treebeard is a good example of a ‘Greenman’ esq figure; he challenges anthropocentric viewpoints and represents an alternative to the utilitarian stance presented by other characters (Brawley, C 2003). The impact of Middle Earth can be seen in the use of ‘Treebeard’ by environmental groups, one of which signed a letter with the characters name, writing in their statement “the Ents are going to war,” (Bregaland, 2006).

The enduring popularity of fictional characters showcases the effect the anthropomorphism of nature has on an audience. Anthropomorphism was first used as a term by the Greek philosopher Xenophanes to describe the similarities found in religious believers and their depiction of their Gods (Waytz, Epley, Cacioppo, 2010). Research into the phenomenon suggests that the desire to anthropomorphise the environment is a “basic human attitude” present from the early stages of childhood to allow us to empathise and interact with “non-humans as if they were human beings” (Airentu, G 2018). The ramifications of anthropomorphism on environmental debate are significant; the anthropomorphism of nature enables people to create a stronger bond with the environment, fostering a more environmentally friendly viewpoint. Pro-environmental views are tied to the feeling of environmental guilt, when nature is anthropomorphised these feelings are exacerbated, often prompting the adoption of more ecologically aware behaviours (Tam, K-P 2019). The use of terms such as ‘Mother Earth’ are good examples of using targeted anthropomorphism to encourage feelings of guilt and empathy in the public (Waytz, Epley, Cacioppo, 2010). Just as with the cartoons of Father Thames during the time of the Great Stink, the use of anthropomorphised representations of nature creates a stronger and more enduring message; for instance, a TV advert highlighting the environmental dangers of palm oil, featuring an anthropomorphised orang-utan was banned from being broadcast on the basis that it was too political (Butler, S and Sweney, M 2018).

Anthropomorphisation is clearly a useful tool in addressing the problems that stem from our increased urbanisation. The empathy for an anthropomorphic version of nature can help us to see ourselves as part of nature, as opposed to ‘the other’. (Daston, L 1995). In a world where we spend an estimated 90% of our lives indoors, it is difficult for environmental groups to rely solely on an individuals experiences in nature to promote an environmentally friendly attitude, anthropomorphism can help people bridge that gap (Tam, KP,. Lee, SL,. Chao, MM,. 2013). Some have suggested that a process of ‘Reenchantment’ is essential to promoting a healthier and more sustainable relationship with the environment; utilising the power of the ‘sublime’ in nature as a motivation to reconnect with the natural world, as well as retuning some of the ‘magic’ and ‘wonder’ to it (Barlett, P 2008). The use of quasi-mythical figures like Old Father Thames can especially help us to reconnect with overlooked areas of ‘Wilderness’ like the River Thames, by drawing on the cultural history of those myths and by using anthropomorphism to remind us of the interconnection and interdependence between us and the natural world.

Bibliography

Ackroyd, P (2008) “Thames: Sacred River”, Vintage Books, London

Airenti, G (2018) “The development of Anthropomorphism in Interaction: Intersubjectivity, Imagination and Theory of Mind”, Frontiers in Psychology

Anderson, W (1990) “Green Man: The Archetype of Our Oneness with the Earth”, HarperCollins, London

Barlett, P (2008) “Reason and Reenchantment in Cultural Change: Sustainability in Higher Education”, Anthropology, Vol. 49, No. 6, pg. 1077-1098, Chicago, USA

Bibby, M (accessed 2021) “London’s Great Stink”, History Magazine, Historic UK, (https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Londons-Great-Stink/)

Brawley, C (2008), “The Fading of the World: Tolkien’s ecology and loss in The Lord of the Rings”, Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, USA

Bregaland (2006), ‘“The Ents are going to war”; Earth Liberation Front Strikes Maryland”, Earth First!, Vol. 26, No. 2, pg. 8, Daily Planet Publishing, Tuscon, United States

Butler, S and Sweney, M (2018) “Iceland’s Christmas TV advert rejected for being too political”, The Guardian, London, UK

Cronon, W (1996) ‘The Trouble with Wilderness: Or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature”, Environmental History, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-28, Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History, USA

Daston L, (1995) “How Nature Became the Other: Anthropocentrism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy”, Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors. Sociology of the Sciences - A Yearbook 1994 (Maasen, S., Mendelson, E,. Weingart, P,. ed.), vol. 18, Springer, Netherlands

Davis, JL,. Green, JD,. Reed, A (2009) “Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness and environmental behaviour”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.29, No. 2, pp. 173-180

Gleeson-White, J (2018) “It’s only natural: the push to give rivers, mountains and forests legal rights”, The Guardian, London, UK

Greenpeace, (2019) “UK river more polluted than Great Pacific Garbage Patch,” Greenpeace Press Release

Horrocks, C (2009) “Father Thames Revenge: visualising reform through the characterisation of a social problem”, Popular Narrative Media, Vol. 2, no.1, p.23, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

Horrocks, C (2003), “The Personification of “Father Thames”: Reconsidering the Role of the Victorian Periodical Press in the “Verbal and Visual Campaign” for Public Heath Reform, Victorian Periodicals Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, p.2 -19, John Hopkins University Press

McGoran, A (2019) “Microplastic pollution and wet wipe ‘reefs’ are changing the River Thames ecosystem”, The Conversation, London

Milner, A,. Burgmann, J R,. (2020) “Science Fiction and Climate Change: A sociological Approach”, Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, UK

Mishra, S K, (2016) “Ecocriticism: A Study of Environmental Issues in Literature”, BRICS Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 168 - 170,

Morrit, D (2014) “Plastic in the Thames: A River Runs through it”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 78, No. 1-2, pg. 196-200, UK

Murray, J (2020) “Rewilding Project aims to give Thames its floodplain back”, The Guardian, London, UK

Pinch, P (2015) “Waterspace Planning and the River Thames in London”, The London Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, pg. 272-292, London, UK

Schneidau, L (2021) “Understanding the Current”, Resurgence and Ecologist, Vol. 325, pp. 34 - 36, Devon, England

Shtulman, A (2008) “Variation in the anthropomorphization of supernatural beings and its implications for cognitive theories of religion”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 35, no. 5, pg, 1123 - 1138

Sudjic, D (2003) “Sold Down the River”, The Observer, London UK

Tam, K-P (2019) “Anthropomorphism of Nature, Environmental Guilt and Pro-Environmental Behaviour”, Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 19

Tam, K-P,. Lee, S-L,. Chao, MM,. (2013) “Saving Mr. Nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 3

Taylor, V (2015) “London’s River? The Thames as a Contested Environmental Space”, The London Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, pg. 183-195, London, UK

Urquiza-Haas, E and Kotrschal, K (2015) “The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: attribution of mental states to other species”, Animal Behaviour, Vol. 109, pg. 167-176,

Waytz, A., Epley, N., Cacioppo, J-T, (2010) “Social Cognition Unbound: Insights into Anthropomorphism and Dehumanization”, Current directions in psychological science, Vol. 12, no. 1, pg. 58-62

Wilson, E (1993) “Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic”, The Biophilia Hypothesis, pg. 31-42, Washington, USA

Yates, D,. Bradley, R,. (2015) “Still water, hidden depths, the deposition of Bronze Age metalwork in the English Fenland”, Antiquity, Vol. 84, No. 324, Cambridge, UK

York, J (2002), “The life cycle of Bronze Age metalwork from the Thames”, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 21, No. 1, pg. 77-92, Oxford, UK

[softrobotcritics]

Machine Movement Lab

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2020.577900/full

The Esthetics of Encounter: A Relational-Performative Design Approach to Human-Robot Interaction

Petra Gemeinboeck

Department of Media Theory, University of Applied Arts Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Centre for Transformative Media Technologies, School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

This article lays out the framework for relational-performative esthetics in human-robot interaction, comprising a theoretical lens and design approach for critical practice-based inquiries into embodied meaning-making in human-robot interaction. I explore the centrality of esthetics as a practice of embodied meaning-making by drawing on my arts-led, performance-based approach to human-robot encounters, as well as other artistic practices. Understanding social agency and meaning as being enacted through the situated dynamics of the interaction, I bring into focus a process of bodying-thinging; entangling and transforming subjects and objects in the encounter and rendering elastic boundaries in-between. Rather than serving to make the strange look more familiar, aesthetics here is about rendering the differences between humans and robots more relational....

References

Airenti, G. (2015). The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: from relatedness to empathy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 117–127. doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0263-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alač, M. (2015). Social robots: things or agents?. AI Soc. 31 (1), 519–535. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0631-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alač, M. (2011). When a robot is social: spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41 (6), 893–926. doi:10.1177/0306312711420565

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexander, T. (2013). The human eros: eco-ontology and the aesthetics of existence. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aviv, V. (2017). Abstracting dance: detaching ourselves from the habitual perception of the moving body. Front. Psychol. 8, 776. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00776

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bal, M. (2015). “Documenting what? Auto-theory and migratory aesthetics,” in A companion to contemporary documentary film. Editors A. Juhasz and A. Lebow (NJ: Hoboken), 124–144. doi:10.1002/9781118884584.ch6

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs. 28 (3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartenieff, I., and Dori, L. (1980). Body movement; coping with the environment. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2012). Practical aesthetics events: affects and art after 9/11. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bianchini, S., and Quinz, E. (2016). “Behavioral objects: a case study,” in In behavioral objects 1—a case study: celeste boursier-mougenot. Editors S. Bianchini, and E. Quinz (Berlin, DE: Sternberg Press), 5–28.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Billard, A., Calinon, S., Dillmann, R., and Schaal, S. (2008). “Robot programming by demonstration,” in In springer handbook of robotics. Editors B. Siciliano, and O. Khatib (Berlin, DE: Springer-Verlag), 1371–1394.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boer, L., and Bewley, H. (2018). “Reconfiguring the appearance and expression of social robots by acknowledging their otherness,” in Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. (New York, NY: ACM), 667–677. doi:10.1145/3196709.3196743

Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., Canadas, E., and Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Front. Psychol. 6, 869–911. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breazeal, C., Brooks, A., Gray, J., Hancher, M., McBean, J., Stiehl, D., et al. (2003). Interactive robot theatre. Commun. ACM. 46 (7), 76–85. doi:10.1145/792704.792733

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brunete, A., Ranganath, A., Segovia, S., de Frutos, J. P., Hernando, M., and Gambao, E. (2017). Current trends in reconfigurable modular robots design. Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. 14 (3), 1–21. doi:10.1177/1729881417710457

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castañeda, C., and Suchman, L. (2014). Robot visions. Soc. Stud. Sci. 44 (3), 315–341. doi:10.1177/0306312713511868

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K. (2013). “Human-robot interaction,” in In Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Editors M. Soegaard, R. F. D. Dam, and K. Aarhus. 2nd Edn (Aarhus, Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation), 2283–2366.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C., and Alissandrakis, A. (2003). “Learning by experience from others—social learning and imitation in animals and robots,” in Adaptivity and learning: an interdisciplinary debate. Editors R. Kühn, R. Menzel, W. Menzel, U. Ratsch, M. Richter, and I. Stamatescu (Berlin, Germany: Springer), 217–421.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Graaf, M. M., and Allouch, S. B. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 61 (12), 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., Pieper, B., Clénin, D., and Fuchs, T. (2017). Grasping intersubjectivity: an invitation to embody social interaction research. Phenomenol. Cognitive Sci. 16, 491–523. doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9469-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Demers, L.-P. (2016). “The multiple bodies of a machine performer,” in Robots and art: exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, K. Christian, and Stelarc (Singapore, SG: Springer), 273–306. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0321-9_14

Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human-animal worlds. Theor. Cult. Soc. 30 (7-8), 51–76. doi:10.1177/0263276413496852

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. J. Philos. 31 (10), 275–276.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., and De Jaegher, H. (2010). “Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play,” in Enaction: towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Editors J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, and E. Di Paolo (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 33–87.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dimitrova, Z. (2017). Robotic performance: an ecology of response. Performance Philosophy. 3 (1), 162–177. doi:10.21476/PP.2017.3135

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action is. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eckersall, P., Grehan, H., and Scheer, E. (2017). New media dramaturgy: performance, media and new-materialism. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: a new aesthetics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Routledge.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Foster, S. L. (2000). “Foreword,” in My body the buddhist. Editor D. Hay (Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frauenberger, C. (2019). Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 27 (1), 1–27. doi:10.1145/3364998

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Froese, T., and Fuchs, T. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neuro-phenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenol. Cognitive Sci. 11, 205–236. doi:10.1007/s11097-012-9254-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuchs, T., and Koch, S. (2014). Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Front. Psychol. 5 (3), 508–512. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fuchs, T. (2016). “Intercorporeality and interaffectivity,” in Intercorporeality: emerging socialities in interaction. Editors C. Meyer, J. Streeck, and S. Jordan (Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.003.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gamble, C. N., Hanan, J. S., and Nail, T. (2019). What is new materialism? Angelaki. 24 (6), 111–134. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2019.1684704

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P. (2019). “Dancing with the nonhuman,” in Thinking in the world. Editors J. Bennett, and M. Zournazi (London, United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Academic), 214–239.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2019). “Exploring social co-presence through movement in human robot encounters,” in Proceeding of the AISB 2019 Symposium on Movement that shapes behaviour, Falmouth, United Kingdom, April 2019. http://aisb2019.machinemovementlab.net/MTSB2019_Gemeinboeck_Saunders.pdf (Accessed June 20 2020).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2018). “Human-robot kinesthetics: mediating kinesthetic experience for designing affective non-humanlike social robots,” in Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE RO-MAN: the 27th IEEE International Conference on Robot and human interactive communication. New York, NY: IEEE, 571–576. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525596

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2017). Movement matters: how a robot becomes body. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing (MOCO’17), London United Kingdom, June, 2017, 1–8.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2016a). “The performance of creative machines,” in In cultural robotics. CR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science 9549. Editors J.T. K. V. Koh, B. J. Dunstan, D. Silvera-Tawil, and M. Velonaki. (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 159–172. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42945-8_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gemeinboeck, P., and Saunders, R. (2016b). “Towards socializing non-anthropomorphic robots by harnessing dancers’ kinesthetic awareness,” in In cultural robotics. CR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science 9549. Editors J.T. K. V. Koh, B. J. Dunstan, D. Silvera-Tawil, and M. Velonaki (Cham, Switzerland: Springer), 85–97. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42945-8_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gibson, E. J. (1963). Perceptual learning. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 14, 29–56. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.000333

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: gender, race and nature in the world of modern science. New York, NY: Routledge.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became Posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hegel, F., Muhl, C., Wrede, B., Hielscher-Fastabend, M., and Sagerer, G. (2009). “Understanding social robots,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conferences on Advances in computer-human interaction, Cancun, Mexico, February 2009. New York, NY: IEEE, 169–174.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hegel, F. (2012). “Effects of a robot’s aesthetic design on the attribution of social capabilities,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: the 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and human interactive communication, Paris, France, September 2012. New York, NY: IEEE, 469–475. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343796

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffman, G., and Ju, W. (2014). Designing robots with movement in mind. JHRI., 3, 89–122. doi:10.5898/JHRI.3.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hoffman, G., and Weinberg, G. (2011). Interactive improvisation with a robotic marimba player. Aut. Robots. 31 (2–3), 133–153. doi:10.1007/s10514-011-9237-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hylving, L. (2017). Sociomaterial quasi-objects: from interface to experience. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9 (3), 202–219. doi:10.17705/1thci.00095

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jochum, E., and Goldberg, K. (2016). “Cultivating the uncanny: the Telegarden and other oddities,” in In Robots and art: Exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors D. Herath, C. Kroos, and Stelarc (Singapore: Springer), 149–175.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jochum, E., Millar, P., and Nuñez, D. (2017). Sequence and chance: design and control methods for entertainment robots. Robot. Autonom. Syst. 87, 372–380. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jochum, E., Vlachos, E., Christoffersen, A., Nielsen, S., Grindsted, H., and Ibrahim, A. (2016). Using theatre to study interaction with care robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8 (4), 457–470. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0370-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (2018). The aesthetics of meaning and thought: the bodily Roots of philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, R. A. (2018). “Human-robot relationships,” in In posthumanism: the Future of Homo sapiens. Editors M. Bess, and D. W. Pasulka (Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan), 365–375.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, R. A. (2017). What makes a robot “social”? Soc. Stud. Sci. 47 (4), 556–579. doi:10.1177/0306312717704722

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jørgensen, J. (2019). Constructing soft robot aesthetics: art, sensation, and Materiality in practice. PhD thesis. Copenhagen, Denmark: IT University of CopenhagenAvailable at: https://pure.itu.dk/portal/files/84722485/PhD_Thesis_Final_Version_Jonas_J_rgensen.pdf ( Accessed October 11, 2020).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kac, E. (1997). Foundation and development of robotic art. Art J. 56 (3), 60–67. doi:10.1080/00043249.1997.10791834

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karg, M., Samadani, A. A., Gorbet, R., Kühnlenz, K., Hoey, J., and Kulić, D. (2013). Body movements for affective expression: a survey of automatic recognition and generation. IEEE Trans. Affective Comput. 4 (4), 341–359. doi:10.1109/T-AFFC.2013.29

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Knight, H., and Simmons, R. G. (2014). “Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban Effort Features for mobile robots,” in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE RO-MAN: 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. (New York, NY: IEEE), 267–273. doi:10.1109/roman.2014.6926264

Koch, S. C. (2014). Rhythm is it: effects of dynamic body feedback on affect and attitudes. Front. Psychol. 5 (3), 537–611. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kroos, C., Herath, D.C., and Stelarc, (2012). Evoking agency: attention model and behavior control in a robotic art installation. Leonardo 45 (5), 401–407. doi:10.1162/leon_a_00435

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laban, R. (1972). “The Mastery of movement.” Revised and enlarged by lisa ullmann. 3rd Edn. Boston, MA: PLAYS Inc..

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lasseter, J. (2001). Tricks to animating characters with a computer. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics. 35 (2), 45–47. doi:10.1145/563693.563706

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

LaViers, A., Cuan, C., Maguire, C., Bradley, K., Mata, K. B., Nilles, A., et al. (2018). Choreographic and somatic approaches for the development of expressive robotic systems. Arts. 7 (2), 1–21. doi:10.3390/arts7020011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leach, J., and deLahunta, S. (2017). Dance becoming knowledge: designing a digital “body”. Leonardo. 50 (5), 461–467. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01074

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, H. R., Šabanović, S., and Stolterman, E. (2016). “How humanlike should a social robot be: a user-centered exploration,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Enabling Computing Research in Socially Intelligent Human-Robot Interaction. (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI), 135–141. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/viewFile/12751/11934 (Accessed October 10, 2020).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Levillain, F., and Zibetti, E. (2017). Behavioural objects: the rise of the evocative machines. JHRI. 6 (1), 4–24. doi:10.5898/JHRI.6.1.Levillain

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindblom, J. (2020). A radical reassessment of the body in social cognition. Front. Psychol. 11, 987. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00987

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindblom, J., and Alenljung, B. (2020). The ANEMONE: theoretical foundations for UX evaluation of action and intention recognition in human-robot interaction. Sensors. 20 (15), 4284. doi:10.3390/s20154284

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodied social cognition. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lindblom, J., and Ziemke, T. (2003). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: vygotsky and beyond. Adapt. Behav. 2003 (11), 79–96. doi:10.1177/10597123030112002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maher, M. L., Merrick, K., and Saunders, R. (2008). “Achieving creative behaviour using curious learning agents,” in AAAI spring symposium: creative intelligent systems’08, technical report SS-08-03. Editors D. Ventura, M. L. Maher, and S. Colton (Stanford, CA: AAAI)), 40–46.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: a theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manning, E., and Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mindell, D. A. (2015). Our robots, ourselves: robotics and the myths of autonomy. New York, NY: Viking.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., and Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Top Cogn Sci. 4 (4), 705–716. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads: why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noland, C. (2009). “Coping and choreography,” in Proceeding of the Digital Arts and culture 2009 (DAC 09). Irvine, CA, December, 2009, UC Irvine. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gq729xq (Accessed April 17, 2020).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osborne, H. (1986). Interpretation in science and in art. Br. J. Aesthet. 26 (1), 3–15. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/26.1.3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paauwe, R. A., Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., and Keyson, D. V. (2015). Designing robot embodiments for social interaction: affordances topple realism and aesthetics. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 697–708. doi:10.1007/s12369-015-0301-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penny, S. (2000). “Agents as artworks: and agent design as artistic practice,” in Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology. Editor K. Dautenhahn (Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company), 395–414. doi:10.1075/aicr.19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penny, S. (2017). Making sense: cognition, computing, art, and embodiment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penny, S. (2016). “Robotics and art, computationalism and embodiment,” in In Robots and art: Exploring an unlikely symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, and K. Christian (Singapore: Springer), 47–65.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penny, S. (2011). Towards a performative aesthetic of interactivity. Fibreculture J. 19, 72–108.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pfeifer, R., and Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Piris, P. (2014). “The Co-presence and ontological ambiguity of the puppet,” in The routledge companion to puppet theatre. Editors D. N. Posner, C. Orenstein, and J. Bell. (London, United Kingdom: Routledge), 30–42. doi:10.4324/9781315850115.ch2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Popat, S. H., and Palmer, S. D. (2005). Creating common ground: dialogues between performance and digital technologies. Int. J. Perform. Art. Digit. Media. 1 (1), 47–65. doi:10.1386/padm.1.1.47/1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rietveld, E., and Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 26 (4), 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Šabanović, S. (2010). Robots in society, society in robots: mutual shaping of society and technology as a framework for social robot design. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2 (4), 439–450. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0066-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salvini, P., Laschi, C., and Dario, P. (2010). Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int. J. Soc. Robot., 2, 451–460. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0079-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sandry, E. (2016). “The potential of otherness in robotic art,” in Robots and Art: Exploring an Unlikely Symbiosis. Editors H. Damith, and K. Christian (Singapore: Springer), 177–189.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saunders, R., and Gemeinboeck, P. (2018). “Performative Body Mapping for designing expressive robots.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Creativity (Coimbra, PT: ACC), Salamanca, Spain, June, 2018, 280–287.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schleicher, D., Jones, P., and Kachur, O. (2010). Bodystorming as Embodied Designing. Interactions. 17 (6), 47–51. doi:10.1145/1865245.1865256

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2010). Kinesthetic experience: understanding movement inside and out. Body Movement Dance Psychother. 2, 111–127. doi:10.1080/17432979.2010.496221

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). From movement to dance. Phenom. Cogn. Sci. 11, 39–57. doi:10.1007/s11097-011-9200-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2011). “The primacy of movement.,” in Series on advances in consciousness research 14. 2nd Edition (Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company). doi:10.1075/aicr.14

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sirkin, D., Mok, B., Yang, S., Maheshwari, R., and Ju, W. (2016). “Improving design thinking through collaborative improvisation” in Design thinking research., 93–108. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19641-1_7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

St-Onge, D., Levillain, F., Zibetti, E., and Beltrame, G. (2019). Collective expression: how robotic swarms convey information with group motion. Paladyn. J. Behav. Rob. 10, 418–435. doi:10.1515/pjbr-2019-0033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stacey, J., and Suchman, L. (2012). Animation and automation: the liveliness and labours of bodies and machines. Body Soc. 18 (1), 1–46. doi:10.1177/1357034X11431845

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated action: the problem of human–machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (2007a). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. 2nd Edn. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (2007b). “Agencies in technology design: feminist reconfigurations” in hackett,” in The handbook of science and technology studies. Editors O. Amsterdamska, M.E. Lynch, and J. Wajcman. 3rd Edn (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (2011). Subject objects. Fem. Theor. 12 (2), 119–145. doi:10.1177/1464700111404205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suschke, S. (2003). Müller macht Theater: Zehn Inszenierungen und ein Epilog. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turkle, S. (2005). The second self: computers and the human spirit. 20th Edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Uexküll, J. V. (1957). “A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds,” in Instinctive behavior: the Development of a modern concept. Editor C. H. Schiller (New York, NY: International Universities Press), 5–80.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vlachos, E., Jochum, E., and Demers, L.-P. (2016). The effects of exposure to different social robots on attitudes toward preferences. Interaction Studies 17 (3), 390–404. doi:10.1075/is.17.3.04vla

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wright, P. (2011). Reconsidering the H, the C, and the I: some thoughts on reading suchman’s human-machine reconfigurations. Interactions. 18 (5), 28–31. doi:10.1145/2008176.2008185

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Mok, B. K.-J., SirkinIve, D. H. P., Maheshwari, R., Fischer, K., and Ju, W. (2015). “Experiences developing socially acceptable interactions for a robotic trash barrel,” in The 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, Kobe, Japan, August, 2015 (New York, NY: IEEE), 277–284. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333693

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ziemke, T. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition. Cognit. Syst. Res. 3, 271–274. doi:10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00068-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ziemke, T., and Sharkey, N. (2001). A stroll through the worlds of robots and animals. Semiotica. 13 (1–4), 701–746. doi:10.1515/semi.2001.050

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ziemke, T. (2016). The body of knowledge: on the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems. 148, 4–11. doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zivanovic, A. (2019). “Elegant, natural motion of robots: lessons from an artist” in Gemeinboeck,” in Proceedings of the AISB 2019 Symposium on Movement that shapes behaviour (MTSB’19). Editors P. Gemeinboeck, and R. Saunders. Available at: http://aisb2019.machinemovementlab.net/MTSB2019_Proceedings.pdf (Accessed June 21 2020).

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: human-robot interaction design, aesthetics, performativity, agency, design, movement

Citation: Gemeinboeck P (2021) The Esthetics of Encounter: A Relational-Performative Design Approach to Human-Robot Interaction. Front. Robot. AI 7:577900. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.577900

Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 16 March 2021.

Edited by:

Elizabeth Ann Jochum

, Aalborg University, Denmark

Reviewed by:

Gregory J. Corness

, Columbia College Chicago, United States

Jonas Jørgensen

, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Copyright © 2021 Gemeinboeck. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Petra Gemeinboeck, petra.gemeinboeck@uni-ak.ac.at

Add

[brandufo]

Top 10 Best Upcoming Startups Coming 2021

In this article we will discuss Top 10 Best Upcoming Startups Coming 2021. A startup is a company formed by its creators on a concept or an issue that has the potential for substantial business success and also effect. Sometimes, the initial production begins well before that, with the quest for a concept or a meaningful challenge worth solving, accompanied by the creation of a dedicated founding team associated with a common mission to carry the vision to life. The goal of the initial founder(s) is to form a dedicated co-founder team with the requisite expertise and abilities to verify the initial problem/solution match and product/market fit before scaling it to a significant organisation and self-sustaining enterprise. So, in addition to the creativity phase itself, from concept to value-generating product to business model, startups must also have a large and dedicated founding team to turn all of these into a real growing enterprise and organisation that captures the value generated as a successful company.

The enterprise tech startup market is brimming with businesses capitalising on rising demand for tools in big data, devops, cloud, mobility, the internet of things, and also safety, even as the pandemic triggers disturbances.

1. Cockroach Labs

Cockroach Labs is a software development organisation that produces industrial information management systems. CockroachDB, a cloud-native, distributed SQL database that offers "next-level accuracy, ultra-resilience, data locality, and also large scale to modern cloud apps," was created in 2015 by three ex-Google employees. Cockroach Labs' sales more than doubled in 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 epidemic, due in part to rapid cloud adoption. The startup anticipates similar development this year and also expects to be on target to increase its staff from 200 to 400 workers by the end of 2021. Cockroach Labs received $160 million in Series E financing on January 12, 2021. The round comes only eight months after the startup received $86.6 million in Series D financing, valuing the venture at about $2 billion.

2. Layer CI

LayerCI (backed by Y-Combinator) assists technology-forward companies in disrupting their markets. They built the world's first Continuous Staging platform, an easy-to-use and Also flexible cloud-based SaaS that offers any app developer the best CI/CD + staging experience.

3. ODAIA

ODAIA is a leader in integrating process mining, consumer path analysis, and AI to provide sales and marketing analytics as well as process automation solutions to enterprise businesses around the world. The ODAIA is based in Toronto, Canada, and was established at the University of Toronto. ODAIA is operated by a seasoned team of serial founders, data analysts, and AI developers, and it is trusted by leading global organisations. Maptual and also Multitüd, AI-powered consumer segmentation, commercial automation, and predictive analytics SaaS platforms for Pharma and eCommerce, respectively, were recently unveiled by ODAIA. Based on clear success targets, ODAIA feedback and also predictive analytics enrich consumer profiles and identify audience targeting segments.

4. AIRenty

AIRenty is a SaaS PropTech platform that uses AI to streamline the Real Estate rental phase.  They render the quest activity more fun and also less time intensive for all by automating and simplifying the workflow!

5. Local logic

Local Logic is a location intelligence platform that quantifies a location's "sense of position." Local Logic provides predictive analytics to inform real estate decision making in the built world, with over 20 billion individual data points — the highest unique position data collection in the United States and also Canada. City architects and also data scientists are among the founder members of the company. The organisation integrates geospatial, user-generated, and real estate data to provide a comprehensive view of space, as well as how users interpret and appreciate it. The technology of Local Logic brings clarity to the real estate industry.

6. NorthOne

NorthOne is a mobile-first, tech-powered bank account designed for entrepreneurs, freelancers, and small/medium-sized companies, allowing them to bank, handle their money, and combine all of their financial resources in an easy and also intuitive manner. Poor financial literacy has a disproportionate effect on SMB expenses and failure rates, and NorthOne is on a quest to eradicate these issues so that company owners can concentrate on what really counts – building a profitable business. NorthOne is more than just a financial platform; it's the world-class Finance Department that SMBs can't manage.

7. Remitr

Remitr is a Toronto-based fintech company that provides a safer solution to money transfers, check payments, and also bank visits for company payments. The Remitr Global Network enables companies to send payments through Canada and to over 150 countries in a matter of days. Remitr, co-founded in 2016 by Kanchan Kumar and also Sandeep Todi, currently handles hundreds of millions of dollars every year and is funded by institutional investors.

8. PointClickCare 

PointClickCare's revolutionary cloud-based platform has driven the business from startup to market pioneer, advancing the senior care sector and creating a real change in people's lives. PointClickCare, recently called one of Deloitte's fastest expanding technology companies and also one of Canada's best run businesses, offers numerous benefits and a fantastic atmosphere for workers.

9. Viafoura

Viafoura assists businesses in creating productive, civil, and committed online communities through best-in-class interaction and content moderation solutions such as real-time chats, live blogs, group talk, personalization software, and AI-powered moderation. Customers may now gain access to new and also useful insights into their target audience's habits and interests thanks to sophisticated data analytics.

10. Ruckify

Firstly, Ruckify is the world's largest peer-to-peer renting marketplace, with the aim of reducing needless consumerism and allowing customers the chance to make money from ordinary things they already own. Ruckify believes in groups that share, cooperate, and support one another whilst fostering sustainability. You can rent items from other members of the group, or you can launch your own side hustle and also list your own products for rent. Well, Ruckify partners with people, small businesses interested in rentals, and also established rental firms. To further reduce the environmental impact of consumer products, also Ruckify plants a tree with every sign-up, rental, and analysis produced in the marketplace. Recent articles - Top 10 Best Upcoming Startups Coming 2021 - The Top 10 Most Rewatched Action Movie Scenes Ever in Hollywood- Click here - The Top 10 Hardest Monsters to Kill in Movies in Hollywood- Click here - One of Top 10 movies related to 21st-century software technology you must watch- Click here - Top 10 best American Tv Series you must watch 2021 - Click here - Future Trending Tech 2021 to 2025 Next 5 Years- Click here - Top 10 Startup Ideas Entrepreneurs become Billionaires- Click here - Penny Stocks buy in 2021 - ReactJS Not Recommend Building Enterprise Applications- Click here - Famous Indian celebrities enter Tech startups- Click here - Top 6 Digital Marketing Agencies San Francisco- Click here - Top 5 Backend Programming Languages Higher Growth 2025 - Click here Read the full article

[forumelettrico]

La Colonnina Enel X Fast presso il Conad di Imperia in Via Giuseppe Airenti: nessun problema sulla DC con Nissan Leaf https://www.forumelettrico.it/forum/fast-evad-imperia-conad-via-airenti-t5388.html #Imperia #EnelX #Conad

[limemagazineeu]

Lite per un cane a Imperia: prende a sprangate il vicino e scaraventa la moglie giù dalle scale

Lite per un cane a Imperia: prende a sprangate il vicino e scaraventa la moglie giù dalle scale

Follia questa mattina a Imperia dove un uomo di sessanta anni avrebbe preso a sprangate il vicino di casa e avrebbe ferito anche la moglie dell’uomo, scaraventata dalle scale mentre cercava di difendere il marito. L’aggressione sarebbe nata per futili motivi, sembra per via di un cane di proprietà della figlia dell’aggressore.

Un grave episodio di violenza è andato in scena lunedì mattina intorno…

[riyerose]

Red and Green(A Love Story between Tomato Juice and Celery)

“Celren, come on. Let’s go have lunch already!”

Celren Airenty was busily giving the petunias water when his female co-worker Abbie called out to him, her voice sharp and slightly annoyed. The tall brunette set down the watering can, slipped out of his apron and grabbed his sweater before exiting the shop. The sign was already turned to ‘Sorry, We’re Closed!’ since it was just the two of them working in the shop that afternoon. Abbie smiled up at him and led the way. Celren wasn’t oblivious to what she was doing. Recently, Abbie had started demanding they have lunch together and took the train together with him despite living in a different direction. But it was difficult for him to come right out and say that he wasn’t interested in her because there was someone else in his eyes.

They arrived at a small, yet well-known sandwich shop called Buns and Brunch. Celren always smiled a bit to himself whenever he saw the shop’s name. The manager was one playful person. The shop was pretty crowded but they managed to find an open table near the window. A server came rushing over a few minutes later, apologizing hastily for the wait before taking their orders. Abbie chose a turkey ham hoagie with no onions and a glass of ice water while Celren asked for a veggie burger, extra celery on the side and a sweet tea. Abbie raised an eyebrow at Celren after the server had skated away through the crowd of people. 

“You really love celery, don’t you Celren?”

A bashful smile spread on Celren’s face. “I suppose you could say that.” He paused for a moment, brushing his fingers through the messy bun/ponytail that his chesnut brown curls were tied in. “Abbie, listen, there’s something I have to tell you.”

“What is it, Celren?”

“You...like me, don’t you?”

The girl smiled at him. “You could tell?”

“It was hard not to... The truth is Abbie... I-”

“Cel!” 

Celren let out a gasp when an arm was flung around his neck and he was tugged to the side by a powerful force. He pouted at the black and redheaded male that grabbed him. 

“Tom! I told you about being so rough! Lemme go!”

One of the more popular servers at the sandwich shop was one Tom Aloton, a charismatic guy who was particularly fond of tomato juice and grilled cheese. He also made it a personal hobby to bedger and pster Celren whenever he came to the shop. But Celren never was truly angry at the pestering. He couldn’t be because Tom was the person that had captured his heart. Abbie giggled at Tom and Celren, sparking Tom’s attention to move to her. 

“You’re here with a pretty girl like that, Cel? Man, I’m so jealous!” He winked at Abbie, eliciting another giggle from her. “She’s super cute! If Cel here gives you any trouble, you let me know! I’ll straighten him out!”

Abbie laughed. “I’ll be sure to do that! Right, Celren?”

“Yeah...” Celren answered quietly, his heart aching. “Right.”

Why was it so hard for him to say what he felt? In the past, there was never a problem. Maybe it was different because this time, the person he loved was someone who shined so brightly Celren felt he’d get burned if he tried to get anywhere near him. His heart would beat a mile a minute whenever he saw Tom. Celren was a hopeless mess. After his work shift ended that evening and he experienced another awkward train ride with Abbie, he sat in his bedroom by his window where his potted flowers. His lilies were blooming nicely. He’d checked on his garden a bit earlier, overseeing the fruits and veggies he’d planted a while back. There were some that were already sprouting but nothing was fully ready to be picked. Celren sighed softly. 

“I wonder what I should do...” he murmured against the flower petals. “Maybe I should write a letter or something.”

Just then, the doorbell rang out, surprising Celren. Shouting ‘I’m coming!’, he raced down the steps and hurried to open the door. His heart nearly burst into a thousand pieces and he almost fainted. Tom stood at his door with a big grin on his face and two cases of beer in his hands. “Hey Cel, let’s get drunk!”