#2) contain content that is VERY VALID to criticize and can be off-putting enough to drive people away

[dr-zl]

lately I've been desperate to have a friend who matches my freak regarding one piece (especially if it was an existing friend that started watching/reading it so I can get the live reactions) but unfortunately as much as I LOVE one piece, I also cannot recommend it to anyone in good conscience lol...

[mbti-notes]

Any tips on how to read faster?

It’s something that comes naturally for me and I’m not sure I can explain my method well or whether it would be useful for everyone. 1) Background knowledge is very important. When you already have a lot of knowledge about a subject, you already know how to structure/organize the information, you can skip over what you already know, you can quickly integrate new information by adding it logically/incrementally to the old, and you can easily fill in any blanks or make educated guesses about what’s coming next with what you already know. Although I have natural talent in verbal ability, I became a faster and faster reader over time as my knowledge base expanded, so it’s something that takes time and experience, but the pay off is satisfying if you’re patient enough to stick with deepening your expertise.

2) Get in the habit of NOT reading every single word. In English at least, not every word contains important content, so you have to learn to quickly pick out key words and put them together to grasp the overall meaning of the sentence. It is usually the nouns, verbs, and judgment/argument related words that are most important for grasping the meaning. Reading comprehension comes with practice as experience allows you to bring to mind all the various meanings/connotations of words more quickly. Needless to say, building vocabulary is a must because encountering too many new words/jargon will slow you down.

3) When you don’t have enough background knowledge to know the logical structure of the info, then scan all the material first to get the overall structure. Reading without knowing the logical structure means that you’ll feel bombarded by seemingly meaningless details and easily forget them because you haven’t organized the information. You can usually obtain a good idea about the logical structure by reading the titles/headers/subheaders, the intro and conclusion, the first/last sentences of each paragraph, and/or the bolded/emphasized words or sections. Once you have the overall structure, then your careful reading fleshes out the details and you’ll remember them better because they are built into a sturdy framework. I always skim everything before I start reading carefully. I’ve found that some students are stubborn in skipping this step because, superficially, it seems to take more time, but it actually saves time by allowing you to absorb information more efficiently.

4) A lot of people read passively in that they read as though dumping a bucket of facts into the brain, hoping and praying that it doesn’t all leak out before they need it. Information won’t stick well when you haven’t done anything with it. To read actively requires good critical thinking skills. People with good critical thinking skills interact and engage with the reading, e.g. they question it, they look beyond what is stated, they evaluate the statements for validity and soundness, they relate it back to something else, they hypothesize, they speculate about implications/significance, etc. In other words, when you go out of your way to create something personally meaningful out of what you read, you’ll remember it better.

5) Different people have different reading goals - speed and retention are two different goals. I am not a student who needs to know and remember all the details of what I read inside and out, so I value speed of grasping the general meaning over retention of all the details. A student who must pass exams should value retention over speed. When you have one, you must sacrifice the other a bit.

[junkremovalblogs]

Control That Clutter

Would you like to cut the clutter and produce a more peaceful, serene environment for yourself and the other people in your life? Here are some suggestions, tricks, and perception adjustments that ought to be quite useful in your journey.

* 1 location to commence would be with a significant home purge. Or, if that seems out of your reach, try a purge of a smaller area — one room, one closet, or 1 shelf. Initial decide where to begin, whether or not you are working on the whole home or just an area. I suggest selecting what’s most embarrassing, what’s bothering you probably the most, what’s most visible, what’s easiest, or what’s hardest — whatever motivates you.

* Then create a list of every single room, area, nook, cranny, cupboard, cabinet, closet, shelf, and box so that you don’t get overwhelmed by attempting to do too a lot at once, can maintain track of where you’ve been, and can feel the satisfaction of checking off spaces as you finish them. Bear in mind that it’s a journey — take your time. Issues didn’t accumulate over night, and they will not leave that swiftly either, but you’ve taken a critical initial step.

* After you’ve a list, empty your chosen area and follow this process…

1. Put all like items into piles (e.g., pots, mittens, Legos, cosmetics, hockey equipment).

2. Weed out what you no longer require, use, or love.

3. Give every space a definition to ensure that you know what belongs there (e.g., the wall where the long-handled yard tools hang, the shelf for gardening books, the box for mittens)

4. Decide where the “keepers” will now reside. Be sure to make the homes logical, accessible, and secure.

5. Use containers as infrastructure to make the most of your space — especially vertically!

6. Label containers to ensure that you and your family know where things go.

7. Make a commitment to maintain the order you’ve created daily, due to the fact clutter constantly creeps back in.

* My quite favorite tool of all time (besides a planner that works just correct for any particular individual) is the tickler file (also known as an everyday sorter or other issues). You are able to buy a book format, make 1 out of vertical files, or develop one from a three-ring binder with either paper divider pages or clear-plastic sleeves if you want to go mobile with it. Basically, it’s a book (or a set of files) for the 31 days of the month and also the 12 months of the year. You put papers in it that are related with a specific date, a date you assign, or just something you are pondering. Toward the end of every month, put the items from the next month’s slot into their correct dated slots. Then, each day you pull out what’s within the slot for the next day, and you’re ready to go. It requires only that you put things in there, and that you check it daily — that are very modest prices to pay for the reduction in tension that you will expertise simply because issues appear correct whenever you require them.

* In the event you have trouble deciding regardless of whether to keep some thing, put it in “purgatory”: a box in a far-off place. Label the box having a date that’s six months or a year from now, and note it in your planner or tickler file. In the event you don’t dive into the box prior to then, revisit it on the designated day. You might come across that separation and time have helped you to disengage enough to let the item go. If not, keep it there for an additional six months.

* You can’t buy organizing containers properly until you know what, what size, and just how much of something you have to store — put the horse properly before the cart. Much better yet, repurpose containers that you already have. Even organizing tools can become clutter if you have too a lot of, if they’re a hassle to use, or they do not fit the way you believe, work, or live.

* Get serious about paper: not each art project or school paper that your child has ever brought home is worth keeping. Some undoubtedly are, but not all. Also recycle old magazines and brochures, out-of-date travel data, expired coupons, notices of events that have passed, ancient phone books, and catalogs that have been superseded by newer ones. Space is money, and space is peace of mind. Don’t waste either 1.

* Plan ahead for gift purchases and greeting card mailings by utilizing electronic reminders or a paper planner, and acquire well ahead of time whenever you see something that would be nice for your recipients. Your tickler file could be an excellent aid here!

* Don’t let excuses sidetrack you:

- “It was a gift.” When thinking about purging gifts (or other sentimental objects), ask yourself whether or not it’s the object or the memory that you truly treasure. If it is the memory only, then revisit the memory, perhaps take a picture of the object or write some notes or somewhat story about it, and then let it go. It actually was the giver’s thoughtful intention that counts; the item itself is secondary to the relationship. Don’t confuse objects with relationships. If it is not “you,” put it in the hands of somebody who will use and love it now.

- “It might come in handy someday.” That’s accurate — it may. But are you willing to wait that long? Wouldn’t you rather have the space, light, and order right now?

- “It may well be worth something someday.” Also accurate — but once more, are you willing to wait?

- “If I put it away, I’ll forget I have it.” Store issues in ways that acknowledge this tendency. Use highly visible methods, lots of labels, transparent containers (and label those, too, because what’s visible may possibly not accurately represent the rest of the contents), vertical stackers, and wall racks.

- “I want this to go to a good home.” That’s really valid, but, for example, there’s a limit to how lengthy you want to wait for your niece to move into a new apartment just before giving her your dining table. What’s your space worth even though you wait? And are you certain she even wants the table?

- “I paid very good funds for this!” Yes, you did, but that funds is not coming back unless you sell the item (and even then, you probably will not get what you paid) or donate it and take the tax write-off.

- “It’s still perfectly great (or useful, or gorgeous)…” If it’s so fantastic, why aren’t you utilizing it? Why has it turn into clutter? It’s possibly simply because it is not great or helpful or gorgeous for you, right now. Maintain things because they really support the person you are nowadays, and consider just how much excellent you’re performing by putting your discards into the hands of someone who will use and love them more than you do.

- “It was a bargain.” Was it actually such a bargain if you by no means use it?

- “It will fit after I lose 10 pounds.” That’s true, but if the weight reduction has been a very slow process, then accept and be the individual you might be right now. Do not keep issues that stare at you and make you really feel inadequate.

- “I utilized to be so fond of it.” It is regular and okay that your tastes and interests change over time. Don’t be tied to the past by objects that are far better off left behind.

- “I’m waiting for it to come back into style.” When it does, it’ll be slightly different, and do you actually need to wait that long? Couldn’t you use that space more productively within the meantime?

* Think about storage areas as falling into four “tiers”:

- temporary: for transient items, like the issues that come and go on any given day

- ready, accessible: for everyday issues that you use quite regularly

- seasonal: for holiday decorations and off-season recreational items, household goods, and clothing

- deep: for keepsakes, heirlooms, and things such as tax records that should be kept, but do not deserve more accessible homes. Ensure that these spaces are climate-controlled sufficient to protect your valuables, and store them in moisture-, water-, dust-, and pest-proof containers.

* In case you have an object of any value for which you can’t come across a purpose, but which you are not fairly ready to discard yet, create a location where you store these items (within reason, of course!). These could be vases, trays, decorative bowls, little boxes, or any other little lovely. Pass them on to somebody else whenever the appropriate moment arrives.

* Each object we own requires something of us: some combination of desiring it, earning the money to buy it (a massive consideration, given that we trade irreplaceable time and life energy for funds), researching and shopping for it, insuring it, cleaning it, repairing it, storing it, moving it around, and finally acquiring rid of it. Make certain each item is worth what it costs you.

You can do this! You can make a large difference inside your daily serenity by way of following these along with other suggestions on cutting clutter and shifting your perceptions toward it. But doing so once and then falling back on old habits will defeat all of the time and challenging work you’ve put in.

So be vigilant. Make it a priority each day to generate homes and put things back in those designated homes, to procedure paper, and to get rid of what you no longer require, use, or love. As you live with the wonderful, streamlined results, you will thank yourself for your efforts and will likely be motivated to keep up the very good, liberating work.

[squidinkwriting]

Essay writing

Common mistakes

1.       Doesn’t keep to title

2.       Poor structure

3.       Too descriptive

4.       Not enough critical writing

5.       Not concise

Stages of essay writing

1.       Think about title/question

2.       Gather & organise info/ideas

3.       Get something down

4.       Write a first draft

5.       Review after feedback/reflection

6.       Produce a final draft

title

1.       Split into 3 sections

2.       Topic

3.       Focus point- specific “what about” broad topic, key terms, perspective

4.       Instructional verbs- what should you do in essay

What are you being asked to do?

1.       Discuss – investigate/examine argument, sift through evidence, give reasons for/against

2.       Assess – decide on importance of + give reasons for

3.       Evaluate- make an appraisal of worth of something

essay question

What advantages + disadvantages does social media present to modern writer

Topic- social media

Focus Point- modern writer

Instructional verbs- identify advantages + disadvantages

Gathering ideas

Brainstorming- gather ideas, no particular order

Outline plan- rate ideas 3* for key ideas, 2* for important points, 1* for background points

Use your plan to guide your research

Research

Find wall street journal article on pewdiepie

Bbc article on shane dawson jake paul video series

Efficient reading

Make intelligent decisions, based on initial planning, which sources to target

Read with a purpose

Systematic note taking- record important info, with referencing (page numbers, direct quotes)

First draft

focus is on title/question, how you’ve interpreted it

Core ideas

From research identify any points missed + include them

Delete anything that now seems unimportant

Write out central idea + main line of reasoning

Headings

List headings + sub-headings

Devise an order of key points

Ideas

Add content + develop topic idea of each paragraph

For each main topic/argument note main information to include + examples / other supporting details

big picture

Use your plan

Keep referring back to big picture + links you made between your ideas

Make sure you answer question

Drafting

Start with body if you are struggling with intro

Take each main idea + write a paragraph about it

Don’t worry about style/spelling at this stage – let ideas flow

For each paragraph include a topic sentence that makes it clear what that paragraph is about. rest of paragraph will include information + evidence related to that topic

Leave space for editing

Write conclusion, summing up content of body

Go back to question periodically

Write introduction – it is easier to say what your essay sets out to do once you have d1 it

Print off a hard copy – help’s with editing

Put draft aside for a day or so – come back to it with a fresh pair of eyes

Structure

1.       Introduction 5%

2.       Body 80%

3.       Conclusion 15%

Introduction

Tells reader how you will answer question:

comment on title or topic of essay

define or explain any difficult or ambiguous terms in title

direct reader by stating which aspects of topic you intend to cover + why

Body

Each paragraph should contain 1 big idea

Paragraph 1

intro idea

define concepts

give an argument

discuss and give evidence

make a final point

Paragraph 2 + other paragraphs

first sentence links paragraph to previous paragraph then

Each paragraph should have:

A topic sentence

An argument- explanation of your point

Evidence. Most of time, your point should be supported by some form of evidence from your reading, or by an example drawn from subject area.

Discussion. Don't just leave evidence hanging there, analyse it. Comment on any implication/significance/impact.

Concluding sentence. Finish with critical conclusion you have drawn from evidence.

Critical Writing

Being analytical is about breaking things (situations, practices, problems, statements, ideas, theories, arguments) down into their comp1nt parts.

Being critical is about not accepting things at face value, but evaluating them i.e. making reas1d judgements about how valid, effective, important, relevant, useful + worthwhile they are.

Ask lots of questions of everything you read, observe, hear, experience + do to probe beneath surface, looking for reasons, explanations + motives.

Argumentative + evaluative writing styles.

Argumentative Writing

To argue a case/point of view, to influence reader’s thoughts/actions

State your position clearly + concisely.

Use a clear line of reasoning to support your position.

Give reliable, relevant, valid + convincing evidence/examples to support your reasons.

Consider + respond to possible arguments against.

Try not to sit on fence – show there are different arguments but make clear which you find most convincing.

Evaluative Writing

Comparing - finding points of similarity.

Contrasting – finding points of difference.

Evaluating significance of similarities + differences. Do they matter? Do they have important implications for which model should be used? How did you decide what was significant?

Making a judgement - Give reasons for your opinion, based on evidence.

Showing your criteria. Show what criteria you used to arrive at your opinion – e.g. data, research evidence

Get balance right – compare like with like + give equal information + evidence to both.

Using personal experience

Do not use as your main evidence unless you’re specifically asked to do so.

Points to consider when including personal experience:

How typical is your experience? (Any research d1? Any relevant reports or articles?)

How does your experience compare with other people’s?

How relevant is it?

How does it link to theories you have studied?

How does it support or contradict theories + views you have studied?

Can any lessons be drawn from it?

Can any valid generalisations be drawn from it?

Personal writing uses different language:

“I found that” rather than “It was found that”

(More emotional, subjective, intuitive + anecdotal)

Conclusion (15%)

Draw everything together

Summarise main themes

State your general conclusions

Make it clear why those conclusions are important / significant

prove that you have answered whole question

make recommendations if applicable

Do not introduce new material

In last sentence, sum up your argument very briefly, linking it to title

Editing

Structure + content:

Does main body do what introduction says it will do?

Is it clear what each paragraph is about? (Highlight topic sentence, sum up topic in margin)

Is every paragraph relevant to question?

Is everything in paragraph relevant to main “topic”?

Is there enough in each paragraph to support “topic”?

Is anything repeated/superfluous?

Is everything in right place?

Are sentences in each paragraph in right order?

Does every paragraph relate clearly to others? (see useful linking words h+out)

Submit your piece in canvas

You will be assessed according to following:

ability to clearly articulate ideas using technically accurate prose

Attention to detail (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc)

ability to draw upon at least four examples of secondary reading to support ideas

An awareness of contemporary issues + arguments surrounding social media

ability to present a balanced argument supported by secondary reading that offers a reas1d conclusion

Final Polish

Check again

Check you have conformed to required presentation standards

Give yourself time between finishing essay and submitting online

  What advantages + disadvantages does social media present to the modern writer?

Advantages

·         Spread word about your work (marketing)

·         Provide a creative outlet

·         Interact with fans

·         Get feedback

·         Humanises you

Disadvantages

·         Interact with haters- easy for people to judge you

·         Self worth is linked to numbers

·         you put your personality online as well as your work- hard to separate what you do with who you are, could make you seem unprofessional if you post certain things that companies you want to work with might not want to associate with

·         Harassment/non-constructive criticism

·         Plagiarism

·         Might be harder to rebrand/move into other ventures if you are known for doing one genre/one field of work- everything stays on the internet, can lead to consequences later on

·         Highlights reel- might feel pressured to post when behind the scenes you just want time off/you don’t want to interact with anyone that day

·         Not getting on with work because you’re distracted by social media

 Find wall street journal article on pewdiepie

Bbc article on shane dawson jake paul video series

Books about the publishing industry- also article on Zoella ghostwriting

Articles on the james gunn incident- #cancelled movements

JK Rowling twitter

Brooklyn 99 social media, promoting their content

Blake lively changing her Instagram to fit with her latest movie- follows only people with her character’s name

Social media of a particular author/content creator/blogger- to talk about branding e.g. megan ellaby, mdwap

Twitter trending page

Meaning in the age of social media by Ganaele Langlois

[makeupartistinmumbai-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add importance=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[mumbaipunetaxiservices-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add WikiProject Green Bay Packers to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[clearperception-blog1]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add class=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[hotelregalenclave-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add WikiProject Green Bay Packers to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

class=???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[packersandmoversinsurat-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add WikiProject Green Bay Packers to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

class=???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[rooprangdecorators-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add importance=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

class=???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[mumbaipunetaxi-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add class=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[puneshirditaxi-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add class=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[packersandmoversinakola-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add WikiProject Green Bay Packers to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[webdesigncompanyinmumbai-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add class=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

WikiProject Green Bay Packers

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[igcsecoachingclassesinandhe-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add importance=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

class=???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai

[avishkarclasses-blog]

Cargo Website Development

Cargo  Website Development

Assessing articles under the scope of the Green Bay Packers Wikiproject is needed to help organize and address the quality of Packers-related articles of Wikipedia. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Green Bay Packers articles by quality and Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance.

See also the general assessment FAQ. Generic FAQ 

1. What is the purpose of the article ratings?

The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add GreenBayPackersProject to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a GreenBayPackersProject template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the WikiProject Green Bay Packers is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. 7. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 8. Where can I get more comments about an article? People at Wikipedia:Peer Review can conduct a more thorough examination of articles; please submit it for review there, or ask for comments on the main project discussion page. 9. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. 10. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! 11. What if I have a question not listed here? If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.

Add importance=??? to the talk page of articles within our scope and assess the class and importance. When adding the Green Bay Packers template, please consider adding the WikiProject National Football League, if necessary. If there are multiple WikiProjects banners, please use WikiProjectBannerShell to better manage the banners.

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Green Bay Packers project banner on its talk page:

class=???

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

The following values may be used for the importance parameter. Importance is a lot more subjective and less set in stone. Please remember though that this is the importance scale for the Green Bay Packers, not overall importance (An example is Kurt Warner, who is a highly important article to the NFL or the Rams, but is low-importance to the Packers because he had to significant impact while part of the Packers).

Category:Green Bay Packers articles by importance

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Green Bay Packers articles and articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Green Bay Packers articles. The class and importance should be assigned according to the quality scale below. -->

WikiProject article quality grading scheme WikiProject article importance scheme

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it or feel that an article has been wrongly assessed, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.

Add new requests above

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.

  (Redirected from Movers and packers) Early movers from 1885, Montréal, Québec Movers in Salt Lake City, 1911 Moving van and lift, Germany, 2007

A moving company, removalist or van line is a company that helps people and businesses move their goods from one place to another. It offers all inclusive services for relocations like packing, loading, moving, unloading, unpacking, arranging of items to be shifted. Additional services may include cleaning services for houses, offices or warehousing facilities.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 40 million United States citizens have moved annually over the last decade.[1] Of those people who have moved in the United States, 84.5% of them have moved within their own state, 12.5% have moved to another state, and 2.3% have moved to another country.[2]

See also: Cost of moving house in the United Kingdom

In the U.S. and Canada, the cost for long-distance moves is typically determined by the weight of the items to be moved, the distance, how quickly the items are to be moved, and the time of the year or month which the move occurs. In the United Kingdom and Australia, the price is based on the volume of the items rather than their weight. Some movers may offer flat rate pricing.

The use of truck rental services, or simply borrowing similar hardware, is referred to as DIY moving. Typically, the parties who're moving borrow or rent a truck or trailer large enough to carry their household goods and, if necessary, obtain moving equipment such as dollies, furniture pads, and cargo belts to protect the furniture or to facilitate the moving process itself.

The moving process also involves finding or buying materials such as boxes, paper, tape, and bubble wrap with which to pack boxable and/or protect fragile household goods, and to consolidate the carrying and stacking on moving day. Self-service moving companies offer another viable option: the person moving buys space on one or more trailers or shipping containers. These containers are then driven by professionals to the new location.

Nowadays moving companies provide transit insurance that covers the damages to moving objects.

Romances between two characters who canonically hate each other also occur. It's often interpreted that the characters share sexual tension between each other.

Another example of non-conventional shipping is in the Homestuck fandom, which introduced three new shipping categories: Kismesissitude or hate-love (a deep-rooted rivalry), Moirallegiance (a deep, very powerful platonic friendship), and Auspisticism (a three-person relationship created between two would-be rivals and a peer mediator). Those in the Homestuck fandom refer to the usual romantic relationship as matespritship[13].

Daria fandom was marked through its entire run by shipper debate. From the series' first season, the main conflict was over whether the title character, Daria Morgendorffer, should have a relationship with Trent Lane, a slacker rock-band frontman, whom Daria met through his sister, Jane. A common argument against this possible outcome was that such a development would signal a turn away from the more subversive aspects of Daria's character, such as bitter criticism of romantic relationships, and thus the show.

The show's writers responded[citation needed] by having Daria develop a crush on Trent. Trent, however, remained involved with his off-and-on girlfriend Monique, who immediately became a target of shipper ire. The crush ended in the third season's finale, "Jane's Addition", when Daria realized that Trent could never satisfy her in the long run.

That same episode introduced Tom Sloane, a charming and intellectual son of privilege. Although Tom became Jane's boyfriend, threatening Daria and Jane's friendship in the process, Daria and Tom warmed up to each other throughout the fourth season, leading up to its finale, "Dye! Dye! My Darling," broadcast August 2, 2000.[14] With Jane and Tom's relationship in crisis, a heated argument between Daria and Tom led up to a kiss in Tom's car. In the TV movie Is it Fall Yet?, Daria decided to begin a relationship with Tom, and Daria and Jane patched up their friendship.

This caused an instant uproar, and conversation now turned to whether Tom was more appropriate than Trent had been. The debate was satirized by the show's writers in a piece on MTV's website.[15]

In interviews done after the series' run, series co-creator Glenn Eichler revealed that "any viewer who really thought that Daria and Trent could (have) a relationship was just not watching the show we were making,"[16] Tom came about because "going into our fourth year... I thought it was really pushing credibility for Daria to have only had one or two dates during her whole high school career," and "teaser" episodes like "Pierce Me" were "intended to provide some fun for that portion of the audience that was so invested in the romance angle. The fact that those moments were few and far between should have given some indication that the series was not about Daria's love life."[17]

The Harry Potter series' most contentious ship debates came from supporters of the prospective relationship between Harry Potter and his close female friend Hermione Granger, supporters of Hermione having a romantic relationship with Draco Malfoy, a primary antagonist, and supporters of Hermione ending up instead with Ron Weasley, close friend of both Harry and Hermione. Author J.K. Rowling appeared to try to tamp down the possibility, stating at one point that Harry and Hermione "are very platonic friends".[18]

Another alternative was of Harry ending up with Ginny Weasley, Ron's younger sister, whose obvious crush on him served as a plot-line starting in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Hermione informs Harry that Ginny has "given up" on him. In the subsequent Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, however, Harry develops a crush on Ginny, convinced that he has missed his opportunity with her. In the end Ginny turns out to never have given up on Harry after all, but merely taken Hermione's advice to try to date other boys to boost her self-confidence. Though their romantic relationship becomes one of the few sources of comfort in Harry's difficult life, he makes a decision to end it for fear that Voldemort would learn of it and target Ginny. Rowling later commented that she had planned Ginny as Harry's "ideal girl" from the very beginning.

An interview with J.K. Rowling conducted by fansite webmasters Emerson Spartz (MuggleNet) and Melissa Anelli (The Leaky Cauldron) shortly after the release of Half-Blood Prince caused significant controversy within the fandom. In the interview, Spartz stated that Harry/Hermione fans were delusional, to which Rowling responded that they were "still valued members of her readership", but that there had been "anvil-sized hints" for future Ron/Hermione and Harry/Ginny relationships, and that Harry/Hermione shippers needed to re-read the books. This incident resulted in an uproar among Harry/Hermione shippers, some of whom announced that they would return their copies of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and boycott future Harry Potter books, leveling criticism at Spartz, Anelli, and Rowling herself. Many of them complained that both sites had a Ron/Hermione bias and criticized Rowling for not including a representative of their community. The uproar was the subject of an article in the San Francisco Chronicle.[19]

Rowling's attitude towards the shipping phenomenon has varied between amused and bewildered to frustrated. In that same interview, she stated:[20]

The release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in July 2007 saw an epilogue, nineteen years after the events at the focus of the series, where Harry and Ginny are married and have three kids, Lily, James, and Albus, and Ron and Hermione are also married and have two, Rose and Hugo. This has been received negatively by some fans, especially those who ship non-canon pairings. A result has been the "EWE" tag added to the summaries of fan-fiction, meaning "Epilogue, What Epilogue?"[citation needed]

Harry/Hermione shippers were somewhat vindicated in an interview with Rowling in February 2014 in Wonderland Magazine in which she stated that she thought that realistically "in some ways Harry and Hermione are a better fit [in comparison to Ron and Hermione]" and that Hermione and Ron had "too much fundamental incompatibility." She stated that Hermione and Ron were written together "as a form of wish fulfillment" as way to reconcile a relationship she herself was once in. She went on to say that perhaps with marriage counseling Ron and Hermione would have been all right.[21] She also went on to say in a talk at Exeter University that Harry's love for Ginny is true,[22] thereby denying any canon relationship between Harry and Hermione.

The 1995–2001 action/fantasy TV series Xena: Warrior Princess often saw "shipping wars" that turned especially intense due to spillover from real-life debates about homosexuality and gay rights.

Shortly after the series' debut, fans started discussing the possibility of a relationship between Xena and her sidekick and best friend Gabrielle. Toward the end of the first season, the show's producers began to play to this perception by deliberately inserting usually humorous lesbian innuendo into some episodes. The show acquired a cult following in the lesbian community. However, Xena had a number of male love interests as well, and from the first season she had an adversarial but sexually charged dynamic with Ares, the God of War, who frequently tried to win her over as his "Warrior Queen." Gabrielle herself had once had a male husband, and his death deeply affected her.

According to journalist Cathy Young, the quarrel between online fans of the show about whether there should be a relationship between Xena and Gabrielle had a sociopolitical angle, in which some on the anti-relationship side were "undoubtedly driven by bona fide bigotry", while some on the pro-relationship side were lesbians who "approached the argument as a real-life gay rights struggle" in which "denying a sexual relationship between Xena and Gabrielle was tantamount to denying the reality of their own lives".[23] She added:

In 2000, during the airing of the fifth season, the intensity and sometimes nastiness of the "shipping wars" in the Xena fandom was chronicled (from a non-subtexter's point of view) by Australian artist Nancy Lorenz in an article titled "The Discrimination in the Xenaverse" in the online Xena fan magazine Whoosh!,[24] and also in numerous letters in response.[25]

The wars did not abate after the series came to an end in 2001. With no new material from the show itself, the debates were further fueled by various statements from the cast and crew. In January 2003, Lucy Lawless, the show's star, told Lesbian News magazine that after watching the series finale (in which Gabrielle revived Xena with a mouth-to-mouth water transfer filmed to look like a full kiss) she had come to believe that Xena and Gabrielle's relationship was "definitely gay."[26] However, in the interviews and commentaries on the DVD sets released in 2003–2005, the actors, writers and producers continued to stress the ambiguity of the relationship, and in several interviews both Lawless and Renee O'Connor, who played Gabrielle, spoke of Ares as a principal love interest for Xena. In the interview for the Season 6 episode "Coming Home", O'Connor commented, "If there was ever going to be one man in Xena's life, it would be Ares."

In March 2005, one-time Xena screenwriter Katherine Fugate, an outspoken supporter of the Xena/Gabrielle pairing, posted a statement on her website appealing for tolerance in the fandom:

China Shipping Development (SEHK: 1138, SSE: 600026) is a Chinese shipping company with its headquarters in Shanghai. The company is listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.

The company produces, pursues and sells as a shipping company ships worldwide. China Shipping Group Company, founded on the 1 July 1997, is the holding company of China Shipping Development. Among the rest, the companies China Shipping Container Lines und China Shipping Haisheng also belong to the Parent company. The main business focus of the company involves coastal, ocean and Yangtze River cargo transportation, ship leasing, cargo forwarding and cargo transport agency, purchase and sale of ships, repair and development of containers, ship spare parts purchase and sale agency, consultancy and transfer of shipping technology.[1]

Best Website Desinging Companies in India are as follows:-

     1.       http://troikatech.co/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 2.       http://brandlocking.in/ 3.       http://leadscart.in/ 4.       http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 5.       http://webdesignmumbai.review/ 6.       http://webdevelopmentmumbai.trade/ 7.       http://wordpresswebsites.co.in 8.       http://seoservicesindia.net.in/ 9.       http://priusmedia.in 10.   http://godwinpintoandcompany.com/ 11.   http://clearperceptionscounselling.com/ 12.   http://gmatcoachingclasses.online/ 13.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/ 14.   http://troikaconsultants.com/ 15.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 16.   http://webdesignmumbai.trade/ 17.   http://troikatechservices.in/ 18.   http://brandlocking.com/wp-admin 19.   http://kubber.in/ 20.   http://silveroakvilla.com/ 21.   http://igcsecoachingclasses.online/ 22.   http://priusmedia.in/ 23.   http://troikatechbusinesses.com/

Call them for Best offers India and International.

Read More

Contact Details

404, B-70, Nitin Shanti Nagar Building,

Sector-1, Near Mira Road Station, 

Opp. TMT Bus Stop, 

Thane – 401107

NGO Website Designing 

Troika Tech Services

WordPress Development Company in Mumbai