#(which is an entirely different topic and ethical debate)

[the-commonplace-book]

god I'm going to have to start putting "questionable mental health rep" warnings on my Tears of Themis streams this game's on thin fucking ice

[lisafication]

Digging Graves for your Morals; Or, The Ethical Problem of Outlawry

Hello, yes, I am here again. This one is shorter, I swear (it’s under four thousand words, even). If this is the first post from me you’re seeing, this is a follow-up to my prior essay posted here on the game The Coffin of Andy and Leyley, although it should be able to mostly stand alone.

At the end of my last essay, I touched on both the game’s nearly uncompromising moral scepticism and relativity, but I didn’t really dig into it. I outlined that the game only textually frames actions as ‘morally bad’ in the context of a morality set by the society and the world that has treated them as no better than farm animals raised for the slaughter. Well, I have a lot to say on the topic of ethics on the topic of The Coffin of Andy and Leyley, so buckle in, this one’s going to talk about the social contract, moral scepticism and everyone’s favourite topic: Mrs. Graves.

As usual, this was originally posted and formatted for on Sufficient Velocity and you can perhaps more easily read it there. Spoilers abound, and my content warning from last time still applies.

She’s not too hot on either ethics or her mother

The Meat of the Matter

Since a lot of this is optional or otherwise missable information, let’s review the premise the game gives us. If you’re already aware of all of this, I apologise, it won’t take long.

First off the bat, the quarantine at the start of the game was a hoax-driven money-making scheme of which you can pick up more-or-less all the relevant details of. This is entirely missable and by the time it’s possible to discover, our protagonists have better things to dwell on and have dialogue about, so I’ll give you a summary of what you can deduce from reading the notes and thinking about it.

The quarantine is an organ harvesting operation, as per some documents you can discover in the wardens’ office. They entrap the residents, test their blood types and starve to death those they deem surplus to requirements — alternatively the starvation itself could be their method of ‘preparing the harvest’, there’s evidence in both directions and it hardly matters — harvesting the organs of the others for sale. As our protagonists are AB-typed, the ‘universal recipient’ or ‘most selfish blood type’, they’re some of the first on the chopping block.

If you read through the newspapers and the documents in Mr. Washing Machine’s car, you can discover that ultimately ToxiSoda are responsible, and a similar thing is happening in a different city under the guise of a ‘chemical leak’.  Should you further investigate matters, you will find mentions of the ‘man behind it all’, the doctor, or the Surgeon, as the fandom have been referring to him — you may recall Mrs. Graves mentioned someone similar! Yeah, he’s the guy who runs ToxiSoda, who are themselves partners with the water company that faked the parasite outbreak in the first place.

It’s all a life insurance scam, apparently

How much the details of the operation matter is something open to interpretation — it might just be something for players to figure out and Episode 3 will not cover the Surgeon at all, or he might play a major part; it's not particularly relevant to this essay. What matters is that it happened at all — indeed, it’s fairly easy to justify Ashley and Andrew in everything they did in Episode 1 (flashbacks aside), arguing that if they’d made any other decisions they’d have died — an argument that the victims dug their own graves, even if the Graves siblings put them in them. How correct that is is a matter of debate, but that you can make the argument at all matters, and we’ll be returning to this later. In my last essay (and again in the introduction here), I made an analogy to farm animals, raised without love and for slaughter. Let’s put a pin in the ‘for slaughter’ part for now and take a look at the ‘without love’ part. 

That’s right, it’s time to meet the parents.

As Andrew notes, there are significantly more compelling reasons for you to say that

They Fuck You Up, Your Mum & Dad

They really do. 

Our charming protagonists are, as with many things depicted in this game, an exaggerated, almost farcical example of this phenomenon — one that’s just grounded enough to still feel very real, just like the siblings themselves. 

The late and lamentable Mrs. Graves is just the same: originally a teen mother, hopelessly out of depth with two difficult children — even if one was good at masking it — and an unreliable, emotionally unavailable (at least to their children) partner who can’t hold down a job, ends up foisting them off on each other and doing a Parental Negligence because she simply Cannot Cope. That’s the real part. The part where she gets paid off by an organ harvesting operation to leave them to die, that’s the borderline-farcical exaggeration that throws all the nooks and crannies of her character into sharp relief.

Mrs. Graves does not have a good relationship with either of her kids. Having self-admittedly fobbed the job of raising Ashley off on her son, to the degree that they did not even celebrate her birthday as kids, both of them hold differing degrees and types of resentment for her.

For Ashley, it’s hate — perhaps not quite so clear cut as that, as it’s her that calls for the eulogy and she shows some potential signs of discomfort while cleaning up her parents’ corpses, but by and large, it’s fairly simple and straightforward, as usual for Ashley. The sentiment is not exactly unreturned, either.

This brings Ashley’s heart great delight!

The most clear incident raising her from everyday ‘neglectful’ to ‘wow she wanted nothing to do with this kid’ is the optional ‘birthday cake’ scene, obtained by finding the present in Ashley’s first ‘transitory world’ dream, in which we see Ashley’s birthday  and the founding of a lemon cupcake tradition between Leyley and Andy. She has received nothing from her family, notes that her ‘friends’ would say they were busy before she even told them the schedule and Andy takes her out to buy cupcakes with his pocket money.

This scene gets a callback in Andrew’s dream later. Just remember to Ask Nicely, rather than Kill Her.

Parents of the year, everyone.

So with Ashley it’s as straightforward and obvious as she herself is — she hates her mother, her mother hates her. With Andrew, as with Andrew himself, it’s a fair bit more complicated. His mother is a much more nuanced figure, who is believable in her role as an unfortunate teen parent who was trying her best. He has a degree of trust in her against, seemingly, his own good judgment In her conversation with Andrew, she acknowledges her fault in raising him and seemingly sincerely tries to offer him a ‘way out’, an olive branch.

I think many people have had relationships where they might say this

This scene in particular intrigues me, because she is acknowledging fault in a way that Andrew strictly avoids doing — and well, there’s nothing Andrew likes more than a good way to avoid acknowledging any fault of his own. With her dominant relationship over their father as a model for Andrew to draw comparisons to his own relationship with Ashley with, it’s no surprise that the narrative resonates with him to the point of ‘Accept’ being many people’s first completion.

Of course, that’s not all there is to it. There is a fascinating contrast with her later conversation with Ashley, where she — despite accusing Ashley of brainwashing Andrew — refers to Leyley and Andy as ‘two psychos’ and states that she always knew they were responsible for Nina’s death and that, implicitly, they owe her for not turning them in. 

There's something about mother-daughter relationships here that I just do not have the time or reading to dig into, unfortunately.

Meanwhile, when Andrew interrogates her on her possession of their death certificates, she has… an interesting, plausible story about a life insurance scam and claims that she really did think they died in the fire, implicitly denying the claim that she sold them. It’s entirely possible that she’s describing the details of the ‘scam’ correctly — you can even buy that she genuinely does care for Andrew in some way, if not Ashley, but her claim about being an honest, grieving parent shocked at their deaths… doesn’t add up?

This is a very normal reaction to your supposedly dead children showing up in your house.

As Andrew himself notes after hearing her story, she’s full of shit. This gets into speculation, because there are a few ways to read this, but the most plausible ‘gist’ is that she and her partner were paid off in money and jobs to not raise a fuss — the surgeon she mentioned is almost certainly the founder of ToxiSoda, remember?

The overwhelming difference in presentation between how she speaks to Andrew and Ashley invites investigation — and when Andrew turns down her offer and tells her he isn’t interested in her offer in Decline, her reaction isn’t… despair, it’s shock — and well, there’s a good reason for that.

Why do you think she did it in the first place?

This is the happiest we see her

Well — it’s so she can finally fit into society. That white picket fence, that idyllic 1950s life — hell you can call it the American Dream. She wants that, or as close to it as she can get — the working-class teen mother, living in poverty, aspiring to the middle-class. It’s a very common, very real and very grounded motivation.

And to that end, she effectively sold off her children. It’s no wonder she can’t fathom why Andrew wouldn’t choose the same.

That’s the part that makes you think — just like the deaths in Episode 1, well- maybe the siblings are justified here, too. It’s a weaker argument, but it’s still one you can make under many common moral paradigms today — what goes around comes around, all that jazz. Just look at how awful she was to Ashley.

She’s finally found what she’s been striving for.

Here’s the thing, here’s the thing though — what, reasonably, could she have done? Andrew and Ashley briefly highlight this in conversation about Ashley’s ‘friends’ in Episode 1 — was she supposed to fight gunmen to try and break them out? Throw food to the balcony from four stories?

Moreover, as she herself says to Andrew… would anyone really have been able to do better than her in her position? She was seventeen when Ashley was born, living in poverty with a partner who couldn’t even remember Andrew’s name when he was a kid. Anyone would have had difficulty, let alone with these kids.

Her evils are — they’re not any deliberate action, but rather… prompted inaction. She didn’t have the emotional energy, resources or plain capability to properly parent her children, she didn’t have any solutions to their murder of Nina in a state so blatantly hostile to its underclass, she didn’t have a way to connect with Ashley and she took the money rather than fight a futile and likely suicidal battle against a corporation and its armed goons in a dystopian setting.

Ashley, notably, does not deny this.

Her sin is the one we’re all, I think, guilty of — that of not trying hard enough, that of inaction in the face of difficult tasks, of not standing up on principle because it’s just too much that day and you don’t have the spoons, you’ll do it tomorrow (no you won’t). It’s a petty, everyday kind of evil — that of not doing enough. 

Is that enough to condemn her? Certainly, there’s a pretty manipulative read of her that likely has some truth to it — in the locked door in Ashley’s dream in ‘Decay’ you can discover that she has a ‘not-hatched’ tar soul — but consider that lens — the game won’t make up your mind for you, so you’ll need to choose that for yourself.

The dad is interesting in terms of negative space — but he’s mostly important in that he doesn’t matter, so I decided to not fit him in here. He has art, though — just no sprite, because, well, he’s never mattered to either sibling.

The Contract We Call Society

Right, it’s time to get a little bit Theoretical in here. Not much, but a little. Social contract theory is a complex topic with a lot of nuance, much of which I will be eliding in the name of not writing a twenty thousand word paper on semiotics, law, and anthropology, but the short analogy is… the idea that as long as you play by society’s rules, as long as you are a good citizen, a good person, the state, or the community, will take care of you.

In a number of ways, the harshest penalty levied by many historical states and legal codes was not death, but rather the criminal status of outlawry, a practice that’s cropped up a number of times in history — the practice of no longer being protected by the law. This meant one could be killed or worse with impunity — you were no longer protected by mob justice and, while overexaggerated as a term of reference, certain texts from Medieval England refer to outlaws as bearing a wolfshead, ‘for the wolf is a beast hated by all folk’. Never minding that wolves are actually delightful, this was a time when wolves were actively hunted and sold by people — and the same was intended to happen to outlaws. They were ‘fair targets’ as far as society was concerned, no longer to be treated as your fellow citizens.

This was the gravest punishment on the books, for most of these legal codes — something saved for those who had broken the social contract so completely that there could be no turning back (civil outlawry is… a bit different, that’s not the topic here). Among others, a modern critique of the concept is that it offers no incentive for improvement, no incentive to change or to cease harming society — if an outlaw has none of the social contract’s protections, what reason do they have to obey… any of the social contract? If that seems familiar, well, let me ask you this:

What if the state or community fails its end first? What responsibility does the innocent outlaw have to that contract?

It’s an interesting phrasing, that the world is better off.

It’s time to talk about the incest, and part of why it’s there. The cannibalism too, but that’s less impactful here. If you’ve seen me elsewhere, you might have seen me say that the incest is a load-bearing narrative pillar — in large part due to it being a critical facet of the siblings’ relationship, but in another large part due to it being an equally critical part of how the game uses taboo.

A taboo is in this context something that is considered repulsive and to be avoided by society. It’s a more complex term than that — you can also use it for certain sacred actions or utterances that are only permitted to certain people, for example — but that’s what it is here. Swearing, premarital sex, BDSM and murder are, approximately from weak to strong, some example taboos held in modern Anglospheric society. 

Strong taboos are a staple of horror — they shock, they disgust, they draw people’s attention and it’s that last one that’s critical here. Incest is a very strong taboo — while I am absolutely not segueing into its historical context, the very well-established Westermarck effect gives it a certain timelessness and immunity to desensitisation that most other taboos don’t have — murder, to contrast, is a taboo we’re largely desensitised to in modern media and works of modern media have to put in actual work to make a murder seem horrifying — through atmosphere, cinematography, evocative prose etc.

And this is important because the use of taboo I’m covering in this essay is that the incest is used to invite judgment — it is so ingrained as a ‘wrong thing’ in people’s brains almost regardless of background that it forces the player to engage with the work morally. And that’s where the fun starts.

I’ve mentioned before, very briefly, about the juxtaposition of tone between the Burial & Decay endings, contrasting with the very monstrous difference in morality. Burial is remarkably light-hearted — they play around with the drain blockage, they joke about their mother’s personality and this is further exaggerated on the Love path, where Andrew is much more comfortable with casual contact and the two make a game out of how far they can throw their parents’ skulls, the humour is directly contrasted against their abhorrent actions.

I’ll be real Ashley is far more merciful than I, I’m shuddering at the thought of that gunk in my hair

In comparison, Decay is… bleak. I’ve seen it being referred to as being ‘emotionally sandblasted’ and, yeah I think that’s fair — it’s uncomfortable, it’s heavy and it’s just not fun. And this is the route in which, if you chose Trust into Accept, Andrew has bought into the narrative that his mother’s offered — that he can fit just fine into society if he wasn’t stuck, if not for Ashley — the route that ‘fits’ most closely to the social contract, to Andrew feeling the guilt that we think he should and hating the monsters that they’ve become, as the social contract deems them. Given the pains the game takes to attach the player to the protagonists, this normative moral ending is very easily interpreted as the bad ending.

And well, isn’t it?

Thing is, as mentioned above, the social contract has never held up its end for them. The game takes careful pains to point out to a viewer that they’ve never had the life that society promises people, so why do its moral standards apply?

The game invites you to judge the characters, and in the same motion, asks you from what principles you judge them, making a pretty good guess in that, like most people who haven’t spent a large amount of time navel-gazing and reading some very boring books by very dusty old men, they come from the society around you.

Love even has Ashley express this sentiment directly after the incestuous dream — she asks you — well, Andrew, but this is also something for the player to mull over — why this is what’s engaged your morality or sense of revulsion, rather than the desecration, cannibalism or murder.

Andrew and Ashley are both very funny and very fascinating in this scene.

And that’s the framing that it casts all of its own moral judgement in — even the ‘tar-soul’ aspect is… well, it’s unclear what it even means. Mrs. Graves was a ‘not-hatched’ tar soul, after all. Other than that, it’s society and the world being better off without them, rather than any kind of assertion of objective morality. Due to the present of ‘soul colour’, we’ll presumably see the game make some moral statements in Episode 3, but as it stands?

It’s nearly completely morally sceptical, in and of itself — it’s not interested in moral assertions or education, it’s interested in making you question your own morals. Deconstructive (not that kind), rather than dialectic, to be mildly pretentious.

It uses taboo and shock to invite moral judgement, but then uses tone, charm and our instinct to look for the happiest end for our blorbos to get you to recognise that these are principles you yourself brought into the game, rather than any it’s handed you. 

To summarise: you’ve brought these principles in from society, but what do the siblings, the protagonists, the villains to the world, owe society? Enough that they should follow them? It failed them first, after all.

Closing Thoughts

This one is a bit less energetic than the last, tragically — my sleeping schedule is the stuff of nightmares recently, I love windy weather. Wait, no the opposite. Huge thank you to everyone who commented on the last one, you are the wind beneath my wings and the main reason I managed to get this out this week.

This essay is a bit more interpretative than my last one — certainly, there are alternative readings and I’ve been toying with the idea of deliberately taking a reading I don’t like very much and writing from that perspective as a demonstrative exercise recently — mostly that you shouldn’t just take my word for things!

Otherwise, if the last bit at the end seemed murky, I apologise — I did try to write a more detailed version, but firstly, it was three thousand words and secondly, I re-read it the next day and I could not understand what the fuck I was talking about. Personally, I blame Derrida — suffice to say that I strongly recommend playing through it with an eye towards considering culpability, morality and why you think certain characters are more or less forgivable than others, and for what deeds. See what you get out of it.

I managed to keep one particular thread open to wrap up with here —  I try to keep speculation on Episode 3 content to a minimum in the main essays, but it should be fine here — you might have noticed that I refer to Episode 1 and Episode 2 being on something of a spectrum of justifiability, with the siblings’ actions being ‘more’ justifiable in Episode 1 and ‘less’ justifiable — but still justifiable if you try — in Episode 2. 

To continue the thought of the happiest ending being the one in which they step the furthest away from common morality and to further jar the viewers’ sense of morality by contrasting societal morality and blorbo-oriented morality, Episode 3: Burial could continue this trend in having a major victim be someone who, well, has done nothing wrong and isn’t even guilty of bystander syndrome.

I wonder if there’s any good candidates, someone who’s sweet, harmless and will indisputably be an innocent victim…

…I’m sure she’ll be fine

[bozepomagaj]

How to train your dog.

College AU!Trigun (part 3)

Summary: a couple of days pass and you find out that your professor set you up with none other than Nai Saverem to work on a thesis. You, however, decide to make the most of this and finally confront him and show him who's the 'big dog' now with the help of your new friend, Vash.

A/N: I stalled this for far too long for too many reasons but here it finally is! This year is gonna be hectic as I have an undergraduate to do but I'll do my best to stay consistent this time and continue writing this. This one's a bit shorter than the last two parts but I hope that nonetheless people still enjoy it. Like always, criticism is appreciated.

CW: light swearing, mentions of being roofied/drugged

Word count: 1.8k

[part 1] [part 2] [part 3]

You thought everything was going to go smoothly. You thought that your plan was perfect: befriend Vash's friend group, get closer to Vash, and make Nai's life hell. Except, of course, you were never that lucky.

"Can't I just do this by myself?"

Obviously, he'd say that. As rude and brash as ever, however, you had manners so obviously you didn't talk back. Your professor leaned back in his chair sighing in annoyance. He was an older man and it was very clear he was not here to have a debate with you two.

„Listen, the event is in 2 weeks. The topic is very complex and detailed and I don't want you overworking yourself. I gave this assignment to you both because out of everyone here, you two are the only ones who look like their will to live hasn't evaporated yet and seem genuinely interested in what I'm talking about. Not only that but both of you have made some exceptional projects in the past. I need this to be perfect, it's gonna be representing the entire school.“

Open Door Days. The singlehandedly worst and best event every year. Your classes were shortened or simply canceled which was wonderful but then at the same time all the best students were chosen to do all kinds of different projects to „encourage young people to choose this major“.  And of course, you just so happened to be this „best of the best“. This also meant that you'd have to be there, standing for a whopping 8 hours watching annoying high schoolers giggle at you as they eat all the snacks and don't even appreciate all the hard work you've put into these theses.

„Plus, what kind of impression would we leave on the younger generations if we didn't promote teamwork?“

Nai's annoyance was so terribly obvious and irritating. Couldn't he at the very least pretend to be fine with this out of respect?

„Right, my apologies. So the due date is in 2 weeks?“

„A little earlier. We need to submit it by Tuesday so try to get it done by Saturday so I can review it in case there are any mistakes. If you get stuck at any point just come to me and I'll help you out.“

You and Nai both silently nod. The professor hands you 2 large Encyclopedias on the probably largest and most complex topic: bacteriology. Nothing specific, just something from that field which just so happened to be so complex that you could spend at least a week picking which topic to do. In any case, this was a nightmare for both of you. You were responsible and you could get over this silly little grudge but Nai? Oh, he would never. To everyone, he was a force to be feared and reckoned with, terrifyingly intelligent, hard-working with an immaculate work ethic. He took care of his body like it was a sacred temple. Everything about this man oozed with pride and adoration. That was until you got to his shitty personality. At times it honestly felt like you were conversing with a child rather than a grown man. But it was too late to say anything now, with scoffs on both of your faces, you both exited the classroom and you immediately stepped in front of him so he didn't get a chance to run off.

„I need your number. Also, we'll be meeting up at your place cuz it's nicer.“

Quick and straightforward. You learned that this was the best way to make him even listen to you. He cocked his eyebrow and clicked his tongue, a habit he got recently and only did it when he was annoyed.

„Alright. But I expect you not to make a mess of my apartment.“

He handed you his phone and you entered his phone number into yours then entered yours into his. The moment you were done, he snatched the phone from your hands and walked off. You scoffed and yelled after him.

„I'm coming over at 4!“

Whether he heard you or not you really couldn't care less. Your entire walk home was ruined, all you could think about was him and his irritating face, his irritating attitude, his irritating... well, everything at this point. Once you were home all the frustration melted as your dear puppy jumped up on you excitedly. He was honestly a better friend than most humans. It's like he'd always know what you needed. Whether it be silence and some quiet time with his paw resting on your leg while he quietly pants or him dragging you out with his leash in his mouth, urging you to take him on a walk to forget about everything. The only thing was, he was young, healthy, strong, and very much untrained. Plus, as a border collie, he had the energy of not one but five horses. Sure, he was a great source of motivation but sometimes you just couldn't keep up with him. Times like these made you realize why your mom told you that it might be best to leave him at home with them where he could go out and play far more often. You glance over to your living room... ravaged living room, to be more specific. He seemed to have another one of his energy spurts and decided to redecorate everything. Plants on the floor, pillows everywhere, and a couple of pictures broken. You couldn't get mad at him because you knew exactly what you were getting yourself into. Instead with a heavy sigh you send him to your room and go sit down at your computer. You spent some time looking up tutorials and blogs about how to train your dog but most of the time, it was about puppies or saying how the dog should've had prior training when they were younger. Which he didn't have. With a heavy sigh, you finally found a blog on which a young woman complains about having a rather large and active dog who wasn't trained prior and is now a total menace to her and everyone in her household. Huh. Seems like there were some people like you after all.

After spending some time looking through the comments, reading the replies of professionals or just random people who learned how to work with dogs you came to two conclusions:

There was still hope for you and there is still a chance that your big puppy could turn into the greatest boy ever with enough treats and reassurance and you won't have to pay concerning amounts of money for him to receive proper training and number two.

Nai was more similar to a dog than you thought.

You kept thinking about him since you were gonna have to meet him up in.... oh crap, less than an hour!? You decided that it was time to pack your stuff if you wanted to be on time. Unfortunately to you, the apartment he lived in was quite a bit away from yours so you needed to take a bus to there. The neighborhood wasn't unfamiliar to you because Meryl lived in the same apartment complex, her parents knew the couple who owned the place and decided to lower her rent slightly, while she got to live in a fancy apartment. Lucky.

As you wait for the tram (because you managed to miss the bus by a couple of seconds), your bus vibrates. You quickly take it out expecting it to be Meryl but instead, it's an unknown number. You make a face, thinking it is some kind of a scammer, but then again would a scammer really send you a message that says:

„Heard you're coming over :D“

You quickly type up, asking the mysterious person on the other line about their identity to which they immediately respond, almost like they were waiting.

„Did you not save my number? It's Vash :)“

Huh. It seems like you did forget to save his number. You finally see your tram pull up and you quickly jump on, trying to find your spot. Once seated, you start typing:

„yeah srry forgot about it lol“

„It's fine, but are you actually coming over?“

„on the tram rn so yeah, should be there soon“

„Great :D. I'll get some snacks ready.“

Oh, he was so nice. Just as nice as the last time you saw him. This means Nai is going to be positively fuming once he sees you two interact.

The ride to their neighborhood was quick, you played some music to pass the time and with a positive mindset, you skipped over to the apartment complex and walked in (you knew the passcode because Meryl gave it to you numerous times), walking up the stairs up to their apartment. After ringing the small bell you heard some commotion inside and rather than being greeted with Nai's scowl, you were greeted by a big hug from Vash.

„There you are! I already got worried you got lost or something.“

He ushered you to come in and now, that you saw the apartment during the day in all its glory, all you could say is that you were truly in awe. Beautifully decorated with lots of unique flowers and greenery you've never seen.

„Holy crap. I'm guessing you're the one that decorated this place? Cuz my God, it's gorgeous.“

„No, it was me. And since when are you on such good terms with my brother?“

Ah, the man on the hour was finally here. You spot him in the kitchen, a scowl on his face, and he clicks his tongue. Like always. You side-eye him and wait for his dear brother to enlighten him on the situation and the moment Vash opens his mouth, the biggest, most evil grin adorns your face.

„Nai, they're the ones who helped me out the other day. Y'know, when I almost got roofied? They were the ones who dragged me here. Honestly, I can't tell you how grateful I am to them.“

He looks over at you with the biggest smile in the world. Unlike you, he had pure intentions and wanted to show you how grateful he was all the while you were busy watching Nai's face contort, showing far more emotion than he ever has. He looks over to you and the moment he sees your shit-eating grin, it's like you could see the fumes coming out of his ears.

„Well... seems like I misjudged you then. Sorry.“

Sure, he whispered it, sure, you could barely hear him say anything but boy did it feel good to have THE Nai Saverem apologizing to you. And just like one of the commenters on the blog said:

„in order to train your dog properly, you first need to assert dominance and show them that you are confident.“

And it seemed like it was finally time to train this dog properly.

[drawing-cards]

Book Recommendations (Hoodoo)

One of the things that I see the most online is when people ask what books they should read to learn about Hoodoo. An important part of Hoodoo is understanding that your ancestors and spirit guides are the ones you should rely on the most. The books you may come across may be best for learning how to start. Here, I will compose a list of books that I've read. I will put books directly related to the topic and further down will be books useful for hoodoo but not the practice itself.

Sticks, Stones, Roots, and Bones: Hoodoo, Mojo, and Conjuring with Herbs - Stephanie Rose Bird - This book had a ton of useful information for those who are trying to learn the history of hoodoo. Bird does a great job explaining how there are different forms of practice based on geographics and their respective evolutions. You'll find early in the book that she states "Hoodoo is a practice open to anyone who has an interest". This is one of those unfortunate things that contribute to the debate of whether or not hoodoo is a closed practice. Going forward in the book, you find more historical information on things like talismans and tools people would use in or around the slavery period. After that, you find a comprehensive list of rituals you can do. There is a good variety of options you can choose from for typical everyday things. All in all, I thought the book was just OK. The only use that I really got from the book was the historical and talismanic chapters of it. Otherwise, the later sections didn't have any use to me. A lot of the ritual ingredients that you would have to use to complete anything are inaccessible and expensive, which I feel defeats the point of hoodoo given the fact that you use what you have when you can.

365 Days of Hoodoo - Stephanie Rose Bird - I have the same feelings about this book that I have with the previous one. The difference is that this one lacks the historical aspect of the workings in it. The goal of this book is to give you workings to do daily for an entire year. It's a guidebook of hoodoo! Just like I said for the last part, you are pretty much encouraged to go out and buy items for the workings. Geography and economic status are not really considered in this book so doing daily workings doesn't really work out in the long term unless you have expendable money and high commitment. I thought that this book was mediocre in a few ways. My initial impression of the structure of the writing was not good. It's a manual essentially for a spiritual practice that has no set system or order. It is written for anyone interested in the practice, and the explanations in it for each component and tool are good, but encourages you to spend, which is what we don't want. All things considered, the book didn't impress me. But everyone's experience with something will be different.

Hoodoo, Conjuration, Witchcraft, Rootwork; Beliefs Accepted by Many Negroes and White Persons Volume 1-5 - Harry Middleton Hyatt - These books are huge tomes of information recorded by Hyatt through the 1970s and before/after. This series of volumes is highly inaccessible because there are only 300 copies of each in the world. I think these books are a highly valuable resource for anyone who wants to get serious about their practice. Hyatt interviews people from all over the states, asking them about very specific topics in hoodoo ranging from spirits to roots to poisons, etc. Unfortunately, not all of the information is useful, practical, or ethical in many cases, but most of it is. The books go for thousands of dollars online, making them really hard to obtain, but I managed to find volume two in a local college library so they are not impossible to get a hold of. This collection goes very high on my list because of its historical value. As a social scientist, my appreciation for this book is like nothing else. The book is rich in black culture and customs, you see how life was for people in that time period and you even see stories about past generations. Life back then was very different from how it is now, obviously, but there are some similarities you can spot from the interviews.

Mojo Workin' - Katrina Hazzard Donald - I personally haven't got to this book because I just obtained it so it isn't high on my priority list. I have heard from other people that the information in this book is valuable and unique as it isn't a regurgitation of what other authors are putting in their books. I think this would be a very good read for those who want to know more about the history of hoodoo rather than reading a guidebook for how to practice it.

It's a short list of books, admittedly, but I am picky about them. I refuse to read books about hoodoo from Caucasian authors. There is essentially an epidemic of white people who claim to be hoodoos and proceed to mislead people or are outed to be racist. The books listed hold a great amount of useful information for beginners and intermediate practitioners. I cannot express this enough though, there is no structure to what hoodoo is, and to make progress you really have to experiment.

Another list of books that I have are books that practitioners use commonly but are not directly related to the practice itself. These books have historical connections to hoodoo, for example how it was kept hidden during slavery and how the people of the time stayed fortunate and safe.

The Holy Bible - The most common tool you will see from nearly every hoodoo practitioner is the Holy Bible. People will very commonly say that the Bible is something like a spellbook for hoodoo, which is fair. The prayers you can get out of it are immaculate and have been used for specific purposes throughout time. I am not sure if there is anyone who uses the whole bible in their practice but I am sure there are people who use more than proverbs and psalms. If you look online or in some books, you find that the Psalms all have specific uses. Each psalm is prayed once or more and you may have to take extra steps to achieve what you want to get out of it. Food for thought; the bible -specifically catholicism was used to cover up hoodoo practices during its development. It is not uncommon for people to work with or pray to saints and angels in their practice when it comes to hoodoo as they are a part of many people's spirit teams.

The Charmers Psalter - Gemma Gary - is a short book with the psalms and their uses listed respectively. Gary tells the reader the very specific ways rituals can be performed with the psalm you need to use for a specific purpose. It is a very small book with a large amount of information for any practitioner.

The Sixth and Seventh Books of Moses - I am not fully sure if these are counted as books? It is more of a book full of seals that are used for highly specific purposes too. Something you learn in the Hyatt collection is that there are a lot of people who used to include these seals in their mojo bags and other workings to help make a working take its effect faster or better.

That's as far as the list goes for this edition. I am open to answering questions if anyone has any. I have some other lists in the drafts for other practices.

[splort]

In regards to what you asked, the "line" is drawn when real people are involved, such as RPF involving underage people. That is actual CSEM and should not be allowed.

However, fics depicting fictional minors, such as idk Ash Ketchum for example, in sexual situations are not illegal (*US legislation). They are also not hurting anyone, as the characters depicted are not real humans. Many people have many different reasons for writing or seeking out these types of stories. Some for coping (and coping is often times messy and won't always depict the situation as "bad" -- fanfiction isn't an eduction tool, so it really isn't the author's responsibility to teach the unaware that what's happening as bad), some for sexual purposes, some for the enjoyment of drama/dark stories. And while you can have your own opinion on the material in question, and also on those who read said fics, at the end of the day, people should have the right to read/write fictional stories involving these topics for whatever reason they wish. Again, anyone is free to hate this content/these people, but they should have the freedom to create/read it. I personally wouldn't want to take away a survivor's coping mechanism just because it grossed me out, and I couldn't care less if someone got off on this type of content so long as it remains strictly fictional.

I hope this helps/makes sense. Have a good week

Thanks for discussing with me! Some follow up thoughts:

There are as such thing as maladaptive coping mechanisms, and reading/writing content about CSA seems like one of them, in my opinion. Especially content that exists to titillate the reader/writer, which is undeniably what a lot of eroticized CSA fiction is.

I'd also tread carfully on the assumption that because it's fictional, it's legal. American obscenity law basically gives a jury the right to decide whether something is "obscene" or not, and any jury with half of a brain split between them would call such content obscene. The courts have gotten people for loli hentai - drawn, fictional images. The written word is definitely not off the table for the "legal" debate.

And even if it was entirely legal, is it ethical to depict children in sexual situations? It is ethical to write pornographic literature about children, just because they aren't real and therefore, can't be hurt? Is it right to foster an outlet for pedos to get their jollies?

Truth is, I don't know. Mad appreciative of the "exclude" option on Ao3, though. Based of them to add that. Weird that half of kink fic is underaged though 😰

[idreamtofmanderleyagain]

No matter what your stance on AI, as an artist I personally can't stand the debates about skill or lack thereof. It's just...not relevant and does indeed get ugly and gatekeepy, but not exactly for the reasons AI bros make up.

Skill and effort has always been a weird topic when it comes to the arts. There's a lot to unpack philosophically there. And if your argument against AI is that "it's not real art because there's no skill," well, I tend to cringe at that. We all know there are different kinds of skills, and different kinds of art, with different levels of effort. I think its entirely possible to use AI technology to make art and there are artists who have indeed been doing so (but probably not in the ways you think). That doesn't make everything that can be generated from it art, or everyone that who uses it as an artist. But I generally define art as somewhat synonymous with "creating," which is an act that can have varying levels of skill/effort. And I believe anyone can make art regardless of skill/effort.

I think the real topic artists should focus on are the ethical ones in regards to art being used to train the models without consent, the problem of tech development under late stage capitalism, and the impact of AI upon labor, because it's the only conversation that really matters at the end of the day, and it makes the skill conversation feel very petty and pointless.

[leaves-lilies-and-esther]

About Me

Hi! I'm leaves-lilies-and-esther, and this is a post I made to summarize this blog.

I mostly talk about feminism here, although I may occasionally veer into other topics that I'm interested in. In the future I want to study some combination of literature, international relations, or history/social science.

I'm autistic and was diagnosed relatively late. Symptoms present themselves very differently in women and girls, and I only discovered that I had most of them because of posts online. Here's one I made with the resources that helped me if you're curious.

Politically left-leaning by US standards. If you disagree with me you're welcome here- I personally really enjoy having respectful debates. I wouldn’t be considered a true radical feminist because I am not "gender critical", but I agree with their analysis on most other topics.

Reblogging is not an endorsement of their entire blog

My beliefs are:

The sex industry is predatory. Porn tends to be very violent and misogynistic, and is associated with increased domestic violence etc. To paraphrase Catherine MacKinnon: sex work is usually neither sex nor work, but coercion.

Pro-choice is best for women's health. It is not ethical to force anyone to undergo pregnancy due to the physical and mental toll that it requires. Anti-abortion laws typically have casualties- ie, Savita Halappanavar and Olga Reyes. Most late term abortions are fetuses that were wanted (until new circumstances) or cases where women could not have access in time. Therefore, improving access is critical. Reproductive autonomy extends to procedures like getting tubes tied etc.

The government should have policies which help mothers, and women with reproductive autonomy overall. While abortion should be legal, the widespread necessity of it is symptomatic of other structural problems. Ie, we need paid parental leave, larger tax breaks to low-income families with children, crisis pregnancy centers, educational opportunities designed for teen parents, to fix our foster care and adoption systems, comprehensive sex ed, etc. Being pro-choice means that women should have the true choice to keep their baby if they wish.

We should be trans inclusive. Regardless of your beliefs about gender, trans people would probably exist either way (even if you successfully abolish gender, people will still experience dysphoria with their bodies). Transition can be the best informed decision. Statistically, trans inclusion in bathrooms etc make no difference in sexual assault rates. Denying these rights exposes trans people to assault and polices the appearance of cis women- enforcing gender even more strictly.

Traditional gender roles put women at the disadvantage. While there is inherent value in traditional "women's work", gender roles play out to put women in a position of insecurity and dependence (ie, if you want money, then you are the mercy of your husband to give it to you. And if he loses his job or dies, then you're broke). This is only one example.

i/p edit: I'm against both the Netanyahu government and Hamas. I'm not an October 7th apologist (and you shouldn't be either). At the same time, I can recognize that Israel is currently committing a genocide. My ideal world would feature a ceasefire, hostage deal, aid to Gaza, and two-state solution.

I'm happy to discuss my views in further depth, just please be respectful.

[traumasurvivorshelpingsurvivors]

tw mention about generally disturbing stuff

How do I stop being curious/fascinated by "dark" topics?

I get hyperfixations but they're often on "bad" topics, like cannibalism, horror stuff, psychology, unlikely ways to die, and recently learning about famous/well known people that "fell from grace" by doing bad things.

I don't talk to people about this because I know it's triggering and probably not welcome, but I can't help but find these things interesting. I don't feel bad learning about it, but I don't find more "normal" things interesting and it makes me even more socially awkward.

I know a fair bit of it comes from finding ways to express emotions from traumatic things in my past, but I also don't want to make other people uncomfortable. Do you have any advice?

Hi anon,

First of all I just want to say I hear you and you're actually not as alone as you may think. I know even just personally I feel like there's this alluring nature to all things horror, and sometimes for me that can even be for self-triggering reasons. But please know that these interests are actually quite common. Horror as a genre is popular, psychology is fascinating to a lot of people, and true crime has been trending (though the ethics are of course debatable). Personally I think it's okay to consume these things but only a limited amount. If you're bingeing this content, that might indicate a problem.

If you wanted to work towards cutting back how much content you consume of this nature, I would recommend the same strategies used for self-triggering impulses, which is generally to substitute the urge with a healthier alternative. The main thing is to catch yourself wanting to consume that kind of content, and just recognize that you're having that feeling or that desire. Once you can gain that kind of momentary self-awareness, it might be helpful to say to yourself "You know what? I'm going to do something else instead." This could be talking to a friend, doing something you enjoy such as coloring or going for a walk, or doing something very similar to what you were about to do, such as watching a different documentary or reading a different article.

I think that fundamentally we as humans are naturally drawn to the macabre because of a survival instinct to learn what threatens us and who our predators are as much as possible, even if they're entirely fictional. There can be that desire to absorb things that are unsettling or scary, and it may be at least partially due to us just wanting to know what to look out for. I think this is one of the biggest reasons why people consume true crime. While it's understandable to want to get a sense of the world and the dangers in it, it's of course important to not let that consume you.

This is your life, you get to choose how to spend it, and you get to choose what kinds of ideas and emotions you fill it with.

I hope I could help. Please let us know if you need anything.

-Bun

[berryardens]

Synthetic vs. Natural Ingredients in Perfumes: A Deep Dive into the World of Fragrance with Parush Khanna, Perfume Expert and Consultant

Perfume, as an art form, has evolved over centuries, with the use of both natural and synthetic ingredients playing significant roles in the creation of fragrances. For perfume enthusiasts and experts, the debate between synthetic and natural ingredients is a topic of fascination. As Parush Khanna, a renowned perfume expert and consultant, often emphasizes, “Fragrance is not just a scent; it’s an experience.” In this blog, we’ll explore the differences between synthetic and natural ingredients in perfumery, the advantages and challenges of each, and how a balance of both can create timeless fragrances, as seen in brands like Berry Ardens Perfumes.

The Appeal of Natural Ingredients in Perfumes

Natural ingredients have been the backbone of perfumery for centuries. Derived from flowers, fruits, woods, and spices, these ingredients offer a depth and authenticity that synthetic alternatives often struggle to match. As Parush Khanna explains, “Natural ingredients possess complexities and subtleties that are unparalleled. They evolve beautifully over time, creating a scent that feels alive and dynamic.”

Classic floral notes like rose, jasmine, and lavender, as well as woody accords like sandalwood and cedar, have been beloved in perfumes for generations. These natural materials carry an inherent richness that synthetic substitutes can’t always replicate. Their fragrances evolve on the skin, shifting from top notes to base notes, creating a sensory journey that feels organic and multidimensional.

However, there are challenges when working with natural ingredients. One of the main difficulties is their inconsistency. Natural materials are subject to factors like climate and soil conditions, which can cause slight variations in scent from batch to batch. This can make perfume production unpredictable and sometimes costly. For example, the scent of jasmine from one harvest may not be identical to another, creating challenges for perfumers aiming for consistency in their products.

Additionally, natural ingredients can sometimes cause allergic reactions or sensitivities in some individuals. Strong floral or citrus notes, in particular, can trigger skin irritation or respiratory issues. This is a significant consideration for perfume lovers who have sensitive skin or allergies.

The Rise of Synthetic Ingredients in Perfume Making

Synthetic ingredients, which are created in a laboratory setting, offer a wealth of advantages that have revolutionized the fragrance industry. Unlike natural ingredients, synthetic compounds can be engineered to replicate specific scents or even create entirely new ones that would be impossible to achieve with nature alone. Parush Khanna notes, “Synthetic ingredients are essential for innovation in perfumery. They give perfumers the freedom to explore new realms of scent and stability.”

One of the most notable synthetic compounds is the creation of musk. Originally derived from the glands of animals, synthetic musk provides the same rich, animalic scent without the ethical concerns associated with harvesting it from animals. Similarly, synthetic amber, vanilla, and sandalwood allow perfumers to offer these beloved scents at a lower cost and with more consistency, since the supply of natural materials can be limited and costly.

Moreover, synthetic ingredients are highly stable and tend to last longer on the skin than natural ones. Where natural fragrances might fade or change rapidly, synthetics provide more consistency, allowing fragrances to remain true to their original scent for longer periods. This makes synthetic ingredients especially useful for the creation of perfumes that need to withstand varying environmental conditions or remain unchanged over time.

One of the greatest advantages of synthetic fragrances is their reduced risk of triggering allergic reactions. Because they are crafted with precision, many synthetic compounds are less likely to cause the irritation that some natural ingredients can provoke. This makes synthetic fragrances a viable option for those with skin sensitivities or allergies to certain flowers or essential oils.

A Balanced Approach: The Role of a Perfume Expert and Consultant

As both synthetic and natural ingredients bring unique qualities to fragrance creation, the key to crafting exceptional perfumes often lies in finding the right balance. This is where the expertise of a perfume expert and consultant becomes invaluable. Parush Khanna, a leading perfume expert and consultant, works with both natural and synthetic materials to create perfumes that are not only innovative but also timeless.

A skilled perfumer knows how to harness the power of both types of ingredients to create a harmonious fragrance. For example, natural florals can be paired with synthetic musks to create a perfume that has both the depth of nature and the stability of synthetics. By blending the best of both worlds, perfumers can achieve complexity, longevity, and uniqueness in their creations.

One of the brands that exemplifies this balanced approach is Berry Ardens Perfumes. The brand has earned a reputation for blending high-quality natural ingredients with modern synthetic notes to create fragrances that appeal to a wide range of consumers. Whether it’s the comforting warmth of vanilla or the fresh zest of citrus, Berry Ardens expertly combines both natural and synthetic elements to produce scents that are both sophisticated and lasting.

Which Is Right for You: Natural or Synthetic?

The choice between natural and synthetic ingredients often comes down to personal preference and individual needs. For those who value authenticity and the natural world, perfumes made from predominantly natural ingredients offer a connection to nature that can be deeply satisfying. The unique nuances of natural ingredients, the richness of floral and woody notes, and the organic evolution of the scent on the skin are all part of what makes natural perfumes so appealing.

On the other hand, synthetic ingredients offer greater stability, longevity, and versatility. Perfumes crafted with synthetics tend to have a clearer, more consistent scent profile, making them an ideal choice for people who want a fragrance that performs well across different environments and over long periods. They also offer a broader range of creative possibilities, enabling perfumers to design fragrances that would be difficult, if not impossible, to achieve using only natural materials.

Ultimately, many perfume lovers prefer a blend of both, as it combines the best of both worlds—natural ingredients for depth and authenticity, and synthetics for innovation, stability, and longevity.

Conclusion

The debate between synthetic and natural ingredients in perfumery is not a matter of one being better than the other but rather understanding how each can contribute to creating a beautiful fragrance. As a perfume expert and consultant, Parush Khanna’s approach is to use both natural and synthetic materials to craft fragrances that are innovative, sustainable, and uniquely personal. With brands like Berry Ardens Perfumes, the world of scent continues to evolve, offering perfume lovers a wide range of options that cater to every preference and lifestyle.

Whether you prefer the raw authenticity of natural ingredients or the creative potential of synthetics, the most important thing is that your fragrance resonates with you. After all, perfume is more than just a scent; it’s an expression of who you are.

[nitinrajput2922]

Is Artificial Intelligence Smarter Than The Human Brain?

For Quick Enquiry: Click Here

Introduction: The Debate Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence

The debate of whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) is smarter than the human brain has been ongoing, sparking curiosity and concern alike. With AI advancements rapidly changing the way we live and work, it's no wonder people are asking this question. In fact, enrolling in Artificial Intelligence training courses is becoming more common, as individuals seek to understand and work with this groundbreaking technology. But what does it really mean to be "smarter"? Is it the ability to process information faster, or is it the capacity for creativity, emotion, and human connection?

India, with its strong focus on education and technology, is at the forefront of this AI revolution. However, this raises the question: Is AI merely a tool to assist humans, or is it something more? Could it one day surpass human intelligence, and if so, what does that mean for us? These are the questions that this blog seeks to answer.

As we dive into this topic, we'll explore the differences between AI and the human brain, weighing their strengths and limitations. We'll also discuss how AI Training Courses in Noida are helping people prepare for a future where AI plays an even more significant role in our lives. And yes, we’ll sprinkle in some humor—because after all, even if AI takes over the world, we should still be able to laugh about it, right?

Comparing the Processing Power of AI and the Human Brain

1. How AI Processes Information Differently from Humans

The first thing to understand is that AI and the human brain process information in entirely different ways. AI is designed to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately. For example, AI can scan thousands of medical images in seconds, detecting patterns and anomalies that might take human doctors hours or even days to notice. This is why AI And ML Courses in Noida are so valuable—they teach people how to harness this power to solve complex problems more efficiently.

However, while AI's processing power is impressive, it's also limited in some ways. AI doesn't "think" like a human; it doesn't have intuition, emotions, or the ability to make decisions based on gut feelings. AI operates purely on logic and data, which means that while it can be incredibly accurate, it can also miss out on the nuances that make human decision-making so unique. For instance, an AI might be able to calculate the best move in a chess game, but it won't understand the joy of winning or the disappointment of losing.

In India, where technological advancements are rapidly transforming industries, the ability to process information quickly is becoming increasingly important. Yet, as powerful as AI is, it’s essential to remember that its processing capabilities are still fundamentally different from the way humans think and feel. This difference is crucial when considering whether AI can truly be smarter than the human brain.

2. Examining the Speed and Efficiency of AI vs. Human Brain

When it comes to speed and efficiency, AI undoubtedly has the upper hand. Machines can perform calculations at lightning speed, far surpassing the human brain's capacity for rapid data processing. In industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, this speed is invaluable. For example, AI can analyze market trends in real time, allowing businesses to make quick, informed decisions that humans might not be able to achieve as swiftly.

But while AI can process data faster, it doesn’t mean it’s always more efficient. The human brain is incredibly adaptable and can process information in a more holistic way. Humans can take into account not only logic but also context, emotions, and ethics. In contrast, AI can struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of human experiences. This is why AI Coaching Near Me in Delhi often emphasizes the importance of combining AI tools with human oversight to ensure that decisions are both accurate and ethical.

In the Indian context, where industries are becoming increasingly automated, the balance between AI efficiency and human intuition is crucial. While AI can certainly make processes faster, it’s the combination of AI and human intelligence that often leads to the best outcomes. After all, would you trust a machine to make decisions about your life without a human touch? Probably not!

3. Recognizing the Limitations of AI in Complex Problem-Solving

AI is incredibly powerful, but it’s not without its limitations. One of the key areas where AI falls short is in complex problem-solving that requires creativity and innovation. While AI can analyze data and provide solutions based on patterns, it doesn’t have the ability to think outside the box. This is where the human brain shines—humans can come up with creative solutions to problems that AI might not even consider.

For example, in artistic fields, AI can generate music or art, but it lacks the emotional depth and creativity that human artists bring to their work. Similarly, in business, AI can optimize processes, but it often takes a human leader to come up with a truly innovative strategy. This is why AI Training Courses in Noida are so important—they teach people how to use AI as a tool, rather than relying on it to solve every problem.

In India, where innovation is key to staying competitive in the global market, the ability to think creatively is invaluable. While AI can assist in problem-solving, it’s the human brain that often provides the insights and creativity needed to tackle complex challenges. So, while AI may be faster and more efficient in some ways, it’s still no match for the creativity and innovation of the human mind.

Exploring the Emotional and Ethical Dimensions of AI vs. Human Intelligence

1. Considering AI's Lack of Emotional Understanding and Human Connection

One of the most significant differences between AI and the human brain is the ability to understand and connect emotionally. AI can mimic emotions to some extent—think of chatbots that are programmed to respond with empathy—but it doesn’t truly understand feelings. This is why AI Coaching Near Me in Delhi often emphasizes the importance of human interaction in AI-driven environments. While AI can handle the technical aspects, it’s the humans who provide the emotional connection.

For instance, in customer service, an AI chatbot might be able to answer questions efficiently, but it won’t be able to provide the same level of empathy and understanding as a human representative. In healthcare, AI can assist in diagnosing diseases, but it’s the human doctors and nurses who provide comfort and care to patients. This emotional connection is something that AI simply cannot replicate.

In India, where relationships and emotional connections play a vital role in both personal and professional life, the lack of emotional intelligence in AI is a significant limitation. While AI can handle tasks that require logic and data analysis, it’s the human touch that often makes all the difference. So, while AI might be "smarter" in some ways, it still falls short when it comes to understanding and connecting with people on an emotional level.

2. Addressing the Ethical Implications of AI's Decision-Making Abilities

Another critical area where AI and the human brain differ is in ethical decision-making. AI operates based on algorithms and data, which means it can sometimes make decisions that are technically correct but ethically questionable. This is why AI And ML Courses in Noida often include modules on ethics, teaching people how to ensure that AI-driven decisions are fair and just.

For example, in criminal justice, AI algorithms are used to predict crime rates and determine sentencing. However, these algorithms can be biased, leading to unfair outcomes. In contrast, humans can take into account the nuances of each situation, considering not just the data but also the ethical implications of their decisions. This is where the human brain's ability to weigh different factors and make ethical judgments is invaluable.

In India, where ethical considerations are becoming increasingly important in business and technology, the limitations of AI in this area are a significant concern. While AI can assist in decision-making, it’s crucial to have human oversight to ensure that these decisions are ethically sound. So, while AI may be "smarter" in terms of data analysis, it still requires human intelligence to navigate the complex ethical landscape.

3. Balancing the Strengths of AI with Human Creativity and Compassion

The key to making the most of AI is not to view it as a competitor to human intelligence but as a complement to it. While AI excels in processing information and performing tasks efficiently, it lacks the creativity, compassion, and ethical judgment that make the human brain so unique. This is why AI Training Courses in Noida are so essential—they teach people how to use AI as a tool to enhance, rather than replace, human intelligence.

For example, in education, AI can personalize learning experiences, but it’s the teachers who provide the inspiration and guidance that students need to succeed. In healthcare, AI can assist in diagnosing diseases, but it’s the human doctors who provide the care and empathy that patients need. By combining the strengths of AI with the creativity and compassion of humans, we can create a future where both AI and humans thrive.

In India, where the balance between tradition and innovation is often at the forefront of discussions, finding this balance between AI and human intelligence is crucial. While AI can drive efficiency and innovation, it’s the human brain that brings the creativity, compassion, and ethical judgment needed to navigate the complexities of the modern world. So, while AI might be "smarter" in some ways, it’s the combination of AI and human intelligence that truly has the power to change the world.

Conclusion: The Ongoing Debate of AI vs. Human Intelligence

As we’ve explored in this blog, the question of whether AI is smarter than the human brain is not a simple one to answer. While AI has impressive capabilities in terms of speed, efficiency, and data processing, it lacks the emotional intelligence, creativity, and ethical judgment that make human intelligence so unique. This is why AI Coaching Near Me in Delhi is so valuable—it equips people with the skills to harness AI’s power while also recognizing its limitations.

In India, where the future of technology is rapidly evolving, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of both AI and human intelligence is crucial. By combining the best of both worlds, we can create a future where AI enhances human capabilities rather than replacing them. So, while AI might excel in processing data and performing specific tasks with incredible speed, it’s the human brain that provides the creativity, compassion, and nuanced decision-making that truly make a difference.

AI and human intelligence each have their own domains of superiority. AI can manage large datasets and execute complex calculations with precision, but it cannot replicate the depth of human emotion and ethical reasoning. As we continue to advance technologically, it’s essential to remember that AI is a tool designed to support and augment human abilities, not replace them. By embracing this balanced approach, we can ensure that AI serves as a powerful ally, enhancing our lives while preserving the irreplaceable qualities of human intelligence.

Also Read This:-

Top AI Training Institutes (Call Now @9510860860)

What Does The AI For Healthcare Course In NMIMS Teach?

[grant-obrien-eating-an-apple]

First off, your whole pet thing is irrelevant. Euthanization exists and it’s a very ethical way to end the life of an animal that’s suffering. Second, had three barriers not just one. You don’t get to pick and choose what parts of my argument to debate, you debate the whole thing or you don’t debate at all. Mentally disabled people have feelings and lives. Third, I’m not a fucking scientist, it’s not my job to give solutions, it’s just my opinion. Go look up ethical ways to kill animals, it’s not my job to educate you. Fourth, it does indeed suck for the people that kill the animals, so maybe we should find ways to do it less bloodily. How that is? I don’t know, again, it’s not my job to come up with solutions. But a cows life is LITERALLY nothing if it’s not being farmed. Most cows, almost all cows, would not be alive if we didn’t farm them. What we need is ethical treatment of these animals, in their lives and deaths. Fifth, humans are an inherently different topic. You pointed it out yourself that we’re animals, predatory animals, that kill other animals. We’re not going to stop doing that, you will never convince every person to stop eating meat, you’ll never convince MOST people to not eat meat.

Im not against you entirely, I hate carnicism and the current practices involved in the harvest of animal products. But that doesn’t mean that we should get rid of farming animals, it can be a mutually beneficial arrangement.

Since you’re so hard pressed about me giving you an example of an ethical way to kill an animal, I’ll give you the one I’d use. Just fucking shoot it. It’s very difficult for a cow to suffer in death if you blow its brains out with a gun, at the ranch not in a factory. You could even make it enjoyable, get the cow high, I’m sure there’s compounds that can do that for a cow. Then their last moments are enjoyable and their death is unexpected. I guess in your anger and frustration with me you forgot that we’ve been shooting animals with guns since we invented them.

Furthermore, it’s entirely different to kill a human, which has an understanding of death, than it is to kill a non-human animal. Killing a human requires consent, and it would be disrespectful to whatever burial traditions their culture has to shoot them, so it’s an entirely different subject. Killing pets is also an entirely different subject, people develop deep bonds with their pets, and have radically different feelings about the death of their pets vs the death of other animals. I’m fine with shooting a cow, I have no attachment and it’s perfectly humane. I’m not fine with shooting my dog, because I’ve developed a bond with it.

Im not interested in debating this further, I won’t be convinced to your side and I doubt you’ll be convinced to mine, so don’t bother replying.

I just think that 'animals are living intelligent creatures that have feelings and deserve to be respected' and 'when done properly farming is beneficial to both people and animals and there's nothing wrong with raising and killing animals for food, clothing, and other products' are concepts that very much can and should coexist

[expertacademicassignmenthelp]

How to Write Nursing Research Papers The process of nursing research paper writing involves exploring relevant issues within the field and proposing viable solutions. The complexity of nursing necessitates in-depth research, analytical thinking, and critical analysis. Topics may span various areas such as psychiatric nursing, healthcare management, evidence-based medicine, clinic hygiene, home-based healthcare, healthcare practices, and ethics, all of which revolve around the central goal of alleviating patient suffering and addressing their psychological well-being. Before delving into the writing process, it is crucial to determine the type of research paper – analytical or argumentative. Analytical research papers involve a specific analysis of issues or literary texts, employing designs like question/answer, comparison/contrast, problem/solution, cause/effect, hypothesis/proof, or change over time. On the other hand, argumentative research papers focus on presenting diverse viewpoints on a debatable issue, requiring an investigation of different studies to provide compelling arguments while addressing opposing views objectively. Selecting an appropriate topic is a critical aspect of the research paper process. The chosen topic should be specific, relevant to nursing, interesting to the writer, and within the prescribed length and format guidelines. Topics like Nursing Science During the 20th Century, Nurses’ Safety on the Working Place, or The Importance of Neonatal Care Nursing exemplify suitable choices. Once a topic is chosen, the next step involves sourcing information from reliable primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. Primary sources include original materials like academic journals, interviews, surveys, and court records. Secondary sources analyze or describe primary sources, encompassing books, articles, encyclopedias, dictionaries, and textbooks. Tertiary sources aid in organizing or locating both primary and secondary sources and typically involve databases and indexes. Pre-writing activities, such as brainstorming, freewriting, mindmapping, and outlining, play a pivotal role in organizing ideas before the actual writing process. These activities help in collecting and structuring major points and arguments effectively. In terms of formatting styles, the APA style is commonly used in nursing research papers. It dictates a specific structure with a title page, abstract, main body, and reference page. In-text citations follow a specific format with the author's last name and year of publication. The entire paper is typed in twelve-point Times New Roman font. The basic structure of a nursing research paper includes a title page containing the title, running head, author’s name, and institutional affiliation. The abstract, written on a separate page, provides a summary of key points, not less than 250 words, along with keywords. The main body comprises an introduction, body paragraphs addressing each point from the abstract with citations, and a conclusion restating the thesis and supporting arguments. The reference page, placed after the main body, lists all sources alphabetically with one-half inch indentation. Adhering to these guidelines ensures the creation of a well-structured and comprehensive nursing research paper. For further assistance contact us at williamsliason@outloock.com

[emergingmediaculture]

Graphic created by Kiersten W. on Canva.

The speed at which our media landscape is changing is a topic that is always up for discussion, and rightfully so. In a landscape that is rapidly evolving, the topic cannot be brought up enough because there is always something new to adapt to. The Influencing Machine by Brooke Gladstone discusses the subject of our emerging media and its effect on a field that has no doubt seen revolutionary changes, journalism. Gladstone’s use of comic strips and illustrations to walk the reader through her book invites a bit of humor that she, herself, adds despite the discussion of some serious topics. In discussing the history of journalism and the technological advancements that have furthered its limits, I find it especially important to also talk about journalism's “controversial”, and I say that lightly, past with those who have hoped to suppress it. From the moment the American press, and even before that, was no longer under the rule of the British monarchy and able to freely distribute news of their choosing, there has existed hostility between those behind the news and those in power, even more so with the creation of investigative or “muckraking” journalism which set out to expose the corruption of those in positions of power. Something that I often think about when on this topic, something that I consider my Roman Empire, is Thomas Jefferson who vehemently pushed for the freedom of the press, believing it was a right that all American citizens deserved. Then I think of his time as president where he always seemed to be at odds with the press, insisting that nothing in newspapers can be believed anymore. Debates of ethics, truth-telling, and libel arose from such issues. Libel, as Gladstone puts it, is the issue that exists as the main point of tension between the government and the press. Meanwhile, libel, itself, is already pretty muddy water.

Historically during times of war, there have been instances of government attempts to suppress journalist in favor of releasing their own, approved forms of journalism that included various forms of war propaganda. This has been done by invoking the issue of “national security”. This form of abuse of power is a point of importance inGladstone's book. With the rise of television, though, a new visual was introduced to the public which allowed for a greater impact on the journalism front. I think of the Vietnam War, which is sometimes referred to as the “first television war”. For the first time, the public was able to see video from the front lines right from the comfort of their homes. No doubt this hit harder than simply reading about or even seeing pictures of the war.

With the controversy surrounding the Vietnam War, especially at the time, it is safe to say these new visuals allowed the public to see a different side of war, one they were not used to seeing. It further makes sense why this time was a great point of division in America.

Moreover, the point in the book that stuck out to me the most, the point that was filled with a lot of “exactly” and “yep” from me was Gladstone’s discussion on objectivity. The notion of objectivity in journalism is something that if you ask the average person, they would say is needed. But does true objectivity even exist? Despite how it is painted, objectivity is not a black-and-white concept.

“Even the most objective news is made up of subjective decisions”.

I read this quote a few years back in an article written by a reporter discussing objectivity in news. It changed my entire outlook on the concept of objectivity, so let’s break it down.

Let’s say there is a protest happening in your city. The assignment editor to a news station has to make a decision on who to send to cover it. They can decide to send someone who has covered an event like this before and has experience or someone who has not as a chance to give them that experience. That’s one decision that’s going to produce different stories. The reporter chosen goes to the protest and has to decide where to get video from. They decide to shoot from various areas to be able to show as much as they can. That’s decision two, the areas they shoot from. Now who do they interview? Most likely someone who holds some position of power in this protest, as well as those participating in it from both sides. There is only so much time in a news story, so the reporter picks maybe two or three people. Every person is different. What one person says will not be what someone else says. That’s decision three.

I can go on and on with this such as talking about the decision of how much time the reporter is given to cover this story, how many updates to the story will be provided, etc., etc., etc.

Does that still make it fully objective? Maybe as objective as humanly possible for the person covering it, but that also goes back to objectivity not being black and white. Everyone has biases, and a lot of those biases are unknown to the person who have them. How can you work against your biases if you are unaware of them? That’s part of being human. Gladstone discusses how the public sees the media as an entity working against us, when really, I believe that simply underestimates what humans are capable of.

Not to mention what one person sees as objective, another person may not. As Gladstone points out, people only want objectivity when it aligns with their values, otherwise, it's seen as “taking sides”.

[pramukh-jewels-blog]

Introduction: Diamonds have long been cherished for their exquisite beauty, captivating sparkle, and timeless appeal. However, recent advancements in technology have introduced an alternative to the traditional notion of natural diamonds. Lab-grown diamonds, created in controlled environments under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions, have gained considerable popularity in the jewellery industry. This has sparked a debate among enthusiasts and buyers as to which type of diamond is superior. In this blog, we will explore the key differences and considerations between lab-grown and natural diamonds, shedding light on this intriguing topic. Origins: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are formed deep within the Earth's mantle over millions of years. Carbon atoms are subjected to intense heat and pressure, causing crystal formations. These crystals are brought to the Earth's surface through volcanic eruptions, where they are mined and eventually transformed into dazzling gems. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds, also known as synthetic or cultured diamonds, are created through technological processes that mimic the natural formation of diamonds. High-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods are used to simulate the environmental conditions necessary for diamond growth. Composition and Structure: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are composed of carbon atoms arranged in a crystalline lattice structure. Their unique formation process gives them a distinct set of internal characteristics known as inclusions, which can affect their clarity and value. These inclusions are often seen as "birthmarks" that authenticate a diamond's natural origin. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds possess the same chemical composition as natural diamonds, consisting entirely of carbon atoms. However, due to the controlled growth process, they typically exhibit fewer or no inclusions, resulting in higher clarity grades compared to their natural counterparts. Quality and Aesthetics: Natural Diamonds: The allure of natural diamonds lies in their rarity and natural imperfections, which make each stone unique. The traditional perception of diamonds as symbols of status and luxury is deeply ingrained in their scarcity and the long-established mining industry. The subtle variations in colour, clarity, and cut found in natural diamonds create an enchanting appeal. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer an ethically sourced alternative without compromising on the visual appeal. They are available in a range of colours, clarities, and cuts, allowing consumers to select their preferred stone with precision. Moreover, lab-grown diamonds tend to exhibit excellent clarity and are often more affordable than natural diamonds of comparable quality. Environmental Impact: Natural Diamonds: The mining and extraction of natural diamonds can have a significant environmental impact. Deforestation, soil erosion, water pollution, and carbon emissions are associated with diamond mining activities. Additionally, the social and humanitarian concerns surrounding conflict or "blood" diamonds have also raised ethical questions. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds have a significantly lower environmental impact. The controlled production process reduces the need for mining, which alleviates the associated ecological disturbances. Moreover, the use of renewable energy sources in the manufacturing of lab-grown diamonds further enhances their environmental sustainability. Ethical Considerations: Natural Diamonds: The issue of ethical sourcing has plagued the diamond industry for decades. While efforts have been made to implement ethical mining practices and establish systems like the Kimberley Process to track diamond origins, challenges remain. The potential presence of conflict diamonds, which fund civil wars and human rights abuses, is a cause for concern.

Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer a transparent supply chain, as their origins can be easily traced. The absence of human rights violations and the assurance of ethical production make them an appealing choice for conscious consumers seeking peace of mind.

[infinityiamonds]

Introduction: Diamonds have long been cherished for their exquisite beauty, captivating sparkle, and timeless appeal. However, recent advancements in technology have introduced an alternative to the traditional notion of natural diamonds. Lab-grown diamonds, created in controlled environments under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions, have gained considerable popularity in the jewellery industry. This has sparked a debate among enthusiasts and buyers as to which type of diamond is superior. In this blog, we will explore the key differences and considerations between lab-grown and natural diamonds, shedding light on this intriguing topic. Origins: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are formed deep within the Earth's mantle over millions of years. Carbon atoms are subjected to intense heat and pressure, causing crystal formations. These crystals are brought to the Earth's surface through volcanic eruptions, where they are mined and eventually transformed into dazzling gems. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds, also known as synthetic or cultured diamonds, are created through technological processes that mimic the natural formation of diamonds. High-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods are used to simulate the environmental conditions necessary for diamond growth. Composition and Structure: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are composed of carbon atoms arranged in a crystalline lattice structure. Their unique formation process gives them a distinct set of internal characteristics known as inclusions, which can affect their clarity and value. These inclusions are often seen as "birthmarks" that authenticate a diamond's natural origin. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds possess the same chemical composition as natural diamonds, consisting entirely of carbon atoms. However, due to the controlled growth process, they typically exhibit fewer or no inclusions, resulting in higher clarity grades compared to their natural counterparts. Quality and Aesthetics: Natural Diamonds: The allure of natural diamonds lies in their rarity and natural imperfections, which make each stone unique. The traditional perception of diamonds as symbols of status and luxury is deeply ingrained in their scarcity and the long-established mining industry. The subtle variations in colour, clarity, and cut found in natural diamonds create an enchanting appeal. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer an ethically sourced alternative without compromising on the visual appeal. They are available in a range of colours, clarities, and cuts, allowing consumers to select their preferred stone with precision. Moreover, lab-grown diamonds tend to exhibit excellent clarity and are often more affordable than natural diamonds of comparable quality. Environmental Impact: Natural Diamonds: The mining and extraction of natural diamonds can have a significant environmental impact. Deforestation, soil erosion, water pollution, and carbon emissions are associated with diamond mining activities. Additionally, the social and humanitarian concerns surrounding conflict or "blood" diamonds have also raised ethical questions. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds have a significantly lower environmental impact. The controlled production process reduces the need for mining, which alleviates the associated ecological disturbances. Moreover, the use of renewable energy sources in the manufacturing of lab-grown diamonds further enhances their environmental sustainability. Ethical Considerations: Natural Diamonds: The issue of ethical sourcing has plagued the diamond industry for decades. While efforts have been made to implement ethical mining practices and establish systems like the Kimberley Process to track diamond origins, challenges remain. The potential presence of conflict diamonds, which fund civil wars and human rights abuses, is a cause for concern.

Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer a transparent supply chain, as their origins can be easily traced. The absence of human rights violations and the assurance of ethical production make them an appealing choice for conscious consumers seeking peace of mind.

[infinitydiamonds]

Introduction: Diamonds have long been cherished for their exquisite beauty, captivating sparkle, and timeless appeal. However, recent advancements in technology have introduced an alternative to the traditional notion of natural diamonds. Lab-grown diamonds, created in controlled environments under high-pressure, high-temperature conditions, have gained considerable popularity in the jewellery industry. This has sparked a debate among enthusiasts and buyers as to which type of diamond is superior. In this blog, we will explore the key differences and considerations between lab-grown and natural diamonds, shedding light on this intriguing topic. Origins: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are formed deep within the Earth's mantle over millions of years. Carbon atoms are subjected to intense heat and pressure, causing crystal formations. These crystals are brought to the Earth's surface through volcanic eruptions, where they are mined and eventually transformed into dazzling gems. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds, also known as synthetic or cultured diamonds, are created through technological processes that mimic the natural formation of diamonds. High-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods are used to simulate the environmental conditions necessary for diamond growth. Composition and Structure: Natural Diamonds: Natural diamonds are composed of carbon atoms arranged in a crystalline lattice structure. Their unique formation process gives them a distinct set of internal characteristics known as inclusions, which can affect their clarity and value. These inclusions are often seen as "birthmarks" that authenticate a diamond's natural origin. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds possess the same chemical composition as natural diamonds, consisting entirely of carbon atoms. However, due to the controlled growth process, they typically exhibit fewer or no inclusions, resulting in higher clarity grades compared to their natural counterparts. Quality and Aesthetics: Natural Diamonds: The allure of natural diamonds lies in their rarity and natural imperfections, which make each stone unique. The traditional perception of diamonds as symbols of status and luxury is deeply ingrained in their scarcity and the long-established mining industry. The subtle variations in colour, clarity, and cut found in natural diamonds create an enchanting appeal. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer an ethically sourced alternative without compromising on the visual appeal. They are available in a range of colours, clarities, and cuts, allowing consumers to select their preferred stone with precision. Moreover, lab-grown diamonds tend to exhibit excellent clarity and are often more affordable than natural diamonds of comparable quality. Environmental Impact: Natural Diamonds: The mining and extraction of natural diamonds can have a significant environmental impact. Deforestation, soil erosion, water pollution, and carbon emissions are associated with diamond mining activities. Additionally, the social and humanitarian concerns surrounding conflict or "blood" diamonds have also raised ethical questions. Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds have a significantly lower environmental impact. The controlled production process reduces the need for mining, which alleviates the associated ecological disturbances. Moreover, the use of renewable energy sources in the manufacturing of lab-grown diamonds further enhances their environmental sustainability. Ethical Considerations: Natural Diamonds: The issue of ethical sourcing has plagued the diamond industry for decades. While efforts have been made to implement ethical mining practices and establish systems like the Kimberley Process to track diamond origins, challenges remain. The potential presence of conflict diamonds, which fund civil wars and human rights abuses, is a cause for concern.

Lab-Grown Diamonds: Lab-grown diamonds offer a transparent supply chain, as their origins can be easily traced. The absence of human rights violations and the assurance of ethical production make them an appealing choice for conscious consumers seeking peace of mind.