#“wouldnt like it bc they didnt consent” which again isnt some evil and twisted thing to say.
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
i went thru op's blog and tried figuring out their point. and..... idk im kind of lost. like apparently op meant shit like "no i dont mean raw dogging it in a crowd, i meant doing it in a secluded area" (i think)? and i said this in the notes, but..... why didnt you specify what you meant? like tell me, why are these two strangers having sex in public? was privacy a choice? are they exhibitionists? are they too far from home? did they think they were secluded enough? however (and this isnt me talking abt the puritanical freaks), i still stand by my point. like everyone is entitled to be a little grossed out by accidentally catching 2 people in a secluded area (or whatever op meant). some people simply dont want to see some random strangers naked or interrupting an intimate act. and its also fucking stupid bc op is like "ermmmm youre weaponizing consent" LIKE....... THINK ABOUT THIS SLOWLY........ if i dont like something..... i wont want to see it it....... therefore, i dont consent to seeing two people having public sex. i really dont think its that deep. i dont mean to repeat myself, but its like the "i dont like coconut" example. i just dont fucking like that sort of thing. and its so AUGH bc i try to be as open minded as i can, because i dont know everything. and i know other people have different experiences and viewpoints than me, so im open to learn from people who know better........... but i really cant tell if op knows better. like at all. and i really dont think we should be making some sort of political think piece about how its the same kind of mentality behind anti gay/trans laws just because people dont want to come across 2 strangers participating in a kink that they dont like.
every time i try to make sense of that discourse so i can feel like "wow! i learned something new and expanded my world view" i just feel like im still in the same spot as i was before i saw that poll
its not fash behavior to not like something and not wanna be involved in it. literally this was the type of mentality i had w that poll "hey hacknineirl, do u want coconut cake?" "no thank you, i dont like that" "hey hacknineirl, do u want to see two people boning?" "no thank you, i dont like that" like, i dont like coconut and i dont want to eat anything with coconut in it. its not bc coconut killed my grandma or whatever. its bc i cant stand the taste and texture of it. other people are allowed to eat it and i wont stop them if they do, but i dont want to eat it. the same goes for public sex. i dont care if other people enjoy it, but i dont want to see it. its a kink im not into. thats it, i promise its not deep at all. i wont deny the existence of puritanical weirdos that limit what other people do w their bodies. but its gross to act like everyone who wouldnt want to see a sex act that theyre not into is a fash. literally go learn what "your kink is not my kink and thats okay" means bc thats the mentality i have. like kink at pride is fine bc like. if im going to pride, id expect there to be people dressed in kink gear. i know what id be getting into, so id be fine with it. but i wouldnt be fine w people fucking in the vegetable section of walmart bc i just want my spinach and carrots. and then the response to the poll was so fucking entitled like. if i dont want to see a sex act, then i shouldnt have to be exposed to it. i dont like shit like inflation, so im not gonna go browse that tag on FA . i dont like genshin impact, so im not gonna go on youtube and watch people play it. same thing w public sex. "hurr not liking public sex means you think sex is a violent traumatic act" i had no idea that asking people to have basic decency regarding boundaries is the same type of mentality behind anti gay/trans laws. had nooooooo idea that simply not wanting to see something that i dont like is fash behavior. yeah my bad, i should be perfectly cheery and happy to see something that i dont like actually! in fact! im not allowed to simply dislike things! quick op, tell me what would you do if your partner didnt want to have public sex. bc if ur so up in arms about someone not wanting to see strangers having sex in public, then what would you do if your partner didnt want to have sex in public?
#by the end of the day#i think boundaries are important#like maybe just try doing a better job at hiding the fact ur having sex in public#or go to a place that allows u to have sex#like idk what to rlly say anymore and i feel like im fucking tweaking#bc none of this should be some sort of deep political think piece about how someones weaponizing consent and treating sex like a violent#crime.............. just because they dont like seeing two strangers having sex#like if this were solely about the puritanical fucks. then yeah id get it more. but idk it sounds like op is talking about everyone who#“wouldnt like it bc they didnt consent” which again isnt some evil and twisted thing to say.#i keep rereading op's post and im trying to Absorb their words. and it just doesnt make sense to me.#“BUT WHAT ABOUT HOMELESS PEOPLE???” like yeah no shit sherlock. they dont have access to a private space.#its different bc they dont have a choice with where they can do their business or whatever. theyre stuck w public spaces#and this loops back to my previous point bc maybe you shouldve specified the scenario#like “hey guys heres a survey. im gonna ask a vague and loaded question... and i wont elaborate until after i post the survey's results”#like..... okay?#ugh#clearly op hasnt taken a statistics class. or atleast forgot everything they were taught from that class
7 notes
·
View notes