silvixel

[silvixel]

not them acting like that on the red carpet, coupled with that song choice 😂 mtvuk i see what you did there and i’m not complaining

[silvixel]

binoculars

[silvixel]

when it's the 60s and u can't get married to your best friend bc you're both men so you just tangle up your names and assets and business and money and songs into one gigantic legal monster because SURELY you're lasting together forever and then you have to go through the world's first gay divorce in the 70s and it's 10x more complicated than an actual divorce bc it wasn't actually a marriage. and also there's 2 other guys there you fucked over in the process. well this did happen to my good friends sir paul mccartney and john lennon

[silvixel]

"It's ok I won't eat him. Are you crazy I might eat him."

[silvixel]

little fink drawing just for fun 🦊

[silvixel]

What the fuck is this shit?! Some fans of the black team are so despicable. I'm glad George gave Aegon and Viserys their place in history, one as Rhaenyra's heir and the other to continue the lineage to Daenerys.

[silvixel]

an emotion

also i have a tip jar now! if you'd like to support my work you can do it here! love you all and thank you <3

[silvixel]

Anakin Skywalker 💔

Print made for Fan Expo Chicago 2024. Signed by Hayden Christensen at the event.

[silvixel]

Well, if I ever want to cry, I just need to look at these two drawings 😭💔

(The first is by Abigail Larson; anyone know who the artist is for the second drawing???)

[silvixel]

Can you explain how "Two of us" is a mclennon song? I know it's about John but can you please give me a full explanation of the song and what it means. Thank you.

Paul explained that this song was about his fondness for getting deliberately lost in the country with his future wife Linda. I partially agree with him, because I think that he wrote this song for Linda just in the first couple of verses, and as he always used to do, he then projected his feelings for John into other people, in this case Linda. I’ll explain you how.

George Harrison is an example. When Paul talks about John and how much he cares and loves him, he always mentions George, even if he literally has nothing to do with the question asked. When he admits how jealous he was for Stuart, he doesn’t talk for himself, he says that George was jealous, and then add something like “we all were” to include himself in the group, when in the end he’s just talking about himself.  That’s because it’s his way to express his feelings for him: projecting them onto another person.

For his songs he does the same, or sometimes he can be more creative, like write a whole song about an invented character that never really existed, and it’s a simple projection of his feelings towards John. Example: the song “Yvonne’s the one.” Yvonne is John. “Hey jude”: Jude is not Julian, it’s John. In “Oh!darling”., at one point in the song, you can clearly hear him singing “Oh!Johnny”. He justified that saying he was simply singing with an “Irish accent”. What a liar.

He does the same in Two Of us. The song is for Linda, but just the first couple of lines, when he mention their habit to ride in the countryside for the weekend:

Two of us Sunday driving

not arriving

on our way back home

if you read the next lyrics there are some stories and experiences that have nothing to do with her:

You and I have memorieslonger than the road that stretches out ahead

In 1969 he had just met Linda, they knew each other during the Sgt Pepper era in 1967 but got to really know each other in 1968, 1 year before this song. Memories longer than the road that streches out ahead sounds weird for someone you’ve met one year ago. That’s because he’s talking about John, not Linda. Just like their habit to write postcards and letters quite frequently during the 60s, both to parents and friends, but also to each other:

Two of us sending postcardsWriting lettersOn my wall

While the first part is more nostalgic, reminding all the good moments they shared and that now Paul misses, the second and last part is more critical. He mentions all the business issue that leaded their life in the last period 1968/69, when they spent very little time playing and more time debating about money and lawyers and who was right and who was wrong:

You and me chasing paperGetting nowhere

There are a couple of tapes (listen here and here) in which they both admit how this song, as oh!darling and don’t let me down, make them look like they are lovers, a couple who was splitting after years and years of that special bond who brought them to be the greatest music partnership ever.

They sang and recorded this song together, with just one microphone, like the beautful old days, probably the very last moment they shared such an intimate moment before the split. This is the video, the audio is not the original though, cause in the original there’s Paul who mimics Elvis and John follows him, but Youtube removed it and this is the only one available:

[silvixel]

I am also so thrilled for Indian Louies!!!! I truly believe Louis wants to catch all his fans...and in the background he works hard to make it all happen. We just don't see the struggles.

/// Lol, I don't think Louis has strong Indian audience, at this point it is basically catering to Indian demographics. Out of the 5- Zayn is the most popular. I know you won't share this ask, but I don't know how many will sing along in Mumbai/Bombay. Indian Louies are very less in numbers.

did this ask make you feel better, anon.

[silvixel]

"The Believer."

AKA Din is a nervous desperate father who will literally do anything to get his kid back.

It's a question of honoring what he believes to be the Way regarding wearing armor, or honoring what he believes to be the Way regarding foundlings - and Din chooses his kid. He will always choose his kid.

The episode nears its conclusion with Cara asking Din, "What's our next move?" And apparently their next move involves threatening Gideon (way to go, Din!!!), since the very next (closing) scene is Din throwing Gideon's opening speech right back at him - with several notable changes.

Gideon had said:

You have something I want. You may think you have some idea of what you are in possession of, but you do not. In a few moments, it will be mine. It means more to me than you will ever know.

But Din says:

You have something I want. You may think you have some idea of what you are in possession of, but you do not. Soon, he will be back with me. He means more to me than you will ever know.

Grogu is not an "it" to Din, nor is he an object or thing to own. He is a child, a child Din will sacrifice everything to protect, and Din is coming to save him ❤️

[silvixel]

Liam Gallagher and Paul Arthurs commenting on a photo of Louis Tomlinson and Steve Durham at SUPERBLOOM FESTIVAL [9.9.2024] via Twitter

[silvixel]

Ah shit.

[silvixel]

To me, the worst tragedy of Star Wars is that the Jedi would have won if they weren't betrayed. They discovered who was the Sith. Mace defeated him! The Jedi would have won the war that was set up to destroy them and they lost, not because of some incompetence or weakness or whatever, but because they were betrayed by one of their own.

[silvixel]

realest thing ever said, it's as if those boys had never been Rhaenyra's or even Daemon's (to some fans)

[silvixel]

i do always find it very funny when people point to anakin as evidence that the jedi attachment rule is wrong. like bro, anakin proves them RIGHT. everything anakin did is exactly why the jedi warned against attachments