romanreadsbooks

[romanreadsbooks]

Go Luck Yourself by Sara Raasch - Review

TL;DR

3.4 Stars

Pros: Characters are so loveable, cathartic resolution to side plot

Cons: Main non-romance plot is lackluster, telling and not showing, expected spice vs actual

Continue the Series? Yes

Spoilers in review? Yes

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

I adored Sara Raasch's previous book in the series, Nightmare Before Kissmas, so of course I picked up the second one as soon as it was available.

I am desperate for an Iris romance, so I was a tiny bit sad that this romance centered Kris, but I liked him as a character so I still wanted to pick this one up.

(Also, to note, an account that I assume is actually Sara Raasch liked my review for the previous book in the series, Nightmare Before Kissmas. This is fine, she's free to read and engage with whatever she wants, it was just a bit odd for me lol)

Likes:

I do like both of our MMCs, but this book made me LOVE Kris.

His internal battle with himself over what he can be outside of a servant or subduing force for his brother is both wonderful and heartbreaking. The idea that 'your worth is only what you provide to others' is one that I and I think many other people struggle with. It was lovely to see him go through that journey and still struggle with it, but have the tools and the support system to heal and find his own *happy* ever after.

And speaking of support system, Coal and Iris were just so lovely yet again. I adore this little trio and the little family they've formed, especially when things got tough for Kris, both with his mom and with Loch.

And speaking of his mom, man I'm so glad he finally dealt with her. I thankfully don't have any personal experience dealing with a narcissistic family member so I can't speak to the accuracy of the representation of it, but man was it cathartic to finally be rid of her.

Dislikes:

It's not exactly accurate say I disliked the politics of this book, they just weren't as interesting as the first book. Most of my complaint of this nature was surrounding Malachy, Loch's Uncle and Regent King of St Patrick's Day.

This guy who's supposed to be our antagonist just isn't around? Malachy showing up at the end to be evil for a bit and throw a wrench into Loch and Kris's relationship was just kind of... Lackluster?

It felt like the confrontation between Loch and Malachy was supposed to be this big, climatic thing, similar to Coal's conflict with his father, but it just didn't hit the same. Maybe because it wasn't from Loch's perspective so we don't get to hear the history as much?

All of the St. Patrick family kept saying how bad a guy Malachy was, but he just wasn't around enough to make me not like him. So when he had his great fall, I didn't feel triumphant either. He wasn't even in the scene where Loch took ownership of St. Patricks day, only came to yell at Loch after. And he was also stripped of his power/access to joy off page?? Like what.

I think that it could have been more interesting if Malachy were around a bit more to confuse Kris externally rather than it being left to Kris to confuse himself via overthinking. And to, y'know, *be* an antagonist.

And then, similar to the first book, it was odd to be teased with the whole "good boy" dialogue and have Loch being hinted at taking on a more "dom" role and then not actually including that in their spicy scenes. It kind of reminds me how Deep End by Ali Hazelwood used a ton of "more advanced" BDSM language but then proceeded to be the most basic form of a Dom/Sub relationship.

Hinting at more, but actually providing less. I'm sure it's enough for those who dont often read more kinky romances, but it just felt like an unfulfilled promise to me.

Other Notes:

I think for most people it's probably fine (this is just a me thing) but I was struggling to read Loch's dialogue. It's just an Irish accent, but that's not an accent I hear very often, so I don't really know what it's supposed to sound like. I got the hang of it by the end, but man was it a struggle at the start. (Tbf I struggle to read my OWN accent when it's written out in dialogue)

In a similar, but more humorous vein: just like I don't know Irish pronunciation of words, I also don't know Irish pronunciation of names.

It took me until the last like 30 pages of the book to realize that Malachy's name is pronounced the same as Malachi. In my head I was pronouncing it like "Mah - Lock - key" because it was spelled similar to the word Malarkey... My bad lmao

Rating Breakdown

Characters: 8

Atmosphere: 6

Writing: 7

Plot: 6

Intrigue:6

Logic: 7

Enjoyment: 7

Dialogue: 7

Total: 6.75/10 or 3.4 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Lights Out by Nevessa Allen - Review

TL;DR

2.7 Stars

Pros: Phenomenal duet narration, surprisingly likable characters

Cons: Disjointed first and second half, a lot of time spent justifying

Continue the Series? No

Spoilers in review? No

Content Warnings for review: stalker romance, knife kink, mentions of rape

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

It was two things: 1) I had just finished my last audiobook and thus that slot was available for a new book, and 2) the audios I heard on tiktok were hilarious

I'm indifferent to most dark romance and I'm not particularly interested in stalker or knife kinks so I wasn't looking to be "roused", but I was curious. Much like when I read Priest by Sierra Simone, I was curious as to what it was about this kink/fetish/whatever that made people tick other than just the taboo of it. And just like with with the priest kink I kind of still don't get it?

But hey, whatever your into is fine by me. My personal mentality is essentially just RACK (Risk Aware Consensual Kink) so as long as every real person is consenting, I'm all good.

Likes:

First and foremost, the main reason I finished this book was the narrators, and . They book itself didn't contain anything that would have made me DNF, exactly. Its just that I might have considered DNFing from just not being engaged with the story, which is to be expected if the main point of it is a kink in not into. But with the surprisingly humourous and light-hearted delivery by the narrators, I didn't even consider stopping.

And as Characters both Josh (MMC) and Aly (FMC) we're surprisingly likable, considering how they were first introduced.

With Aly, she's a nurse who (apparently) works out a ton and likes a hookup every now and again to let off steam -- to me this just screams 'high school mean girl all grown up'. Fortunately she has a bit more depth than that, though her constant, absurd overconfidence in her own abilities was slightly irritating.

Like girl, you *really* thought you, with no experience in the tech world, would be able to sneak a tracking device onto a guy who you *know* is a highly skilled hacker and is actively stalking you? Please stop deluding yourself before you get killed. (There are countless other instances, but I don't need to make this review longer than necessary)

Aly took the phrase "If your gonna be dumb, you gotta be tough" to heart, but falsely equated being tough and being brave. Because somehow despite her allegedly rigorous work out routine, she is over powered at every turn. Especially by Big Strong™ Josh

Josh is the son an infamous serial killer and has, as a direct result, has a lot of trauma surrounding that. This trauma manifests in 2 main ways, 1) constant fear that he will follow down the same path as his father, and 2) A desperate need to be awareness of all potential threats that may be around him or the ones he loves at any given moment.

The need for awareness in combination with his 'elite hacking skills' makes the stalker that he is, except the only people who he seems to have stalked is his childhood best friend/roommate and now Aly, whom he met because she was banging his bestie/roomie

I mention all this because on paper they both sound more-or-less insufferable (and maybe they would have been had they not had the narrators voices), but I actually did like them both. I thought they were flawed, but still likable.

Dislikes:

This felt like 2 separate, sequential stories slammed together so that it could be an appropriate length for a novel.

It's like the author wrote the first half, the story of how the stalker became the lover, finished it, and then realized that it was 100-150 pages short of being a book. After which she attached a second, equally short story to the back and didn't *really* bother trying to interweave them together.

That's not to say both plots weren't good, or at least entertaining, but they did feel incredibly disjointed. They were particularly good or interesting either, but they weren't horrible.

And additionally this page count (338 pages) is also heavily padded with the sheer amount of justification both characters ramble through in their respective inner monologues. I have a more to say on this in the Other Notes section, since it's not exactly a negative, but I do think that Allen could have written these rationalizing soliloquies in a way that didn't feel like the characters were beating their readers over the head with a hammer with how blunt and direct it was.

Other Notes:

That said, about the opaqueness of the messaging, is very understandable in this day in age. Others can express concern over the rise of anti-intellectualism, censorship, puritanical ideation, etc far more elegantly that I could ever hope to do with my STEM education that has failed to provide me the ability to articulate exactly how I'm feeling.

But I will do my best.

After sections where both Aly and Josh experience attraction or titillation or whatever you want to call it, there is very often a follow up section where they spend multiple minutes of audiobook time explaining to the reader exactly why it is okay that they had the reaction that they did.

Why they might be into certain taboo things and how the way they engage with those things is alright. Most of it revolves, essentially, around the fact that all parties involved are giving informed consent. As I mentioned in the "Going into the Book" section, this is a belief that I hold, as well. So, to me, I have these long sections of telling me what I already know and I'm getting a little bored.

But at the same time I know exactly why they are included -- because the idea that "consenting adults should be allowed to do what they want in the walls of their own homes" is becoming frustratingly more and more foreign.

So this very explicit, on-page explanation is a reasonable inclusion, even if it slows the pacing. And it being there, I think, makes it a pretty decent starting place for those looking to dip their toes into the dark romance/stalker romance world. Might be a boring read for those more familiar with it though.

Rating Breakdown

Characters: 5

Atmosphere: 6

Writing: 5

Plot: 4

Intrigue:6

Logic: 5

Enjoyment: 6

Dialogue: 7

Total: 5.5/10 or 2.7 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Sunrise on the Reaping by Suzanne Collins - Review

TL;DR

5.0 Stars

Pros: Characters, motivation, messaging/themes

Cons: a little too fast paced, MORE PAIN PLEASE

Continue the Series? Yes (if there will ever be another)

Spoilers in review? Only stuff we already know from the original Hunger Games trilogy

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

Do I even need to explain? It's a book in the Hunger Games, and it's about HAYMITCH.

I was one of those people who was like "Oh she won't write a book about Haymitch cause we already know what happens". What a FOOL I was.

So I bought it, binged it in less than 48 hours and haven't stopped thinking about it since.

Likes:

As always, the characters in this novel were just immaculate. They were interesting, complex, compelling, and altogether *real*.

Of course it was great to meet characters old and new, but Collins ability to write realistic characters astounds me every time.

I especially appreciate how she write motivation for her characters. There is always the classic "hope for a better future" that drives characters to keep going in stories across all mediums. That's great and all but "hope" it's simply not enough for most people, I think. Especially in a situation as dire as the Hunger Games, regardless of whether you are a tribute or a standard district citizen .

Each of the characters motivations, be it spite, revenge, a promise, and even those who were truly there for the hope of a better future, ALL we believable for their respective situations.

And I could continue to wax poetic about this book for hours but the final think I want to touch on is the books themes around propaganda. How it effect every day life and the opinions of those around you, both your friends and your foes. Obviously the entire Hunger Games series strike a cord with its readers because of the he poignancy with the modern socioeconomic climate, but this one hit the hardest for me.

It might just be because this is the most aware I've been of the injustices and tragedies going on the world, or the daily comments about how we're living in "unprecedented times", or maybe just because I'm an adult with a job and a 401k now. Regardless, I hope this book has a similar impact to others and can, in its own way, be a drive for change.

Dislikes:

I think the book could have been just a tad bit longer if it meant that we got to explore the characters just a little more. I've seen some people say that they felt the books pace was a little fast and while I don't personally think that's the case, I understand why.

It felt that they cut this book down to just what was needed to tell a magnificent story which is great, if this wasn't the 5th book in the universe. At this point people are invested and can stand for it to be just a smidge slower/longer to spend more time with the characters.

And for me personally, I would end that last bit of the novel, where Haymitch is grieving over what has been done to his family and girlfriend. I think it would have helped convey how hollow and pained Haymitch felt if we could have sat with that grief a little bit longer.

I know I'm asking for more hurt in an already incredibly sad story but I want to HURT.

Other Notes:

I DESPERATELY want a book about a tribute from District Three, possibly as an allegory/related to the rise of AI and other technologies without regulation. As someone who works in the fintech world without having a a fintech job, it is simply egregious some of the ways people in this industry talk and have no care for those outside of it and the people who get hurt the most by it.

Rating Breakdown

Literally my only complaint with this book is that I wanted more of it, which is not really a complaint at all, so tens across the board.

Characters: 10

Atmosphere: 10

Writing: 10

Plot: 10

Intrigue: 10

Logic: 10

Enjoyment: 10

Dialogue:10

Total: 10/10 or 5.0 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Anyone know why the order of the kids got swapped for the reaping between the 50th and 74th Hunger Games? (Red is THG, blue is SotR)

[romanreadsbooks]

Deep End by Ali Hazelwood - Review

TL;DR

3.1 Stars

Pros: FMC, my kind of humor, better BDSM depiction

Cons: Too long, boring sex scenes, MMC personality(??)

Spoilers in review? One minor one (I mention the names of characters who have a cameo), otherwise spoiler-free

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

I have read most of Ali Hazelwood's bibliography (with the exception of Love on the Brain and the STEMinist Novellas) and I thoroughly enjoyed myself. Well. Except for one.

I absolutely *hated* Not in Love. I thought the MMC was awful, it depicted things like safe words as unnecessary, and I thought the way the FMCs struggle to form meaningful romantic relationships was written in a way that was vaguely arophobic. The only big plus it had was that is was short.

That said, Deep End was described to me as much more in line with Not in Love rather than her other works. So you know. Did not bode well for me. Add in the fact that I saw TON of people saying they were DNFing Deep End and I had rather low expectations going in.

Likes:

I liked the FMC, Scarlett (also goes by Vandy) overall. I think her rather absurd levels of imposter syndrome might annoy other readers, but I found her relatable. She was capable and witty and generally reasonably anxious about her abilities in a way that I related to from my own STEM-related insecurities.

The dialogue and prose was typical Hazelwood, which is a positive for me, but again, definitely could be annoying to others. It's fun, simply, and a little millennial-style cringe but I eat it up. They're were absolutely lines that made me laugh.

I think this book handled BDSM dynamics much better than Not in Love (the bar was very low, but we love improvement). I think the discussion around safe words was still a little iffy, but at least it wasn't completely dismissive. I don't imagine Hazelwood's main readership is super familiar with kink, so I'll take the positive representation.

[As an aside: BSDM and the larger kink community is something that I was involved with for a couple of years when I was figuring myself out. From that I became extremely passionate about safety and communication in kink. Aka I have a very high bar that Hazelwood will likely never reach, but her books are probably perfectly acceptable to those not involved in kink.]

Dislikes:

Way too long. Way, WAY too long. I guess Hazelwood was trying to take us through all the big competitions that a typical D1 diver would go to in a season, but something needed to be cut. Like why is this book 460 pages?? If you don't want to cut plot, cut the Olive and Adam cameo, or cut one or more of the sex scenes. And speaking of those...

A lot of the DNF reviews I saw said their big complaint was that there was so much sex and it all happened too fast and I..? They don't even kiss until like 150 pages in. They mention kink very early on so maybe that's what people were talking about? I have no idea if not.

And as for the amount of sex: I didn't mind it. It certainly was more than the 1-3 scenes we typically get from Hazelwood, but, again, the complaints of "too much sex" seemed unwarranted. All that's said, the sex scenes were kinda boring.

I don't go to Hazelwood when I'm looking for super well written smut, but I normally at least think it's fun. This time it was just kind of 'meh' and was the same thing over and over. Scarlett is like "oh no I don't know if I can take more" and Lukas(MMC) replies "You'll take what I give you" and then she does and that's it.

And speaking of Lukas... I don't know if he was originally two different characters that were merged into one, but it *feels* like he was. I would have a pretty solid understanding of what I thought he was like, but then he would say or do something that was felt so wildly out of character that I would pause and double check that he was the one speaking/doing whatever it was.

It happened enough times that he started feeling like he had two different personalities. I don't know if it was meant as 'I'm more myself when I'm with you' thing, but it didn't really work out that way. I did like both halves of Lukas, it was just odd.

Other Notes:

This book has a lot of miscommunication. It doesn't bother me that much, it's just a little boring as a plot device. It wasn't egregious enough to be annoying, so I left it out of the dislikes and put it here.

As for the plot outside of the romance? Well... It was there, I guess. I'm not gonna knock the rating too much for it, though, cause this is a romance book after all. The romance is the main plot. That said, I don't know if I love the climax? It was a little out of left field but it does make sense if you think about it.

Rating Breakdown

Overall the book was just kind of boring. I think if the book was cut to 300-350 pages it would have helped with the pacing.

Characters: 7

Atmosphere: 6

Writing: 6

Plot: 6

Intrigue:5

Logic: 6

Enjoyment: 6

Dialogue:8

Total: 6.25/10 or 3.1 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

I started listening to the audiobook of Lights Out and I'm sorry how am I supposed to take this dark romance seriously when the male narrator's deliveries were SO funny and well timed

[romanreadsbooks]

The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo by Taylor Jenkins Reid - Review

TL;DR

4.1 Stars

Pros: Characters (Especially Evelyn Hugo), LGBTQ+ representation

Cons: POV Character (Monique), lackluster twist and ending

Spoilers in review? No

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

The main reason for picking this book up now was that it was February's bookclub pick, but it's also been on my TBR for ages.

I've read Carrie Soto is Back and Daisy Jones and The Six by Reid prior to reading this and they we rated 4 and 5 stars, respectively, so I had high hopes for this one. That said, I didn't actually start the book until the day before bookclub and thus binged the whole thing in one day.

I heard the audiobook for this book was good, so that's how I consumed most of the book, but I did tandem read with the physical copy for a few chunks here and there.

Likes:

Just the characters man (with one notable exception that I will get into in the dislikes section). It's not surprising given that this book was was written by TJR. I adore just about every character she's written -- they all feel complicated and real. Both sympathetic and absolute assholes at the same time.

As for our title character: Evelyn Hugo fits the above perfectly. She is not a "good" person and does not pretend to be, but there are still admirable qualities in her. The members of my bookclub were on the fence as to whether she was a likable character, but in my personal opinion, that kind of doesn't matter. While it can help my enjoyment, it doesn't really matter if I like a character as a person. The biggest thing for me is if a character is interesting and I think Evelyn Hugo, like Daisy Jones, is absolutely fascinating.

There are a few LGBTQ+ characters we meet along the way and I do like they're portrayal. Reid does not downplay how dangerous it was to be openly a part of that community and how even the rich and famous would not be immune to the consequences of being found out. I enjoyed the mix of characters who were more optimistic about society's reception/thoughts toward the LGBTQ+ community and those who were more realistic and guarded/protective.

I also appreciated that Reid portrayed some of the bigotry bisexual individuals, in particular, face from both cishet people but also from within the LGBTQ+ community. The way they are often deemed "actually just straight" or "gay and in denial" and thus rejected from both communities. It's a very real issue that bafflingly still exists, despite this book being set 4+ decades in the past.

Dislikes:

The POV character, the one interviewing Evelyn, is named Monique is unfortunately both unlikeable *and* uninteresting. Or rather, her actions and reactions just feel inconsistent and irrational. Not to mention, in the first few chapters she makes a comment that she's lost a noticable amount of weight as a result of depression around her separation from her husband. She then frames it as a good thing because 'at least shes skinny and hot now' (not a direct quote, paraphrasing). And this is during the modern day portion of the novel, not the 60s/70s/80s. Call me crazy, but I don't think losing a substantial amount of weight due to depression is not a good thing.

And I'm sorry the last like 10% of the book is just horribly uninteresting.

When your book has a larger than life character such as Evelyn Hugo (who the book is named after and takes up 90% of the plot), it feels weird to have the "twist" of the book be about Monique. And her subsequent reaction to the reveal of the twist feels very blown out of proportion. Like on a logical level, I totally get why she is upset, but to have such an intense reaction? It just feels weird.

Again, I think this is because Monique is very much not the focus of the book and thus we did not spend enough time with her to understand how big of a deal this was.

I've seen very mixed reviews for this book online and after reading that ending, I totally get why. I still really enjoyed my time with this book but I know it is common for a lackluster ending to ruin a book for some people.

Rating Breakdown

Characters: 9

Atmosphere: 8

Writing: 8

Plot: 8

Intrigue:9

Logic: 8

Enjoyment: 8

Dialogue:7

Total: 8.1/10 or 4.1 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

My Vampire Plus-One by Jenna Lavine - Review

TL;DR

4.4 Stars

Pros: First time I've liked the miscommunication trope, comedic, fluffy and cute

Cons: Missed marketing opportunity, lacking diversity

Continue the Series? Yes, the next book is slated to be published in October 2025

Spoilers in review? Minor spoilers for things that happen in the first couple of chapters

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

Back in 2023 Jenna Lavine released her debut novel, My Roommate is A Vampire, and despite never having any interest in supernatural romances, I picked it up. It became one of my most *favorite* rom-coms of all time.

It was exactly my kind of silly and was one of the only books to ever make me literally laugh out loud. There was a reveal about Frederick's powers at the very end that had me cackling alone in my apartment for 10 minutes straight.

From that single novel she became an insta-buy author, and so when I saw My Vampire Plus One on the shelf I snatched it up and started reading it that day

Likes:

This book may have been the first ever implementation of the miscommunication trope that I actually adored. It boils down to Reggie(MMC) told Amelia(FMC) that he was a vampire very early on in their fake-relationship and with Amelia being a very linear-minded person, she thought he was 100% joking.

Silly misunderstandings and confused conversations ensure and it was wonderful. This whole book was just a bit of lighthearted, adorable, comedic fluff that I absolutely binged in two sittings.

Dislikes:

It probably isn't the best idea, but I do make a habit of texting/calling/emailing any valid numbers or addresses that appear in books. This book starts with a advertisement from a GeoCities website looking for information on our MMC. I emailed the address listed and...

Unfortunately it was not a real address, which was such a shame! It could have been a fun marketing thing for the author/publisher to claim the address and set up an automated response. (And yes I did try both Amelia's and Reggie's emails as well, but they were not real either.)

My biggest knock against this book is that I think it could use a little more diversity, especially among the main cast. It's set in a diverse metropolitan city (Chicago) so there is definitely room for a wider variety of people, but every book in the trilogy features only white couples.

Other Notes:

I was largely indifferent to the sex scenes in this book. As I'm writing this review, several days after finishing the book, I can't even remember anything about them. At least that means while they're not mind-meltingly good, they're also not horrible.

Rating Breakdown

Characters: 8

Atmosphere: 8

Writing: 8

Plot: 8

Intrigue:9

Logic: 9

Enjoyment: 10

Dialogue: 10

Total: 8.8/10 or 4.4 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Onyx Storm by Rebecca Yarros - Review

TL;DR

4.1 Stars

Pros: Characters (mostly Ridoc), Xaden's Character Arc, acknowledgement of the toxicity in relationships

Cons: Violet's reaction to Andarna, who lives and dies (feat. My probably unpopular opinion)

Continue the Series? Yes

Spoilers in review? YES MAJOR SPOILERS

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

I picked up the series pretty late into it's popularity, reading Fourth Wing in July of 2024 followed shortly by Iron Flame in August of the same year. I was in the mood for an easy to read, fun fantasy and it fit the bill perfectly.

The characters are fun, the world is interesting enough to make up for when romance gets boring and vice versa. As a lover of both romance and fantasy, I actually struggle with the romantasy genre as a whole. Most of the time I just find that instead of bringing the best parts of both fantasy and romance into one engaging story, books in the romantasy genre just do both halves of the portmanteau poorly.

I had always assumed I just hadn't read the right romantasy and The Empyrean series gives me hope that it's true.

Is Fourth Wing a literary masterpiece? Is it a immaculate example of complex world building? Or a love story that can rival the best of the best? No, of course not. But it's *fun* and *engaging* and makes me actually give a shit about the characters, which is not a common occurrence for me. Overall Fourth Wing and Iron Flame were a good time and earned 4.5 and 4.75 stars respectively (and yes I did like IF more than FW).

All that to say I was excited to read Onyx Storm and I went into the book with my head completely empty of theories and ready to have another good time. I did not do a re read ahead of starting the book and only watched a single two minute tiktok that gave me the spark notes of what previously happened in the series.

Likes:

As I referenced above, I really like all of the characters in this series, my previous favorite being either Sawyer or Imogen but my lord did this book make me love Ridoc. I of course liked his jokes and one-liners, but I also love the moments when he was serious, both with his concern with Xaden and Violets increasingly toxic relationship and his confrontation with the rest of the Iron Squad not seeing him as capable/powerful because he is humorous/fun loving. That said, I have been pronouncing his name wrong this whole time. I thought it was like the name Murdoc/Murdock (like from the band Gorillaz and the game Paragon), so 'Rye-doc' and it is not -- it's "Rid-ick".

To jump to another character, Xaden's arc over this section of the book was great. I enjoyed his struggle with the inevitability of his turning both feeling completely defeatist about it and still holding out hope, if only for Violets sake. And I assume by the end of the five book series, he will be saved/turned back, but I like that he still gave in this moment.

As he and Violet were traveling with Quest Squad (so happy for Ridoc that the name stuck lol) I started growing a little uncomfortable at how codependent and toxic their relationship was becoming. It felt like as Xaden was turning more and more venin, he was losing care for everything other than Violet. Some might find that romantic, but I personally find it to be more than a bit much. Which brings to mind two things: 1) I love that the woman who gave Violet the books completely called her out on how unhealthy the relationship was. 2) I glad that Ridoc stepped in and forced Violet to make a boundary and set up a support system for when Xaden eventually fully turns.

Dislikes:

Most of my "dislikes" are simple me being frustrated that we won't have answers to so many questions until we get the next book in the series, so they aren't really negatives. Those will be in the 'other notes' section. I do have a couple of problems though:

First, I don't like how quickly Violet got over the severed bond. Like we were told she laid in bed for four days, but that's about it? She was up and back to normal way too fast in my opinion. Like it seemed like she grieved Liam far longer than she did Andarna. I know she knew Liam for longer and that Andarna didn't die, she just left, but Andarna was bonded to Violets very *soul*.

The lore of the world makes it out to be that losing a dragon is worse than losing a spouse, even without the whole 'if your dragon dies, you die' part. I understand being a soldier and having work to do, but I just would have liked to see her grieve more for Andarna.

And speaking of grief, this may be a hot take, but Mira should have died. Or at the very least,

we should have had a more major death in the last battle. Like the most major death was Quinn and, while her death actually made me nearly cry, she wasn't *that* major of a character.

I need something irreversibly devastating to happen to Violet. Not like Liam, who she is kind of paying reparations to by taking care of Sloane. Not like Brennan, who came back to life. Not like Andarna who would eventually come back, even if she had actually stayed away for a few years. Not like Xaden who Violet will never give up on trying to turn back human. Not like her mother who she already had a complicated relationship with.

I need someone Violet loves to be gone with nothing to be done about it other than grieve. Some one irreplaceably important to Violet, namely either Mira or Rhiannon or (if Yarros wants to really hurt me) Ridoc. I want Yarros to have me nearly quitting the series because I am so upset over a death of a character. This thing with Mira being brought back from the brink has be worried that I won't ever get that major, heartbreaking death.

Other Notes:

I'm gonna be honest, when I first read Xaden's chapter at the end I was Very Confused™. Obviously now that I've seen other people's reactions, I'm aware that we don't know who the referenced 'brother' is, but at the time I thought I just wasn't understanding the words and I had missed the part where they said who the brother was. Since Panchek was there and he was the one giving information on Violets whereabouts to the Venin I assume he was the new brother? I don't know, with this series I like to complete avoid theorizing and just enjoy the ride, but I think I had leaned into the 'no thoughts, head empty' a bit too much.

I used to try and predict every book I read because I liked feeling smart, but it made me not like reading. It was almost like I had looked up a the twist of a movie and then went to see the film anyway. Obviously the twist can be impactful even if you know it ahead of time, but it makes it a lot harder to enjoy it in my personal experience.

In a similar vein, I also don't really enjoy watching/partaking in fandom theory-crafting or trying to get information out of authors for future seasons. I want to experience the story in its final form, not from Yarros hinting at future events/lore etc. I have seen a few theories as to who this mysterious brother is and a few about Andarna and her role in the last chapters plan, but honestly until the book is out -- I don't want to speculate. Others are 100% free to speculate and theorize and ask Yarros questions, but I'm gonna stay out of it.

Rating Breakdown

Characters: 10

Atmosphere: 8

Writing: 7

Plot: 7

Intrigue: 9

Logic: 9

Enjoyment: 9

Dialogue: 8

Total: 8.3/10 or 4.1 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

We Used to Live Here by Marcus Kliewer - Review

TL;DR

2.0 Stars

Pros: Good audiobook narrators, main character isn't a complete idiot, good writing/imagery

Cons: Unsatisfying conclusion, side plots drop off half way through, 'open to interpretation' ending feels more like author indecisiveness

Spoilers in review? Yes, major.

(This was a bookclub pick -- I'm not a thriller/horror fan, so surprise: I didn't like the thriller/horror book)

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

First, let me start off by saying: I'm not really a fan of thrillers or horror novels. I've read quite a few (~15 in the last 2 years) because they are amoung the popular genres in my bookclub, but the only ones that really hit for me were much more down the 'literary fiction' kind of lane.

Why don't I like them? To put it simply, I'm a pretty stoic person. I don't get strong emotions from most books: sad books don't make me cry, horror books don't scare me, thriller novels don't get my heart racing etc. Even movies/shows don't usually affect me in any way -- the only medium that has any consistent effect is music.

Additionally, I often feel like thrillers don't spend enough time on endearing me to the characters. As a result, I honestly don't care when awful/scary things happen to them. They may as well be no-name background characters for all that I know about them.

All that to say, I had no interest in reading this book, but I knew I had to because I run the bookclub that picked it. So take every single thing I say in this review with a massive heap of salt.

This only thing this book has going for it before I started is that is was marketed as a "reddit sensation". I was curious as to what the fuck that meant, because I've never seen a book advertised as that.

Likes:

Both narrators of the audiobook, Corey Brill and Jeremy Carlisle Parker, did a fantastic job. They both spoke way too slowly for my usual taste, but it adds to the spooky atmosphere of the book and was the right decision in my opinion. I did listen to a large portion of the book at 2x speed or higher, but the sections I did listen to at normal speed, very good performance by both narrators.

For the most part I liked Eve as a main character. I think she was a mostly reasonable protagonist. Outside of the initial dumb decision of letting five strangers into your house while you're home alone (which needed to happen to have a story at all), most of her choices later were at least semi-understandable, even if I wouldn't have made the same ones. Not the smartest character but she was not pull-your-hair-out dumb.

The writing was very descriptive and had some fantastic moments of imagery. And some of the subtle inconsistencies between different sources of information that Eve came across was very effective to induce the 'not everything is as it seems' feeling.

Dislikes:

The ending just felt like such... Nothing? Like Eve/Emma ended up in a psych ward and...? That's kind of it. Like Eve is now living a completely different life as Emma, but then what? I don't know, it just felt like there's no real conclusion.

The whole thing with Moe -- weird monkey thing in Eve's mind -- I don't really understand why he was there? And then he kind of just disappeared the second half of the book? This kind of drop off happened with quite a few times with characters/items that I thought might have been relevant to the ending. But nope!

As for the plot, to put it bluntly, I just couldn't give less of a shit basically the entire time. "Creepy" stuff would happen, like their stained glass window being replaced with a normal one, and I would just be like "...okay. And?"

"Oh you have ants in your house? You do live in a forest so that checks."

"Oh you're neighbor knows the stranger you let into your house and her memory doesn't perfectly align with what the stranger told you? Well she is old and this all happened like 30 years ago so yeah, I'm not surprised."

I know the point of the book was like "is Eve going through some kind of psychosis or was she actually sucked into an alternate reality", but by the end it felt like the author was like "Eh. Just let the reader believe whatever is scarier to them. I don't want to pick."

Its like if Kliewer had the option to depict the horror that is:

a) watching yourself lose your sense of reality through your declining mental health and, despite being completely aware that it's happening, knowing there's nothing you can do about it.

Or b) having your entire life, identity, and loved ones ripped away from you, leaving you helpless in an alternate world you'll likely never escape

And then chose to depict both but they're watered down to the point that it leaves the reader lost and unfulfilled. No way to know the author's intentions, but that's what it felt like.

Other Notes:

For me, thrillers as a whole just feel like either literary fiction without a message or a mystery without any intrigue.

It's like when your friend tells you about "something crazy that happened" to them, but it was just that they saw a stranger shouting on public transit or something equally mundane/common. It's only captivating the first time that you experience it. And depending on what the stranger said, it could be mildly interesting to the locals, but in all likelihood it's just nonsense with no real point. I would love to care, but I simply don't.

So yeah crazy that someone who is not a fan of thrillers didn't like the thriller book. If this wasn't the chosen book for my bookclub, I wouldn't have even picked it up. For this reason I was hesitant to make a review at all, but it is part of my goals to write a review of every book I read so that I will have it for the future. And so here we are.

Rating Breakdown:

Characters: 3

Atmosphere: 5

Writing: 6

Plot: 4

Intrigue: 1

Logic: 2

Enjoyment: 2

Dialogue:5

Total: 4.0/10 or 2.0 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Nightmare Before Kissmas by Sara Raasch - Review

TL;DR

4.6 Stars

Pros: loveable cast, surprisingly complex political system, perfect mix of silly and serious

Cons: puns abound, pace of post-confession relationship, absurd levels of PDA, representation

Continue the Series? Yes

Spoilers in review? Technically minor spoilers? But it's a romance book, we all know how it ends

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

I had just finished reading a lot of literary fiction covering heavy topics: Notes on an Execution by Danya Kukafka which covers the death penalty and the glorification of serial killers(5 stars), and My Dark Vanessa by Kate Elizabeth Russell which covers pedophilia/grooming and their long lasting effects on victims (also 5 stars)

After all that I desperately needed something silly and goofy. I bought this book way back in early October with the intention of reading it between Halloween and Christmas. I, in fact, did not do that and instead started it New Year's Day.

Additionally, I saw a TikTok video where it was that Read White and Royal Blue audio

"My life is the crown and yours is politics, and I will not trade one cage for the other."

"Look, I'm sorry I looked at Mrs. Riley and lightly grazed her left tit, alright? "

And after reading this book, I cannot think of a more apt description for the two romantic leads of this book.

Likes:

The biggest unexpected delight of this book was the fascinating politics of this world Raasch created.

To give some loose context, in this book, every holiday is essentially run by a family, from Christmas to Easter to Saint Patrick's Day. Our main character, Nicholas "Coal" Claus, is the Prince of Christmas and expected to inherit the role of Santa from his father. All Holidays seem to have a similar setup, but the ways in which they interact with each other are when things get interesting.

From arranged marriages to political hostages, strategic collectives to strong-armed allies, this 'silly little romance' book had much more meat on the bones than I had expected. And to put so incredibly bluntly, I am an absolute *slut* for well-crafted politics in books.

Additionally, I absolutely ADORED all of the characters in this book. Both Coal and his Prince of Halloween lover, Hex Hallows, were putting me at risk of a heart attack with how cute they were.

And Coal's dynamic with his younger brother, Kris, was incredibly heartwarming. It's the typical protective and caring big brother schtick but I absolutely ate it up. I won't give specifics for obvious reason but near the end, in their confrontation with their father?? If Coal hadn't already won my heart earlier in the book, he would have won it in that singular moment.

And our last main character! I especially enjoyed the character arc of Iris, the Easter Princess and Coal's (arranged) betrothed. She really comes into her own over the course of the book. I was really hoping that she would be the focus of the next book, but alas.

The writing was surprisingly poetic at times and decidedly silly at other times. For the lighter parts of the book, it's not exactly my style of humor, but I had a good time regardless. For the heavier parts though? It not only made me feel strong emotions, it also had me considering new ways of thinking about trauma and family dynamics.

Dislikes:

Listen, I like a good pun every now and again --love them even, but my god there were a lot of Christmas puns in this book. They're were mostly limited to corny holiday sweaters, but still an abundance of them, especially towards the beginning.

The lead up into Coal and Hex admitting their feelings was appropriately slow given the length of this book (~350 pages), but after the confession? My God these men are going a mile a minute. It's odd because in the spicy-er scenes Coal is very careful and wants to take things slow, but the in-world time from confession to 'I love you' was incredibly quick. They are only like 22-ish, but still.

On top of all that, their public displays of affection were just absurd. It was less the instances where their touches or words could be lost in a crowd, and more the over-the-top flirting and suggestive remarks in front of Iris and Kris. I don't know what other people's sibling relationships are like, but I would rather drop dead than talk sexy to my partner in front of my brother.

And then with Hex, specifically, I was a little confused about his lineage. My understanding is that his mother was part of the Dia de los Muertos Holiday and married into the Halloween family and he currently resides in Mexico City where he attends university. He also speaks Spanish a couple of times in the book. All this combined, I'd assume he would be give-to-take half-Latino, but he is literally described as a mix of "a vampire and Loki" so I'm not as sure now.

I am aware that Latino and White are not mutually exclusive, but it felt like it was worth pointing out. I will leave it to someone with the appropriate heritage to determine whether this representation was good or not.

Other Notes:

There are, if memory serves me well, only two sex scenes in this book. Neither are particularly descriptive. I don't think they even refered to either characters genitalia by name (no use of penis, ass, cock, dick, etc.). It was all very vague, which could be a good or bad thing depending on the reader.

That said, there is important character information discussed in the sex scenes so I would not recommend skipping them.

I don't particularly care one way or the other, but it did make it difficult to tell what was going on at some points. However, if sex scenes are included (and it's not a dark romance) I do expect for it to be at least semi-accurately done. I am still unsure if proper "preparation" was performed with how vaguely the scenes were written.

This book contains both group chats and pop culture references, which aren't my personal favorite, but they weren't bad enough to mention in the dislikes section.

And the marketing for this book compares it to Casey McQuiston's Red White and Royal Blue, and while it's not a bad comparison at all in terms of premise, I think it's more like Jenna Lavine's novels in writing style and characterization. She's a less popular author than McQuiston, but if you like Lavine's level of silly, you'll love this.

Final Thoughts and Rating Breakdown:

I ended up getting much more than I bargained for in the best way possible. Is it the most well-crafted piece of literature the world has ever seen? No, of course not. However, it blends fun characters, a whimsical atmosphere, and an interesting non-romance plot in ways that not a lot of other romance books can.

Characters: 9

Atmosphere: 9

Writing: 9

Plot: 10

Intrigue:10

Logic: 9

Enjoyment: 10

Dialogue:8

Total: 9.3/10 or 4.6 Stars

[romanreadsbooks]

The Bear and The Nightingale by Katherine Arden - Review

TL;DR

4.1 Stars

Pros: Characters, atmospheric writing style, glossary

Cons: Confusing character names/nicknames, slow paced

Continue the Series? Maybe

Spoilers in review? No

Opinions going in/why I picked it up:

I have a friend that I buddy read with and it was my turn to pick a book. I was a little reading slumpy/brain dead in December so I wanted a unserious romantasy with winter vibes that I could turn my brain off and read

I googled "winter romantasy" and The Bear and The Nightingale was what was recommended in a couple of Reddit threads. Now that I've read it, I don't think if I would classify it as 'romantasy' by the common definition of that genre. And it was very much a brain-heavy book, at least for me.

Luckily, just before this, I read A Gentleman in Moscow by Amor Towles (fantastic book btw), so I was already primed for all of the Russian terms and names. Additionally I am a frequent reader of fantasy so I am used to the early struggle of learning new terms/names/magic systems.

My buddy for this read did not fair well, unfortunately. She has not read any Russian-set books also does not read a ton of fantasy, so she did DNF the book. It was a little too dense and slow going for her at the time, which is understandable.

Likes:

Now, I have spent basically my entire life in places where it rarely gets below freezing and only snows once a decade, so take everything in this section with a grain of salt.

Basically I love winter.

It is by far my favorite season and I was always excited when my last employer would send me off to the northern states in the middle of January so I could live in the snow and spend time in the cold, middle of nowhere forest towns (and do my job I guess). Even though I was frozen to the bone, my heart was warmed.

This books brought that feeling to me despite it being ~40 degrees fahrenheit the majority of the time that I was reading it. The imagery Arden creates is so visceral and captivating that I felt the freezing ice of the world on my skin. We may not have gotten as much romance as I expected (more on that later), but we definitely got the 'Winter' side of it.

Another thing I really appreciate about the writing of this book is the dialogue. It was period appropriate without being difficult to read, which I fear is a common issue in some of the few historical fiction books I've read this far.

Additionally, I really liked all of the characters, even the stereotypical ones. There is of course the protective brother and evil step mother, but it felt much more like an homage to the core of fairytales rather than a overdone cliche.

And everyone say it with me: We love fantasy books with a glossary! Unfortunately it was at the back of the book, so I did not see it until I had already finished. But there is one at the back with the various creature names and descriptions. Definitely would have made heavy use of it had I'd known.

Dislikes:

To add to the confusion of learning a whole new cast of characters upon jumping into a book, there are multiple alternate names for the same character. For instance our main character, most often called Vasya, is also called Vasochka, Vedma, Vasily, and Vasilisa. All similar enough that you can often attribute it to the correct character, but still takes a second sometimes.

To my understanding this is very common in Russian or Russian-inspired literature, but that doesn't make it not confusing to the unfamiliar.

This next dislike is not at the fault of the book. It is purely my misunderstanding, but I wanted to mention it because it did impact my reading experience.

As I said, I specifically searched for 'romantasy', and so when I read The Bear and the Nightingale, I expected that romance would be at least noticably present. The entire time I was like "who the hell is the other half of this romance??"

After reading, I would absolutely consider this book just a straight up fantasy. The romance is so minor that it's barely there -- just a single, chaste 'i might not see you ever again' kiss. It's possible, if not likely, that it will be more prevalent as the series continues, but we're just focusing on book one here.

And I'm sorry but this book is *so* slow. It's barely over 300 pages but it felt like a 500+ page slog. A beautifully written, interesting story, but a slog none the less. I would hesitate to cut out anything, but perhaps one or two more active scenes could have been added to balance the slow pacing just a tiny bit.

At the same time I would warn against adding too many because you want to maintain the brutal, long winter vibe the book gives off. A difficult balance to strike, to be sure.

Other Notes:

Themes of Christianity depicted in the more "be afraid of God" kind of way than a "God is loving and forgiving" way. I have limited experience with the Christian faith, so it does not bother me, but if you are very devout/don't like to read works critical of Christianity, this might not be the book series for you.

This book is filled with transliterations of Russian folklore names into English and they are not always the most accurate. I personally know absolutely nothing about Russian folktales so I honestly didn't notice until the author pointed it out in their note at the end of the book.

There are names that have the same ending in Russian, but are spelled two different ways in the English names for no other purposes than to be nicer to the English-reading eye.

If you are someone who cares a lot about the accuracy of Russian language or are already familiar with Russian folktale names, the authors choices in the transliteration may annoy you.

Finally, the age of the main character. By the end of the book Vasya is like 14. The book is set in 14th century Russia (Rus') in an aristocrat family's estate, so women are married off basically as soon as they have gone through puberty. I suppose it's "normal" for the time and social class, but still a little uncomfortable to me personally.

Rating Breakdown:

Characters: 9

Atmosphere: 10

Writing: 9

Plot:8

Intrigue: 8

Logic:7

Enjoyment: 8

Dialogue: 7

Total: 8.25/10 or 4.1 stars

[romanreadsbooks]

Funny Story by Emily Henry - Review

TL;DR:

3.7 Stars

Pros: Characters, dialogue/chemistry, and comforting plot

Cons: Too long, out-of-pocket comment, and a personal pet peeve

Opinions going in:

I've read and loved Book Lovers by the same author, and I knew the whole "Roommates with my ex-fiancé's new fiancée's ex-boyfriend" premise, but other than that I went in blind.

What made me actually pick it up though was 2 things: 1)I'm in a bit of a slump and needed something light/silly/goofy/simple and 2) My hold on this eBook became available at my local library

Likes:

The characters were all super fun and real to me, if a little too emotionally intelligent. Their various personalities were different enough that they all felt distinct and yet still similar enough that they still had chemistry.

A speaking of chemistry -- Oh my Lord did Daphne and Miles have chemistry. While it didn't make me laugh as much as Book Lovers did, I still loved all of their banter and back-and-forth. Not to mention how their cuteness and care for one another was so sweet. There were so many times that I was smiling on the train to and from work like an absolute idiot.

The plot was very straight forward/simple/predictable, but that's what I needed at the time and one of my main motivating factors when I pick up a contemporary romance, so complaints from me.

Dislikes:

This was one singular line that really isn't that bad it just stuck out to me. At one point in the book, fairly late into the romance, Daphne is very upset about something and Miles is trying to console her. He's being super sweet and supportive then out of no-where goes:

"And you're also hot, if that helps."

And like..? I don't know if he was trying to make her laugh, ease the tension, or what, but it was so out of left field for the moment. It's like 'Oh you're upset? that's okay, you'll get through this, is there anything I can do to help, your feelings are valid, also you're sexy as fuck haha'

And just??? Again, one singular line, so not that impactful for my final score, just very odd to me.

Another not-super-impactful dislike, but I am so tired of characters who have some relation to/career in books/literature/publishing. If you expand this net to also include characters who just like to read/are a reader, then it happens more often than not.

This is a completely personal (and probably unpopular) opinion and does not make a book 'bad' by any means. I understand 100% why this is common: authors are often given the advice to write what they know and its an easy way to get your audience to connect with the character, etc, etc. -- It just personally doesn't work for me.

I will probably make a longer post about this pet peeve of mine in the future, but I'll stop there for now.

In a similar vein, any time an author puts in a line about how "books let me escape" or "reading lets me live so many lives" I just cringe at how trite it sounds 95% of the time -- this books instances included.

My biggest complaint: This book needed to be at least 50 pages shorter. Even though I was actively enjoying it, I got to the end of a chapter, saw I was at page 301, and was baffled that there were 80+ pages left.

Like I said before, I did like all of the characters, but I still think that one of the side characters should have been cut. They all serve a purpose in the story, so I understand why they are all there, but it was harming the pacing.

Rating Breakdown:

The rating system I am going to use is based on Book Roast's CAWPILE system -- you can learn more about it on their channel. The only change is that I added dialogue as a separate category from writing.

Total: 7.4/10 or 3.7 stars

Characters: 8

Atmosphere: 6

Writing: 6

Plot:5

Intrigue: 7

Logic:6

Enjoyment: 5

Dialogue: 9

[romanreadsbooks]

Favorite (and least favorite) Books of 2024

Stand-alones:

#1 - Monday's Not Coming by Tiffany D Jackson (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

YA Mystery -  An absolute heartbreaking and tragic story that I cannot recommend enough (check trigger warnings though). A harrowing look at how life and society treats those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds - especially young black girls. Whenever harm comes to them, no one seems to care, and so the abuse continues. 

#2 - Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes by Suzanne Collins(⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

YA Dystopian Fantasy - Prequel to The Hunger Games and I know a lot of people have mixed feelings about this but I think it is a masterpiece of a character study. You take Snow who, at the start, is actually a kind of underdog hero in rich society that you want to root for until you remember what he becomes. Then you wonder -- how the hell does that this boy become that man? And worst of all? You find out. You see every step of his corruption and while you don't agree with him, you understand why he made the choices he did. 

#3 - Notes on an Execution by Danya Kukafka (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Adult Literary fiction - An examination of the public response and perception of sensationalized serial killers. How society often weirdly idolizes violent men and sees them as some kind of tragic victim or unrealized genius instead of what they are - horrible people who violently slaughter because they just felt like it. I've been largely indifferent to "true crime" sensationalism so far in my life, but this book left me being wary of media perception of (white) violent criminals.

#4 - My Dark Vanessa by Kate Elizabeth Russel (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Adult Literary Fiction - Indepth look at grooming/pedophilia through the eyes of a young teen victim. A horrifying and too real example of how things like this can and do happen. Shows the long lasting effects of groomed and how that can often lead to the victim throwing themselves into more and more toxic situations. 

Annnnd my last one is much less serious/heavy lmao:

#5 - Bride by Ali Hazelwood (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

Adult Supernatural Romance (romantasy? Idk) -  people say it's Omegaverse, but it's not, it's really just Vampires and Werewolves. But! Still very fun and has great, fun dialogue. It's a little unserious, but it knows and plays into it. Very very good pallet cleanser book.

Honorable mention:

Radio Silence - Alice Oseman (⭐⭐⭐⭐.5)

YA Contemporary fiction - I really liked all the characters and the reality that can come with doxxing a faceless creator online. Not five stars just cause it was missing that special spark but very good! (also demi rep in published fiction lets goooo)

Series:

Three Dark Crows Series by Kendare Blake (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

4-book YA Epic fantasy series - Three triplet sisters with different magical powers must fight to the death to become the queen. A little teen angsty at some point but I find teen angst incredibly amusing/entertaining so I had a good time. Is it the best writing? No. Was it very entertaining? Absolutely.

Goldstone Saga by Jocelynn Drake (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐)

6-book Adult Epic Fantasy Series - On Kindle unlimited. Very much Marauders fanfic vibes. I loved all the characters a lot. Not one of those where it's like "it's worth it once you get to the third book!", you'll know if you like it by the end of book one. I was rooting for every romance and the plot was fun to follow along with.  Some serious topics weren't handled great imo, but altogether very enjoyable series.

Least Favorites:

Corrupt by Penelope Douglas (⭐⭐) 

Adult Dark(?) Romance - I heard a clip from the audiobook and was like 'Damn that's hot', turns out the clip is from the fourth book in the series ^-^' This book however was awful to read. It got two stars instead of 1 cause it was so absurd at times it made me laugh

Not in Love by Ali Hazelwood (⭐⭐)

Adult Erotic Romance - Some parts felt vaguely aro-phobic, the Rue(FMC) was just meh over all, and Eli(MMC)is just awful. Only good point was that I think it handled reality of food insecurity pretty well, so also 2 stars

The Perfect Marriage by Jeneve Rose (⭐)

I'm sorry, but what was this book?? All of the characters were annoying. The "mystery" was just the MC leaving out crucial details so the reader wouldn't know just for fun. So many plot points were picked up and dropped (I assume they were supposed to be red herrings?).. Overall, it was a very poorly executed mystery.