rawrdogger

[rawrdogger]

for a short period of time my daughter hated jerma and would complain whenever she walked into the room to find him on the tv, but now she is five and a half years old and she loves him, "because he says 'what the fuck'".

[rawrdogger]

I am a violin maker learning to tattoo so here is a banana with the decoration from the Hellier Strad violin

[rawrdogger]

Just tried to play an ancient flute and it started filling the room with this awful miasma that wont go away

[rawrdogger]

While I, on the one hand, understand monogamy has been enforced politically throughout history as a means of ensuring lines of inheritance and the dominance of men over women (hence also why polygamy has been permitted insofar as men are allowed to own multiple wives); I also don't think the construct of the so-called monogamous relationship is inherently worthless or harmful. This is certainly not the popular opinion among those with an understanding of monogamy's history, where an understandable advocacy of doing away with monogamy, along with other harmful structures of domestic person-ownership, like the family, is common - but I do think the structure, outside the social system of enforced monogamy, has positive aspects. As a professional diver, I'm well-acquainted with the buddy system: whenever diving, no matter how many are present, divers are paired into buddy-teams, who are each fully responsible for each other. Doing so is the only safe method - in an emergency, a diver's life may rely on another diver noticing they're in distress and reacting within only a few seconds. Having someone whose sole focus is yourself (and someone who is your sole focus) is an incredibly important safety net. Obviously, if an issue occurs with another diver, anyone available comes to their aid, but they are always responsible for their buddy, and vice versa. As a dive leader, I've dived without a buddy before - the idea is that 'everyone in the group is my buddy', but in truth, it's just diving without anyone specifically looking out for you, and it's something you can only do if you're competent enough for it. I was responsible for everyone in my group, and nobody was responsible for me. I can see these general bases for the buddy system applying to broader life in general. Do I think monogamy is for everyone? No, it obviously is not. But, neither do I think it's for nobody.

[rawrdogger]

[rawrdogger]

[rawrdogger]

Published Jan 14, 2025

[rawrdogger]

The Aquarium's first animal 🐈💙

[rawrdogger]

BTW the person tweeting is a Palestinian in '48 so

[rawrdogger]

eula style diluc

[rawrdogger]

just cast the fire spell. dip shit

[rawrdogger]

Dog does not understand

[rawrdogger]

highlight

[rawrdogger]

on the 11th day of christmas my mutual gave to me softcore middle aged man pornography

[rawrdogger]

[rawrdogger]

Bruh

[rawrdogger]

Best RPF Ship - FINAL!