nv5geospatial

[nv5geospatial]

The Pros and Cons of Different Bridge Inspection Technologies

Bridge inspections are critical to ensuring that some of our country’s most crucial infrastructure elements stay structurally sound and safe.

Bridge inspection technology is key to ensuring that these inspections are as accurate and undisruptive as possible. 

The technology used to inspect bridges has rapidly increased in sophistication over the past 20 years. 

What was once done with chains and boots-on-the-ground is now possible with airplanes and infrared technology. Although there is still a place for older methods of bridge inspection. 

In this article, we’ll walk you through some of the different forms of bridge inspection and outline what scenarios each method is ideal for.

Visual Inspection

Visual inspection remains a fundamental aspect of bridge assessment, serving as a starting point for identifying obvious defects. 

This method is cost-effective and requires minimal equipment, allowing inspectors to detect surface-level issues like cracks, spalling, and corrosion.

 It also enables immediate identification of urgent repairs, which can be crucial for maintaining public safety. 

However, visual inspection has its limitations. It's restricted to surface-level defects and can be highly subjective, depending on the inspector's expertise. 

Visual inspections can be time-consuming for large structures and may miss subsurface issues that could compromise the bridge's integrity.

Visual inspections are usually paired with other auditory and tactile techniques.

Acoustic Techniques

Bridge inspectors can detect damage to bridges using acoustic methods, such as chain dragging and hammer sounding.

The different sounds that are made when applying chains or hammers to the bridge’s surface indicate whether there are fractures, or delaminations, within the bridge’s structure.

These techniques are relatively inexpensive and easy to implement, requiring minimal training for inspectors. 

However, acoustic techniques are not without drawbacks. They are labor-intensive and time-consuming, especially for large bridge decks. 

The results are subject to human error and interpretation, which can lead to inconsistencies in assessments. Additionally, these methods are not effective on bridges with asphalt overlays and have a limited depth of detection.

They also require bridges to be shut down to traffic, which can frustrate the public.

Thermal Infrared (TIR) Inspection

Thermal Infrared (TIR) technology is a scientific tool for bridge inspections that is more accurate and hands-off than traditional techniques. 

Here’s how it works: TIR tech detects temperature differences within a bridge’s structure, which indicate issues such as delamination

However, several different ways are available to collect TIR data, and some are less disruptive than others.

TIR With Mobile, Ground-Based Vehicles

Mobile, ground-based vehicles equipped with TIR cameras offer a practical solution for bridge deck inspections. 

These vehicles can cover large areas quickly, minimizing traffic disruption and allowing for consistent data collection at highway speeds. 

This approach is particularly useful for assessing long bridge spans or multiple bridges in a single session. 

However, ground-based TIR inspections are limited to deck surfaces accessible by vehicle, which may exclude some bridge components. 

In some cases, lane closures may be necessary, causing temporary traffic inconveniences. 

Additionally, this method is less effective for inspecting the undersides of bridges, which can be critical areas for detecting structural issues.

TIR With Fixed-Wing Aircrafts

Fixed-wing aircraft equipped with TIR cameras offer a comprehensive solution for bridge inspection technology. 

This method can survey multiple bridges in a single flight, providing a wide-area perspective that is particularly efficient for large-scale infrastructure assessments. 

Aircraft-based TIR inspections cause minimal traffic disruption and can capture both deck and underside imagery, offering a more complete view of the bridge's condition. 

However, this approach has higher initial costs compared to ground-based methods. It's also weather-dependent, which can lead to scheduling challenges. 

Special permits may be required for low-altitude flights, adding to the logistical complexity. 

While aircraft-based TIR provides excellent coverage, it may offer less detail than close-range inspections.

TIR With Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or Drones

UAVs or drones equipped with TIR cameras have gained popularity in bridge inspection due to their versatility. These devices are highly maneuverable, allowing access to difficult areas that might be challenging or dangerous for human inspectors.

 They can capture high-resolution imagery and are cost-effective for individual bridge inspections, causing minimal traffic disruption. 

However, drones have limitations in flight time and range, which can be problematic for large bridges or extensive surveys. They are also susceptible to wind and weather conditions, potentially affecting data quality or preventing inspections altogether.

 Operating drones requires skilled pilots and compliance with aviation regulations, which adds to the complexity of this method.

Other Non-TIR Bridge Inspection Technologies

While thermal infrared solutions offer significant advantages, other bridge inspection technologies also play important roles in comprehensive assessments.

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)

Ground Penetrating Radar is a non-destructive testing method that uses electromagnetic pulses to detect subsurface defects and rebar corrosion in bridge structures. 

It has the advantage of working through asphalt overlays and providing depth information, which is crucial for assessing the internal condition of bridge decks. 

However, GPR requires specialized equipment and expertise to operate effectively. Data interpretation can be complex, requiring trained professionals to analyze the results accurately. 

While GPR is excellent for detecting certain types of defects, it is less effective than TIR technology in identifying delaminations.

Final Thoughts

As bridge inspection technology continues to evolve, engineers and inspectors have an array of tools at their disposal. 

Thermal infrared solutions, particularly those deployed via fixed-wing aircraft, offer a compelling combination of efficiency and effectiveness for large-scale bridge assessments. 

However, less sophisticated bridge inspection techniques still have their place in infrastructure assessment. 

When selecting bridge inspection technology, factors such as bridge type, size, location, and specific inspection goals should be considered. By leveraging the strengths of different inspection methods, agencies can develop more effective maintenance strategies, ultimately ensuring the safety and longevity of our critical infrastructure. 

The future of bridge inspection lies in the intelligent integration of these diverse technologies, which would create a more robust and efficient system for maintaining our vital transportation networks.

[nv5geospatial]

Mobile Mapping Explained

Mobile mapping is a technique used to survey infrastructure through the use of vehicles rather than boots-on-the-ground efforts. 

These vehicles, including automobiles, drones, and boats, are equipped with various sensors, including LiDAR technology, cameras, and GPS receivers. The sensors rapidly collect detailed 3D data of the environment as the vehicle moves. 

The result is an accurate 3D model of the surroundings, which can be used for a wide variety of applications in transportation, urban planning, and infrastructure management.

It’s not only more accurate than on-the-ground surveys but it is safer and less disruptive.

How Mobile Mapping Works

The core technology behind mobile mapping is LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), which uses laser pulses to measure distances between the sensor and surrounding objects. 

The data collected creates a "point cloud," representing the scanned environment in 3D. 

Alongside LiDAR, high-resolution cameras capture imagery, which can be integrated with the LiDAR data to enhance its visualization. 

The vehicle also uses GPS and sensors called inertial measurement units to ensure data accuracy even while moving or encountering bumps in the road. 

The mobile mapping process typically follows these steps:

Data Collection: A vehicle equipped with LiDAR sensors, cameras, and GPS systems captures detailed data on roads, buildings, and other infrastructure as it moves along the planned route.

Data Processing: Specialized software processes the raw data, aligning and filtering it to create accurate and usable geospatial information. Algorithms integrate the different datasets, ensuring accuracy and consistency.

Analysis and Visualization: The data is analyzed using tools that can extract meaningful insights, such as identifying structural issues in roads or bridges. It is then visualized through interactive 3D models or maps for easier interpretation and decision-making​.

Applications in Transportation Projects

Mobile mapping is highly suited for various transportation infrastructure projects due to its accuracy and efficiency:

Roadway and Rail Network Mapping: This technique maps road surfaces, rail lines, and surrounding infrastructure, such as bridges and signage. The data generated supports road design, maintenance, and expansion projects.

Bridge and Tunnel Inspection: Mobile mapping is ideal for detecting structural issues, such as cracks and deformations, without disrupting traffic​, because it can capture data under bridges and tunnels.

Right-of-Way (ROW) Surveys: Detailed mapping of road corridors allows transportation agencies to manage their right-of-way assets efficiently, making it easier to plan for expansions or repairs​.

Accuracy of Mobile Mapping

Mobile mapping achieves impressive accuracy down to just centimeters.  

The accuracy depends on the quality of the sensors used, the speed of the data acquisition, and the environmental conditions. 

Compared to airborne LiDAR, mobile mapping typically provides higher-resolution data since the sensors are closer to the ground​.

Mobile Mapping vs. Traditional Surveying Methods

Mobile mapping offers several advantages over traditional surveying:

Speed: It collects data much faster than manual methods, which require surveyors to walk the project area, often over multiple days. With mobile mapping, large areas can be scanned in a fraction of the time, sometimes within hours.

Safety: By eliminating the need for surveyors to physically access dangerous or high-traffic areas, mobile mapping enhances safety for workers.

Data Detail: Mobile mapping captures significantly more data than manual surveys, providing a complete 3D model of the environment, rather than just individual points of interest​

Mobile mapping first started gaining popularity in the 1980s, and it is still growing — now projected to be a sector of the market worth $105 billion by 2029.

Using Mobile Mapping Data

Once collected, the data from mobile mapping can be used in numerous ways:

3D Modeling: Engineers use the detailed 3D models for designing transportation infrastructure, including roads, railways, and bridges.

Asset Management: Transportation departments use the data to manage and monitor infrastructure assets, from traffic signs to utilities.

Maintenance Planning: The collected data supports proactive maintenance by identifying issues such as pavement cracks, surface deformations, or vegetation encroachments, enabling timely repairs​.

In conclusion, mobile mapping is a highly effective and efficient tool for collecting geospatial data, particularly for transportation projects. 

Its ability to capture detailed, high-accuracy data quickly and safely makes it a superior choice over traditional surveying methods, especially in complex environments like roadways and rail networks. 

As technology continues to evolve, mobile mapping will become increasingly important in infrastructure development and maintenance.