morphedphaseblog - Tumblr blog

morphedphaseblog · 5 years ago

Note

The short stories thing is so true! I'm so glad you mentioned it because I totally forgot to gush about it.

I definitely agree that without the short stories the book would have been super flat, but the variety with Zachary's main plotline and snippets of short stories made reading this super entertaining! I actually think that Erin Morgenstern is such a genius at writing perfect short fairytales that she actually makes the characters there way more lovable and easier to connect to. For example I loved the innkeeper after reading three sentences about him, while for Zachary it took me a while. I love the examples you showed of the two guards, they kind of flew over my head so I'm so glad you pointed it out. It definitely shows for Morgenstern's short story genius, and the characters there feel almost more alive than some of our main ones.

The short stories really raised the entire book to a whole new level, and when they looped back into the main plotline I was so hyped.

I definitely agree with all the points you made about the short stories, I couldn't have put it better myself!

What do you think was the most interesting aspect of the book? The storytelling? Characters? Writing? Something else?

Thanks so much for the ask!

There are so many beautiful things about this book, but I think the short stories really stood out. They suited Morgenstern’s writing style and allowed her to create very enchanting and fairytale-like stories. I loved how she was able to make me feel for the characters in so few pages (when I wasn’t even able to connect with Zachary and the others). When I read the first story about the pirate and the girl, I immediately fell in love with them, and knew the book would be special.

At the start of the book I was expecting the short stories to be supplementary to the main plot, so finding out that they were all intertwined made them that much more meaningful.

It’s hard for me to explain exactly what made these short stories so beautiful, but here are a few things I liked:

1. Personification (I think you also mentioned this in your review) . Throughout these stories, Morgenstern personifies abstract concepts and creates characters out of them . Yes this also happens in the main narrative (with the Keeper and Mirabel), but it’s so much more interesting in the short stories. My favorite example of this has to be the Moon and the innkeeper. The idea of two people sharing myths about the moon and the sun and the cosmos, only for one of them to end up being the moon, was just gorgeous and enchanting.

2. Magical atmosphere. Of course the whole book feels very magical, but the short stories are where this fairy-tale element really shines. Some of these stories made me feel a child-like sense of wonder. For example, when the key collector is visited by a traveller and she finds her key, opens a door in the sky, takes his hand and disappears into another world. Little things like this are unexpected and charming.

3. Brevity. Obviously short stories have to be short, and consequently, the world-building, characters and plot all have to be condensed. Morgenstern does this really well, establishing characters’ personalities and the setting in very few words. For example, see how she gives life to these two guards from the first story:

The guard sits in a chair by the door and reads crime serials on faded paper, wishing he were an idealized, fictional version of himself. Wondering if the difference between pirates and thieves is a matter of boats and hats.

Here’s guard 1, a hopeless romantic who wishes he led a different life. He yearns for adventure and escapes his plain reality through the pages of books. He also questions the morality of his position, wondering what exactly makes the pirate deserving of such a sentence. There’s also a hint of jealousy, he thinks that in another life, he might have been the pirate. You can deduce all this from only two sentences. Quite remarkable.

This guard is shorter and does not read. He wishes to be no one but himself, he lacks the imagination to conjure alter egos, even the imagination to empathize with the man behind the bars, the only other soul in the room beyond the mice. He pays elaborate amounts of attention to his shoes when he is not asleep. (He is usually asleep.)

Here she’s able to create a contrasting personality for guard 2, who’s much more matter-of-fact and realistic. He doesn’t bother to (and probably can’t) imagine himself leading a different life. He’s not a free-thinker and accepts things as they are; if society tells him the pirate is a criminal deserving of punishment, then the pirate is a criminal deserving of punishment. No questions asked.

It’s simple things like this that made these stories so captivating. They were a refreshing change from Zachary’s plotline, and allowed for a whole atmosphere to be created. I really think that without them, the novel would have been far less interesting.

This response was a little longer than I had anticipated. But anyway, what do you guys think? What was your favorite aspect of the book? Feel free to answer (either by replying or reblogging) and I’ll be sure to share your response with the rest of the club.

16 notes · View notes

morphedphaseblog · 5 years ago

Text

I'm so glad you enjoyed my review!

I definitely feel the characters were sacrificed for the writing and the world building, which isn't too bad if you're more plot oriented.

I love noticing or remembering quotes and moments in books I hadn't noticed before. It adds to the experience by seeing the book through someone else's eyes.

Have a great day:)

The starless sea by Erin Morgenstern

Goodreads version

The introduction

This is just to warn everyone that I’m not a literature student, an English major nor a native English speaker, so I’m sorry in advance if this is a jumbled mess. I tend to ramble a lot but I’ve really tried to keep this as short as possible. (Short meaning a little bit over two thousand words for one review, I’ve never written a review this long.) I wrote this for self indulgence and for my lovely book club @readerbookclub

The first impression

This book pleasantly surprised me, it was like a very long dream that you don’t want to wake up from. The moment I finished it I wished that I hadn’t because I couldn’t part from it just yet. It would feel almost like cheating, I wanted the intertwined stories to continue and for me to remain in its trance, lost in the beautiful writing and bizarre world.

I will be the first to admit that when someone says the story is written almost poem-like, in prose, and similar, I will immediately think of meaningless quotes that are there just to look pretty. Characters saying things just to sound deep, frilly writing that leads nowhere, and dragged on descriptions that had no place being that long and boring. Those are the first things I think of when I’m confronted with someone explaining those kinds of books to me, and that’s completely my fault. This book was none of that, it was captivating from the first page to the last.

“There is a pirate in the basement. (The pirate is a metaphor but also still a person.) ”

I can tell you, when I first read this, on the first goddamn page, I was hooked. This book has a strong bizzare sort of setting, one that almost reminds me of Neil Gaiman, distinctively Neverwhere with its underground society and twisted perceptions of reality, and yet this book stands out on its own as an individual. It’s definitely a unique book, one that I’m still hesitant to part from.

The writing

This book has a very unique writing style, one that is extremely consistent throughout the book. There’s nothing I hate more than an inconsistent writing style that changes without a reason. The author plays around with words and describes things simply yet poetically. There were only maybe two instances where I thought the writing was a bit pretentious, but ultimately the good outweighs the bad.

I don’t know what exactly it is, but I will try and explain through the next few quotes:

“The book is mis-shelved in the fiction section, even though the majority of it is true and the rest is true enough”

(This really gives you the sense of vague foreshadowing in the book, where even though the description tells you sweet sorrows is mostly true you don’t realise how true it actually is. I never saw the fact that the characters in that book would be actual people that interact with our main characters. Plus the writing is really pretty)

“It’s binding has been cracked a handful of times, once a professor even perused the first few pages and intended to come back to it but forgot about it instead.”

(Is it just me but these small detailed descriptions really give you a sense of real world happenings and that the story is really set in the real world. You can imagine people passing their fingers over the spine of the book before glancing around and getting distracted with something else. The professor taking it into his hands and skimming it but ultimately forgetting all about it later, and finally Zachary reading the whole book from top to bottom.)

“His dark hair is grading at the temples, framing a face that would be called handsome if the word rugged or unconventionally were attached to it.”

(Now I’m in love with this kind of mental visual, it’s fun and it almost plays with your expectations. I just really like small things like these, they immediately make my reading extremely entertaining.)

“Someone in the corner is dressed as a highly recognizable author or, Zachary thinks as he gets a closer look, it might be that highly recognizable author.”

(Again as before, this is the kind of writing I like. It plays with your imaginary visuals of what’s happening and making them ten times more fun, especially when we confirm a bit later that that had indeed been that highly recognizable author.)

“He walks over bones he mistakes for dust and nothingness he mistakes for bones.”

(Yet another example of those fun visuals, I didn’t even realise how many of these I had marked until I had to go through them for this review. I just adore this writing style.)

I have so many more of these so here are just a few more to really make this review even longer:

“A portrait of a young man in a coat with a great many buttons but the buttons are all tiny clocks, from the collar to the cuffs, each reading different times.”

“His face is so much more than hair and eye colour, she wonders why books do not describe the curves of noses or the length of the eyelashes. She studies the shape of his lips. Perhaps a face is too complicated to capture in words.”

“There are dozens of giant statues. Some figures have animal heads and others have list their heads entirely. They are listed throughout the space in a way that looks so organic that Zachary would not be surprised if they moved, or perhaps they are moving, very, very slowly.”

“The figure in the chair is carved from snow and ice. As her gown cascades down around the chair the ripples in the fabric become waves, and within waves there are ships and sailors and sea monsters and then the sea within her gown is lost in the drifting snow.”

“Allegra watches him with studied interest from the other end of the table, the way one watches a tiger in a zoo or possibly the way the tiger watches the tourists.”

“It sounds strange and empty now, in her head. Rhyme can hear the hum of the past stories though they are low and quiet, the stories always calm once they have been written down whether they are past stories or present stories or future stories.

It is the absence of the high-pitched stories of the future that is the most strange. There is the thrum of what will pass in the next few minutes buzzing in her ears- so faint compared to the tales layered upon tales that she once heard- and then nothing. Then this place will have no more tales to tell.” .

(Probably one of my favourites, it really highlights everything I like about this style of writing.)

Another kind of writing style I noticed in the book was an abundance of making things literally feel alive, giving human emotions to objects, personification. I don’t come across this too often in other books, and when it happens it isn’t repeated as often in that same book,since it tends to get old, but as we have already learned Erin Morgenstern never makes this boring. She plays around with this and never seems to stop, adding another layer to her writing cake. I love how she gives these characteristics to even the smallest of crevices hidden in shadows, something just people wouldn’t even think of.

“He takes his torch and explores the shadows, away from the doors and the tent, among jagged crystals and forgotten architecture. He carries the light into places long unfamiliar with illumination that accept it like a half-remembered dream.”

“Outside the inn the wind howls, confused by this turn of events. (The wind does not like to be confused. Confusion ruins it’s sense of direction and direction is everything to the wind.)”

“The wind howls after him as he leaves in fear of what is to come, but a mortal cannot understand the wishes of the wind no matter how loud it cries and so these final warnings go unheeded.”

“If the sword could sigh with relief as it is taken from its scabbard it would, for it has been lost and found so many times before and it knows this time will be the last.”

One more thing that caught my eye in the writing was also the composition, where we technically start with in medias Res. We find out by the end of the book that everything that has happened was one big ass story wrapped in stories and overlapped with other stories. So Zachary literally comes in not even in the middle of the story, but at the very end that has been overdue for quite some time. This makes for a very interesting storyline as all the other storylines intertwine into eachother, it makes for an even more interesting read as our MC comes in only when the plot is at its end, tipping over the very edge.

(I also got the feeling that the entire book is almost told through the perspective of the story, if that makes any sense whatsoever. It’s almost like the story, that is bound together like the most complicated twister game, is alive and is smiling over our characters smugly waiting for everything to run its course. Like an omnipresent god, that’s at least the vibe I got reading the book. )

The world building

Now in my opinion the world building goes hand in hand with the writing in this book. Every detail I mentioned before builds the atmosphere and the base of all the world building in this book. The way the plot is written is written also contributes to the world building, as all the stories overlap and meet at the very end. The looping plot line is actually my number one favourite thing in the entire book.

There isn’t that much to say except ‘what the hell is going on?’ in the best way possible, to the world building, because as confusing as it can be it’s amazing to read and I think that it’s one of my favourite aspects of the book.

The Characters

Now is time for the weakest part of the book, its characters, who even though I think are amazing, are definitely flatter than everything else in the book.

In my opinion most characters personalities I just can’t pinpoint, and even though this personally doesn’t take away from my enjoyment too much, I know a lot of people love well defined character personalities.

For some characters I can understand the constant change in character, like Mirabel, whose multiple lifetimes make it so it makes sense why her personalities overlap and make little sense. She constantly felt a bit inconsistent to me, but again I personally didn’t think it ruined the book.

The most well developed personalities I could feel were Kat and the keeper, and at times Dorian. Zachary is a weird gray area for me, because even though I loved his character, I can’t really tell who he is besides the son of the fortuneteller. I think that most of the character building was sacrificed to make the plot and the world feel alive. As I said before, it feels like the omnipresent god and the world is more developed than any of the characters personalities.

I usually love marking all ‘character moments’ where I feel like I can understand what kind of person the character is, their sense of humour, friendship, socializing, thinking and so on. But I found myself marking basically nothing of that kind in this book, just the beautiful descriptions of the world. The story was just more alive than the characters in it.

I liked all the romances even though they all lacked some depth, but the fairytale style writing of the romance definitely made them extremely enjoyable. If it weren’t for the fairytale vibe all the romance would have been just flat, and I wouldn’t be invested at all.

The Conclusion

I wouldn’t reccomend this book for everyone, as I think great many people wouldn’t be fans of the writing, and so the lack of character depth wouldn’t help either and there would be no good to outweigh the bad. I truly think this book is a perfect 4 starts but to me personally it is 5 stars. I am just such a big fan of the looping storyline, I still haven’t gotten over that. To finish it all off here are a few extra quotes that I liked:

“No one takes responsibility. Everyone assumes someone else will do it, so no one does.”

“It is critical to steep the tests in ignorance to result in uncorrupted responses.”

“They all have similar elements, though. All stories do, no matter what form they take. Something was, and then something changed. Change is what a story is, after all.”

12 notes · View notes

morphedphaseblog · 5 years ago

Text

The starless sea by Erin Morgenstern

Goodreads version

The introduction

This is just to warn everyone that I'm not a literature student, an English major nor a native English speaker, so I'm sorry in advance if this is a jumbled mess. I tend to ramble a lot but I've really tried to keep this as short as possible. (Short meaning a little bit over two thousand words for one review, I've never written a review this long.) I wrote this for self indulgence and for my lovely book club @readerbookclub

The first impression

This book pleasantly surprised me, it was like a very long dream that you don't want to wake up from. The moment I finished it I wished that I hadn't because I couldn't part from it just yet. It would feel almost like cheating, I wanted the intertwined stories to continue and for me to remain in its trance, lost in the beautiful writing and bizarre world.

I will be the first to admit that when someone says the story is written almost poem-like, in prose, and similar, I will immediately think of meaningless quotes that are there just to look pretty. Characters saying things just to sound deep, frilly writing that leads nowhere, and dragged on descriptions that had no place being that long and boring. Those are the first things I think of when I'm confronted with someone explaining those kinds of books to me, and that's completely my fault. This book was none of that, it was captivating from the first page to the last.

"There is a pirate in the basement. (The pirate is a metaphor but also still a person.) "

I can tell you, when I first read this, on the first goddamn page, I was hooked. This book has a strong bizzare sort of setting, one that almost reminds me of Neil Gaiman, distinctively Neverwhere with its underground society and twisted perceptions of reality, and yet this book stands out on its own as an individual. It's definitely a unique book, one that I'm still hesitant to part from.

The writing

This book has a very unique writing style, one that is extremely consistent throughout the book. There's nothing I hate more than an inconsistent writing style that changes without a reason. The author plays around with words and describes things simply yet poetically. There were only maybe two instances where I thought the writing was a bit pretentious, but ultimately the good outweighs the bad.

I don't know what exactly it is, but I will try and explain through the next few quotes:

"The book is mis-shelved in the fiction section, even though the majority of it is true and the rest is true enough"

(This really gives you the sense of vague foreshadowing in the book, where even though the description tells you sweet sorrows is mostly true you don't realise how true it actually is. I never saw the fact that the characters in that book would be actual people that interact with our main characters. Plus the writing is really pretty)

"It's binding has been cracked a handful of times, once a professor even perused the first few pages and intended to come back to it but forgot about it instead."

"His dark hair is grading at the temples, framing a face that would be called handsome if the word rugged or unconventionally were attached to it."

(Now I'm in love with this kind of mental visual, it's fun and it almost plays with your expectations. I just really like small things like these, they immediately make my reading extremely entertaining.)

"Someone in the corner is dressed as a highly recognizable author or, Zachary thinks as he gets a closer look, it might be that highly recognizable author."

(Again as before, this is the kind of writing I like. It plays with your imaginary visuals of what's happening and making them ten times more fun, especially when we confirm a bit later that that had indeed been that highly recognizable author.)

"He walks over bones he mistakes for dust and nothingness he mistakes for bones."

(Yet another example of those fun visuals, I didn't even realise how many of these I had marked until I had to go through them for this review. I just adore this writing style.)

I have so many more of these so here are just a few more to really make this review even longer:

"A portrait of a young man in a coat with a great many buttons but the buttons are all tiny clocks, from the collar to the cuffs, each reading different times."

"His face is so much more than hair and eye colour, she wonders why books do not describe the curves of noses or the length of the eyelashes. She studies the shape of his lips. Perhaps a face is too complicated to capture in words."

"There are dozens of giant statues. Some figures have animal heads and others have list their heads entirely. They are listed throughout the space in a way that looks so organic that Zachary would not be surprised if they moved, or perhaps they are moving, very, very slowly."

"The figure in the chair is carved from snow and ice. As her gown cascades down around the chair the ripples in the fabric become waves, and within waves there are ships and sailors and sea monsters and then the sea within her gown is lost in the drifting snow."

"Allegra watches him with studied interest from the other end of the table, the way one watches a tiger in a zoo or possibly the way the tiger watches the tourists."

"It sounds strange and empty now, in her head. Rhyme can hear the hum of the past stories though they are low and quiet, the stories always calm once they have been written down whether they are past stories or present stories or future stories.

(Probably one of my favourites, it really highlights everything I like about this style of writing.)

Another kind of writing style I noticed in the book was an abundance of making things literally feel alive, giving human emotions to objects, personification. I don't come across this too often in other books, and when it happens it isn't repeated as often in that same book,since it tends to get old, but as we have already learned Erin Morgenstern never makes this boring. She plays around with this and never seems to stop, adding another layer to her writing cake. I love how she gives these characteristics to even the smallest of crevices hidden in shadows, something just people wouldn't even think of.

"He takes his torch and explores the shadows, away from the doors and the tent, among jagged crystals and forgotten architecture. He carries the light into places long unfamiliar with illumination that accept it like a half-remembered dream."

"Outside the inn the wind howls, confused by this turn of events. (The wind does not like to be confused. Confusion ruins it's sense of direction and direction is everything to the wind.)"

"The wind howls after him as he leaves in fear of what is to come, but a mortal cannot understand the wishes of the wind no matter how loud it cries and so these final warnings go unheeded."

"If the sword could sigh with relief as it is taken from its scabbard it would, for it has been lost and found so many times before and it knows this time will be the last."

(I also got the feeling that the entire book is almost told through the perspective of the story, if that makes any sense whatsoever. It's almost like the story, that is bound together like the most complicated twister game, is alive and is smiling over our characters smugly waiting for everything to run its course. Like an omnipresent god, that's at least the vibe I got reading the book. )

The world building

There isn't that much to say except 'what the hell is going on?' in the best way possible, to the world building, because as confusing as it can be it's amazing to read and I think that it's one of my favourite aspects of the book.

The Characters

Now is time for the weakest part of the book, its characters, who even though I think are amazing, are definitely flatter than everything else in the book.

In my opinion most characters personalities I just can't pinpoint, and even though this personally doesn't take away from my enjoyment too much, I know a lot of people love well defined character personalities.

The most well developed personalities I could feel were Kat and the keeper, and at times Dorian. Zachary is a weird gray area for me, because even though I loved his character, I can't really tell who he is besides the son of the fortuneteller. I think that most of the character building was sacrificed to make the plot and the world feel alive. As I said before, it feels like the omnipresent god and the world is more developed than any of the characters personalities.

I usually love marking all 'character moments' where I feel like I can understand what kind of person the character is, their sense of humour, friendship, socializing, thinking and so on. But I found myself marking basically nothing of that kind in this book, just the beautiful descriptions of the world. The story was just more alive than the characters in it.

I liked all the romances even though they all lacked some depth, but the fairytale style writing of the romance definitely made them extremely enjoyable. If it weren't for the fairytale vibe all the romance would have been just flat, and I wouldn’t be invested at all.

The Conclusion

I wouldn't reccomend this book for everyone, as I think great many people wouldn't be fans of the writing, and so the lack of character depth wouldn't help either and there would be no good to outweigh the bad. I truly think this book is a perfect 4 starts but to me personally it is 5 stars. I am just such a big fan of the looping storyline, I still haven't gotten over that. To finish it all off here are a few extra quotes that I liked:

"No one takes responsibility. Everyone assumes someone else will do it, so no one does."

"It is critical to steep the tests in ignorance to result in uncorrupted responses."

"They all have similar elements, though. All stories do, no matter what form they take. Something was, and then something changed. Change is what a story is, after all."

#books #book review #the starless sea #erin morgenstern #book club #reading #bookblr #bookworm #quotes #goodreads

12 notes · View notes