He/she | Jason, Dimitri | Adolt | Bad blonde mothers guy | Reluctant Mothergate Believer | Stanning Mike isn't a choice. It's a lifestyle| Main is cum-villain | I write fanfic sometimes! Ao3 is just_a_dogboi but be warned I write mature fics for other fandoms
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Mike Wheeler + textposts (part 6)
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
i love remembering this exists
622 notes
·
View notes
Text
jason would have been a very valuable member of the group for killing vecna because he had all the motivation and rage and determination to avenge chrissy, if only he had the right information and knew who the real enemy was. his only problem was he was after the wrong guy. thanks for coming to my ted talk
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
I need them to have sibling moments and some happiness
399 notes
·
View notes
Text
I can't stop thinking about the parallel of Joyce Byers having a scholarship to go to theatre school, which was her dream since she was a child, but her putting it aside and not going because Lonny told her she'd never leave Hawkins and made her feel like she couldn't leave him behind.
And Jonathan Byers always dreaming of going to NYU to study since he was a child, but putting that aside and telling Nancy he would attend her dream college with her.
And, despite doing that, he still applies for a college close to Joyce, Will and El because he feels like he can't leave his family behind.
The Byers all deserve so much better. They've been made to feel inferior their whole lives, and they deserve some happiness.
73 notes
·
View notes
Note
hello?
0 notes
Text
#great person. her close interpersonal relationships are her fatal flaw though#i fear she could continue the cycle from ted if she doesnt realize how apathetic she is. but she's great outside that#reblog#poll#nancy
36 notes
·
View notes
Note
which would you rather have happen?
a) the season SUCKS but Byler is still endgame
b) the season is better than Season 1 and 2 combined but Byler isn’t endgame
#yall lost your minds i would want the good season#if they managed to find a convincing reason for byler to not be canon and have it be a good season i would be content#yall need to read/watch real bl fr fr#reblog#poll#byler tumblr
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
Something i will never understand is some bylers thinking that a scene where El calls Nancy pretty, where she sees her picture is about El being a lesbian. Imagine having such a shallow opinion and not understanding the entire point of this moment
Do bylers understand that El calling Nancy pretty wasn't about her being attracted to her? It was about El seeing a beautiful girl with a long hair who had everything El would want to have. El who was trapped and treated as a slave in a lab,who couldn't wear feminine clothes,but instead had to wear hospital gown. El who couldn't even have a long hair,but was forced to have a buzzcut saw a girl who was a complete opposite of her. So yeah, El called her pretty cause El herself wanted to be pretty like her. It was probably the first time El even saw a young normal girl like Nancy. Why do you think El starts screaming when she sees her refelection in the mirror cause she's dirty and her blonde wig is destroyed so she has to reveal her buzzcut again. Why do you think she's sad when she looks herself in the mirror at Wheelers house and asks Mike if she's still pretty? Cause El wants to be pretty herself,she wants to be pretty like Nancy and all other girls and women who had a chance to have a normal life while she didn't.
140 notes
·
View notes
Text
i don't think people understand how insanely disgusting it is to see multiple people post "rumors" of noah sexually assaulting male actors (caleb, finn, gaten, etc.) on the set of stranger things — which btw i'm not gonna even bother showing screenshots of the rumors, because it's legitimately sickening. these rumors are getting thousands of likes on social media (i've seen one with 400k likes), with people in the comments either wholeheartedly believing in them, or knowing that it's fake but pretending it's real anyway, because apparently making fake rape allegations is just a game to them. this is literally feeding into the stereotype of gay people being predatory towards other men. and the fact that people are 100% eating this shit up or having fun with it just because "noah is EVIL!!!1!!11!!1" is abhorrent. it's straight-up homophobic, and yet, these people will somehow find a way to justify their repulsive behavior.
123 notes
·
View notes
Text
read whatever you want, write whatever you want, imagine whatever you gd want. im not interested in moral high grounds, giving shifty "hmm pedo watch!" eye to anyone exploring sexual themes in media esp in fucking fandom fanfiction of all things, and deciding what's too explicit and what's Actually™ good and acceptable to write or talk about.
i have my standards for what i read and enjoy and those things absolutely include M and E rated fics, even when written about characters like mike and will who are, at current, canonically 14/15-year-olds. i enjoy fics in all sorts of genres and subject matter, and for some i enjoy them when aged-up (implied and explicit). have your thoughts, i know my business.
i'm not gonna automatically assume everyone else is getting off to the idea of real kids just because they read an E fic for that same ship. readers could be teens themselves or writing for themselves, and i'll have no way of knowing. just because someone somewhere was adamant that they got off to fanfic about two characters in a story when they were 11 does not mean everyone who writes about them gets the shifty eye. also the assumption that everyone reading/writing explicit fics or having sexual headcanons only because they're horny/horny for the characters (tho like, do you, boo) is wild. have you BEEN IN FANDOM?? i can't know everyone's mind and heart, and it's none of mine or anyone's fucking business to traffic control how and who gets to figure out a dynamic or get off to it or explore some deep seated trauma or just have fun.
characters are not actors, characters are not people, characters are not real. they are vehicles to explore ideas and emotions and situations for yourself and your audience. you can use your imagination to make them exist in any which way, shape or form, or yes even age them up, beyond canon. they are not any certain age because they're not real. you can make them as old as you fucking want them to be. again, these are things for you to decide. my opinion is irrelevant.
sex is a often a big part of a relationship and these are fucking fandom ships we're talking about. you are not automatically creepy and unreasonable for wondering and coming up with your own ideas about what those dynamics might be. people can laugh at them if they want, sure, but you're not automatically these things. same as you're not insane for imagining what careers they might like or what kind of house they might live in when they're adults. it is the same to me as figuring out who likes cuddles more and who holds whose hand first. THEY AREN'T REAL PEOPLE, its not a fucking violation or a transgression to suppose about them, regardless of how vague or detailed you decide to get. there is no "correct" way to handle the characters until a point of "until" or "unless" in the canon material that gives the go ahead. you are making fanworks, you do not need to strictly adhere to the source or genre. that's ridiculous. if you can only think of characters within the context of what you can see on your screen, that's not everyone else's problem.
the claims that critiques of this are all just critiques and personal preferences stop being just that when i get messages *warning* me about *questionable* mutuals—who haven't done a damn thing for me to blink at. fiction is fiction and to act like this is The Normal Website where very specific media/characters/ships don't put you in a chokehold and possess you for who knows how many years is wild to me.
no one has to like teen sex in media OR the discussion and hcs of it for underage characters. there's a lot of things that would make me pause in fanworks and i'm sure some could make me hurl. but my line is drawn at the generalization and suggestion that explicit hc or writing in fiction is automatically sexualizing fictional OR real teens, or at anyone being on the receiving end of pedophile jokes, implications, or accusations without substantial reasoning for it.
'well maybe i'm just built different'—CONGRATS!!! welcome to baby's first fandom! oh, it's NOT your first one? then why are you still acting like it. call me when actual Real Life Kids are in danger In Real Life—or fucking DON'T because if there was an actual problem happening, the law would be involved, not tumblr blogs.
all that's said above is my bottom line. i've heard the arguments (they've not been addressed here). i've seen the points (they simply do not connect). i used to have tons of rules for how to be "correct" about this stuff. i've had months and years and reasons to ponder this and weigh my own opinion. if you think the hosegate nonsense and witch-hunting was only about analyzing media and not also about the very existence of teen sexuality in fiction (*joyful, life-affirming, healthy, queer* teen sexuality at that), idk what to say at this point. with bad faith actors, with anyone really—im done arguing.
tldr; read/write/talk about whatever you want in fiction. characters are not real. welcome to fandom 101.
#youre so real op#i may avoid explicit byler fics like the plague but i trust the people who like them to be reasonable more than i trust the people who#act holier than thou about it and harass people for liking certain fiction#reblog
76 notes
·
View notes
Text
@emblazons recently made an excellent point about Jonathan in S4 -- that there are lots of little hints suggesting he's not only been picking up on Will's queer-coding, but Mike's as well, and could be in the process of connecting the dots on Byler.
I'd like to add some more evidence to the pile, because while dual-meaning throwaway lines like the above are easy to dismiss as coincidences...
...it's harder to ignore the fact that the van scene is explicitly shown from Jonathan's POV.
You might be wondering how this tells us anything about Mike -- after all, Jonathan's observations here lead pretty directly to the pizzeria heart-to-heart, so surely this is just about the Byers brothers?
But as I've pointed out before, the pizzeria heart-to-heart was not in the original script, and was only added after they'd already filmed the van scene. [source]
So if a heartwarming affirmation of brotherly acceptance wasn't the reason for the van scene to be shown from Jonathan's POV... then why Jonathan POV?
Jonathan, amongst others, has been showering Will with love and acceptance since S1 -- but nobody has ever bothered to tell Mike that they're proud of him, and he's been spiraling into depression and comphet because of it.
In the van, Will came so close to breaking Mike out of that spiral by assuring him that he's valuable for being exactly who he is... but his own internalized homophobia sabotaged the whole thing and only served to shove Mike even further into the closet.
So isn't it interesting that the Duffers felt the need to spell it out for us that Jonathan was watching all of this go down?
326 notes
·
View notes
Note
Is Byler your favorite part of the show?
A) Yes, it’s always been
B) Yes, it wasn’t always, but it is now
C) No, it’s never been
D) No, it used to be, but it isn’t now
submissions are open:) send us an ask!
#nope#its a part of the show i like. but im mostly interested in wheeler family arc and especially mike's arc#which includes byler but#reblog#poll
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
Still thinking about how understanding what happened in the S3-S4 relational narratives requires you suspend the belief that the last two (soon to be 3) seasons of Stranger Things are designed to stand alone.
With S1 and S2, the seasons existed as standalone entities—S2 was a sequel yes, but it wasn't a direct narrative extension of the action that occurred in the season before. You could watch Season 2 with only a bit of context from the first season (one boy got kidnapped and taken by the monster into another dimension, the girl from the lab with the superpowers showed up and they worked together to save said boy, but then she disappeared and was presumed dead) and watch the second season with little issue.
Its not the same with Seasons 3-5. If anything...it helps when analyzing to imagine Seasons 3-5 as one "season" in the same way S1 and S2 exist as single entities; the Duffers have already confirmed its true for Seasons 4-5, but it gets a lot easier to follow arcs and action, particularly for the youngest characters, if you stop trying to find coherence in single-season stories and look at each season as three parts of a whole.
This is true across the board, but it's particularly true in the case of understanding Byler, both as individuals and a pairing (though the full buildup of their romantic arc will take us across all 5 seasons). Understanding why S3 feels like you just got dropped into nonsense with them specifically (after two seasons of Michael "I'm the only one who cares about Will" Wheeler and Will "I am central to the story even when I'm off screen" Byers) is because The Duffers took the risk of introducing a brand new set of conflicts to the youngest characters: namely, ongoing romantic relationships, personal identity crises and sexuality...only without resolving the conflict and action in the 8-9 episodes they usually do, which is why you feel frustrated by it.
Basically: Season Three was the season where we set up the relational problems that need to be fixed—we just have three entire seasons to work through them, which means its gonna look bad at the start and good as we work through the problem (over the course of a few seasons) to get to the solution.
forewarning: ferociously long post ahead (with headers for clarity)
Will’s Arc: A (Queer) Coming of Age
With Will, the problem re-introduced in S3 is that he feels different from his peers, and not just because he's gay; its because 1) he is in love with Mike in a way that is more genuine than we are being presented in the third season (that "sandbox" "puppy love" "break up and makeup" summer fling energy that S3 has) and 2) he is unwilling to step into the lie of "maturity" as its being presented in the story, aka giving up things like hanging out with his friends over focusing on relationships or giving up games (DnD in particular).
(sidebar: I wrote another analysis touching on the above here).
A lot of people I've met who watch the show casually say things like "it just seems like he's not able to grow up like his friends" and even "he's falling behind," but I think that's on the right track while missing the point: the reason Will is written as "refusing to grow up" is because he is the character that represents the rebellion of The Duffer's heart and interests, and both of the things that seem like they would be a bad because they make his character different in the narrative are actually surprisingly positive for his "three season" arc...if you understand what the ongoing themes of Stranger Things are.
With Will, the “problem” in the story exists because he is the one who represents being weird/the outcast/queer and not giving into the social pressure to “let go” of that—he loves another boy, is more emotional than his peers and loves nerdy things like his tabletop board game and refuses to deny that to himself, no matter how brutalizing that is for him and his feelings. In that way, he is the character who “represents” the sentiment of The Duffers themselves—he is a nerd, a child at heart, and he has no problem taking DnD and anything else into “adulthood,” (looking at you “yeah, yeah I really did” during the rain fight) the same way The Duffers have.
That said: as we move into season 4, Will is presented with an evolution of this conflict—he wants to continue to be honest with and about himself, his feelings, and his interests…but it comes in direct conflict with his understanding of his peers & Mike, whom he loves.
We see this conflict show up repeatedly in Will’s actions in S4, especially in regards to the painting, which is the physical representation of both his love of Mike and his embracing of his nerdiness. Will shows up to the airport with his painting in spite of not speaking to Mike because his heart is to be honest and true-to-self regardless of anyone else—you even see this as he takes the painting on the road when they plan on going back to Hawkins, after he makes up with Mike. The problem is though (and this plays into the whole “we want you to feel like you lost” sentiment The Duffers spoke about, as S4 is the “down” before the “up”resolution of the whole narrative) that Will he realizes that his desire to be honest is getting in the way of (his perception of) the happiness of the people he loves, so he decides to betray his character and break the first cardinal rule of The Party…to tell his first lie.
There are plenty of phenomenal analyses on other aspects of Will’s connection to Vecna/the UD and the love triangle dynamic at play across this app so I’ll leave that alone here (I do have many thoughts on why the above makes Henry Creel the perfect villain foil to Will specifically), but: for the sake of understanding Will’s relational narrative arc, it’s critical to understand that our “low” for him is the betrayal of his ongoing S3 character—and that him undermining his self-honesty, nerdiness and love for Mike are the things that The Duffers have set themselves up to resolve in S5.
The resolution for Will is to re-embrace his differences —to realize that lying to yourself and other people about who you are and what you love (both in terms of “nerdy” interests and his queerness) is not who he wants to be, no matter how hard it is to stand up for in the wake of adversity—along with embracing the power of real love, which is also an ongoing theme the Duffers have set up in their relationships beginning in Season 3.
Now…on to Michael.
Mike’s Arc: Finding Yourself & Embracing What Makes You Different
—anyone with a single toe in this fandom knows that Mike Wheeler is one of the most divisive characters in this story when it comes to deciding 1) what his motivations are and 2) what his desires will be, but (and bare with me on this)…I think that’s kind of the point of his story. Mike’s “three season” arc is about him moving through a confusion of identity into someone who can embrace himself while addressing the things he is most insecure about—namely; being seen, being useful, and (very, very likely) the fact that the person who makes him feel most secure, seen, useful and loved is another boy.
There are several context clues that give credence to the fact that the reason Mike feels so wishy-washy / lacking in depth is because his struggle is not knowing how to find his place in the world, though you have to go further back than S3 to find them. Let me explain.
From the literal pitch of the show, there has always been an undercurrent of self-doubt and insecurity in Mike; his desire to escape the weight of feeling insecure has been a driving factor in his actions since before he was even on the screen, and it is impossible to understand what motivates him without first understanding that.
With Mike, his actions across all seasons have been weighed down by his desire to escape his insecurities through action—and as he’s gotten older, what he’s used to escape those insecurities (to be someone like the paladin he plays in DnD) has evolved and shifted, ranging through everything from turning the world (no pun intended) upside down to find Will; being willing to sacrifice his life to save Dustin from bullies; using any weapon he could find to fight a baby demogorgon; and wanting to be a heroic knight who protects the perceived vulnerable girl once he starts dating Eleven.
The point is: Mike’s deepest core need is to assuage his insecurities by doing whatever he can to be a good person—and when he feels like can’t do anything or protect the people he loves…he spirals. That’s been true since the start of his character…and everyone from The Duffers to Finn Wolfhard himself has mentioned it.
Now. With that baseline established, let’s talk Season 3.
Ironically enough, a lot of people feel like Mike’s character has “fallen off” because he, by the sake of all appearances, has achieved all the things he is supposed to want—namely a girlfriend, which (at least in his mind) is the physical embodiment of successfully “addressing” his core fears.
Because Mike has all the external markings of a well-adjusted kid—he comes from a wealthy family, has a solid group of friends (who are also mostly now striving for social normalcy) and even a girlfriend—he seems to have addressed what many people even in real life believe is the end of most arcs & the fulfillment of the fantasy. For Mike, the appearance of his S3 life seems to have assuaged the fears at the root of several of his insecurities, including the desire to be needed, the desire to protect, the desire to be useful, and the desire for acceptance…all because now he’s saved El and has her at his side, and having a girlfriend means he has everything a good, well-adjusted guy is supposed to want.
Or…does it?
With how The Duffers set up the story (with S3 as the introduction of a new conflict for every major character), the answer they’re giving you based on how Mike interacts with other characters is no—having a girlfriend and acting “mature” doesn’t solve anything, especially if the core problem of you having an insecure identity while being dishonest with yourself isn’t addressed…and it’s the arc of Mike learning that “lesson” that we find ourselves dropped into moving into Season 3.
Beginning in S3, the war on Mike’s insecure self-concept comes at him on two fronts: on the one side, El, who started her journey needing Mike because of her background but now has no real need for any of the things he so desperately wants to provide as a means to validate himself, and on the other Will, whose deep familiarity and history with Mike combined with his confidence in his own identity presents Mike with a challenge of self-reflection that he doesn’t exactly feel ready for yet.
(sidebar: my post on how Mike's arc is intrinsically tied to a subversion of the "Born Sexy Yesterday" trope is a helpful expansion on things I talk about here).
We see this in how Mike gets frustrated with Max for giving El the space and language to not need him (undermining his role in her life as someone who she needs to protect/guide her); we see it in how he says cruel things when Will behaves in a way that challenges the actions Mike has taken to be “mature” (how he insults Will for not also wanting a girlfriend / still wanting to play the games that set them apart as nerds/different); and we see it in how Mike still goes out of his way to fix those relationships in the best way he can—because he knows on some level that what he’s doing in several moments isn’t in alignment with who he wants to be, even though they are both presenting him with radical internal challenges.
Ironically enough, Dustin does a great job of summarizing the two sides of Mike's internal conundrum in what he says to Steve about Robin—Mike, somewhat like Steve, is struggling between what is socially acceptable in a partner (or "cool") and what he actually wants and enjoys in one—and as El and Will evolve, so does Mike's internal conflict about how he perceives their places in his world.
Between El’s supernatural abilities and rapidly growing autonomy making him obsolete to her in all the areas that matter to Mike (see: the ability to protect, be useful, and be seen) and Will’s reminding him that at his core he is just as much of a nerd as Will is, Mike finds himself feeling more confused and insecure than ever…and that is the internal conflict we see him end S3 battling.
The evolution of Mike’s narrative arc past the introduction of this internal conflict doesn’t happen until is the Byers/Hopper move to Lenora though…when he is literally left alone to process what that intense summer brought to light for him—which is the note we're left on as we move into the next phase of Mike's evolution in S4.
In S4, the development of Mike figuring out what he wants and needs from his relationships + the kind of person he wants to be becomes a lot more external—we see him going through a series of code switches as he tries to manage the ever changing landscape of his self-perception, where has started journey toward self-acceptance but is still insecure about following through with it.
We see this in the way he has now joined The Hellfire Club and shows sincere signs of accepting his interests and "outcast" status, but still looks forlorn when Lucas says “I’m tired of being bullied / I thought you wanted things to be different too” (Lucas’ struggles with some aspects of performing normalcy the way Mike does S4).
We see it in the way he shows up to Lenora dressed in what he thinks he’s should be wearing rather than as himself / the way he continues performing his relationship with El throughout that first day (and how he says it was Will who "sabotaged" things by being that same kind of radical honest about his feelings we talked about before)...only for the events of the day to spur him into meaningful honesty with both El and Will (to varying degrees of success) mere hours later.
We even see it in the way Mike seemed to have been “turning over a new leaf” once he and El fought, to the point he was okay with them ending the “normalcy” performance of their romance…right up until Argyle’s paranoia while burying Unknown Hero Agent Man struck the fear of god back into him (aka making him worry he was letting El down by not protecting her—aka tapping into one of his core fears).
Basically: Mike is leaning into accepting the things that make him different in little ways, but is still struggling to step into that identity fully—aka he is still using perceived social acceptability as a shield, even though he no longer holds as tightly to being perceived as normal. (Even Finn himself often jokes about Mike “just trying to be normal,” which I think is a good, simple explanation of what’s happening—that said, if we take that reading and combine it with those “narrative goals” I mentioned The Duffers have earlier…Mike trying to be normal is an issue to be resolved, not an identity to be embraced. But…let’s move on).
By the time we get to the infamous van scene, we’ve watched Mike struggle through the two sides of his inner conflict for the entire season now, and felt him very gently succeed at switching into a more honest version of himself (who doesn’t need a girlfriend as a shield / can embrace his “otherness” in the same way Will does) right up until his inherent desires to be needed and useful come rearing up the second El is in danger.
It’s why we see him look pleased (but also marred with conflict) when Will looks confident, happy and radiant talking about “playing dnd and Nintendo for the rest of their lives…” and why him being honest in that scene is actually a huge moment for him, because rather than being vague about what has been plaguing him for two seasons now (trying to be “normal” just because he feels insecure) Mike is finally verbalizing the internal conundrum of his now two seasons of looking critically at his insecurities.
Now—I could spend all day digging into just that bit of narrative alone—the way Mike finally externalizing his insecurities to be processed with Will rather than acting on them and hurting people unintentionally is a giant leap for him, and how when Will says “you’re sacred of losing her” Mike’s nod is an acknowledgement that Will is right…but his face is saying there’s more to that fear than he’s acknowledging—
—but for the sake of this analysis of the narrative arcs, the van scene is most important because it’s when the S4 “it feels like you lost” moment begins for Mike…and that’s because it matches up directly with the “you feel like you lost” moment for Will: him lying about the painting.
When Will lies about the painting—saying that his feelings and the art that (as I said before) represents 1) his love of Mike, 2) his embracing of his nerdiness and 3) that radial self-honestly Mike so admires Will for—it throws a wrench into Mike’s internal revelations because Will is essentially saying that the relationship that Mike was slowly realizing he used to assuage his insecurities (his relationship with Eleven) is actually what lines up best with "who he wants to be," which throws Mike’s slow growth toward Will + honesty about what (and who) he wants to be into a tail spin.
From Will’s lie onward, Mike is thrown into moment after moment of conflicting emotions and dire circumstances as well—and given that Mike's deep terror of losing people comes up strongest when the people he loves are in danger, it’s only downhill for Mike’s growth toward self actualization from here. In that sense, (much Jonathan's S4 omissions of his truths/fears to Nancy leading to Nancy's regression into complacency / social conformity with Steve), its Will's lie that leads us directly into the “you feel like you lost” moment for Mike: him moving back into "conforming" territory and confessing his love to El in the SBP.
The monologue (at least in terms of the narrative arc The Duffers are writing) is Mike’s “losing” moment because it’s when he has enough self-revelation to realize that being with a girl as a shield for his insecurities is no longer what he wants...but the drive he has to be useful, protect and love any way he can (on top of Will’s urging + lie) leave him feeling like his only option is stepping into the person he was at the start of S3.
In this moment, we see Mike say exactly what someone who is "acting normal” about loving his girlfriend and wanting to save her would….even though romantic love with El (and the socially-acceptable romantic relationship he has with her) are not what he really wants, and what we will watch crumble moving into S5.
Essentially: Mike having a moment of dissonance of that magnitude after an entire season of looking toward Will was what set us up to see all those "external markings of normalcy" Mike has held onto and had started grating against for two seasons now fall apart, given what we know about those core messages/themes/child-at-heart values the Duffers hold and keep at the heart of their show.
As of the end of S4, we can already see how this "regression" into his old self is not going to hold—the fact that everything Mike did to save El is rooted 1) in a lie and 2) not in alignment with Mike evolving understanding of his core desires makes sure of that.
We even see the beginnings of this "low" being resolved in Mike's arc in how Mike & El are not speaking (even with the 'resolution' of their surface-level S4 conflict with Mike's love confession) and how Mike is glued to Will's side even before Vecna is mentioned–which is how we've been set up to see the resolution of Mike's arc in S5.
With all this in mind, it becomes a bit clearer that the resolution of Mike's arc is him moving through the confusion of identity we've watched him go through from S3 forward and into someone who can embrace who he is what he truly loves without fear of going against what is expected—aka finding the courage not to conform.
Mike as a character is a lesson in how doing what you think you're supposed to (aka what is "normal") is often at odds with who you are and what makes you the happiest—and the only way to self-actualize is to move past your insecurities and into someone who can be confident embracing what (and who) they really want...even when it means stepping out of line from what you’ve grown up believing would do the self-actualizing for you.
Final Thoughts
Both Mike and Will's relational arcs revolve around an embracing of what makes them different—in terms of their (highly likely) mutual queerness, yes, but also in terms of them making self-actualized peace with being nerdy "children at heart" in much the same way The Duffer Brothers themselves are.
If Will represents a person who struggles because they refuse to deny themselves their identity, Mike represents a person who struggles because they don’t understand their identity, and are walking around just trying to do whatever they can to get along (because they haven’t been presented with the inciting conflict that will move them into self-revelation & growth).
Both of these internal conflicts are narrative arcs that have been built into the coming of age stories of both halves of Byler—and though we are currently sitting at the "low" of both of their arcs as of the end of Season 4, the setup and though-line for them finding themselves (and real, honest love with each other) has been clearly set up for exploration in Season 5.
—if you managed to get through all of this, I commend you. And yes, there are a million other things to be explored between these two, but...I enjoy sorting through the thematic / "moral of the story" through-lines in all my media, so of course I was gonna do it for for Byler!
359 notes
·
View notes