maiesiophilicmonster

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Pixiv create a blacklist challenge (IMPOSSIBLE!!!) (100% WILL FAIL) [GET FUCKED]

[maiesiophilicmonster]

This contact stance slaps /pos I would love to use it, but i fear people may misunderstand it

Hazard Consent

[pt: Hazard Consent /end pt]

Hazard consent, or hazard-consent, is a contact/consent stance based on harm reduction, explicit and informed consent, and understanding the repercussions of one's actions. It is inherently against contact for any paraphilia, kink or fetish that involves a lack of, or otherwise dubious, content- *as well as situations where even if one believes a group or individual can consent, the negative impact it would have on either party outweigh what pleasure they could get out of it.

What is hazard consent FOR?

explicit and informed consent

harm reduction and understanding the difference between hurt and harm(link)

non-offending or recovering offenders, those with paraphilic disorders, moral OCD and intrusive thoughts, and those who want to have or participate in harmless contact

acceptance of every paraphilia, kink and fetish, and form a sense of community

fighting against ableism and sanism targeted at those with paraphilias, kinks, fetishes and other atypical interests, as well as destigmatizing them

engaging with paraphilias, kinks and fetishes with full knowledge of any risk involved and doing so as safely as possible

What is hazard consent AGAINST?

sexual or romantic contact with children, animals, or non/dubiously consenting adults, or exposing them to sexual or explicit content

contact for pedophilia, zoophilia, biasophilia, incestophilia and non-consenting necrophilia, somnophilia, inibriphilia(link), or anything else that can be pre-consented to. roleplay for any of these does not fall under hazard consent

attaching any inherent morality to any parahilia, fetish or kink, even if one personally think its "gross", "weird" or "immoral"

harassment, bullying, doxxing, abusing or otherwise unnecessarily cruel behavior to anyone of any stance

ableism and sanism

What does NOT fall under hazard consent?

when topics such as consent or boundaries are discussed beforehand, and can be revoked at any time (pre-consented to necro, somno, inibri, etc.)

risk aware consensual kink & BDSM

engaging in consensual roleplay, including CNC

engaging with objects or non-sentient creatures (plants, robots, etc)

anything not explicitly stated on the post

Hazard Stances

[pt: Hazard Stances /end pt]

One can express their stance on hazard consent through the typical "pro/neutral/complex/anti" system that is used for other stances. Ex. pro-hazard supporting hazard consent, or anti-hazard being against hazard consent. Anyone can be any stance for any reason, and is at their own discretion to explain why. Nobody owes anybody an explanation.

QnA

[pt: QnA /end pt]

QnA section to get ahead of any potential questions, and clarifying anything that might not have already been made clear.

Q. Why does this exist?

A. Historically, contact stances were something used in the MAP community to express one's personal stance on contact with minors, but now that it is used to indicate one's stance on multiple/all paraphilias, it has become unclear what falls under being "pro/neutral/complex/anti-contact". Meanwhile stances like "pro-consent" or "anti-harm" have a similar vagueness to them, as what counts as "consent" or "harm" can be subjective and up to the user. This is to serve a clear and explicit stance of things that often seems to be shared between these beliefs.

Q. *What does this mean?

A. This stance believes that, even if an individual thinks groups like children or animals can consent, the negative impact sexual contact with them has on these groups psychologically outweighs the pleasure gained. This also means that if an individual is distressed by their attraction, they shouldn't engage with it if/until they can do so without harming themselves mentally.

Q. What is dubious consent in this context?

A. Any coerced, unenthusiastic, uninformed or otherwise unclear consent.

Q. Why the name "hazard consent"?

A. "Hazard" is supposed to reference the understanding of the risks, potential danger, and, well, hazards associated with non/dubious consent, as well as those related to informed consent. It also is intended to invoke a sense of danger. It is intended to promote a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits associated with sex, consent and paraphilias, kinks and fetishes.

Q. Who can use hazard consent?

A. Anyone. Even if someone disagrees with me and my beliefs, or if I disagree with them. This is a term for anyone and everyone who shares this specific belief, and anyone can be any stance on it.

Any other questions, concerns or thoughts can be sent to @hazard-consent

[maiesiophilicmonster]

SHIT! I accidentally reblogged a political post on this blog. I apologize for the inconvenient.

[maiesiophilicmonster]

people on here r rly like 'attraction to big people is fetishistic, attraction to small people is pedophilic, having sexual thoughts about a real person is objectifying and basically harassment (and having them about fictional people is perverted), kinky sex is immoral, if youre open about your sex life in any way youre a pervert, if youre not open about them you are queerbaiting. basically you should be completely sexless while everything you do is sexualized and up for debate/speculation. this is good for the lgbt community'

[maiesiophilicmonster]

*announcer voice* And now, we’ll hear a few words from our sponsors!

The Sponsor:

[maiesiophilicmonster]

"Damn, i wanna wank"

Reads and reblogs posts about Palestine while feeling like shit

"I really wanna wank"

Reads and reblogs posts about Palestine while feeling like shit

"What should i wank to?"

Reads and reblogs posts about Palestine while feeling like shit

"STOP TALKING ABOUT PALESTINE FOR FUCK'S SAKE!"

Reads and reblogs posts about Pa-

Can you tell i feel like shit?

And for once, the blame isn't solely on our OCD. Solely.

I know this isn't about maiesiophilia at all, but i mentioned a sexual activity, so i thought it wouldn't be fit for my main "sfw" blog.

Anyways, not gonna tag this shitfest of a rant with any political tag, but Free Palestine nonetheless 🇵🇸

[maiesiophilicmonster]

I theorize the reason "bottoms" appear more prevalent than "tops" on these types of spaces is that it is simply easier to be funny about being a bottom than about being a top without sounding like a sex offender

"uuuuu 🥺 pls cock me aaaaaaaa *runs into wall like Wile E Coyote running into his own tunnel painting*" easy as shit comedy

"I want to put my DICK in someone" whoa dude calm down, take it easy

[maiesiophilicmonster]

I'd argue that no paraphilia is inherently harmful just by existing, even the scary ones, and that the ACTIONS that can follow it are the ones that are actually harmful.

(TW for mentions of CSA and pedophilia)

Like, a person with pedophilic disorder isn't inherently a monster just by virtue of their disorder, while a non-pedophilic uncle who still assaults his niece IS absolutely despicable.

Judging a person solely by its paraphilia borders on being saneist

Objectum culture is often not wanting to associate with the label because people keep arguing that objectum, as a community, is always sfw and the "nsfw side is just vocal/makes us look bad" thus making my exclusive sexual attraction to objects feel dirty and wrong.

I keep having to log off of Twitter because people keep saying "every single paraphile is terrible" and other gross stuff... and refuse to listen to people who have paraphilias that aren't harmful... so I totally understand. It's hard, but try to not let pick-me's get you down. They're not worth it ^-^

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Not something para-related, but i though it would be worth it to share here

Since they don’t teach gay sex ed in school let me tell gay guys and anyone else that wants to use the back door that douching is bad for you. It will cause long term problems.

Also starving yourself all day will not work because sometimes it can take up to two or three days for something to move through you.

Just eat a bunch of fiber and use the bathroom at least an hour or two before your booty call if you can. If you hate eating fiber just get yourself some fiber pills to take with meals. If you eat enough fiber the section after the colon should remain relatively clean on its own. Just wash the outside part. Not your insides. Those clean themselves.

Also if he shames you for anything that happens by accident in the bedroom and/or refuses to use a condom he’s a jerk-wad and an idiot and you should dump him.

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Another day, another piece of shit comparing paraphiles to child groomers.

I honestly wish ableists could feel a fraction of the shame stigmatized paraphiles feel everyday. Maybe then they'd shut the fuck up for good, whatcha say?

[maiesiophilicmonster]

You know how a pretty obvious majority of kinksters are submissives? You want to know a big part of the reason why it's hard to find a dom that's into the same hard kink you are?

Ask a hardcore masochist what they think of being whipped.

Then ask a hard sadist what they think of whipping someone.

Do you notice that the sadist/dom will often either dance around an answer or try to use soothing language/euphemism not unlike the way how in many places people are still expected to discuss sex if at all. Gentle, calculated language.

The issue is, especially with a new surge of purity culture overtaking so-called "leftist" online circles, is that fantasy becomes a moral judgement.

Sub with a noncon kink: "I want to be raped" (cnc but like. People can talk ab it how they want don't cancel me fr.)

Response from Normies: "well that's weird and kinda dark but ok"

Dom with a noncon kink: "I want to rape"

Response from Normies: "I'm calling the police and you should kys and you're also a sexual abuser and even though you haven't said anything about kids you're also also a pedophile :)"

Not only does the attitude of murderous hatred against doms/tops with hard kinks/fetishes/paraphilias make it difficult for them to practice those kinks (safely and ethically) out of fear of social backlash if it's ever found out even if both they and their partner[s] had a great time and are fine-- but, it actively puts innocent people in danger by equating thoughts and attractions of ANY KIND to the act of hurting others against their will. It equates fantasy, which can oftentimes be played out safely if in a modified way with real harmful actions.

Also, kink is still illegal in many places, so don't "its illegal" me about harder kinks. Law is not morality, none of us are free until all of us are free, etc. You get the gist.

You want to see more doms? Meet someone who can indulge your "scary badwrong" sexy feelings? Then maybe don't actively promote a culture where you put ANY kind of attraction or kink under fire. It doesn't matter if it'd be unethical to act out in real life. Some of the most common kinks worldwide are unethical as fuck to act out irl, including rape. That's why we have cnc, come on, guys.

You know what? In fact, you SHOULD actively shun people who shame others for their sexual feelings. EVEN if you think it's gross. EVEN if it wouldn't be ethical to act on irl. Let these types know that their puritan ideals are NOT accepted here. Let them know that if they want to go to church they can do that but not in your space, not forcing other (non consenting!) people to listen to their hateful and repressive ideology.

Like, hey, I'm not into ABDL, for example. But I will defend to the death other people's right to be into that. To think and feel whatever they think and feel. You think diapers are sexy? Great! I don't personally see the appeal, but you do you boo. There is no Correct Way to be sex/kink negative. Either you believe in thought crime or you don't.

And yes, this post includes "harmful" paraphilias (I put it in quotes because they're only harmful if acted on), sadomasochism, mutilation fetishism, etc etc. Every "gross" or "evil" kink, fetish, para you can possibly imagine. The stuff that makes you horny is just stuff that makes you horny, and being horny is normal. Being "weird horny" is also normal. No one deserves to experience shame, let alone public harassment or hate over feelings they most of the time don't Choose to have. Be mindful of puritan rhetoric and strike it down when you see it.

[maiesiophilicmonster]

I'm bored, so... Intro time :D HI! I'm Asia/Marco, and i'm a maiesiophile (duh); I made this blog to talk more openly about my paraphilia, since some of my followers on my main blog, @queermetalgremlin , are minors, and i don't wanna expose random teens to my horny, distressed or mad ramblings. As such, this blog is for bodily 18+ folks only. Also, stay away from this blog if you're in a regressed mental state, and please keep away your syskids/systeens from here; nothing wrong with y'all, but this is a mature blog, and i'm not exposing y'all to things that could put you in harm's way. I'm pro-para (of course) but anti-contact for non-con ones, anti-forced recovery (but generally pro-recovery), neutral on trans-IDs (although i'd personally punch transnazis, as they are nazis), neutralship (sometimes i lean closer to pro, other times closer to anti) and anti-harassment. I'm part of a system (the host, specifically), and we're bodily Neurodivergent (Autism, OCD) and White. We're also Endogenic (Traumaendo maybe? Or fully Traumagenic? I dunno, either way we're vehemently pro-Endo) and Radinclus (NOT Radqueer, although i don't personally hate them or anything). Will i ever share fetish content? Eeeeeeeeh... i don't think so, since this is supposed to be a confessional space, not something to wank to, but i won't exclude it. I won't be able to comment under people's posts though, since this is a sideblog, and i don't wanna see people harassing me on our main for the HEINOUS (/s) crime of being a paraphile. Will i ever coin terms? Sure, why not? Even though i do have a coining/MOGAI sideblog ( @howtofailatmogai coff coff /hj ), that space is strictly SFW, meanwhile this is the Land of Depravity (/j), so i think i'll only coin paraphilia-related terms on here. Enjoy :D !

[maiesiophilicmonster]

I haaaaaaate my para sometimes; why do i have to get anxious, violent and horny at the mere mention of labor?

WHY?

I mean, i know why, it's 'cause of a possible trauma, but still, it sucks.

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Man, i used to be a dick to non-con paraphiles, mainly 'cause i didn't get what terms meant as well as wanting to fit in with MOGAI blogs.

I've heard that part of growing up is being apalled at your old self. I like to believe that's true.

Anyways sending love to anti-contact non-con paraphiles, keep rocking on :D

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Reminder that pro-para sentiments do not harm survivors, pro-para sentiments do not "glorify abuse", and pro-para sentiments ARE helpful for those with OCD and intrusive thoughts.

Your thoughts do NOT make you a bad person, your attractions do NOT make you inherently abusive. And yes this does include scary things like MAPs, zoos, and more.

[ i am anti-c. please respect that & dni if you are pro-c or supportive. ]

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Gotta do a scatter shot of para positivity to keep the anti-paras away ;3

I love you bodily secretion paras

I love you plushophilia paras

I love you objectophilia paras

I love you food/drink paras

I love you hemophilia paras

I love you anti-contact harmful paras

I love you minor paras

I love you romantic/nonsexual paras

I love you adult paras

I love you paras who are shunned by others

This post is not for those who are pro-c for harmful paras or radqueers /srs

[This post is not for those who are pro-c for harmful paras or radqueers /srs]

[maiesiophilicmonster]

Dear hentai taggers, If i see the "abortion" tag under a snuff piece one more time i'm gonna burn hentai websites to the ground. It's sad to see people unknownignly pander to the right-wing idea that abortion is murder, even in supposedly open spaces like porn websites. I'm not shaming people who have this paraphilia (although i do hate the content, but we're not the target audience so i digress), but i AM shaming the comparison between abortion and snuff. Please, stop pandering to bigotry, and properly tag your shit. Yours truly,

An annoyed paraphile.