Contains lemons and Untamed/MDZS content. Also find me on Twitter as kanon_kita.
Last active 2 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
I honestly do just presume everyone in the world has watched naruto I just can't comprehend a person that hasn't witnessed rock Lee take off his training weights or seen naruto sit sadly on a swing 50 times so when I see someone say they've never seen naruto I just don't believe them they have definitely watched naruto it is a universal life step
#the problem is you asked about watching it#i only watched a wee bit#but i READ the manga faithfully until about 2012
28K notes
·
View notes
Text
What is a ‘wug’?
If you’ve been to linguist tumblr (lingblr), you might have stumbled upon this picture of a funny little bird or read the word ‘wug’ somewhere. But what exactly is a ‘wug’ and where does this come from?
The ‘wug’ is an imaginary creature designed for the so-called ‘wug test’ by Jean Berko Gleason. Here’s an illustration from her test:
“Gleason devised the Wug Test as part of her earliest research (1958), which used nonsense words to gauge children’s acquisition of morphological rules—for example, the “default” rule that most English plurals are formed by adding an /s/, /z/ or /ɨz/ sound depending on the final consonant, e.g., hat–hats, eye–eyes, witch–witches. A child is shown simple pictures of a fanciful creature or activity, with a nonsense name, and prompted to complete a statement about it:
This is a WUG. Now there is another one. There are two of them. There are two ________.
Each “target” word was a made-up (but plausible-sounding) pseudoword, so that the child cannot have heard it before. A child who knows that the plural of witch is witches may have heard and memorized that pair, but a child responding that the plural of wug (which the child presumably has never heard) is wugs (/wʌgz/, using the /z/ allomorph since “wug” ends in a voiced consonant) has apparently inferred (perhaps unconsciously) the basic rule for forming plurals.
The Wug Test also includes questions involving verb conjugations, possessives, and other common derivational morphemes such as the agentive -er (e.g. “A man who ‘zibs’ is a ________?”), and requested explanations of common compound words e.g. “Why is a birthday called a birthday?“ Other items included:
This is a dog with QUIRKS on him. He is all covered in QUIRKS. What kind of a dog is he? He is a ________ dog.
This is a man who knows how to SPOW. He is SPOWING. He did the same thing yesterday. What did he do yesterday? Yesterday he ________.
(The expected answers were QUIRKY and SPOWED.)
Gleason’s major finding was that even very young children are able to connect suitable endings—to produce plurals, past tenses, possessives, and other forms—to nonsense words they have never heard before, implying that they have internalized systematic aspects of the linguistic system which no one has necessarily tried to teach them. However, she also identified an earlier stage at which children can produce such forms for real words, but not yet for nonsense words—implying that children start by memorizing singular–plural pairs they hear spoken by others, then eventually extract rules and patterns from these examples which they apply to novel words.
The Wug Test was the first experimental proof that young children have extracted generalizable rules from the language around them, rather than simply memorizing words that they have heard, and it was almost immediately adapted for children speaking languages other than English, to bilingual children, and to children (and adults) with various impairments or from a variety of cultural backgrounds. Its conclusions are viewed as essential to the understanding of when and how children reach major language milestones, and its variations and progeny remain in use worldwide for studies on language acquisition. It is “almost universal” for textbooks in psycholinguistics and language acquisition to include assignments calling for the student to carry out a practical variation of the Wug Test paradigm. The ubiquity of discussion of the wug test has led to the wug being used as a mascot of sorts for linguists and linguistics students.”
Here are some more illustrations from the original wug test:
Sources:
Wikipedia, All Things Linguistic
#my brain thinks the plural of gutch should be gutchen#and that kazh would be noncountable like moose
17K notes
·
View notes
Text
me finding out my mutual is one inch taller than me
#i have been 5'3“ since i was 18#yesterday i went to the doctor and measured in at 5'4“#we checked it multiple times#no idea what happened#but i guess my back pain has been better lately....
143K notes
·
View notes
Text

28K notes
·
View notes
Text
Happy weed Easter! Blaze it if you got it. It's legal here. We are cool like that
154 notes
·
View notes
Text
ok but the way he's still kind of getting outcunted by the guy on the left

171K notes
·
View notes
Text
26K notes
·
View notes
Text
Most of them are about as attractive to the general public as a dung beetle, too.
this is how people on tumblr talk about men they like (x)
20K notes
·
View notes
Text
Alright have we decided which transformer would have a cybertruck alt mode yet?? I want it to be Sentinel because.... It's Sentinel. But I could see arguments for other candidates.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
y’all expose yourselves and take this fanfic test i was just forced to by an irl so now i’m making you too
#21#i had to see what 20 was#bruh thats just 90% of megastar#yeah they're stupid in love but stupid is the keyword#and theyre def not gonna forget last week's assassination attempt
48K notes
·
View notes
Text
#at least he'd wish everyone back when he was done proving it...#i wonder what kind of provisions people make in the dbz-verse for the quite likely event of being dead for a year
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Are we sure that the prank wasn't that there was no prank?
1 note
·
View note
Text
Having a really long-term hyperfixation that has since faded is terrifying yes but it's also so embarrassing. Hi I used to think about Scrimblo Splungus 25/7. Yeah, for 2 years straight. Nah, I don't think about them anymore except for with a vague sense of melancholy as I recall how they used to make me feel. Anyways this new one, Blimpkins McGee? I'm gonna think about them forever and the cycle will NOT repeat in 2 years. Trust me guys.
#whenever i see posts like this i wonder#if the person actually came from a fandom like mlp or transformers#where the character names honestly sound like that#never gets old talking to friends in a new fandom like#oh this reminds me of a fan concept we have about the lore surrounding unicron#he's a giant planet that eats other planets also the devil also possibly the center of the earth#and no one's listening cuz they still think you said unicorn#or yes my blorbo starscream#they almost called him ulchtar or something#everyone assumes we're just being very silly over here#we are but still#lol
58K notes
·
View notes
Text
I really need to write something about like... Pregnant robots or something. I just think it might help fix me.
1 note
·
View note