judeiscariot

[judeiscariot]

[judeiscariot]

[judeiscariot]

Fandom needs less representation for tops who are selfless and "just like helping their partners feel good and explore their desires" and more representation for tops who are embodying the Nine Inch Nails "Closer"/Depeche Mode "Soothe My Soul" vibes in terms of being a broken trembling husk of a person who is grounded and made whole and purified by someone else willingly absorbing the brute force of their need. That's just my opinion, man.

[judeiscariot]

EDVARD MUNCH— "WEEPING NUDE" | 1913-14 "WEEPING NUDE" | 1919 [oil on canvas (2) | V/D]

[judeiscariot]

IVE BEEN JERKING IT TO VAMPIRES, THEYRE CALLING ME BRAM STROKER

[judeiscariot]

The sun and moon. [Dandelions]

[judeiscariot]

should I get a masters or jump into a river and swim away forever. vote now

[judeiscariot]

Didn't pay my dark bill so the power company shut my lights on

[judeiscariot]

really really obsessed with this one

[judeiscariot]

The real question is whether he wears the flannel and camo jacket to the swingers club

[judeiscariot]

I work in a factory where they make oranges, i put the peels on. Everything youve ever been told is a lie. Heres a picture as proof..

[judeiscariot]

i love when horror movies have an installment thats like “the final chapter” “the last cut” “franchisename: its ending” and then theres like 4 more movies

[judeiscariot]

I feel like the common literacy advice to "read critically" is very daunting when you first start reading (especially in self study) non fiction or theory and you keep experiencing the common "agree with the last position you heard" problem. this problem persists for much longer than people like to think it does - how are you supposed to question opinions you hear if the thesis of every book you read is the first opinion you ever encountered on a topic? how do you know what to think when everyone tells you they're right? this is just my experience but for me the two things that helped the most were:

to read criticism; reviews of books, someone's 10 note tumblr post, essays that respond to those ideas, twitter threads, your friend who took a class one time, etc. simply put, the more you steal people's opinions, the more you can sharpen your own. this gave me an idea of what the stakes are, how to pick and choose useful and useless aspects of a text, and, metatextually, what kind of aspects of a text can be criticized, a scope that is much much bigger than I initially thought, and:

to focus on a single topic at first. it's seductive to want to read everything because of the way people write those theory essential reading lists but only reading one seminal book on each topic is not a way to develop your understanding. by starting with various books that deal with a specific topic that interests you (for me, 19th century french psychiatry) you can get a better sense of the various approaches to a topic, the way historians contradict and respond to each other, the difference between an academic book, a news article, an anonymous anarchist library essay, and a communist propaganda leaflet on the same topic, and most importantly: you realize, as you accumulate knowledge, that published writings are often wrong and false! and realising the scope of this helps you be more confident in doubting and questioning any piece of writing in a critical way.

[judeiscariot]

[judeiscariot]

[judeiscariot]

i think some of you dont like narratives or stories or characters i think you just like fanfiction tropes

[judeiscariot]

Access series by the Center for Land Use Interpretation.