Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Week 11: April 2: Sustainable Fashion: Innovators and Outliers in Fungi, Seaweed, Food Waste and Design
1. How does Fast Fashion impact you directly?
In today’s world, we’re constantly surrounded by fast fashion. Every time I scroll through social media, I see ads and influencers promoting endless new trends, it’s nonstop encouragement to overconsume. There is a pressure to keep up with the latest drops from popular stores. A few years ago, when Shein first started blowing up, I fell for it. The prices were insanely low, and the amount of clothes you could get felt almost too good to be true. And it was. When my order arrived, I was so disappointed. The clothes felt fake and unnatural, the quality was awful, and even the packaging felt overwhelmingly bad for the environment. I ended up sending everything back, but it made me wonder—do influencers even keep the clothes they promote? Or is it just for the views and a paycheck?
My capstone project is actually centered around social media influencers and overconsumption. It’s not just Shein—there are so many other shops clearly targeting our generation, knowing we’re hooked on shopping and trends. I’ve wasted way too much money on pieces that fall apart after just a few wears. It’s frustrating, but also eye-opening.
2. Which celebrity brands are doing the most to address sustainability? Which ones are greenwashing?
When I think of a brand genuinely committed to sustainability, Patagonia is the first that comes to mind. They’re known for ethical sourcing, using innovative materials, and being transparent about their practices. Their entire business model seems built around long-term environmental responsibility rather than just following trends.
On the other hand, brands like H&M feel more like they’re greenwashing with collections like the “Conscious Exclusive Collection.” While it’s great that they’re incorporating materials like organic cotton, recycled polyester, and Tencel, it doesn’t address the bigger issue—fast fashion itself. H&M’s business model is built on overproduction, frequent drops, and low prices, which directly contradict the values of sustainability. Even if one small collection uses better materials, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the environmental impact of the rest of their production.
3. What are your thoughts on the viability of the Bio-textiles mentioned in articles and video above?
I think the bio-textiles mentioned—like mushroom leather, spider silk, and shrimp shell fabric—are so cool! Learning about them reminded me of a class I took sophomore year that focused on sustainable materials. For my final project, I created a booklet exploring hemp’s potential in interior design. Seeing how far innovation has come in this space gives me a lot of hope for the future of design and sustainability.
That said, accessibility and cost still seem like the biggest hurdles. In “A Japanese startup is using biotech to ‘brew’ greener fashion,” Elizabeth Beattie points out that there’s a lack of investment in biotech companies, and the materials themselves are currently more expensive than traditional options. Because of this, they’re mostly limited to small, high-end collections aimed at a niche audience. For these materials to make a real difference, we need greater awareness, more funding, and broader industry support to make them affordable and accessible on a larger scale.
4. Choose Three Facts gleaned from this post and comment about your own practices with regard to fast fashion and sustainability.
Fact 1: “In the United States alone, over 25 million pounds of clothing end up in landfills or incinerators each year.”
That number is shocking—but sadly, not surprising. With the rise of fast fashion, so many clothes are made with poor-quality materials that fall apart quickly and can’t be resold or donated. I’ve started being more mindful about where I shop, choosing brands that prioritize quality so my clothes last longer. When I’m ready to part with something, I try to resell it on Depop or donate it if it’s still in good condition.
Fact 2: “Just one cotton t-shirt can take nearly 3,000 liters of water to produce.”
I’ve heard this stat before, and it still blows my mind. It really makes you think twice about how much waste is behind even the simplest items. That’s why I think it’s so important to raise awareness about alternative materials and rethink how much we actually need. We don’t need endless options—we need better ones.
Fact 3: “The best way to be more sustainable: choose quality pieces that will last a long time.”
This is something I’ve really been working on. Instead of buying trendy items on impulse, I’m trying to build a wardrobe of versatile, timeless staples. I’ve started checking fabric labels and paying more attention to fit and feel. I also track how often I wear each piece—it’s helped me realize what I actually love and wear, versus what just sits in my closet.
5. Include photos from your own sustainable clothing brands, thrift store shopping, dumpster sleuthing outside stores, etc. BE CREATIVE!

0 notes
Text
Week 11: Wed April 2: Documentaries and Social Change: Part Two
1. Film trailer and link to film's website.
youtube
2. What important social issue question does this documentary ask and what type of storytelling does it employ to answer it? (2 paragraphs)
The important social issue that Navalny asks is: what happens when someone dares to challenge a deeply corrupt authoritarian regime? The film explores the consequences of standing up to power in a country where any threat is often met with violence or death. It also reveals how easily the truth can be hidden behind propaganda, censorship, and fear.
The documentary tells this story through investigative storytelling. It follows Navalny in real time, showing his strategic thinking and refusal to back down despite multiple assassination attempts. Using interviews, real surveillance footage, and Navalny’s viral YouTube investigations, the film pieces together a thriller-like story.
3. What new story is revealed in this film, and what revelations have emerged from it to impact popular discourse? (2 paragraphs)
The film reveals a disturbing and largely hidden reality: the existence of a highly organized, state-run assassination program targeting political dissidents in Russia. During Navalny’s investigation, he gets one of his assassins to confess on a recorded call, uncovering that chemical weapons like novichok are still being manufactured and used under the guise of sports nutrition drink manufacturing.
This revelation sparked international outrage and amplified discussions about the extent of Putin’s power and the Russian government's use of fear to silence opposition. It also pushed conversations about digital surveillance and misinformation. Navalny’s case became symbolic for activists everywhere fighting regimes that prioritize control over truth.
4. What personal revelations did you glean from this film? What shocked or inspired you? How has this film changed your perspective on the subject? (1-2 paragraphs)
What shocked me most was how human Navalny comes across in the film. He isn’t just portrayed as a political figure, he’s also a husband, a father, a friend. He jokes, he laughs, and he shows real emotion, even while fully aware that he’s a target. So often, world leaders seem distant or power-hungry, but Navalny’s presence felt genuine and hopeful, especially for Russia. His decision to return to the country after being poisoned was unreal and it made me rethink what real bravery looks like in today’s world.
The film also made me reflect on how fragile freedom of speech and democracy can be. Living in a society where those rights are often taken for granted, it was eye-opening to see the lengths Navalny had to go to just to speak the truth. His refusal to be silenced by using humor, social media, and transparency was inspiring and a reminder of how powerful and necessary those tools can be in the fight against corruption.
5. How did this documentary expand the reputation of the subject, and how did it serve to further the spotlight on a key social change issue? (2 paragraphs)
The documentary not only humanized Navalny but also elevated him into a global symbol of resistance. Before the film, many people might have seen him as just another Russian politician. But through this documentary viewers gain a deeper understanding of his intellect, character, and the very real risks he takes for his beliefs. It made clear that his story isn’t just about politics, it’s about standing up for truth.
In doing so, the film also intensified focus on the dangers of authoritarianism and state-sponsored violence. It highlighted how modern tools, like social media and data leaks, can be used to expose truth and mobilize people. The documentary didn’t just inform viewers, it also urged them to care, to question power, and to recognize how corruption can erode justice when left unchecked.
6. Did the film prove pivotal for the director/producers' careers? Were they historic for expanded gender and racial representation in storytelling? (1 paragraph)
Yes, Navalny marked a major moment for the filmmakers. It demonstrated how documentary storytelling can be just as thrilling and moving as fiction. Director Daniel Roher’s work gained international attention and he earned major awards and nominations. While the film didn’t necessarily break new ground in terms of gender or racial representation, it still served as an example of how bold, truth-driven journalism can spark conversations on justice, leadership, and freedom.
7. Add interview clips, images, hotlinks and/or quotes from reviews.
0 notes
Text
Week 10: Wed Mar 26: DIGITAL DETOX EXPERIMENT & 2nd BOOK REVIEW DUE: How to Do Nothing by Jenny Odell
1. DIGITAL DETOX Experiment: Leave your phone at home for one hour to take a walk in your neighborhood. Write down your observations when you return and draw a map of your path. (This is a hand drawn map, not a screenshot of Google or Apple Maps.)
2. Afterwards, take a photo of your hand drawn map to include in your book review. What did you observe? Did you notice animals, trees, sounds and sights that you'd never seen before? Did the experience provide any revelations? Were you anxious, relieved, inspired?
For my digital detox experiment, my boyfriend and I walked to our favorite coffee shop and sat on a bench in front of the nearby church. We drank our coffee in the sun. We do this every Sunday, but usually we drive. It is super close, but we usually grocery shop afterwards and need the car. I always look forward to it because there’s a beautiful blossom tree outside the church, with the bench right underneath it. It’s so nice to just sit back, people-watch, drink coffee, and feel the sun on your skin.
Walking there instead of driving definitely made it feel like a different journey, even though it was the same path. It was also weird not having my phone. Normally, I use this time to relax and spend quality time with my boyfriend, but I kept saying things and instinctively reaching for my phone to reference what I was talking about. It didn’t make me anxious, but it definitely highlighted how much of a habit it is.
I love this tradition, it always makes me feel refreshed and grounded after taking some time for myself.
2. What is your favorite quote from the book and why do you find it meaningful?
“The point of doing nothing, as I define it, isn’t to return to work refreshed and ready to be more productive, but rather to question what we currently perceive as productive.”
I love this quote because it encapsulates a lot of ideas from Jenny O’Dell’s book and flips the perspective we have often been told. We are often encouraged to take a break from work in order to get more done. However, this quote emphasizes the importance of rest being for you. Taking a break for your own wellbeing is productive because we are humans and not machines.
3. Why do you think this book, released by indie publishing house Melville Press, became an unexpected bestseller during the height of the Covid19 pandemic? Her book was so successful, she recently released a second title, Saving Time: Discovering a Life Beyond the Clock.
I think this book became an unexpected best seller during the height of the Covid19 pandemic because people were forced to slow down and weren’t sure how to. In today's world everything is so fast paced and we are constantly stimulated. During the pandemic, we had to confront our relationship with time and productivity. Jenny Odell’s book acts as a guide and action plan for stepping away from the constant stimulation that many of us needed during that desperate time.
4. How does the attention economy benefit from our social media activity and media streaming consumption?
The attention economy profits from our online activity. Social media platforms and streaming services are designed to keep us engaged for as long as possible, using our behavior and preferences to create targeted advertising and drive revenue. With every interaction, we generate data that’s sold to advertisers, making our attention the real product. As more users join and engage, these platforms become even more valuable, deepening the cycle.
5. How does this book relate to the topic of celebrity culture?
As I was reading the book and responding to this question, I couldn’t help but think about my capstone project for my interior design studio. I’m focusing on social media beauty influencers through the lens of overconsumption, lack of transparency, and authenticity. Influencers, like modern-day celebrities, have become central figures in the attention economy and digital culture, monetizing their appearance, lifestyle, and personal brand to keep us engaged. Through carefully curated content, they craft aspirational narratives that often blur the line between what’s real and what’s performative. This drives comparison, fuels unrealistic beauty standards, and encourages constant consumerism. Every post, like, and view becomes a transaction, not just for the influencer, but for the platforms profiting from our attention.
6. Do you take digital detox breaks regularly? If yes, describe them. Were they more challenging during the quarantine era? Why?
I don’t usually go out of my way to take a full-on detox break, but there have definitely been times in my life when I’ve relied on Do Not Disturb mode. It helped me stop the habit of instantly checking every notification. During quarantine, screens were pretty much our only way to stay connected, so we were on them constantly. But after a while, it got really draining. These days, I try to be more intentional with how I spend time on screens. Social media especially can be such a drain—it’s like it sucks the energy out of you, and then suddenly you’ve spent hours scrolling because you don’t have the energy to do something more productive.
7. Do you sleep with your phone or computer? Are you aware of the impacts on your sleep cycles and relaxation caused by 24/7 proximity? Have you experimented with leaving digital devices in a drawer or another room?
I do sleep with my phone next to me. I have heard it does impact your sleep but I haven’t done much of my own research into how harmful it is. I definitely want to get in the habit of charging it in another room. This will also force me to get up at the first alarm! I’ve noticed that when I check the time in the middle of the night, it’s way too easy to glance at my notifications, and before I know it, I’m scrolling on TikTok. Then I either don’t have enough time to fall back asleep or I just can’t, because the screen time totally wakes me up.
8. What does Odell mean by 'doing nothing?' Are we capable of doing nothing?
It’s funny how we actually need a guide on how to “do nothing.” In today’s world, we’re constantly overstimulated, and taking a step back can feel almost uncomfortable. When Odell talks about “doing nothing,” she’s really talking about resisting the pull of the attention economy and reclaiming your awareness. It’s about shifting your focus to the present moment—your surroundings, your thoughts, your inner world. I think we’re capable of it, but it definitely takes effort. Our culture has trained us to always be doing, watching, or consuming something. But doing nothing can be a powerful way to push back and give yourself a moment to just be.
9. What is the role of nature in Odell's book, in particular the role of birds? (P.S. Did you know that birdwatching became a HUGE pastime in the Covid era?)
Nature plays an important role in Odell’s philosophy. In particular, she references birds because they are symbols of presence, observation, and slowness. Watching them is a way to reconnect with the world around us. The reminder that we are part of a larger, living world can be healing. This is why birdwatching became popular during covid, it is a simple way to ground yourself.
0 notes
Text
Week Nine: Wed Mar 19: Documentaries and Social Change: Part One: Film Review
1. Film trailer and link to film's website.
youtube
2. What important social issue question does this documentary ask and what type of storytelling does it employ to answer it? (2 paragraphs)Descendant asks an important question: How do we confront the parts of American history that have been buried (literally and figuratively) and what does justice look like for the people still living with the consequences? This documentary focuses on the story of the Clotilda, the last known slave ship to arrive in the U.S. after slavery was abolished in 1808, and the descendants of those brought on that ship who built Africatown. It highlights how this history was intentionally erased, and how the trauma still lingers today, not just emotionally, but physically through environmental injustice and generational loss.
The way the story is told feels deeply personal. Rather than just focusing on experts or facts, it lets the descendants tell their own story, share their memories, and explain how this history continues to shape their lives. It combines oral history, archival footage, and current-day struggles in Africatown in a way that’s both emotional and eye-opening. It’s not just about finding a sunken ship, it’s about reclaiming a narrative that was taken from them and giving voice to a community that’s still fighting to be heard.
3. What new story is revealed in this film, and what revelations have emerged from it to impact popular discourse? (2 paragraphs)
The film uncovers a story that many people had only heard through word of mouth—the legend of Clotilda. For years, there was no physical proof that it existed because the ship was burned and sunken to cover up the crime. But descendants always knew the truth, even if the world didn’t believe them. The discovery of the ship finally gave them the evidence they never needed but always deserved. It wasn’t just about the past, it validated the pain and resilience of generations who were told to forget.
Since the film's release, the story of Africatown has gained more attention. It’s not just a historical curiosity, it’s become part of the larger conversation around reparations, environmental racism, and what it really means to acknowledge and make amends for America’s past. The Clotilda’s discovery sparked new interest in preserving descendant-led communities and raised questions about who profits from history, and who has the right to tell it.
4. What personal revelations did you glean from this film? What shocked or inspired you? How has this film changed your perspective on the subject? (1-2 paragraphs)
What shocked me most was how the community of Africatown was not only forced to bury its history but has also been surrounded and harmed by toxic industries. It’s heartbreaking to see how even after being “freed,” they were still systematically targeted. Kids played in what looked like snow, not knowing it was pollution from the paper mill—that really stuck with me.
I came away feeling inspired by the descendants’ strength. Even after generations of being silenced, they’ve kept their history alive. This film made me realize that justice isn’t just about punishing people, it’s about giving people their stories back, giving them control over their land and legacy, and making sure they’re finally heard.
5. How did this documentary expand the reputation of the subject, and how did it serve to further the spotlight on a key social change issue? (2 paragraphs)
The documentary gave Africatown the national recognition it has long deserved. For so long, the story was ignored or doubted because there wasn’t physical proof. But “Descendant” helped change that—it brought attention to the community’s legacy, their struggles, and their fight for justice today. It made clear that this isn’t just about a shipwreck; it’s about people who’ve had to carry a history of pain without acknowledgement.
It also shows how environmental racism plays out in real time. Africatown is surrounded by heavy industry that has led to health problems and taken over land that once belonged to the community. The film makes it impossible to ignore how history connects directly to the present. By highlighting their fight over land ownership, it shows how the past is still shaping their future and how they’re determined to reclaim it.
6. Did the film prove pivotal for the director/producers' careers? Were they historic for expanded gender and racial representation in storytelling? (1 paragraph)
Yes, this film was a big moment for director Margaret Brown. It also got a huge boost through Higher Ground, Barack and Michelle Obama’s production company, which helped bring the story to a bigger audience. What’s really meaningful, though, is how the film prioritizes the voices of the people of Africatown. It centers Black stories in a way that feels respectful and authentic by not speaking for them, but letting them speak for themselves. Seeing American history through the African American lens can expand our understanding of the past.
7. Add interview clips, images, hotlinks and/or quotes from reviews.
Here are two quotes I took note of while watching the documentary:
Quote 1: “A fight over zoning, is a fight over destiny”
Quote 2: “They made us free, but now we got no country and no land”
0 notes
Text
Week Seven: Wed Mar 5: SHROOMS: Spotlight on the Superpowers of Fungi
Beneath the Earth’s surface, life thrives in harmony, woven into the vast mycelial networks that sustain all living things. Cities do not rise from concrete and steel but grow like living organisms, their walls formed from breathing fungal structures that purify the air and adapt to the needs of the people. The air is crisp and rich with oxygen, filtered by the underground ecosystem that absorbs toxins and exhales life. There is no waste, no pollution, only renewal. Homes, food, and medicine all come from the same mycological source, ensuring that nothing is separate from the cycle of existence.
Above ground, the Earth heals itself. Towering forests stretch endlessly, knit together by mycorrhizal fungi, their roots sharing water and nutrients through the underground web. Rivers run clear, no longer poisoned by industry. The remains of the old world slowly dissolve, consumed by fungi that break them down into nutrients. Humanity does not rule this place. Instead, people walk the land as caretakers, not conquerors, observing and learning rather than taking. No one owns land, no one hoards resources. Nature is not something to be exploited but something to be understood.
Artists and innovators shape this world, not through domination, but through collaboration with nature. Architects cultivate structures that breathe, shifting with the seasons. Painters and storytellers use fungal pigments and living ink, their creations shifting and growing. In this world, art is alive, woven into the cycle, never static, never separate.
With no need for money or ownership, people live in balance, their survival ensured by the fungi that provide everything they need. Mushrooms are food, medicine, clothing, even technology. In death, people return to the network, placed into mycelial cocoons that break them down, feeding the forests above. The mycelium carries their essence forward, ensuring that even in passing, they remain part of the cycle. The answer to everything is fungi, the quiet force that once made life possible and now ensures it will never end. Above, the world regenerates. Below, the people listen. Together, they move in harmony, woven into the endless, living fabric of the mycelial web.
0 notes
Text
Week Six: Wed Feb 26: Climate Justice, Food Sustainability and Black Lives Matter
1. Who is Leah Thomas and what happened at COP 26?
Leah Thomas is an environmentalist and writer who has been a strong advocate for intersectional environmentalism. When she was invited to attend COP26, she saw it as an opportunity to explore whether intersectionality was truly embedded in climate conversations and whether the conference was actually driving the urgent climate action the world needs. However, she left feeling unseen and unheard. She and other BIPOC attendees couldn’t shake the feeling that their invitations were more about meeting a diversity quota than genuinely including their voices in the discussions. While their presence was documented in photos, their messages weren’t meaningfully acknowledged. Events focused on Black and Indigenous liberation were held, but they took place in hidden rooms, largely unnoticed by the broader conference. Despite this disappointment, Leah found solidarity with other BIPOC youth and climate activists from around the world who shared her frustration with the commercialization and performative nature of COP26. These activists remained committed to creating space, building community, and pushing for change, whether or not world leaders chose to listen.
2. Watch the video about Harlem Grown and visit their website. Choose one key aspect of the genesis and growth of this project that inspires you. How does this initiative relate to mutual aid, community health and sustainability?
One of the most inspiring aspects of Harlem Grown is its commitment to empowering children by giving them hands-on experience in growing their own food. The youth garden in Harlem serves as an educational space where kids, many of whom come from low-income families or live in homeless shelters, can engage with nature in a way they otherwise wouldn’t have access to. Beyond just planting seeds in the ground, the program plants seeds of knowledge, self-sufficiency, and possibility in their minds. This initiative embodies the spirit of mutual aid by fostering a community-driven solution to food insecurity, where education and sustainability go hand in hand. By teaching children how to grow their own food, Harlem Grown not only promotes healthier eating habits but also strengthens community ties and environmental awareness. Events like their Halloween festival, which brought together over 400 people in a small space, highlight how the garden serves as more than just a source of fresh produce—it’s a hub for connection, resilience, and shared support. In a world where access to healthy food is often determined by socioeconomic status, initiatives like Harlem Grown offer a powerful example of how grassroots efforts can address systemic issues while inspiring future generations.
3. What is Intersectional Environmentalism and how does it relate to Black Lives Matter?
Intersectional Environmentalism is an inclusive approach to environmental advocacy that recognizes the interconnectedness of social and environmental justice. It emphasizes the protection of both people, especially marginalized communities, and the planet, acknowledging that environmental harm disproportionately impacts BIPOC communities. The history of the United States, originally known as Turtle Island, illustrates this connection. Before colonization, Indigenous peoples lived in harmony with nature. However, colonization led to widespread environmental destruction, as land and labor were exploited for profit. This pattern of environmental degradation and systemic oppression continued, with the voices and contributions of Black, Indigenous, and other communities of color deliberately erased from mainstream environmental narratives. Intersectional Environmentalism seeks to reclaim these histories and ensure that environmental justice includes those who have long been excluded from the conversation.
This framework directly relates to the Black Lives Matter movement because both fight for justice, equity, and the recognition of historically silenced voices. Just as BLM advocates against racial injustice, Intersectional Environmentalism highlights how environmental harm is often racialized, with issues like pollution, lack of access to clean water, and climate disasters disproportionately affecting Black and brown communities. Environmental injustice is a form of racial injustice. The goal of Intersectional Environmentalism is not just to protect the planet, but to amplify the contributions of BIPOC individuals in the environmental movement, reclaim relationships with nature, and support initiatives that create a more just and equitable future. By engaging in discussions and uplifting these narratives, this movement pushes for environmental solutions that do not exclude the very people who have been most impacted by ecological harm.
4. Who is Leah Penniman? What is Soul Fire Farm and why is it important to the climate movement?
Leah Penniman is a farmer, educator, and activist dedicated to addressing racial and environmental injustices in the food system. She is the founding co-director and farm manager of Soul Fire Farm, an Afro-Indigenous-centered community farm and training center committed to uprooting racism and seeding sovereignty in agriculture. Through farming, education, and policy work, Penniman and her team aim to reclaim land stewardship for Black and Indigenous communities, many of whom have been historically dispossessed of their agricultural heritage due to systemic racism and land theft. Her work challenges the industrial food system, which disproportionately harms communities of color through food apartheid, environmental degradation, and lack of access to fresh, nutritious food.
Soul Fire Farm is deeply connected to the climate movement because it prioritizes regenerative, carbon-sequestering farming practices that heal both the land and the people tending to it. The farm operates with a philosophy that the land is not a commodity but a living relative, deserving of respect and care. Honoring ancestral wisdom, they use Ifa divination from West Africa to seek permission from the land before making significant changes, such as cutting down a tree or altering an ecosystem. Their agricultural methods—including no-till farming, cover crops, composting, agroforestry, and native species restoration—not only enrich the soil but also help mitigate climate change by capturing carbon and improving biodiversity. This reverence for the land reflects a larger movement toward sustainable, culturally-rooted environmental practices that counteract industrial farming’s harmful impact. As Penniman and her team emphasize, listening to the land is not just an ancient practice—it is a necessary path forward to heal the environment and restore balance between people and nature. In a world where climate solutions often ignore the voices of those most affected, Soul Fire Farm stands as a model of resilience, sustainability, and social justice.
5. Explore "Black Forager" aka Alexis Nikole on TikTok or Instagram (@blackforager): choose a favorite post and, ideally, try the recipe! What is your experience of her content and what important issues does she raise? What elements are key to the incredible growth of her following (4.5 million on TikTok, 1.8 million on Instagram, 15.5K on Bluesky and counting...)?
One of my favorite videos from Alexis Nikole is the one where she introduces the English yew with a catchy song: "This plant here is poison. It's also a snack. The secret is knowing you eat this part, not that." I was especially drawn to this video because I had always been told that the berries were entirely poisonous, so learning that the flesh is actually edible (as long as the toxic seed is removed) was fascinating. Her content is so successful because she makes learning feel like a fun, casual conversation rather than a lecture. She uses humor, music, and an engaging personality to break down complex information, making foraging and plant education feel exciting and accessible. Beyond entertainment, she raises important issues about food sovereignty, sustainability, and reclaiming ancestral knowledge, teaching people how to see food beyond grocery stores and reconnect with nature. Her ability to blend education with joy is why she has amassed millions of followers, proving that people are eager for engaging, hands-on learning about the environment and the food sources hidden in plain sight.
6. How do you define food sovereignty in your own life? Do you grow your own food? Do you forage? Compost? Did the pandemic change your food habits? How do you connect to the 'black gold' of soil? Have you ever volunteered at a community garden?
Food sovereignty, to me, is about having a connection to the food I consume, understanding where it comes from, and making choices that align with sustainability and self-sufficiency. Growing up, my mom always had a small garden, and I would help her water the plants and pick fresh produce, including fruits, vegetables, and herbs. She also taught me how to compost, instilling in me an early awareness of food waste and soil health. Although I currently live in an apartment in New York and don’t have a garden, I hope to have one when I own a home, where I can grow my own food and contribute to a more self-sustaining lifestyle. While I haven’t been part of a community garden outside of school, I appreciate the sense of collective care and resilience they foster, especially in urban settings where access to fresh food can be limited.
7. Choose one of the people mentioned in the article by Leah Thomas to profile with a one-paragraph bio.
Kevin J. Patel is a dedicated climate justice activist from Los Angeles, CA, whose advocacy is deeply personal—growing up with severe heart issues caused by the city’s poor air quality, he has firsthand experience of the climate crisis's impact. Recognizing the need for direct action beyond protests and policy discussions, he founded OneUpAction International in 2019 to empower marginalized youth with the resources necessary to drive change in their communities. Through this initiative, he played a key role in establishing LA County’s first Youth Climate Commission, ensuring that young voices are heard in climate decision-making. As a UN Togetherband Ambassador and a National Geographic Young Explorer, Kevin continues to push for intersectional environmentalism, challenging the traditional narratives of the climate movement to center the experiences of Black, Indigenous, and people of color. Currently pursuing a degree in Political Science at Loyola Marymount University, he remains committed to creating inclusive solutions and ensuring that those most affected by environmental injustices have a seat at the table.
0 notes
Text
Week Three: Wed Feb 5: Who is Chef José Andrés? Mutual Aid and World Central Kitchen
1. Explore World Central Kitchen's website. Choose a story that inspires you. Share a photo from the site and explain its significance.
I found this image in an article titled “WCK is Supporting Families Rebuilding in Gaza.” The image features a young girl named Sabah, one of the many children fed daily through the efforts of World Central Kitchen in southern Gaza. This week, she was served bean stew, a meal that reminded her of her grandmother and the home-cooked meals she used to enjoy. Sabah’s story reveals how food has the unique power to connect us to home, family, and community, even in the most challenging times.
2. What is Mutual Aid? How does World Central Kitchen disrupt traditional models of Mutual Aid? How does their work expand the definition of Mutual Aid?
When I google search the term mutual aid, it is defined as “a collaborative way for community members to help each other meet basic needs. It can involve sharing resources, services, and support to overcome barriers like social, economic, and political challenges.” Traditional models of mutual aid rely on grassroots efforts, where members of a community come together to provide direct support to one another, often without external funding or professional organization. World Central Kitchen disrupts traditional mutual aid models by incorporating professional culinary expertise, large-scale coordination, and innovative technology into their operations. While they maintain the grassroots idea of mutual aid through collaboration with local chefs, volunteers, and suppliers, they expand the model by using their global network and infrastructure to respond rapidly and effectively to crises.
3. How does Chef José Andrés and his organization provide innovative ways to solve world problems beyond the traditional role of the Red Cross, FEMA, etc? Have they proved to be a welcome form of disruption?
Chef José Andrés and WCK innovate beyond traditional humanitarian organizations like the Red Cross and FEMA by emphasizing speed, adaptability, cultural sensitivity, and community empowerment. While organizations like the Red Cross often provide relief and depart after the initial crisis phase, WCK remains on the ground, fostering long-term resilience and self-reliance in affected communities. Their innovative model has proven to be a welcome form of disruption. Their ability to bridge short-term relief with long-term change makes them a model for modern humanitarian efforts.
4. Write an imagined dialogue between a WCK volunteer and a survivor on the frontlines of a disaster. What would they say to each other?
Volunteer: "Hi, my name is Julia, and I’m with World Central Kitchen. How are you holding up today?"
Survivor: “It's been difficult and scary. I haven’t eaten in days.”
Volunteer: “I’m so sorry to hear that. We’re here to help. We’ve prepared some hot meals for you and your family. Let me bring you some right away."
Survivor: "Thank you. This means so much to us. It’s not just the food, it’s knowing someone cares."
Volunteer: "You’re not alone in this. We’re staying here to support you through this tough time.”
5. What does this organization tell you about the expansion of altruism? Does WCK provide a hopeful model of solution-making for the future of a changing planet?
World Central Kitchen (WCK) represents a powerful evolution of altruism, demonstrating how compassion can be amplified through innovation, collaboration, and sustainability. The organization expands the concept of altruism from simply helping those in immediate need to empowering communities with tools and knowledge to rebuild and thrive.
WCK provides a hopeful model for the future by proving that effective solutions to global challenges are possible when humanity, technology, and local expertise align. Their emphasis on cultural respect, sustainability, and community engagement shows how aid can go beyond temporary relief to create lasting positive change.
Key Quote: “In the aftermath, José listened to the local community and began organizing efforts to provide nourishing, culturally appropriate meals to people in need, recognizing that food is more than sustenance—it’s a plate of hope on our darkest days."
Sometimes, when organizations aim to assist outside communities, they assume they know best and impose solutions that may not align with the community's unique way of life. A one-size-fits-all approach rarely works. I appreciate how WCK takes the time to listen to the community, ensuring they understand how the community wants to be supported.
0 notes
Text
Week 2: Megawatt Celebrityhood and the Attention Economy
How can celebrities authentically use their influence and power for social good?
Celebrities have the power to drive social change through their influence and wealth. However, activism often feels performative. To be truly authentic, celebrities must deeply understand the issues they advocate for and work closely with affected communities. Posting a donation link or raising awareness on social media is a start, but without real engagement, it can come across as disingenuous. If a celebrity asks their followers, who earn a fraction of their income, to donate, their name should be at the top of the donor list with a significant contribution. Speaking up is important, but it must be backed by genuine belief and action. Celebrities must do more than post—they should use their platform to create tangible impact and also work outside of social media to make change.
Can they become superhero(ine)s for social change to influence and impact much-needed accelerated change?
Yes, but only if they actively engage with the communities they aim to help. Being a "superhero" for social change requires more than just online activism. Real change happens through direct involvement: meeting people, understanding their struggles, and taking hands-on action. Social media should amplify the work, not replace it. Technology can create a sense of detachment, making efforts feel performative rather than meaningful. The most impactful celebrities are those who show up, contribute their time and resources, and connect on a human level.
Is the nature of celebrityhood, in an era of superstorms and super-sized global issues undergoing a transformation for social good? How?
Celebrity culture is evolving as audiences demand more accountability. When influencers and celebrities continue posting normal content while major global issues unfold, they are increasingly called out in comment sections. Cancel culture is shifting, people now expect those with influence to align with social causes. Today’s audiences want genuine, relatable figures who use their platforms for good. When celebrities ignore pressing issues, they risk appearing out of touch or indifferent, which alienates their followers. We are who we follow, and modern audiences prefer leaders who reflect their values.
In light of recent statistics on celebrity private jet usage, will proposals to tax them at a high rate make a difference? Would this solve the issue of global warming caused by airplane emissions and climate crisis level overconsumption? Should they be taxed for other forms of overconsumption (wardrobes, SUVs, multiple properties, water usage, etc)?
Taxing private jet usage alone won’t solve the climate crisis, but it’s a step in the right direction. Many celebrities are disconnected from the consequences of their lifestyle choices, and taxing overconsumption could force them to acknowledge their impact. While a full system to tax all forms of excess (luxury wardrobes, SUVs, multiple properties, excessive water use) is difficult to implement, those who over consume should be required to give back. The world isn’t just for the wealthy, when their consumption harms the planet, they endanger everyone. Accountability must be enforced.
How can we reward celebrities who align with social causes? And how can we discern greenwashing spin from true commitment to sustainable innovation?
The media often highlights scandals over positive contributions. Instead of traditional rewards, we should amplify the efforts of celebrities making a real difference, using visibility as encouragement for others to follow, while also calling out people causing harm. However, before celebrating anyone, thorough research is essential. Many brands claim sustainability while using single-use plastics or other unsustainable practices. Consumers must also be informed and discerning, supporting brands and individuals who align their actions with their words.
Imagine the next generation of admired celebrities: what would they be known for? Write an imagined bio for a celebrity of the future.
The next generation of celebrities will be known for their authenticity, relatability, and commitment to making the world a better place. While social media has allowed for more personal connections, fame can quickly create a disconnect. Future celebrities will need to maintain their grounding, prioritizing societal good over self-interest. Instead of self-centered extravagance, they will champion causes beyond their personal benefit, helping not because it serves their image, but because they truly care. This generation of public figures will redefine influence, proving that true success isn’t just about wealth or status but about meaningful impact.
0 notes
Text
Week 1: Introductions
Hi! My name is Julia, and I’m currently in my senior year studying Interior Design. I moved to NYC when I started college, but I’m originally from Boston, Massachusetts. I love cooking, working out, and organizing.
My favorite celebrity changemaker is Angelina Jolie because of her continuous humanitarian work and refugee advocacy, especially for women and children. Jolie has founded several impactful organizations, including the National Center for Refugee and Immigrant Children, which provides free legal aid to children seeking asylum in the United States, the Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) program, which ensures that unaccompanied immigrant and refugee children have proper legal representation, and the Jolie Legal Fellows Program, which supports lawyers and advocates working to protect human rights in developing countries. Jolie’s dedication to these causes is shown through her hands-on approach. While visiting a refugee camp, she once said, “A refugee woman, living nowhere, raising five kids with no food, does not need me to cry. She isn't crying. She needs me to go find some solutions for her.” This sets a powerful example for other celebrities, showing how their influence, resources, and platforms can be used to drive meaningful change and spread awareness.
Source: https://www.oscars.org/governors-awards/2013/angelina-jolie#:~:text=Jolie%20founded%20and%20continues%20to,the%20U.S.%20immigration%20system%20alone.
1 note
·
View note