febfemality

[febfemality]

[text post from @killjoyfem]

[febfemality]

my hope is that the homosexual and bisexual community/ies manage to kick kink, bdsm, furry, and trans out soon cuz this shit is ridiculous. these asocial kids and groomers taking advantage of their lack of experience with the world are so fucking annoying, why is our culture run by these online children and brainrot weirdos

[febfemality]

trans activists are now mad at the term febfem because they hate female homosexuality

[febfemality]

dylan fox

[febfemality]

Yonic

[febfemality]

[febfemality]

https://lgbtqia.wiki/wiki/Political_Lesbianism I just found out that "queer wiki" equates febfems with political lesbianism and draws no distinction. I hate gender ideology so much. I don't want to date men! That doesn't mean I must think I'm a lesbian!

Of course they do. 'Queer' people cannot comprehend someone not choosing men. It's not something that registers as a legitimate possibility for them. So, if a group of women say that they chose not to act on any potential possibility of attraction to a man and focus on women, well then clearly it's political, clearly they're trying to be lesbians. Which simply means that they need to be fixed with political shaming and the same pressure tactics they would turn on lesbians because if you're the same because of politics, they can fix you the same way. It's honestly disgusting

[febfemality]

Conservative homophobes compare homosexuality to paraphilias to attack homosexuals. Queer homophobes compare homosexuality to paraphilias to defend their paraphilias. Both agree homosexuality is comparable to a fetish and get enraged when homosexuals oppose them

[febfemality]

Margaret Atwood, from “The Year of the Flood,” originally published in 2009

[febfemality]

no man's land dead ahead ⚢

[febfemality]

Recently I’ve been thinking about different components of sexual orientation, and how it is effectively formed of both internal identity and external behaviour. It’s interesting that, without a detailed conversation with other individuals, we can only assume their orientation and identity on the basis of their external behaviour, which is all that is visible to us.

For example, if someone is in a long term, committed, monogamous relationship with a member of the opposite sex, they are assumed to be straight, and their behaviour is interpreted as representative of heterosexuality. But they might be bisexual. If someone is in a long term, committed, monogamous relationship with a member of the same sex, they are assumed to be gay/lesbian, and their behaviour is interpreted as representative of homosexuality. But they might be bisexual.

In this context, what external behaviour could someone exhibit that would lead to the assumption they were bisexual, and therefore that their behaviour is representative of bisexuality? They’d have to be engaging with the same sex and the opposite sex more or less simultaneously in order not to be assumed to be straight or gay/lesbian. How might that work?

They could be having regular sex with multiple people of both sexes (bisexuals are promiscuous, bisexuals are easy, bisexuals are sluts). They could be having multiple concurrent and short term relationships with people of both sexes (bisexuals can’t commit, bisexuals will leave you for a member of the other sex). They could be having sex with people of both sexes at the same time (bisexuals are kinky, bisexuals have group sex, bisexuals want to have threesomes all the time). They could have a committed relationship with a member of one sex, and affairs with members of the other sex (bisexuals CHEAT). They could be non-monogamous and having various relationships with members of both sexes (bisexuals can’t be satisfied with just one person).

So. In order for other people to recognise you as a bisexual person, you have to be engaging in some form of stigmatised and nonconforming sexual activity, all of which just happen to be typical stereotypes about bisexuality. The only way to be perceived as a bisexual person is to conform with bisexual stereotypes. A bisexual person who doesn’t conform to a single bisexual stereotype cannot be perceived as a bisexual person, and therefore cannot disprove or undermine those stereotypes in the mind of the person perceiving them. Because if they don’t conform to a single bisexual stereotype, they are perceived as heterosexual/homosexual, and their nice, conforming, virtuous behaviour is ascribed to that perceived monosexual identity. Even if they had previously exhibited bisexual behaviour (bisexuality is just a phase, they’ll eventually pick a side).

Alternatively, they could verbally assert their identity regularly enough to offset the assumptions others make on the basis of their behaviour (bisexuals are self-obsessed).

There is no way of being consistently perceived as a bisexual person, in the current landscape, without reinforcing bisexual stereotypes in the minds of those perceiving you, because if you don’t align with and reinforce those stereotypes you are unperceivable as a bisexual person.

[febfemality]

people will really have blogs where every second post is about how much they hate bisexuals and how bisexuality is inherently wrong and then be like now why would anyone think theres prejudice against bisexuals

[febfemality]

Controversial take but..

That normal bi woman who you can't clock as bi without her telling you is way more authentically LGB than any rainbow covered they/them who only dates women if they're amab. If you have to try to look gay to feel included in the LGB community, maybe you aren't meant to be in this community. LGB needs to be a separate community from TQ at this point, the divide between us is obvious, but instead they're kicking same sex attracted people out of our own spaces.

[febfemality]

https://lgbtqia.wiki/wiki/Political_Lesbianism I just found out that "queer wiki" equates febfems with political lesbianism and draws no distinction. I hate gender ideology so much. I don't want to date men! That doesn't mean I must think I'm a lesbian!

Of course they do. 'Queer' people cannot comprehend someone not choosing men. It's not something that registers as a legitimate possibility for them. So, if a group of women say that they chose not to act on any potential possibility of attraction to a man and focus on women, well then clearly it's political, clearly they're trying to be lesbians. Which simply means that they need to be fixed with political shaming and the same pressure tactics they would turn on lesbians because if you're the same because of politics, they can fix you the same way. It's honestly disgusting

[febfemality]

[febfemality]

Reasons to not date a man:

1. Too many red flags

2. Their brains aren't wired to think

3. They are socialised to be assholes and not think

4. Sometimes they talk and it isn't nice

[febfemality]

https://lgbtqia.wiki/wiki/Political_Lesbianism I just found out that "queer wiki" equates febfems with political lesbianism and draws no distinction. I hate gender ideology so much. I don't want to date men! That doesn't mean I must think I'm a lesbian!

Of course they do. 'Queer' people cannot comprehend someone not choosing men. It's not something that registers as a legitimate possibility for them. So, if a group of women say that they chose not to act on any potential possibility of attraction to a man and focus on women, well then clearly it's political, clearly they're trying to be lesbians. Which simply means that they need to be fixed with political shaming and the same pressure tactics they would turn on lesbians because if you're the same because of politics, they can fix you the same way. It's honestly disgusting