Text
random chaseprice headcanon where victoria owns these cutesy anime figures and chloe uses them as her blunt holders whenever she comes over just to piss her off
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
I thought I'd be a lot more mad about double exposure but honestly everything I've seen about this game so far is so ooc and stupid that it's turning fucking hilarious
Like chaseprice??? Seriously??? Lmfaoooooooooooo
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
No fucking way chaseprice of all things ahsjdjjfjjf
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
literally bro like what in the fuck😭😭😭😭😭
chaseprice being enemies to lovers might be the funniest outcome from de
#i dont ship them and im not against them in any way but this is genuinely the worst/funniest way to put them together#like wdym theyre flirting on social media where max follows them both#wheres the shame#life is strange: double exposure#life is strange spoilers#life is strange#chloe price#victoria chase#chaseprice
34 notes
·
View notes
Text
ur favorite character is now a raging gay person lol get fucked. cant be a gay fantasy if its canon. u have this fantasy that everything is gonna be like the book and ur setting urself up for disappointment bc it is an
A D A P T A T I O N .
u still have ur fran and michael they just wont be on the screen. u havent lost anything ur favorite characters are still there for u to jerk off to in book form
the only change is that gay people will be included with a lot of other things that werent book accurate. u people dont complain about the vast differences between the books and the show until its down to this one change.
also literally everyone complains about gay people being forced even in shows they are central to and original in. u need to stop acting like a victim because one straight couple got changed.
idc when book readers complain i care bc u and ppl like u use this to mask ur overt homophobia and unwillingness to accept change that doesnt affect u at all. theres no affect on u. just dont watch the season
I know I might get hate for this but I don’t like the transition of Michael from male to female.
Like seriously!!!!!!!!
Whyyyyy?????
This changes entire story from the book. Her book was literally named “when he was wicked”
Francesca literally craved for child?? How are they gonna do it? Through adoption??
He was called merry rake. What are they gonna do about that? What are they gonna do about the inheriting the title of earl.
How many times was it mentioned that if Michael didn’t marry and beget an heir then the title would be passed on to their awful relatives.
How are they going to explain him leaving to India to join army?????
TF
This isn’t representation. This is erasure. I don’t have anything against lesbian couples but are they forgetting that they are in regency era.
They literally milking out viewers with their ‘representation’ at this point.
It was one of my favourite books and I completely don’t understand how are they going to play it out.
How are they willing to play out the story.
Make your own original story, don’t write fanfics in the name of adaptation.
I loved Michael. I loved playboy turning into gentleman for the love of their life!!!
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
it’s just not the same character anymore, ur holding on to a fantasy when it’s just not gonna happen, it isnt the same fran and its not gonna be the same story just get over it. if u want it so bad just go reread the books. replacing a man w a woman isnt the same as vice versa and if u don’t understand why u need to take some common sense classes idk what to tell you other than to quit making everything about you straight little fantasy man when you have the rest of the show
I know I might get hate for this but I don’t like the transition of Michael from male to female.
Like seriously!!!!!!!!
Whyyyyy?????
This changes entire story from the book. Her book was literally named “when he was wicked”
Francesca literally craved for child?? How are they gonna do it? Through adoption??
He was called merry rake. What are they gonna do about that? What are they gonna do about the inheriting the title of earl.
How many times was it mentioned that if Michael didn’t marry and beget an heir then the title would be passed on to their awful relatives.
How are they going to explain him leaving to India to join army?????
TF
This isn’t representation. This is erasure. I don’t have anything against lesbian couples but are they forgetting that they are in regency era.
They literally milking out viewers with their ‘representation’ at this point.
It was one of my favourite books and I completely don’t understand how are they going to play it out.
How are they willing to play out the story.
Make your own original story, don’t write fanfics in the name of adaptation.
I loved Michael. I loved playboy turning into gentleman for the love of their life!!!
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
girl have u been paying attention show fran has never mentioned wanting kids badly so like, ur talking at the air about a character that isnt even the same and showing ur true colors
Why are people SO sensitive?
When you don't agree with them or you are sad and frustrated because they ruined the best Bridgerton book (Francesca's story) they start and call you "homophobic, racist".😒
I see that for some people it's so easy to call them that, because that way the know they "won the argument" I'm sorry to tell you this, but YOU are the homophobic and racist if you can't accept a woman story about her grief and struggles with wanting to become a mother so bad but can't.. And then take a beautiful love story between a man and a woman and then turn that same man into a woman..
People do realize that Francesca's dream was becoming a mother right?
I'm sorry but how will she exactly do that now? 😂😭
Next thing you know they will change Sophie too and make him Steve or Stefanos
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
we already got a playboy turned gentleman, season 1
u cant erase straight people u still have the book just go read it again
its an adaptation bruh and this is the first major difference, why are u whining over one major change u have basically the entire story other than this one piece
theyll probably, heres a shocker, adapt the story…. because its an adaptation… theyve already written fran to be different from book fran if uve been paying attention so it shouldnt be a shocker that it would be somehow different
I know I might get hate for this but I don’t like the transition of Michael from male to female.
Like seriously!!!!!!!!
Whyyyyy?????
This changes entire story from the book. Her book was literally named “when he was wicked”
Francesca literally craved for child?? How are they gonna do it? Through adoption??
He was called merry rake. What are they gonna do about that? What are they gonna do about the inheriting the title of earl.
How many times was it mentioned that if Michael didn’t marry and beget an heir then the title would be passed on to their awful relatives.
How are they going to explain him leaving to India to join army?????
TF
This isn’t representation. This is erasure. I don’t have anything against lesbian couples but are they forgetting that they are in regency era.
They literally milking out viewers with their ‘representation’ at this point.
It was one of my favourite books and I completely don’t understand how are they going to play it out.
How are they willing to play out the story.
Make your own original story, don’t write fanfics in the name of adaptation.
I loved Michael. I loved playboy turning into gentleman for the love of their life!!!
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
biphobia is crazy u guys make me laugh, no one is saying it to be a bitch but its like pretty clear theyre going for her as a lesbian bc of the disappointment that crossed her face when she kissed john and she never really cared much for the relationship scene and like sm other subtle shit. which separate could mean anything but putting the pieces together its clear theyre aiming for lesbian fran.
its pretty common to confuse platonic love for romantic love, theres nothing wrong w it and its honestly a pretty realistic depiction of a young persons traversal thru learning to love and im looking forward to seeing if thats how they play it
homophobes are mad at michael being michaela, and biophobes are claiming that francesca and johns relationship is purely platonic SOMEBODY SAVE ME
#pulling out the biphobia line is silly but also sigh#also eloise has been literally shown to like a guy so shes also bi#why do u jump to the stereotype feminist when u think lesbian rep lol#its alright if fran doesnt fit the lesbian stereotype its almost like its a stereotype for a reason!
110 notes
·
View notes
Text
how tf u like that weirdo that literally wanted to get fran pregnant to force her into marrying him, ur a weirdo bro,
also, its not the same story its an adaptation.
also also, women and gay couples in media get erased all the time so L Bozo
also also also, how is it ruined just bc they made her gay, that part just outs u as a homophobe
also also also also, ur a hypocrite u cry saying ur story is erased but then ur like theyll never take the book from us, which is it, are u a victim of the gay agenda or are u strong and independent from the showrunners
u guys just love that one fictional man sm and u see fran as a self insert for urself to goon to bc no real man would ever touch u w a ten foot pole😭
As a fan of the Bridgerton book series who waited years too see my favourite couple's story adapted onto the show, the way the writers took one of, if not the best non-bridgerton male character from the book series and completely messed with his existence in the name of equality or representation is utterly disappointing. Exploring different types of relationships is one thing, but at the cost of a beloved character that many fans were excited to see on screen is not only a mistake, but a slap in the face to all the fans who tolerated the inconsistencies in writing and character assassinations in this show and continued to watch it all for the hope of seeing acceptable, if not mediocre adaptations of their favourite stories.
You can't simply swap the gender of a character and tell the same love story. If they wanted to explore Francesca's sexuality, they could have done so without dragging Michael to it. I would have rather seen them create a whole new character instead of chipping away at him to invent this new character that fits their notions. Not to mention, they completely changed Francesca's character as well until she became almost incomparable to her book counterpart. They kept every other character quite true to themselves and chose to ruin those two. For what? Inclusivity? I simply don't buy it!
And I wonder if everyone that's claiming that the people who's upset about this change is homophobic thinks if it's a crime to love a male character and a heterosexual ship. How would you feel if a female character was swapped with a male character and a homosexual relationship with a heterosexual one? If that happened, everyone would be livid, accusing the creators of the show of being misogynistic and homophobic. In that case, we could also argue that they are misandrists. But that is not necessary because not everything has to do with inclusivity. Some fans can be genuinely upset because the entire story they love so much will now be erased.
When all's said and done, the creative decisions (however terrible they may be) are not ours to make, but they will never be able to ruin the characters and the story of When He Was Wicked. The real story is in the book and that is ours to keep. I for one, am half glad that they will now not have the opportunity to ruin Michael and Francesca's story.
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
im sure if they changed her partner but still kept him a man u bitches would be slobbering that shit up regardless. quit whining u can still jerk it to the books booktok freaks, michael wasnt even a good guy
So let me get this straight, Daphne and Simon fell in love and got married, so did Anthony and Kate, as well as Colin and Penelope. We know that Phillip exists in the show, and the creators have hinted that Sophie does as well, so the odds of philoise and benophie being endgame are pretty good. So possibly, the only couple who will never have their story told on screen is franchael, and people have the audacity to be offended by our anger, say that we have no right to be so, and gaslight us into thinking that it's homophobic to be upset at this? Oh please! Majority of the people in any of the other fandoms wouldn't behave any differently had this been done to them and it's wrong to pretend otherwise.
#L plus ratio suck my gay nuts#L plus ratio its an adaptation go cry#lesbians on top L plus ratio#homophobes suck it#lesbians ftw#lesbian francesca#im sorry john ur actually pretty cool#michael rest in hell that scene in the book was creepy as fuck
47 notes
·
View notes
Text
sometimes in media, you see a queer-coded character, and so you headcanon them as queer - assuming that the source material will never ACTUALLY do it (because that's what I personally grew up with), so yeah, folks are feeling pretty fucking vindicated when the queer-coded characters ARE ACTUALLY QUEER!!!!!
99 notes
·
View notes
Text
sitting here like a dog abandoned on a corner howling for victoria chase crumbs
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
there is no god
Life is Strange no longer on PlayStation? Considering the graphics look weaker than most games lately…meh…
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
so true💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔💔
okay enough about maximus caulkfield WHERE is my victoria. i need her. i need my crumbs. i need more crumbs i cant deal w this void. dick nine ur killing me the other company wouldnt have left me this dry (copium)
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
she hittin dr miami up a bit too often for that face lift
now which one of y'all told Max to get lip fillers
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
if shes not in it chloe is the new rachel
If she's not gonna be in the game then Chloe better be haunting The Fuck out of that narrative. I want old photos, graffiti, her goddamn snowglobe on Max's bookcase.
2K notes
·
View notes