dubiouslynamed
Very Dubious
20K posts
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
dubiouslynamed · 22 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
It wasn't meant to be.
2K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 23 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
45K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 24 minutes ago
Text
"the world isn't kind" ok??? Much more importantly are you?????
142K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 25 minutes ago
Text
  “The fog was where I wanted to be. Halfway down the path you can’t see this house. You’d never know it was here. Or any of the other places down the avenue. I couldn’t see but a few feet ahead. I didn’t meet a soul. Everything looked and sounded unreal. Nothing was what it is.“ - Eugene O'Neill (died: 27 November 1953)
20 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 26 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
47K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 29 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
Woodbury Bottle Works. Noon hour. All are workers.
Record Group 102: Records of the Children's BureauSeries: National Child Labor Committee Photographs taken by Lewis Hine
This black and white photograph shows seven boys standing in front of the open doors of a wooden building.  Two are holding a bicycle while the rest stand around.
12 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 29 minutes ago
Note
hey eklmrlos, thank you for being here and sharing your amazing art with us!
For the request: could you please do Magician Aziraphale and Crowley? Either 1941 oder S1 is fine, i just want Az with his silly little kohl moustache, lol
Tumblr media
thank you for this request!! i have to do more 1941….
833 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 30 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
Look at this adorable breakfast room. I am definitely staying here every time I’m in Ottawa. (And it’s cheaper than the downtown conference hotels!)
4 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 30 minutes ago
Text
So the other night during D&D, I had the sudden thoughts that:
1) Binary files are 1s and 0s
2) Knitting has knit stitches and purl stitches
You could represent binary data in knitting, as a pattern of knits and purls…
You can knit Doom.
However, after crunching some more numbers:
The compressed Doom installer binary is 2.93 MB. Assuming you are using sock weight yarn, with 7 stitches per inch, results in knitted doom being…
3322 square feet
Factoring it out…302 people, each knitting a relatively reasonable 11 square feet, could knit Doom.
283K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 42 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
Some winter coziness
If you need
196 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 43 minutes ago
Text
only 5 seconds
51K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 45 minutes ago
Text
Tumblr media
I've seen a number of people worried and concerned about this language on Ao3s current "agree to these terms of service" page. The short version is:
Don't worry. This isn't anything bad. Checking that box just means you forgive them for being US American.
Long version: This text makes perfect sense if you're familiar with the issues around GDPR and in particular the uncertainty about Privacy Shield and SCCs after Schrems II. But I suspect most people aren't, so let's get into it, with the caveat that this is a Eurocentric (and in particular EU centric) view of this.
The basic outline is that Europeans in the EU have a right to privacy under the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), an EU directive (let's simplify things and call it an EU law) that regulates how various entities, including companies and the government, may acquire, store and process data about you.
The list of what counts as data about you is enormous. It includes things like your name and birthday, but also your email address, your computers IP address, user names, whatever. If an advertiser could want it, it's on the list.
The general rule is that they can't, unless you give explicit permission, or it's for one of a number of enumerated reasons (not all of which are as clear as would be desirable, but that's another topic). You have a right to request a copy of the data, you have a right to force them to delete their data and so on. It's not quite on the level of constitutional rights, but it is a pretty big deal.
In contrast, the US, home of most of the world's internet companies, has no such right at a federal level. If someone has your data, it is fundamentally theirs. American police, FBI, CIA and so on also have far more rights to request your data than the ones in Europe.
So how can an American website provide services to persons in the EU? Well… Honestly, there's an argument to be made that they can't.
US websites can promise in their terms and conditions that they will keep your data as safe as a European site would. In fact, they have to, unless they start specifically excluding Europeans. The EU even provides Standard Contract Clauses (SCCs) that they can use for this.
However, e.g. Facebook's T&Cs can't bind the US government. Facebook can't promise that it'll keep your data as secure as it is in the EU even if they wanted to (which they absolutely don't), because the US government can get to it easily, and EU citizens can't even sue the US government over it.
Despite the importance that US companies have in Europe, this is not a theoretical concern at all. There have been two successive international agreements between the US and the EU about this, and both were struck down by the EU court as being in violation of EU law, in the Schrems I and Schrems II decisions (named after Max Schrems, an Austrian privacy activist who sued in both cases).
A third international agreement is currently being prepared, and in the meantime the previous agreement (known as "Privacy Shield") remains tentatively in place. The problem is that the US government does not want to offer EU citizens equivalent protection as they have under EU law; they don't even want to offer US citizens these protections. They just love spying on foreigners too much. The previous agreements tried to hide that under flowery language, but couldn't actually solve it. It's unclear and in my opinion unlikely that they'll manage to get a version that survives judicial review this time. Max Schrems is waiting.
So what is a site like Ao3 to do? They're arguably not part of the problem, Max Schrems keeps suing Meta, not the OTW, but they are subject to the rules because they process stuff like your email address.
Their solution is this checkbox. You agree that they can process your data even though they're in the US, and they can't guarantee you that the US government won't spy on you in ways that would be illegal for the government of e.g. Belgium. Is that legal under EU law? …probably as legal as fan fiction in general, I suppose, which is to say let's hope nobody sues to try and find out.
But what's important is that nothing changed, just the language. Ao3 has always stored your user name and email address on servers in the US, subject to whatever the FBI, CIA, NSA and FRA may want to do it. They're just making it more clear now.
3K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 20 hours ago
Photo
Tumblr media
501 notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 20 hours ago
Text
i think its just me but it feels like Kirk(tos) is always making this..face filled with something i cant describe but its alot of it
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 20 hours ago
Text
Vivaldi played by the South African elementary school Goede Hoop Marimba Band
Turn ON the sound
81K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 20 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media
25K notes · View notes
dubiouslynamed · 20 hours ago
Text
only 5 seconds
51K notes · View notes