Text
a lovely friend of mine, polya, drew lestat de lioncourt from interview with the vampire/the vampire chronicles as a ferrari driver for me so i thought some of you out there would like this unexpected crossover! thank you so much pol, i loved it 🥰
#people make fun of Lestat’s choice to be a rock star but this is a way more unhinged choice#and i support it#lestat de lioncourt#lestat#iwtv
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Literally drew this last night bc I found the idea funny if both Armands met. Just read in order of the numbers please. Should I make a Daniel one too? And the others? Im currently reading the books and hope my imagination isn't too far of. Anyway, slowly dropping my vampire art on here, bc I'm pretty much justvthe adult-ish version of my 8 year old, little vampire obsessed, self.
69 notes
·
View notes
Text
Do you see the vision?
Guys!!! I’ve cracked it!!! I know why Armand was ✨like that✨ in season 1!! He had recently gotten obsessed with the hit british gameshow Taskmaster. He was just cosplaying Little Alex Horn!!
Giving cryptic tasks ✅
The iPad ✅
Making his contestant (daniel) eat weird things for his amusement ✅
Red herrings ✅
Being relentlessly bullied ✅
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
After the publication of The Queen of the Damned, I requested of my editor that she not give me anymore comments. I resolved to hand in the manuscripts when they were finished. And asked that she accept them as they were. She was very reluctant, feeling that her input had value, but she agreed to my wishes. I asked this due to my highly critical relationship with my work and my intense evolutionary work on every sentence in the work, my feeling for the rhythm of the phrase and the unfolding of the plot and the character development. I felt that I could not bring to perfection what I saw unless I did it alone. In other words, what I had to offer had to be offered in isolation. So all novels published after The Queen of the Damned were written by me in this pure fashion, my editor thereafter functioning as my mentor and guardian.
Edit 9-14-17 -- I fear this gives the wrong impression of my relationship with my editor; her detailed responses to my novels are very important to me, very constructive, and always right on. And there are still times, indeed, often, when she speaks up on a certain line, or a certain character, or a certain moment, asking pertinent questions, asking for more to illuminate, etc. I respect her insights mightily. I respect her responses mightily. ---- And over the years, I've been less threatened my detailed criticism. --- I still believe in the solo voice with all my soul, and when a reader tells me that she loves a certain paragraph or a certain chapter, I must know that I am indeed the sole author of that paragraph, that chapter. But I have become more secure, more able to handle my editor's insights and requests. --- What I have always rebelled against is the popular presumption that all fiction books have to be edited, --- the idea that fiction authors really are eternal adolescents, and, unlike painters or poets, they can't bring their work to perfection without a parental figure at a publishing house going over the work with a blue pencil. I've heard people actually voice this view, that fiction must be subjected to editing by some one else in order to reach its full potential. I have always questioned this. And always will. The publishing house does always have the option to reject a book if they feel it isn't good enough. (
EDIT - Feb. 18, 2019. I came back here this morning because I stumbled on a blog post where some one referred to this post and said it went "viral" in 2018. I was not aware of that. --- Allow me to add this: discussions of editing are confusing because the words involved simply are not precise. Every book published by my publisher, or any New York publisher, is thoroughly copy edited before it goes to the printer. No exceptions. And the copy editor is the final proof reader who catches a multitude of inconsistencies large and small, words that don't mean what the author might think they mean, unintentional repetitions, mistakes in chronology, plain goofs like a blond suddenly described as having black hair, possible dropped words, or sentences that for some reason don't make sense, inconsistent use of capital letters, and a lot of other things I can't now recall. None of my remarks on editors have ever referred to the almighty copy editor. I repeat: every book is copy edited. No exceptions. When I get the copy edited manuscript back, I not only go over ever single correction or query made by the copy editor, I read every single word of the book myself to catch the small mistakes which only I can catch. ---- When I speak of editors, as I have above, I'm speaking of creative editors --- In my case, this means the editor who accepted my first novel for the publishing house, and who has been my mentor, guardian angel, and friend ever since. And she does always respond to my novels with profoundly insightful comments. And she will indeed speak up if she thinks a character or a scene doesn't work as it should. -- My editor and I have one of the longest editor-author relationships in publishing today. We've been together over 40 years. --- I think we're a perfect match. But each such relationship is unique because each author is unique. I found exactly what I needed in my editor. And I count myself as blessed. I hope every aspiring author has good luck in this regard, and I firmly believe that getting to know the editor, becoming relaxed with the editor, and being able to explain one's feelings to the editor are all for the good. Thank you, guys, for all your marvelous comments below.
Anne Rice's thoughts on editors, twice revised for clarity, from her Facebook page.
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
sometimes i think about how rolin jones was actually, genuinely mad at how handsome sam reid was during his audition for lestat
#he called him a handsome chiseled jaw motherfucker and i respect that#prev#as if that’s not an exact description of lestat#interview with the vampire#sam reid#rolin jones
84 notes
·
View notes
Text
Guys!!! I’ve cracked it!!! I know why Armand was ✨like that✨ in season 1!! He had recently gotten obsessed with the hit british gameshow Taskmaster. He was just cosplaying Little Alex Horn!!
Giving cryptic tasks ✅
The iPad ✅
Making his contestant (daniel) eat weird things for his amusement ✅
Red herrings ✅
Being relentlessly bullied ✅
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
IWTV Characters as:
Toasters!
Anonymous request!
Lestat:
Insane. Does it work well? No. But who cares when it looks like that? She hasn't toasted a piece of bread in years but she will sit prominently on your counter nonetheless.
Louis:
Fun to look at but confusing to operate. Needs 3 different adapters to function. If you can figure it out it makes perfect toast every time. This toaster heats up immediately and takes hours to cool down.
Armand:
Petite and adorable but looks can be deceiving. Keeps toast in a cage while it cooks. Passed down from your great aunt. This toaster is a fire hazard and should be handled with caution.
Claudia:
Equal parts cute and effective. Tries to look complicated but really just wants to toast bread, and a lot of it. Can cook at two different temperatures simultaneously. The devil works hard, but this toaster works harder.
Daniel:
Still looks and works great despite being an antique. Only has two settings: burnt and more burnt. A strong exterior that can take a beating. This toaster is fine being a single slice machine, two slices are overrated.
Santiago:
A bastard creation with a cursed aura. Makes everyone uncomfortable and yet nobody can look away. Only looks like this to upstage the microwave. This toaster lives to make you uneasy.
Last one for the night (it's 5:30am help). I love doing these so please submit requests for characters/objects you'd like my take on!
363 notes
·
View notes
Text
Wild to me that there are ship wars for Interview With The Vampire when, as a teen, The Vampire Chronicles were some of my first exposure to non-monogany.
Obviously it wasn't perfect. I mean, Lestat/Louis/Claudia is a textbook example of "relationship broken, add more people (oh no now it's even more broken)," and "not every Vee should become a Triad." If you've ever experienced the drama of an incestuous non-mono community where everyone's dated everyone... those books all get a little too real. There's backstabbing, jealousy, domestic abuse, and more murder than I personally prefer in my own polyamory 😅
But there's also "we belong to each other, why would anything we do with other people affect that?" There's "let's find out what it looks like to be with someone for the rest of my life (or theirs)." The idea that relationships have value even if they don't last forever. That romantic relationships aren't inherently more important than platonic ones. The idea that you can hold multiple people in your heart at the same time, that there's room for everyone. That the relationship escalator (dating > marriage > kids > death) isn't the only (or best) way to have significant, committed relationships.
They introduced the concept of comet relationships to my baby brain more than a decade before I would learn the actual term--those people you don't see for months or years but as soon as you see them it's like no time has passed (a personal favorite for my ADHD ass).
Like, when I say those books changed my brain chemistry, I mean that my silly little self-insert Mary Sue OCs went from "marry my fictional crush and be with them forever" to "what if they only saw each other once or twice a year but it was still incredible" and "what if she was married but also had a vampire lover and everyone was chill about it (and also she was a rock star)" and "what if they all lived in one big house together" and/or "what if lived by herself and found that fulfilling" and "what if men and women and ???" That shit was formative. Some of those little daydream OCs live in my brain to this day.
-
Idk man. I don't have much patience for ship wars anyway (and I'm scratching my head about people getting upset about canon relationships being, you know, canon). But with TVA especially, my brain simply cannot comprehend it in a monogamous framework.
61 notes
·
View notes
Text
Devils Minion-coded:
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hi my name is Benji, I'm 12 and for show-and- tell today I brought my cool pet burnt-up vampire named Armand that I found. He only weighs like thirty pounds right now but he's growing fast!
I feed him bad guys by luring them into his room with the promise of cocaine. He likes flowers, trinkety decorations and Beethoven, both the composer and the movie with the dog.
101 notes
·
View notes
Text
Lestat is the type of guy to take his shirt off at Sephora and point to his nipples “do you have a lipstick in this colour?”
58 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ik Armand is sitting in his Trinity Gate home absolutely PISSED that tiktok is down 💀
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
would marius have made daniel his beta reader when he was writing blood and gold
#it would have been a much more enjoyable book if daniel had been allowed to edit it#he would have probably amped up the homoerotism between marius and mael too…#i think daniel would be a mariusXmael shipper
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
words cannot describe how cunty book!Armand is
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
The rat in question:
Did you do cocain together? Yes.
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
we all know about eric going to gay bars in the seventies at this point but eric frequenting FAMED GAY BDSM SEX CLUB THE ANVIL??
#the odds that man has actually said that he’s in to counter cultures while batting his eyelashes at some hunk is very high#eric bogosian#daniel molloy#interview with the vampire#iwtv
485 notes
·
View notes