She/her. White American college student. Going into opera probably. Chronic posting award winner.HOTD Sideblog
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
washing your face is actually multi tasking because you are also washing your hands and forearms and shirt and countertop and feet and floor and hair
81K notes
¡
View notes
Text
âHow come youâve never seen the Amazon rainforest if youâre from Brazil?â big country
2K notes
¡
View notes
Text
I watched Wicked with my girlfriend last night (while I was high) and I think it was alright. It was very pretty to look at but I thought it dragged around the middle then the ending was too fast.
I guess main thoughts, watching Johnathan Bailey trying to sing was kind of painful bc he really thought he ate. Michelle Yeohâs singing moment was fast atleast. Ariana Grande was very funny but her diction was lacking. Please pronounce consonants I canât understand you. Also one or two pitchy moments at high notes.
0 notes
Text
someone: donât u think itâs disturbing how in the past few years the level of femininity women are expected to perform and the industries theyâre expected to contribute to in order to be taken seriously, especially on platforms like social media, has skyrocketed to the point that perfect makeup, contouring, acrylic nails, and eyelash extensions have become almost a social expectation and when women express no interest in adhering to those standards theyâre met with vitriol and scorn straight woman who thinks Legally Blonde is the apex of feminist media: okay but itâs my choice? if i want to be feminine i should have the right to choose to do that because feminism is about choice
29K notes
¡
View notes
Video
who can i blame for it? i say it runs in the family! Â
(youtube)
3K notes
¡
View notes
Text
That comment on the Betty Cooper runs in the family edit thatâs like âthis is literally better than riverdaleâ donât piss me off this edit is made of footage from the show and is an exploration of the exact themes that the show laid out for us are you STUPIDDD
#!!!!#riverdale#time to go watch runs in the family edit bc my friend canât watch S4 until next week
5 notes
¡
View notes
Text
We canât expect everything to turn out okay all the time but every day there are little things we can do to help each other be okay. For example donating to evacuation funds like this one for families trying to get to safety. The Alanqar family has already been vetted by @/el-shab-hussein and @/nabulsi on their vetted fundraiser list (#264)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1yYkNp5U3ANwILl2MknJi9G7ArY4uVTEEQ1CVfzR8Ioo/htmlview%23gid=0&range=B225
If youâre not able to donate sharing this post would mean a lot to them and me as well :) their link is below
Im just going to tag some of my following list hopefully some of you see this.
@misspiggyforvogueitalia@boag@sluttynurse
@omegaversereloaded @mongoliassweetheart @jpegm4fia@fatasselmerfudd
@brotherblasphemous @1dietcokeinacan @grox @ihavebangs@belloochie
4K notes
¡
View notes
Text
Itâs ok. I will rot today and come out on top tomorrow
0 notes
Text
Putting on a hoodie so nobody sees me grope myself in public
0 notes
Text
riverdale "fans" on twitter are fucking crazy i just saw someone call archie andrews 'straight' like
10 notes
¡
View notes
Note
do you have any ideas about why so many students are struggling with literacy now? I know that illiteracy and reading comprehension have been issues for years and most americans read at like a 5th grade reading level but Iâm curious why it seems to be worse now (pandemic? no child left behind?)
It is everything. Thereâs not one answer. I could talk about this forever so instead I set a five minute timer on my phone and wrote a list of as many of the many things that are causing this on a systemic level that I could think of:
Itâs parents not reading with their kids (a privilege, but some parents have that privilege to be able to do this and donât.)
Itâs youtube from birth and never being bored.
Itâs phasing out phonics for sight words (memorizing without understanding sounds or meaning) in elementary schools in the early aughts.
Itâs defunding public libraries that do all the community and youth outreach.
Itâs NCLB and mandating standardized tests which center reading short passages as opposed to longform texts so students donât build up the endurance or comprehension skills.
Itâs NCLB preventing schools from holding students back if they lack the literacy skills to move onto the next grade because they canât be left behind so theyâre passed on.
Itâs the chronic underfunding of ESL and Special Ed programs for students who need extra literacy support.
Itâs the cultural devaluing of the humanities in favor of stem and business because those make more money which leads to a lot of students to completely disregard reading and writing.ďżź
Itâs the learning loss from covid.
Itâs covid trauma manifesting in a lot of students as learned helplessness, or an inability to âfigure things outâ or push through adversity to complete challenging tasks independently, especially reading difficult texts.
Itâs covid normalizing cheating and copying.
Itâs increasing phone use.
Itâs damage to attention span exacerbated by increased phone use that leaves you without an ability to sit and be bored ever without 2-3 forms of constant stimulation.
Itâs shortform video becoming the predominant form of social media content as opposed to anything text-based.
Itâs starting to also be generative AI.
Itâs the book bans.
what did I miss.
#Yaay a post achnowledging whatâs wrong without just calling kids stupid#I def am too dependant on phone Iâm working on it lol
10K notes
¡
View notes
Text
30K notes
¡
View notes
Text
a feast for crows really is baffling because somehow this 70 year old man wrote a book about climate change and gender dysphoria in 2005 and i donât think he knows he did that.
838 notes
¡
View notes
Text
when i comment on mutual's post on here i feel like a creep like yes hello its me the person that followes you for your posts commenting on your post once again
151 notes
¡
View notes
Note
I'm asking this genuinely, as a 19 yo with no education in economics and a pretty surface level understanding of socialism: can you explain the whole Bananas discourse in a way someone like me might understand? In my understanding it's just "This is just a product we can give up to create better worker conditions and that's fine" but apparently that's not the full picture?
alright so some pretty important background to all this is that we're all talking about the fact that bananas, grown in the global south, are available year-round at extremely low prices all around europe and the USA. it's not really about bananas per so--the banana in this discourse is a synechdoche for all the economic benefits of imperialism.
so how are cheap bananas a result of imperialism? first of all i want to tackle a common and v. silly counterargument: 'oh, these ridiculous communists think it's imperialist for produce to be shipped internationally'. nah. believing that this is the communist objection requires believing in a deeply naive view of international traide. this view goes something like 'well, if honduras has lots of bananas, and people in the usa want bananas and are willing to pay for them, surely everyone wins when the usa buys bananas!'.
there are of course two key errors here and they are both packed into 'honduras has lots of bananas'. for a start, although the bananas are grown in honduras, honduras doesn't really 'have' them, because the plantations are mostly owned by chiquita (formerly known as united fruit) dole, del monte, and other multinationals--when they're not, those multinationals will usually purchase the bananas from honduran growers and conduct the export themselves. and wouldn't you know it, it's those intervening middleman steps--export, import, and retail, where the vast majority of money is made off bananas! so in the process of a banana making its way from honduras to a 7/11, usamerican multinationals make money selling the bananas to usamerican importers who make money selling them to usamerican retailers who make money selling them to usamerican customers.
when chiquita sells a banana to be sold in walmart, a magic trick is being performed: a banana is disappearing from honduras, and yet somehow an american company is paying a second american company for it! this is economic imperialism, the usamerican multinational extracting resources from a nation while simultaneously pocketing the value of those resources.
why does the honduran government allow this? if selling bananas is such a bad deal for the nation, why do they continue to export millions of dollars of banans a year? well, obviously, there's the fact that if they didn't, they would face a coup. the united states is more than willing to intervene and cause mass death and war to protect the profits of its multinationals. but the second, more subtle thing keeping honduras bound to this ridiculously unbalanced relationship is the need for dollars. because the US dollar is the global reserve currency, and the de facto currency of international trade, exporting to the USA is a basic necessity for nations like honduras, guatemala, &c. why is the dollar the global reserve currency? because of usamerican military and economic hegemony, of course. imperialism built upon imperialism!
this is unequal exchange, the neoimperialist terms of international trade that make the 'global economy' a tool of siphoning value and resources from the global south to the imperial core. & this is the second flaw to unravel in 'honduras has a lot of bananas' -- honduras only 'has a lot of bananas' because this global economic hegemony has led to vast unsustainable monoculture banana plantations to dominate the agriculture of honduras. it's long-attested how monoculture growth is unsustainable because it destroys soil and leads to easily-wiped-out-by-infection plants.
so, bananas in the USA are cheap because:
the workers that grow them are barely paid, mistreated, prevented from unionizing, and sometimes murdered
the nations in which the bananas are grown accept brutally unfair trade and tariff terms with the USA because they desperately need a supply of US dollars and so have little position to negotiate
shipping is also much cheaper than it should be because sailors are chronically underpaid and often not paid at all or forced to pay to work (!)
bananas are cheap, in conclusion, because they're produced by underpaid and brutalized workers and then imported on extortionate and unfair terms.
so what, should we all give up bananas? no, and it's a sign of total lack of understanding of socialism as a global movement that all the pearl-clutching usamericans have latched onto the scary communists telling them to stop buying bananas. communism does not care about you as a consumer. individual consumptive choices are not a meaningful arena of political action. the socialist position is not "if there was a socialist reovlution in the usa, we would all stop eating bananas like good little boys", but rather, "if there's a socialist revolution in the countries where bananas are grown, then the availability of bananas in the usa is going to drop, and if you want to be an anti-imperialist in the imperial core you have to accept that".
(this is where the second argument i see about this, 'oh what are you catholic you want me to eat dirt like a monk?' reveals itself as a silly fucking solipsistic misunderstanding)
and again, let's note that the case of the banana can very easily be generalised out to coffee, chocolate, sugar, etc, and that it's not about individual consumptive habits, but about global economic systems. if you are donkey fucking kong and you eat 100 bananas a day i don't care and neither does anyone else. it's about trying to illustrate just one tiny mundane way in which economic imperialism makes the lives of people in the global north more convenient and simpler and so of course there is enormous pushback from people who attach moral value to this and therefore feel like the mean commies are personally calling them evil for eating a nutella or whatever which is frankly pretty tiring. Sad!
tldr: it is not imperialism when produce go on boat but it is imperialism when produce grown for dirt cheap by underpaid workers in a country with a devalued currency is then bought and exported and sold by usamerican companies creating huge amounts of economic value of which the nation in which the banana was grown, let alone the people who actually fucking grew it, don't see a cent -- and this is the engine behind the cheap, available-every-day-all-year-everywhere presence of bananas in the usa (and other places!)
14K notes
¡
View notes