Text
27 notes
·
View notes
Text
Before you correct my pronunciation just know my Mother is from England, and she said all these names are pronounced however I think is funniest, so.
CW: bad british accents
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
I started watching the x files tonight and the effect Gillian Anderson has on me is honestly embarrassing. I feel like I’m holding my breath every time she’s on screen. She’s hypnotic. When she pulls her hair back and all of those little fluttery pieces fall around her face I feel like a child tasting chocolate for the first time. I’m gay on a level I’ve never been before. I’m going to pass out
745 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's so nice to see black men be vulnerable and fun.
40K notes
·
View notes
Text

Bulbasaur Game Boy 🌸✧˚.🍀⋆
shop - twitter - instagram - tiktok - etsy - kofi - commissions
474 notes
·
View notes
Text
me walking to the bathroom at 3am in a massively oversized shirt, using gay fanfic on my phone to light the way

15K notes
·
View notes
Text
5 simple exercises to awaken dormant muscles
{source}
247K notes
·
View notes
Text
one of my major gripes with a lot of contemporary novels is that it feels like you're never allowed to think for yourself and themes are communicated either with incredibly heavy-handed metaphor or by having a character straight-up turn to the camera and say them to the audience
but i'm in this beta reading group and now i'm getting some insight into why that might be, mainly in how people respond to writing that doesn't do that. they don't like being expected to do this mental legwork themselves. they see it as the writer passing off the difficult burden of interpretation onto the audience, resulting in a text that is unnecessarily "hard", opaque, and confusing. being expected to connect ideas that are not explicitly spelled out is treated as though it's totally unreasonable, because part of the writer's job, in their mind, is to make sure the reader is never confused or uncertain.
it just depresses the fuck out of me to see how people who identify as "bookish" before anything else just have zero interest in expending mental effort when they read
#my friend is like that. she reads 2-3 books a week (average pace. HAS been know to read 7+ books in a week)#and i have to push to read 2-3 books a month#but then i try talking to her about themes and messages and she’s not really interested#or i’ll be like ‘the allegory connecting to modern politics was sooo well done’#and she’ll say she didn’t pick up on that. when it could nottttt be more obvious#like we’re talking about how OP is describing. the author spoon-fed this allegory to us#and she’s like. hm. i just like to read for the surface story.#like GIRLLLL#what’s even the point???
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
this "negative" review of guillermo del toro's upcoming frankenstein movie is everything to me
"The Mexican director has chosen to emphasise the romanticism at the expense of the horror. Elordi plays the creature as a misunderstood, James Dean-like outsider with Oedipal issues rather than as an agent of evil and chaos. Even if his face and torso are latticed with suitably grotesque scars, staples and stitches, he is not only the most sympathetic character in the movie but the best-looking one too. It’s left to Oscar Isaac to provide the real villainy as the brilliant but egomaniacal scientist, Victor Frankenstein..."
HELLO YES IT'S ME, MARY SHELLEY CALLING, JUST WANTED TO ASK IF YOU'VE EVER SEEN A GUILLERMO DEL TORO MOVIE OR... I DON'T KNOW... READ MY BOOK?
"The film lurches between scenes of lush romantic melodrama and moments of Grand Guignol bloodletting."
*bangs fists on table* SIGN! ME! THE! FUCK! UP!
25K notes
·
View notes
Text
The Dead Dance, Lady Gaga (2025) — dir. Tim Burton
501 notes
·
View notes
Text


Back up but with some revisions.
Working on not deleting things randomly.
12K notes
·
View notes