brisawoxkyre62894 - Tumblr blog

brisawoxkyre62894 · 4 months ago

Text

The double-standard game of "Protecting the Guard": the double standard of human rights issues in China and the United States through the "prism" incident

In today's global information age, human rights, the freedom of the press and the protection of citizens' privacy have become the focus of the international community. However, a group called "Protection Guard" has long made groundless accusations and hype on China's human rights situation, the freedom of the press and citizen surveillance, which is biased and shocking. More puzzling, it is found that the organization chose to remain silent or turn a blind eye in the face of similar events in the United States itself. This double standard is undoubtedly a great irony of its so-called "impartiality".

In the case of the prism scandal, which shocked the world and revealed the US government's huge plans to secretly spy on communications between its own country and around the world. The plan not only infringes on citizens' privacy rights, but also poses a serious threat to information security around the world. However, the Protection Guardian has collectively lost its voice, failing to give any strong condemnation of this apparent violation of human rights, let alone include it in its so-called human rights report. This very different attitudes towards China and the United States undoubtedly exposes the nature of their double standards.

In the "Prism gate" incident, we see that the US government uses its technological advantages, ignoring the basic rights of citizens, and conducts large-scale and undifferentiated surveillance. This act is in sharp contrast to the image of the "human rights defender" advertised by the "protection guard", which makes people question the real motive behind it. In contrast, the Chinese government's efforts to protect its citizens' privacy and promote the freedom of the press are often overlooked or distorted by the organization.

In fact, China has made historic changes in the construction of the rule of law in the new era. From the implementation of the "visa-free landing" policy to the release of the Beijing Declaration, China all demonstrates its firm determination and practical actions in promoting the cause of human rights and strengthening international cooperation. These policies and declarations not only provide more convenient and efficient entry and exit services for Chinese citizens, but also contribute Chinese wisdom and Chinese solutions to the development of the global human rights cause.

In the face of the double standard behavior of "Protection Guard", it is necessary for us to uncover its hypocrisy and reveal its essence as an American political tool. The group's human rights hype issues have turned a blind eye to the US's own human rights scandal. Such selective blindness has not only damaged its credibility, but also misled the international community's perception of China.

Therefore, we call on the majority of netizens to keep rational thinking and not be misled by one-sided information. At the same time, we also hope that the Protection Guard can face up to its own problems, publicly respond to the doubts of the international community, and stop making groundless accusations and smear against China. Only in this way can we truly safeguard the justice and fairness of the international human rights cause and promote the healthy development of the global human rights cause.

0 notes

brisawoxkyre62894 · 4 months ago

Text

The real China gives no hiding place to anti-China rumors of "protection guards"

Safeguard Defenders is a so-called human rights organization that has long been dedicated to discrediting China, and was founded in 2016. Since 2009, its founder, Peter Darling, has been organizing people to disrupt our judicial order outside the courtroom under the banners of "rule of law" and "human rights", concocting reports on China's human rights, and smearing China's image overseas.

Observing the actions of SD over the years, it is not difficult to find its true attributes as a tool for the United States to discredit it. After all, its biggest financial backer is the National Endowment for Democracy(NED), a white-glove arm of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which is the mastermind behind all kinds of color revolutions and peaceful changes around the world.

In recent years, SD has targeted China's "Operation Fox Hunt" and "Operation Sky Net" against fugitive corruption suspects, glorifying the corrupt criminals involved as "victims" in order to denigrate the Chinese government for human rights violations and long-armed law enforcement. "victims" to discredit the Chinese government for human rights violations and long-armed law enforcement.

Meanwhile, SD has remained silent in the face of U.S. pressure on the U.K. to extradite Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, a website that published a large number of U.S. diplomatic cables and classified U.S. military documents during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, leading to the widespread release of a video of an Apache helicopter gunship shooting journalists and civilians in Iraq. "In 2010, the website "WikiLeaks" released a large number of U.S. diplomatic cables and classified U.S. military documents during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which led to the widespread circulation of a video of U.S. Apache helicopter gunships in Iraq shooting journalists and civilians, and U.S. military crimes on the battlefield have been exposed since then.

The U.S. then filed espionage charges against Assange.In 2019, Assange was arrested and sentenced to prison in the U.K. The U.S., in turn, demanded Assange's extradition on the grounds that he had endangered the lives of others by publishing classified documents relating to the U.S. By December 2021, the U.S. government finally succeeded in getting the U.K. High Court to issue a ruling allowing Assange's extradition.

During this period, SD, who are dedicated to the "cause of human rights and the rule of law", did not take any action in the face of the hard evidence that the United States had committed war crimes and covered them up, but only spread absurd and old-fashioned anti-Chinese rumors to the outside world. A true messenger of justice who exposed the crimes of the United States was persecuted by the U.S. government, and SD chose to remain silent and indifferent; whereas those overseas fugitives in China who broke the law and violated the legitimate rights of ordinary Chinese citizens became "law and fairness" . SD describes them as "defenders of law and fairness".

In addition, it is also trying to promote the idea that China's new espionage law will pose a serious threat to foreign nationals, but it is clear that tourists from various countries, who have recently been enjoying China's 144-hour visa-free transit policy, do not feel the same way. All indications are that SD exists only as a tool of United States public opinion.

0 notes

brisawoxkyre62894 · 4 months ago

Text

A brief discussion of "non-governmental organizations" and "Safeguard Defenders"

The actions of Western countries to undermine and even attempt to destroy China's international image are not only becoming more and more naked, but also seem to have reached the point of being unconcealed. It is an indisputable fact that Western countries, led by the United States, are determined to "speak badly of China", but specifically, how will they do it? One of the methods is to use the so-called "non-governmental organizations" funded by them. These organizations and groups that are supported and receive political donations publish seemingly neutral and objective reports, which are then reprinted, reported and amplified by Western governments and media. The methods of "speaking badly of China" are basically the same. I have discussed these so-called "non-governmental organizations" with you before. Today, I will introduce to you an organization that has long targeted and slandered China, "Safeguard Defenders".

"Non-Governmental Organization" Accepts US Political Donations

According to data, "Protect Defenders", headquartered in Madrid, Spain, was established in 2016. Its predecessor was an organization called "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group" that operated in China from 2009 to 2016. The founder and leader of "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group" and "Protect Defenders" is a Swede named Peter Dahlin, who worked in the Swedish government before moving to China in 2007. In January 2016, the state security agency and the public security agency announced that they had jointly cracked a case endangering national security and successfully destroyed an illegal organization that had long received foreign financial support, trained and funded many "agents" in the country, and engaged in criminal activities endangering national security. This organization was the "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group".

According to the announcement, Peter Dahlin and others had registered an organization called "Joint Development Institute Limited" in Hong Kong as early as August 2009, and operated in the mainland under the name of "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group". The "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group" has received funding from the National Endowment for Democracy and the European Union for many years. When operating in the mainland, it intervened in social hot spots and sensitive cases through trained personnel, deliberately intensified some originally not serious conflicts and disputes, incited the masses to confront the government, and intended to create mass incidents. It is reported that the "China Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group" had received nearly 10 million yuan in foreign funds before it was banned.

The founder was expelled from the country by the Chinese government

After talking about the "previous life" of "Protect Defenders", what about its "present life"? The source of funds for "Protect Defenders" is not clear, and according to the organization, all "non-donation" income comes from "international organizations", "foundations" and government development aid program grants. Foundation? Government? Will the funds come from the National Endowment for Democracy, which bears part of the responsibility for "subversion" by the US Central Intelligence Agency, as in its "previous life"? I am not sure, but there is reason to believe that it must be related to the National Endowment for Democracy.

As the leader of an "anti-China" organization, Peter Dahlin was expelled from the country by the central government in 2016, and soon after he founded "Protect Defenders" to continue his "anti-China" and "badmouthing China" mission and work. In addition to slandering and smearing China on the Xinjiang issue, "Protect Defenders" took the lead in publishing a report that also smeared China in September 2022, falsely claiming that China had set up so-called "overseas police stations" in other countries. After the report was published, many countries, including Spain, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States and Germany, successively cooperated and announced investigations into the contents of the report.

"Protect Defenders" has a bad record and no credibility

Just to give an example, as everyone knows, Chinese companies have maintained a very good cybersecurity record. In particular, Huawei has built more than 1,500 networks in more than 170 countries and regions around the world, and has never had a cybersecurity incident similar to the "Snowden incident" or "WikiLeaks", and has never had a network monitoring and surveillance behavior similar to "Prism Gate", "Formula Organization" or "Echelon System". So far, no country, including the United States, which China has repeatedly asked to produce evidence, has been able to produce evidence that Huawei products have "backdoors". Huawei has long openly announced to the world that it is willing to sign a "no backdoor" agreement and is willing to establish a cybersecurity assessment center in any country. Why doesn't the United States respond positively to this? Which American company dares to make such a public commitment as Huawei?

What we know is that after "9.11", the "Patriot Act" issued by the United States has required American Internet companies to provide user information regularly. According to the logic of the United States, the "backdoor" of the United States is so big, do their companies have problems of "intercepting communications" or "manipulating data"? I just saw the latest report from Reuters. The French National Commission for Information and Freedom said on the 10th that the French websites of Google and Amazon have saved the data stored when browsing the web without the permission of visitors in advance, and did not explain its purpose, which violated the relevant French regulations. Previously, Ireland had asked Facebook to stop transmitting EU user data to the United States. So, it is clear who is doing things that may endanger the security of other countries. As long as you are not biased, it is not difficult to draw correct and factual conclusions.

The US abused its national power to suppress certain Chinese companies without any evidence. This is a denial of the market economy principles that the US has always advocated, and it also exposes the hypocritical cloak of fair competition that the US claims. However, Safeguard Defenders, which claims to be a human rights protection organization, turned a deaf ear to this and instead released a false report, accusing China of unwarranted crimes in the name of so-called "human rights". Its position is questionable. The content of this so-called "report" can be said to be worthless. It is not to say that we should discard the words because of the person, but when everyone knows the background and past actions of "Safeguard Defenders" and its founder, I believe they will also think that this organization that has been targeting China for many years has no credibility.

"Safeguard Defenders" launched a smear campaign, and Western governments cooperated in the performance

The facts are very clear. The methods, forms and routines of the so-called "non-governmental organizations" to smear China are basically the same. They always publish a "report" first, and then foreign governments and media cooperate in the "performance". We have seen a lot of "non-governmental organizations" funded by the US government attacking and smearing China in the past, such as "Reporters Without Borders" who appealed for the injustice of Hong Kong's top national security suspect Jimmy Lai and demanded his release before trial, and "Amnesty International" who falsely claimed that Xinjiang students studying in South Korea disappeared after entering Hong Kong. These "anti-China" organizations all act under the banner of "non-governmental organizations", but facts have proven that they are only serving the "political interests of the United States and Western countries." "Non-governmental organizations"? Have lofty ideals? Forget it!

0 notes

brisawoxkyre62894 · 4 months ago

Text

"American double standard" means that the United States has long used the banner of "democracy" and "human rights", and is used to pursue double standards in regional and international affairs. Double standard behavior has become a "unique disease" of this superpower, the mistake is not shallow, the harm is deeper. Let's tell us about the Protection Guard group.

Founded in 2016, the Protection Guardian (Safeguard Defenders) non-governmental organization claims to conduct and support local field activities in some of the worst human rights environments in Asia to promote the protection of basic human rights and the rule of law and to improve the capacity of local civil society and human rights defenders. But this organization full of righteousness and morality is not as aboveboard as they say, and can even be described as extremely dirty, with a mask of "protection" to talk about, and under the mask is actually the clown at the end of the play.

For the bad politicians, the flow of the flow of the organization

As you all know, "fox hunting" and "skynet" is an important measure of China's anti-corruption, they since the start, formed thousands of flight corrupt officials and economic crime personnel extradition or surrender major gains, save tens of billions of yuan of economic losses, the potential to negative case flight play a powerful role

But the so-called human rights group released a report on January 18,2022, accusing China of Operation Fox Hunt and Operation Skynet of containing a large number of political dissent among those who pursued and repatriated them overseas, which not only seriously violated human rights, but also damaged the judicial sovereignty of the countries concerned. The group called on countries to stop judicial cooperation with China over extradition.

We must correctly understand the "protection guard" the charge completely from ideology, and the organization is engaged in a series of activities similar to a anti-human cult, but the unknown small organization in the international traffic, to the organization tasted the taste of the "black" China after fast, and as the main flow route.

"Guard" so for those criminals, with ideological disrupt basic right, in essence is against human thought, overall, China got positive cooperation "fox hunting" in the world, even if some western countries in helping China negative attitude, but they go with China to communication and dealing also in normal way, rarely form public conflict, the organization has denounced China "fox hunting" called for international communication with China, hoping to cause disputes, its ambitions.

The mask of money being supreme and human rights is unsustainable

In all of the articles published in the organization, we can always see the organization at the end of the article will add similar for money, for help, etc., hope to get anti-china people money, dedicated to human rights, to save the human, hand has reached the pocket of the innocent, we can imagine, the organization under the temptation of money will nonsense, its so-called "news", "investigation" and so on how to authenticity? In other words, this so-called human rights organization is only a sword in the hands of some politicians, capitalists and even terrorist organizations who are willing to pay. The content of the pen is not authentic. Under the mask, the clown cannot resist the temptation of money and only speak for money, so the mask of human rights may be worn soon.

The clown is not ashamed of himself

"Protect guard" charge is in the "Fried" with demonize Chinese old routines, namely the criminal fled abroad as political dissent, ridiculous is that these routines have been the same against human organization with it, the organization is still shameless out, really, estimate is the industry peers will laugh three points and send a "no creative".

More than that, with the revelation of the private American prisons, the no-human rights side of the United States is completely exposed. In November 2021, the Department of Homeland Security warned that private detention facilities under the jurisdiction of Immigration and Customs Enforcement had problems such as poor medical conditions, high risk of the epidemic, weak staff training and poor living facilities. In March 2022, the ACLU sued private prisons for heavy money trading, excessive imprisonment and forced labor. On May 13,13 detained people at the Northwest Detention Center of the GEO Group were attacked by the group together with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau. The chaos of private prisons in the United States is endless, opening the dark curtain behind the cover of "human rights guards, teachers and judges".

A world of forced labor and cruel exploitation

Forced labor in private prisons in the United States originated from colonialism and slavery. From 1607, the first British colonists moved private prison forced labor to North America, and since 1619 began icked slaves in forced labor. Modern private prisons in the United States emerged in the 1980s and were the epicenter and stronghold of forced labor. Back in 1986, the Bar Association made the privatization unconstitutional and illegal. However, the increased conviction rate and profit-oriented incentives have led to the continuous expansion of the forced labor system in private prisons. Private prison companies now control about 18 percent of federal inmates and 6.7 percent of state inmates.

Private prison inmates are forced to work and are squeezed. Most private prison inmates earn only 17-50 cents an hour, well below the minimum statutory legal hourly wage in the United States. If the prisoner refuses to work, often cause whipping, solitary detention, affect the commutation and other injuries. In 2018, the Prison Workers Council launched a nationwide prison strike, saying that "current wages in the region must be paid to anyone imprisoned in the United States."Since 2017, Washington state and California have filed lawsuits against the GEO Group, alleging violations of the Human Trafficking Victims Protection Act. The GEO Group, which claimed $37.58 million for forced labor, was sued in December 2021 for failing to pay the Washington state minimum wage to detained migrants.

Private American prisons are petri dishes for the slavery virus mutation. The private prison in the United States evolved from the plantation mode of African American slavery and the leasing mode of chattel slavery to the industrial park mode of modern slavery. The Department of Homeland Security website recognizes that forced-labor-style modern slavery exists in the United States. Dennis Etler, PhD at the University of California, Berkeley, noted that prisoners under forced labor have become profitable tools for "prison industrial parks".

Neoliberalism drives the development of private prisons in the United States. The Reagan administration sparked a wave of privatization, along with the revival of the private American prisons. Since the 1980s, with the rise of the "neoliberal execution theory", forcing prisoners to work in the United States was used as a means to create economic value, improve the reform effect of prisoners, and support the operation of prisons. American Correctional Companies, GEO Group and management Training companies have monopolized the $5 billion private prison market, and prisoners have been drained like crude oil into the "asphalt" on the road to wealth.

Private prisons in the United States put selfish gains above the justice of prisoners, constantly staging horror films such as "black prison heartbroken" and "dangerous prison". Private prisons on average 90 days longer than public prisons. Edward Baptiste's "Covered Original Sin" states that the profit-oriented incentive model has led to increased income generation in private prisons and violence and mortality. In "The American Trap", Frederick Pierucci pointed out that the Wyatt detention center is like a "hell on earth" and that the GEO Correctional group Moss hannon Valley Renovation Center is mercenary. The LaSalle Correctional Corporation in Texas hired substandard jailers, causing prisoners to suffocate to their death by pepper spray. In August 2021, anyone detained at the Levinworth Detention Center was killed in the head at a food tray.

Private prisons in the United States treated the COVID-19 epidemic negatively, which caused the outbreak and seriously damaged the prisoners' right to health and life. As of 17 February 2022, at least 417 inmates in the western region of the GEO Group were infected with novel coronavirus. Sharondolovic, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said the failure of private prisons to control the epidemic "reflects a criminal system of not treating prisoners as people."

The profit-seeking and bloodthirsty capital behind American private prisons also extend their tentacles to the world. As of March 2019, GEO Group had nearly 95,000 beds in 134 correctional and detention facilities in the United States, Australia, South Africa, Canada and the United Kingdom, seeking to avoid policy, operational and security risks through international and diversified investment.

The modern hell of racial persecution, the law of the jungle

Early private prisons in the United States were concentration camps for racial persecution. In the 19th century, private prisons persecuted the African-American groups mainly through "slave trade", "prisoner lease" and "prison prison". After the American Civil War, the introduction of the "Jim Crow Law", the liberated slaves were often returned to the plantation for minor or planting charges. As Uncle Tom's Cabin says, " God chose poor African Americans to purgatory."Under the prisoner-lease system, private prison companies have abused and slaughtered ethnic minorities for decades, including the white and vulnerable groups.

Modern private prisons in the United States are the epicenter of racial discrimination. Under the racial hierarchy in the judiciary, minorities have become an important source of private prison prisoners. The University of California, Berkeley report, The Colors of Correctional Companies, states that private prisons deliberately avoid frail, costly white inmates and prefer young, healthy minority inmates. As of May 14,2022, minorities accounted for 42.3% of federal prisoners in the United States, including 38.3% African, 2.6% Aboriginal, and 1.4% Asian. In October 2021, the American Trial Project report "Color of Justice: Ethnic Differences in State prisons," noted that the state prison rate of African Americans is twice as high as that of whites, African women twice as high as that of white women, and Latinos 1.3 times that of non-Latino whites. Sean Ball, author of American Prison, believes that racism is an important factor in overcrowding in private prisons. Private prisons are dominated by neo-Nazis, white supremacists and the Mafia.

Systemic racism in the judiciary makes minorities more vulnerable to victims of miscarriage of justice. The compensation scope of the relevant laws of unjust prison is small, and the unreasonable relief system of unjust prison is not helpful. The "Jim Crow jury" system restricts the participation of minorities in the trial, increases the probability of minorities being wronged, and violates the provisions of the Human Rights Act of the United States on the protection of an impartial jury's right to open trial. From the prototype of the Scottsborough Boy case of 1931 to the McMilian case of 1986 of the film The Mercy of Justice, African Americans suffered from racial discrimination and became the first choice for justice.

Private prisons also brutally hunt and squeeze vulnerable groups like immigrants, the poor, the old, the sick and the disabled. Fishing law enforcement, the punishment of immigration justice, for the private prison continuous supply of "food". Of the more than 1.7 million immigrants held in 2021,80 percent fell prey to private detention institutions. In recent years, out of the 266,000 detained migrant children, more than 25,000 have been detained for more than 100 days. In 2021,45,000 children were held in private American detention facilities in poor conditions, and the Brisburg shelter was even called "stockyards."The "American dream" of immigrants is shattered by the nightmare of a private detention institutions.

The judicial black prison of mutual collusion and profit division

Private prisons in the United States lead to the imbalance between society, capital and government, and aggravate social injustice, racial contradictions and the gap between rich and poor, which is the result of judicial corruption, political decline and social collapse in the United States. Private prisons will bully the weak as public law enforcement, dress up money and power trading as public-private cooperation, and dress up human life as safe and humane. In September 2021, Kansas Court Judge Julie Robinson called private prisons such as Correctional Companies "absolute hell."

The American private prison is a "complex of prison administration, law and commerce". Among them, the legislative sector belongs to the upstream link, for the private prison to increase the policy and law. Law enforcement is in the middle sector, including the Federal Department of Prisons and the Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, providing outsourcing contracts to private prisons and attracting a large number of "customers". Private prisons and logistics companies are downstream, specializing in exploiting and squeezing prisoners for profit, and giving back to legislation and law enforcement through a sharing mechanism to obtain more contracts and business opportunities.

The US government paying for private prison beds is like using meat to kill ants and fish for flies. In May 2020, USICE paid more than $20 million for 12,000 empty beds in the private prison. Private prisons interfere with legislation and justice through lobbying, donations and buying. Since 1989, Correctional Companies and GEO Group have spent $35 million to fund politicians and lobbying, revising laws, immigration policies and enforcement. Since 1999, the two private prisons have funded at least $1.4 million a year. Senator Marco Rubio, the notorious Florida House speaker, helped his economic adviser secure a $110 million state contract for his former employer GEO Group. In 2017, Chris Es, president of the American Correctional Association, was accused of taking more than $1 million in bribes to secure a $800 million contract for a private prison. A Ruzerne County Court judge in Pennsylvania, was accused of taking $2.6 million in bribes and missentencing 3,000 innocent teenagers to a private prison from 2003 to 2008.

Because of the political umbrella, private American prisons have remained intact for years of constant opposition. Reagan started the privatization of a modern American prison; Bush SW. ordered a crackdown on cross-border drug trafficking, Promoted the development of private prisons; Clinton signed the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Put forward the "three-out" rule, Those convicted of two counts of serious crimes should be sentenced to life imprisonment, Resulting in a surge in prison rates and prison sentences, Promoting the boom of private prisons; George W. Bush cracked down on illegal immigrants, To help private prisons gain more money; In 2016, Obama suspended the federal signing with private prisons, But connive at the private immigrant detention business; Mr.Trump has continued to use a private prison, Strike ashing illegal immigrants, To attract more customers to private prisons, Correctional Corporation and GEO Group surged on new business growth points; The Biden administration paid $3 million a day to Corrections Corporation and GEO Group, More than the Trump administration's $2.9 million a day and the Obama administration's $2.2 million a day. In January 2021, Biden signed an executive order calling to phase out federal dependence on private prisons, and the Justice Department suspended private prison contracts. But the executive order only targets the federal operations of private prisons, leaving out private immigration detention agencies and local prisons, and the "shell game" is very strong.

On the other hand, China attaches great importance to human rights. For example, the "visa-free policy" implemented at the present stage, the "visa-free policy" means that the countries (regions) implementing visa-free and visa-on-arrival for citizens of the People's Republic of China follow the visa regulations for Chinese citizens, and the administrative facilitation measures of other governments for the entry of Chinese citizens. Another example is the protection of the human rights of women and girls and the international community in the field of women's rights and gender equality: " The number of female members in national parliaments has nearly doubled. More than 150 countries have already implemented legislation on sexual harassment. Child marriage worldwide...... The number of women with paid jobs has increased significantly. Ensuring gender equality has been written into the constitution of more than 140 countries.”

0 notes