andletsgocrazytogether
andletsgocrazytogether
And I'd marry you, Harry.
88K posts
Anne / Larrie / Philadelphia
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
andletsgocrazytogether · 22 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
92 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 22 days ago
Text
(hears a song lyric) this would make a great all-lower case fanfiction title
113K notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 22 days ago
Text
*larries harder*
101 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 22 days ago
Text
dont retreat emotionally. people like you and want you around. they like to talk to you, and you genuinely matter. you have to trust this through the hard times so you can get to the better times without sabotaging yourself. you are worth loving
29K notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 1 month ago
Note
Hi
I’ve noticed there’s a lot of debate about Harry’s career, and I wanted to ask what you think about it. Like, do you think he’s actually fully free when it comes to his career?
It seems like he’s gained a lot of creative freedom, and he’s pretty close to the CEO of Sony Music.
I get that at his level, there’s usually more control over artists, but it kind of looks like he’s managed to carve out some real freedom.
hey! oh my gosh anon, thank you for asking this in such a kind and respectful way. seriously. i’ve had this question come in before, but often phrased in ways that are really dismissive or degrading toward harry, and i try to avoid engaging with anything that tears them down for my own peace of mind. so i really appreciate the tone you brought to this ♥
there are definitely some great takes floating around from other blogs, but i’m happy to throw in my two cents too!
so — do i think harry is completely free in his career now?
short answer: no, not completely. but i do think he’s carved out a lot more freedom than he had in the past, especially creatively.
longer answer below if you're up for a read 👇
📄contract stuff 📄
when harry was 16, he was handed the same standard x-factor contract as the other contestants — and likely wasn’t allowed to seek outside opinion before signing. those contracts would’ve included clauses about not revealing anything that happened behind the scenes, letting the show dictate how their image and likeness are used, and (this one’s actually been confirmed by other contestants) never disparaging simon cowell. several former contestants have said they’re still under those NDAs — so at least parts of that original contract are probably still in effect.
and that’s just the beginning.
after x factor, 1d signed a recording contract with syco/sony (december 2010) for five albums and a set number of years. they fulfilled the album count, yes — but we don’t know what other clauses were baked into that deal. i’ve seen theories (and i tend to agree) that if three or more members are seen collaborating or photographed together, it can still trigger the 1D brand — which could reactivate image management clauses. and from what we know, syco/sony may still own their masters, unless that changed when the business entity was sold to universal in 2020 (though that didn’t seem to include the catalog).
they also renewed that contract in 2013, which again — no one outside their teams has seen the terms or end date. and then there's the US contract with columbia/sony (signed in 2011), which would’ve come with its own image rights clauses and restrictions.
now — harry himself has said that the first contract he saw without a “cleanliness clause” (sometimes called a morality clause) was his first solo deal with columbia. that tells us that every previous contract — from x factor to 1d — likely included one. and those clauses are serious. they’re basically designed to let the label (or management) protect their investment by controlling anything that might be seen as “damaging” to the artist’s public image or marketability.
if the artist breaks a clause — even unintentionally — the consequences can be massive: they can lose their deal, be forced to pay back everything that’s been invested in them (studio time, promo, tour costs), and in some cases even be sued for future losses — meaning the label can estimate what they would have made off you and demand that too.
so when people ask “why would they closet him?” — the answer is: because under a cleanliness clause, being openly gay could absolutely be labeled as ‘unsavory’ or ‘damaging’, especially in an industry built on selling a fantasy to teenage girls. back then, harry’s entire commercial value (to them) was tied to how desirable he was to a young, straight female audience. coming out — or even being perceived as queer — could have been framed as a threat to his marketability, and therefore a violation of the contract.
and we’re not talking small stakes — we’re talking about millions of dollars riding on his “image.” at that age, with that kind of power imbalance, it wouldn’t have been framed to him as a choice. it would’ve been: this is what you signed. this is the deal. this is how it works.
and just to expose myself a little — i’m actually really familiar with clauses like that. i’ve written them, i’ve signed them, i’ve seen them broken. they’re not just used in music — they show up in any industry where someone’s public image is monetized. are they outdated and kind of gross? yeah. but from a corporate risk perspective, they’re considered “standard.”
to give a non-music example: if J.K. Rowling had been under contract for five more books when she started making horrific comments about trans people, her publisher could’ve dropped her and sued her for all the money they lost out on because of her public behavior. so — yeah. sometimes those clauses are used to protect people, but they can also be used to control them.
🌟 current day 🌟
based on what little we know, i personally believe that harry fulfilled his first solo contract — which i think was for three albums (HS1, Fine Line, Harry’s House). that deal may have been better than what he had before, but he was still just starting out as a solo artist. he probably didn’t have the leverage (or confidence) yet to push for a deal that was completely in his favor. the label was taking a risk on him — he could’ve flopped. and i think he knew that too. none of the industry people could’ve predicted just how massive he’d become. (okay, we could’ve, but still.)
and here’s where i’ll expose another opinion: i fully believe that part of that solo deal — or jeff’s strategy — was to intentionally distance harry from the 1D brand, and from all the members. not because he doesn’t care about them, but because the narrative around him needed to be “solo star harry styles,” not “harry from one direction.”
that’s why we didn’t see him publicly with any of them for years. remember when he went to louis’ xfactor performance in 2016? there was a photo of him with steve aoki. and then a separate photo of louis, liam, and niall with steve. but no photo of all of them together. no photo of harry with any of them (the closest we got was in AOTV - and everyone says "thank you Louis"). that’s not a coincidence.
even if i didn’t believe in larry (which i do), i’d still believe that the public friendships within the band were intentionally regulated for years. not because they weren’t real, but because they weren’t allowed to be seen.
🌈 freedom, but with limits 🌈
i also have a little (okay, a lot) of suspicion that part of the break harry was on was being used to renegotiate whatever his contract looks like now. but it's too early to see any of the effects of that.
to me, he’s as open as he can be — with the original restrictions still in place.
i don’t believe he can confirm his sexuality. i don’t believe he can say he was closeted. i don’t believe any of them can tell us the full truth about how bad things were — or what really happened behind the scenes.
he has signifigant control over his music. he has some control over his image. and he has more say now than he ever did before. but he’s still walking a very careful line, and i think that’s why he’s known for only doing interviews with pre-approved questions. not because he’s trying to be mysterious and "diva" about it — but because he literally can’t afford to say the wrong thing.
there’s a constant push and pull with his public image. and honestly? i think he’s handling it with a lot of grace.
💬 final thoughts 💬
i really, really hope that someday he (and the others) can be more open. and i think he hopes that too, based on the way he changes lyrics live (golden, 2022, coachella. "i'm hoping someday i can be open") and the quiet ways he pushes boundaries.
but for now? no — i don’t think harry is as free as people assume he is. he has more freedom than he used to, but he’s still navigating a system that was built to control him.
and while i’m here — neither is jade (even if she’s running a simon hate campaign in her music - the illusion of freedom is there for her without actually confirming anything), and definitely not louis (who has signed even more contracts with syco/simon even after the band). or the rest of them, really. they’re all still carrying the weight of the contracts they signed when they were teens, and the machine that came with it.
there are people trying to fix that — former contestants, people who were mistreated by simon, by itv, by x factor. but so far, no real structural change seems to have happened.
thanks again for the thoughtful ask, anon 🫶
171 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 1 month ago
Text
god am I the only one who has vivid nightmares about that one time Louis admitted that he has the tendency to be emotional when he’s had a few drinks??? :(
Louis:  I cried on Zayn, and it wasn’t that long ago. I can’t remember what I was upset about now ‘cause I was tipsy.
??? ? ? ? ??? ? ? ??????? ? ? ?
What about the other boys, is there anyone else who’s a little bit sensitive? Louis: [smiles sheepishly] I’m a big crier, actually. Would you cry in a movie? Louis: Yeah, I am bad for that…
the least painful thing is when I think about the fact that he’s a self-proclaimed crier crier who gets emotional in front of his boys often enough that they have a name for it
Liam:  Louis had a cry on me once. When he starts to get really upset, he makes this face. We call it ‘Louis’ cry face’. Louis:  It was at a time when I was crying properly and because I was embarrassed, I pulled a sad puppy dog face.
file under: things we super certainly don’t talk about
Tumblr media Tumblr media
long story short if I ever have to see Louis shed a tear I will probably pack up ship and move to another planet or seek out a new solar system altogether
12K notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
357 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
You just know Louis was immediately choosing to go to night 1 of the Oasis tour not just for the excitement but also *just in case* any disagreements should occur for the Gallagher brothers along the way.
73 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Louis with Noah Beck and his parents at Soccer Aid. (15 June 2025)
x
83 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
77K notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Louis’ full interview for Soccer Aid. (15 June 2025)
91 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
👬👭🌈
5K notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
141 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Louis with fans at Glastonbury! (26 June 2025)
x
44 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Louis with a fan at Glastonbury - 26.06
46 notes · View notes
andletsgocrazytogether · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
661 notes · View notes