yyuryyubicuryy4me

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Alaska State Office Building, Juneau

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Via Antonio Labriola, Naples.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

the illusion of choice

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Liz Toohey-Wiese, 2024.

"A sign installed in the largest wildfire burn I’ve ever seen, along the BC/YK border. Borrowing the aesthetics of BC Recreation Site signs, once again pointing to the overlaps of outdoor recreation, resource extraction, and the consequences of the climate crisis. Most recreation sites in BC exist along previously built logging and mining roads.

“Forced into a great and difficult transformation” was a line I heard in a lecture on Buddhist philosophy I was listening to on my drive up north. But it became another mantra I thought about while living in a place that’s been utterly transformed by resource extraction over the past century, and as I thought about the burnt landscapes I drove through."

More here.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

becoming so queer you can't bear to explain it

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Molfetta

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

James Owens - Pink Pink Pink Moon, 2022

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Yuan Fang (Chinese, 1996), Tickling II, 2023. Acrylic and spray paint on canvas, 220 x 170.2 cm.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Pedro Coronel (Mexican, 1922-1985), Sin título [Untitled], 1978. Oil and sand on canvas, 199.6 x 100 cm.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Cindy Sherman Untitled #311 [Horror and Surrealist Pictures] 1994

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Easy by Joanna Newsom from the album Have One On Me.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

Gan Chin Lee (Malaysian, 1977), Status Anxiety VI, 2010. Oil on canvas, 152.5 x 106 cm.

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

(taken from a post about AI)

speaking as someone who has had to grade virtually every kind of undergraduate assignment you can think of for the past six years (essays, labs, multiple choice tests, oral presentations, class participation, quizzes, field work assignments, etc), it is wild how out-of-touch-with-reality people’s perceptions of university grading schemes are. they are a mass standardised measurement used to prove the legitimacy of your degree, not how much you’ve learned. Those things aren’t completely unrelated to one another of course, but they are very different targets to meet. It is standard practice for professors to have a very clear idea of what the grade distribution for their classes are before each semester begins, and tenure-track assessments (at least some of the ones I’ve seen) are partially judged on a professors classes’ grade distributions - handing out too many A’s is considered a bad thing because it inflates student GPAs relative to other departments, faculties, and universities, and makes classes “too easy,” ie, reduces the legitimate of the degree they earn. I have been instructed many times by professors to grade easier or harder throughout the term to meet those target averages, because those targets are the expected distribution of grades in a standardised educational setting. It is standard practice for teaching assistants to report their grade averages to one another to make sure grade distributions are consistent. there’s a reason profs sometimes curve grades if the class tanks an assignment or test, and it’s generally not because they’re being nice!

this is why AI and chatgpt so quickly expanded into academia - it’s not because this new generation is the laziest, stupidest, most illiterate batch of teenagers the world has ever seen (what an original observation you’ve made there!), it’s because education has a mass standard data format that is very easily replicable by programs trained on, yanno, large volumes of data. And sure the essays generated by chatgpt are vacuous, uncompelling, and full of factual errors, but again, speaking as someone who has graded thousands of essays written by undergrads, that’s not exactly a new phenomenon lol

I think if you want to be productively angry at ChatGPT/AI usage in academia (I saw a recent post complaining that people were using it to write emails of all things, as if emails are some sacred form of communication), your anger needs to be directed at how easily automated many undergraduate assignments are. Or maybe your professors calculating in advance that the class average will be 72% is the single best way to run a university! Who knows. But part of the emotional stakes in this that I think are hard for people to admit to, much less let go of, is that AI reveals how rote, meaningless, and silly a lot of university education is - you are not a special little genius who is better than everyone else for having a Bachelor’s degree, you have succeeded in moving through standardised post-secondary education. This is part of the reason why disabled people are systematically barred from education, because disability accommodations require a break from this standardised format, and that means disabled people are framed as lazy cheaters who “get more time and help than everyone else.” If an AI can spit out a C+ undergraduate essay, that of course threatens your sense of superiority, and we can’t have that, can we?

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

[yyuryyubicuryy4me]

so tired of hearing abt ppl's inner children. Abort that thang