She/her --- Queer --- Rat-adj EA --- Assigned Aries by Frank @nostalgebraist-autoresponder
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
cursed number notation. can you figure it out
1 = []
2 = [[]]
3 = [][[]]
4 = [[[]]]
12 = [[[]]][[]]
0 =
-1 = -[]
19 = [][][][][][][][[]]
20 = [[[]]][][[]]
-2 = -[[]]
1/2 = [-[]]
sqrt(2) = [[-[]]]
72^1/6 = [[-[]]][[][-[]]]
5/4 = [-[[]]][][[]]
#haha solved it!#that's very clever#math#(careful in the notes if coming into this fresh; there's some discussion of the solution)
112 notes
·
View notes
Text
woke up this morning, rolled over, and very confidently tried to blow out my alarm clock like a candle. absolutely no precedent for that.
196K notes
·
View notes
Text
i love how increasingly abstract the concept of “maid” has gotten
785 notes
·
View notes
Text
if a number divided by itself is always equal to 1, surely this holds true for 0/0 as well
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
“Bat swinging at wasp nest” post but I cannot be nice about astrology people. No you did not find the one good or cute or quirky way to believe the quality of someone’s character is biologically pre-determined. Just because you found a way to not base it on race or ethnicity or gender does not make judging someone’s character on an innate and uncontrolled attribute suddenly teehee fine.
I’m even more baffled by the people going “it’s just fun!” “It’s just a hobby!!” Sure if it was something harmless. It’s not. We are quite literally talking about how you intend to judge, treat, view, respect, and interact with someone entirely differently based on an inherent trait. How are you not aghast? How are you not embarrassed? Why are you so insistent on needing to operate on a hierarchy of pre-determined character judgement?
#endorsed#shot dog coefficient gonna be high with this one#and it's less charitable than I usually am#but it's true
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
Boyfriend and I are walking home from friend’s place. We pass a group of people walking in the opposite direction.
One of the people in the group stops and says to us “Hey! Did you guys happen to see a guy dressed like a chicken?”
We tell him we have not.
He says “oh, okay” and, with no further context given, continues walking with his group.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Here's a legal PSA:
If you've committed a crime and a detective gathers everyone involved in the room, especially if he's not actually a detective and is instead a novelist, puzzle-setter, psychic, fake psychic, dog, chess grandmaster, etc. ...
YOU SHOULD NOT CONFESS.
Every year, hundreds of people are put away by non-traditional "detectives" who have either inserted themselves into the case or are working with the police in a dubiously legal capacity as advisor. In 99% of these cases, the murderer gives a full confession even though the evidence against them is circumstantial at best and often requires a long just-so story which can only guess at motive.
If this happens to you, stay quiet, do not attempt to defend yourself or talk your way out of it, only say "I want a lawyer".
Now if you find yourself being investigated by a boy genius, magician's assistant, anthropologist, classics scholar, or philosopher, it's likely that refusing to talk to the police (or investigator with no legal authority) is merely the end of the second act, and by the end of the third act they will have you dead to rights.
YOU SHOULD STILL NOT CONFESS.
Make them take it to court. Force the eccentric detective and his straight-laced police partner to take the stand and explain their methods to a jury of your peers. Have your lawyer look at the chain of custody on the evidence, especially if you believe it to have been handled by someone who has only bumbled into detective work through their natural charm and/or unique set of skills and outsider perspective that come in handy more often than they should.
Know your rights. Don't let eccentric detectives put you away.
#amazing#this is very good advice for all y'all mystery novel characters out there#innocent until proven guilty and your honor a logic puzzle is not proof#never confess never surrender
15K notes
·
View notes
Text
"That's right, Captain Heroname! I have you at my mercy! For after countless hours of research and development, I, Doctor Villainous, have managed to miniaturize the disintegration cannon that destroyed City Hall! And you were foolish enough to come here unarmed, thinking you were safe from my evil genius! Now- don't move, or Jane Loveinterest gets it!"
"...A compact disintegrator?"
"Yes! And with it, I will--"
"Isn't that just a little derivative?"
38 notes
·
View notes
Text
This made me laugh. At least he’s honest about how awful he is.
16K notes
·
View notes
Note
yo!!! you did a killer SU AMV a while back with Contact Redux but it looks like youtube took it down (rip sorry dude) is there still a version floating around somewhere? thx m8
Just moved all my music videos off the ancient laptop they used to be on, so I finally can actually answer this ask. Also thank you! I'm very proud of it. THEY'RE ALIENS, STEVEN!!! ALIENS WHO INVADED EARTH!!
((The song is Contact (Redux) by Trocadero))
#!!! yessss this still exists and I finally found it#su#steven universe#I can't lose track of this again it's so so good#video
443 notes
·
View notes
Text
i hate viruses so fucking much. literally getting attacked by a fucking shape. a concept. consumes no energy. responds to no stimuli. its only existence is to fuck with you. like fuck offf
43K notes
·
View notes
Note
Ok first of all, the MTG game state doesn't just need the TPC to be true, it also needs a way to generate arbitrarily large twin primes, which I seriously doubt will ever happen. I'm not sure I understand your objection but Alice can't simply pick a larger prime number than Bob's number: He can respond (once) by reducing her number by 1, making it composite and her card doesn't work if it's composite. She can however, reduce her number by 1 also, making it prime again/the smaller twin prime.
My objection is that in a game, it sounds as if the players need to designate specific numbers. I'm no mathematician, but I don't think finding out whether a specific number is still prime when you do stuff to it proves stuff about all numbers.
#amazing#math#mtg#I love this so much despite not knowing much MTG#what a way for the game to be XD#those judges are Very Good
82 notes
·
View notes
Text
84K notes
·
View notes
Text
Despite or perhaps because of her best efforts (trying to eat my weaving notebook) I got the warp maths wrong by an order of magnitude in at least two places, but it's fine, it's fine it's fine
#!!!#art#humanity fuck yeah#oh wow people make things like this every day and have been for millennia and that's hitting me hard at this moment
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Love this so much
22K notes
·
View notes