Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Statistics
We looked inside some of the posts by xtours and here's what we found interesting.
Average Info
Notes Per Post
0
Likes Per Post
0
Reblog Per Post
0
Reply Per Post
0
Time Between Posts
16 days ago
Number of Posts By Type
Photo
17
Last Seen Tumblr Blogs
Fun Fact
In February 2021, Tumblr had 518.6 million blog accounts.
Photo
Expanding Privileges in Bulgaria
Growth of Privileges for the Elite
The system of privileges in Bulgaria extends beyond just the Communist Party members; it also includes their blood relatives, down to the third degree, and even those related by marriage. This expansion of privileges seems contrary to the laws of fairness and equality. Surprisingly, the number of “active fighters against fascism and capitalism” continues to grow until 1989. By the end of the 1970s, this group reaches around 200,000 members, highlighting the increasing disparity between the elite and the general population.
The Elite Class
On 9 February 1960, the British Embassy in Sofia submitted a report that highlighted the privileged status granted to citizens loyal to the communist regime. The report stated, “In fact, in Bulgaria, there is an elite whose standard of living is at least ten times higher than that of the common man.” This stark contrast illustrates how the ruling party enjoyed a vastly improved quality of life while the majority of citizens struggled to meet basic needs.
Privileges of the Elite
These privileges for the elite class included access to luxury goods, better housing, and exclusive medical care. Members of this privileged group enjoyed a lifestyle that was unattainable for most Bulgarians. While ordinary citizens faced long lines for basic necessities, the elite had access to high-quality goods and services, further emphasizing the inequality in society Jeep Safari Bulgaria.
The Impact of Privilege
The growing gap between the elite and the average citizen created widespread resentment among the population. Many felt excluded from the benefits that were only available to a select few. This dissatisfaction contributed to a climate of unrest that would eventually lead to calls for reform and change within the country.
A Personal Note
The impact of the regime’s oppression can be seen in personal stories as well. For example, Georgi Zarkin, a poet, journalist, and political prisoner, was murdered in prison for his dissent against the government. His New Year greeting to his son serves as a poignant reminder of the personal costs of the regime’s actions.
The privileges awarded to a small group in Bulgaria created an environment of inequality and dissatisfaction. As the number of privileged individuals grew, so did the frustrations of ordinary citizens. This situation set the stage for future protests and movements aimed at restoring basic human rights and freedoms in Bulgaria. Ultimately, the privileges enjoyed by the elite highlighted the systemic issues within the communist regime, which would need to be addressed for any real change to occur.
0 notes
Photo
Expanding Privileges in Bulgaria
Growth of Privileges for the Elite
The system of privileges in Bulgaria extends beyond just the Communist Party members; it also includes their blood relatives, down to the third degree, and even those related by marriage. This expansion of privileges seems contrary to the laws of fairness and equality. Surprisingly, the number of “active fighters against fascism and capitalism” continues to grow until 1989. By the end of the 1970s, this group reaches around 200,000 members, highlighting the increasing disparity between the elite and the general population.
The Elite Class
On 9 February 1960, the British Embassy in Sofia submitted a report that highlighted the privileged status granted to citizens loyal to the communist regime. The report stated, “In fact, in Bulgaria, there is an elite whose standard of living is at least ten times higher than that of the common man.” This stark contrast illustrates how the ruling party enjoyed a vastly improved quality of life while the majority of citizens struggled to meet basic needs.
Privileges of the Elite
These privileges for the elite class included access to luxury goods, better housing, and exclusive medical care. Members of this privileged group enjoyed a lifestyle that was unattainable for most Bulgarians. While ordinary citizens faced long lines for basic necessities, the elite had access to high-quality goods and services, further emphasizing the inequality in society Jeep Safari Bulgaria.
The Impact of Privilege
The growing gap between the elite and the average citizen created widespread resentment among the population. Many felt excluded from the benefits that were only available to a select few. This dissatisfaction contributed to a climate of unrest that would eventually lead to calls for reform and change within the country.
A Personal Note
The impact of the regime’s oppression can be seen in personal stories as well. For example, Georgi Zarkin, a poet, journalist, and political prisoner, was murdered in prison for his dissent against the government. His New Year greeting to his son serves as a poignant reminder of the personal costs of the regime’s actions.
The privileges awarded to a small group in Bulgaria created an environment of inequality and dissatisfaction. As the number of privileged individuals grew, so did the frustrations of ordinary citizens. This situation set the stage for future protests and movements aimed at restoring basic human rights and freedoms in Bulgaria. Ultimately, the privileges enjoyed by the elite highlighted the systemic issues within the communist regime, which would need to be addressed for any real change to occur.
0 notes
Photo
Death Sentences by the People's Tribunal
The Bulgarian People’s Tribunal was notorious for its harsh judgments and high number of death sentences. It executed 150 members of the supreme state authorities, a stark contrast to the International Nuremberg Tribunal, which sentenced 11 people to death, and the Far Eastern International Tribunal, which sentenced 7.
On 3 July 1945, the chief prosecutor reported to the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party that the People’s Tribunal had conducted 132 trials with the following outcomes:
– Death Sentences**: 2,816 sentences were handed down, with 2,700 actually carried out. – Life Imprisonment**: 1,233 sentences. – 20 Years Confinement**: 11 sentences. – 15 Years Confinement**: 964 sentences. – 12 Years Confinement**: 41 sentences. – 10 Years Confinement**: 687 sentences. – 8-7-6 Years Confinement**: 197 sentences. – 5 Years Confinement**: 1,006 sentences. – 3 Years Confinement**: 379 sentences. – 2 Years Confinement**: 318 sentences. – 1 Year Confinement**: 724 sentences. – 1 Year Probation**: 668 sentences. – Acquittals**: 1,485 cases. – Stopped and Suspended Trials**: 386 cases.
Suppression of Opposition Parties
The suppression of political opposition began as early as November 1944, with the first signs of conflict between the communists and other parties in the government dominated by the Fatherland Front.
In response to pressure from the Allied Control Committee, the Bulgarian government postponed the parliamentary elections scheduled for 26 August 1945. This delay was a significant early victory for the opposition parties against the communist dictatorship.
Political Parties in Legal Opposition
Several political parties were legally active during this period:
– Bulgarian Agrarian People’s Union**: Led by Nikola Petkov, with the party newspaper “People’s Agrarian Banner.” – Bulgarian Social Democratic Party**: Headed by Kosta Lulchev, with the party newspaper “Free Nation.” – Democratic Party**: Chaired by Nikola Moushanov and Alexander Ghirghinov, with the party newspaper “Zname” (Banner). – Radical Party**: Included in the broader opposition. – Independent Intellectuals’ Opposition Group**: Led by Professor Petko Stainov Istanbul Tour Guide.
Crackdown on Opposition
In early June 1946, leaders of the Bulgarian Communist Party visited Moscow and received directives to intensify the communization of Bulgaria and eliminate political opposition.
The Bulgarian Social Democratic Party was one of the first targets. On 26 June 1946, Krustyo Pastuhov, the leader of the party, was arrested, sentenced to 5 years in prison, and subsequently killed by strangulation while in custody. Tzvetan Ivanov, the editor of the Social Democratic Party’s newspaper “Free Nation,” was also arrested during this crackdown.
The actions of the People’s Tribunal and the suppression of opposition parties highlight the intense and often brutal measures taken by the Bulgarian Communist Party to consolidate power and eliminate any threats to their control. The high number of death sentences and the systematic dismantling of political opposition are emblematic of the repressive tactics used to enforce the new regime’s authority and suppress dissent.
0 notes
Photo
Death Sentences by the People's Tribunal
The Bulgarian People’s Tribunal was notorious for its harsh judgments and high number of death sentences. It executed 150 members of the supreme state authorities, a stark contrast to the International Nuremberg Tribunal, which sentenced 11 people to death, and the Far Eastern International Tribunal, which sentenced 7.
On 3 July 1945, the chief prosecutor reported to the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party that the People’s Tribunal had conducted 132 trials with the following outcomes:
– Death Sentences**: 2,816 sentences were handed down, with 2,700 actually carried out. – Life Imprisonment**: 1,233 sentences. – 20 Years Confinement**: 11 sentences. – 15 Years Confinement**: 964 sentences. – 12 Years Confinement**: 41 sentences. – 10 Years Confinement**: 687 sentences. – 8-7-6 Years Confinement**: 197 sentences. – 5 Years Confinement**: 1,006 sentences. – 3 Years Confinement**: 379 sentences. – 2 Years Confinement**: 318 sentences. – 1 Year Confinement**: 724 sentences. – 1 Year Probation**: 668 sentences. – Acquittals**: 1,485 cases. – Stopped and Suspended Trials**: 386 cases.
Suppression of Opposition Parties
The suppression of political opposition began as early as November 1944, with the first signs of conflict between the communists and other parties in the government dominated by the Fatherland Front.
In response to pressure from the Allied Control Committee, the Bulgarian government postponed the parliamentary elections scheduled for 26 August 1945. This delay was a significant early victory for the opposition parties against the communist dictatorship.
Political Parties in Legal Opposition
Several political parties were legally active during this period:
– Bulgarian Agrarian People’s Union**: Led by Nikola Petkov, with the party newspaper “People’s Agrarian Banner.” – Bulgarian Social Democratic Party**: Headed by Kosta Lulchev, with the party newspaper “Free Nation.” – Democratic Party**: Chaired by Nikola Moushanov and Alexander Ghirghinov, with the party newspaper “Zname” (Banner). – Radical Party**: Included in the broader opposition. – Independent Intellectuals’ Opposition Group**: Led by Professor Petko Stainov Istanbul Tour Guide.
Crackdown on Opposition
In early June 1946, leaders of the Bulgarian Communist Party visited Moscow and received directives to intensify the communization of Bulgaria and eliminate political opposition.
The Bulgarian Social Democratic Party was one of the first targets. On 26 June 1946, Krustyo Pastuhov, the leader of the party, was arrested, sentenced to 5 years in prison, and subsequently killed by strangulation while in custody. Tzvetan Ivanov, the editor of the Social Democratic Party’s newspaper “Free Nation,” was also arrested during this crackdown.
The actions of the People’s Tribunal and the suppression of opposition parties highlight the intense and often brutal measures taken by the Bulgarian Communist Party to consolidate power and eliminate any threats to their control. The high number of death sentences and the systematic dismantling of political opposition are emblematic of the repressive tactics used to enforce the new regime’s authority and suppress dissent.
0 notes
Photo
The Marriage and Controversy of King Alexander and Queen Draga
A Surprise Announcement
Amidst speculation about his marital prospects, King Alexander seemingly agreed to marry a German princess, leaving the arrangements to his father, Milan, and Emperor Francis Joseph of Austria. However, Alexander surprised everyone by marrying Draga instead.
Public Outcry
The Serbs, initially indifferent to Alexander’s romantic affairs, were outraged by his marriage to Draga, whom they viewed unfavorably. Rumors circulated about Draga’s past, tarnishing her reputation and fueling public animosity towards her. Regardless of the king’s actions, Draga was often blamed.
Ambition and Intrigue
Behind her royal title, Draga was a woman with ambitions, seeking to elevate her family’s status and secure a succession plan favoring her bloodline. Speculation arose about her purported pregnancy, but subsequent medical examinations dismissed it as impossible. Yet, rumors persisted, suggesting collusion between Draga and her sister to present a false heir Tour Bulgaria.
Growing Discontent
As tales of intrigue spread, discontent simmered among the Serbian populace. Many felt that Alexander and Draga had overstayed their welcome and must be removed from power. However, exile was the extent of the contemplated action, reflecting a desire for change without resorting to drastic measures.
A Tumultuous Era
The marriage of King Alexander and Queen Draga marked a tumultuous period in Serbian history, characterized by scandal, intrigue, and public outcry. Amidst accusations and rumors, the people of Serbia harbored growing discontent, signaling the need for change in their leadership.
0 notes
Photo
A Tranquil Journey to Avrat-Alan
Refreshing Change of Pace
The journey to Avrat-Alan on horseback offered a welcome reprieve from the jolting discomforts of a Turkish carriage traversing uneven roads. As we ascended into the mountains, a refreshing coolness enveloped us, accompanied by the inviting embrace of dense woodland canopies that provided respite from the relentless sun.
Idyllic Surroundings
Nature’s symphony unfolded around us, with bubbling streams emerging playfully from hidden nooks, reminiscent of joyful children rushing into the arms of their mothers. We found ourselves lingering leisurely in grassy clearings, where our horses indulged in the lush greenery, their contentment compelling us to delay our journey Private Guide Turkey.
Scenic Vistas
Upon reaching the summit of the foothills of the Balkans, we were treated to a breathtaking panorama. Stretching before us lay the vast expanse of the Maritza valley, home to Tatar Bazardjik, Philippopolis, and Adrianople. The eye wandered over miles of undulating plains, culminating in the majestic sweep of the Balkan foothills, delineating the boundary between the Maritza River and the Aegean Sea.
A Journey of Tranquility
Our horseback journey to Avrat-Alan not only provided a serene escape from the clamor of civilization but also bestowed upon us the gift of unparalleled natural beauty. Amidst the tranquil embrace of mountain breezes and verdant forests, we found solace and rejuvenation, cherishing each moment of our leisurely expedition.
0 notes
Photo
Ceremonial Attire
Upon reaching the Grand Vizier’s palace, the Admiral was first dressed in brocaded fur, followed by the Chief Secretaries, the religious leader, and the Governor of Istanbul, who were each adorned in large-sleeved sable furs.
Honors and Traditions
Kaymakam Pasha then visited the Hall of Audience, where he received greetings and applause. Following tradition, high officials were adorned in robes of honor (caftans) according to a protocol read by the Minister of Finance Istanbul Fun Tours.
Noble Mandate
A noble mandate was issued to the Grand Vizier’s Palace on the day after the Imperial Accession to announce that the Valide Sultan (Queen Mother) of Sultan Selim III would honor the New Imperial Palace (Topkapi Palace) by visiting from the Ancient Palace in Beyazit on the 15th day of the month. Additionally, it was noted that the Bairam ceremonial parades on the 17th day had been recorded in protocol books.
Tradition of Burials
Most Ottoman Sultans not only ascended the throne but also followed ancient protocol by being buried in tombs. This tradition symbolized the transition from one Sultan’s reign to another, highlighting the cycle of succession and continuity.
Symbolism of the Throne
The golden throne placed before the Gate of Happiness served as a symbol of magnificence for one Sultan’s reign while marking the solemn departure of another Sultan into eternity, all within a span of a few hours.
Sultan Selim III’s Challenges
Sultan Selim III, known for his reformist tendencies and openness to novelty, faced challenges in implementing reforms, particularly in modernizing the army and navigating relationships with Western powers amidst the backdrop of historical traditions and resistance to change.
0 notes
Photo
Events During the Fortification Efforts
Incidents During the Fortification
Throughout the ten days of constructing the earthwork fortifications, several incidents occurred, highlighting the tension and resistance against authority. Initially, when two tax-collectors approached the area, they were met with demands to surrender their weapons. Upon refusal, they were fired upon and killed. These tax-collectors, although not official government officers, represented the despised tax farmer, contributing to the animosity of the villagers due to their exploitative practices.
Subsequent Confrontations
Shortly after the altercation with the tax-collectors, seven more Turks approached the village and were promptly ordered to surrender. They complied, and the group, comprising two zaptiehs, two tax-collectors, one clerk, and two Pomaks (Mohammedan Bulgarians), were held in a Bulgarian house. Despite being detained, they were treated well, except for one zaptieh who was deemed to have committed acts of cruelty and was consequently sentenced to death and executed Bulgaria Tours.
Capture of a Carriage
A few days later, a closed carriage approached the fortifications along the road and was commanded to surrender. Ignoring the demand, the occupants attempted to flee and were met with gunfire. The carriage was seized, revealing two men and three women inside. Tragically, two men and one woman were killed in the exchange of fire. Another woman, in a desperate attempt to defend herself, grabbed a sabre and struck at one of the insurgents, resulting in her death. The surviving woman was captured but treated well until the arrival of Turkish forces, upon which she was released.
Limited Casualties Caused by Insurgents
According to available information, these incidents resulted in the deaths of only two women at the hands of the insurgents. However, one of these deaths was accidental, highlighting the chaotic nature of the confrontations. Contrary to claims by Turkish authorities in Philippopolis, who reported a higher death toll of twelve, concrete evidence supporting these claims is lacking, leading to skepticism from observers like Mr. Schuyler.
The events surrounding the fortification efforts were marked by confrontations and violence, reflecting the simmering tensions between the villagers and representatives of authority. While resistance was evident, casualties were limited, with most incidents arising from clashes during attempts to disarm or apprehend individuals. Skepticism regarding official casualty figures underscores the need for further investigation and verification of claims made by both sides involved in the conflict.
0 notes
Photo
Events During the Fortification Efforts
Incidents During the Fortification
Throughout the ten days of constructing the earthwork fortifications, several incidents occurred, highlighting the tension and resistance against authority. Initially, when two tax-collectors approached the area, they were met with demands to surrender their weapons. Upon refusal, they were fired upon and killed. These tax-collectors, although not official government officers, represented the despised tax farmer, contributing to the animosity of the villagers due to their exploitative practices.
Subsequent Confrontations
Shortly after the altercation with the tax-collectors, seven more Turks approached the village and were promptly ordered to surrender. They complied, and the group, comprising two zaptiehs, two tax-collectors, one clerk, and two Pomaks (Mohammedan Bulgarians), were held in a Bulgarian house. Despite being detained, they were treated well, except for one zaptieh who was deemed to have committed acts of cruelty and was consequently sentenced to death and executed Bulgaria Tours.
Capture of a Carriage
A few days later, a closed carriage approached the fortifications along the road and was commanded to surrender. Ignoring the demand, the occupants attempted to flee and were met with gunfire. The carriage was seized, revealing two men and three women inside. Tragically, two men and one woman were killed in the exchange of fire. Another woman, in a desperate attempt to defend herself, grabbed a sabre and struck at one of the insurgents, resulting in her death. The surviving woman was captured but treated well until the arrival of Turkish forces, upon which she was released.
Limited Casualties Caused by Insurgents
According to available information, these incidents resulted in the deaths of only two women at the hands of the insurgents. However, one of these deaths was accidental, highlighting the chaotic nature of the confrontations. Contrary to claims by Turkish authorities in Philippopolis, who reported a higher death toll of twelve, concrete evidence supporting these claims is lacking, leading to skepticism from observers like Mr. Schuyler.
The events surrounding the fortification efforts were marked by confrontations and violence, reflecting the simmering tensions between the villagers and representatives of authority. While resistance was evident, casualties were limited, with most incidents arising from clashes during attempts to disarm or apprehend individuals. Skepticism regarding official casualty figures underscores the need for further investigation and verification of claims made by both sides involved in the conflict.
0 notes
Photo
A Daunting Task in Harsh Conditions
Arduous Journey
Mr. Baring and Mr. Schuyler face a formidable challenge in their assigned task. They have embarked on their mission with earnest determination, visiting the towns and villages ravaged by the Bashi-Bazouks. Their objective is to witness firsthand the devastation wrought upon these communities and to listen directly to the accounts of the villagers. This endeavor demands extensive travel, often spanning five to fifteen hours a day, along roads that are scarcely navigable, particularly for carriages. Enduring the scorching sun, exacerbated by the oppressive August humidity, adds to the grueling nature of their journey. Mr. Baring has already fallen ill twice due to the combination of overexertion, rigorous labor, and the relentless heat. Even Mr. Schuyler, accustomed to the rigors of such expeditions from his previous travels through Turkestan, finds the conditions nearly unbearable Guided Turkey Tours .
Emotional Toll
While the physical challenges of their mission are daunting, it is the emotional toll that weighs heaviest upon them. The heart-rending cries of despair echoing through the air, the sight of grieving women and children, and the poignant encounters with homeless and starving individuals evoke profound anguish. Everywhere they turn, they are met with scenes of sorrow—widows and orphans mourning the loss of loved ones, with no shelter or sustenance to comfort them. The relentless repetition of tragic narratives, the exhaustive process of gathering and corroborating evidence, all contribute to the overwhelming burden borne by Mr. Baring and Mr. Schuyler.
Enduring Hardship
Despite the formidable challenges they face, Mr. Baring and Mr. Schuyler press on with their mission, driven by a sense of duty and a commitment to uncovering the truth. Their resilience in the face of adversity is commendable, yet the toll on their physical and emotional well-being is undeniable. The enormity of the suffering they witness, the desperation of those they encounter, leaves an indelible mark on their psyche. It is a task that few would willingly undertake, and one that they may find difficult to revisit in the future. Yet, their perseverance in the pursuit of justice and accountability serves as a testament to their unwavering dedication to their cause.
0 notes
Photo
Collectivization and Economic Policies
Collectivization and Economic Policies (1950-1958)
Collectivization of Land (1950-1952)
In 1950, Bulgaria adopted the “Model Statute of the Collective Farms” (TKZS), modeled closely on the Soviet kolkhoz statute. The collectivization of land under the First Five Year Plan progressed significantly:
Year Collective Farms Farmers (%) Arable Land (%) 1944 28 — — 1946 480 3.7% 3.5% 1948 1,110 11.2% 6% 1952 2,747 52.3% 60.5% The forced collectivization peaked in 1950, witnessing a significant increase in the number of collective farms. By the end of the First Five Year Plan, 60% of arable land and 50% of all farms were transformed into cooperatives Guided Istanbul Tour.
Economic and Labor Policies (1950-1957)
In 1950, a new system of compulsory state supplies was introduced, obliging farmers to provide a fixed quantity of grain to the state, irrespective of the yield. The year 1951 saw the implementation of a new Labor Code, issuing job passports and prohibiting job changes. The Second Five Year Plan (1953-1957) continued the focus on industrial expansion, particularly in heavy industry, and intensified land collectivization.
Capital Investments and Industrial Preferences (1953-1957)
A comparison of capital investments between the First and Second Five Year Plans reveals a clear preference for industrial development:
Sector 1st Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) 2nd Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) Industry 5.9 13.0 Agriculture 1.2 3.2 Transport and Communications 2.1 3.1 Others 2.8 4.7 Total 12.0 24.0
The preferred category of industry can be further divided into heavy and light industry
Year Heavy Industry (%) Light Industry (%) 1939 29% 71% 1948 35% 65% 1952 39.1% 60.9% 1955 45.2% 54.8% Acceleration of Collectivization (1953-1958)
The tempo of collectivization in agriculture accelerated towards the end of the Second Five Year Plan. It set the stage for the “great leap forward” at the beginning of the Third Plan:
Year Collective Farms (TKZS) Farmers Average Acreage per Farm 1953 2,744 207 2,127 acres 1958 3,290 374 2,850 acres In 1957, the Labor Code underwent revision. By April 10, 1958, the Socialist sector dominated Bulgaria’s national economy, constituting:
98% of entire industrial production 87% of entire rural-economic production 99% of domestic trade 93% of national income.
0 notes
Photo
Collectivization and Economic Policies
Collectivization and Economic Policies (1950-1958)
Collectivization of Land (1950-1952)
In 1950, Bulgaria adopted the “Model Statute of the Collective Farms” (TKZS), modeled closely on the Soviet kolkhoz statute. The collectivization of land under the First Five Year Plan progressed significantly:
Year Collective Farms Farmers (%) Arable Land (%) 1944 28 — — 1946 480 3.7% 3.5% 1948 1,110 11.2% 6% 1952 2,747 52.3% 60.5% The forced collectivization peaked in 1950, witnessing a significant increase in the number of collective farms. By the end of the First Five Year Plan, 60% of arable land and 50% of all farms were transformed into cooperatives Guided Istanbul Tour.
Economic and Labor Policies (1950-1957)
In 1950, a new system of compulsory state supplies was introduced, obliging farmers to provide a fixed quantity of grain to the state, irrespective of the yield. The year 1951 saw the implementation of a new Labor Code, issuing job passports and prohibiting job changes. The Second Five Year Plan (1953-1957) continued the focus on industrial expansion, particularly in heavy industry, and intensified land collectivization.
Capital Investments and Industrial Preferences (1953-1957)
A comparison of capital investments between the First and Second Five Year Plans reveals a clear preference for industrial development:
Sector 1st Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) 2nd Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) Industry 5.9 13.0 Agriculture 1.2 3.2 Transport and Communications 2.1 3.1 Others 2.8 4.7 Total 12.0 24.0
The preferred category of industry can be further divided into heavy and light industry
Year Heavy Industry (%) Light Industry (%) 1939 29% 71% 1948 35% 65% 1952 39.1% 60.9% 1955 45.2% 54.8% Acceleration of Collectivization (1953-1958)
The tempo of collectivization in agriculture accelerated towards the end of the Second Five Year Plan. It set the stage for the “great leap forward” at the beginning of the Third Plan:
Year Collective Farms (TKZS) Farmers Average Acreage per Farm 1953 2,744 207 2,127 acres 1958 3,290 374 2,850 acres In 1957, the Labor Code underwent revision. By April 10, 1958, the Socialist sector dominated Bulgaria’s national economy, constituting:
98% of entire industrial production 87% of entire rural-economic production 99% of domestic trade 93% of national income.
0 notes
Photo
Collectivization and Economic Policies
Collectivization and Economic Policies (1950-1958)
Collectivization of Land (1950-1952)
In 1950, Bulgaria adopted the “Model Statute of the Collective Farms” (TKZS), modeled closely on the Soviet kolkhoz statute. The collectivization of land under the First Five Year Plan progressed significantly:
Year Collective Farms Farmers (%) Arable Land (%) 1944 28 — — 1946 480 3.7% 3.5% 1948 1,110 11.2% 6% 1952 2,747 52.3% 60.5% The forced collectivization peaked in 1950, witnessing a significant increase in the number of collective farms. By the end of the First Five Year Plan, 60% of arable land and 50% of all farms were transformed into cooperatives Guided Istanbul Tour.
Economic and Labor Policies (1950-1957)
In 1950, a new system of compulsory state supplies was introduced, obliging farmers to provide a fixed quantity of grain to the state, irrespective of the yield. The year 1951 saw the implementation of a new Labor Code, issuing job passports and prohibiting job changes. The Second Five Year Plan (1953-1957) continued the focus on industrial expansion, particularly in heavy industry, and intensified land collectivization.
Capital Investments and Industrial Preferences (1953-1957)
A comparison of capital investments between the First and Second Five Year Plans reveals a clear preference for industrial development:
Sector 1st Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) 2nd Five Year Plan (Billion Leva) Industry 5.9 13.0 Agriculture 1.2 3.2 Transport and Communications 2.1 3.1 Others 2.8 4.7 Total 12.0 24.0
The preferred category of industry can be further divided into heavy and light industry
Year Heavy Industry (%) Light Industry (%) 1939 29% 71% 1948 35% 65% 1952 39.1% 60.9% 1955 45.2% 54.8% Acceleration of Collectivization (1953-1958)
The tempo of collectivization in agriculture accelerated towards the end of the Second Five Year Plan. It set the stage for the “great leap forward” at the beginning of the Third Plan:
Year Collective Farms (TKZS) Farmers Average Acreage per Farm 1953 2,744 207 2,127 acres 1958 3,290 374 2,850 acres In 1957, the Labor Code underwent revision. By April 10, 1958, the Socialist sector dominated Bulgaria’s national economy, constituting:
98% of entire industrial production 87% of entire rural-economic production 99% of domestic trade 93% of national income.
0 notes
Photo
Embracing Nature's Challenges Rain or Shine
A Walk in the Rain
Would you walk on muddy mountain paths even if rain-loaded dark clouds hovered above, and a sharp wind rushed through you, releasing cold raindrops into your clothes? For the members of GOLDOSK, a nature sports and hobby club, the answer is a resounding yes. Last Sunday, despite the challenging weather, a group of nature enthusiasts gathered to walk through the mountains and brooks with smiles on their faces.
Soaked to the Skin, Yet Smiling
Sticky mud shackles their progress, and the vision is obscured by the downpour. Soaked to the skin and chilled to the marrow, the group, comprising kids, men, women, and seniors, moves under dark clouds, through rain and a sharp wind. They walk towards Barla, undeterred by the elements, sharing the love of nature in all seasons. The mountains they pass give way, sometimes leading the way.
Finding Beauty in the Chaos
Raindrops gather on the ground, forming tiny murky brooks, creating a symphony of plashing sounds. Yellow and white crocuses smile at them amidst the challenging conditions. Despite the mud, cold, and rain, the group looks at each other and smiles, finding beauty in the chaos. They are not deterred by the mess; instead, they consider the suffering towards the moment of purification from stress and inner dirt Guided Tours Turkey.
Sacred Moments of Learning
“Why endure this misery when you could rest in your cozy houses?” some might ask. Yet, for GOLDOSK, the suffering is sacred, leading to moments of learning and purification. Hakan Ayan, one of GOLDOSK’s founders, explains, “We met with nature, made peace with it. People started their weeks free of trouble or stress.” The experience of being in nature together breaks down invisible walls, bringing people together in ways they wouldn’t have expected.
From Two Friends to an Association
GOLDOSK’s journey began with two friends discussing how to enjoy their weekends. Small walking activities grew, and from five members, they became ten, then a hundred. Today, GOLDOSK is a thriving association where people from all walks of life come together. Besides nature trips, the organization has formed groups focused on music, skiing, painting, and photography, embracing diverse interests within the community.
0 notes
Photo
Embracing Nature's Challenges Rain or Shine
A Walk in the Rain
Would you walk on muddy mountain paths even if rain-loaded dark clouds hovered above, and a sharp wind rushed through you, releasing cold raindrops into your clothes? For the members of GOLDOSK, a nature sports and hobby club, the answer is a resounding yes. Last Sunday, despite the challenging weather, a group of nature enthusiasts gathered to walk through the mountains and brooks with smiles on their faces.
Soaked to the Skin, Yet Smiling
Sticky mud shackles their progress, and the vision is obscured by the downpour. Soaked to the skin and chilled to the marrow, the group, comprising kids, men, women, and seniors, moves under dark clouds, through rain and a sharp wind. They walk towards Barla, undeterred by the elements, sharing the love of nature in all seasons. The mountains they pass give way, sometimes leading the way.
Finding Beauty in the Chaos
Raindrops gather on the ground, forming tiny murky brooks, creating a symphony of plashing sounds. Yellow and white crocuses smile at them amidst the challenging conditions. Despite the mud, cold, and rain, the group looks at each other and smiles, finding beauty in the chaos. They are not deterred by the mess; instead, they consider the suffering towards the moment of purification from stress and inner dirt Guided Tours Turkey.
Sacred Moments of Learning
“Why endure this misery when you could rest in your cozy houses?” some might ask. Yet, for GOLDOSK, the suffering is sacred, leading to moments of learning and purification. Hakan Ayan, one of GOLDOSK’s founders, explains, “We met with nature, made peace with it. People started their weeks free of trouble or stress.” The experience of being in nature together breaks down invisible walls, bringing people together in ways they wouldn’t have expected.
From Two Friends to an Association
GOLDOSK’s journey began with two friends discussing how to enjoy their weekends. Small walking activities grew, and from five members, they became ten, then a hundred. Today, GOLDOSK is a thriving association where people from all walks of life come together. Besides nature trips, the organization has formed groups focused on music, skiing, painting, and photography, embracing diverse interests within the community.
0 notes
Photo
Klissura's Unfulfilled Hopes
The Lingering Shadows of Klissura’s Despair
This article delves into the aftermath of Klissura’s devastation, shedding light on the broken promises and insurmountable barriers that continue to plague the survivors. Despite assurances of restitution, the plight of Klissura epitomizes the bureaucratic hurdles and unfulfilled hopes that define the post-atrocity landscape.
The Elusive Return of Cattle and Retorts
In the wake of Klissura’s destruction, promises echoed through the air like a distant, fleeting melody. The Mutle-Serif of Philippopolis tantalized the victims with visions of assembled cattle awaiting identification, only to be revealed as an illusion. The pledged return of retorts and cattle remained an unfulfilled promise, leaving the survivors in Klissura grappling with shattered expectations Tour Bulgaria.
The Philippopolis Passport Paradox
The seemingly straightforward directive to reclaim lost cattle at Philippopolis unfolded into a Kafkaesque paradox. While the prospect appeared just and equitable, Mr. Schuyler unraveled the hidden layers of deception. Striking at the core of Turkish duplicity, he uncovered the issuance of strict orders preventing villagers from leaving without a special passport. The freedom to claim one’s cattle now danced behind bureaucratic barriers—a cruel twist in the quest for justice.
Imprisoned Amidst Ruins
In Klissura, where hope was already a scarce commodity, the people faced an additional blow. Stripped of their homes and livelihoods, they found themselves imprisoned amidst the ruins. The promise of identifying and reclaiming their cattle in Philippopolis turned into a cruel irony as the survivors were forbidden to leave the remnants of their village, perpetuating their state of despair.
A Glimpse into Systemic Deception
The restrictive passport measures exemplify the broader Turkish strategy in responding to demands for justice and reform. A veneer of compliance conceals a maze of bureaucratic obstructions, rendering promises hollow. Klissura’s ordeal serves as a poignant illustration of the systemic deception employed to feign adherence to international demands while perpetuating the suffering of the afflicted.
Klissura’s Cry for Genuine Restoration
Klissura’s cry echoes beyond its razed landscape—a plea for genuine restoration, devoid of empty promises and bureaucratic machinations. The international community must heed the lessons of Klissura, exposing the façade of compliance and demanding tangible actions to rebuild shattered lives. Only through unyielding pressure can Klissura’s survivors hope for a future unmarred by broken promises and bureaucratic barriers.
0 notes
Photo
Klissura's Unfulfilled Hopes
The Lingering Shadows of Klissura’s Despair
This article delves into the aftermath of Klissura’s devastation, shedding light on the broken promises and insurmountable barriers that continue to plague the survivors. Despite assurances of restitution, the plight of Klissura epitomizes the bureaucratic hurdles and unfulfilled hopes that define the post-atrocity landscape.
The Elusive Return of Cattle and Retorts
In the wake of Klissura’s destruction, promises echoed through the air like a distant, fleeting melody. The Mutle-Serif of Philippopolis tantalized the victims with visions of assembled cattle awaiting identification, only to be revealed as an illusion. The pledged return of retorts and cattle remained an unfulfilled promise, leaving the survivors in Klissura grappling with shattered expectations Tour Bulgaria.
The Philippopolis Passport Paradox
The seemingly straightforward directive to reclaim lost cattle at Philippopolis unfolded into a Kafkaesque paradox. While the prospect appeared just and equitable, Mr. Schuyler unraveled the hidden layers of deception. Striking at the core of Turkish duplicity, he uncovered the issuance of strict orders preventing villagers from leaving without a special passport. The freedom to claim one’s cattle now danced behind bureaucratic barriers—a cruel twist in the quest for justice.
Imprisoned Amidst Ruins
In Klissura, where hope was already a scarce commodity, the people faced an additional blow. Stripped of their homes and livelihoods, they found themselves imprisoned amidst the ruins. The promise of identifying and reclaiming their cattle in Philippopolis turned into a cruel irony as the survivors were forbidden to leave the remnants of their village, perpetuating their state of despair.
A Glimpse into Systemic Deception
The restrictive passport measures exemplify the broader Turkish strategy in responding to demands for justice and reform. A veneer of compliance conceals a maze of bureaucratic obstructions, rendering promises hollow. Klissura’s ordeal serves as a poignant illustration of the systemic deception employed to feign adherence to international demands while perpetuating the suffering of the afflicted.
Klissura’s Cry for Genuine Restoration
Klissura’s cry echoes beyond its razed landscape—a plea for genuine restoration, devoid of empty promises and bureaucratic machinations. The international community must heed the lessons of Klissura, exposing the façade of compliance and demanding tangible actions to rebuild shattered lives. Only through unyielding pressure can Klissura’s survivors hope for a future unmarred by broken promises and bureaucratic barriers.
0 notes